No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Newburgh Health and Rehab

10466 Pollack Ave, Newburgh, IN 47630 · For profit - Corporation · 114 certified beds · (812) 853-2931 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (812) 853-2931 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Apr 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
10466 Pollack Ave · (812) 853-2931 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4209 Gateway Blvd · (812) 450-3784 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6401 E Lloyd Expy · (812) 402-5361 · Call to confirm hours
Park
· Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
10488 State Route 662 W · (812) 842-2500

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.5%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.5%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.7%0.4%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%25.2%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.4%3.9%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.8%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication34.2%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.3%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.2%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.2%23.3%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.3%13.6%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.1%79.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.8%22.2%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.3%10.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.091.611.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.231.441.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 63 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
63.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.18U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 63.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.0%CMS range 30.2–56.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.5–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge63.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge45.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge63.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 3.1–10.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.53
RN hours/ resident / day
1.02
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.75
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.31
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
51.5%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 51.9 residents a day — about 46% occupied, or roughly 62 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.31 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.75 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.56 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-17)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-13)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2026-06-17 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient dietary support staff were employed and had relevant training to carry out safe functions of food and nutrition services for 1 of 1 kitchens reviewed. Nursing staff and facility leadership staff without training in dietary services completed meal service preparation, meal service, and sanitization at the end of the meal for 19 days in May. (Kitchen)Finding includes:Anonymous interview on 6/15/26 at 1:25 P.M. indicated nursing staff were cooking the food for the residents. The meals were not edible, cold, and never served on time.On 6/16/26 at 8:43 A.M., the Dietary Schedule for 5/24/26 through 6/16/26 was reviewed. An evening cook was not scheduled for 5/24/26 or 5/25/26.Interview on 6/16/26 at 9:31 A.M., the Kitchen Manager indicated her first day at the facility was 5/24/26. Prior to that, nursing staff cooked the residents' food due to a lack of dietary staff.At that time, food temperature logs for 5/1/26 through 6/15/26 were reviewed. Final cooked temperatures and holding temperatures were not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was served at palatable temperatures for 1 of 1 trays tested for temperature. (East Hall Unit)Findings include:On 6/15/26 at 12:50 P.M., a test tray was obtained from the East Hall Unit. The hot food tasted cold. Temperatures were:BBQ sandwich- 131.4 degrees Fahrenheit (F)Green beans-109.8 degrees FCubed potatoes-110 degrees FSoup-120 degrees FChocolate pudding 68.9 degrees FCup of hot water-103.8 degrees F During an interview on 6/15/26 at 1:10 P.M. with the Dietary Manager indicated that hot foods should be 135 degrees F or greater and cold foods should be 41 degrees F or lower.On 6/16/26 at 10:15 A.M., the Administrator provided a current, non-dated policy Food and Beverage Temperature Control. The policy indicated .hot foods are to be served at 135 degrees F or higher and cold food/beverages should be served at 41 degrees F or lower.This citation relates to Intake 3041445410 Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 16.2-3.1-21(a)(2)

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident had been provided with a safe, clean environment by not providing clean bed linens for 1 of 1 resident. Damp, soiled, and stained bed pad and linen were observed during a random observation of a resident's bed. (Resident V) Findings include:Anonymous interview on 6/15/26 at 1:25 P.M., indicated staff left dirty and wet bed pads on Resident V's bed. Observation on 6/17/26 at 9:35 A.M., Resident V's made up bed was observed with the sheets pulled up over a damp bed pad that smelled of urine and when the sheets were pulled back a yellow stained bottom sheet was observed. On 6/17/26 at 10:30 A.M., Resident V's clinical record was reviewed. Resident V diagnosis included, but was not limited to, overactive bladder. The current annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) indicated Resident V was cognitively intact. The current care plan for incontinence bladder interventions were reviewed on June 15, 2026, those included; clean peri-area with each incontinence episode dated 5/14/25.Check as scheduled/PRN (pro re…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents dependent on staff for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) were showered for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Resident S, Resident T, and Resident U)Findings include:1. On 6/15/26 at 9:54 A.M., Resident S's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side.The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 5/14/26, indicated Resident S was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff (staff does all the work) for showering.Current care plans included, but were not limited to:Resident S requires assistance with self-care and mobility tasks related to left side hemiplegia, hemorrhagic stroke, dated 11/5/25The Point of Care (POC) (a charting system for Certified Nurse Aides) Task Response for Showering and shower records were reviewed. Resident S did not receive a shower or complete bed bath on the following days since 5/29/26:6/5/262. On 6/15/26 at 10:06 A.M., Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager was certified for 1 of 1 Dietary Manager Qualifications reviewed. Finding includes:During an interview on 4/13/26 at 9:05 A.M., the Dietary Manager indicated that she did not have kitchen manager certification, but she was enrolled in a class to obtain it.On 4/16/26 at 11:13 A.M., the Dietary Manager's employee file was reviewed. The Dietary Manager began employment with the facility on 3/5/26 and was enrolled in a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) course on 2/17/26. Her job application to the facility indicated that she was not a CDM and was still in school to obtain the certification.On 4/17/26 at 10:35 A.M., the Administrator provided a current Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) Job Description policy, dated 2025, that indicated Graduate of a Foodservice Manager Training Program or a 2-year or 4-year foodservice management or nutrition program. Successful completion of CDM Credentialing Exam with active CDM, CFPP (Certified Food Protection Professional) certification status. 410 Indiana…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure designation of a certified Infection Preventionist (IP). The facility did not currently employee a staff member who dedicated at least part time to the role of IP or perform facility tracking of infections.Finding includes:During an interview on 6/15/26 at 12:28 P.M., RN 4 indicated she helped with infection control tasks as needed and did not dedicate specific hours per week to infection prevention tasks such as facility tracking of infections and antibiotics, but reviewed progress notes from previous shifts for signs of infections. During an interview on 6/15/26 at 12:49 P.M., the Administrator indicated the previous Infection Preventionist left the position last month (May) and a new Infection Preventionist had not started yet. During an observation on 6/16/26 at 9:51 A.M., the facility's infection prevention tracking and staff education binder was reviewed. RN 4 confirmed tracking of facility infections, antibiotic use, and staff education had not been completed since April 2026. On 6/16/26 at 1:18…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — pattern
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that quarterly care conferences were conducted on 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, 1 of 3 residents reviewed for MDS (Minimum Data Set) and 1 of 2 reviewed for choices. (Resident 8, Resident 25, Resident 38, Resident 7, Resident C) Findings include:1. On 4/14/26 at 9:19 A.M., Resident 8's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 8 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, hypertension. The most recent Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 3/13/26, indicated Resident 8's cognition was not assessed, the resident required partial assistance for toileting, and substantial assistance from staff (staff do more than half of the work) for bathing. The clinical record lacked a care plan conference held since admission. 2. On 4/14/26 at 9:10 A.M., Resident 7's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were completed accurately for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for skin conditions and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident C, Resident 7, Resident 8, Resident 49) Findings include:1. On 4/14/26 at 1:20 P.M., Resident C's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebrovascular disease. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 3/4/26, indicated Resident C was not assessed for cognitive impairment but was coded to indicate an assessment should be completed. During an interview on 4/16/26 at 2:20 P.M., the MDS Coordinator indicated that Resident C could have been assessed for cognitive impairment but wasn't because there was not any staff available to administer the test at the time the assessment was due. During an interview on 4/17/26 at 9:06 A.M., the Administrator indicated that a corporate MDS staff member completed MDS assessments during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage and labeling of medication for 4 of 4 medication carts observed. Loose pills and unlabeled medications were observed in the medication carts. (Front [NAME] Hall, Back [NAME] Hall, Front East Hall, Back East Hall, Resident 22, Resident 25, Resident 39) Findings include: On 4/13/25 at 8:55 A.M., the following loose pills were observed in the [NAME] Front Medication Cart:4 1/2 small white pill1/2 white oval pill1 small round white pill with number L 161/2 large white oval pill1 small round brown pill with *7251 small round white pill with number 9131 small white pill with numbers 3461/2 small round pink pill1 small round white pill with letter U1 small round white pill with Numbers 33461 blue and white capsule with the number PRIMA 361/2 small blue oval pill1 oval white pill with numbers 564 On 4/13/26 at 9:10 A.M., the following loose pills were observed in the [NAME] Back Hall Medication Cart:1/2 small round pill1 green oval pill with LU1 large white pill with the number 4831 small peach…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions and monitor equipment for proper sanitization levels for 1 of 1 kitchens observed. Food was left open to air, expired food was not disposed of, and dishwasher chemical sanitization logs were not filled out. (Kitchen) Finding includes:During the initial tour on 4/13/26 at 9:05 A.M., the following was observed:The low-temperature chemical dishwasher April 2026 log was hanging on the wall across from the dishwasher. It was blank. At that time, the Dietary Manager indicated that staff should be filling it in each time they tested the dishwasher for sanitization levels. Staff tested the dishwasher for sanitization levels before each meal.In the walk-in dairy refrigerator: Sliced cheese open to air with no dateShredded cheese open to airIn the walk-in vegetable refrigerator:Coleslaw carton with a use by date of 4/9/26In the dry storage room:Bulk sugar container open to airBulk oatmeal container open to airOn 4/17/26 at 10:36 A.M., the Administrator provided a Mechanical Ware…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the provider of weight changes outside of order parameters for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for weight change. (Resident 5) Finding includes:On 4/14/26 at 9:58 A.M., Resident 5's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure and chronic kidney disease.The most current Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 3/10/26, indicated Resident 5's cognitive function was assessed by staff and the resident's memory was OK and he was independent in making decisions about his daily life. He required supervision of staff for transferring and partial to moderate assistance (staff does less than half the work) for toileting. He weighed 226 pounds (lbs) and had no weight loss.A nutritional risk care plan, initiated 12/18/25, included an intervention to monitor weights as ordered.A fluid overload care plan, initiated 12/14/25, included an intervention to weigh as scheduled.Physician orders included but were not limited to:Fax weekly weights to Nursing Home Triage (NHT)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents ordered an as needed (PRN) anti-anxiety medication had a specific duration, or stop date, for the medication prescribed for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for hospice and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for choices. (Resident 4, Resident 48, and Resident 7) Findings include: 1. On 4/15/26 at 9:13 A.M., Resident 4's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease. The most recent Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 3/24/26, indicated Resident 4 was rarely understood and was dependent on staff for eating, bathing, toileting, and transfers (staff do all of the work). Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Lorazepam (an antianxiety medication) oral tablet 0.5 MG (milligrams) Give one tablet by mouth every 30 minutes as needed for anxiety/restlessness; Start date 3/15/26 The order lacked a stop date for PRN lorazepam. Resident 4's electronic medication administration record (eMAR) from March 2026 through April 2026 was reviewed. As needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were completed timely for 1 of 3 closed records reviewed and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wounds. (Resident C and Resident 49) Findings include:1. On 4/14/26 at 1:20 P.M., Resident C's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebrovascular disease. Resident C was discharged from the facility to the hospital on 3/27/26 and did not return to the facility. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 3/4/26, indicated Resident C was not assessed for cognitive impairment and required substantial to maximal assistance (staff does more than half the work) for toileting. A Discharge MDS Assessment was not completed. During an interview on 4/16/26 at 2:20 P.M., the MDS Coordinator indicated that the previous MDS Coordinator did not complete Resident C's Discharge MDS Assessment. 2. On 4/14/26 at 1:58 P.M. Resident 49's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, osteoarthritis. The most…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed no less than once every 3 months for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for Resident Assessment. (Resident 6)Finding includes: On 4/6 at 11:26 A.M., Resident 6's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, disorder of the kidney and ureter and essential primary hypertensionThe most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] but was not completed until 4/10/26. During an interview on 4/17/26 at 10:35 A.M., the Social Services Director indicated care plan conferences needed to be done every 3 months.On 4/17/26 at 10:40 A.M., the Administrator provided a current policy Care Planning dated 2/2026. The policy indicated . The facility will discuss the care plan with the resident and/or representative at regularly scheduled care plan conferences, initially, at routine intervals, and after significant changes .410 Indiana Administrative Code 16.2-3.1-31(d)(3)

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for restraints, and develop a care plan for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Interventions for call lights to be within reach were not implemented and there was no care plan developed for antianxiety and antidepressant medications use. (Resident 3, Resident 2, and Resident 38)Findings include:1. During an observation on 4/13/26 at 11:22 A.M., CNA 2 and QMA 4 were observed using a sit to stand lift to transfers Resident 3 from the bathroom to the wheelchair. Resident 3's call light was under the bed and out of reach. During an observation on 4/15/26 10:20 A.M., Resident 3 was observed in bed and the call light was on the floor under the foot of the bed. During an observation on 4/16/26 at 8:52 A.M., Resident 3 was laying in bed; two wheelchairs were in the resident's within line of sight and the call light was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents dependent on staff for ADLs (activities of daily living) were showered for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Resident C) Finding includes:During an anonymous interview on 4/14/26 at 1:20 P.M., it was indicated that Resident C was transported to the hospital from the facility on 3/27/26. Upon arrival in the emergency room, Resident C appeared generally unkempt.On 4/14/26 at 1:25 P.M., Resident C's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebrovascular disease.The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 3/4/26, indicated Resident C was not assessed for cognitive impairment and required partial to moderate assistance of staff (staff does less than half the work) for bathing.A current assistance with self-care and mobility tasks care plan, dated 12/15/25, indicated Resident C required substantial to maximal assistance (staff does more than half the work) for bathing.On 4/16/26 at 12:30 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 6 provided shower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with signs and symptoms of fluid overload were monitored according to physician order for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for significant weight change. (Resident 5) Finding includes:On 4/14/26 at 9:58 A.M., Resident 5's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure and chronic kidney disease.The most current Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 3/10/26, indicated Resident 5's cognitive function was assessed by staff and the resident's memory was OK and he was independent in making decisions about his daily life. He required supervision of staff for transferring and partial to moderate assistance (staff does less than half the work) for toileting. He weighed 226 pounds (lbs) and had no weight loss.A nutritional risk care plan, initiated 12/18/25, included an intervention to monitor weights as ordered.A fluid overload care plan, initiated 12/14/25, included an intervention to weigh as scheduled. (Signs and symptoms of fluid overload include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacist medication recommendations were reviewed and acted upon by the physician for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 8) Finding includes: On 4/14/26 at 9:19 A.M., Resident 8's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 8 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, pulmonary embolism.The most recent Significant Change MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 8's cognition was not assessed, the resident required partial assistance for toileting, substantial assistance from staff for bathing, and received anticoagulant medication during the lookback period. Physician orders included, but were not limited to:Eliquis (an anticoagulant medication) oral tablet 2.5 MG (milligrams) Give one tablet by mouth in the morning related to pulmonary embolism; Start date 3/13/26On 4/15/26 at 12:13 P.M., the Administrator provided a pharmacy document titled New admission Review, dated 3/13/26. The document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were implemented during 1 of 2 random observation of care and infection control practices were not implemented during 1 of 2 insulin administrations. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 4/13/26 at 11:22 A.M., CNA 2 and QMA 4 entered Resident 3's bathroom. Resident 3 was cleaned up and assisted off of the toilet and on to the sit to stand lift. Resident 3 was moved from the bathroom to the wheelchair in the bedroom. Resident 3 was not offered to wash his hands; CNA 2 and QMA 4 wore gloves but did not wear gowns during the care and transfer of Resident 4. On 4/14/26 at 10:40 A.M., Resident 3's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behavioral disturbances, anxiety, and post traumatic stress disorder. The most recent Discharge MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 3's cognition was not assessed, the resident required partial assistance for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were given at the ordered time for 2 of 3 residents during morning medication pass, and signed as given on the Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. (Resident B, Resident C, Resident D) Finding includes: 1. On 2/9/26 at 10:58 a.m, QMA 2 (Qualified Medication Aide) was observed preparing medications for Resident D. The following medications were observed to be taken out of the packaging and put into a medication cup: aspirin (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory) 81 mg (milligram) ferrous sulfate ((mineral supplement) 325 mg QMA 2 was observed to look for Resident D's Lasix (diuretic) 40 mg in the medication cart. LPN 3 came to the cart, and QMA 2 left to go look for more of the medication. At 11:04 a.m., LPN 3 (Licensed Practical Nurse) indicated she had already given Resident D her morning medications, and she would let QMA 2 know when she got back to the cart. LPN 3 indicated she had been passing morning medications and had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager met required qualifications for 1 of 1 dietary manager qualifications reviewed. (Dietary Manager) Finding includes: During an interview on 2/10/25 at 11:39 A.M., the Dietary Manager indicated he did not have a dietary manager certification and was not currently enrolled in a program. On 2/11/25 at 10:15 A.M., the Dietary Manager's employee file was reviewed. The Dietary Manager started employment as a dietary cook on 8/5/23, and signed a job description on the start of the role as Dietary Manager on 10/3/24. During an interview on 2/12/25 at 9:27 A.M., the Administrator indicated the dietician worked through a contract and was only in the facility approximately once a week. On 2/13/25 at 9:54 A.M., the Administrator provided a policy titled Dietary Manager Job Description, dated 1/17, that indicated Completion of approved dietary manager training course is preferred. Employee is required to enroll and successfully complete the course after hire if certification has not been completed at the time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-13 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to comprehensively complete and implement a facility assessment to accurately determine the care and resources needed for resident care. This had the potential to affect 59 residents in the facility. Finding includes: On 2/9/25 at 10:03 A.M. during the Entrance Conference with the Administrator, the facility assessment was requested. Census at that time was 59 residents. On 2/11/25 at 3:00 P.M., the Administrator provided a facility assessment and indicated it had been completed by the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) that day (2/11/25). She indicated a facility assessment had not been completed or updated for the facility since 2022. At that time, she indicated it should be updated annually. On 2/13/25 at 10:44 A.M., the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator provided a Facility Assessment Tool policy, dated 8/18/17, that indicated To ensure the required thoroughness, individuals involved in the facility assessment should, at a minimum, include the administrator, a representative of the governing body, the medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-13 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) and Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings were held quarterly and the required staff were present. This had the potential to affect 59 residents in the facility. Finding includes: During an interview on 2/9/25 at 10:03 A.M., the Administrator indicated census in the facility was 59 residents. On 2/13/25 at 8:30 A.M., the QAA and QAPI Minutes sign in sheet for a meeting held on 1/15/25 was reviewed. The sign in sheet lacked documentation that the Medical Director (MD) or a designee was present for the meeting. During an interview on 2/13/25 at 9:13 A.M., the Administrator indicated that the QAPI meeting on 1/15/25 was the first QAPI meeting held since she began employment at the facility on 4/17/24. She indicated QAPI was supposed to meet quarterly. During an interview on 2/13/25 at 10:09 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the QAPI committee had not been meeting as consistently as it should. On 2/10/25 at 10:30 A.M., the Administrator provided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene and Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were implemented for 2 of 2 residents observed for care (Resident 41 and Resident 10) and opportunities for waterborne illness were tested for 59 of 59 residents who consume water in the facility. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 2/11/25 at 9:51 A.M., Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 7 entered Resident 41's room. QMA 7 put on gloves and began administering medications through Resident 41's percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube (a tube inserted through the abdominal wall into the stomach). Resident 41's PEG tube began leaking the medication and stomach contents back out of the tube. QMA 7 exited the room and came back into the room with two nurses who assisted QMA 7 in changing the adapter valve on the PEG tube. QMA 7 began administering medications again. Hand hygiene was not performed during care of Resident 41, and a gown was not worn by QMA 7 or either of the nurses providing direct patient care to Resident 41. On 2/11/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure designation of a certified Infection Preventionist (IP). The IP had not received specialized training in infection prevention and control when starting the IP role and did not dedicate at least part time hours to the role of IP for 1 of 1 staff members reviewed for IP. Finding includes: During an interview on 2/12/25 at 10:17 A.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) indicated that she was responsible for the Infection Prevention and Control Program in the facility but did not have a current Infection Preventionist certification. She indicated she was able to dedicate approximately 12 hours per week to the infection control program. On 2/12/25 at 1:12 P.M., the ADON's employee file was reviewed. The employee file lacked any job description or roles in the facility related to infection preventionist. On 2/9/25 at 12:30 P.M., the Administrator provided a policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program, revised 10/2018, that indicated The infection prevention and control program is coordinated and overseen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. On 2/10/25 at 11:54 A.M., Resident 36's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with anxiety and major depression. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/16/25, indicated Resident 36 was moderately cognitively impaired, required substantial to maximal assistance of staff (staff does more than half) with showering, dressing, and transferring, and had one fall since the prior assessment. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Encourage resident to wear proper footwear when out of bed every shift for fall prevention, dated 4/17/23. The most current fall risk assessment, dated 2/12/25, indicated that the resident was at high risk for falls. An Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) Care Plan Health Meeting note, dated 1/14/25 at 2:00 P.M., indicated that the care plan was reviewed and the facility would continue the current plan of care. The most current Fall Risk care plan, dated 4/18/23, included the following interventions:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan conferences were completed quarterly for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance. (Resident 6 and Resident 13) Findings include: 1. On 2/11/25 at 9:22 A.M., Resident 6's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease and type 4 fracture of sacrum. The most current Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 11/15/24, indicated Resident 6 had mild cognitive impairment and required substantial to maximal assistance of staff (staff does more than half) for eating, toileting, and bathing. The most current care plan conference was completed on 7/10/24 at 1:00 P.M. On 2/12/25 at 10:49 A.M., the Social Services Director (SSD) provided a document entitled Care Plan Meetings that indicated a letter had been sent on 9/10/24 to invite Resident 6's family to a care plan conference. The clinical record lacked documentation to indicate a care plan conference had been completed at that time or at any time since 7/10/24. 2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were being developed and implemented after new diagnoses and physician orders for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for urinary tract infections. (Resident 43 and Resident 46) Findings include: 1. On 2/11/25 at 9:56 A.M., Resident 43's clinical record was reviewed. The resident had diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, pneumonia and congestive heart failure. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/16/25, indicated Resident 43's cognition was significantly impaired, required partial to moderate assistance of staff (staff does less than half) with eating, and substantial to maximum assistance of staff (staff does more than half) with bathing, toileting and bed mobility, and no weight loss during the last month. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: mirtazapine tablet 7.5 mg (milligrams) - one tablet by mouth at bedtime for appetite, ordered 1/27/25. Nursing Measure: Fax Daily Weights every day shift every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan to reflect changes to a resident's gastrostomy device for 1 of 1 reviewed. (Resident 41) Finding includes: On 2/11/25 at 12:27 P.M., Resident 41's clinical record was reviewed. The resident had diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, cerebral palsy. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/10/24, indicated the resident was not cognitively intact, was dependent on staff (staff does everything) for bed mobility, and had an enteral feeding tube. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube 18F (French), 7-10 cc (cubic centimeters) in place, dated 4/30/23. The clinical record lacked an order for a Mic-Key gastro tube button. On 12/10/24, an Interdisciplinary Team care plan conference meeting was held for Resident 41 and the assessment indicated to continue current plan of care. Care plans for Resident 41 included, but were not limited to: The resident requires tube feeding related to: dysphagia, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was properly labeled and respiratory services were provided according to professional standards for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 25, Resident 16, Resident 13) Findings include: 1. On 2/9/25 at 9:30 A.M., Resident 25 was observed lying in bed with Oxygen (O2) at 3 Liters Per Minute) L/m per nasal cannula and the oxygen tubing was not dated. On 2/10/25 at 8:48 A.M., Resident 25 was observed lying in bed with O2 at 3L/m per nasal cannula and the oxygen tubing was not dated. On 2/11/25 at 8:34 A.M., Resident 25 was observed lying in bed with O2 at 3L/m per nasal cannula and the oxygen tubing was not dated. On 2/12/25 at 10:20 A.M., Resident 25 was observed lying in bed with O2 at 3L/m nasal cannula and the oxygen tubing was not dated. On 02/10/25 at 11:27 A.M., Resident 25's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseased (COPD). The most current Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of greater than 5 percent for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 54 and Resident 36) observed during medication pass. Two medication errors were observed during #25 opportunities for error in medication administration. This resulted in a medication error rate of eight (8) percent. Findings include: 1. During a medication administration observation on 2/11/25 at 11:59 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) 5 prepared an insulin injection for Resident 36. RN 5 attempted to prime the insulin pen without the needle attached. RN 5 then administered 14 units of insulin lispro (an antidiabetic injection medication) into Resident 36's upper right arm. On 2/11/25 at 12:30 P.M., Resident 36's clinical record was reviewed. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Admelog (insulin lispro) - Inject 14 units subcutaneously in the afternoon, dated 11/26/24 2. During a medication administration observation on 2/12/25 at 1:02 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 6 prepared an insulin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment during 3 random observations. The hallway floors were sticky and soiled. (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], Main Dining Hall) Findings include: 1. During an initial walkthrough of the facility on 12/18/24 at 10:55 A.M., the hallway floor outside room [ROOM NUMBER] was noted to have a large red sticky substance with smaller drip marks next to it. The hallway floor in between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] was noted to have a large black substance. During a reinspection of the hallway floors on 12/18/24 at 2:11 P.M., the hallway floor outside room [ROOM NUMBER] was noted to have a large red sticky substance with smaller drip marks next to it. The hallway floor in between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] was noted to have a large black substance. 2. On 12/19/24 at 8:26 A.M., the hallway floor outside room [ROOM NUMBER] was noted to have a large red sticky substance with smaller…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was respected for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dignity and 3 of 3 random observations. (Resident 53, Resident 20, Resident 31, Resident F) Findings include: 1. On 12/13/23 at 8:06 A.M., CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) 21 was observed in Resident 20's room assisting the resident to eat breakfast. CNA 21 was standing in front of the resident who was sitting in her wheelchair and was using her cell phone. On 12/13/23 at 10:58 A.M., Resident 20's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease and COVID-19. The most recent quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 9/21/23, indicated the resident's mental status could not be assessed because the resident was rarely or never understood, and required total assistance of 1 (one) staff for eating. A current late loss ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care plan, revised 4/26/23, included an intervention of see Nurse Aide assignement [sic] sheet for details on staff assist needed. The most recent CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide proper storage of medications in 2 of 2 medication carts and 2 of 2 medication rooms reviewed. Loose pills were observed in medication carts with improperly labeled medications, and the medication refrigerator lacked temperature readings. (West Hall Medication Cart, [NAME] Hall Medication Room, East Hall Medication Room) Findings include: On 12/13/23 at 9:17 A.M., the following was observed in one of the two [NAME] Hall Medication carts: 1 round white pill with 210 1 blue caplet oblong with number 675 1/2 oblong white pill 1 small round with TP 1 bottle of Valporic Acid opened and not dated bottom drawer was sticky On 12/13/23 at 9:30 A.M., the following was observed in the other [NAME] Hall Medication Cart: 1 yellow piece 1 round multicolored brown pill 1 small yellow round pill with heart on it 1 round peach colored pill with letter M 1/2 white pill 1 white pill with the letters CL On 12/14/23 at 10:30 A.M., the following was observed in the East Hall Medication refrigerator: beer - no name boost -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to properly prevent and/or contain COVID-19 for 7 of 11 residents reviewed for infection control. (Resident 20, Resident 53, Resident 41, Resident 27, Resident 38, Resident 314, Resident 315) Findings include: 1. On 12/13/23 at 8:06 A.M., CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) 21 was observed in Resident 20's room assisting her to eat. CNA 21 was not wearing any PPE and her surgical mask was pulled down around her chin. At that time, the sign outside the resident's room indicated that the resident was on contact precautions for COVID-19. On 12/13/23 at 8:14 A.M., QMA (Qualified Medication Aide) 17 indicated staff should have on gown, gloves, a face shield, and an N95 mask while in COVID-19 rooms. She further indicated CNA 21 needed to have on PPE while in Resident 20's room. At that time, CNA 21 indicated she hung her gown on the back of the door in resident 20's room to reuse later. On 12/13/23 at 10:58 A.M., Resident 20's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, COVID-19. The most recent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination related to bathing for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). A resident's preference for showers and to have hair washed three times a week was not honored. (Resident F) Findings include: On 12/11/23 at 10:09 A.M., Resident F indicated she had requested her hair to be washed three times a week (twice by staff and once by the beauty shop), and it was not being done. She indicated she had currently gone two weeks without her hair being washed. Resident F indicated she would rather take showers, but staff was currently only providing bed baths. Resident F indicated staff did not wash her hair with every bed bath. On 12/12/23 at 12:39 P.M., Resident F's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, morbid obesity, anxiety, and depression. The most recent state optional and quarterly MDS (minimum data set) Assessment, dated 11/6/23, indicated no cognitive impairment, no rejection or refusals of care, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure notification of change for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for elevated blood pressure. The physician was not notified timely of a resident's decline in condition. (Resident 31) Finding includes: On 12/13/23 at 11:27 A.M., Resident 31's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage and hypertension. The most recent admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 9/12/23, indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment with no behaviors. The clinical record indicated Resident 31 had a history of stroke. Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] following a hemorrhagic stroke with right hemiparesis. The Resident was sent to the hospital on 9/23/23 for a CVA (cerebrovascular accident). Current physician orders included, but was not limited to: Clonidine HCl (an antihypertensive medication) oral tablet 0.1 MG (milligram) - Give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure PRN (as needed) antianxiety medications were evaluated every 14 days for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident 265, Resident 48, Resident F). Findings include: 1. On 12/14/23 at 9:18 A.M., Resident 265's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 265's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, anxiety disorder. The most recent admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 11/4/23, indicated Resident 265 was cognitively intact and received an antianxiety medication during the 7 day look back period. Current physician orders included, but was not limited to: Lorazepam (an antianxiety medication) Oral Tablet 0.5 MG (milligrams) - Give 1 tablet by mouth as needed for anxiety three times a day as needed, dated 11/27/2023 The November 2023 MAR (medication administration record) indicated Resident 265 received lorazepam on 11/28, 11/29, and twice on 11/30. The December 2023 MAR indicated Resident 265 received lorazepam on 12/2,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was in place to prevent a resident with dementia from exiting the facility and returning home for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for elopement. (Resident C) Finding includes: During an observation on 8/21/23 at 8:40 A.M., the facility's front door was unlocked, and no staff were present at the front desk. During a review of facility reported incidents on 8/21/23 at 9:30 A.M., an incident reported by the DON on 8/4/23 included that Resident C was noted to not be in his room. Staff conducted a search on the unit, an elopement code was initiated for the building, and staff searched the facility grounds and neighboring area. Resident C's wife notified the facility around 12:00 P.M. that Resident C was attempting to walk home and requested a ride from someone. Resident C was discovered after his wife arrived home from an appointment. During record review on 8/21/23 at 9:45 A.M., Resident C's diagnoses included, but were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DAVIESS COUNTY HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/01/2015
WEIGEL, SUZANNEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/05/2016
STEINER, DERONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2015
CONROY, TRACYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2017
RODEWALD, AMANDAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2017

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-27.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 64%Medicare 7%Other / private 29%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$376per resident / day
operating cost
$11,441per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$295per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155354. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next