No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Majestic Care Of Lafayette

300 Windy Hill Dr, Lafayette, IN 47905 · For profit - Corporation · 122 certified beds · (765) 477-7791 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (765) 477-7791 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Aug 2023Resident-funds citation (F0565)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
200 Ferry St Ste B · (765) 446-5161 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2800 Old US Highway 231 S · (765) 471-1013 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Pay Less0.7 mi
65 Beck Ln · (765) 474-0677 · Call to confirm hours
Park
115 Sanford St · (765) 490-7509 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
The Deep0.1 mi
2424 US Highway 231 S

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.8%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.9%5.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.4%0.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms82.2%25.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.6%3.9%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.1%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.8%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.0%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.5%3.6%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.4%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.8%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine69.1%79.0%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.4%22.2%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.8%10.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.021.611.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.071.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

12.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
42.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.18U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 42.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 64% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.6%CMS range 8.6–16.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge42.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge33.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge39.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 3.7–14.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.291.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.35
RN hours/ resident / day
0.74
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.11
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.20
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
57.5%
Total nursing turnover
53.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 93.5 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.20 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-28)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-23)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and served to conserve flavor and at a safe and appetizing temperature. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 91 of 92 residents whom received meal trays. Findings include:1. During an observation and interview, on 8/25/25 at 12:01 p.m., a meal tray was removed off a cart and placed on the counter at the nurses' station by Dietary Staff 3. Dietary Staff 3 removed the lid off the plate and proceeded to check the temperature of the food using a thermometer probe. The Salisbury steak registered at 92 degrees Fahrenheit, the whole kernel corn registered at 123.2 degrees Fahrenheit, and the sliced red potatoes registered at 85.2 degrees Fahrenheit. Dietary Staff 3 indicated the temperature of the food was not within range for serving, placed the tray back on the cart, and took it back to the kitchen to warm the food up. On 8/25/25 at 12:18 p.m., a sample tray was tasted. The whole kernel corn was bland, chewy, and cold. The peach cobbler was cold, dry, and lacked flavor. 2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean and comfortable environment was provided in 14 of 27 rooms and common areas reviewed for environment. (room [ROOM NUMBER], 210, 213, 124, 131, 137, 102, 103, and 114)Findings include:During an observation, on 8/22/25 beginning at 12:24 p.m., the following were observed:1. room [ROOM NUMBER] had black scuff marks on the lower portion of the wall below the dry erase board.2. On the cedarwood unit, the shower room door had chipped paint which exposed the wood to the middle and lower portion of the door.3. room [ROOM NUMBER] did not have trim on the wall around the thermostat controlling units. The exposed wall did not have paint and had a black fuzzy growth.4. room [ROOM NUMBER] did not have trim on the wall around the thermostat controlling units. The exposed wall did not have paint and had black and gray discolorations.5. room [ROOM NUMBER] did not have trim on the wall around the thermostat controlling units. The exposed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's representative received notification in writing of the facility's bed hold policy and the reason for the resident's transfer and discharge to the hospital for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 3)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 3 was reviewed on 8/27/25 at 6:49 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus, dementia, chronic kidney disease stage 3, hypertension, osteoarthritis, depression, anxiety, and hyperlipidemia. A nursing progress note, dated 3/14/25 at 6:59 p.m., indicated Resident 3 was hospitalized . The clinical record did not include documentation to indicate the bed hold policy or the reason for transfer was provided to the resident's representative in writing. During an interview, on 8/28/25 at 4:18 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated there was no documentation the bed hold policy or the reason for transfer was provided to the resident representative in writing. A current facility policy, titled Holding Bed Space,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure showers were given according to the scheduled shower days and were accurately documented for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. (Resident C)Findings include:During an interview, on 8/21/25 at 10:40 a.m., Resident C indicated her shower days were scheduled in the morning every Tuesday and Thursday but due to the facility being short staffed, she had not been able to get into the shower to have her hair washed. Resident C indicated she needed a Hoyer lift for transferring which required two staff members. She indicated sometimes she did request a bed bath instead of a shower. Resident C indicated she had filed a grievance before related to not receiving a shower.The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 8/26/25 at 1:34 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, major depressive disorder, metabolic encephalopathy, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.A care plan, dated 9/24/23 and last revised on 7/11/25, indicated Resident C preferred a bed bath. She would refuse showers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were held and laboratory tests were obtained according to the physician's orders for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 28 and 77)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 28 was reviewed on 8/25/25 at 9:53 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease. A care plan, dated 1/24/25, indicated Resident 28 was at risk for impaired cardiac output and to administer medications as ordered, obtain vital signs as ordered, and to notify the physician of abnormalities. A care plan, dated 1/24/25, indicated Resident 28 was receiving Digoxin (a medication used to treat congestive heart failure) and to check the pulse prior to administering the medication. a. A physician's order, dated 1/8/25, indicated to administer Digoxin 125 milligrams (mg) by mouth once a day every Wednesday and Sunday, with instructions to hold the medication for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure routine maintenance inspections which included following the manufacturers' recommendations and specifications for maintaining the bed rails were documented for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for bed rails. (Resident 8 and 10)Findings include:1. During an observation and interview, on 8/22/25 at 10:10 a.m., Resident 8's bed was observed to have bilateral bed rails. Resident 8 indicated the bedrail on the right side (the side of the bed she used to get in and out of the bed) was very loose. She could not recall the last time she had seen a staff member inspect her bedrails. She had not requested a work order for the loose bed rail but indicated the nurses and CNAs knew her bed rail was loose.The clinical record for Resident 8 was reviewed on 8/25/25 at 12:53 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fracture of the left lower leg, displaced fracture of the medial malleolus of the left tibia, and anxiety disorder.A physician's order, dated 9/19/22, indicated Resident 8 was to utilize bed rails as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure irregularities in the drug regimen were recognized, reported, and addressed for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 8 and 28)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 8 was reviewed on 8/25/25 at 12:53 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, bipolar disorder, personal history of pulmonary embolism (a condition in which one or more arteries in the lungs become blocked by a blood clot), and anxiety disorder.a. A care plan, dated 9/11/22, indicated Resident 8 was at risk for increased bruising or bleeding due to anticoagulant therapy. An intervention indicated for the pharmacist to review the medication regime routinely.A physician's order, dated 12/21/23, indicated Resident 8 was to take apixaban (also known as Eliquis, an anticoagulant used to prevent blood clots) every twelve hours for post operative instructions.The medication regimen reviews (MMR), dated 1/1/25 to 8/3/25, were reviewed and there were no irregularities reported related to obtaining a supportive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two step Tuberculous tests were completed following acceptable guidelines for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for infection control. (Resident 25 and 48) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 25 was reviewed on 8/28/25 at 10:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cutaneous abscess of the buttock, necrotizing fasciitis, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, depression, and chronic pain syndrome.The Electronic Health Record (EHR), for Resident 25, indicated:a. the first-step tuberculous test, dated 5/18/25 at 10:15 p.m., was marked as not applicable (NA). The test was documented as read on 5/18/25 at 10:04 p.m. b. the second-step tuberculous test was documented as administered on 5/31/25 at 3:56 a.m. and was read on 6/1/25 at 10:22 p.m., less than 48 hours. 2. The clinical record for Resident 48 was reviewed on 8/28/25 at 2:37 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus, colostomy, depression, hypertension, and presence of a cardiac…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pneumococcal vaccines were administered according to the signed consent form for 4 of 7 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Resident I, 9, 41 and 84) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident I was reviewed on 10/21/24 at 9:56 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, sepsis, acute cystitis with hematuria, cellulitis, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, acute kidney failure, chronic kidney disease stage 3, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, anemia, long term current use of insulin, and essential primary hypertension. An informed consent form for the pneumococcal vaccine, dated 8/19/24, indicated the resident consented to receiving the vaccination. The electronic medical record did not include any record of the administration of the pneumococcal vaccination after the signed consent form on 8/19/24. During an interview, on 10/22/24 at 10:11 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the immunization should have been provided soon after the consent was signed, but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care given to a resident was not completed by a particular staff member according to the resident's preference for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for resident rights. (Resident D) Finding includes: During an interview, on 10/16/24 at 10:14 a.m., Resident D indicated he did not want RN 7 to take care of him and he had informed management staff. RN 7 was still taking care of him. During an interview, on 10/22/24 at 10:12 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated she was aware RN 7 was not supposed to be taking care of Resident D. She was assigned to the hall often but was not to take care of Resident D. The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 10/17/24 at 3:29 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, anxiety disorder and problem related to unspecified psychosocial circumstances. A Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated RN 7 administered Resident D's medications on 9/1, 9/3, 9/4, 9/6, 9/7, 9/8, 9/9, 9/11, 9/20, 9/21, 9/22, 9/23, 10/5, 10/6, 10/12,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff notified the Social Service Director and the resident's physician immediately after the resident expressed suicidal thoughts for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for notification. (Resident 81) Finding includes: During an interview, on 10/21/24 at 10:06 a.m., Resident 81 indicated she told a nurse, on 10/19/24, she felt like killing herself and wanted to get help. She had increased feelings of depression and anxiety and was very upset nothing was done. The clinical record for Resident 81 was reviewed on 10/12/22 at 11:25 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, major depressive disorder and general anxiety. A physician's order, dated 5/18/24, indicated to give 60 milligrams (mg) of duloxetine delayed release for depression daily. A physician's order, dated 10/2/24, indicated to give 10 mg of buspirone for anxiety three times a day. A care plan, dated 7/23/24, indicated the resident was on a psychotropic medication. Interventions included, but were not limited to, monitor for side effects of antidepressant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer the correct amount of oxygen as ordered by the physician for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 5) Finding includes: During an observation, on 10/16/24 at 11:15 a.m., Resident 5's oxygen concentrator (a device used to provide supplemental oxygen therapy) was set on 2 liters per minute (L). During an observation, on 10/17/24 at 9:57 a.m., Resident 5's oxygen concentrator was set on 2.5L. During an observation, on 10/18/24 at 11:31 a.m., Resident 5's oxygen concentrator was set on 2L. The clinical record for Resident 5 was reviewed on 10/17/24 at 3:30 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, interstitial pulmonary disease, chronic pulmonary edema, personal history of malignant neoplasm of other sites of lip, oral cavity and pharynx, gastrostomy status, and dependence on renal dialysis. A care plan, dated 7/12/23, indicated the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff accurately documented on the narcotic count sheets, documented medication administration in the Medication Administration Record, and properly documented the disposal of medication for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pain management. (Resident E) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 10/16/24 at 11:46 a.m. The diagnosis included, but were not limited to, chronic pain syndrome and non-pressure chronic ulcer of foot. a. The following entries were documented in the month of August on a narcotic medication count sheet for Oxycodone (a narcotic medication to treat pain) 5 milligrams: 1. An entry, dated 8/3/24 at 5:00 a.m., indicated one Oxycodone was administered. This administration was not documented in the Medication Administration Record (MAR). 2. An entry, dated 8/3/24 at 6:20 p.m., indicated one Oxycodone was administered. This administration was not documented in the MAR. 3. An entry, dated 8/3/24 at 3:15 p.m., indicated one Oxycodone was administered. This administration was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assisted and received dental services for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dental services. (Resident 8) Finding includes: During an observation, on 10/16/24 at 11:27 a.m., Resident 8 had missing teeth. During an interview, on 10/16/24 at 11:27 a.m., Resident 8 indicated she wanted new dentures. She previously lost a large amount of weight, and her old dentures no longer fit. She indicated she would like to get new ones, but staff had not helped her to find a provider in her insurance network when she asked for assistance. The clinical record for Resident 8 was reviewed on 10/16/24 at 3:02 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, chronic diastolic heart failure, post-traumatic stress disorder, hyperlipidemia, and age-related physical debility. A physician's order, dated 9/19/22, indicated Resident 8 may be seen by a podiatrist, dentist, optometrist, audiologist, psychiatrist, and psychologist. A care plan, dated 9/11/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 room tray tested for temperatures. (100 hall) Findings include: During an interview, on 10/16/24 at 10:54 a.m., Resident E indicated the food was usually cold, especially for room trays. During an interview, on 10/16/24 at 2:53 p.m., Resident 48 indicated the food was cold a lot. During a resident council meeting, on 10/18/24 at 2:35 p.m., the resident council indicated the food was cold, even when eating in the dining room. During an observation and interview, on 10/16/24 at 12:40 p.m., a lunch tray was chosen to get food temperatures. The ravioli temped at 116 degrees. The dietary manager indicated hot foods should be served at least 120 degrees or above. A facility policy, titled Food: Quality and Palatability, last revised on 2/2023 and received from the Director of Nursing on 10/16/24 at 3:30 p.m., indicated .Food will be prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor and appearance. Food will be palatable, attractive and served at a safe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document mood and behaviors in the Electric Health Records (EHR) for 1 of 1 resident with suicidal thoughts. (Residents 81) Finding includes: During an interview, on 10/21/24 at 10:06 a.m., Resident 81 indicated she told a nurse, on 10/19/24, she felt like killing herself and wanted to get help. The resident was very upset. The clinical record for Resident 81 was reviewed on 10/12/24 at 11:25 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, major depressive disorder and general anxiety. A physician's order, dated 5/18/24, indicated to give 60 milligrams (mg) of duloxetine delayed release for depression daily. A physician's order, dated 10/2/24, indicated to give 10 mg of buspirone for anxiety three times a day. There was nothing documented in the EHR about the thoughts and feeling Resident 81 was having. During an interview, on 10/21/24 at 11:21 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the staff should document the resident's mood and behavior in the medical records and nothing was charted. A current policy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff transported soiled linen down the hall correctly and staff wore PPE (personal protective equipment) into an isolation room for 3 of 3 randomly observed staff. (CNA 12, 13 and 14) Findings include 1. During an observation, on 10/18/24 at 11:45 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 12 was observed dragging a large clear trash bag of dirty linen down the 100 hall and placed the bag into the soiled utility room. During an interview, on 10/18/24 at 11:48 a.m., CNA 12 indicated she should not drag dirty linen down the hall. During an interview, on 10/18/24 at 11:49 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the CNA was not supposed to drag dirty linen down the hall. 2. During an observation, on 10/18/24 at 11:52 a.m., Resident G was in Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). CNA 13 and CNA 14 was in the resident's room transferring the resident from her wheelchair to the bed. The CNAs were not wearing PPE when touching the resident, wheelchair, and bed. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 6 entered the room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Covid-19 vaccines were provided when requested for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Resident 65, 83 and 84) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 65 was reviewed on 10/21/24 at 9:56 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, recurrent moderate major depressive disorder, vitamin D deficiency, vitamin B12 deficiency anemia, prolonged grief disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, essential primary hypertension, and age-related physical debility. An informed consent form for the Covid-19 vaccine, dated 1/13/23, indicated the resident consented to receiving the vaccination. An informed consent form for the Covid-19 vaccine, dated 11/20/23, indicated the resident consented to receiving the vaccination. The electronic medical record did not include any record of a Covid-19 vaccination after the signed consent form in January or November 2023. During an interview, on 10/22/24 at 10:11 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the immunization should have been provided soon after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure incontinence products and personal items were stored appropriately, light bulbs were in working use, and trash was not on the ground for 5 of 70 rooms reviewed for environment (Rooms 112, 123, 134, 138, and 233). Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 10/16/24 at 11:07 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] had incontinence products, and an opened package of briefs stored on the bed next to the resident. 2. During an observation, on 10/16/24 at 10:29 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] had a foul smell and the light above the bed had 2 light bulbs not working. 3. During an observation, on 10/16/24 at 10:49 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] had paint on the floor, clothes not hung up, the closet was a mess, and items were on the floor. 4. During an observation, on 10/16/24 at 10:46 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] had briefs stored on the ground in the bathroom, a toothbrush and a hairbrush with other supplies were stored in a wire basket on the back of the toilet. 5. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Residents J, K, L, and M) Finding include: 1. An Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) reportable, dated 8/17/2023, indicated Resident J did not receive personal care when she needed to be changed on 8/16/2023. Resident B needed personal care when her ostomy bag leaked in her bed. She indicated CNA 2 did not provide her with care. CNA was terminated when the allegation was substantiated. The record for Resident J was reviewed on 9/12/2023 at 2:15 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, bipolar disorder, and hemiplegia. The resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14. This score indicated the resident was not cognitively impaired. During an interview, on 9/12/2023 at 3:50 p.m., Resident J indicated her ostomy bag had leaked in her bed and she called for assistance. CNA 2 came to assist her. CNA 2 she did not clean her bed or change her linen. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide continuous oxygen flow for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for continuous oxygen per physician's orders at 2 liters. (Residents B and D) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident B was reviewed on 9/11/2023 at 4:05 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute kidney failure, anemia, end stage renal disease, and hyperkalemia. The resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14. This score indicated the resident was not cognitively impaired. Nursing notes indicated Resident B had a physician's order, dated 8/16/2023, for oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula continuous, may titrate as needed. During an interview, on 9/11/2023 at 4:01 p.m., Resident B was observed to have oxygen at 2 liters with continuous flow per nasal cannula while she was in bed in her room. She indicated she did not get continuous oxygen when she went to the dialysis center for her treatment. When she left her room, her oxygen was disconnected and then she was reconnected to oxygen when it was her turn…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident council grievances had a response for 7 of 7 months reviewed for resident council grievances. (January 2023 through July 2023) Findings include: The resident council meeting minutes were reviewed, on 8/14/23 at 1:00 p.m., for the months of January 2023 through July 2023. The resident council meeting minutes, dated January 2023, indicated there were concerns the call lights and medication pass took too long, showers were not consistent, food portions were still too small, the kitchen did not follow the menus, the rooms needed cleaned, soap and toilet paper needed refilled, clothes were lost, and rooms needed to be mopped. There were no documented responses. The resident council meeting minutes, dated February 2023, indicated there were concerns the call light responses were too long, CNAs had bad attitudes especially at night (overnight), showers were missed and residents were not asked about showers, small portions were served, meals…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    3. During an observation and interview, on 8/09/23 at 1:58 p.m., Resident 63 was sitting in her room with the door shut. The resident indicated she enjoyed activities but the staff quit and now she stayed in her room except to go to dialysis. The resident was not reminded of the activities, and needed someone to take her. The CNAs told her they were too busy. The record for Resident 63 was reviewed on 8/14/23 at 11:53 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure, chronic pulmonary edema, dependent on renal dialysis, hypertension, cardiac pacemaker, and macular degeneration. A care plan, dated as revised on 8/9/23, indicated the resident was to be involved in group activities. The goal included to provide assistance or escort to activity functions, provide verbal reminders of time and place of activity. The Activity Participation Follow Up Question Report, for 7/1/23 to 8/15/23, indicated activities did not occur from 8/8/23 to 8/15/23. The resident had 8 days of no documented activities. During an interview, on 8/10/23 at 2:40 p.m., the DON indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was enough staff to address concerns identified by the resident council group for 7 of 7 resident council meetings reviewed, to provide incontinence care as identified by grievance concerns for 5 of 5 grievances reviewed, and to provide toileting needs for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for bowel and bladder. (Resident C and E) Findings include: 1. There were no documented responses to concerns from January 2023 to July 2023 from the resident council group meetings. During the resident council meetings, from January 2023 through July 2023, the resident council indicated there were concerns about call lights taking a long time, medication pass taking too long, showers not consistently done, the rooms needed cleaned and soap and toilet paper needed refilled. No follow up was done for their concerns. During the resident council interview, on 8/16/23 at 2:00 p.m., the resident council group indicated there was a lack of communication with residents and staff. The residents did not feel they could communicate with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided and the residents were free from negative comments by staff for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for dignity. (Resident C and F) Findings include: 1. During an interview, on 8/10/23 at 2:44 p.m., Resident C indicated during the second shift she had her call light on. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3 came to the door and told the resident she was just changed about 10 minutes ago, and she would come back in 2 hours and change her. The resident told CNA 3 she had a bowel movement and told her she needed to be changed. CNA 3 walked in the room, turned the call light off, and told the resident she only had to change her every two hours and left the room. The record for Resident C was reviewed on 8/14/23 at 3:45 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, clostridium difficile colitis (inflammation of the colon caused by bacteria which causes diarrhea), diabetes mellitus, and fracture of the upper end of the left humerus (the largest bone of the upper arm). A physician's order, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to fully investigate an allegation of abuse for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident C and F) Finding includes: 1. During an interview, on 8/10/23 at 2:44 p.m., Resident C indicated during second shift (2-10 p.m.) her call light was on. CNA 3 came to the door and told the resident she was changed about 10 minutes ago, and she would come back in 2 hours and change her. The resident told CNA 3 she had a bowel movement and she needed to be changed. CNA 3 walked in the room, turned the call light off, and told the resident she only had to change her every two hours then CNA 3 left the room. The record for Resident C was reviewed on 8/14/23 at 3:45 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, clostridium difficile colitis (inflammation of the colon caused by bacteria which causes diarrhea), diabetes mellitus, and fracture of the upper end of the left humerus (the largest bone of the upper arm). A Facility Incident Report indicated, on 8/9/23, Resident C indicated a staff member entered the room to answer her call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care was coordinated with Hospice staff for obtaining a positioning chair and to document follow-up for a resident with left arm swelling for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for Hospice. (Resident 5 and 15) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 8/10/23 at 10:36 a.m., Resident 5 had left arm swelling on the side where her dialysis fistula was located. The resident's right arm was much smaller than the left arm. The record for Resident 5 was reviewed on 8/15/23 at 3:47 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, chronic respiratory failure, and chronic congestive heart failure. A physician's order, dated 7/6/23, indicated the resident had a dialysis fistula located in the left arm and to check the fistula every shift for thrill (feeling the motion of blood with the fingers) and bruit (a whooshing sound), swelling, pain, change in temperature, and/or bleeding. A progress note, dated 8/11/23 at 1:44 p.m., indicated the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. The record for Resident 57 was reviewed on 08/11/23 at 9:20 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral palsy, and left-hand contracture. A physician order, dated 7/7/23, indicated a palm protector was to be in the left hand donned upon bed and doffed upon rising. An electronic Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated July 2023, indicated there was no documentation by the staff for the placement or removal of the palm protector. An electronic MAR, dated August 2023, indicated there was no documentation by the staff for the placement or removal of the palm protector. During an interview, on 08/15/23 at 3: 39 p.m., Nurse 5 indicated she had not seen a palm protector for the resident. A current policy, titled Use of Assistive Devices, not dated and received from the Director of Nursing on 8/15/23 at 4:18 p.m., indicated .the use of devices would be based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, in accordance with the resident's plan of care .the facility will provide assistive devices for resident's who need them .nursing, dietary, social services, and therapy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's oxygen was set at the physician ordered liters per minute (LPM) and the oxygen tanks were stored safely for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for oxygen. (Resident 15) Finding includes: During an observation, on 8/9/23 at 1:34 p.m., Resident 15's oxygen (02) was set at 4 LPM. The resident indicated the 02 should be at 3 LPM. During an observation and interview, on 8/9/23 at 1:47 p.m., the resident's 02 was still at 4 LPM and RN 6 indicated the resident's oxygen was supposed to be set at 3 LPM. The record for Resident 15 was reviewed on 8/11/23 at 11:23 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low 02 content in the blood), chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia (excessive carbon dioxide in the bloodstream), congestive heart failure, and anxiety disorder. A physician's order, dated 7/19/23, indicated 02 at 3 LPM by nasal cannula. A care plan, dated 12/15/21 and last revised on 4/24/23, indicated the resident was at risk for respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received routine oral care and follow up dental visits for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dental services. (Resident 14) Finding includes: During an observation, on 8/9/23 at 1:10 p.m., Resident 14 had very blackened bottom teeth, missing teeth and partial tooth pieces. There was a very foul odor noted when the resident was smiling and attempting to speak. During an interview, on 8/10/23 at 4:42 p.m., the resident's family member indicated the facility did not help the resident with her teeth and did not even give her a toothbrush at bedtime. The resident's teeth were really bad and she needed dental work. The place the facility sent her to could not do anything. The record for Resident 14 was reviewed on 8/11/23 at 3:02 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness) following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting the right dominant side, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and vascular dementia. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure rooms were free from urine odors, free from dirty clothes on the floor and bedside tables, free from cardboard boxes on the floor and stacked on a plastic bin, personal belongings scattered in rooms, dirty clothes and a pillow on the floor for 6 of 6 rooms and failed to ensure flooring was replaced for 1 of 2 units reviewed for environment. (Rooms 105, 106, 108A, 110B, 112, 214, and the Cedarwood Unit) Findings include: During room observations, starting on 08/10/23 at 10:41 a.m., the following were observed: a. room [ROOM NUMBER] had a slight urine odor. b. room [ROOM NUMBER] had clothes all over the floor and the side of room, bed sheets were rolled up and a food tray was still sitting on the bedside table. c. room [ROOM NUMBER]A had a lot of clutter in the room, items were on the floor and chairs. The clothing and other personal belongings were unorganized. Two large cardboard boxes were stacked on top of each other, and another large cardboard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-08-16 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure posted staffing data had the actual worked hours per shift for 3 of 3 months reviewed for staffing. (6/4/23 through 8/9/23). Findings include: During an observation, on 8/9/23 at 12:00 p.m., the census and staffing hours form posted at the main entrance, dated 6/4/23, indicated there were 94 residents, 2 RN's (Registered Nurses), 1 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), and 9 CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistant)/QMAs (Qualified Medication Assistant) with a total of 91.5 hours worked for the day shift. The evening shift had 1 RN, 2.5 LPNs, and 9 CNAs/QMAs for total of 64 hours worked. The night shift had 1 RN, 2 LPNs and 5 CNAs/QMAs for a total of 64 hours worked. The staffing hours and census form did not provide actual worked hours and the numbers indicated half staff members (2.5 LPNs) posted. During an interview, on 8/10/23 at 11:11 a.m., the Clinical Support Nurse indicated the staffing posted was from 6/4/23 and he did not know why the staffing had not been updated. During an observation, on 8/11/23, the census and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+11.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.6M
Related-party expense20% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 81%Medicare 7%Other / private 12%

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$375per resident / day
operating cost
$11,405per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$425per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155243. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next