Heritage Pointe Of Huntington

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 138 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 62 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 74.4 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.33 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.88 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.48 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-03-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from mental abuse by a staff member when the staff member recorded a cognitively impaired resident with her personal cell phone while the resident was using the restroom and the staff member viewed the recording with others. (Resident B and CNA 3) Using the reasonable person concept, it can be determined Resident B would not expect to be video recorded while using the restroom in his home (the facility) and would experience psychosocial harm, dehumanization, and humiliation as a result of this mental abuse. Findings include:Review of a cell phone video recording, provided by the DON on 3/9/26 at 9:46 a.m., indicated the following:CNA 3 recorded a 14-second-long video. The video showed Resident B's uncovered upper left thigh while he was sitting on a toilet seat riser in the restroom. Resident B's face was not shown in the video. Resident B gripped CNA 3's left wrist with his left hand. CNA 3 proceeded to state Ow,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of dietary recommendations for a resident with weight loss for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 41). Finding includes:Resident 41's clinical record was reviewed on 2/9/26 at 10:10 a.m. Diagnoses included protein-calorie malnutrition and dementia. Current orders included regular diet with a half peanut butter and jelly sandwich at lunch and supper, may offer finger foods (1/7/26) and weekly weight - notify physician for five-pound gain or loss (2/2/26). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/9/26, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. She required supervision/touching staff assistance with eating. A current care plan indicated the resident was at nutritional risk (revised 1/5/26). Interventions included diet/supplements as ordered (12/22/25). A dietician progress note, dated 2/3/26 at 4:25 p.m., indicated the resident had a weight loss of 4.4 pounds and a recommendation to add a high-calorie supplement shake at breakfast…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, a staff member failed to report a resident's allegation of abuse to the administrator for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident 69) Finding includes:Resident 69's record was reviewed on 2/9/26 at 9:33 a.m. Diagnoses included macular degeneration, hearing loss unspecified ear, and insomnia. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/13/25, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. A progress note, dated 1/12/26 at 5:11 a.m., indicated the resident woke up with a headache. She refused pain medication. She rubbed the top of her head and said it hurt when she rubbed her head. No injury was noted. The resident said she did not have any pain when she went to bed. She woke up with the pain. A progress note, dated 1/12/26 at 5:50 a.m., indicated the CNA told the nurse the resident had told her that she remembered what happened. The loud speaking NNN that was just in her room had been swinging something around and hit the resident in the head with it. The nurse went into the room at that time. The resident's eyes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives received a copy of their baseline care plans on admission for 6 of 10 residents reviewed for care plans. (Residents 7, 11, 13, 50, 55, and 76)Findings include:1.Resident 50's clinical record was reviewed on 2/11/26 at 11 a.m. Census information indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE]. The clinical record lacked documentation that the resident or the resident's representative was provided with a copy of the baseline care plan. During an interview, on 2/11/26 at 11:48 a.m., the Administrator indicated a discussion of Resident 50's baseline care plan summary was not conveyed with Resident 50 ,nor to his representative. 2. Resident 55's clinical record was reviewed on 2/11/26 at 11:45 a.m. Census information indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE]. The clinical record lacked documentation that the resident or the resident's representative was provided with a copy of the baseline care plan. During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a cognitively impaired resident to prevent repeated falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident 41). Finding includes: During an observation, on 2/6/26 at 9:58 a.m., Resident 41 sat in her recliner with her feet elevated. Nonskid strips were in front of recliner. She wore nonskid slippers and her eyes tracked the television program. Resident 41's record was reviewed on 2/9/26 at 10:10 a.m. Diagnoses included dementia, severe, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, fracture of unspecified part of neck of the left femur, and chronic pain syndrome. Current physician orders included the following: sertraline (antidepressant) 50 mg twice a day (2/2/26), tramadol/acetaminophen (pain reliever) 37.5-325 mg twice a day (12/22/25), gabapentin (anticonvulsant) 300 mg twice a day (12/22/25), and non-skid strips in front of recliner, keep walker within reach (1/27/26). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/9/26, indicated the resident was severely…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician prescribed diets were followed and resident food preferences were honored for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 9). Finding includes: During an interview, on 2/5/26 at 3:33 p.m., Resident 9 indicated she did not have natural teeth and did not wear dentures. She occasionally received chopped up meat with her meals. She was unsure why sometimes the meat was chopped and other times it was not. She preferred to have her meat chopped at every meal because having no teeth made it difficult to chew. Resident 9's clinical record was reviewed on 2/9/26 at 1:20 p.m. Current physician orders included a regular diet with regular texture, regular consistency, ground meat and no added salt (1/21/26). A current care plan, revised on 8/28/24, indicated Resident 9 was at nutritional risk related to diagnosis of diabetes, hyperlipidemia, anemia, depression, and significant weight gain. She received a therapeutic diet related to her diagnosis of diabetes. Interventions included the following:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0882 — isolated
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist (IP) role was filled by a staff member with the appropriate schedule to support the ability to perform IP responsibilities by having the full-time DON assume IP responsibilities.Findings include:During the entrance conference, on 2/5/26 at 9:20 a.m., the Administrator indicated the DON was the Infection Preventionist for the facility.The facility census, provided on 2/5/26 at 10:31 a.m. by the Administrator, indicated the facility census was 75.During an interview, on 2/9/26 at 1:35 p.m., the DON indicated she oversaw the infection prevention and control program with the staff development nurse. The DON was scheduled for 40 hours a week and spent about 10 hours a week performing Infection Prevention duties.During an interview, on 2/10/26 at 3:45 p.m., the Administrator indicated the DON was unable to provide a time sheet to show hours she worked as the DON compared to when she worked as the Infection Preventionist. Depending on what was going on within the facility, the DON could be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a cognitively impaired resident to prevent repeated falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident B) Finding includes:During an observation, on 10/20/25 at 11:49 a.m., Resident B was sitting in a wheelchair at a dining room table, eating. The front of the wheelchair was slightly elevated, allowing the resident to be tilted back. Anti-tippers were secured to the wheelchair. An elevated slanted wheelchair cushion was in place. The resident was able to rest his toes on the floor as he ate. During an observation, on 10/20/25 at 3:21 p.m., Resident B sat in a recliner, with his feet elevated, in a common area in front of the nurse's station. No staff were present. The resident wore nonskid footwear. He occasionally made a grunting noise. He kicked off his left shoe and slid down in the recliner. After a couple of minutes, a staff member approached the resident and redirected the resident to wait until a 2nd staff member could assist to take him to the bathroom.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure transmission-based precautions were implemented to prevent the spread of infectious gastroenteritis for 1 of 9 residents with gastroenteritis (Resident 15). This deficient practice resulted in the development of gastroenteritis for 8 of the remaining 16 residents who resided on the secured unit (Resident 20, 41, 61, 25, 50, 32, 52, and 38). Findings include: During an interview, on 12/27/24 at 9:02 a.m., the Administrator indicated the secured unit had experienced an outbreak. Five residents began experiencing nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea through the night. The residents had been tested for COVID-19, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and influenza. The facility was awaiting the results to determine what type of infection the residents had contracted. 1. During an observation, on 12/26/24 at 12:11 p.m., Resident 15 sat in the dining room, eating lunch. Resident 15's clinical record was reviewed on 12/30/24 at 4:09 p.m. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease with late onset. Physicians' orders…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide daily grooming assistance for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). (Resident 3) Findings include: During a random observation, on 12/26/24 at 12:40 p.m., Resident 3 was sitting in a wheelchair in front of her television. Her fingernails were long and had a brown substance under the tips. Resident 3 indicated staff normally kept up on her nails, but they had been busy lately. During an interview, on 12/27/24 at 9:50 a.m., Resident 3 indicated she had received a shower yesterday. Resident 3's fingernails were observed to be long and had a brown substance under the tips. During an interview, on 12/30/24 at 9:51 a.m., Resident 3 indicated she would get a shower that night and she wanted her nails cut. Her nails remained long and had a brown substance underneath the tips. Resident 3's clinical record was reviewed on 12/30/24 at 10:01 a.m. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, chronic kidney disease stage 3, emphysema, dyspnea, and borderline…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent repeated falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident 30) Findings include: Resident 30's clinical record was reviewed on 12/30/24 at 9:11 a.m. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease with late onset, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, essential hypertension, and anxiety disorder. Current physician orders, on 12/30/24, included amlodipine besylate (anti-hypertensive) 2.5 milligram (mg), Celexa (antidepressant) 10 mg, buspirone (antianxiety) 10 mg, and Rozerem (sedative) 8 mg. Ordered fall interventions included the following: non-skid strips next to bed, chair and toilet, red non-slip placemat to bedside table, touch pad call light, leave bathroom light on at night, Dycem (anti-slip mat) to recliner, bed height marked at 24 inches top of mattress per therapy, keep walker within reach at all times, Every one hour safety checks, stop sign to bathroom door (keep…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 47 rows in the source record cover these 31 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN