Brookside Care Strategies
505 N Gavin St, Muncie, IN 47303 · For profit - Corporation · 42 certified beds · (765) 289-1915 Medicaid only — no Medicare
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0570)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-04, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
CMS has published no overall rating for this home since 2026-04 — most often because it is a Special Focus Facility, whose rating CMS withholds. The line above is where the record stops; we do not carry the last star forward, and it is not this home’s rating today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.4% | 11.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.4% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.6% | 0.4% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.4% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 16.9% | 25.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.5% | 3.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 25.9% | 11.9% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 31.2% | 23.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 86.1% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.6% | 3.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.5% | 23.3% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 55.7% | 13.6% | 17.1% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.17 | 1.61 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.92 | 1.44 | 1.80 | better |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 42 beds and averages 38.7 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.69 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.61 on weekdays — about the same on weekends as weekdays. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-23 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to honor a resident's right to return to the facility from an emergency room visit following a resident-to-resident altercation (Resident C). The facility failed to demonstrate inability to meet the resident's needs or that the resident was an immediate danger to others with interventions attempted. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 8/16/24 when the facility discharged the resident with his belongings to a hotel located 26 miles away from the facility, with a two-day paid stay. This deficient practice put the resident at risk for harm related to lack of a safe environment, placing the resident at risk of serious accidents. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 8/22/24, when the facility provided education to managers and nurses regarding transfer and discharge rights, but noncompliance remained at the lower scope and severity of harm that is not Immediate Jeopardy because the resident was found on a sidewalk by police back in the same city the facility is located in and was hospitalized for dehydration and acute kidney injury .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-23 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure facility policies were implemented to allow a resident to return to the facility for care following an emergency room visit. The resident was not provided adequate notice to appeal the discharge prior to being transported to and left at a hotel 26 miles away from the facility. The Immediate Jeopardy that began on 8/16/24, when the facility failed to allow a resident to return to the facility after a hospital visit per facility policy. This deficient practice put the resident at risk for harm related to lack of a safe environment, placing the resident at risk of serious accidents. The Administrator, Social Services Director (SSD), and the Housekeeping Supervisor were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 8/20/24 at 4:37 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed when the facility completed education of management and nurses regarding discharge rights and the facility policy for resident discharge on [DATE], but noncompliance remained at the lower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from verbal abuse and neglect from staff when a CNA refused to answer a resident's call light, refused to provide personal hygiene assistance, and told the resident to not use his call light for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident 10). This deficient practice resulted in the resident being afraid of the CNA (CNA 9), being left in soiled bedding, and being tearful and crying.Finding includes:During an interview, on 5/17/26 at 1:04 p.m., Resident 10 indicated he had filed a complaint about CNA 9 and did not know what was going on with the complaint. He was very upset and speaking with his voice high. He had reported to the facility that he had his call light on, and CNA 9 came into his room and told him he was on his call light too much. She yelled at him. She left him in a urine-soaked bed all night. He had not received care until the next shift. This was not the first time this had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a cognitively impaired resident who wandered (Resident D) was free from resident-to-resident physical abuse perpetrated by a resident known to be physically abusive towards others when approached (Resident C) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice resulted in Resident D sustaining a head laceration and required emergent treatment at the hospital with six sutures to repair. Findings include: Review of an Incident Report sent to the Indiana Department of Health's reporting system indicated, on 8/15/24 at 9:01 p.m., Resident D was found lying on the floor in Resident C's room. Resident D had a laceration on the left side of his head and bruising to his chest and head. Resident C indicated there had been an altercation. A local police department's case report, dated 8/15/24 and provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 8/21/24 at 10:25 a.m., indicated as the officer got to the door of Resident C's room, blood was observed on the floor inside the entryway. Resident C was asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-08-30 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized behavior plan that maximized the resident's dignity for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident B) when the SSD indicated to Resident B he would be able to be discharged to a group home if he had good behavior for 14 days. This practice resulted in his fixation on the date he was to be discharged to go to a group home and contributed to his increased frustration and behaviors of self harm, yelling at staff, throwing items, and banging his head, which lead to an inpatient stay at a psychiatric hospital. Findings include: Review of video footage with audio, on 8/29/23 at 11:00 a.m., indicated on 8/19/23 Resident B was being escorted in his wheelchair to his room from the nurses station area. CNA 12 pushed his wheelchair while CNA 23 walked backwards holding his legs from touching the ground. LPN 8 held a gown on the right side of him to shield the other staff member from him spitting on them. As they entered his room, a staff member called Resident B a nasty a--. Resident B's clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from resident to resident physical abuse for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for abuse (Residents P and N). Resident P experienced being bitten by Resident N. He was sent to the hospital and required antibiotics to treat the resulting wound. B. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by a staff member for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident J). Findings include: A. During an interview with Resident P, on 8/9/23 at 12:36 p.m., he indicated he was bitten on his wrist by Resident N about two weeks ago. It was the second time he had been bitten while at the facility, but not by the same person. Resident N was pi--ing him off and everyone around him was telling Resident N to shut up so he put his hand over his mouth and he bit him. He bled like a stuck pig. The area hurt after he was bitten but it didn't…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse and neglect to the Administrator immediately to allow for implementation of the facility's abuse prohibition policy, and also resulting in a delay of reporting to the Indiana Department of Health immediately or no later than two hours of the abuse allegation for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident 10). Findings include:During an interview, on 5/17/26 at 1:04 p.m., Resident 10 indicated he had filed a complaint about CNA 9 and did not know what was going on with the complaint. He was very upset and speaking with his voice high. He had reported to the facility that he had his call light on, and CNA 9 came into his room and told him he was on his call light too much. She yelled at him. She left him in a urine-soaked bed all night. He had not received care until the next shift. This was not the first time this had happened. He had told another CNA, who then completed the paperwork for him to file a grievance.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy to immediately begin an investigation of an allegation of staff to resident verbal abuse and neglect, including taking action to protect residents and implementing preventative measures pending investigation for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident 10). Findings include:During an interview, on 5/17/26 at 1:04 p.m., Resident 10 indicated he had filed a complaint about CNA 9 and did not know what was going on with the complaint. He was very upset and speaking with his voice high. He had reported to the facility that he had his call light on, and CNA 9 came into his room and told him he was on his call light too much. She yelled at him. She left him in a urine-soaked bed all night. He had not received care until the next shift. This was not the first time this had happened. He had told another CNA, who then completed the paperwork for him to file a grievance. He indicated he was still very upset and wanted to be assured…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives were informed of and given notice of transfer/discharge and bed hold documents for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Residents 26 and 42) Findings include: 1.Resident 42's record was reviewed on 3/19/26 at 9:10 a.m. Medical diagnoses included alcohol dependence, anxiety, and traumatic brain injury.A 10/7/25 social service note indicated the resident was transported to a neuropsychiatric hospital at 4:50 p.m. A notice of transfer/discharge was not signed by the resident or representative.A 2/5/26 social service note indicated the resident was transported to a neuropsychiatric hospital at 3:01 a.m. A notice of transfer/discharge was not signed by the resident or representative.A 3/5/26 nurse's note indicated resident 42 was transported to a neuropsychiatric hospital at 8:12 p.m. The record lacked a notice of transfer/discharge and bed hold policy for this date.The record lacked resident and/or representative notification regarding notice of transfer/discharge and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
A. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to utilize infection prevention and control measures regarding contact isolation during insulin administration for 1 of 10 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident 11)B. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to utilize infection prevention and control measures while handling medications with bare hands for 1 of 10 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident 36)C. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to utilize infection prevention and control measures regarding enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) during catheter care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions. (Resident 1)Findings include: A. During an observation, on 5/17/26 at 11:46 a.m., LPN 3 entered Resident 11's contact isolation room wearing only gloves and obtained the resident's blood glucose. She doffed her gloves, returned the glucometer to a barrier on the medication cart in the hallway, and performed hand hygiene. LPN 3 prepared the resident's insulin,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity when a staff member made a derogatory statement about the resident within hearing distance of the resident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B) The deficient practice was corrected on 3/20/26, prior to the start of survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Findings include:Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 3/30/26 at 1:06 p.m. Diagnoses included moderate dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere with mood disturbance and cognitive communication deficit.An 11/11/25, admission, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A progress note, dated 2/23/26 at 3:00 p.m., indicated, on 2/20/26, a staff member made an inappropriate statement to a staff member about Resident B and in front of Resident B. The resident stated he did not hear the statement made and denied any psychosocial distress. A current care plan, dated 2/23/26, indicated the resident was at risk for psychosocial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse involving a housekeeper (Housekeeper 6) kissing a resident (Resident E) and messaging the resident on a social media platform for 1 of 3 reportable events reviewed. Findings include:An anonymous report submitted to the Indiana Department of Health indicated a staff member was having an affair with a resident and facility management failed to act upon the allegation. During an interview on 2/19/26 at 3:24 p.m., the Administrator indicated while CNA 7 was assisting Resident E with a shower, Resident E told CNA 7 that she and Housekeeper 6 had kissed. CNA 7 reported the allegation to management as the Administrator was not in the building at the time. The Administrator called the Housekeeping Supervisor and told her to suspend Housekeeper 6. The Administrator handled the incident as a reportable, he suspended Housekeeper 6, investigated the allegation and interviewed other residents. Housekeeper 6 denied the allegation of kissing Resident E but admitted that he and Resident E messaged each other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from verbal abuse (Resident D) by a staff member (Activity Assistant 1) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse.Findings include:Resident D'S clinical record was reviewed on 12/18/25 at 2:19 p.m. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, chronic pneumothorax muscle wasting and atrophy, and depressive disorder.Review of the most current quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 12/2/25, indicated the resident refused care daily.A facility reported incident, dated 10/4/25, indicated Activity Assistant 1 and Resident D had a verbal altercation.Review of the facility's investigation indicated the following:Housekeeper 2's written statement, dated 10/4/25, indicated Resident D called Activity Assistant 1 a dumb a. Activity Assistant 1 responded with, You can't breathe and chooses to sit in between 2 smokers. So [sic] who's [sic] the dumba? Activity Assistant 1 continued with, I treat people the way I want to be treated. Treat me with disrespect, I treat you with disrespect.Activity Assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a cognitively impaired resident was free from staff-to-resident verbal abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B) Finding includes:Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 9/25/25 at 11:49 a.m. Diagnoses included Asperger's syndrome, unspecified altered mental status, malignant neoplasm of parotid gland, and generalized anxiety disorder. An 8/26/25, significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident B was severely cognitively impaired. Behaviors included other behavioral symptoms not directed towards others and rejection of care. The resident quired substantial staff assistance for oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, bathing, upper and lower body dressing, and footwear assistance. He required set-up assistance from staff for ambulation and transfers. Resident B's current care plans included the following:A 6/7/23 problem of impaired safety awareness related to Asperger's syndrome. Interventions included calling family as/if needed.A 9/2/25 problem of potential for psychosocial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing coverage 24-hour basis for 11 days of the second (2nd) quarter of 2025 reviewed for sufficient staffing. This deficiency had the potential to affect 39 of 39 residents residing in the facility.Finding includes: A Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing report, for the second quarter of 2025, indicated the facility failed to ensure Licensed Nursing Coverage 24/7 on the following dates: 1/6, 1/11, 1/13, 2/6, 2/7, 2/8, 2/9, 2/10, 2/17, 2/20, and 3/30.Review of the current Facility Assessment, on 8/20/25 at 9:37 a.m., updated 8/1/25, the resident acuity (the level of care and supervision) affecting licensed nurses was as follows: Respiratory treatments for 3 residents, Behavioral/Mental health for 39 residents, Medication Administration for 39 residents, Hospice Care for 1 resident, and Wound Care for 2 residents. The facility overall staffing needs indicated 2 Registered Nurses (RNs) providing direct care and 4 Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) providing direct care. The facility available staff were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-22 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse was present in the facility for 8 hours during a 24-hour period for 25 days of the 2nd Quarter of 2025 reviewed for sufficient staffing. This deficiency had the potential to affect 39 of 39 residents residing in the facility.Findings include: A Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing report, for the second quarter of 2025, indicated the facility failed to have Registered Nurse coverage for 1/3, 1/6, 1/9, 1/10, 1/11, 1/12, 1/17, 1/20, 1/23, 1/24, 1/25, 1/26, 1/27, 1/31, 2/3, 2/6, 2/7, 2/8, 2/9, 3/8, 3/9, 3/23, 3/29, and 3/30. During an interview, on 8/21/25 at 10:00 a.m., the Administrator indicated he was aware the facility had issues with staffing RNs in January, February, and March of 2025. He ran the clock-in/clock-out reports every Monday and sent them to the corporate office where they were reviewed and sent in to report the RN hours. He indicated the situation was resolved as the facility now had multiple RNs on staff to ensure the 8 hours of RN coverage. QMA 9 was responsible for scheduling in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-22 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents, for whom the facility managed funds, or their representatives, received quarterly funds statements for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for quarterly statements. (Residents F and H)Findings include:A current 8/19/25, facility Trail Balance resident funds statement indicated the facility managed personal funds for 32 residents. Residents E, F and H names were listed on the account list.Quarterly statements were requested of facility management for review for Residents E, F, and H. Residents F and H did not have quarterly statements for review. During an interview on 8/20/25 at 1:36 p.m., the Administrator and Business Office Manager both indicated that quarterly statements had not been given to residents who did not have a responsible party to receive them. This had been an error and residents should have received the statements themselves.A current, 2017, facility policy titled, Deposit of Resident Funds, provided by the Business Office Manager on 8/20/21 at 1:38 p.m., indicated The resident is provided a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-22 · tag F0570 — patternAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a surety bond in sufficient amount to safeguard all resident funds. This deficient practice had the potential to impact 32 of 32 residents for whom the facility managed funds. Findings include: Review of a current 8/19/25, facility Trail Balance resident funds statement indicated the facility managed resident funds for 32 residents.Review of the facility's current, April 1, 2022, surety bond agreement indicated the resident funds were covered in liability surety for the amount of $30,000.00 (thirty thousand dollars).A review of bank statements for July 2025 (7/1/25 to 7/31/25), June 2025 (5/31/25 to 6/30/25) and May 2025 (5/1/25 to 5/30/25) indicated 23 days had a daily ledger balance greater than $30,000.00 as follows: 7/3/25 $41,381.03, 7/7/25 $41,422.03, 7/9/25 $43,429.03, 7/13/25 $42,740.03, 7/16/25 $43,099.03, 7/21/25 $31,950.82, 7/22/25 $32,192.32, 7/23/25 $31,869.32, 7/25/25 $31,773.27, 7/28/25 $30,109.89, 6/3/25 $42,544.15, 6/4/25 $48,374.65, 6/5/25 $39,050.65, 6/6/25 $37,644.65, 6/9/25 $38,670.65, 6/11/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's representative regarding change in condition for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for change in condition. (Resident C)Finding includes: Resident C's record was reviewed on 8/19/25 at 12:31 p.m. Medical diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, hypertension, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (acid reflux).A 5/27/25, quarterly, quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated the resident was mildly cognitively impaired.A nurse's note, dated 7/22/25 at 12:39 p.m. indicated the resident was found cool, clammy, tachycardic (high heart rate), and hypertensive (high blood pressure). The resident was encouraged to take her blood pressure medication and drink fluids, but verbally refused and swatted at a cup containing the medication. The note lacked notification of family or the resident representative.A progress note dated 7/22/25 at 2:57 p.m. indicated the resident was excessively sweating, tachycardic, hypertensive, and tachypneic (high respiratory rate) and continued to refuse medications and fluids. The nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for oxygen services for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for oxygen use. (Resident 5)Finding includes:During an interview with Resident 5 on 8/19/25 at 10:05 a.m., he indicated he used oxygen at 3 liters per minute (lpm) via nasal cannula all the time, except when smoking. During the interview, the resident's oxygen concentrator was observed to be on 4 lpm of oxygen. The resident indicated he had not adjusted the flow rate. During an interview with Resident 5 on 8/20/25 at 8:42 a.m., he indicated his oxygen flow had not been adjusted. The oxygen concentrator remained on 4 lpm.Resident 5's record was reviewed on 8/20/25 at 10:35 a.m. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure, atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm), and generalized anxiety disorder.Current physician orders included change nebulizer tubing weekly on Sunday night shift every Sunday, nebulizer machine for as needed (PRN) albuterol (respiratory medication) nebulization (changing a liquid medication into a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate daily nurse staffing information was posted and readily available for residents and resident representatives. This deficiency had the potential to affect 39 of 39 residents residing in the facility. Finding includes:During an observation, on 8/18/25 at 7:34 a.m., the 'Daily Staffing Posting without Units' information sheet was dated Thursday, 8/14/25. This was posted on the wall behind the nurse's station. On 8/18/25 at 9:30 a.m., the Daily Staffing Posting without Units was dated Monday, 8/18/25 and indicated there were no Registered Nurses (RN) or Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) scheduled for the evening and night shifts, and there were no Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) scheduled for the night shift. On 8/20/25 at 9:32 a.m., the 'Daily Staffing Posting without Units' indicated there were no RNs or LPNs on the evening shift. During an interview, on 8/21/25 at 1:45 p.m., QMA 9 indicated she was responsible for updating the nurse staffing post everyday. She arrived at work between 8:30 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide social services regarding financial management regarding the management of cash savings and spending down of resources to remain eligible for Medicaid for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for assistance to manage finances. ( Resident C and D)Findings include:1.During an interview, Resident C's representative indicated the resident's funds had not been managed correctly. The resident had cash funds stored in the Social Service office, not the business office. There was no method to account for what funds had been spent. At the time of discharge, the representative was given cash in the amount of $700 dollars, and the family thought their loved one should have more money. The facility staff informed them the resident purchased lots of snacks, when they questioned the amount of money returned to them.During an interview on 8/21/25 at 1:00 p.m., the Administrator indicated he had not known Resident C had cash in the Social Service office until he witnessed it being given to the family at the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement approaches to maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to prevent repeat deficiencies. Findings include:Review of the Summary Statement of Deficiencies, for the facility's last annual Recertification and State Licensure Survey completed on 9/26/24, indicated the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information readily available in a readable format to residents and visitors daily. The plan of correction indicated, A new updated form was completed and placed in accessible area to resident and visitors, all staff that complete the daily nurse staffing information forms have been provided a revised form and provided education on the completion and accessibility to resident and visitors. Each morning, upon arrival to the facility the Administrator and/or Designee will ensure the current day's nurse staffing information was completed. Repeat concerns regarding complete and accurate daily nurse staffing posting were cited during the August 18, 2025, survey as follows:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide education for and to offer administration of influenza and/or pneumococcal vaccinations to residents for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for vaccinations. (Residents K, 5, and 7)Finding includes: 1.Resident 7's clinical record was reviewed on 8/19/25 at 1:25 p.m. Diagnoses included heart failure, asthma, and anxiety disorder. An 8/7/25, quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The record lacked influenza and pneumococcal vaccine education or administration records. During an interview with the DON on 8/22/25 at 11:34 a.m., she indicated she was unable to locate information regarding resident 7's influenza or pneumococcal vaccination status. 2.Resident 5's record was reviewed on 8/20/25 at 10:35 a.m. Medical diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure, hypertension, and anxiety disorder. A 7/17/25, quarterly, MDS assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The clinical record indicated the resident received an unspecified pneumococcal vaccine in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to educate on offer the COVID-19 vaccination to employees for 1 of 1 employees reviewed for COVID-19 vaccination. (CNA 8)Finding includes:During an interview with CNA 8 on 8/22/25 at 8:45 a.m., she indicated she had worked at the facility for approximately two years. During her time at the facility, she had not been educated on or offered the COVID-19 vaccination.During an interview with the IP on 8/22/25 at 8:57 a.m., she indicated the facility had no documentation of vaccination education or offerings from 2024.A current facility policy titled, COVID-19 Vaccination Policy provided by the DON on 8/22/25 at 11:05 a.m. indicated the following, .7 The infection prevention and control measures that are implemented to address the SARS-CoV-2 are incorporated into the facility infection prevention and control plan. These measures include: a. encouraging staff, residents and visitors to remain up-to-date with all COVID-19 vaccine doses; b. providing resources and counseling about the importance of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the multi-use blood glucose monitoring device was sanitized per manufacturer's guidelines during a random observation of blood glucose testing. Findings include: During an observation of blood glucose testing on 2/20/25 beginning at 11:34 a.m., QMA 2 removed a blood glucose testing meter from the top drawer of the medication cart. She wiped the device with an alcohol swab. At 11:35 a.m., she entered Resident G's room and placed the cup with the device on the overbed table. She donned gloves, swabbed the resident's finger with an alcohol wipe, and obtained the sample and reading. At 11:39 a.m., she removed her gloves and wiped the device with an alcohol swab and performed hand hygiene. At 11:40 a.m., she entered Resident H's room and placed the cup with the device on the overbed table. She donned gloves and swabbed Resident H's finger and obtained the sample and reading. At 11:42 a.m., she removed her gloves and wiped the device with an alcohol swab and returned to the medication cart, placing the device…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure insulin administration for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for insulin administration. (Resident B and C) Findings include: 1. Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 2/19/25 at 11:50 a.m. Diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), unspecified altered mental status, unspecified poly neuropathy, and long term use of insulin. A physician's order, dated 1/3/25, indicated Lantus (a diabetic medication to treat to DM), administer 30 units subcutaneously in the morning. The electronic medication administration record (eMAR) indicated the medication had not been administered. The progress notes lacked documentation regarding the missed dose. A physician's order, dated 9/10/24, indicated Lispro (a diabetic medication to treat to DM), administer 10 units subcutaneously before meals. The eMAR indicated the medication had not been administered on 1/2/25 for the 4:00 p.m. dose. An administration note indicated the resident only took 4 units and lacked indication of physician notification regarding decreased administered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed implement their abuse prohibition policy to ensure the safety of residents when an employee accused of abuse was permitted to remain in the facility during the investigation into the allegation. (Resident B and Care Specialist (CS) 1) Findings include: Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 1/8/25 at 11:09 a.m Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic pain syndrome, hypertension, convulsions, psychoactive substance abuse and anxiety. Review of the most current significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/12/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. During an interview on 1/8/25 at 12:18 p.m., CS 1 indicated she was informed that Resident B had alleged she kicked the resident's foot. She was unaware of any physical contact with the resident. CS 1 indicated she was not suspended pending investigation, but instructed to stay away from Resident B. During an interview on 1/8/25 at 1:10 p.m., the Administrator indicated Resident B told him CS 1 had kicked the resident's foot…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure refrigerators functioned at a level to maintain safe food temperatures. This deficient practice had the potential to impact 34 of 34 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour on 9/22/24 at 9:50 a.m., the following concerns regarding food refrigeration were noted: The standard white, two-section, (freezer on top) refrigerator registered a temperature of 48 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Inside the refrigerator were multiple trays of pre-poured drinks (milk and juices) and blocks of sliced cheeses. During an interview at this time, [NAME] 13 indicated the refrigerator should register between 36 to 38 degrees F. He believed the door may have been left open too long during breakfast meal service. He would let the Dietary Manager know and keep and eye on the temperatures. Review of the Refrigerator Temperature Logs for September 2024 indicated the logs for the three refrigerator and/or freezer units in the facility kitchen had not been completed in multiple days. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-26 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement approaches to maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to prevent repeat deficiencies. The deficient practice the the potential to impact 34 of 34 residents. Findings include: Review of the Summary Statement of Deficiencies, for the facility's last annual recertification and licensure survey completed on 11/17/23, indicated the facility had deficiencies related to a lack of properly labeled medications and completed shift-to-shift narcotic reconciliation sheets. The plan of correction indicated, Ongoing corrective action will be monitored through the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program to ensure ongoing compliance. During an interview on 9/26/24 at 4:53 p.m., the Administrator indicated he was unable to provide the facility's most recent QAPI plan because they did not have one. The facility needed a more formal process for QAPI, where minutes were part of the meetings. He did not have any record keeping of the minutes for the meetings that were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespreadMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a fully functional call light system for all resident rooms and resident bathrooms. This deficient practice impacted 34 of 34 residents who resided in the facility. Findings Include: During random observations of the facility the following resident rooms were noted to have a hand bell or table top bells placed on tables, chest of drawers, and/or refrigerator tops: a. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on 9/22/24 at 9:56 a.m. b. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on 9/22/24 at 10:59 a.m. c. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on 9/22/24 at 11:46 a.m. d. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on 9/23/24 at 10:00 a.m. e. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on 9/23/24 at 10:18 a.m. f. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on 9/23/24 at 2:54 p.m. g. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on 9/23/24 at 2:55 p.m. h. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on 9/23/24 at 2:57 p.m. Confidential interviews were conducted during the course of the survey. During a confidential interview, a resident indicated the call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the most recent survey results were readily accessible to residents and resident representatives. Findings include: A review of the facility survey binder on 9/22/24 at 10:04 a.m., located behind the nurse's station, indicated the most recent survey included in the survey binder was dated 11/27/23. The additional surveys included in the survey binder were all dated prior to 11/27/23. Signage at the nurse's station indicated to ask for the survey binder. During an interview, on 9/23/24 at 10:11 a.m., the Administrator indicated the survey dated 11/27/23 was the previous annual survey and the survey binder only needed to include annual surveys. He was not aware complaint surveys were required to be included in the survey binder. Review of survey activities conducted by the Indiana Department of Health indicated complaint surveys were conducted on the following dates: 12/21/23, 2/23/24, 3/15/24, 6/20/24, 7/24/24, and 8/20/24. A current facility policy, revised 4/07, titled, Survey Results, Examination of, provided by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a grievance process according to facility policy for resident and resident representative concerns. Findings include: During record review on 9/24/24 at 10:30 a.m., the facility grievance binder, provided by the Administrator, indicated the following: The most recent grievance was filed on 1/23/24. During an interview, on 9/24/24 at 10:45 a.m., the Administrator indicated the Social Services Director (SSD) was the grievance official for the facility. During an interview, on 9/24/24 at 10:49 a.m., the SSD indicated she was the facility grievance official. Her grievance process was when a resident made a complaint or expressed a concern, it was investigated and resolved immediately. Since issues were resolved immediately there was no need to write the information on a grievance form. She indicated in the last 9 months, there had not been any concerns or complaints that had not been resolved immediately. A current facility policy, revised 4/17, titled, Grievances/Complaints, Filing, provided by the Administrator, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an infection control program which enabled the facility to analyze patterns of known infectious symptoms, prevent the spread of infection, and/or develop programs to prevent recurrence. Findings include: A record review, on 9/24/24 at 10:20 a.m., of the Infection Control Binder, indicated the Infection Log and color coded mapping was completed utilizing the antibiotic Order Listing Report. This report was not printed until 9/23/24 (after the start of the survey), at which point it was printed for the following months: March 2024, April 2024, May 2024, June 2024, July 2024, August 2024, and September 2024. The tracking log lacked indication of tracking and trending of resident infections prior to 9/23/24. During an interview, on 9/24/24 at 10:35 a.m., the Infection Preventionist (IP) indicated she had only been in this position since 9/11/24 and split her time between two different locations. She had printed out the antibiotic orders for the previous months on 9/23/24 and filled out the Infection Log…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0917 — patternMake sure each resident has 1) at least one window to the outside in a room; 2) a room at or above ground level; 3) adequate bedding; 4) furniture that meets the resident's needs; or 5) adequate closet space.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had safe, comfortable chairs in their rooms for resident use. This deficient practice had the potential to impact 34 of 34 of the facilities residents. Findings include: Confidential interviews were completed throughout the survey. 1. During a confidential interview, a resident indicated they would like a chair in their room. They sat on their bed or table. During an observation at that time, the resident sat on their bedside table. 2. During a confidential interview, a resident indicated would like a chair for guests. Visitors usually sit side by side with the resident on the bed. 3. During a confidential interview, a resident indicated it was hard to bring a chair from the dining room if you wanted to sit in a chair. 4. During a confidential interview, a resident indicated they would like a chair in their room. During random observation, the following resident rooms were observed to contain no chair: Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the Indiana Department of Health for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident C) Finding includes: During an interview on 9/24/24 at 10:02 a.m., the Administrator indicated, on 8/11/24, Resident C reported an allegation of Resident D touching her breast that day in the common area. The Administrator had a file of the facility's investigation. Video surveillance had been reviewed for the specified time frame and the allegation was unsubstantiated by the facility. The facility had not reported the alleged abuse to the Indiana Department of Health. During an interview on 9/25/24 at 4:52 p.m., the Administrator indicated he felt Resident C's abuse allegation was not required to be reported the State of Indiana due to the resident's history of false allegations and the investigation results. The facility followed Indiana Department of Health guidelines for reporting of alleged abuse. A current facility policy, dated 2/1/23 and titled ABUSE PREVENTION AND PROHIBITION POLICY, provided by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a complete and thorough investigation of alleged sexual abuse for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident C) Findings include: Confidential interviews were conducted during the course of the survey and indicated the following: Approximately three weeks ago, it was reported to the Social Services Director (SSD) and the Administrator that a male resident,without consent, touched Resident C's breast while seated in a high-backed reclining mobility chair near the entrance of the facility. The location was close to the surveillance camera and the alleged perpetrator was still a resident in the facility. It was reported to the SSD and the Administrator on the date it occurred. During an interview on 9/23/24 at 4:45 p.m., the Administrator indicated the facility had not received any allegations of resident to resident inappropriate touching from 8/3/24 to 9/22/24. The facility's investigations provided from 8/3/24 to 9/22/24 lacked alleged abuse investigations for Resident C or Resident D. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 31) Finding includes: Resident 31's clinical record was reviewed on 9/24/24 at 2:42 p.m. She admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included pain in the right lower leg, alcohol abuse in remission, and stage 3 chronic kidney disease. The clinical record lacked a baseline care plan. During an interview on 9/26/24 at 2:51 p.m., RN 10 indicated a Braden Scale risk assessment should have been completed on admission to the facility. The risk for pressure ulcers was a guide to determine what pressure ulcer prevention interventions were implemented. During an interview on 9/26/24 at 4:27 p.m., the DON indicated she was unable to provide a copy of the resident's baseline care plan because it was not developed on admission. A current facility policy, dated 1/2023, titled Pressure Ulcer/Wound Care, provided by the Infection Preventionist on 9/26/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident upon admission for risk of pressure ulcers and failed to develop and and implement interventions to prevent the development of pressure ulcers when risk was identified. (Resident 31) Finding includes: During an observation on 9/23/24 at 10:12 a.m., Resident 31 was in bed in her room. During an observation on 9/23/24 at 12:54 p.m., the resident was in her bed on her back. She was covered from toes to chin. During an observation on 9/24/24 at 1:44 p.m., the resident was asleep in her bed on her back. Her legs were bent at the knees with her heels directly against the mattress. During an observation on 9/24/24 at 2:24 p.m., the resident was in bed in her room and resting while covered with a blanket. Resident 31's clinical record was reviewed on 9/24/24 at 2:42 p.m. She admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, pain in the right lower leg, alcohol abuse in remission, and stage 3 chronic kidney disease. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions to de-escalate a resident experiencing a behavioral difficulty in a common area with peers for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for behavior management. (Resident 13) Findings include: Confidential interviews were conducted throughout the survey. During a 9/24/24 confidential interview, a resident indicated that Resident 13 was out of control the previous night. Resident 13 beat on walls, punched holes, and threw furniture. He threw furniture that almost hit people. The interviewed resident indicated they were scared. Resident 13's record was reviewed on 9/24/24 at 2:20 p.m. Current diagnoses included schizophrenia, profound intellectual disability, generalized anxiety disorder, and borderline personality disorder. An 8/15/24, quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident 13 was severely cognitively impaired and had displayed both physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others and not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure shift to shift narcotic count and reconciliation was completed for 2 of 2 carts reviewed for medication reconciliation. (West cart and East cart) Findings include: 1. During a medication storage observation of the [NAME] medication cart, on 9/22/24 at 11:21 a.m., accompanied by QMA 6, the Narcotic Count Sheet was reviewed and the following dates lacked shift to shift count and reconciliation signatures of controlled medications: a. August 2024- lacked a narcotic card count: 19th, 20th, 21st, 22nd, 23rd, 24th, 25th, 26th, 27th, 28th, 29th, 30th, and 31st. September 2024- lacked a narcotic card count: 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 6th, 8th, 9th, 10th, 14th, 15th, and 16th. b. August 2024- lacked shift-to-shift narcotic reconciliation signatures: 8/16: 10:00 p.m. - 6:00 a.m., 8/17: 10:00 p.m. - 2:00 a.m., 8/21: 6:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. and 2:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m., 8/25: 6:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. - 6:00 a.m., 8/27: 6:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. and 2:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m., 8/29: 6:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. and 2:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m., 8/31:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to appropriately date stored medications, discard expired insulin vials, and label medications with resident information in 2 of 2 medication carts observed for medication storage. (West cart and East cart) Findings include: 1. During a medication storage observation of the [NAME] medication cart, on [DATE] at 11:21 a.m., accompanied by QMA 6, the following was observed: a. One Levemir (insulin) vial with approximately 25 units remaining, with an open date of [DATE]. b. Sixty-six (66) single packets of 4% lidocaine (topical anesthetic) patches without resident identifiers or manufacturer container information. During an interview, at the time of the observation, QMA 6 indicated she was not insulin certified and did not know how long insulin was good for. During an interview, at the time of the observation, the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated opened insulin was good for 30 days. 2. During a medication storage observation of the East medication cart, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications received from the contracted pharmaceutical company were labeled appropriately for 1 of 9 residents reviewed for medication use. Findings include: During a medication administration observation on 7/23/24 at 5:29 a.m., two bottles of oral Nystatin (antifungal) were observed in the medication cart and lacked labeling with resident identifiers and instructions. Bottle 1 lacked the resident's name, dosage and time/frequency the medication was to be given. The bottle also had a sticker with an opened date of 7/10/24. Bottle 2 lacked the resident's name, dosage, and time/frequency the medication was to be given. During an interview, on 7/23/24 at 5:29 a.m., RN 1 indicated she did not know to whom the medications were prescribed. There were two residents who were currently prescribed the medication. No other bottles of Nystatin were observed in the medication carts. The medications should have been labeled with the residents name and directions for use. During an interview, on 7/23/24 at 9:31…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent a sexual interaction between two cognitively impaired residents for 2 out of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident E and Resident F) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 2/22/24 at 2:33 p.m Diagnoses include dementia with behaviors, stage 3 kidney disease, and hypertension. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 2/22/24 at 2:43 p.m Diagnoses include severe dementia with agitation, delirium, and anxiety disorder. No MDS information available due to being newly admitted to the facility. Review of a facility self reportable, dated 2/15/24 at 3:05 p.m., indicated on 2/14/24 at 6:01 p.m., upon entering the room of Resident E, CNA 2 observed Resident F standing in front of Resident E while sitting in his wheelchair. Resident F had the front of her night gown…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff reported an incident of inappropriate sexual contact between 2 cognitively impaired residents to the Administrator immediately, which delayed the submission and reporting of the incident within the required timeframe to the appropriate State Agencies for 1 of 3 facility reported incidents reviewed. (Resident E and Resident F) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 2/22/24 at 2:33 p.m Diagnoses include dementia with behaviors, stage 3 kidney disease, and hypertension. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 2/22/24 at 2:43 p.m. Diagnoses include severe dementia with agitation, delirium, and anxiety disorder. No MDS available due to being recently admitted to the facility. Review of a facility self reportable, dated 2/15/24 at 3:05 p.m., indicated on 2/14/24 at 6:01 p.m., upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement individualized care plan interventions and monitoring of behaviors for a cognitively impaired resident with dementia for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for behaviors. (Resident E) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 2/22/24 at 2:33 p.m Diagnoses include dementia with behaviors, stage 3 kidney disease, and hypertension. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of a facility self reportable, dated 2/15/24 at 3:05 p.m., indicated on 2/14/24 at 6:01 p.m., upon entering the room of Resident E, CNA 2 observed a cognitively impaired female resident standing in front of Resident E while sitting in his wheelchair. The female resident had the front of her night gown pulled up and Resident E had his hands inside her briefs. When CNA 2 asked what they were doing, Resident E pulled his hands out of the female resident's brief. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain clean and uncluttered laundry facilities, clean bathroom air vents, and safe closet doors during random observations of the facility. Findings include: During a medication administration observation on 11/16/23 at 8:08 a.m., Resident 19 indicated he felt his sinus pressure was related to the debris in the bathroom ceiling fan, where you could not even see the fan blades for all the lint and mouse droppings. During an observation with QMA 4 at the time of the medication administration, the bathroom air vent had a large amount of dark, thick, dust-like debris. The bathroom walls were had a large number of gnats on them. The wall to the right of the heating and air unit was bowed out from the wall. On 11/16/23 at 8:10 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with the right bi-fold closet door out of the track and hanging loose. On 11/16/23 at 12:56 p.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with the right bi-fold closet door out of the track and hanging…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free from pests and rodents. Findings include: During a confidential interview on 11/16/23, a staff member indicated mice were observed frequently in the halls and resident rooms. The facility cat had a mouse in his mouth in the hallway the morning of 11/15/23. During a confidential interview on 11/16/23 at 2:11 p.m., a staff member indicated the facility had a gnat and mouse problem. During a confidential interview on 11/16/23 at 2:18 p.m., a staff member indicated there was a mouse problem in the facility and they were seen frequently in inside the facility. During an observation in Resident 19's bathroom, all four walls had a large number of gnats and many were observed flying around the room. Gnats were observed flying in the hallway and dining area. During an interview on 11/16/23 at 11:24 a.m., the Administrator indicated pest control came to the facility monthly to treat for spiders, gnats, and mice. The pest control provider would come to the facility for other treatments as requested. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by CNA 12 for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident B). Findings include: Review of video footage with audio, on 8/29/23 at 11:00 a.m., indicated on 8/19/23 Resident B was being escorted in his wheelchair to his room from the nurses station area. CNA 12 pushed his wheelchair while CNA 23 walked backwards holding his legs from touching the ground. LPN 8 held a gown on the right side of him to shield the other staff member from him spitting on them. As they entered his room, a staff member called Resident B a nasty a--. Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 8/29/23 at 10:38 a.m. Diagnoses included uncomplicated alcohol dependence, Wernicke's encephalopathy, delusional disorders, mild cognitive impairment of uncertain or unknown etiology, other seizures, drug induced subacute dyskinesia, major depressive disorder, recurrent severe without psychotic features, generalized anxiety disorder, psychotic disorder with hallucinations due to known physiological…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure yearly dementia in-service training was conducted for 2 of 5 staff members reviewed for employee records (RN 15 and LPN 8). Findings include: Employee records were reviewed on 8/30/23 at 9:15 a.m. RN 15's last dementia training was completed on 6/1/22. LPN 8's last dementia training was completed on 2/23/22. During an interview with the Interim DON, on 8/30/23 at 12:46 p.m., she indicated the facility could not locate a policy regarding training at that time. No further information was provided prior to exit. This Federal tag relates to complaint IN00416170. 3.1-19(u)
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to assess for root cause of falls and update care plans for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for falls (Resident K and L). Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident K was reviewed on 8/8/2023 at 11:17 a.m. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, overactive bladder, dementia with anxiety, depression, conversion disorder with seizures, and fibromyalgia. A post fall risk assessment, dated 6/23/2023, indicated the resident was a high risk for falls. A progress note, dated 7/1/2023 at 7:50 a.m., indicated the resident had a witnessed fall. The resident indicated she lost her balance and fell, hitting her head on a table. The fall resulted in a small cut on her left side of her head by the hair line measuring 0.05 cm (centimeters) length x 0.05 cm width. A post fall risk assessment, dated 7/1/2023, indicated the resident was a high risk for falls. A current care plan for the problem of falls, dated 7/23/2019, was last revised on 3/8/2020. The most recent fall care plan intervention was dated 5/4/2023. The facility failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2026-05-21 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Indiana Department of Health Annual Survey Report was readily available for review for residents and visitors without requiring to request the report from a staff member. Findings include:During a Resident Group Interview, on 5/19/26 at 9:55 a.m., the residents indicated they did not know where the Indiana Depart of Health Survey Report was available for review. Two residents indicated they would like to review the annual survey report and did not know where it was located.During an observation, on 5/19/26 at 10:40 a.m., a framed sign posted on the wall by the entrance/exit front doors adjacent to the nurses station, approximately 8 inches by 10 inches, had multiple lines of information listed. The sign was posted over 6 feet high. The last line of posted information indicated the Annual Survey results were available at the nurse's desk.During an interview and observation, on 5/19/26 at 10:46 a.m., LPN 3 indicated she believed the Indiana Depart of Health Annual Survey Report binder was located…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2026-05-21 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure daily staff posting was readily accessible and visible to residents and visitors for 5 of 5 days reviewed for staff posting. Findings include: During a general facility observation on 5/17/26 at 10:18 a.m. the daily staff posting was framed on a wall behind the nurse's station and located such that it could not be read without entering the nurse's station.During a general facility observation on 5/18/26 at 10:10 a.m. the daily staff posting was framed on a wall behind the nurse's station and located such that it could not be read without entering the nurse's station.During a general facility observation on 5/19/26 at 8:03 a.m. the daily staff posting was framed on a wall behind the nurse's station and located such that it could not be read without entering the nurse's station.During a general facility observation on 5/20/26 at 8:34 a.m. the daily staff posting was framed on a wall behind the nurse's station and located such that it could not be read without entering the nurse's station.During a general facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-09-26 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to make nurse staffing information readily available in a readable format to residents and visitors daily for 3 of 3 days reviewed. Findings include: During an observation, on 9/22/24 at 10:14 a.m., no direct care staffing numbers were posted. During an observation, on 9/23/24 at 10:52 a.m., no direct care staffing numbers were posted. During an observation, on 9/24/24 at 11:08 a.m., no direct care staffing numbers were posted. During an interview, on 9/24/24 at 12:34 p.m., the DON indicated the schedule book was kept at the nurse station, and this was used for staff posting. The schedule book contained the handwritten schedules for staff. During an interview, on 9/24/24 at 1:44 p.m., the Administrator indicated he was not sure what staff posting was missing. He referred to the schedule book as it listed the daily staff schedule, and the shift assigned. A current facility policy, revised 7/16, titled, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, provided by the DON, on 9/24/24 at 2:39 p.m., indicated the following: .1. Within…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in IN
CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 15E064. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.