Bertha D Garten Ketcham Memorial Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 76 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 63.1 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.40 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.64 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent falls for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. Following falls, resident care plans were not updated with interventions to prevent further falls, and a resident's environment was not free of hazards, which resulted in a fall and leg fracture. (Resident C, Resident D) Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident C was completed on 2/26/25 at 11:15 A.M., Resident C's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fracture of lower end right femur, cellulitis of left lower limb, type II diabetes, morbid obesity, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, and overactive bladder. Resident C's most recent Significant Change Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/3/25, indicated the resident had no cognitive impairment, required substantial/maximal assistance with bathing (helper does more than half the effort), required supervision with transfers, had an indwelling catheter, and had no falls since the previous quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/3/24. Resident C's care plan included,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and visitors for 9 of 9 rooms tested for hot water. The water temperatures were above 120 degrees. (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER]/38, room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER]/34, room [ROOM NUMBER]/24, room [ROOM NUMBER]/26, room [ROOM NUMBER]/36, room [ROOM NUMBER]/12, room [ROOM NUMBER]/16).Findings include: 1.On 1/15/2026 at 10:44 A.M., the water temperature in the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER] (private room) was 126.8 degrees Fahrenheit.2. On 1/15/2026 at 10:50 A.M., the water temperature in the bathroom between Rooms 37/38 (bathroom shared with four residents) was 125.7 degrees Fahrenheit. The two residents in room [ROOM NUMBER] were cognitively impaired. The two residents in room [ROOM NUMBER] were cognitively impaired. 3. On 1/15/2026 at 10:53 A.M., the water temperature in the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER] (private room) was 126 degrees Fahrenheit. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0551 — isolated
  Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the correct resident representative of changes for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for guardianship. A resident deemed by the court to be incompetent, was appointed a guardian (resident's father) but the facility was contacting the father's wife (resident's stepmother) instead. (Resident 6)Finding includes:On 1/21/26 at 9:24 A.M., Resident 6 was observed laying in his bed. Resident made eye contact but gave no verbal responses. He was wearing a hospital gown and had a palm cushion in his right hand.On 1/16/26 at 12:54 P.M., Resident 6's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, rhabdomyolysis (a serious condition where damaged muscle tissue breaks down), traumatic brain injury (TBI), contracture of right hand, and persistive vegetative state.The most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/11/25, indicated Resident 6's cognitive status was unable to be assessed, and he was totally…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The filters on the oxygen concentrators were dusty. (Resident 27, Resident 9)Findings include:1.On 1/15/2026 at 11:42 A.M., Resident 27 was observed sitting in chair next to bed, wearing oxygen at 2 LPM (liters per minute) per nasal cannula. The filter on the oxygen condenser was observed to be dusty.On 1/16/2026 at 12:37 P.M., Resident 27 was observed lying in bed, call light within reach, wearing oxygen at 2 lpm (liters per minute) per nasal cannula. The filter on the oxygen condenser was observed to be dusty.On 1/20/2026 at 9:24 A.M., Resident 27 was observed lying in bed, watching tv, head of the bed elevated, wearing oxygen at 2 lpm (liters per minute) per nasal cannula. The filter on the oxygen condenser was observed to be dusty.On 1/16/2026 at 1:30 P.M., Resident 27's medical records were reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan included pertinent information regarding a newly admitted resident's health care needs for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for ostomy care. The baseline care plan included no mention of a newly acquired colostomy. (Resident B)Finding includes:A record review on 12/3/25 at 11:30 A.M., indicated Resident B's diagnoses included but were not limited to diverticulitis of the large intestine with perforation and abscess without bleeding and encounter for attention to colostomy (admission [DATE]). Resident B's most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/15/25, indicated the resident received pressure injury care, surgical wound care, and had an ostomy. Resident B's physician orders included but were not limited to change the stoma wafer and bag every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday (started 10/13/25), ostomy care daily: observe the stoma for peri-stomal skin breakdown and circulation. Check that the stoma is pink or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a person centered comprehensive care plan for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents. Resident's who were on an antiplatelet medication, a diuretic medication, EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions), contact isolation, and a fall did not have care plans developed or revised. (Resident 16, Resident 36, Resident 20) Findings include: 1. On 10/8/24 at 4:37 P.M., Resident 16's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Atrial Fibrillation, hypertension, and coronary artery disease. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 7/4/24 indicated Resident 16 received a diuretic medication. Physician Orders included, but were not limited to, hydrochlorothiazide tablet (diuretic) 25mg (milligrams), give 1 tablet a day for high blood pressure, start date 10/11/23. Resident 16's clinical record lacked a care plan for a diuretic. 2. On 10/7/24 at 10:15 A.M., Resident 36's clinical record was reviewed.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and the expiration date for 3 of 4 medication carts observed for medication storage and medications for multiple residents' morning medication pass were stored in medication cups with their names on them in the top left drawer of the medication cart for 1 of 4 medication carts observed during medication pass. (Medication Cart 3 on East Hall in the main building, Medication Cart in [NAME] House, Medication Cart in [NAME] House) Finding includes: 1. On 10/3/24 at 10:05 A.M., the following was observed in Medication Cart 3 on the East Hall in the main building: Resident 38's Refresh Tears 0.5% Eye drops and Olopatadine 0.1% Eye Drops, no open date Resident 14's Albuterol 90 mcg (microgram) Inhaler did not have an open date and Genteal Eye Drops with an open date of 12/15/23 Resident 40's Ventolin 90 mcg Inhaler, Genteal Eye Drops, and Anoro Elpta 62.5 -25 mg…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared safely in accordance with professional standards for food service for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. Foods were not labeled correctly and a used cooking utensil was dropped into the food to be served. Temperature and dishwasher logs were not filled out daily. (Daisy House, [NAME] House) Findings include: 1. On 10/3/24 at 10:26 A.M., the following was observed in the [NAME] House kitchen refrigerators: tomatoes in a Tupperware bowl-- undated and unlabeled 112 oz (ounce) can of milk chocolate pudding-- undated, unlabeled, and open to air 2. On 10/3/24 at 10:26 A.M., the following was observed in the [NAME] House kitchen freezers: chicken patty's-- undated and unlabeled diced chicken-- undated and unlabeled 3 clear glasses's with a frozen brown substance-- undated and unlabeled 2 bags of biscuits-- undated and unlabeled bag of vegetables-- undated and unlabeled [name of company] cup with brown substance-- undated and unlabeled hash browns-- undated, unlabeled, and open to air 3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify and consult the physician, resident, and/or resident's representative of changes that may require an alteration in the resident's care for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The physician, resident, and/or resident's representative were not notified of a resident's missed medication dose and a resident's weight loss. (Resident 4, Resident 15) Findings include: 1. On 10/8/24 at 9:28 A.M., Resident 4's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, hemiplegia left non-dominant side, and anxiety. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 9/15/24, indicated Resident 4's cognition was not able to be assessed, she was totally dependant on 2 staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and totally dependant on 1 staff for eating. Her height was 62 inches and her weight was 149 lbs (pounds). A current Nutritional Care Plan, revised 10/8/24, included, but was not limited to the following intervention: Keep my MD (Medical Doctor) and RD…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance devices were provided to prevent accidents for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls. A resident's care plan was not updated timely with a new intervention after her first fall and the resident fell again with the intervention not being in place at the time of the fall. (Resident 15) Finding includes: On 10/9/24 at 9:16 A.M., Resident 15 was observed sitting in the recliner in her room with oxygen on per nasal cannula and a pull tab alarm attached to her left shoulder. On 10/8/24 at 3:17 P.M. Resident 15's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behaviors, history of falling, and muscle weakness. The most recent Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 7/18/24, indicated Resident 15's cognition was severely impaired and an extensive assist of 2 staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, had 2 falls, and no alarms were used. Current Physician's Orders included, but were not limited to, the following: May have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving psychotropic medications were assessed for continued use of the medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A resident's antipsychotic medication was not decreased timely as recommended, and was increased with no indication. (Resident 15) Findings include: On 10/3/24 at 2:40 P.M., Resident 15 was observed sitting in a recliner with her eyes closed. On 10/9/24 at 9:00 A.M., Resident 15's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, dementia with behaviors, anxiety, and depression. The most recent Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 7/18/24, indicated a severe cognitive impairment, and required extensive assistance of two staff with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Resident 15 was currently taking an antipsychotic with the most recent GDR (Gradual Dose Reduction) on 1/5/24. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: olanzapine (Zyprexa) (an antipsychotic) 10mg (milligrams) one time a day…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported −$180K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN