Sycamore Care Strategies

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 56 beds and averages 34.5 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.76 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.54 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.83 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent a resident who was at risk for elopement from leaving the facility property for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident C)This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on April 11, 2026, when the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent Resident C from exiting the facility property at approximately 2:30 P.M. during an outdoor activity. Resident C was left on the front porch without staff supervision for approximately five minutes and located approximately 0.8 miles from the facility by a community bystander. The Facility Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 4/15/26 at 2:55 P.M. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 4/16/26 at 12:45 P.M., but noncompliance remained at the lower scope and severity level of isolated, no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not Immediate Jeopardy.Finding includes:On 4/15/26 at 10:30 A.M., an Indiana Department of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and a secured environment was in place to prevent a resident with dementia from exiting the facility and leaving the property. On 4/10/24, after being last seen by facility staff around 8:00 P.M., a resident exited the facility and was not realized to be missing until 8:45 P.M. when the resident was noticed to not be in her room. The resident was located by local law enforcement at 9:11 P.M. approximately 2.4 miles away at a residential residence along US Highway 50. (Resident C) This Immediate Jeopardy began on 4/10/24 when the facility failed to ensure Resident C did not exit the facility through a window in the front of the building, located in the dining room, and walked approximately 2.4 miles to a residential residence. Local law enforcement located the resident. The resident was treated at a local hospital for a facial laceration and minor head injury from multiple falls in a ditch before returning to the facility. The facility administrator was notified of the Immediate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment in 1 of 3 resident bathrooms and 1 of 1 shared shower rooms. A shared restroom had a musty odor, discolored tile, damaged areas on the walls, dust buildup on an overhead heater, debris buildup behind a commode, and an exposed area with a sticky trap, dead insects, and droppings. A shared resident restroom contained two uncovered urine sample hats, two packages of briefs, and a pack of wipes on the floor next to the commode. (West Hall shower room, room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER])Findings include:1. During an observation on 12/3/25 at 3:10 P.M., the [NAME] Hall shared shower room contained a musty odor, overhead ceiling vents were surrounded by small dark circular areas that appeared to be mold, the wall between the door and commode and the wall across from the door had areas of missing paint, a shut off valve cover had been knocked away from the base of a wall and exposed a sticky…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity for 1 of 2 days during dining observations. Staff was feeding a resident but not engaged with the resident, a resident asked for water and staff did not get it for her, a resident was told she would get coffee and did not receive it, and food was not served in a timely manner. (Main dining room, East Hall tray pass, [NAME] Hall tray pass) Findings include: 1. During a random continuous observation on 3/12/25 at 12:34 P.M., a resident seated in the main dining room asked a staff member for water to drink and indicated they had been there for a long time waiting for their trays. The staff member indicated she would get the resident water, used hand sanitizer, and then left the dining room. The resident did not get water until she was given her tray at 12:46 P.M. 2. During a continuous observation of Resident 29 in the Main dining room on 3/12/25 the following was observed: At 12:46 P.M., Resident 29 was served her meal. At 12:54 P.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 26…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-19 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for physical restraints and 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Side (bed) rails used for mobility were marked as physical restraints, residents were marked as taking a hypnotic and an opioid but one was not administered. (Resident 7, Resident 23, Resident 25, Resident 28, Resident 30) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 3/12/25 at 10:26 A.M., Resident 7's bed was observed with half size side rails. On 3/13/25 at 2:10 P.M., Resident 7's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but was not limited to, dementia without behaviors. The most recent MDS assessment, dated 12/6/24, indicated Resident 7's cognition was severely impaired, she was independent for bed mobility, supervision for transfers, and used side rails daily as a physical restraint. Current Physician's Orders included, but were not limited to, the following: Half size side rails, ordered 9/4/24 The most recent Side Rail…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a resident specific comprehensive care plan for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls, 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition. Resident's call light and reaching device were not within the resident's reach, a resident taking an antipyschotic did not have a care plan, and a resident that was an assist to feed was not assisted by staff. (Resident 9, Resident 30, Resident 1) Findings include: 1. On 3/12/25 at 10:34 A.M., Resident 9 was sitting in his wheelchair in his room. His reaching device and call light were on the bed behind him out of the resident's reach. On 3/13/25 at 10:01 A.M., staff left the resident's room. The reaching device was on the bed closest to the window and the call light was on the bed behind him out of the resident's reach. On 3/17/25 at 12:50 P.M., Resident 9's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, impaired mobility, weakness,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 2 residents observed for incontinence care, 1 of 1 reviewed for wound care, 2 of 2 residents getting vital signs during medication administration, and 1 random observation of 2 residents. Staff did not change gloves or sanitize her hands between soiled to clean tasks. Staff performed handwashing for less then 20 seconds before and after wound care. A blood pressure cuff and pulse oximeter were not disinfected between residents. Proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was not worn when transferring a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). (Resident 2, Resident 22, Resident 26, Resident 29, Resident 1, Resident 25, Resident 30) Findings include: 1. On 3/14/25 at 8:17 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 4 was observed getting vital signs on Resident 2 with the [NAME] Hall wrist blood pressure cuff and pulse oximeter during the medication pass. LPN 4 indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment for residents for 1 of 1 shower rooms, 3 of 16 resident rooms/bathrooms observed for environment, and 3 random observations. The shower room grout was soiled and water was leaking from the hand held shower head, resident wheelchairs and a Broda chair had leather flaking off the arm rests, an entrance door to room had cracked, sharp plastic on the bottom, carpeting was loose causing an uneven floor surface, and a resident's recliner had a strong odor of urine. (Shower Room, room [ROOM NUMBER]A, Resident 29, room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident 7, Resident 8) Findings include: 1. On 3/14/25 at 9:17 A.M., the following was observed in the Shower Room: a missing tile at the entrance of the shower, grout was soiled on the floor and wall of shower, white build up on the floor and the hand rails in the shower, water dripping from the hand held shower head, the toilet paper holder was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to clarify a code status for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for advance directives. A resident's current physician's order did not match the signed Indiana Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment form. (Resident 29) Finding includes: On [DATE] at 2:13 P.M., Resident 29's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behaviors and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The most recent Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 29's cognition was severely impaired. Current Physician's Orders included, but were not limited to, the following: cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR or full code indicated a patient's consent to receive all possible life-saving measures in the event of a cardiac or respiratory arrest), ordered [DATE] A current Code Status Care Plan, created and last reviewed on [DATE], indicated Resident 29 had a code status of Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNR) with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate notice of charges for services covered and services not covered under Medicare for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. Resident's and/or their representative did not receive an Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) when their Medicare Part A services terminated and they remained in the facility. (Resident 5, Resident 14) Findings include: 1. On 3/14/25 at 3:30 P.M., the Administrator provided a list of residents who were discharged from a Medicare covered Part A stay with benefit days remaining in the past 6 months. On 3/17/25 at 6:52 A.M., beneficiary notices given to Resident 5 were reviewed. Resident 5's discharge date from Medicare Part A benefits was 1/17/25. The resident remained in the facility. An ABN notice for future services was not provided. 2. On 3/14/25 at 3:30 P.M., the Administrator provided a list of residents who were discharged from a Medicare covered Part A stay with benefit days remaining in the past 6 months. On 3/17/25 at 6:52 A.M., beneficiary notices given to Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was diagnosed with dementia, received the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for dementia care. A high risk to fall resident repeatedly trying to get out of her chair was not offered an activity or change in environment. (Resident 1) Finding includes: On 3/13/25 at 2:52 P.M., Resident 1 was observed in a recliner next to the wall by the nurse's station, trying to get out of the recliner and the chair alarm going off. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 32 told Resident 1 not to get up. On 3/13/25 at 2:58 P.M., Resident 1's chair alarm was going off. LPN 32 told Resident 1 to sit back down. Resident 1 was getting agitated and starting to raise her voice. On 3/13/25 at 3:01 P.M., Resident 1's chair alarm was going off. LPN 32 told Resident 1 to sit back in her chair and asked Resident 1 where she was going. Resident 1 was getting upset. LPN 32 asked Resident 1 if she wanted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 4 of 12 residents reviewed in the sample. Care plans were not developed for a resident doing household chores and residents with weight loss/nutrition, dementia, and behaviors. (Resident 24, Resident 1, Resident 4, Resident 26) Findings include: 1. On 2/19/24 at 9:45 A.M., Resident 24 was observed sweeping the facility floor outside of the activity room. On 2/20/24 at 2:24 P.M., Resident 24's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behavioral disturbance and anxiety. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 12/7/23, indicated Resident 24's cognition was severely impaired and she was a limited assist of 1 staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Resident 24's clinical record lacked an order to do household chores. Resident 24's clinical record lacked assessments to do household chores.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$45,306 in federal fines across 5 penalties.

• $14,385 — penalty dated 2026-04-16
• $8,154 — penalty dated 2024-04-12
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
• $13,635 — penalty dated 2023-10-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $348K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN