No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Majestic Care Of Newburgh

5233 Rosebud Lane, Newburgh, IN 47630 · For profit - Corporation · 104 certified beds · (812) 473-4761 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (812) 473-4761 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
10466 Pollack Ave · (812) 853-2931 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4209 Gateway Blvd · (812) 450-3784 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6401 E Lloyd Expy · (812) 402-5361 · Call to confirm hours
Park
· Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
8419 Newburgh Rd · (812) 473-4700

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.3%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.7%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms29.3%25.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.5%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.2%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication30.1%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.3%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.5%23.3%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.6%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine70.2%79.0%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.5%22.2%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.2%10.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.771.611.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.421.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

39.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
22.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 22.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF39.4%CMS range 28.6–54.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.6–15.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge22.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge22.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge13.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.1–15.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.50
RN hours/ resident / day
0.69
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.15
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.33
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.34
RN hoursweekends
61.1%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 92.0 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-03)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-09)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-05-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the failed to ensure a resident who entered the facility with an indwelling urinary catheter was effectively assessed for adverse outcomes of an indwelling urinary catheter, received treatment and services to prevent infection in accordance with the physician orders and the plan of care, or was effectively monitored for complications of bloody urine after the catheter was suspected to be pulled for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 35 being hospitalized for the treatment of urethral obstruction and sepsis. (Resident 35) Finding includes: On 5/2/24 at 9:30 A.M., a family member indicated Resident 35 had been admitted to the hospital with sepsis due to a UTI (urinary tract infection). The family member indicated she told the facility there was blood in the tubing and bag on 4/17/24 and staff told her they did not change catheters anymore. On 5/3/24 at 8:44 A.M., Resident 35's clinical record was reviewed. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physicians' orders were followed for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for medications. Medications were observed at a resident's bedside table; the medication was held without a physician's order. ( Resident B, Resident D) Findings include:On 7/30/25 at 9:44 a.m., a medication cup with pills inside was observed sitting on Resident B's bedside table. Resident B indicated she does not take her medications until she eats her breakfast. On 7/30/25 at 10:36 a.m., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertensive heart disease and chronic kidney disease with heart failure and stage 1 through stage 4 chronic kidney disease, or unspecified chronic kidney disease, Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated cognition intact.Care plans were reviewed and included, but were not limited to: [Resident B] is at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher was sanitizing dishes properly and staff knew how to properly test for sanitization for 1 of 1 kitchens in the facility. (Kitchen) Finding includes: During an observation on 6/29/25 at 8:15 A.M., the Kitchen Manager ran a dishwasher cycle. The wash cycle reached 155 degrees Fahrenheit (F), the rinse cycle reached 138 degrees F, and the sanitization level on the chlorine test strips read zero parts per million (ppm). The Kitchen Manager indicated the dishwasher was a low temperature dishwasher and the dishwasher sanitization had been testing fine the night before. Kitchen staff continued to put dishes through the dishwasher. During an observation on 6/29/25 at 12:58 P.M., staff members were observed serving lunch on dishes ran through the dishwasher. During an interview on 6/29/25 at 2:15 P.M., the Administrator indicated when the dishwasher was not working properly, staff should be hand washing dishes in the three-compartment sink or using disposable dishes to serve meals on. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) tasks were provided showers or baths for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Resident 27, Resident 97, Resident 11, and Resident 36) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 6/29/25 at 9:37 A.M., Resident 27 indicated he hadn't had any baths lately. Resident 27 had a strong, pungent smell surrounding him. On 6/30/25 at 10:06 A.M., Resident 27's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus. The most recent Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 5/28/25, indicated Resident 27 was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for toileting, bathing, and transfers. The Point of Care (a charting system for Certified Nurse Aides) Task Response indicated Resident 27's scheduled shower days were Tuesday and Friday. The Point of Care ADL report and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and labeled for 4 of 5 medication carts reviewed and 1 treatment cart reviewed. (100 Hall Cart 1, 100 Hall Cart 2, 200 Hall Cart 1, 200 Hall Cart 2, 100 Hall Treatment Cart) Findings include: 1. On 6/29/25 at 8:00 A.M., the following loose pills and liquid medications were observed in 100 Hall Cart 1: 1 oblong white pill with numbers 1222 1 round white pill with the letter AM and numbers 520 1 blue oblong pill with letter ARI and number 5 1 small round peach pill 1 small round white pills with the number 15 1 large brown capsule 1 round white pill with the number 745 1 oval white pill with the number 22 1 small round white pill 1/2 small round white pill 1 small round peach pill 1 large white pill- Potassium 1 small white pill with letter A 1/2 oblong lavender pill 1 small white pill with the number 122 1 blue-green oblong with the number 54 1 large white pill 3 containers of Clearlax with no open…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention practices were implemented during laundry services during 1 of 1 observations of laundry services. (Laundry Room) Finding includes: During an observation on 7/1/25 at 11:12 A.M., the Corporate Manager emptied the washer without wearing an apron and items in the washer were placed against her shirt and top of pants as well as her arms. During an interview on 7/3/25 at 9:22 A.M., the Director of Nursing indicated that when staff transferred clean laundry they should ensure laundry was not touching their uniforms. On 7/3/25 at 10:04 A.M., the Administrator provided a policy titled Personal Laundry Handling and Processing, dated 1/25, that indicated Items should be moved from the washer to the dryer as promptly as is practicable in a manner that minimized the risk of contamination and/or re-soiling. 3.1-18(b)(1)

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0659 — isolated
    Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) medications administered by a Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) were preauthorized by a licensed nurse for 2 of 5 resident reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 66 and Resident 87) Findings include: 1. On 6/30/25 at 11:09 A.M., Resident 66's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 5/15/25, indicated Resident 66 was cognitively intact and required setup assistance for eating. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: ondansetron (an antinausea medication) 4 milligrams (mg) - Give one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed (PRN) for nausea and vomiting, dated 2/19/25 Resident 66's Medication Administration Record (MAR) from 5/1/25 through 6/30/25 included, but was not limited to, the following dates that ondansetron 4 mg PRN was administered by a QMA without authorization from a licensed nurse: 5/10/25 at 11:33 A.M. given by QMA 15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care according to professional standards of a gastro/jejunal feeding tube (G-Tube) in 1 of 1 residents reviewed for tube feeding. The resident was not checked for residual as ordered prior to feedings. (Resident 44) Finding includes: On 6/30/25 at 11:15 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 17 was observed administering a feeding to Resident 44 via his G-Tube. LPN 17 did not check for residual prior to the administration. On 6/30/25 at 10:00 A.M., Resident 44's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, tracheostomy, neoplasm of larynx, and dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase. The current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 5/12/25, indicated Resident 44 was cognitively intact. The resident had a feeding tube, and needed supervision of staff for hygiene, dressing, and transferring Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Enteral feed, five times a day, administer 250 milliliters (ml), TwoCal HN 2.0 (a nutritionally complete, high-calorie…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper airway management for 1 of 1 residents reviewed with a laryngectomy. A self-assessment for care was not performed, documentation was not accurate, and the facility did not have the correct parts for the laryngectomy tube ([NAME] Tube). (Resident 44) Finding includes: On 6/29/29/25 at 11:00 A.M., Resident 44's [NAME] Tube was observed laying on the resident's bed. The resident realized it was out and the resident placed it back into the laryngectomy stoma (surgical incision and removal of the larynx). On 6/30/25 at 10:00 A.M., Resident 44's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, tracheostomy, neoplasm of the larynx, esophageal fistula post tracheostomy, and absence of the larynx. The current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 5/12/25, indicated Resident 44 was cognitively impaired. Resident 44 had a laryngectomy, had a g-tube for tube feeding, and needed supervision with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. On 6/30/25 at 8:11 A.M., Resident 98's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 98 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 3/22/25, indicated Resident 98 was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff (staff does all of the effort) for toileting, bathing, and transfers. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Metoprolol 50 milligrams (mg) Extended Release (ER) - Give one tablet by mouth one time a day; Start Date 9/1/21. Care plans included, but were not limited to: (Resident) is at risk for impaired cardiac output; Observe for signs/symptoms of cardiac dysfunction such as .increased or decreased heart rate or blood pressure. Document abnormal findings and notify physician. Date Initiated: 9/29/21 The electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) on 4/13/25 indicated Resident 98 had an abnormal low blood pressure of 68/53 and an abnormal high heart rate of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0659 — isolated
    Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. A resident was given a straw to drink with, and hand splints were not applied. (Resident B) Findings include: On 7/15/24 at 10:30 a.m., an observation of wound dressing changes were observed for Resident B. Resident B's hand's were contracted, no hand splints were observed on. A sign was observed above the bed indicating no straws to be used. On 7/15/24 at 10:53 a.m., observation of morning care was observed on Resident B, no hand splints were applied. On 7/15/24 at 1:18 p.m., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, unspecified osteoarthritis unspecified site. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident B's cognition was intact, functional limitations in range of motion, upper and lower extremities, impairment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, and served in a sanitary manner for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. The kitchen floors had debris build up, and equipment was soiled. ( Kitchen) Findings include: On 7/15/24 at 8:55 a.m., the kitchen was observed to have the following: 1. Floor debris build up, including along the edges of the the walls, under storage racks and tables, behind the stove, and warmers, under the dish machine, three compartment sink, under the steam table. The dry pantry floor had debris build up on floors, under racks, condiment packets observed on the floor and under the food racks. 2. Debris build up on the sides of the stove, the shelf above the stove, shelves on the stainless steel table the steamer was sitting on, top of steamer. The same was observed on 7/16/24 at 11:40 a.m. On 7/16/24 at 2:00 p.m., kitchen cleaning schedules were reviewed and included, but were not limited to: AM cook: 3 compartment sink- please clean outside and the floor underneath. AM cook : stove top & stove- clean stove top,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was served at an appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 trays tested for temperature. (Resident 21, Resident 246, Resident 74, Resident 73, Resident 87, Resident 4, Resident 24, Resident 55, Resident 25) Finding includes: On 4/30/24 at 9:33 A.M., Resident 21 indicated the food was cold. On 4/30/24 at 9:59 A.M., Resident 246 indicated the food was cold. On 4/30/24 at 10:10 A.M., Resident 74 indicated the food was tough, overcooked, and cold. On 4/30/24 at 10:44 A.M., Resident 73 indicated the food was cold. On 4/30/24 at 12:40 P.M., Resident 87 indicated the food tasted cold. On 4/30/24 at 12:58 P.M., Resident 4 indicated the food was hard and cold. On 4/30/24 at 1:23 P.M., Resident 24 indicated the food was warm or cold. On 5/1/24 at 8:35 A.M., Resident 55 indicated the food was always cold. On 5/1/24 at 8:46 A.M., Resident 25 indicated the food was burnt and cold. On 5/2/24 at 1:06 P.M., a test tray was obtained. Food temperatures for that meal were: - Baked chicken 100 degrees F (Fahrenheit) -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions during 4 of 4 kitchen observations and 1 of 1 nutrition pantry observation. Food was not labeled, left open to air, and expired food was not disposed of from the refrigerator, hair nets were not worn, and hand hygiene was not completed. (Kitchen, 100 hall nutrition pantry, Dietary Aide 3, Dietary Aide 21, Dietary Manager) Findings include: 1. On 4/29/24 at 8:29 A.M., during the full kitchen tour with Dietary Aide 3 the following was: - Dirt, food debris, a rag, and an ice scoop were on the floor under the dishwasher. Food debris was on the clean side of the dishwasher. - Liquid was on the floor by the juice cart. - In the freezer, Marzetti frozen pasta and beef patties were open to air. - In the walk-in refrigerator, the following items were observed: shredded mozzarella cheese - no label/date small cup white liquid - no label/date bologna - no label/date yogurt - lid not closed and no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify the resident's family of a resident to resident altercation for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for notification of changes. (Resident 35) Finding includes: On 5/2/24 at 9:30 A.M., a family member indicated a previous roommate attacked Resident 35 with a walker and a drawer in February, and the facility did not contact her until 11:00 A.M. the next morning. On 5/3/24 at 8:44 A.M., Resident 35's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and major depressive disorder. The most recent Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/23/24, indicated Resident 35 had severe cognitive impairment and had no behaviors during the assessment period. A late entry Social Services Note, dated 2/27/24 at 11:01 A.M., indicated that on the previous evening (2/26/24), Resident 35 was asleep in his bed when his roommate threw a walker and drawer from the nightstand at him resulting in bruising to Resident 35's hand. An Incident Note, dated 2/27/24 at 11:07 A.M., indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record and interview the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment was completed accurately for 3 of 19 residents reviewed. Antipsychotic medications, dental status, and significant weight loss were coded inaccurately. (Resident 25, Resident 246, Resident 55) Findings include: 1. On 5/1/24 at 10:00 A.M., Resident 25's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, were not limited to, Parkinson's Disease, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. The current Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 3/4/24, indicated Resident 25 was cognitively intact and did not receive an antipsychotic medication during the seven day look back period. The current Physician Orders included but were not limited to: Aripiprazole (antipsychotic medication) 2 mg (Milligrams), give 2 mg by mouth at bedtime related to unspecified mood disorder, dated 12/6/23. On 5/3/24 at 2:58 P.M., the Social Worker indicated there was a mistake on the MDS assessment. Resident 25 was on an antipsychotic for seven days during the assessment and was coded as not taking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility, failed to ensure care plan interventions were implemented for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls. The call light was not within reach. (Resident 26) Findings include On 5/1/24 at 8:50 A.M., Resident 26 was observed sitting in a chair with the call light wrapped around the call light monitor and not within reach of the resident. On 5/6/24 at 10:05 A.M., Resident 26 was observed sitting in a recliner with the call light lying across the bed not within reach of the resident. On 5/6/24 at 9:00 A.M., Resident 26's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease with late onset, dementia, and generalized anxiety disorder. The current Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 3/6/24, indicated Resident 26 was moderately cognitively impaired, needed substantial to maximum assistance for mobility, transfer, and eating, and was a fall risk. Care plan interventions for fall risk included but were not limited to call light and personal items within reach, assisting with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility, failed to ensure that documentation of interventions were not revised for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident 56) Findings include: On 4/29/24 at 11:05 A.M., Resident 56 was observed wearing a cast on her left arm. On 5/3/24 at 1:55 P.M., Resident 56's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia, aphasia following cerebral infarction, unspecified fracture of the lower end of right radius, and nondisplaced fracture of right ulna styloid process. The most current Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 4/17/24, indicated Resident 56 had moderate cognitive impairment, was independent in sit to stand transfers and toileting, did not use any mobility devices, and had 1 fall with major injury since the prior assessment on 2/16/24. A current falls care plan, revised 2/4/23, indicated Resident 56 was at risk for falls or fall related injury due to a history of CVA (cerebrovascular accident), diabetes, decreased vision, and neuropathy. An Event Note, dated 4/12/24 at 11:25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was given according to physician orders for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A blood pressure medication was given outside of parameters and glucagon was administered without an order. (Resident 246) Finding includes: On 5/2/24 at 9:35 A.M., Resident 246's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypotension, type 1 diabetes mellitus, and disease of the pancreas. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/29/24, indicated Resident 246 was cognitively intact, required setup assistance for eating, and received a hypoglycemic medication during the 7-day look back period. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Midodrine (a medication to treat low pressure) HCl Oral Tablet 5 MG (milligrams) - Give 3 tablets by mouth three times a day for hypotension hold if SBP (systolic blood pressure) more than 110, dated 4/24/24. Baqsimi (a medication used to treat low blood sugar) One Pack 3 MG/DOSE (milligrams per dose) Powder -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nutritional care and services including the failure to obtain weekly weights, failure to provide assistance with meals and alternative food/supplement choices, and failure to notify the physician and address the resident's refusal of nutritional supplements and poor intakes resulting in a significant weight loss of 18.37% in less than 30 days 1 of 3 residents reviewed for significant weight loss and ensure a resident was receiving adequate fluids resulting in dehydration and a urinary tract infection 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dehydration. (Resident 55 and Resident 75) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 5/1/24 at 8:25 A.M., a family member expressed concern Resident 55 was not receiving all of her meals, that staff would sometimes bring Resident 55's tray in to her room and place it on her bedside table and come back and collect the tray without assisting her to eat, and that family would travel from hours away to come sit with her multiple days in a row each week to ensure she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was labeled and oxygen administration signs were in place for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen administration. (Resident 24, Resident 73, Resident 88) Findings include: 1. On 4/30/24 at 9:05 A.M., Resident 24's was observed wearing O2 (oxygen) via a cannula in bed alongside of a CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) machine at the bedside with tubing that lacked a date and initials when changed. There were no oxygen administration warning signs on the outside door frame. On 5/3/24 at 1:28 P.M., Resident 24 was observed wearing O2 via cannula while sitting in a chair and the CPAP machine sitting on a bedside table, the tubing lacked a date and initials when changed. There were no oxygen administration warning signs on the outside door frame. On 5/3/24 at 12:08 P.M., Resident 24's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), heart failure, and anxiety. The current admission MDS (Minimum Data Set)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pain assessments and provide pain management in accordance with the resident's comprehensive care plan for 1 of 1 residents reviewed pain. (Resident 55) Findings include: During an observation on 4/30/24 at 3:50 P.M., Resident 55 was observed in bed and appeared to be restless, moaning, and crying out in pain. On 5/1/24 at 8:34 A.M., Resident 55's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 55's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and low back pain. Resident 55's most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 3/7/24, indicated severe cognitive impairment and was not experiencing pain during the pain assessment. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Tylenol (acetaminophen pain relief) extra strength oral tablet 500 MG (milligrams). Give two tablet by mouth, two times a day for pain, start date 12/29/23 Celecoxib (anti-inflammatory medication) oral capsule 200 MG. Give one capsule by mouth one time a day for pain, start…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0729 — isolated
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure CNA's had a current and valid certificate to work in the facility for 1 of 27 CNA's reviewed. (CNA 2) Finding includes: On [DATE] at 2:09 P.M., the employee records were reviewed. CNA 2's CNA certificate expired on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 3:25 P.M., the Administrator indicated Human Resources (HR) was responsible for making sure licenses stayed current and that they were working to get CNA 2's certificate renewed. On [DATE] at 12:23 P.M., the dates CNA 2 worked as a CNA were provided by the Infection Preventionist (IP). CNA 2 worked as a CNA on 10 shifts from [DATE] to [DATE]. On [DATE] at 11:07 A.M., the IP provided a current Licensed Health Professional Check policy, revised [DATE], that indicated If an existing Care Member's license is not renewed prior to the expiration date, the licensed Care Team Member will be placed in a non-certified position or removed from the schedule until the license has been renewed and the Human Resources Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate greater than 5% for 2 of 26 opportunities observed to administer medications, resulting in an error rate of 7.7%. (Residents 7, Resident 15) Findings include: 1. During a medication administration observation on 5/2/24 at 7:09 A.M., QMA 9 prepared medications for Resident 15. QMA 9 measured 17g (Grams) of Miralax powder and mixed it in water, and prepared the following oral medications: Furosemide (high blood pressure medication) 40mg (milligrams) Potassium chloride (potassium supplement) 10 mEq (milliequivelant) Sodium chloride (sodium supplement) 1gm (Gram) Thiamine (Vitamin) 100 mg Galantimine (dementia medication) 8 mg Senna (constipation medication) 8.6-50 mg Carbidopa-Levodopa (Parkinson's Medication) 25-100 mg Depakote (Seizure Medication) Sprinkles 125 mg capsules Levetiracetam (Seizure medication) 5 ml (milliliter) solution into a separate medication cup. QMA 9 then crushed all pills together, opened four Depakote capsules and emptied the sprinkles…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure deteriorated medications were discarded for 1 of 3 medication carts observed. (100 Hall Cart 1) Findings include: During a medication storage observation, of the 100 Hall Cart 1 on 5/8/24 at 9:05 A.M., the following loose and unlabeled medications were observed: one tan round pill with no imprints one light blue round pill with imprints SG 45 three white round pills with imprints C 73 two white oval pills with imprints ZF 41 one pink round pill with imprints lupin 10 one half semi-round white pill with no imprints one white round pill with imprints SC one pink round pill with imprints 201 LS one green round pill with imprints HH 974 one clear capsule filled with tan powder one red round pill with no imprints one white oval pill with imprints 11 A one white round pill with imprints GG 26 During an interview on 5/8/24 at 9:12 A.M., LPN 8 stated loose pills in the medication cart should be disposed of, then disposed of all 16 medications into the sharps container on the side of the medication cart. On 5/9/24 at 9:56 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food to accommodate a resident's food allergy for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for nutrition. Milk was given with a meal to a resident who had a lactose allergy. (Resident 246) Finding includes: On 4/20/24 at 9:59 A.M., a family member indicated Resident 246 got milk on his meal trays and he was lactose intolerant. At that time, milk in an unopened carton was observed on the resident's breakfast tray. On 5/2/24 at 9:35 A.M., Resident 246's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, intestinal malabsorption and gastroparesis. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/29/24, indicated Resident 246 was cognitively intact and required setup assistance for eating. An allergy list included lactose intolerance (gastrointestinal issues), dated 10/5/23. An admission Nutrition Assessment, dated 9/19/23, indicated Resident 246 had a food allergy to milk and cheese which resulted in an upset stomach. A nutrition care plan, initiated 9/5/23, included an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, 1 of 3 residents observed for medication administration, and 1 of 2 residents reviewed falls. (Resident 246, Resident 15, Resident 26) Finding includes: 1. On 4/30/24 at 10:00 A.M., a family member indicated Resident 246 received insulin. On 5/2/24 at 9:35 A.M., Resident 246's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 1 diabetes mellitus, intestinal malabsorption, and generalized anxiety disorder. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/29/24, indicated Resident 246 was cognitively intact and received insulin 7 days during the 7-day lookback period. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Insulin Lispro Injection Solution (a fast-acting hypoglycemic medication) 100 UNIT/ML (units per milliliter) - Inject as per sliding scale: if 0 - 150 = 0 units; 210 - 265 = 1 units; 266 - 320 = 2 units; 321 - 375 = 3 units; 376 - 430 = 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented for 2 of 2 residents observed for wound care. Hand hygiene and glove changes were not completed. (Resident 12, Resident 11, LPN 8, CNA 7, RN 7, Nurse Practitioner 19) Findings include: 1. On 5/3/24 at 9:19 A.M., wound care was observed on Resident 12 by LPN 8 and CNA 7. During wound care the resident was observed to have a bowel movement. LPN 8 had gloves on, turned the resident on left side, cleaned buttocks with wipes, and proceeded to touch the resident without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene. The resident was then turned to the right side by gloved CNA 7, soiled dressing removed, peri care completed, and dirty linen was removed. CNA removed gloves but did not perform hand hygiene before placing new gloves on. The resident again turned to the left side so that LPN 7 could complete wound care to the sacral wound. LPN 7 proceeded to touch clean linen with the same gloved hands without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene. 2. On 5/2/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents fall interventions were in place to prevent a fall for 1 of 3 resident reviewed for falls. ( Resident E) Finding includes: On 2/2/24 at 9:05 a.m., Resident E was observed in his room in bed eating breakfast. Resident E indicated he had no concerns with his care except sometimes when he wants up for the day it takes staff awhile to come help him. Resident E indicated he feels he is independent and tried to get up and fell recently. Resident E's electric wheelchair was observed in his room in the vicinity of his bed. On 2/2/24 at 9:13 a.m., Resident E's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified sequel of cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 11/23/23 indicated Resident E's cognition was intact, limited range of motion impairment upper and lower one side, mobility device electric wheelchair, bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, and served in a sanitary manner for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. The kitchen floors had debris build up, equipment was soiled, and food was open to air and undated. ( Kitchen) Finding includes: On 2/1/24 at 8:19 a.m., the kitchen was observed to have the following: 1. Floor debris build up, including along the edges of the the walls, under storage racks, behind the stove, and warmers, under the dish machine, the area where cleaning supplies and mops were stored. 2. In the walk in cooler a partially used open log of ground hamburger wrapped in foil, a plastic bag with part of a cucumber, plastic bag with sliced tomatoes, were observed with no dates. 3. In the walk in freezer a bag of chicken tenders, bag of hashbrowns, bag of ravioli, were open to air and undated. A bag of hamburger patties were undated. 4. The top of ovens soiled. On 2/1/24 at 11:37 a.m., the same was observed except the bag of hamburger patties were gone. On 2/2/24 at 11:45 a.m., the Dietary Manager indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0659 — isolated
    Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. The correct dose of a resident's pain medication was not given. (Resident B) Finding includes: On [DATE] at 9:54 a.m., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cluster headache syndrome, unspecified, intractable, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, epilepsy intractable, without status epilepticus. An admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident B's cognition was intact, pain frequency almost constantly, effects sleep and activities, pain 8 on scale. Resident B admitted to the facility on [DATE] and expired at the facility on [DATE]. Care plans were reviewed and included, but were not limited to: [name] is at risk for pain due to encephalopathy, left hemiplegia, epilepsy, chronic headaches. Interventions included, but were not limited to: Administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appetizing and palatable meals for 1 of 1 lunch trays sampled on 1 of 2 halls. Residents complained of cold food temperatures at meals and distasteful food during meals. (100 Hall, Resident B, Resident J) Finding includes: 1. During a review of facility grievances on 12/1/23 at 10:00 A.M., a concern was reported to the facility, dated 8/3/23, by Resident B that all food was distasteful. During a review of Resident Council minutes on 12/1/23 at 10:15 A.M., Resident Council concerns from meeting notes dated 9/26/23, included but were not limited to, potatoes of all kinds are never done all the way and that the bread was soggy. During an interview on 12/1/23 at 1:00 P.M., Resident J indicated that the food was not good and that it was delivered hot only some of the time. Resident J indicated that he ate both in his room and in the dining room. 2. During an observation on 12/4/23 at 12:05 P.M., staff were passing trays to the 100 Hall. A sample tray was removed from the hall cart and tempted at 12:10 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure quarterly care conferences for the Minimum Data Set Assessment were completed for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for care conferences. (Resident B, Resident E) Finding includes: On 8/16/23 at 10:22 a.m., Resident B indicated it had been months since they or their representative had been invited or attended a care conference. On 8/18/23 at 12:53 p.m., Resident E indicated they thought they had been invited to a care conference before, but not sure when. On 8/17/23 at 10:11 a.m., the Social Services Director indicated it looked like the last care conference for Resident B was on 3/30/23, the next one due had been missed. On 8/18/23 at 12:49 p.m., the Social Service Director indicated Resident E had a care conference on 10/11/23, 5/18/23, and 7/28/23, Resident E had a hospital stay in November and December 2022. The Social Service Director indicated the next care conference due after the October 2022 conference would have been in March of 2023, it had been missed, care conferences were done by the MDS (Minimum Data Set)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 breakfast trays sampled. Finding included: During the survey from 8/3/22 to 8/11/22 the following random resident interviews were completed: The food is not good. The food is cold. The food is cold and too salty. On 8/5/22 at 7:40 A.M., a breakfast tray was obtained with the following temperatures and tastes: sausage 108 degrees Fahrenheit, taste was cold, sausage was pink in the middle. waffle 110 degrees Fahrenheit, taste was cold. oatmeal 153 degrees Fahrenheit, taste was bland. On 8/11/22 at 8:35 A.M., a current Food Production policy, dated March 2019, was obtained and indicated the sausage should be 155 degrees Fahrenheit for .sausage . This Federal tag relates to Complaint IN00387611. 3.1-21(a)(1) 3.1-21(a)(2)

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for 4 of 6 residents during observation of perineal care, medication administration, placement for Foley catheter bag and 1 of 1 resident receiving a Covid 19 test. Gloves were not changed between dirty and clean tasks during peri care, staff was observed not wearing a mask with a resident present, a medication was picked up from the top of a medication cart with bare hands and given to a resident, and Foley catheter bag and tubing was touching the floor. (Resident 156, Resident 221, Resident 226, Resident 122, Resident 229, Resident 2) Findings include: 1. On 8/9/22 at 10:04 A.M., CNA (certified nurse aide) 25 was observed performing incontinence care for Resident 156. Prior to beginning, CNA 25 put on a pair of gloves. After removing the visibly soiled brief, CNA 25 cleaned the resident with several wipes, and placed all dirty items in a trash bag. CNA 25 then put a clean incontinence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident in order to meet medical needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. Staff did not implement care plan interventions, or follow MD orders for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for implementation of the care plan intervention for respiratory care, urinary care, and weight management while on enteral feedings. (Resident G, Resident 10, Resident 44) Findings include: 1. On 8/8/22 at 9:03 A.M., Resident G's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). The most recent quarterly MDS (minimum data set) Assessment, dated 7/22/22, indicated Resident G had a significant cognitive impairment, and required extensive assistance of 2 (two) staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Current physical orders included, but were not limited to: Elevate head of bed to alleviate shortness of breath…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and prevent falls for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. Fall interventions were not in place for residents with multiple falls. (Resident 25, Resident 9) Findings include: 1. On 8/8/22 at 8:46 A.M., Resident 25's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, epilepsy, anxiety disorder, history of falling, and Alzheimer's disease. The most recent significant change MDS (minimum data set) Assessment, dated 5/12/22, indicated Resident 25 had a severe cognitive impairment, and required extensive assistance of 2 (two) staff with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting, extensive assistance of 1 (one) staff with eating, and was totally dependent on 1 (one) staff for bathing. Resident 25's care plan included, but were not limited to, [Resident] at risk for falls r/t [related to] History of falls, Poor safety awareness, Incontinence, dated 3/21/17 and revised 4/21/22. Interventions included, but were not limited to, Placed sign in room to Call for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who experienced weight loss had new interventions instituted and that the registered dietitian and the physician were notified of a significant weight loss for 1 of 3 reviewed for nutrition. (Resident G) Findings include: On 8/4/22 at 8:55 A.M., Resident G was observed lying asleep in bed. A tray with a full plate of food including scrambled eggs and juice was observed sitting on a bedside table in front of her, untouched. The tray lacked a supplemental drink. On 8/4/22 at 9:28 A.M., CNA (certified nurse aide) 5 was observed to enter Resident G's room, walked past Resident G, and handed the roommate a cup of water. CNA 5 then exited the room without addressing Resident G. At that time, the plate in front of Resident G was still untouched, and Resident G was still asleep. During an interview on 8/4/22 at 9:36 A.M., CNA 3 indicated the breakfast trays had been passed that morning between 7:30 and 8:00 A.M. At that time, Resident G's plate was still untouched. On 8/8/22 at 9:03 A.M., Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A GDR (gradual dose reduction) was not completed to reduce a psychotropic medication. A resident's as needed anti-anxiety medication was ordered for greater than 14 days. (Resident 32, Resident 55) Finding includes: 1. On 8/8/22 at 10:41 A.M., Resident 55's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, Non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder, and depression. The most recent significant change MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 7/2/22, indicated Resident 55's cognition was moderately impaired and was currently on hospice. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to, Ativan Tablet 0.5MG (LORazepam) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for anxiety related to ANXIETY DISORDER, UNSPECIFIED dated 5/30/22. Resident 55's clinical record lacked any physician assessments for lorazepam…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2025-07-03 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post a current Posted Nurse Staffing sheet for 1 of 5 days during the survey period. Finding includes: On 6/29/25 at 8:05 A.M., a Posted Nurse Staffing sheet was observed next to the reception window in the main lobby. It was dated 6/27/25. During an interview on 7/2/25 at 1:54 A.M., the Administrator indicated the scheduler filled out the Posted Nurse Staffing sheets. When the scheduler was not in the facility, she put the pre-filled out sheet behind the currently displayed sheet and night shift staff flipped it. During an interview on 7/3/25 at 10:31 A.M., the Administrator indicated that the facility did not have a policy for Posted Nurse Staffing, but they followed the federal regulation.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2022-08-12 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure completed staffing sheets were posted daily for 7 of 7 days during the survey. Findings include: On 8/3/22 at 10:0 A.M., a staffing sheet was observed to be posted on the window of the front desk by the main entrance. The staffing sheet indicated the date, total census, and total hours worked each shift. Disciplines included LPN, RN, QMA, and CNA. Specific number of staff and exact hours worked were not included in the posting. On 8/10/22 at 9:19 A.M., staff posting sheets from 8/1/22 through 8/10/22 were provided. Each staff posting sheet indicated the date, total census, and total hours worked each shift. Specific number of staff and exact hours worked were not included. At that time, the Human Resources Coordinator indicated the staff posting form was put together previous to the new staff in the facility, and was unaware it was not correct. On 8/11/22 at 10:59 A.M., a current non-dated Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers policy was provided and indicated The information recorded on the form…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+17.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.7M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 77%Medicare 6%Other / private 17%

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$331per resident / day
operating cost
$10,072per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$401per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155670. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next