No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Munster Med-Inn

7935 Calumet Ave, Munster, IN 46321 · Government - County · 225 certified beds · (219) 836-8300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus Facility (federal watch list)Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 actual-harm citations2 immediate-jeopardy citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0609) — most recent Jan 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

/5
CMS overall
Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verifiedNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ)Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facilityNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
7847 Calumet Ave · (855) 383-7095 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
7905 Calumet Ave · (219) 836-6110 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Marathon0.1 mi
7890 Calumet Ave · (219) 836-5113 · Call to confirm hours
Park
8201 Tapper Ave · (219) 836-6900 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
8001 Euclid Ave · (219) 836-3151

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measuresNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.3%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.9%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.1%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms27.9%25.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.9%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.1%23.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine75.9%95.4%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.7%3.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.1%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.5%13.6%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine72.6%79.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.8%22.2%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.8%10.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.911.611.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.661.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 142 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
43.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 43.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 90 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.5%CMS range 36.3–52.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 7.5–13.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge43.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge44.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge94.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened8.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.6%CMS range 7.3–13.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.291.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.41
RN hours/ resident / day
0.95
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.07
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.43
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 225 beds and averages 168.2 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 57 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

22
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-28)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-22)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

57 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to implement measures to prevent resident-to-resident verbal and physical abuse to a cognitively impaired dependent resident (Resident C) by his roommate (Resident B), who had a history of behaviors and recent verbal abuse toward Resident C, resulting in a physical altercation where Resident B struck Resident C in the face causing observed bruising, a bloody nose and swelling to his left jaw and cheek as well as facial fractures for 2 of 8 residents reviewed for abuse. The immediate jeopardy began on 12/11/25 when a resident with a history of known physical and verbal behaviors was involved in a resident-to-resident verbal altercation with his roommate, which later escalated on a different day into a resident-to-resident physical altercation causing harm and a fractured facial bone. The Administrator, Director of Nursing, [NAME] President of Operations, and Nurse Consultant were notified of the immediate jeopardy at 5:20 p.m. on 1/27/26. The immediate jeopardy was removed, and the deficient practice corrected on 12/29/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility staff failed to report resident-to-resident verbal abuse from a resident with known behaviors (Resident B) towards his roommate (Resident C) to administration, which resulted in a lack of interventions to prevent later physical abuse for 2 of 8 residents reviewed for abuse. (Residents B and C) The immediate jeopardy began on 12/11/25 when a resident with a history of known physical and verbal behaviors was involved in a resident-to-resident verbal altercation with his roommate, which later escalated on a different day into a resident-to-resident physical altercation causing harm and a fractured jawbone. The Administrator, Director of Nursing, [NAME] President of Operations, and Nurse Consultant were notified of the immediate jeopardy at 5:20 p.m., on 1/27/26. The immediate jeopardy was removed, and the deficient practice corrected, on 12/29/25, prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past Noncompliance. Finding includes:The record for Resident B was reviewed on 1/22/26 at 9:40 a.m. at 9:40 a.m. Diagnoses included, but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2026-01-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident assessed without limited range of motion upon therapy discharge received recommended restorative services resulting in the development of a contracture to the right hand for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for range of motion. (Resident M)Finding includes:During random observations on 1/20/26 at 12:41 p.m., on 1/21/26 at 9:12 a.m.,1/22/26 at 9:24 a.m. and 1:18 p.m., and on 1/23/26 at 8:00 a.m. and 8:17 a.m., Resident M was observed in bed. At those times, the resident's right hand was closed in the shape of a fist. The resident indicated he could not move that hand or open it. There was no anticontracture device observed in his hand. The record for Resident M was reviewed on 1/23/26 at 11:05 a.m Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, monoplegia of upper limb affecting right side and dementia. The 12/2/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance were provided to a dependent resident who required total assistance of staff for bed mobility for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident B) This deficient practice resulted in a fall and the resident sustained a left femur fracture. Finding includes: A confidential interview indicated Resident B fell out of bed while being repositioned with only one staff member and the resident sustained a leg fracture, the same leg that was fractured during a fall in October 2024. An additional confidential interview indicated the resident was having surgery on 12/4/24 due to re-injuring the left leg. The record for Resident B was reviewed on 12/4/24 at 1:42 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, displaced oblique fracture of the shaft of the left femur, vascular dementia with behavior disturbance, type 2 diabetes, protein-calorie malnutrition, and orthopedic aftercare. A Fall Risk Evaluation, dated 10/11/24, indicated the resident was at high risk for falls.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure mechanical lift straps were safe for use prior to a transfer of a dependent resident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for falls. (Resident B) This deficient practice resulted in a strap breaking during a transfer, the resident falling from the lift, and the resident sustaining a left femur fracture. B. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure hot water temperatures were below 120 degrees Fahrenheit on 2 of 4 floors throughout the facility. (The 5th and 2nd floors) Findings include: A. A confidential interview indicated Resident B fell from a mechanical lift when the sling straps broke, and the resident sustained a leg fracture. On 10/15/24 at 2:54 p.m., Resident B was observed in bed. A blue leg immobilizer was observed on the resident's left leg. The record for Resident B was reviewed on 10/17/24 at 1:26 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, displaced oblique fracture of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-28 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the mandatory submission of staffing information, based on payroll data, was electronically submitted to iQIES. This had the potential to affect the 164 residents who resided in the facility. The deficient practice was corrected on 12/18/25, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. The facility identified the concern and immediately reviewed all PBJ data for the affected submission period. All previous submissions were audited and all prior submissions had been submitted and received timely. Administrative staff responsible for PBJ submission were re-educated immediately on CMS PBJ requirements and submission timelines. A standardized PBJ submission process was implemented, including monthly internal deadlines ahead of CMS due dates. All PBJ submission information will be reviewed by [NAME] President (VP) of Operations, VP of Quality Measures, and Senior HR director 15 days prior to CMS submission due date. A second audit will be completed by Senior HR director 5 days prior to CMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-28 · tag F0554 — pattern
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed to self-administer medications and had Physician's Orders for the medication for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for self-administration of medication. (Residents P, 161, 155, Q and X)Findings include:1. During a random observation on 1/21/26 at 1:20 p.m., Resident P was observed in her room in bed. A bottle of Rolaids was observed on the resident's overbed table. During an interview at that time, the resident indicated she needed the Rolaids due to her stomach problems. During a random observation on 1/22/26 at 9:19 a.m., the bottle of Rolaids remained on the resident's overbed table. The record for Resident P was reviewed on 1/23/26 at 10:45 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes, need for assistance with personal care, anxiety, and pressure ulcer of the sacral region. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/6/26, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident did not have a care plan related to self-administering medications.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) were completed for dependent residents related to facial hair, long and dirty fingernails, bathing, greasy hair, incontinence care, providing assistance with meals and adaptive equipment for eating for 10 of 13 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Residents P, O, H, G, M, K, Q, R, L and N)Findings include:1. During an interview on 1/21/26 at 1:20 p.m., Resident P indicated that she had not had a shower since she had been admitted in October, only bed baths, and she needed her hair washed. Observation at that time, indicated the resident's hair was matted in the back. The record for Resident P was reviewed on 1/23/26 at 10:45 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes, need for assistance with personal care, anxiety, and pressure ulcer of the sacral region. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/6/26, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and dependent on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure skin tears were assessed and monitored and treatments were completed as ordered for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions, interventions were in place for a resident with hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization, and medications were held without parameters for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Residents D, Y, X, and V)Findings include: 1.The closed record for Resident D was reviewed on 1/22/26 at 8:57 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behavior disturbance, stroke, and allergic contact dermatitis. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/27/25, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making and she required partial to moderate assistance from staff for rolling left to right and for bed to chair transfers. A Care Plan, dated 3/20/24 and reviewed on 11/28/25, indicated the resident had an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit related…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper medication storage related to medications at the bedside for residents who did not self-administer medications and loose pills observed in the medication carts for 4 of 5 units. (Residents P and 145, Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth Floors)Findings include: 1.During a random observation on 1/21/26 at 1:20 p.m., a syringe of normal saline wrapped in plastic was observed on Resident P's bedside stand. On 1/22/26 at 9:19 a.m., the syringe of normal saline remained on the resident's bedside stand. The record for Resident P was reviewed on 1/23/26 at 10:45 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes, need for assistance with personal care, anxiety, and pressure ulcer of the sacral region. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/6/26, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident did not have a care plan related to self-administering medications. The resident did not have a Self-Administration of Medication Assessment completed. During an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to keep the kitchen clean and in good repair related to food debris on shelves and refrigerator doors, lime build up on the outside of the dishwasher, lack of sanitation solution in the sanitizing buckets, and food not labeled and dated in the pantries located on the units for 1 of 1 kitchen and 5 of 5 units. (The Main Kitchen and the First, Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth Floors) Findings include: 1. During the Kitchen Sanitation Tour on 1/20/26 at 9:07 a.m., with the Food Service Manager (FSM) the following was observed: a. There was dried spillage on the front door of the reach in freezer that housed the frozen health shakes. b. Two sanitation buckets registered zero parts per million (ppm) of quaternary solution.c. An accumulation of lime build up was observed on the outside of the dishwasher.d. The floor underneath the dishwasher had an accumulation of dirt and debris. e. The cabinet next to the dishwasher had food debris on the shelves. During an interview at that time, the FSM indicated the above was in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were in place and implemented related to wearing gloves in the hallway, not changing gloves after providing incontinence care and bathing, not wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) in enhanced barrier precaution rooms, and failing to disinfect multi-use equipment during random infection control observations. (Resident 128 and Second and Third Floor)Findings include:1. During a random observation on 1/22/26 at 1:57 p.m., Housekeeper 1 was observed on the Second Floor wearing gloves in the hallway. She proceeded to the soiled utility room to dispose of some garbage. She continued to wear the gloves after exiting the soiled utility room. She then proceeded to the nurse's station carrying a broom and was wearing the same pair of gloves. At 2:08 p.m., the Housekeeper was pushing her cart down the odd hall and was wearing gloves. At 2:14 p.m., the Housekeeper continued to walk up and down the odd hall while wearing gloves. During an interview on 1/27/26 at 2:00 p.m., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident's right to make choices were honored related to showers given per preference for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for choices. (Resident U)Finding includes:During an interview on 1/20/26 at 10:44 a.m., Resident U indicated he preferred to have showers but was only being given bed baths since he had a stroke. The resident's record was reviewed on 1/22/26 at 2:55 p.m. Diagnoses included, but was not limited to, multiple sclerosis, cerebral infarction and peripheral vascular disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 12/22/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact, had range of motion impairment to both sides and was dependent for toileting and transfers.The Quarterly Preferences for Customary Routine and Activities, dated 5/8/25, indicated it was very important to the resident to choose between a tub bath, bed bath, shower or sponge bath. The bathing tasks for November and December 2025 and January 2026 indicated the resident received one shower on 12/11/25. The remaining days he was given…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) anti-anxiety medications were not prescribed longer than 14 days. The facility also failed to ensure interventions were attempted prior to administering PRN anti-anxiety medications for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Residents P and B)Findings include: 1.The record for Resident P was reviewed on 1/23/26 at 10:45 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes, need for assistance with personal care, anxiety, and pressure ulcer of the sacral region. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/6/26, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and she had received anti-anxiety medication within the last seven days. A Care Plan, dated 10/2/25 and reviewed on 12/30/25, indicated the resident used anti-anxiety medication related to having an anxiety disorder. A Physician's Order, dated 10/1/25, indicated the resident was to receive Xanax (an anti-anxiety medication) 0.25 milligrams (mg) every 24 hours PRN for agitation or anxiety until 11/26/25. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was involved in and informed of new medications ordered by the physician for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for care planning decision. (Resident 17)Finding includes: During an interview on 1/21/26 at 9:37 a.m., Resident 17 indicated she was given an iron pill but was never informed who ordered it. She indicated she some labs done and then after that the iron pill appeared with her daily medication. The record for Resident 17 was reviewed on 1/27/26 at 11:15 a.m. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, heart failure, dementia, high blood pressure, hypothyroidism, anemia, and osteoarthritis.The 12/1/25 Annual Minimum Data Set assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. A Physician's Order, dated 7/16/25, indicated Ferrous Sulfate tablet 325 milligrams (mg), give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for low Iron.A Physician's Order, dated 10/18/25 and discontinued on 1/22/26, indicated Levothyroxine Sodium tablet 150 micrograms (mcg), give by mouth in the morning.There was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of quality were maintained related to CNAs removing dressings to pressure ulcers for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident P)Finding includes: On 1/28/26 at 11:54 a.m., the Wound Nurse was observed providing wound care for Resident P. She prepared the supplies outside of the resident's room and donned a gown and gloves prior to entering. Upon entering the room, the resident was positioned on her left side and there was no dressing to the sacrum (a triangular bone at the base of the spine). CNA 5 was in the room at that time, she indicated she had just provided incontinence care and she removed the dressing because it was soiled. The Wound Nurse proceeded to treat the area to the sacrum. The record for Resident P was reviewed on 1/23/26 at 10:45 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes, need for assistance with personal care, anxiety, and stage 4 pressure ulcer of the sacral region (skin breakdown that involves full-thickness tissue loss…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an ongoing activity program was implemented for cognitively impaired and dependent residents for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for activities. (Residents 2 and K)Findings include: 1. On 1/22/26 at 9:34 a.m. and 1:39 p.m., Resident 2 was observed in his room in bed with his eyes open and his television turned on. On 1/23/26 at 10:40 a.m. and 2:30 p.m., the resident remained in his room in bed with his television turned on. The record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 1/27/26 at 9:15 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, bone and prostate cancer, vascular dementia with mood disturbance, stroke, and major depressive disorder. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/21/25, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and music and animals such as pets were very important to him. The Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/6/25, indicated the resident remained moderately impaired for daily decision making and he had little interest or pleasure in doing things. He was also dependent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place and the correct treatment was provided for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Residents T and U)Findings Include:1.On 1/27/26 at 10:15 a.m., Resident T's wound care was observed with the Wound Nurse. The resident was positioned on his left side in his bed. There was a small pressure ulcer, approximately 0.5 centimeter long on his sacrum. The nurse cleansed the area with normal saline and gauze, patted it dry, then applied a hydrocolloid dressing to cover the wound.The resident's record was reviewed on 1/22/26 at 9:40 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fracture of the left humerus and cellulitis of the left lower extremity.The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/1/25, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and needed partial/moderate assist with bed mobility and transfers. A Physician's Order, dated 12/19/25, indicated to cleanse the sacrum with normal saline and/ or wound cleanser, apply skin prep to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a resident with swallowing precautions and failed to keep sharp objects out of a resident's room who resided on the memory care unit for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for accidents. (Residents M and 1)Findings include: 1. During a random observation on 1/21/26 at 9:12 a.m. Resident M was observed in bed eating breakfast. The resident was served eggs and some type of ground meat. The meal ticket indicated supervision with meals, no straws, and to check mouth after solids. The resident should be upright during the meal and to take small bites and alternate solids and liquids. The resident had a straw in his water cup. There was no staff in the room while he was eating. During a random observation 1/23/26 at 8:17 a.m., the resident was observed in bed eating his breakfast. He was served two scoops of scrambled eggs, a bowl of oatmeal and two pieces of toast. He was served a cup of thickened orange juice and carton of thickened milk. The resident was observed feeding himself with no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident received the correct diet as ordered for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 16)Finding includes:On 1/20/26 at 12:10 p.m., Resident 16 was observed in bed in his room. A staff member entered the room and brought his lunch tray. He asked for it to be set on the table for later. The lunch was a slice of meatloaf, one scoop of mashed potatoes with gravy and vegetable. The tray ticket indicated Heart Healthy diet, double portions. At 12:17 p.m., LPN 4 observed the lunch tray and ticket and indicated it was not double portion.The resident's record was reviewed on 1/22/26 at 1:16 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus and dependence on renal dialysis.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 12/4/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and needed set up assist for eating. A Physician's Order, dated 11/10/25, indicated CKD (Renal) diet, regular texture. There was no order for double portions. During an interview on 1/22/26 at 1:34 p.m., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' oxygen was set at the correct flow rate for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen. (Residents M and X)Findings include: 1. During a random observation on 1/20/26 at 12:41 p.m., Resident M was observed in bed wearing oxygen via nasal cannula. At that time, the oxygen flow rate was set at 0.5 liters per minute. During a random observation on 1/21/26 at 9:12 a.m., the resident was observed in bed wearing oxygen via nasal cannula. At that time, the oxygen flow rate was set at 1 liter per minute. The record for Resident M was reviewed on 1/23/26 at 11:05 a.m Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, monoplegia of upper limb affecting right side, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), COPD, chronic respiratory failure, major depressive disorder, dementia, and heart failure. The 12/2/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision received oxygen while a resident. A Care Plan, revised on 12/12/25, indicated the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a scheduled pain medication was available and administered as ordered for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident F)Finding includes:Resident F's closed record was reviewed on 1/21/26 at 2:15 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus, repeated falls, and unspecified protein calorie malnutrition.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 11/17/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and had a stage 3 (full-thickness skin injury appearing as a deep crater where subcutaneous fat is visible, but muscle, tendon, or bone are not exposed) pressure ulcer.The Pain Care Plan, dated 6/19/23, indicated the resident was on pain medication related to cancer of left breast, chronic pain syndrome and arthritis. Interventions included, but were not limited to, administer analgesic medications as ordered.A Physician's Order, dated 4/9/24, indicated to give fentanyl transdermal patch (opioid pain medication), 50 micrograms/hour every 72 hours for pain.The November and December…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide routine dental services for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Dental Services. (Resident V)Finding includes:During an interview on 1/21/26 at 10:46 a.m., Resident V indicated he had only seen the dentist once since he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 1/22/26 at 9:31 a.m., Resident V's bottom lower teeth were observed to be broken and dark in color. At that time, he indicated his teeth had been breaking off, and that he wanted to see a dentist. The resident's record was reviewed on 1/23/26 at 10:36 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) following a stroke, diabetes, adult failure to thrive, and need for assistance with personal care. The 12/10/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making and was dependent in activities of daily living (ADLs) and transfers. A Physician's Order, dated 12/3/25, indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented related to incorrect documentation of medications administered for 1 of 36 records reviewed. (Resident X)Finding includes: During observation of a medication pass on 1/22/26 at 9:37 a.m., Resident X asked LPN 6 for Maalox (an anti-acid) and Miralax (a powdered laxative). LPN 6 questioned the resident which one of the medications she wanted. The resident indicated both of the medications were on her MAR (medication administration record), and that she needed both of them because they were for different problems. LPN 6 then prepared and administered Lactulose (a medication used to treat constipation or high ammonia levels) to the resident, and told her it was Miralax. The resident questioned why it was not mixed with water. LPN 6 indicated what she gave her did the same thing. The resident's record was reviewed on 1/22/26 at 2:20 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic respiratory failure, diabetes, breast cancer,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of quality were maintained related to CNAs removing dressings to pressure ulcers and QMAs signing out wound care treatments for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Residents B, C, and D)Findings include:1.On 10/27/25 at 1:52 p.m., the Wound Nurse was observed providing wound care for Resident B. She prepared the supplies outside of the resident's room and donned a gown and gloves prior to entering. Upon entering the room, the resident was positioned on his right side and there was no dressing to the sacrum (a triangular bone at the base of the spine). The Wound Nurse indicated the resident had incontinence care completed prior to her entering the room. The Wound Nurse proceeded to treat the area to the sacrum. After the treatment was complete, the Wound Nurse asked for assistance from CNA 1 to complete incontinence care again around the resident's rectal tube. During an interview on 10/27/25 at 2:25 p.m., CNA 1 indicated she had provided incontinence care prior to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure blood pressure medications were held based on parameters for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for blood pressure parameters. (Resident E) The facility also failed to ensure treatments to skin conditions non-pressure related were completed as ordered for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Residents D and C) Findings include: 1.The record for Resident E was reviewed on 10/28/25 at 11:13 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure and hypertension. The 10/17/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A current Care Plan indicated the resident was at risk for complications secondary to the diagnosis of hypertension including altered cardiac output and ineffective tissue perfusion. Interventions included, but were not limited to, give antihypertensive medications as ordered. Physician's Orders, dated 10/2/25, indicated the resident was to receive Coreg (a blood pressure medication) 6.25 milligrams (mg) twice a day for hypertension.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcers treatments were completed as ordered for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Residents B, D, and C) Findings include:1.On 10/27/25 at 1:52 p.m., the Wound Nurse was observed providing wound care for Resident B. She prepared the supplies outside of the resident's room and donned a gown and gloves prior to entering. Upon entering the room, the resident was positioned on his right side and there was no dressing to the sacrum (a triangular bone at the base of the spine). The Wound Nurse indicated the resident had incontinence care prior to her entering the room. The Wound Nurse proceeded to clean the sacral wound with Dakin's (an antiseptic solution used to treat wounds) soaked gauze. After cleansing the wound bed, she removed her gloves, donned new gloves, and cleansed the area to the sacrum again with Dakin's soaked gauze. The Wound Nurse then applied skin prep (a protective barrier wipe) to the wound edges and packed the wound bed with Dakin's soaked kerlix gauze and applied…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control guidelines were in place and implemented related to not performing hand hygiene before and after glove removal and not wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) while performing wound care for 3 of 3 residents observed for wound care. (Residents B, D, and C) Findings include: 1.On 10/27/25 at 1:52 p.m., the Wound Nurse was observed providing wound care for Resident B. She prepared the supplies outside of the resident's room and donned a gown and gloves prior to entering. She did not sanitize or wash her hands prior to donning the gloves. The Wound Nurse proceeded to clean the sacral wound with Dakin's (an antiseptic solution used to treat wounds) soaked gauze. After cleansing the wound bed, she removed her gloves and donned new gloves without hand sanitizing. She then proceeded to cleanse the wound again with Dakin's soaked gauze. The Wound Nurse then removed her gown and gloves and proceeded to the treatment cart to obtain skin prep pads. She did not sanitize her hands after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to keep the kitchen clean and in good repair related to dirty convection ovens, transportation carts, food preparation tables, the steam table, and the reach in coolers, as well as stacking clean but wet plates and dome lids on top of each other, and improper glove usage while preparing ready to eat food for 1 of 1 kitchen. (The Main Kitchen) This had the potential to affect 154 of 155 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: 1. During the Kitchen Sanitation Tour on 10/15/24 at 9:44 a.m., with the Food Service Manager (FSM) the following was observed: a. The sides, doors, and inside of the convection ovens were dirty with a large and heavy accumulation of grease and burned food spillage on the bottom racks. b. There was a large scoop inside the sugar bin laying directly on the sugar. c. The sides of the food preparation table and the steam table were dirty with dried food spillage. d. There were 5 open transportation carts that housed dirty trays and dishes from the units. The carts had dried…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to invite and hold care planning conferences for residents and/or their family members. The facility also failed to update a care plan related to preferences of wearing a hospital gown for 6 of 33 residents whose care plans were reviewed. (Residents 1, 9, 129, 141, 72, and 31) Findings include: 1. During random observations on 10/15/24 at 2:32 p.m., on 10/16/24 at 3:57 p.m., and on 10/17/24 at 9:49 a.m., 11:36 a.m., and 2:08 p.m., Resident 1 was observed lying in bed wearing a hospital gown. The record for Resident 1 was reviewed on 10/17/24 at 1:35 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, multiple sclerosis, neuromuscular bladder, vascular dementia, major depressive disorder, anemia, high blood pressure, anxiety, and pain. The 8/30/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was not cognitively intact and was severely impaired for daily decision making. The resident was dependent on staff for dressing. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care related to long and dirty fingernails and facial hair for 4 of 11 residents reviewed for ADL's. (Residents 1, 6, 129, and 116) Findings include: 1. During random observations on 10/15/24 at 2:32 p.m., on 10/16/24 at 3:57 p.m., on 10/17/24 at 9:49 a.m., 11:36 a.m. and 2:08 p.m., and on 10/18/24 at 9:10 a.m., Resident 1 was observed with long fingernails on both hands. The record for Resident 1 was reviewed on 10/17/24 at 1:35 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, multiple sclerosis, neuromuscular bladder, vascular dementia, major depressive disorder, anemia, high blood pressure, anxiety, and pain. The 8/30/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was not cognitively intact and was severely impaired for daily decision making. The resident was dependent on staff for dressing, toileting, eating, personal and oral hygiene. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-22 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to correctly prepare a pureed (blended smooth) diet designed to meet the needs of the residents. This had the potential to affect 10 of 10 residents who received a pureed diet. Findings include: 1. During the pureed meal observation on 10/21/24 at 10:05 a.m., Dietary [NAME] 1 was preparing to make pureed bread for the lunch meal. At that time, there was no recipe in front of her to view. She indicated she was making enough for 15 pureed diets, however, there were only 10 residents who had orders for a pureed meal. She removed 7 slices of bread, broke them into little pieces and placed them in the blender. She poured milk from an 8 ounce carton into a measuring cup and indicated it was about 4 ounces and proceeded to pour it into the blender. She continued to add more bread and milk for a total of 27 pieces of bread and 4 (8) ounce cartons of milk to make the pureed bread. The Food Service Manager (FSM) stood by the cook during the preparation. The recipe for pureed bread, provided by the FSM, indicated the following: 10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to keep the residents' environment clean and in good repair related to dirty floors, toilets, walls, tube feeding poles, ceiling vents, overflowing garbage cans, and debris in light fixtures. The facility also failed to keep the kitchen clean related to food splattered on walls, dirty floors, and dirty piping under the dish machine for 4 of 4 floors and 1 of 1 kitchens. (The 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th floors, and the main kitchen) Findings include: 1. During a random observation on 10/15/24 at 11:27 a.m., there was an overflowing garbage can that contained personal protective equipment in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Yellow isolation gowns and gloves were observed on the floor. There was 1 resident who resided in the room. 2. During an interview on 10/15/24 at 2:48 p.m., a family member indicated the room always smelled like urine and the floors were so dirty they have cleaned it themselves. They have noticed housekeeping did not clean the room every day. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's dignity was maintained related to being exposed from the doorway and wearing a hospital gown while in bed during the day for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for dignity. (Residents 91, 120, and 92) Findings include: 1. On 10/15/24 at 10:36 a.m., 11:10 a.m. and 3:11 p.m., Resident 91 was observed in his room seated in his wheelchair. The resident was wearing a shirt and an incontinence brief. The resident's bed was located near the door and the door to the room was open. The resident was visible from the hallway. On 10/17/24 at 10:10 a.m., the resident was again seated in his wheelchair in his room wearing a shirt and his incontinence brief. The door to the resident's room was open and he was visible from the hallway. The record for Resident 91 was reviewed on 10/17/24 at 10:36 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, dementia with behavior disturbance, and major depressive disorder. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/5/24, indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and in place for anti-anxiety medications for 1 of 33 resident care plans reviewed. (Resident 139) Finding includes: The record for Resident 139 was reviewed on 10/21/24 at 9:28 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and depression. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/23/24, indicated the resident was mildly cognitively impaired and received anti-anxiety and antipsychotic medications. A Physician's Order, dated 4/2/24, indicated the resident was to receive ABH (Ativan/Benadryl/Haldol) gel (a hospice medication for agitation) to the wrist topically two times a day for agitation and aggressive behavior. The Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 10/2024, indicated the resident had received the ABH gel medication twice a day. There was a lack of any current care plan for the anti-anxiety medication, agitation, or aggressive behaviors. During an interview on 10/21/24 at 4:41 p.m., the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure areas of bruising and scabbing were assessed and monitored, and treatments were in place for non-pressure skin injuries for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for skin conditions non-pressure related. (Residents 56, 79, and 6) Findings include: 1. On 10/15/24 at 11:07 a.m., Resident 56 was observed in his room in bed. He had an area of reddish/purple discoloration to the top of his left hand. The record for Resident 56 was reviewed on 10/18/24 at 10:30 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, anemia, and type 2 diabetes. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/20/24, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired for daily decision making and required substantial to maximum assistance with rolling left and right and for chair to bed transfers. The resident did not have a current care plan related to the bruising to his left hand. A Weekly Skin Observation form, dated 10/17/24, indicated the resident's skin was intact and there was no documentation related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure preventative measures were in place to prevent pressure ulcers related to the development of a new pressure area behind a resident's ear for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 129) Finding includes: During a random observation on 10/17/24 at 2:25 p.m., Resident 129 was observed up and dressed wheeling himself down the hallway. The resident was not wearing any shoes and did not have his oxygen on. CNA 1 told the resident she would help him get something on his feet and instructed him to go back to his room. As the resident turned his wheelchair around, his left ear was observed with dried blood behind it. On 10/17/24 at 3:00 p.m., the resident was observed in his room wearing oxygen via a nasal cannula. At that time, he was asked to pull back his right ear lobe so the area behind the ear could be viewed. The area behind the ear was open with both fresh and dried blood. The resident was asked to pull back his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure enteral tube feedings were infusing at the correct time through a peg tube (a tube inserted directly into the stomach for nutrition) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tube feeding. (Resident 113) Finding includes: On 10/18/24 at 9:37 a.m., Resident 113 was observed lying in bed with the head of the bed (HOB) elevated. The resident's tube feeding was running at 70 milliliter/hour (ml/hr). The tube feeding bottle was dated 10/17/24. Written on the front of the bottle with pen was a start time of 10:00 a.m., and an end time of 6:00 a.m. At 10:09 a.m., the tube feeding dated 10/17/24 was still running at 70 ml/hr. There was a new tube feeding bottle and tubing on the bedside table that was dated 10/18/24 and indicated a start time of 10:00 a.m. At 10:36 a.m., the tube feeding was shut off by QMA 1 for the resident's medication pass. At 10:47 a.m., the tube feeding bottle dated 10/18/24 was on and running at 70 ml/hr. During an interview at the time, QMA 1 indicated she had started the 10:00 a.m. tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was at the correct flow rate for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for oxygen. (Resident 120) Finding includes: On 10/15/24 at 10:34 a.m. and 3:11 p.m., Resident 120 was observed in his room in bed with oxygen by the way of a nasal cannula in use. The oxygen concentrator was set at 3 liters. On 10/16/24 at 11:18 a.m., the resident was observed in his room in bed. His oxygen was in use and the oxygen concentrator was set at 3 1/2 liters. At 3:59 p.m., the oxygen concentrator was set at below 4 liters. On 10/17/24 at 10:12 a.m., 11:35 a.m. and 2:14 p.m., the resident was observed in his room in bed. His oxygen was in use and the oxygen concentrator was set at 3 1/2 liters. The record for Resident 120 was reviewed on 10/18/24 at 9:30 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behavior disturbance, psychotic disorder with delusions, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and oxygen dependent. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/11/24, indicated the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure clinical records were complete and accurately documented related to medication orders for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tube feeding. (Residents 139 and 113) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 139 was reviewed on 10/21/24 at 9:28 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and depression. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/23/24, indicated the resident was mildly cognitively impaired and received anti-anxiety and antipsychotic medications. A Physician's Order, dated 4/2/24, indicated the resident was to receive ABH (Ativan/Benadryl/Haldol) gel (a hospice medication for agitation) to the wrist topically two times a day for agitation and aggressive behavior. There was no documented strength, dosage, or amount to give listed in the medication order. The Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 10/2024, indicated the resident had received the ABH gel medication twice a day. There…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident received the necessary treatment and services to promote healing for pressure ulcers, related to ensuring wound care orders were updated and implemented for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident D) Finding includes: Resident D's record was reviewed on 7/2/24 at 9:42 a.m. The resident was discharged to the hospital on 5/28/24. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and peripheral vascular disease. The Discharge Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 5/28/24, indicated the resident was independent for decision making. She had two stage 3 pressure ulcers and two stage 4 pressure ulcers. A Care Plan, dated 3/26/24, indicated the resident had ulcers to her right heel, bilateral buttocks, and coccyx. Interventions included, but were not limited to, administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. A Physician's Order, dated 4/11/24, indicated to cleanse right upper heel with normal saline and/or wound cleanser and apply…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure gastrostomy tube (peg tube, a tube inserted through the abdomen that allows nutrition to be delivered directly to the stomach) dietary recommendations were followed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for peg tubes. (Resident H) Finding includes: Resident H's record was reviewed on 7/3/24 at 10:04 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), presence of gastrostomy, and aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech). The Discharge Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 5/16/24, indicated the resident was severely impaired for daily decision making and had a feeding tube while a resident. A Care Plan, dated 3/26/24, indicated the resident required a tube feeding. Interventions included, but were not limited to, Registered Dietician (RD) to evaluate quarterly and as needed, monitor caloric intake, estimate needs, and make recommendations for changes to the tube feeding as needed. The resident was dependent with tube feedings and water flushes. A Physician's Order, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to properly prevent and /or contain COVID-19, related to lack of assessment and monitoring of COVID-19 positive residents, for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for infection control (Residents B, D and E). Findings include: 1. The record for Resident B was reviewed on 2/29/24 at 11:30 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Diabetes Mellitus and heart failure. The resident tested positive for COVID-19 on 1/30/24. A Physician's Order, dated 1/30/24, indicated the resident was to be placed on isolation for COVID-19 for 10 days. Health Status Notes, dated 2/1/24 and 2/6/24, indicated the resident was in isolation and noted with a cough. No shortness of breath or fever noted, vital signs were in normal limits. However there were no vital signs documented in the note. A Health Status Note, dated 2/3/24, indicated the resident was noted with some coughing and congestion. There were no Health Status Notes for 2/5, 2/7,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to serve food under sanitary conditions related to beverages being uncovered while being transported down the hallway for 1 of 1 meal observations. The facility also failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions related to dried spillage on the floor, walls, and door, and a build up of grease and grime on the food preparation equipment for 1 of 1 kitchens. (The Fourth Floor and the Main Kitchen) Findings include: 1. On 11/17/23 at 11:32 a.m., the beverage cart was delivered to the Fourth floor. At 11:50 a.m., a staff member was observed placing 10 styrofoam cups on the ledge of the nurses' station and filling them with juice. At 11:52 a.m., staff members were observed placing the uncovered cups on residents' lunch trays and walking down the hall. Interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 11/20/23 at 3:18 p.m., indicated the cups should have been covered. The facility policy titled In-Room Dining was provided by the ADON on 11/20/23 at 3:18 p.m. and identified as current. The policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's) related to nail care and shaving for 4 of 13 residents reviewed for ADL's. (Residents E, G, F, and B) Findings include: 1. On 11/15/23 at 10:15 a.m., Resident E was observed in their room in bed. A brown substance was observed underneath their fingernails on both hands. At 2:45 p.m., the resident was dressed and seated in his wheelchair in their room. The brown substance remained underneath their fingernails. On 11/16/23 at 9:22 a.m., 11:28 a.m., and 1:58 p.m., the brown substance remained underneath the resident's fingernails The record for Resident E was reviewed on 11/16/23 at 9:51 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, dementia with other behavior disturbance, major depressive disorder, and chronic kidney disease Stage 3. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/11/23, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making, required moderate assistance with personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure areas of bruising and scabbing were assessed and monitored and lotion was applied to dry scaly feet for 8 of 9 residents reviewed for skin conditions non-pressure related. The facility also failed to ensure residents were monitored for constipation for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for constipation. (Residents N, E, K, C, G, M, J, and H) Findings include: 1. On 11/15/23 at 10:26 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Resident N was observed in their room in bed. A fading purple bruise was observed on the top of their left hand. On 11/16/23 at 9:26 a.m. and 11:28 a.m., the bruising remained to the resident's left hand. The record for Resident N was reviewed on 11/16/23 at 2:23 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, palliative care, dementia with behavior disturbance, and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/15/23, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was clean and in good repair related to dirty floors, marred walls, loose baseboards, lime build up, missing tiles, and personal care items not contained for 4 of 5 floors throughout the facility. (The Second, Third, and Fourth floors) Findings include: During the Environmental tour with the Maintenance and Housekeeping Supervisors on 11/20/23 at 9:38 a.m., the following was observed: 1. Second Floor a. On 11/14/23 at 10:52 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed. The floor mats were dirty, there was an accumulation of food debris on the floor in between the beds, the raised toilet seat was cracked, and the corners of the bathroom floor were dirty. The resident was currently out on hospital leave. b. The bathroom faucet in room [ROOM NUMBER] had a heavy accumulation of lime build up. There was a missing ceramic wall tile next to the toilet, and the walls were marred in the room. One resident resided in the room and 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had Physician's Orders for medications and an assessment to self-administer their own medications for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for self-administration of medication. (Resident 146) Finding includes: On 11/16/23 at 3:10 p.m., Resident 146's room was observed. At that time, there was a box of Ivizia eye drops on the over bed table. The resident was not in her room. On 11/17/23 at 7:46 a.m., the resident was observed in bed eating breakfast. At that time, there was a box of Ivizia eye drops on the over bed table. The resident indicated she put the eye drops in her eyes when she needed them. The record for Resident 146 was reviewed on 11/16/23 at 1:25 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, acute kidney failure, repeated falls, and edema. The 9/6/23 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's vision was adequate with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to initiate Care Plans related to pressure ulcers and medication use for 2 of 33 residents whose Care Plans were reviewed. (Residents N and 12) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident N was reviewed on 11/16/23 at 2:23 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, palliative care, dementia with behavior disturbance, and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/15/23, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making. The resident required extensive assistance for bed mobility. The Wound Rounds Progress Notes indicated the resident had the following wounds present: - 10/30/23 Unstageable (full-thickness pressure injuries in which the base was obscured by slough and/or eschar) pressure ulcer to the right posterior upper thigh. - 10/31/23 Stage 2 (open wound) pressure ulcer to the left posterior upper thigh. - 11/10/23 Deep Tissue Injury (purple or maroon localized area of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an Optometrist's recommendation for eye drops was completed in a timely manner for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for communication and sensory. (Resident 146) Finding includes: During an interview on 11/14/23 at 2:49 p.m., Resident 146 indicated she had seen the eye doctor and thought new glasses were ordered, but she had not received them. The record for Resident 146 was reviewed on 11/16/23 at 1:25 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, acute kidney failure, repeated falls, and edema. The 9/6/23 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's vision was adequate with corrective lens. She had no oral problems, weighed 122 pounds, and has had a significant weight loss. The resident received dialysis as a resident. An Optometry Progress Note, dated 4/13/23, indicated the resident had mild dry eyes for both eyes. Recommend a new medication order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcers were covered securely with a bandage as ordered by the Physician and treatment orders were obtained timely for new pressure sores for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Residents G and J) Findings include: 1. On 11/14/23 at 1:52 p.m., Resident G was observed in bed. At that time, their feet were observed laying directly on the mattress and not suspended or offloaded. The top right foot was observed with bloody scabs and the foot was bright red. There was no dressing observed. On 11/15/23 at 10:48 a.m., and 3:15 p.m., and 11/16/23 at 9:15 a.m., 1:50 p.m., the resident was observed in bed. At those times, their feet were observed laying directly on the mattress and not suspended or offloaded. The top right foot was observed with bloody scabs and the foot was bright red. On 11/17/23 at 8:04 a.m., the resident was observed in bed and their feet were laying directly on the mattress and not suspended or offloaded. There was a white bandage observed to the right foot dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received foot care and had routine visits with a podiatrist related to long and thick toenails for 1 of 11 residents reviewed for ADL's. (Resident G) Finding includes: On 11/14/23 1:52 p.m., on 11/15/23 at 10:48 a.m. and 3:15 p.m., on 11/16/23 at 9:15 a.m. and 1:50 p.m., and on 11/17/23 at 8:04 a.m. and 9:33 a.m., Resident G was observed in bed. At those times the resident had long thick toenails with dry scaly skin on both feet. The record for Resident G was reviewed on 11/15/23 at 3:32 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, multiple sclerosis, vascular dementia, major depressive disorder, mood disorder, paraplegia, hammer toes for left and right feet, right foot deformity, pain in the toes, fecal impaction, constipation, and anxiety. The 9/14/23 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated the resident was severely impaired for decision making and had short and long term memory problems. The resident needed extensive assist with 2 person physical assist for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a suprapubic foley (urinary) catheter bag not on the floor and catheter care was completed as ordered by the Physician for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for catheters. (Resident 12) Finding includes: On 11/14/23 at 11:09 a.m. and 2:47 p.m., and on 11/16/23 at 9:25 a.m. and 10:15 a.m., Resident 12 was observed in bed. At those times, the foley catheter was hanging on the side of the bed, however, the bag was touching the floor. On 11/16/23 at 11:30 a.m., the resident was observed in bed. CNA 1 was asked to remove his brief to observe the stoma site of the supra pubic catheter. The area around the catheter was dark brown and crusted over. The catheter bag was observed resting on the floor. On 11/17/23 at 7:45 a.m. and 8:26 a.m., the resident was observed in bed. At that time, the foley catheter bag was observed on floor. On 11/17/23 at 8:43 a.m., RN was asked to observe the resident's supra pubic ostomy site. The RN removed the brief and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was at the correct flow rate for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen. (Resident M) Finding includes: During an interview with Resident M on 11/14/23 at 11:48 a.m., the resident indicated they wore oxygen all the time. The oxygen flow rate was set at 2.5 liters per minute. On 11/15/23 at 10:09 a.m., and 2:30 p.m., the resident was observed wearing oxygen via nasal cannula. The oxygen flow rate was set at 3 liters per minute. The record for Resident M was reviewed on 11/16/23 at 11:03 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), anemia, chronic respiratory failure, major depressive disorder, high blood pressure, anxiety, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. The 9/29/23 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident received oxygen as a resident and in the last 7 days she received an anticoagulant medication 7 times. A Care Plan, revised on 10/23/23, indicated the resident had oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dialysis resident received the correct nutritional supplement for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dialysis. (Resident 146) Finding includes: During random observations on 11/14/23 at 2:50 p.m., 11/15/23 at 2:30 p.m., and 11/16/23 at 3:10 p.m., there was a container of Boost nutritional supplement on Resident 146's over bed table. Interview with the resident on 11/14/23 at 2:50 p.m., indicated she goes to dialysis on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. The Boost supplement was given to her from the nursing staff at the facility. She indicated she gets them two times a day. On 11/17/23 at 7:46 a.m., the resident was observed eating breakfast. At that time, there were 2 containers of the Boost nutritional supplement on her over bed table. The record for Resident 146 was reviewed on 11/16/23 at 1:25 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, acute kidney failure, repeated falls, and edema.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to manage medications appropriately related holding blood pressure medications on dialysis days and checking blood pressure and pulse prior to the administration of blood pressure medications with Physician ordered parameters for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 146) Finding includes: The record for Resident 146 was reviewed on 11/16/23 at 1:25 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, acute kidney failure, repeated falls, and edema. The 9/6/23 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's vision was adequate with corrective lens. She had no oral problems, weighed 122 pounds, and has had a significant weight loss. The resident received dialysis as a resident. The Care Plan, revised on 10/27/23, indicated the resident required dialysis related to renal failure. Physician's Orders, dated 8/29/23, indicated dialysis every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was an indication for the use of a psychotropic medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 23) Finding includes: The record for Resident 23 was reviewed on 11/16/23 at 11:00 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, high blood pressure, anemia, dementia, anxiety, behavior disturbance, insomnia and depression. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/28/23, indicated the resident was severely impaired for decision making. In the last 7 days the resident had received an antidepressant and an antipsychotic medication. A Care Plan, dated 9/28/23, indicated the resident displayed physical behavioral symptoms related to hitting a peer. Interventions included, but were not limited to, refer to psychologist/psychiatrist for behavior management as needed. A Physician's Order, dated 5/15/23, indicated for Olanzapine (antipsychotic medication) 5 milligrams(mg) be administered at bedtime related to dementia. A Nurse's Note, dated 11/3/23 at 8:18 a.m., indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-16 for 27 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SEFLERS, LEEIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2014
HORNER, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$20.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+11.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.6M
Related-party expense20% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 14%Other / private 14%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$295per resident / day
operating cost
$8,964per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$333per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155131. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next