No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Poplar Care Strategies

313 Poplar St, Loogootee, IN 47553 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 62 certified beds · (812) 295-4433 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$8,021 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,021 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-09)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
104 Wood St · (812) 295-2955 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
402 W Broadway St · (812) 295-4600 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
600 W Broadway St · (812) 295-3030 · Call to confirm hours
Park
702 Park St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased33.0%11.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.7%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.9%1.1%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms12.7%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.9%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened43.8%11.9%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication30.8%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.9%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers10.4%3.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.0%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table37.5%13.6%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.1%79.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.5%22.2%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.5%10.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.501.611.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.501.441.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 51 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
40.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.51U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.23hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 40.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.8%CMS range 41.8–64.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.1–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge40.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge40.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge37.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified83.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 3.6–13.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.171.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.55
RN hours/ resident / day
1.52
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.55
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.63
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.32
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 34.3 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.549 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.55 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-08)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-01)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and a secured environment was in place to prevent a resident with dementia from exiting the facility and leaving the property. On 9/3/24, after being last seen by facility staff around 2:20 P.M., a resident exited the facility and was not realized to be missing until 3:15 P.M. when a search for the resident began. The resident was located by the Activity Director approximately 200 yards off facility property along a gravel road. (Resident C) This Immediate Jeopardy began on 9/3/24 when the facility failed to ensure Resident C did not exit the facility through an unsecured door toward the back of the building, located near the facility kitchen, and either walked behind or wheeled herself off the property and approximately 200 yards along a gravel road. The Activity Director located Resident C in a wheelchair alongside the gravel road while searching in a vehicle. Resident C was returned to the facility without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for 1 of 3 newly admitted residents reviewed. A basline care plan assessment was not completed and plan of care was not in place specific to the individualized resident needs. (Resident B)Finding includes:During record review on 4/28/26 at 11:00 A.M., Resident B's diagnoses included, but was not limited to heart failure and anxiety. Resident B was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Resident B had no baseline care plan in place pertaining to the resident's care needs.Resident B's Interim Care plan assessment, dated 4/21/26, was initiated but was not completed. During an interview on 4/29/26 at 12:15 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the admitting nurse usually completed the Interim Care plan assessment and that would initiate an individualized interim care plan. On 4/29/26 at 12:51 P.M., the Facility Administrator supplied a facility policy titled, Care Plans - Baseline,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent accident hazards for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. A resident with supplemental oxygen was placed in a room with another resident with a documented history of non-compliance with the facility's non-smoking policy, which included the possecion of a vape pen in the resident room. The resident was alleged to be smoking in the resident's shared restroom and smoke was observed coming from the restroom while an oxygen concentrator was running in the resident's room. (Resident B, Resident C)Findings include:1. During an observation on 4/28/26 at 10:30 A.M., Resident B and Resident C were observed in the same room. Resident B was wearing supplemental oxygen received from an oxygen concentrator in the room. A sign outside the room door indicate no smoking was allowed due to the oxygen in use. During record review on 4/28/26 at 11:00 A.M., Resident B's diagnoses included, but was not limited to heart failure and anxiety. Resident B's vital signs included but were not limited to, on 4/25/26 during day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving oxygen therapy had physician orders and a plan of care for the oxygen for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. A resident who routinely received supplemental oxygen had no physician's order to clarify the continuous need for oxygen therapy or for the amount of oxygen the resident required. (Resident B)Finding incudes:During an observation on 4/28/26 at 10:30 A.M., Resident B and Resident C were observed in the same room. Resident B was wearing supplemental oxygen received from an oxygen concentrator in the room and delivered via nasal cannula. During record review on 4/28/26 at 11:00 A.M., Resident B's diagnoses included, but was not limited to heart failure and anxiety. Resident B's vital signs included but were not limited to, resident received oxygen via nasal cannula daily, every shift, from the admission dated 4/21/26 through the review date 4/28/26. Resident B's physician orders did not included an order for routine supplemental oxygen and no clarification for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident privacy for 4 of 4 random observations. Staff did not knock on doors prior to entering, and doors and curtains were not closed during a wound dressing change. (Resident 21, Resident 3, Resident 9, Resident 10)Findings include:1. On 1/6/26 at 3:19 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 17 and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 18 were observed to enter Resident 21's room without knocking. Resident 21 was in the room at that time. 2. On 1/5/26 at 10:09 A.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 25 was observed to enter Resident 21's room without knocking. Resident 21 was in the room at the time. On 1/7/26 at 9:23 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) 21 was observed to enter Resident 21's room without knocking. Resident 21 was in the room at the time. On 1/7/26 at 9:35 A.M., the Maintenance Assistant was observed to enter Resident 21's room without knocking. Resident 21 was in the room at the time. 3. On 1/6/26 at 3:18 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 7 was observed to enter Resident 10's room without knocking. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0680 — pattern
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Activity Director was certified for 1 of 1 Activity Director reviewed. (Activity Director)Finding includes: During an interview on 1/5/26 at 1:30 P.M, the Administrator indicated the Activities Director had recently resigned, and the Activities Assistant was currently overseeing the activities.During an interview on 1/5/26 at 2:00 P.M., the Activities Assistant indicated she was not certified, and the facility currently lacked an Activities Director.During an interview on 1/7/26 at 10:03 A.M., the Administrator indicated 12/12/25 was the previous Activity's Director last day she worked. The facility had not utilized a consultant after she resigned.On 1/8/26 at 10:53 A.M., employee records were reviewed and lacked a current Activity Director.On 1/8/26 at 11:53 A.M., the Administrator provided a current, undated Nursing Home Activities: Resident Rights and the Role of Activities Staff policy that indicated, .The activities program must be directed by a qualified professional who is a qualified therapeutic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an infection control program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 of 5 residents observed for incontinence care, and 1 of 2 residents observed for a wound dressing change. Staff did not sanitize hands between glove changes, did not wear required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), and placed a resident's open wound on bed linen. (Resident 25, Resident 3, Resident 21, Resident 27)Findings include:1. On 1/5/26 at 10:19 A.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 25 was observed to assist Resident 3 out of bed and to the toilet. The room was observed with EBP signs just outside the doorway, and a cart with PPE. CNA 25 did not wear a gown during care. Resident 3 was assisted to the bathroom and onto the toilet. CNA 25 removed a soiled brief while the resident was sat on the toilet. While putting on the clean brief, CNA 25 scraped the inside and outside of the clean brief on the floor prior to placing it over the resident's feet. The clean brief was then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, sanitary, and a homelike environment for residents, staff, and visitors for 6 of 10 rooms observed. (Room A1, Room A4, Room B2, Room B3, Room B6, Room F2)Findings include:1. On 1/5/26 at 10:19 A.M., Room A1 (shared by 3 residents) was observed with a strong odor of urine, brown substance smeared on raised toilet seat with handles at 2, 7, and 9 o' clock, and down the front of the toilet, 2 unlabeled bottles of moisturizing shampoo and body wash, an open tube of over the counter lotion and another unlabeled rash ointment on the back of the toilet, dust caked on the exhaust fan, the call light string was brown, and there were blue splatters on the wall to left of toilet and down the front of the toilet, and the tiles around the base of the toilet were brown. On 1/6/25 at 3:09 P.M., Room A1 was observed with a strong odor of urine, dust caked on the exhaust fan, the call light string was brown, and the tiles around the base of the toilet were brown. 2. On 1/5/26 at 1:49 P.M., Room A4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity when being spoken to. During 1 of 1 random interview, a resident indicated staff spoke harshly to residents during care, were short with residents, and cursed. These actions led the resident to feel angry. (Resident B)Findings include:On 1/7/26 at 10:13 A.M., Resident B indicated concern that a few un-named staff members had spoken harshly with residents. She indicated she had not directly observed the treatment, but had heard it from her room and from the hallway. She indicated Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) had been overheard telling residents to shut your mouth and forcing residents to go to bed when they did not want to. She indicated the CNAs could be heard being hateful and speaking bad to other residents, often cursing and being short with them. She indicated the behavior had been going on for several months, and although grievances had been filed regarding the situation, as well as being brought up in resident council meetings, the behavior had continued. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents that were self administering medications were assessed for capability to self administer medications for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 32)Findings include: On 1/5/26 at 10:10 A.M., Resident 32 was observed sitting in his wheelchair with oxygen on via nasal cannula. At that time, a nasal spray (fluticasone propionate 50 micrograms (mcg) per spray) was observed on the bedside table. Resident 32 indicated he used the nasal spray whenever he needed to.On 1/6/26 at 8:08 A.M., Resident 32's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, asthma.The most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/26/25, indicated Resident 32 was cognitively intact.Resident 32's clinical record lacked a current order for fluticasone propionate.Resident 32's clinical record lacked a care plan related to self-administering medications.Resident 32's clinical record lacked a self-administration assessment.During an interview on 1/8/26 at 9:15 A.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident that was dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received necessary care to maintain their personal hygiene for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for ADL care. A dependent resident with Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD) was not offered or toileted every two hours as ordered. (Resident 27)Finding includes: On 1/7/26 at 9:09 A.M., Resident 27's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, osteoarthritis and dementia without behaviors.The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/26/25, indicated Resident 27's cognition was severely impaired, she was substantial/maximum assistance of staff (staff performs over half of the effort) for toileting, transfers, always incontinent of bowel and bladder, no behaviors of rejecting care, and had MASD skin conditions.Current physician's orders included, but were not limited to, the following:Offer to assist resident with toileting needs every two hours and as needed every day and night…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent and treat a facility acquired pressure ulcer for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Skin assessments were not completed and a resident's plan of care was not followed and revised to monitor and assess the resident's right ankle pressure ulcer. (Resident 7)Finding includes:On 1/6/26 at 9:53 A.M., Resident 7's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behaviors, polyneuropathy, and Stage II (Partial thickness loss of skin, which may present as a blister or shallow open sore) pressure ulcer. The stage of pressure listed was an inaccurate diagnosis. The resident had a Stage III (full-thickness loss of skin occurs, potentially exposing fat tissue. The ulcer may appear as a deep crater) pressure ulcer/injury.The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/30/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact, dependent on staff assistance for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent falls for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for accidents. Fall interventions were not in place for a resident with multiple falls, a fall assessment was not completed after a fall, and an interdisciplinary note was not completed after a fall. (Resident 23)Findings include:During an observation on 1/05/2026 10:07 AM Resident 23 was observed in the common area with a staff member. She had fall socks on and a fall alarm attached to her wheelchair.On 1/5/26 at 3:21 P.M., Resident 23's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limit to, fracture of the right pubis, dementia, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and unsteadiness on feet.The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/18/25, indicated Resident 23 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for transfers and toileting.Resident 23's Physician's Orders included, but was not limited to,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's plan of care for nutrition was followed for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for nutrition. A resident with weight loss was not receiving the diet and supplements ordered, the resident was not being weighed weekly as ordered, and the care plan was not revised. (Resident 7)Finding includes:On 1/6/26 at 9:53 A.M., Resident 7's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behaviors, polyneuropathy, and pressure ulcer.The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/30/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact, supervision of staff for eating, dependent on staff assistance for showering, transfers, toileting, 137 pounds (lbs), 64 inches tall, had weight loss (not on prescribed regimen), no swallowing disorder, and not on a therapeutic diet.Current physician's orders included, but were not limited to, the following:Regular diet, regular texture, thin consistency, give double portions of protein with meals, initiated 1/21/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safe, secure, and orderly storage of medications in 1 of 3 medication carts observed and 1 of 2 medication storage rooms observed. (East Hall medication storage room, [NAME] Hall medication cart)Findings include:1. During an observation on 10/9/25 at 11:20 A.M., the Hall 1 medication cart contained the medications Alka-[NAME], melatonin, and Dulcolax. The medications were contained in an original box with Resident D's name handwritten on the box. No labeling containing ordered dosage, route, frequency of administration, or prescriber name were on the medication. During an interview on 10/9/25 at 11:25 A.M., QMA 4 indicated Resident D's family had brought the unlabeled medications into the facility for the resident and that the resident did not have a physician's order to receive the medications. During record review on 10/9/25 at 12:00 P.M., Resident D's physician orders did not include orders for the resident to receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained during 1 of 2 observations of care. Staff failed to complete hand hygiene after removal (doffing) of used gloves and prior to putting on (donning) new gloves and staff failed to complete hand hygiene immediately after doffing used gloves and prior to opening a resident's desk drawer and handing the resident a hair comb. (Resident B)Findings include:During an observation on 8/28/25 at 10:40 A.M., CNA 4 and CNA 5 were assisting Resident B to use the commode in the resident's bedroom bathroom. Resident B was assisted from a wheelchair to stand in front of the commode. CNA 4 and CNA 5 lowered resident's pants and brief and assisted Resident B to sit on the commode. CNA 4 and CNA 5 then assisted Resident B to stand, and CNA 5 provided perineal care. CNA 5 then encouraged Resident B to keep standing while CNA 5 doffed the gloves used prior and donned new gloves. No hand hygiene was completed between glove changes. CNA 5 then and CNA 4 then assisted Resident B by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate care was provided to prevent and treat new pressure wounds for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure wounds. Initial observations of deteriorating skin areas were not documented or communicated, initial wound care was not documented following the development of pressure wounds, and ordered treatments were not completed for pressure wounds. (Resident D, Resident F) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 2/18/25 at 10:30 A.M., QMA 4 indicated that Resident D had multiple wounds. During an observation and interview on 2/18/25 at 3:30 P.M., Resident D was lying in bed with heel protector boots on each foot. Resident D indicated there were wounds on her feet and coccyx. Resident D's record review indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, type II diabetes, need for assistance with personal care, obesity, and neurofunctional disorder of bladder. Resident D's most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/20/24, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-01 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a qualified Infection Preventionist working at least part-time at that facility. Finding includes: On 10/28/24 9:45 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated she was the facility's appointed Infection Preventionist (IP) and full time DON. On 4/5/24 at 10:08 A.M., the DON indicated she it varied from week to week on how many hours were spent for IP duties, but she does not spend as much time on IP duties as she would like to. At that time, she indicated she did not have any documentation of hours worked as an IP. On 11/1/24 at 10:23 A.M., the DON provided a current, undated Infection Preventionist job description that indicated, An Infection Preventionist is an individual responsible for the Infection Prevention and Control Program, developed to control the spread of infections and/or outbreaks .

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who did not have a gradual dose reduction for psychotropic medications had a clinical contraindication documented for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 12) Finding includes: On 10/29/24 at 10:38 A.M., Resident 12's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, anxiety and depression. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 9/5/24, indicated no cognitive impairment, and use of an antianxiety medication. No gradual dose reduction (GDR) information was listed. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Alprazolam 0.5mg (milligram) twice a day, dated 4/8/23. A nurse's note, dated 1/29/24, indicated a GDR recommendation was received to decrease alprazolam 0.5mg to 0.25mg. The GDR request was denied due to attempting this would not be in the best interest for this resident. On 10/30/24 at 1:17 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated no other contraindication for GDR was located in Resident 12's clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 1 kitchens observed. Hairnets did not cover hair, food temperature log was not completed for all meals, measuring devices/scoops were stored inside containers of ice, oats, sugar, thickener, and bread was touched with bare hands. (Kitchen) Findings include: 1. During an observation of the kitchen on 10/28/24 at 9:43 A.M., two dietary staff members had hair outside of their hairnets at their temples and nape of the neck. During an observation of the kitchen on 10/31/24 at 11:05 A.M., two dietary staff members had hair outside of their hairnets at their temples and nape of the neck. 2. On 10/28/24 at 9:53 A.M., the food temperature log was reviewed from October 1 through October 27, 2024 and lacked food temperatures for the following meals: 10/21/24 lunch 10/22/24 dinner 10/23/24 breakfast and lunch 10/24/24 breakfast and dinner 10/25/24 breakfast, lunch, and dinner 10/26/24 breakfast, lunch, and dinner 10/27/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 3 residents observed for incontinence care. Staff did not use hand hygiene between glove changes during care and did not change gloves after touching multiple items before starting incontinence care. (Resident 13, Resident 27, Resident 15). Findings include: 1. On 10/30/24 at 9:20 A.M., CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) 5 and CNA 7 were observed doing incontinence care for Resident 13. Both CNAs cleaned their hands with sanitizer as they entered Resident 13's room. Both CNAs put on gloves. CNA 7 pulled the curtain around the resident, pushed the bed away from the wall, went behind the bed and pulled the covers down. CNA 5 used the remote to put the head of the bed down and raise the bed. They did not change gloves before starting care. CNA 7 unfastened the brief, pushed it down between her legs and assisted Resident 13 to turn to the right side. CNA 5 removed the brief, took a wipe and cleaned…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and home-like environment for 5 of 5 halls and 1 of 1 Dining Rooms reviewed for environment. Personal items were not labeled in shared bathrooms, vent fans were caked with dust, toilets were soiled, non-skid strips were peeling up and/or worn, paint was missing, and incontinence pads were stored uncovered in the shower rooms. (A Hall, B Hall, C Hall, E Hall, F Hall, Dining Room) Findings include: 1. On 10/28/24 at 10:35 A.M., the following was observed in Room B6 and shared bathroom (3 residents) with Room B4: the second non-skid strip by bed closest to the window was peeling up and covered in debris, non-skid strip in bathroom in front of toilet was worn, paint around door frame was peeling and missing in spots, caulk around toilet was brown and soiled and peeling, black and brown stains on the inside of the toilet bowl, a brown substance was smeared on the back of the seat, black scuff marks were along the bottom of the wall and paint was scratched off the same wall across from the toilet, vent fan was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise resident's plan of care for 3 of 17 resident care plans reviewed. Care plans were not revised to reflect discontinued medications, and alarms were in use without an order or care plan. (Resident 29, Resident 1, Resident 2) Findings include: 1. On 10/28/24 at 11:40 A.M., Resident 29's clinical record was reviewed. admission date was 8/22/24 after a fall from home that resulted in a fracture. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, dementia, depression, and history of falling. The most recent admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 9/11/24, indicated a moderate cognitive impairment and a fall prior to admission. Resident 29 required substantial to maximum assistance with bathing, bed mobility, transferring, and toileting. Discontinued orders included, but were not limited to: Bed/Chair Alarms, two times a day for fall risk, dated 8/23/24 through 9/4/24. A current risk for falls care plan, dated 8/26/24, lacked an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practicefor 3 of 3 residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. The facility failed to obtain a Physician's Order for oxygen, failed to follow Physician Orders for oxygenation, and failed to properly store a nebulizer mouthpiece and oxygen tubing while not in use. (Resident 6, Resident 28, Resident 133) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 10/28/24 at 2:08 P.M., Resident 133 was observed in bed with oxygen on via nasal cannula at 2 LPM (Liters per minute). During an observation on 10/29/24 at 11:58 A.M., Resident 133 was observed in the dining room with oxygen on via nasal cannula at 1.5 LPM. At that time, QMA (Qualified Medication Aide) 3 indicated she needed to verify the Physician's Order, but she thought Resident 133's oxygen should be set at 2 LPM. During an interview on 10/29/24 at 12:01 P.M., QMA 3 verified the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services met the needs of each resident for 2 of 4 residents observed for medication administration and 2 of 2 residents who had medication supplies disrupted without permission. Staff obtained medications for residents from other residents supplies. (Resident 22, Resident 233, Resident 27, Resident 24) Findings include: On 10/30/24 at 8:09 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) 27 was observed to administer medications. While obtaining medications for Resident 22, RN 27 indicated the resident's Miralax could not be located. RN 27 then obtained the Miralax dose from another resident's bottle (Resident 24) to administer to Resident 22. At that time, RN 27 indicated Resident 22's Miralax was on an auto refill and should have been at the facility, but would contact the pharmacy for the medication. On 10/30/24 at 8:22 A.M., RN 27 was observed to obtain medications for Resident 233 and indicated the resident's Colace could not be located. RN 27 then obtained the dose of Colace from another resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy and dignity for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for resident abuse. Staff members recorded video footage in resident's restroom while the resident can be identified in the background on the commode. (Resident B) Finding includes: On 8/9/24 at 10:05 A.M., during a review of facility grievances, a grievance dated 8/1/24, concerning Resident B indicated that an anonymous community member brought a recording of a video that was seen on a social media site to the Business Office Manager (BOM). During record review on 8/9/24 at 10:15 A.M., Resident B's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, overactive bladder, and anxiety. Resident B's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/14/24, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident B's nurse's progress notes included a note, dated 8/1/24 at 5:30 P.M., included that a staff member had notified the Power of Attorney (POA), physician, law enforcement, and state agency about an allegation. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-08 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services of an RN (Registered Nurse) were available at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 5 of the days reviewed from the PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Data Report during Quarter 4 of 2023 (July 1, 2023 through September 30, 2023). Finding includes: On 1/4/24 at 4:45 P.M., the [NAME] report was reviewed and indicated there was not an RN for 8 consecutive hours on the following dates: 7/3/23 8/5/23 8/6/23 8/18/23 8/27/23 9/10/23 9/16/23 9/17/23 9/21/23 9/23/23 9/24/23 9/30/23 On 1/3/24 at 9:15 A.M., the Time Card Report from 7/1/23 through 9/30/23 was provided by the Administrator. Review of the Time Card Report indicated there was no RN coverage for 7/3/23, 8/27/23, 9/10/23, 9/23/23 and 9/24/23. During an interview on 1/8/24 at 2:00 P.M., the Administrator indicated there should be an RN scheduled 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. On 1/8/24 at 3:48 P.M., a policy for RN Coverage was requested and not received. The Administrator indicated they follow state regulations. 3.1-17(b)(3)

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-08 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate submission of all direct care staffing data into the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) system for the reported 4th Quarter period of July 1, 2023 through September 30, 2023. Every day from July 1, 2023 through September 30, 2023 was triggered in error for licensed nursing coverage 24 hours per day due to a reporting error. Finding includes: On 1/3/24 at 8:15 A.M., review of the facility's PBJ information indicated licensed nursing coverage for 24 hours per day was triggered daily in the 4th reporting quarter of July 1, 2023 through September 30, 2023. During an interview on 1/3/24 at 8:40 A.M., the Administrator indicated they had licensed staff in the facility every day, and she had reported to their corporate office that there was an issue with reporting staff, but nothing was done to correct the issue. On 1/4/24 at 4:45 P.M., the Time Card Report for July 1, 2023 through September 30, 2023 was reviewed and indicated there was licensed staffing in the facility daily during that period. On 1/8/24 at 3:52 P.M., a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-08 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure MDS (minimum data set) Assessments accurately reflected resident's status for 5 of 13 resident assessments reviewed. (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 4, Resident 25, Resident 10) Findings include: 1. On 1/8/24 at 10:00 A.M., Resident 1's clinical record was reviewed. admission date was 11/28/23. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, bipolar and schizophrenia. The most recent admission MDS Assessment indicated no PASRR (preadmission screening and resident review) Level 2 had been completed. A PASRR Level 2, completed 11/29/23, was observed in Resident 1's clinical record. 2. On 1/4/24 at 11:19 A.M., Resident 2's clinical record was reviewed. The most recent quarterly/state optional MDS Assessment, dated 12/5/23, indicated a current stage 3 pressure ulcer. On 1/5/24 at 11:52 A.M., Resident 2's most recent four weeks of wound assessments for a left heel pressure ulcer were reviewed. All assessments indicated the pressure ulcer was a stage 2. On 1/5/24 at 2:13 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe and secure storage of medications for 2 of 2 medication carts observed and 2 of 2 medication storage rooms observed. Loose pills were observed in the medication carts, refrigerator temperature logs were not filled out completely in the medication room, and supplies were expired in the medication rooms. Findings include: On [DATE] at 11:15 A.M., the following was observed on the East/West Hall: The medication cart was observed with the following loose pills in the drawers: 1 oblong white pill with marking E on one side and 01 on the other 1 round peach pill with marking 10 2 white rectangular pills marking of CTN on one side and 5 on the other 1 off white capsule no letters or numbers 1 1/2 oblong white pill with marking ZE/ 37 1 round yellow pill with marking L 1 round white white pill with marking EP 116 1 oblong green pill with marking A 16 1 round dark red pill with marking G 2 1 round white pill with marking 128 C 1 white…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 2 of 2 observations of the kitchen. Food containers were not labeled, food was open to air in the refrigerator, and a food item was observed on the freezer floor. (Kitchen) Findings include: On 1/2/24 at 9:20 A.M., the following was observed in the kitchen: Cereal on a shelf in two unlabeled containers A plastic bag of sliced cheese was observed open to air in the refrigerator A brick of margarine was observed open to air in the refrigerator A wrapped beef pot roast was observed sitting on the freezer floor An unlabeled plastic bag with six rolls was sitting on the counter The ceiling above the dishwasher was observed flaking with areas falling of The top of the dishwasher was observed with a lot of debris and dust On 1/8/24 at 9:29 A.M., the following was observed in the kitchen: Cereal on a shelf in two unlabeled containers The ceiling above the dishwasher was observed flaking with areas falling of The top of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely notification to the provider and family representative following a change in condition for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition, and 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Registered Dietician and provider were not notified following a significant change in weight, and a physician was not notified after an ordered medication was not given. (Resident 22, Resident 37) Findings include: 1. On 1/4/24 at 10:15 A.M., Resident 22's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, aortic valve stenosis, chronic venous insufficiency, edema, hypertension, anemia, and chronic heart failure. The most recent quarterly/state optional MDS Assessment, dated 12/20/23, indicated no cognitive impairment, no weight loss or swallowing concerns, a requirement of supervision with setup with transfers, and limited assistance of one with eating. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an ordered therapeutic diet was provided for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 33) Finding includes: On 1/2/24 at 12:15 P.M., Resident 33 was observed in the dining room where he was served a lunch tray of ground meat, brussel sprouts, mashed potatoes, peach cobbler, and a biscuit. The lunch tray lacked a bowl of gravy. On 1/5/24 at 12:01 P.M., Resident 33 was observed in the dining room where he was served a lunch tray of a fish patty, cole slaw, creamed corn, a slice of bread, and ice cream. The lunch tray lacked a bowl of gravy. On 1/4/24 at 10:09 A.M., Resident 33's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, dysphagia. The most recent quarterly/state optional MDS (minimum data set) Assessment, dated 10/13/23, indicated no swallowing or dental concerns, limited assistance of one staff for eating, and cognition status was unable to be assessed. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to, the following: Regular diet, mechanical soft…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident requiring respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen use. A resident did not receive oxygen as ordered. (Resident 20) Finding includes: On 1/2/24 at 11:13 A.M., Resident 20 was observed laying in bed with oxygen per nasal cannula set at 3 LPM (liters per minute). On 1/5/24 at 10:56 A.M., Resident 20 was observed laying in bed with oxygen per nasal cannula set at 3 LPM. On 1/5/24 at 3:00 P.M., Resident 20 was observed laying in bed with oxygen per nasal cannula set at 3 LPM. On 1/5/24 at 2:02 P.M., Resident 20's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure and shortness of breath. The most recent Quarterly MDS (minimum data set) Assessment, dated 12/9/23, indicated Resident 20 was cognitively intact and totally dependent on staff for transfers. Current Physician's Orders included, but not limited to, the following: Monitor oxygen saturation BID Oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's clinical record was maintained with accurate documentation for 1 of 5 records reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 37) Finding includes: On 1/5/24 at 11:03 A.M., Resident 37's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with mod behavior. The most recent Admission/State Optional MDS (minimum data set) Assessment, dated 12/7/23, indicated Resident 37's cognition was moderately impaired and she needed limited assistance of 1 staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. December 2023 Physician's Orders included, but were not limited to, the following: olanzapine (antipyschotic) 10 mg (milligrams) by mouth at bedtime, ordered 12/3/23 Rexulti (antipyschotic) 1 mg by mouth one time a day for agitation related to dementia. DC (discontinue) olanzapine when Rexulti is started, ordered 12/23/23 The December 2023 MAR (Medication Administration Record) was reviewed and indicated Resident 37 was given both olanzapine and Rexulti by 3 different licensed staff on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-08 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the written contract with the Hospice provider, failed to ensure a communication process, including how the communication will be documented between the LTC facility and the hospice provider, to ensure that the needs of the resident were addressed and met 24 hours per day for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for hospice care. The clinical record lacked documentation of ongoing communication between facility staff and hospice staff. (Resident 14) Finding includes: On 1/3/24 at 11:03 A.M., Resident 14 was observed sitting in her recliner wearing oxygen per nasal cannula at 3 LPM (liters per minute). On 1/5/24 at 10:04 A.M., Resident 14's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The most current Quarterly/State Optional MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 12/11/23, indicated Resident 14 was cognitively intact, on hospice, and required supervision with set up for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,021 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,021 — penalty dated 2024-08-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PULASKI MEMORIAL HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2022
WALKER, NATALIEIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2022
JAROSINSKI, STEPHENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2022
MALOTT, GREGGIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2022

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-6.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$474K
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 51%Medicare 21%Other / private 28%

This home reported $474K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$372per resident / day
operating cost
$11,305per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$350per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155374. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next