Transcendent Healthcare Of Owensville

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 53.2 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.90 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.05 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-04-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective services were provided to prevent the development of a facility-acquired stage two pressure injuries for Resident 46 and Resident 9, who were admitted to the facility without pressure injuries, and were identified by the facility upon admission to be at risk to develop pressure injuries. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 46 developing a facility-acquired stage two pressure injury on the coccyx that deteriorated to an unstageable pressure injury with infection and required hospitalization for intravenous antibiotic therapy of wound-based sepsis, and surgical debridement of the facility-acquired unstageable pressure injury to a stage four pressure injury. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 9 developing a facility-acquired stage two pressure injury on the left heel that deteriorated to a stage three pressure injury. Findings include: 1. On 3/27/24 at 1:46 P.M., Resident 46's family member indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-04-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nutritional care and services including failure to identify significant weight loss, failure to notify the physician of poor intakes, and failure to be reviewed by the Registered Dietician, for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 46). This deficient practice resulted in the resident experiencing a 20% weight loss in 35 days, developing a facility-acquired stage two pressure injury on the 12/28/23 that deteriorated to an infected unstageable pressure injury, and requiring a hospitalization for sepsis, dehydration, and malnutrition. Finding includes: On 3/27/24 at 1:46 P.M., Resident 46's family member indicated they had not been notified by the facility about Resident 46's weight loss. They indicated the resident was hospitalized in January 2024 and they found out about the weight loss then. They indicated that Resident 46 was able to feed herself when she was admitted to the facility but had since declined and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices for 1 of 2 resident's observed for catheter care and during 2 of 3 observations of care. A residents catheter tubing was left dragging the floor following care, staff failed to don (put on) required personal protection equipment (PPE) for a resident in enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), and staff failed to perform hand hygiene between glove changes. (Resident D, Resident K)Findings include:1. During an observation on 1/7/26 at 10:20 A.M., signage hanging outside of Resident D's room indicated a resident in the room required EBP. During an observation on 1/7/25 at 11:25 A.M., Resident D was up in a wheelchair in his room. Resident D's catheter drainage bag was clipped to the wheelchair with the catheter tubing resting on the floor. CNA 4 donned gloves, knelt next to the resident's wheelchair, and emptied the catheter bag into a urinal. CNA 4 closed the catheter bag and disposed of the urine in the resident's restroom. CNA 4 then exited the resident's room with the catheter…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that annual influenza immunizations were offered to 2 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. Residents who had given consent to receive the influenza immunization had no record that they had received the immunization or that the immunization was medically contraindicated. (Resident D, Resident G)Findings include: 1. During record review on 1/7/26 at 12:50 P.M., Resident D's immunization consent form, signed and dated 7/16/25, indicated the resident gave consent to receive the influenza immunization.Resident D's immunization history indicated the resident's last influenza immunization was receivedon 10/27/21.Resident D's record contained no indication that the resident had received, refused, or was medically contraindicated to receive the influenza immunization during 2025.2. During record review on 1/7/26 at 10:30 A.M., Resident G's immunization consent form, signed and dated 10/30/25, indicated the resident gave consent to receive the influenza immunization.Resident G's immunization history indicated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-08 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen manager met required qualifications for 1 of 1 dietary manager qualifications reviewed. (Food Services Director) Finding includes: During an interview on 5/5/25 at 9:30 A.M., the Food Services Director (FSD) provided a document that indicated she had been enrolled in a food service manager class from [Program Title] since September 2024 and had not completed it. On 5/7/26 at 10:27 A.M., the employee record for the FSD was reviewed. It indicated she started her role as the FSD on 6/30/24. During an interview on 5/8/25 at 9:11 A.M., the FSD indicated she did not start the management course until September because she did not know which course to be enrolled in. On 5/8/25 at 10:49 A.M., the Regional Consultant Nurse provided a current, non-dated job description for the Director of Food Services that indicated the director was to provide leadership training that includes the administrative and supervisory principles essential of the Food Services Department .

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received consistent implementation of interventions to prevent falls for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents related to falls. Fall interventions were observed out of place. (Resident 6, Resident 28, Resident 46, and Resident 45) Findings include: 1. On 5/5/25 at 1:26 P.M., Resident 6's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fracture of the lower end of left radius. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 3/13/25, indicated Resident 6 was cognitively intact, required partial to moderate assistance of staff (staff does less than half of the effort) for transferring and toileting, and had one fall with major injury since the prior assessment. A current risk for falls care plan, last revised on 3/5/25, included the following interventions: Anticipate and meet the resident's needs, dated 9/9/19 Be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, labeled, and dated properly in accordance with professional standards for food service for 1 of 2 kitchen observations. (Kitchen) Finding includes: On 5/4/25 at 9:23 A.M., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following items were observed: In the reach-in freezer: 1 container of butter oil with no open date 4 premade lunches with no preparation date or open date Spice Cabinet: 1 container of oil with no open date 1 container of pumpkin spice with no open date 1 container of ground mustard with no open date 1 container of white pepper with no open date 1 container of spray cooking oil with no open date 1 container of basil with no open date 1 container of garlic powder with no open date 2 containers of parsley flakes with no open date 1 container of thyme with no open date 1 container of mild chili powder with no open date 1 container of onion powder with no open date 1 container of dill weed with no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff promoted dignity by allowing a resident to use the bathroom when requested for 1 of 1 dining observations. (Resident 18) Finding includes: On 5/4/25 at 12:16 P.M., Resident 18 was observed in the dining room. Resident 18 told Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 9 she needed to go pee. CNA 9 told Resident 18 she could not go to the bathroom because she had to eat. On 5/6/25 at 8:44 A.M., Resident 18's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 18 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 4/8/25, indicated Resident 18 was severely cognitively impaired, required supervision from staff while eating, and substantial assistance (staff does more than half of the work) for toileting, bathing, and transfers. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Lasix oral tablet (a diuretic medication) - Give 20 mg (milligrams) by mouth one time a day…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan conferences were completed quarterly for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 27) and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wound care (Resident 14). Findings include: 1. On 5/6/25 at 9:14 A.M., Resident 27's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 27 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 3/21/25, indicated Resident 27 was moderately cognitively impaired and required substantial assistance (staff does more than half of the work) for toileting, bathing, and transfers. On 5/6/25 at 9:14 A.M., the clinical record lacked a care plan conference held since 1/15/25. On 5/6/25 at 9:35 A.M., care plan conferences held in 2025 were requested. On 5/7/25 at 10:55 A.M., the Regional Consultant provided a Care Plan Conference Summary, with a completion date 5/6/25 at 12:20 P.M., that indicated a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents that were self-administering medications were assessed for capability to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 residents observed with medications in their room. (Resident 203) Finding includes: On 5/4/25 at 10:51 A.M., Resident 203 was observed in his recliner with a bottle of Tums on his bedside table. On 5/5/25 at 10:14 A.M., Resident 203 was observed in his recliner with a bottle of Tums on his bedside table. On 5/6/25 at 10:18 A.M., Resident 203's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cellulitis, diabetes mellitus, and obesity. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was still in progress and indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Sections regarding medication and functional abilities had not been completed. Physician orders lacked an order for Tums and a self-administration of medication order. The comprehensive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for wound treatment, labs were obtained prior to antibiotic use, and antibiotics were administered for the duration ordered for 1 of 3 Residents reviewed for wound treatments. (Resident 14) Finding includes: On 5/4/25 at 11:02 A.M., Resident was observed with bilateral feet wrapped with brown bandages over white gauze, no shoes or socks on, and feet directly on the ground. On 5/5/25 at 2:21 P.M., Resident 14's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 14 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 2/27/25, indicated Resident 14 was moderately cognitively impaired and required supervision from staff for eating, toileting, bathing, and transfers. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Cleanse bilateral lower extremities (BLE) with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply oil…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed during wound treatment for 1 of 3 Residents reviewed for wound treatments. (Resident 14) Finding includes: On 5/4/25 at 11:02 A.M., Resident was observed with bilateral feet wrapped with brown bandages over white gauze, no shoes or socks on, and feet directly on the ground. On 5/5/25 at 2:21 P.M., Resident 14's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 14 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 2/27/25, indicated Resident 14 was moderately cognitively impaired and required supervision from staff for eating, toileting, bathing, and transfers. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Cleanse bilateral lower extremities (BLE) with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply oil emulsion to top of foot, wrap with Kerlix (an absorbent gauze) from toes to below knees,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,036 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-04-02
• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-04-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 36% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN