Hooverwood

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 173 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 155 beds and averages 128.4 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.80 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.14 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.93 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a diagnosis of dementia who resided on a secured locked unit and at risk of elopement did not exit the facility unsupervised for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident B) Resident B wandered approximately 0.4 miles away from the facility and had crossed a two-lane road.The immediate jeopardy began, on 12/23/25, when Resident B exited the facility unsupervised and without the staff's knowledge while wearing a wanderguard device (a wearable device used to alert staff when a resident approached restrictive areas/doors). The resident exited the secured locked unit through an unlocked stairway door, went down the stairwell to the first floor, and exited the facility through an unlocked but alarmed door. Facility staff reset the door alarm without being able to determine the cause of the alarm. Resident B was found walking down the road in the grass by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2. The Director of Nursing (DON) was notified of the immediate jeopardy on 12/29/25 at 2:27p.m.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-12-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by a staff member for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse. (Resident B) Resident B was sexually assaulted by a contracted housekeeping staff member. The immediate jeopardy began on 12/21/24, when Housekeeper 2 was observed to be laying on top of Resident B. Housekeeper 2's pants were down, and his private parts were exposed. Resident B's gown was pulled up, her brief was open, and her private area was exposed. The Interim Executive Director (ED) and Interim Director of Nursing were notified of the immediate jeopardy on 12/26/24 at 2:42 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed, and the deficient practice corrected on 12/22/24, prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past Noncompliance. Finding includes: An Indiana Department of Health intake form indicated, on 12/21/24, a staff member walked into a resident's room and witnessed a housekeeping employee on top of a resident in the dementia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to effectively administer back blows for a choking resident in accordance with treatment guidelines established by the facility and failed to ensure the plan of care was effectively revised with accurate care information (Resident S). This deficient practice resulted in Resident S experiencing a choking episode with a change in the level of consciousness which required emergent treatment. The facility also failed to ensure residents maintained upright positioning while sitting in chairs (Resident V and F), to ensure the physician was notified for blood sugars above specified parameters and to ensure weights were completed daily (Resident 99) for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: 1. A Facility Reported Incident (FRI) report, dated 1/4/24 at 12:40 p.m., indicated Resident S was in the dining room eating lunch when the nursing staff observed the resident choking on her food and her color was changing. The resident was not able to cough or clear her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-20 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Date Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded for 5 of 7 residents reviewed for resident assessments. (Resident 6, 8, 22, 46, and 105)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 6 was reviewed on 4/20/26 at 9:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and falls.A nursing progress note, dated 3/27/26, indicated Resident 6 had a fall in her room, sustained a hematoma to her forehead, and was sent to the emergency room for evaluation.A MDS assessment, dated 3/29/26, indicated Resident 6 had no falls with an injury since admission.During an interview, on 4/17/26 at 3:04 p.m., the MDS coordinator indicated Resident 6's MDS assessment was on 3/29/26 and should have been marked for a fall with injury.2. The clinical record for Resident 8 was reviewed on 4/17/26 at 3:33 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, partial intestinal obstruction, congestive heart failure, and hypoglycemia.A MDS assessment, dated 3/25/26, indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed, medications were administered according to the ordered parameters, and a daily weight was obtained for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 130, 16, 108 and 14)Findings Include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 130 was reviewed on 4/15/26 at 3:04 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure (CHF), acute osteomyelitis (a serious bone infection) of the right ankle and foot, cognitive communication deficit, hypertension, and malignant neoplasm of the prostate. A care plan, dated 1/21/26, indicated Resident 130 had a diagnosis of congestive heart failure. Interventions included, but were not limited to, monitoring the resident's weight daily. A physician's order, dated 4/10/26, indicated to obtain a daily weight and to notify the physician if the weight was greater than 3 pounds in 24 hours or greater than 5 pounds in 1 week. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated a daily weight for Resident 130 was not obtained on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was in reach for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accommodation of needs. (Resident 11) Findings include:During an observation, on 4/15/26 at 9:45 a.m., Resident 11 was sitting in his room in a Broda chair. His call light was coiled up on his night stand out of the resident's reach.During an observation, on 4/17/26, the resident was lying in his bed with the call light on the ground under the bed.The clinical record for Resident 11 was reviewed on 4/17/26 at 3:21 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, dislocation of the T3/T4 thoracic vertebra, and history of falling.A care plan, dated 7/8/24, indicated Resident 11 was at risk of falls. Interventions included, but were not limited to, be sure the resident's call light was within reach, and the resident needed a safe environment with a reachable call light.During an interview, on 4/17/26 at 3:21 p.m., CAN 10 indicated the call light was under the resident's bed and it should not be out of reach.During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was labeled with an open date in 3 of 5 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. (1B [NAME] Medication Cart, 2B East Medication Cart and 1A East Medication Cart)Findings include:1. During an observation, on 4/17/26 at 3:03 p.m. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3, the 1B [NAME] medication cart had the following:a. One opened bottle of loperamide hydrochloride (a medication used to treat loose stools) 2 milligrams (mg) was not labeled with an open date and had another resident's name label on the bottle.b. One opened bottle of alendronate (a medication used to treat osteoporosis) 70 mg was not labeled with an open date.During an interview, on 4/17/26 at 3:09 p.m., LPN 3 indicated the other resident's label should not have been on the medication and medication should have been labeled with an open date.2. During an observation, on 4/20/26 at 8:34 a.m. with LPN 4, the 2B East medication cart had the following:a. One opened bottle of liquid morphine (a narcotic medication used to treat…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident was free from neglect and was provided incontinence care during an eight-hour shift for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for neglect. (Resident E) The deficient practice was corrected on 6/26/25, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance.Findings include:During an interview, on 12/19/25 at 2:06 p.m., Resident E's daughter indicated she went to visit her mother on 6/2/25 at approximately 6:00 p.m. Upon entering Resident E's room, Resident E was sitting in her recliner covered with a blanket. She noted a strong odor of stale urine and feces and requested CNA 3 take her mother to the restroom. She asked CNA 3 why her mother had not been changed and provided incontinence care. CNA 3 indicated during shift report CNA 2 indicated she had just changed and provided incontinence care to Resident E. Resident E's daughter indicated when CNA 3 and another staff member stood Resident E up with the stand-up lift, Resident E's pants as well as her recliner was completely saturated with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure narcotic medications were free from theft of an employee for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. (Resident C) The deficient practice was corrected on 12/17/25, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance.Findings include:In a signed facility statement, dated 11/22/25, LPN 1 indicated about 2 weeks ago, Resident C had requested a Norco. According to the narcotic count sheet, it was too early for her to have one. The previous nurse (RN 6) had signed out Norco for Resident C twice that day and it had not been 6 hours since the last dose. Resident C indicated she had not received any Norco that day or any other day. She had only taken narcotic pain medications in the evening before bed to help her rest. RN 6 consistently signed out Norco one tablet at around 8:00 a.m., and 1:00 p.m. LPN 1 called the evening supervisor and let her know everything.In a signed facility statement, dated 11/22/25, LPN 4 indicated LPN 1 reported a discrepancy between Resident C's narcotic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-26 · tag F0625 — pattern
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or residents' representatives were provided a notice of the facility bed hold policy at the time of transfer, or in cases of emergency transfer, within 24 hours for 5 of 6 residents reviewed for transfer and discharge. (Resident 80, 9, 66, 108 and 138) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 80 was reviewed on 3/24/25 at 10:52 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes, bipolar disorder, anxiety, borderline personality disorder, seizures, transient ischemic attack, and cerebrovascular accident. A nursing progress note, dated 8/14/24 at 11:00 a.m., indicated the resident was sent to the hospital for a psychiatric evaluation. A social service progress note, dated 8/14/24 at 1:23 p.m., indicated Resident 80 had an active plan to harm himself. The crisis center was contacted, and the resident was willing to go for a psychiatric stay. There was no documentation in the clinical record to indicate the resident or resident's representative was provided with notice of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had self-medication administration assessments completed by the interdisciplinary team for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for self-medication administration. (Resident 73 and 77) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 3/20/25 at 12:21 p.m., Resident 73 had Afrin nasal spray (a decongestant) on her bedside table. The clinical record for Resident 73 was reviewed on 3/20/25 at 12:47 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified edema, bilateral cataract, and hypertension. The clinical record did not contain a self-administration evaluation completed by the interdisciplinary team for the resident to self-administer medications or keep them in her room. 2. During an observation, on 3/20/25 at 12:34 p.m., Resident 77 had lubricant eye drops and diclofenac/lidocaine cream (anti-inflammatory cream) on her bedside table. During an observation, on 3/24/25 at 10:22 a.m., Resident 77 had lubricant eye drops on her bedside table. The clinical record for Resident 77 was reviewed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the ombudsman and resident, or resident's representative was notified in writing of the reason for the resident's transfer and discharge to the hospital for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for transfer and discharge. (Resident 80 and 9) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 80 was reviewed on 3/24/25 at 10:52 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes, bipolar disorder, anxiety, borderline personality disorder, seizures, transient ischemic attack, and cerebrovascular accident. A nursing progress note, dated 8/14/24 at 11:00 a.m., indicated the resident was sent to the hospital for a psychiatric evaluation. A social service progress note, dated 8/14/24 at 1:23 p.m., indicated Resident 80 had an active plan to harm himself. The crisis center was contacted, and the resident was willing to go for a psychiatric stay. There was no documentation found in the resident's clinical record to indicate the resident and resident's representative were given information in writing regarding the reason…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff dressed a resident in a manner to avoid allowing her breast to be exposed and to provide incontinence care in a timely manner for 1 of 1 dependent resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. (Resident 28) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 28 was reviewed on 3/24/25 at 11:29 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and depression. A care plan, dated as revised on 6/20/24, indicated Resident 28 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Interventions included, but were not limited to, assistance by 1 staff for personal hygiene and dressing, and assistance by 2 staff for toileting. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/10/25, indicated Resident 28 was severely cognitively impaired. 1. During an observation, on 3/20/25 at 2:25 p.m., Resident 28 was sitting in the lounge across from the nurse's station with another resident. Resident 28's shirt was pulled up and her left breast was exposed. The Director of Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$41,064 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $15,940 — penalty dated 2025-12-30
• $16,300 — penalty dated 2024-12-27
• $8,824 — penalty dated 2024-03-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 42 rows in the source record cover these 30 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN