No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

St Augustine Home For The Aged

2345 W 86th St, Indianapolis, IN 46260 · Non profit - Corporation · 23 certified beds · (317) 415-5767 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (317) 415-5767 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jan 2025
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ)Not rated
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8550 Naab Rd 300 · (317) 338-9590 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
8414 Naab Rd · (317) 338-7759 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2342 W 86th St · (317) 876-8329 · Call to confirm hours
Park
9001 Fordham St · (317) 872-3288 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.3%11.0%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.4%5.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.9%0.4%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%25.2%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.9%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication33.9%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.5%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.0%13.6%17.1%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

CMS has not published payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours for this facility yet — this can happen for newer, hospital-based, or recently-certified homes. It can also mean the home simply did not file, which CMS does not distinguish in this data, so treat the gap as unexplained rather than benign. Staffing is one of the three parts of the CMS star rating; where it’s missing, weigh the independent health-inspection score most, and ask the facility directly about its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-02)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-20)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed after an increase of an antipsychotic medication secondary to continued and increased behaviors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for PASARR. (Resident 2) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 6/27/25 at 1:32 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and dementia with moderate psychotic disturbances. A Level I PASARR, dated 4/28/25, indicated Resident 2 did not currently have a known or suspected developmental condition or diagnosis that affects intellectual and/or adaptive functioning. The document also indicated if a status change occurred, symptoms increased, or other information suggested a potential serious mental illness, then the nursing facility must submit an updated screen to reevaluate the need for a PASARR Level II behavioral health evaluation. A physician's order, dated 4/22/25, indicated to administer Risperdal (an antipsychotic) 0.5 milligram (mg),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication was held according to the physician's order for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 8) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 8 was reviewed on 6/27/25 at 10:48 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and type 2 diabetes. A physician's order, dated 12/20/23, indicated to give metoprolol (a medication to reduce blood pressure) 12.5 milligrams (mg) by mouth 2 times per day with instruction to hold the medication for a systolic blood pressure less than 110 or a heart rate less than 55. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated metoprolol 12.5 mg was administered against the physician's hold orders on the following dates: a. On 3/3/25, the medication was administered in the evening with a systolic blood pressure of 109. b. On 3/12/25, the medication was administered in the evening with a systolic blood pressure of 109. c. On 4/3/25, the medication was administered in the morning with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were dated after the medication was opened, expired blood glucose control solution was disposed of, and chemicals were properly stored for 1 of 1 medication cart and 1 of 1 medication storage room reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: 1. The medication cart was reviewed, on 6/27/25 at 9:00 a.m., and the following were observed: a. In the large top drawer of the medication cart, brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution (eye drops) had been opened and the bottle did not include an open date. Dorzolamide/Timolol ophthalmic solution (eye drops) had been opened, and the bottle did not include an open date. b. In the small top drawer of the medication cart, blood glucose control solution (solution used to ensure the blood glucose monitor was working correctly) had been opened on 5/11/25 after the expiration date of 3/1/25. 2. The medication storage room contained Clorox chemicals and a bottle of aerosol Raid (bug killer) stored under the sink. During an interview, on 6/27/25 at 9:21…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by a CNA for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B) The deficient practice was corrected on 9/25/24, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Finding includes: A document, titled Indiana State Department of Health Survey Report System, indicated on 9/17/24 at approximately 7:45 a.m., the Executive Director (ED) was notified Resident B alleged CNA 1 knocked me out. The resident's description of the aide involved was consistent with the description of CNA 1. Later in the day on 9/17/24, a discoloration and raised area presented on Resident B's forehead. Staff interviews confirmed the raised area on Resident B's forehead was not present on the previous shift. The evidence pointed toward the resident's description of the incident to be accurate. CNA 1 was terminated. A handwritten facility statement dated 9/17/24 at 7:30 p.m. and signed by RN 2 indicated Resident B's left eye was slightly swollen. When asked if it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's code status was obtained and accurately documented in the clinical record for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for advanced directives. (Resident 171) Finding includes: The clinical record for Resident 171 was reviewed on [DATE] at 2:58 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, hemorrhage from respiratory passages, and anemia. Resident 171 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A document, titled Long-Term Care Patient Summary, with post-acute care discharge instructions, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 171 did not have advanced directives. A document, titled Indiana Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST), was prepared on [DATE]. The designation of the resident's preferences related to, attempt resuscitation/CPR, or do not attempt resuscitation/DNR was left blank. A code status was not documented on the face sheet. There was no order addressing code status found in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    3. The clinical record for Resident 11 was reviewed on 9/17/24 at 2:41 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia, hyperlipidemia, age related osteoporosis, and unspecified atherosclerosis of native arteries of bilateral legs. A physician's order, with a start date of 7/1/24, indicated if a gain or loss of 4 pounds since the last weight, then weigh 4 days consecutively and notify provider if the gain or loss was valid. A vitals log indicated the following weights: On 7/1/2024, the weight was 157.0 pounds. On 8/1/2024, the weight was 156.7 pounds. On 9/1/2024, the weight was 161.5 pounds. On 9/1/24, the resident gained 4.8 pounds compared to the last weight. There was no documentation in the record to indicate the resident had been weighed for 4 days after the weight gain or notification to the provider of the gain had occurred. During an interview, on 9/19/24 at 3:07 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated she did not see documentation to indicate the resident was weighed for those 4 days per the order. During an interview, on 9/20/24 at 10:52…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure urinary output was monitored as ordered by the physician for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for catheter care. (Resident 18) Finding includes: The clinical record for Resident 18 was reviewed on 9/17/24 at 3:33 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral ischemia (acute brain injury from impaired blood flow to the brain), heart failure, and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition which occurs from lack of oxygen in the blood). A care plan, initiated on 4/27/23, indicated the resident had an indwelling catheter related to bladder obstruction and urinary retention. The interventions included, but were not limited to, monitor and document urinary output per the facility policy. A physician's order, initiated on 4/6/23, indicated to record urinary output every shift. The Medication and Treatment Record, for August 2024, was missing urinary output documentation on the night shift for August 1st, the evening shift on August 18th, the night shift on August 21st, and the day shift on August 27th.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was dated for the day it was changed for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Residents 18, 12 and 10) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 9/17/24 at 9:35 a.m., Resident 18 was observed in a recliner in her room. She was found to be using supplemental oxygen at two (2) liters per minute through a nasal cannula. The oxygen line did not have a date to show when the oxygen tubing had been changed. The clinical record for Resident 18 was reviewed on 9/17/24 at 3:33 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral ischemia (acute brain injury from impaired blood flow to the brain), heart failure, and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition which occurs from lack of oxygen in the blood). A physician's order, initiated on 7/11/24, indicated to provide oxygen at two (2) liters per minute via nasal cannula for chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. 2. During an observation, on 9/16/24 at 10:33 a.m., Resident 12 was up in sitting up in her room.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor the use of antibiotics including the use of standardized tools for the appropriateness of antibiotics prescribed for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 11) Finding includes: The clinical record for Resident 11 was reviewed on 9/17/24 at 2:41 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to vitamin D deficiency, hypertension, polyosteoarthritis, and age-related osteoporosis. A physician's order, with a start date of 7/23/24, indicated the resident took Keflex (an antibiotic) oral capsule 250 milligrams (mg). During an interview, on 9/20/24 at 3:27 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated their physician did the tracking for antibiotics. She was not aware of anybody who did surveillance using the McGeer criteria (surveillance definitions used to identify infections) in the facility. The nurses would report the signs and symptoms to the physician but did not use a specific protocol. There was no documentation of a surveillance tool used for the resident. A current policy, titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation and immediately take action to prevent further abuse or mistreatment from occurring while the investigation was in progress for 1 of 1 resident reviewed regarding abuse or mistreatment. (Resident 10) Finding includes: The record for Resident 10 was reviewed on 07/07/2023 at 2:21 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with mood disturbance, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, total retinal detachment affecting the right eye, general muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, and repeated falls. A current MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 05/30/2023, indicated the resident had a BIMs (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 9, indicating the resident demonstrated a cognitive impairment. A progress note, dated 02/19/2023 at 7:00 p.m., indicated Late Entry .Writer spoke to Resident in regard to her complaint of left wrist pain. There was noticeable redness on her left small finger and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-11 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed for a resident with a fall resulting in injury, left sided weakness, and increased behavioral issues for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for MDS assessments. (Resident 7) Finding includes: The record for Resident 7 was reviewed on 07/07/23 at 10:26 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction (stroke), dementia, and repeated falls. A nursing progress note, dated 5/16/22 at 1:22 a.m., indicated the resident fell resulting in an injury on the back and a raised area on the back of the head. The initial neurological checks were within normal limits. A physician's progress note, dated 5/16/23 at 10:15 a.m., indicated the spouse noticed differences in the resident's neurological status and was concerned. The facility called 911 for further evaluation. A progress note, dated 5/23/23 at 5:10 p.m., indicated the resident was re-admitted into the facility and the MD (Medical Doctor) was notified of the return. A progress note, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-11 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse was in the facility for 8 hours during a 24-hour period for 9 days of the first quarter of 2023 reviewed for sufficient staffing. (2/4, 2/5, 2/18, 2/19, 2/25, 2/26 and 3/5, 3/11, 3/19) Finding includes: A Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing report, for the first quarter of 2023, indicated the facility failed to have Registered Nurse coverage for 02/4, 2/5, 2/18, 2/19, 2/25, 2/26, 3/5, 3/11, and 3/19. During a record review, on 07/11/2023 at 10:19 a.m., the actual worked staffing schedules indicated there was no RN coverage for 02/4, 2/5, 2/18, 2/19, 2/25,2/26, 3/5, 3/11, and 3/19. During an interview, on 07/07/23 at 11:56 a.m., the Facility Scheduler indicated the PBJ staffing showed there was no RN staffing coverage for 6 days in February and 3 days in March. She would have to get with the Human Resources Director to verify if the information on the PBJ was correct. During an interview, on 07/07/2023 at 3:41 p.m., the Human Resources Director indicated they did not have RN coverage on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were disposed of according to regulations and standards of practice for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medication observation. (Resident 21) Findings include: During a medication observation, on 07/07/23 at 9:48 a.m., LPN 10 prepared the following medications for Resident 21: furosemide (a medication used to decrease fluid in the body) 20 mg (milligrams), acetaminophen (a mild pain medication) 500 mg, prednisone (a steroid) 5 mg, apixaban (a blood thinner) 2 mg, amiodarone HCL (used for an irregular heartbeat) 200 mg and mixed with pudding. The resident refused the medications due to nausea. The nurse took the medication into the soiled utility room and flushed them down the hopper (a flushing rim sink used for disposal of blood or body fluids) (e.g., bedpan washing). During an interview, on 07/07/23 at 10:00 a.m., LPN 10 indicated she had disposed of them in the hopper before. During an interview, on 07/10/23 at 11:30 a.m., LPN 4 indicated she disposed of refused medications in the biohazard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 55.0≈ chain avg
Health inspection 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.5+1.5 vs chain
The other 3 homes this chain runs (chain average 5.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
LYNCH, MARGARETIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2021
MCCANLESS, CLAIREIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/14/2024
ROMANO, BETTYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/14/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-129.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 44%Medicare 2%Other / private 53%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$509per resident / day
operating cost
$15,488per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$222per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155825. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next