Peabody Retirement Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 83 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 192 beds and averages 174.5 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.19 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.88 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.30 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was cognitively impaired and assessed as an elopement risk, was observed overnight and provided with care checks. This deficient practice resulted in the resident eloping from the facility and being unaccounted for overnight for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for elopements. (Resident B) The Immediate Jeopardy began on 5/23/24 when the facility failed to ensure a resident who was cognitively impaired and assessed as an elopement risk, was observed overnight and provided with care checks. The resident eloped from the facility on 5/23/24 at 10:34 p.m. and being unaccounted for overnight until 5/24/24 at 7:09 a.m. when he was found in a local park approximately one-half mile from the facility. The resident complained of being cold and had been incontinent of bowel when he was located by a staff member. The Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy at 4:59 p.m. on 6/5/24. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed, and the deficient practice corrected on 5/24/24, prior to the start of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services for effective supervision were provided to ensure a pencil sharpener was not left unattended and within the reach of a cognitively impaired resident with dementia for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dementia care. This deficient practice resulted in Resident B ingesting the sharpener blade and required hospitalization for surgical removal. Findings include: On 4/16/24 at 11:10 a.m., Resident B was observed in A wheelchair at a table in the common area, with a staff member sitting next to her. On 4/18/24 at 12:07 p.m., Resident B was observed in a wheelchair with her head down and her eyes closed, in the dining room. A staff member was assisting another resident at the same table. Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 4/16/24 at 10:47 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease with early onset, dementia in other disease classified elsewhere, moderate, with agitation, psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition, and unspecified mood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure hospital discharge orders were accurately transcribed to ensure continuation of treatment for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for new admissions. (Resident B and Resident D)Findings include:1.Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 6/29/26 at 9:29 a.m. Diagnoses included essential (primary) hypertension, anxiety disorder, depression, and bipolar II disorder.A behavioral health care office note, dated 2/4/26, indicated Resident B's medications included bupropion (antidepressant) 200 milligram (mg) every morning and at noon, and divalproex (anticonvulsant/mood stabilizer) 500 mg in the morning and 1000 mg at bedtime. He was discharged from the hospital to the facility on 3/11/26. Discharge orders included bupropion 450 mg daily, divalproex sodium 500 mg daily, divalproex sodium 250 mg twice daily, and divalproex sodium 1000 mg at bedtime. The March 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated divalproex sodium 500 mg at bedtime and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-18 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a required Preadmission Screening and Record Review (PASRR) Level I screening assessment to determine if a Level II assessment was required when a resident received a new major mental illness diagnosis for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident 2, Resident 6, and Resident 160). Findings include: 1. Resident 160's clinical record was reviewed on 5/14/26 at 12:37 p.m. Diagnoses included psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition, depression, anxiety, and mood disorder due to known physiological condition with depressive features. Resident 160's clinical record indicated mood disorder was added as diagnosis 4/3/24 and the psychotic disorder diagnosis was added 4/1/25. A PASARR level I screening, dated 10/10/19, indicated Resident 160 had a diagnosis of depression/depressive disorder and took the medication escitalopram (antidepressant). The record lacked any additional Level I screenings. A physician's order,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to identify targeted behaviors and individualized interventions to clinically support the use of an antipsychotic medication for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for chemical restraints. (Residents 2 and 3) 1.During an observation on 5/12/26 at 10:02 a.m., Resident 2 was asleep in his wheelchair and the television was on. On 5/14/26 at 11:18 a.m., Resident 2 was sitting in his wheelchair in his room talking with a visitor. He laughed intermittently and waved to staff passing by. On 5/18/26 at 10:45 a.m., Resident 2 was up and dressed, sitting in his wheelchair in the living area, watching television. He was quiet and slept intermittently. Resident 2's clinical record was reviewed on 5/14/26 at 10:05 a.m. Diagnoses included senile degeneration of the brain (2/3/26), depression (9/8/23), unspecified dementia (unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety) (9/11/23), anxiety disorder…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure insulin pen needles were primed prior to administration according to manufacturer's instructions and professional standards to ensure the full dosage was received for 1 of 14 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident 17)Findings include:On 5/13/26 at 6:58 p.m., during a medication administration observation, LPN 4 administered 32 units of insulin glargine (long acting insulin) to Resident 17. LPN 4 did not prime the pen needle before administration. Upon completion of administration, LPN 4 indicated she did not prime insulin pen needles before administration.On 5/14/26 at 12:39 p.m., the DON indicated staff should prime the insulin pen before administration.Resident 17's clinical record was reviewed on 5/14/26 at 10:44 a.m. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus and a physician order for insulin glargine inject 32 units at bedtime.A facility document, titled Insulin Injections, provided by the Infection Control Nurse, on 9/25/23 at 11:35 a.m., indicated the following under the heading Administering…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  A. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a cognitively impaired resident to prevent repeated falls for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for falls (Resident 45).B. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide safe bed mobility assistance for a dependent resident which resulted in the resident being rolled out of the bed and onto the floor by staff for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for falls (Resident 7). Findings include: A1. During an observation, on 5/11/26 at 12:16 p.m., Resident 45 sat in a wheelchair in the dining room at a table. His face was bruised on the right side of his face, around his eye. On 5/12/26 at 10:20 a.m., Resident 45 attempted to stand on his own three times. CNA 14 attempted to assist the resident to a wheelchair. She was unable to complete the transfer on her own and asked CNA 15 to assist her with the resident's transfer. Once the resident was transferred, he immediately stood up again and was unwilling to sit down. CNA 14 asked him if he needed to use the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prepare and distribute food in a safe and sanitary manner. This deficient practice has the potential to affect 46 of 46 residents who receive meals from the Transitional Care Unit and Tulip Place kitchenette. Finding includes: During a meal service observation on 4/4/25 at 11:30 a.m., Dietary [NAME] 8 donned gloves and utilized utensils to scoop food items onto plates, warmed up a cooked hamburger on the griddle, picked up the mustard container with his gloved hands, and applied mustard to the hamburger. While wearing the same gloves, Dietary [NAME] 8 removed an egg roll from inside a warmer and placed it onto a resident's plate. He prepared four more resident's plates dipping up the stir fry and rice with utensils and placing the egg rolls on the plates with his gloved hands. He doffed his gloves, washed his hands with soap and water, and donned new gloves. Dietary [NAME] 8 used his gloved hand to place a plate on the serving board. He used the same gloved hand to remove an egg roll from inside the warmer and placed it on a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A6. During an observation on 4/2/25 at 4:52 p.m., CNA 15 approached Resident 153's room, where a droplet isolation sign was in place at the door. The droplet isolation sign indicated everyone was required to perform hand hygiene before entering and when leaving the room. A face shield or goggles was required. The face protection was required to be removed prior to exiting the room. She donned a gown and gloves, and entered the resident's room. CNA 15 already had a surgical mask in place when she approached the resident's room. The mask was not changed when she entered the room and delivered a cup of water to the resident. She wore regular eyeglasses. Eye protection was not worn during the observation. CNA 15 doffed her gown and gloves and exited the room at 4:54 p.m., without removing her surgical mask. She continued to deliver water to random residents' rooms on the Cedar Ridge Unit. Resident 153's clinical record was reviewed on 4/4/25 at 10:52 a.m. Diagnoses included influenza due to identified novel…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to promote resident dignity by failing to provide prompt care for bowel incontinence for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dignity. (Resident 71) Finding includes: Confidential interviews were conducted during the course of the survey. During the confidential interview, the interviewee indicated Resident 71 had been assisted into a wheelchair and out of his room that day. The resident indicated he had been having a bowel movement as he left the room. He was not permitted to return to his room because his room was being sprayed for pests. The room had been sprayed about an hour ago. The resident had been in the common area since he had left his room. The staff members were aware the resident was soiled, but did not know what to do and did not know how to help him get changed as they were not permitted to return to the resident's room due to the exterminator's spray. During an interview on 4/7/25 at 2:36 p.m., Resident 71 indicated his room had been treated today for pests, and he had to stay out of his room. He was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who self-administered medications were assessed for safety for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for medication self-administration. (Residents 31 and 14) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 4/2/25 at 3:09 p.m., a medication cup sat on Resident 31's bedside table. She indicated the cup contained applesauce and her medications. A large, red-colored pill and white colored pills were observed in the cup. The resident indicated the pills had to dissolve in the applesauce before she could swallow them. Staff left the medications with her because the pills took a long time to dissolve. Resident 31's clinical record was reviewed on 4/8/25 at 4:19 p.m. Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, heart failure, and acute kidney failure. Current physician's orders included levothyroxine sodium 75 micrograms (mcg) (thyroid medication), one tablet in the evening, gabapentin 100 mg (seizure or nerve pain medication), two capsules twice a day, mechanical soft diet,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor bowel movements and initiate the facility's bowel protocol for a resident with constipation for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for constipation. (Resident 40) Finding includes: During an interview on 4/7/25 at 1:57 p.m., Resident 40 indicated her bowels moved that day, but it was very hard. It had been about three days since her bowels last moved. She hoped the constipation was getting better. Resident 40's clinical record was reviewed on 4/7/25 at 4:34 p.m. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, constipation, generalized anxiety disorder, unspecified dementia, iron deficiency anemia, and difficulty walking. A current physician's order included bisacodyl rectal suppository 10 mg insert one suppository rectally as needed for constipation daily, An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/16/24, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, used a manual wheelchair, required set-up assistance for eating, toileting, and oral hygiene. She could walk 10 feet with supervision. The resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$22,071 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $12,038 — penalty dated 2024-06-07
• $10,033 — penalty dated 2024-04-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN