Compass Park

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 177 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 111 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 167 beds and averages 147.1 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · D2025-08-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure privacy was provided during personal care for 1 of 7 residents observed for personal care. (Resident 137)Finding includes:On 8/4/25 at 11:50 a.m., the clinical record for Resident 137 was reviewed. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (a chronic progressive lung disease that causes irreversible scarring in the lungs).The clinical record indicated on 10/18/24 Resident 137 elected to receive hospice care.On 8/4/25 at 11:33 a.m. observed Resident 137's door half open. Resident 137 was receiving incontinent care. Resident 137 was lying in bed positioned on his right side facing the wall while CNA 2 was holding the resident in place with one hand and cleaning Resident 137's coccyx with the other hand. During an interview on 8/4/25 at 11:38 a.m., RN 3 indicated that the door should not be open when providing incontinence care.During an interview on 8/6/25 at 11:18 a.m., the Director of Nursing indicated privacy should be provided with the closing of the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that written notification was provided to the resident, the resident's representative, and to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for written transfer and discharge notification. (Resident 140, Resident 1, Resident 123) Findings include: 1. On 9/18/24 at 2:12 p.m., Resident 140's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), chronic respiratory failure, and orthostatic hypotension (form of low blood pressure that happens when standing after sitting or lying down). Resident 140's face sheet had identified a family member as the emergency contact person. A progress note, dated 7/4/24 at 2:19 p.m., indicated Resident 140 was transferred to the hospital emergency department. The transfer was a facility-initiated transfer. The clinical record lacked documentation that the written notification of the Notice of Transfer or Discharge document was provided to Resident 140, the emergency contact, and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a written bed hold notification was provided to the resident and to the resident's representative for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for bed hold notifications. (Resident 1, Resident 123, and Resident 140) Findings include: 1. On 9/16/24 at 10:55 a.m., Resident 1's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes, acute and chronic respiratory failure, and heart failure. Resident 1 had identified a family member as the resident's guardian and emergency contact person. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/24/24, indicated Resident 1 was moderately cognitively impaired. A review of Resident 1's progress notes indicated that Resident 1 had facility-initiated transfers out to the hospital emergency department on 4/25/24, 3/13/24, and 3/6/24. The clinical record lacked documentation that indicated the written bed hold notification was given or sent to Resident 1 and to resident's guardian and emergency contact person for these transfers. 2. On 9/19/24 at 8:32 a.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for new admissions. The baseline care plan lacked a information on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. (Resident 82) Finding includes: On 9/19/24 at 1:25 p.m., Resident 82's clinical record was reviewed. The admission Assessment, dated 7/25/24, indicated Resident 82 had a feeding tube and a suprapubic catheter. The Interim Care Plan (baseline care plan), dated 7/25/24, indicated Resident 82 had a feeding tube and a suprapubic catheter. The Interim Care Plan lacked information regarding Enhanced Barrier Precautions. On 9/19/24 at 2:30 p.m., the DON indicated Resident 82's Baseline Care Plan should have indicated that Resident 82 required Enhanced Barrier Precautions. 3.1-30(a)

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the infection control practices were implemented for 1 of 8 residents observed with Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EPB). Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was not used to administer medications via a feeding tube for a resident on EPB. (Resident 82) Finding Includes: During an observation on 9/18/24 at 8:47 a.m., LPN 2 prepared medications to be administered via a feeding tube. LPN 2 took the medications into Resident 82's room, closed the door for privacy, washed her hands, and applied gloves. LPN 2 had begun to administer the medications. LPN 2 was queried if Resident 82 was on EBP. LPN 2 stopped and walked over to supplies of PPE and put on a gown. During an observation on 9/16/24 at 9:50 a.m., an Enhanced Barrier Precaution Sign was posted on the outside of Resident 82's room. During an interview on 9/18/24 at 1:04 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated that all staff should wear gloves and gown with direct care for resident's on EPB. On 9/18/24 at 11:04 a.m., the DON provided a copy of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served in a sanitary manner for 2 of 3 kitchen observations. Staff hair was not covered while in the kitchen. (Kitchen Staff 2, Kitchen Staff 3, Kitchen Staff 4, [NAME] 5, Kitchen Staff 6) Findings include: 1. During the initial kitchen observation on 11/1/23 from 11:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m., the following was observed: - Kitchen Staff 2 was observed walking throughout the kitchen area and preparing the noon meal trays near the steam table where the noon meal was being held. Kitchen Staff 2 was observed to have multiple loose hairs, approximately 10 inches in length, in front of both ears. The loose hairs were observed to not be covered. - Kitchen Staff 3 was observed walking throughout the kitchen area and preparing the noon meal trays near the steam table where the noon meal was being held. Kitchen Staff 3 was observed to have multiple loose hairs, approximately 6 inches in length, in front of both ears. The loose hairs were observed to not be covered. - Kitchen Staff 4 was observed walking…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure potentially hazardous materials were kept secure behind locked doors to prevent resident's access to the materials for 1 of 5 observations. (Electrical Closet) Finding includes: On 11/2/23 at 1:00 p.m., the following was observed on the second floor of the facility: A room labeled Electrical Closet, located near the dining area and the Scottish Rite resident hallways for rooms 2104 through 2142, was ajar. The door handle was in the locked position but the door itself was not closed or latched completely and could be pushed open easily. Inside were multiple electrical panels with warning labels reading Shock and Arc Flash Hazard. No staff were visible in the immediate area. During an interview on 11/2/23 at 1:05 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated that the Electrical Closet room door should be kept locked and latched completely. During an interview on 11/2/23 at 2:26 p.m., the DON indicated that the Scottish Rite unit had 8 of 40 residents who were cognitively impaired and independently mobile who could have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• No harm found · C2023-11-08 · tag F0732 — widespread
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the daily posted nurse staffing reflected the actual hours worked by staff and failed to ensure the post was easily accessible for staff and guests for 3 of 5 days during the survey period. Findings include: During an observation on 11/2/23 at 10:30 a.m., the posted daily staffing document was observed to lack the actual hours worked by staff. The document was observed to be posted behind the receptionist desk hanging on the wall approximately 6 feet from the visitor side of the receptionist desk and was difficult to read due to the small size print. On 11/3/23 at 9:30 a.m., the posted daily staffing document was observed to lack the actual hours worked by staff. The document was observed to be posted behind the receptionist desk hanging on the wall approximately 6 feet from the visitor side of the receptionist desk and was difficult to read due to the small size print. On 11/4/23 at 8:33 a.m., the posted daily staffing document was observed to lack the actual hours worked by staff. The document was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 46 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN