Lutheran Community Home
111 W Church Ave, Seymour, IN 47274 · Non profit - Corporation · 95 certified beds · (812) 522-5927 Medicare & Medicaid certified
On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 29.4% | 11.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.2% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 6.4% | 1.1% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.6% | 25.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.3% | 3.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 26.0% | 11.9% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.8% | 23.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.5% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.0% | 3.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.1% | 23.3% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.2% | 13.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 1.2% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.5% | 79.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.7% | 22.2% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.4% | 10.8% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.07 | 1.61 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.88 | 1.44 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
65.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 72.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 65.5%CMS range 57.6–75.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 6.9–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 72.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 72.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 75.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 70.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 3.6–13.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.08 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 76.4 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.96 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.26 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.17 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.75 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician and document physician's ongoing guidance for 1 of 19 resident records reviewed for notification of change. (Resident 4) Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 4 was reviewed on 12/03/2025 at 2:33 P.M. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/23/2025, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fractures of the tibia, hypertension, renal failure, seizure disorder, anxiety, and depression. The resident's Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) indicated the resident had the following physician orders:-Daily weight for chronic kidney disease, with a start date of 10/18/2025, and a discontinued date of 10/27/2025, and-Furosemide tablet 40 milligrams (mg), administer 1 tablet, once a day as needed for weight gain of two pounds or more in 24 hours and/or bilateral lower extremity swelling, with a start date of 10/18/2025. The resident did not receive the prescribed, as needed, Furosemide medication on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to protect residents' personal health information for 2 of 4 observations conducted. Findings included 1. The 200 Hall was observed on 12/04/2025 at 10:23 A.M. Two Medication Carts were sitting in the hallway across from the nurse's station both. Both medication carts were unattended. One Medication Cart had an empty medication card laying on the top labeled with Resident 32's name. The medication was Losartan Potassium 100 milligrams (mg). A second Medication Cart had an empty medication card laying on the top labeled with Resident 40's name. The medication was Losartan HCTZ (Hydrochlorothiazide). No staff members were in the immediate area or near the medication carts. Two unidentified people walked past the cart. At 10:27 A.M., a staff member took the medication card for Resident 40 from the top of the medication cart, tore the top half of the card off, and disposed of the rest of the card. 2. The 200 Hall was observed on 12/05/2025 at 9:04 A.M. The medication cart was unattended at the time of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to document residents' meal consumption for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Residents 84, 4, and 72) Findings include: 1.The clinical record for Resident 84 was reviewed on 12/04/2025 at 11:57 A.M. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/02/2025, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, expressive language disorder, aphasia (a partial or total loss of language skills due to brain damage), diabetes, and dementia. The resident had complaints of pain or difficulty with swallowing or eating and was on a mechanically altered diet. The resident's current Nutritional Status Care Plan indicated she was at risk for impaired nutritional status and listed an Approach to monitor and record meal intakes, with a start date of 10/29/2025. The resident's Meal Consumption Record lacked documentation of meals for the following dates and times: -On 11/03/2025 at breakfast and lunch, -On 11/05/2025 at dinner, -On 11/06/2025 at breakfast and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provided physician prescribed medications and appropriate dosage for 2 of 19 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Residents 4 and 3) Findings include:1.The clinical record for Resident 4 was reviewed on 12/03/2025 at 2:33 P.M. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/23/2025, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fractures of the tibia, hypertension, renal failure, seizure disorder, anxiety, and depression. The Progress Notes indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 5:20 P.M. The resident's Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) indicated they did not receive the following prescribed medication; Lacosamide 100 milligrams (mg) for seizures, with a start date of 10/17/2025:s on the following dates and times: -On 10/17/2025 at 7:00 P.M. to 10:00 P.M., due to medication being unavailable. -On 10/18/2025 at 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 A.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain medication storage areas appropriately related to undated medication and a staff member's personal items for 1 of 4 medication carts reviewed (300 Hall Medication Cart), and a resident's personal items for 1 of 3 medication rooms reviewed (300 Hall Medication Room). Findings included:1.Medication storage areas on the 300 Hall were observed on 12/04/2025 at 10:46 A.M., With RN 2, and included, but were not limited to, the following: a. The 300 Hall Medication Cart contained a Lispro insulin pen for Resident 92 that was not labeled with an open date. The RN indicated the pen had not been opened yet, it had been out of the refrigerator since Friday, 11/28/2025, and she would date the pen when she opened it. The pen was good for 28 days. Usually, it was the same day, when a pen was removed from the refrigerator and when it was opened. An insulated coffee cup with a lid was in a drawer of the medication cart sitting next to clean health care supplies. The RN identified the coffee cup as being their own. b. In the 300…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update Care Plans related to behaviors and monitoring alert systems for 2 of 3 residents' Care Plans reviewed. (Residents C and D)Findings include:1.The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 10/23/2025 at 10:39 A.M. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/03/2025, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia, anemia, and hypertension. The resident had physical and verbal behavior symptoms for 4 to 6 days of the assessment period. A Progress Note, dated 08/28/2025 at 5:56 P.M., indicated Resident B had wandered into Resident C's bedroom. Resident C had asked the resident to leave and when the other resident did not leave, Resident C smacked at the resident's face. A Progress Note, dated 10/06/2025 at 10:57 A.M., indicated Resident C was stating that another female resident ambulated up to this resident to slap me across the face. Resident C was sitting with staff completing an activity at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide perineal care in an appropriate manner for a resident with a history of UTIs (Urinary Tract Infections) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for UTIs. ( Resident 55) Findings include: During an interview on 09/05/24 at 12:55 P.M., Resident 55 indicated she had recently been tested for a UTI and was unsure if the facility had started them on an antibiotic. When being toileted, the resident indicated some of the staff members cleaned them well, and some did not. Morning care for the resident was observed on 09/12/24 at 9:39 A.M. CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) 2 gathered clean linens from a linen closet in a common hallway and entered the resident's room. The CNA assisted the resident from her bed to the bathroom, donned gloves, removed their brief, helped the resident to sit on the toilet, removed her gloves, and gave the resident a moment to use the toilet. The CNA used hand sanitizer then went out into the resident's room to gather clothes for the day and reentered the bathroom. The CNA donned gloves, wet a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered to prevent significant medication errors for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medications. (Resident 10) Findings include: Resident 10's clinical record was reviewed on 09/13/24 at 10:38 A.M. An Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 07/12/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, psychotic disorder, epilepsy, and dementia. The resident's February 2024 EMAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record) included, but was not limited to, the following medication orders: - A physician's order, with a start date of 09/28/22 and an end date of 04/29/24, to administer two 50 mg (milligram) chewable phenytoin (an anti-seizure medication) tablets twice a day (once between 7:00 A.M. and 10:00 A.M., and then again between 7:00 P.M. and 10:00 P.M.). - A physician's order, with a start date of 09/28/22 that was discontinued on 02/16/24, to administer one half (25 mg) of a 50 mg chewable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper application of an orthotic device for a resident with a contracture (Resident 16) and failed to provide restorative nursing services for residents with limited range of motion (Residents 60 and 64) for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for limited range of motion. Findings include: 1. Resident 16 was observed on 07/18/23 at 11:31 A.M. The resident was in her wheelchair in front of the television. A neck pillow was in place. The resident's right hand was closed as though it was contracted. There was no splint or brace device in use. The resident was observed in her room in bed on 07/18/23 at 2:10 P.M. The resident was awake and moving her thumb and fingers on her left hand. The resident's right hand was closed and there was no splint device in place. The resident was observed in the common area in front of the television on 07/20/23 at 10:30 A.M. A neck pillow was in place. The resident's right hand was closed. The index and middle fingers of the resident's left hand were extended. There was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. The clinical record for Resident 64 was reviewed on 07/20/23 at 10:25 A.M. A Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 06/07/23, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, obstructive uropathy, Alzheimer's disease, depression. A Fall Event, dated 06/06/23, indicated the resident had an unwitnessed fall in his room. The resident was sitting on the side of his bed with his breakfast. The resident's legs were wrapped in his blanket, and he was sitting on the floor with his back against the bed. He denied hitting his head and was able to move all extremities. No injuries were noted. An IDT Note, dated 06/06/23 at 4:55 P.M., indicated the resident had a fall on 06/06/23 at 8:30 A.M. An intervention to prevent further falls was to place non-skid strips to the floor of the right side of the bed. The Complete Care Plan was provided by the DON on 07/21/23 at 3:13 P.M. The care plan included, but was not limited to, falls with a start date of 10/24/22. The intervention, with a start date of 06/06/23, indicated the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control guidelines related to indwelling urinary catheter care for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for urinary catheters and Urinary Tract Infections. (Residents 64 and 76) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 07/19/23 at 10:12 A.M., Resident 64 was at the end of a hallway, sitting in his wheelchair. His indwelling urinary catheter tubing was dragging the floor. During an observation on 07/19/23 at 1:38 P.M., the resident was sitting at the dining room table. The resident's indwelling urinary catheter tubing was resting on the floor. During an observation on 07/20/23 at 1:57 P.M., QMA (Qualified Medication Aide) 12 propelled the resident from the dining room to the common area in front of the TV. The indwelling urinary catheter tubing was dragging the floor. During an observation and interview on 07/24/23 at 11:36 A.M., the resident was sitting in the common area with his indwelling urinary catheter tubing resting on the floor under the resident's foot. QMA 8 indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store medications appropriately related following manufacturer's guidelines, labeling medication, and having unsecured loose tablets in the medication carts for 4 of 5 medication carts reviewed. (Medication Carts One and Two on the 100 Hall, and Medication Carts One and Two on the 200 Hall) Findings include: 1. The 100 Hall Medication Carts were observed on 07/18/23 at 10:20 A.M., with RN 2. Cart One contained the following items and loose pills laying in the bottom of drawers: - an Albuterol inhaler with a spacer attached, laying on its side in the bottom drawer for Resident 11, - three small white oval tablets, - one medium white oval tablet, - one small white round tablet, and - one medium pink round tablet. Cart Two contained the following items and loose pills laying in the bottom of drawers: - a Fluticasone inhaler laying on its side in a box for Resident 65, - a box of cornstarch with the top of the box open, the powder cornstarch visible, with a plastic spoon sticking up out of the cornstarch powder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-25 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow a physician's recommendation related to a urinalysis for 1 of 19 residents reviewed for laboratory services. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 64 was reviewed on 07/20/23 at 10:25 A.M. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 06/07/23, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, obstructive uropathy, Alzheimer's disease, and depression. A Psychiatry Progress Note, dated 06/06/23, indicated the resident was sitting in his room. Per the nursing staff, the resident had not displayed any sadness or tearfulness. He had decreased agitation but continued to to be restless and had multiple falls trying to get up unassisted. The resident had some nights where he was awake and not sleeping. His appetite seemed fair. He was having increased aggression and inappropriate sexual behaviors. The assessment and plan, included but was not limited to, .Recent UTI (Urinary Tract Infection): Recommend rechecking a Urinalysis [UA] to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JACKSON COUNTY SCHNECK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2012 |
| LUTHERAN COMMUNITY HOME, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/01/2012 |
| BEVERS, SUSAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2020 |
| FISH, ERIC | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/01/2020 |
| GILLILAND, TERRENCE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2012 |
| HARPE, BRANDON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2020 |
| KLEBER, COURTNEY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2020 |
| MANN, DEBORAH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/10/2014 |
| MARKEL, ANDREW | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2020 |
| MCCORY, JACK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2012 |
| REEDY, MATTHEW | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2012 |
| SMITH, RICK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2012 |
| STOREY, MARC | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| CARTER, ANITA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/27/1999 |
| FLEETWOOD, KARYN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/20/2007 |
| HILL, NEIL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/09/2018 |
| JUNG, MATTHEW | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/28/2018 |
| KRUMME, GALEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/1996 |
| MEYER, GARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/23/2017 |
| NOLTING, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/25/2012 |
| POLLERT, MAX | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/24/2014 |
| POLLERT, ROGER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/16/2021 |
| ROTHERT, ERIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/24/2023 |
| SCHNITKER, SUSAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/22/2007 |
| VOELKER, LOUIS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/1994 |
| WISCHMEIER, HENRY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/26/2015 |
| WISCHMEIER, PRISCILLA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/23/2017 |
| WISCHMEIER, ROGER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/24/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 57 rows in the source record cover these 28 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155715. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.