No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Mulberry Health & Rehabilitation Center

502 W Jackson St, Mulberry, IN 46058 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 159 certified beds · (765) 296-2911 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (765) 296-2911 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 10 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • about 31% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
366 W Main St · (765) 379-2401 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
106 E Jackson St · (765) 296-4667 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Park Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.8%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.8%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.9%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.0%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.7%23.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.5%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.7%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control32.0%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.8%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.2%79.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.0%22.2%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.8%10.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.001.611.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.451.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 88 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
43.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 43.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.6%CMS range 42.4–60.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.3%CMS range 5.5–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge43.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 3.7–13.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.671.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.60
RN hours/ resident / day
0.85
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.02
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.47
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.50
RN hoursweekends
33.1%
Total nursing turnover
18.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 159 beds and averages 131.4 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-24)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-08)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

10 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) was completed when residents received new mental health diagnoses and were prescribed medications for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for PASARR (Resident 100 and 62). Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 100 was reviewed on 6/20/25 at 2:41 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, hypertension, anxiety disorder, and osteoporosis. A physician's order, dated 9/5/24, indicated to give Buspirone HCL (an anti-anxiety medication) three times a day for anxiety disorder. A PASARR level 1 was not repeated to reflect the new mental health medications ordered on 9/5/24, until 4/7/25. During an interview, on 6/20/25 at 3:05 p.m., the Executive Director (ED) indicated they did not complete a new PASARR for the Buspirone when the medication was added. 2. The clinical record for Resident 62 was reviewed on 6/20/25 at 9:35 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia-unspecified severity, major depressive disorder, anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to keep medication carts free of expired medications and to dispose of a controlled medication with compromised packaging in 2 of 4 medication carts (300 unit and 100 unit) and to properly store drug busters and chemical solutions in 2 of 2 medication storage rooms (300 unit and 200 unit) reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: 1. The 300-unit medication cart 1 was reviewed on 6/23/25 at 9:39 a.m. In the second drawer of the medication cart, the following were observed: a. Docusate Sodium (a laxative medication) 100 mg (milligram) oral tablets for Resident 75 were found with an expiration date of 5/31/25. b. Ondansetron (a nausea medication) 4 mg tablets for Resident 75 were found with an expiration date of 5/31/25. During an interview, on 6/23/25 at 9:55 a.m., RN 2 indicated the pharmacy audited the medication carts once a month and pulled expired medications from the cart. The nurses would also audit the carts for loose pills and narcotic book review. 2. The 100-unit medication cart 2 was reviewed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was dressed in her own clothing and to ensure staff was not standing while feeding a resident for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dignity. (Resident 50) Finding includes: During an observation, on 5/1/24 at 12:52 p.m., CNA 6 was standing on the left side of Resident 50's wheelchair feeding the resident. During an observation, on 5/1/24 at 12:59 p.m., CNA 6 took a chair from another table and sat down to continue feeding the resident. During an observation, on 5/3/24 at 9:30 a.m., the resident was sitting at a table in the dining room facing the door. There was a resident sitting across the table from the resident and five other residents were in the dining room. The resident was wearing a long-sleeved shirt with the top of the shirt pulled down exposing a large portion of the resident's chest. The shoulder seams were touching her elbows. CNA 5 pulled the front of the shirt up to cover her chest. CNA 5 checked the tag on the back of the shirt and indicated the shirt belonged to the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an accurate level 1 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR. (Resident 105) Finding includes: The clinical record for Resident 105 was reviewed on 5/2/24 at 4:30 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, major depressive disorder, dissociative identity disorder, and anxiety disorder. A physician's order, with a start date of 1/25/24, indicated the resident received alprazolam (an antianxiety medication) 0.5 milligrams twice a day. A notice of PASARR level 1 screen outcome indicated the resident did not have any mental health diagnoses known or suspected. The PASARR did not include the residents major depressive disorder diagnosis, dissociative identity disorder diagnosis, or the resident's alprazolam medication. During an interview, on 5/6/24 at 3:10 p.m., the Social Services Director indicated the diagnoses and medication should have been listed on the PASARR. The person who submitted the PASARR may not have had all the information. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure over the counter medications were labeled and beverages were not stored in the medication refrigerator for 3 of 3 medication carts and 1 of 1 medication room observed for medication storage. (cart 1 and 2 on the 100 hall, cart 1 on the 200 hall, and the medication room on 200 hall) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 5/2/24 at 9:55 a.m., with LPN 2, the medication cart 2 on the 100 hall was observed to have the following: a. one bottle of chest congestion relief (guaifenesin) for Resident 69, with no pharmacy label. b. one bottle of aspirin 81 mg which contained 500 tablets had Resident 69's first initial and last name in black marker on the top of the bottle, with no pharmacy label. c. one bottle of melatonin 5 mg which contained 240 tablets with Resident 69's name written on the top, with no pharmacy label. d. one bottle of B12 1000 mcg had black ink and indicated morning, there was no resident name or pharmacy label. The clinical record for Resident 69 was reviewed on 5/2/24 at 11:26 a.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-02-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label, date and store food in a sanitary manner. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: During an observation, on 02/13/23 at 9:55 a.m., the kitchen cooler was noted with Dietary Manager (DM) and the following was observed: a. on the cooler shelf was a name brand open can of coffee like drink with no open date on the can. b. on the cooler shelf was a plastic bottle of name brand soda pop with no label or date on the bottle. c. on the cooler shelf was a large plastic cup from a gas station with an uncovered straw in the cup with no label or date on the cup. d. on the cooler shelf was a soft sided plastic lunch box with no label or date on the lunch box. During an interview, on 02/13/23 at 9:55 a.m., the DM indicated I don't know if the open and undated drinks and lunch container could be kept in the walk-in cooler. During an interview, on 02/16/23 at 2:28 p.m., the Registered Dietician (RD) indicated we (facility) do not have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code a resident's discharge status in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for MDS assessments. (Resident 129) Finding includes: The record for Resident 129 was reviewed on 2/15/23 at 2:56 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fracture of left pubis, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, pulmonary fibrosis, chronic kidney disease, and hypertension. A discharge MDS assessment, dated 1/13/23, indicated the resident was discharged to an acute hospital on 1/1/23. During an interview, on 2/15/23 at 10:07 a.m., the Director of Nursing indicated Resident 129 was discharged home with daughter and not to the hospital. The discharge MDS assessment, completed on 1/13/23, was coded wrong. During an interview, on 2/17/23 at 11:00 a.m., the MDS Coordinator indicated the MDS assessment was coded wrong and should have been coded as discharged to the community. The facility followed the RAI manual. 3.1-31(i)

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document targeted behaviors in the comprehensive care plan for a resident receiving an antipsychotic medication for delusional behaviors for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. (Resident 101) Finding includes: The record for Resident 101 was reviewed on 2/14/22 at 2:49 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, right femur fracture, vascular dementia, restlessness and agitation, Alzheimer's disease, delusional disorder, depression, and mood disorder. A history and physical, dated 6/15/22, indicated Resident 101 had a diagnosis of dementia and no diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. A physician's order, dated 8/31/22, indicated to add a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder due to hallucinations and delusions. A history and physical, dated 12/16/22, indicated Resident 101 had a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder and the diagnosis was very unclear and there was no prior documentation to support. She had no documentation for schizoaffective disorder or no use of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assesses and document bruising on the skin for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for skin issues and skin assessments. (Resident 2 and 20) Findings include: 1. During an observation of Resident 2, on 02/13/23 at 12:39 p.m., the resident was found to have a red bruise on her left arm at the wrist area. During an observation of Resident 2, on 02/14/23 at 2:02 p.m., the resident was found to have a red bruise on her left arm at the wrist area. During an observation of Resident 2, on 02/15/23 at 1:10 p.m., the resident was found to have a red discoloration/bruise on her left forearm at the wrist area. The record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 02/13/23 at 2:48 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anemia, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and thrombocytopenia (a low platelet count and platelets stop bleeding by clumping and forming plugs in blood vessel injuries). A physician's order, initiated on 11/24/22, indicated to give aspirin (a medication which was used to prevent platelets from sticking together…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to date multi-dose bottles of medication when they were opened in 1 of 4 medication storage refrigerators reviewed for medication storage. (300 Unit) Finding includes: During a medication storage observation in the 300 Unit medication refrigerator, on 02/14/23 at 9:45 a.m., with LPN 8, two (2) bottles of Ativan concentrate were found open without a date to indicated when the multi-dose bottles had been opened. During an interview, on 02/14/23 at 9:47 a.m., LPN 8 indicated the bottles should have been labeled with the date they had been opened. A facility policy, titled Medication Storage and Labeling, dated January 2023 and provided by the Director of Nursing on 02/15/23 at 11:30 a.m., indicated .multi-dose vials which have been opened .should be dated 3.1-25(j)

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HENRY COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2013
MUTZ, JOHNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
DYNES, SHELDONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
PIDGEON, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
SHORE, MARIONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
WARE, DEBORAHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 08/07/2021
RING, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2022
MHRC, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2013
MULBERRY HEALTH & RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2013
DODT, KEVENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
THOMAS, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
WALLAR, HEIDIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$4.9M
Related-party expense31% of expenses

This home reported $4.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 31% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$349per resident / day
operating cost
$10,611per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$348per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155600. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next