No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Especially Kidz Health & Rehab

2325 S Miller St, Shelbyville, IN 46176 · Government - County · 130 certified beds · (317) 392-3287 Medicaid only — no Medicare

Call the home — (317) 392-3287 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Feb 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2024
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (20) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
150 W Washington St Ste 250 · (317) 882-4288 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1412 Miller Ave · (317) 421-2020 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1007 State St · (317) 392-5846 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2609 Berwick Dr · (317) 392-5128 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2535 S Miller St · (317) 408-6004

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.5%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.8%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.4%0.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%25.2%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.9%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened51.7%11.9%16.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication62.6%23.5%18.9%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.5%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control1.0%23.3%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.6%13.6%17.1%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.761.611.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.991.441.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.05U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
<0.01hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 50% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.36
RN hours/ resident / day
1.01
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.73
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.09
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
37.3%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 112.2 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.73 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.26 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-21)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-02)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely clarify vital signs parameters of a physician's order for 1 of 5 residents reviewed quality of care (Resident 50).Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 50 was reviewed on 5/20/26 at 10:51 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, ventricular tachycardia (lower chambers of the heart beats too fast to pump blood effectively) and hypertension (pressure in the blood vessels is too high).On 2/18/26, the physician prescribed midodrine 5 milligram (mg) (treatment for high blood pressure) every 8 hours, to be held for blood pressure greater than 120.A care plan, last reviewed 5/13/26, indicated the resident had a diagnosis of hypertension and was at risk for associated complications. The goal was for the resident to have no signs or symptoms of hypertension. The care plan included an intervention to administer medications as ordered by the physician.The April and May 2026 MAR indicated Resident 50 had received midodrine 5 mg when his systolic blood pressure was above 120 on the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control was maintained by not donning a gown during a wound dressing change when a resident was on enhanced barrier precautions (Resident103) and touching a residents medication tablets with bare hands (Resident 45) for 2 of 5 residents for infection control. Findings include:1.The clinical record for Resident 103 was reviewed on 5/18/26 at 11:45 a.m. The diagnoses included but were not limited to: hypertension (elevated blood pressure). An observation was made of Resident 103's entrance to his room. There was an Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) sign taped on the window of room. The EBP sign indicated Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) required for high contact areas was gown and gloves. The examples included but were not limited to: wound care. An observation on 5/19/26 at 3:20 p.m., of a wound dressing change was made for Resident 103's wound that was located on the back of his head with the Assisted Director of Nursing (ADON) and License Practical Nurse (LPN) 3 on 5/19/26 at 3:23 p.m. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a staff member administered medications as ordered by the physician and did not falsify resident records for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for medication receipt. (Residents E, F, G, and Licensed Practical Nurse 3) This deficient practice was corrected on 7-9-25, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. The facility implemented a systemic plan that included the following actions: in-service education to nursing staff related to the policies and procedures regarding safe medication administration and prompt reporting of any resident or staff concerns to management, conducted a review of residents medication orders, narcotic orders and correct narcotic counts, observations of medication administrations and dismissal of Licensed Practical Nurse 3, with ongoing review presented to the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee for review. Findings include:In an interview with the Executive Director (ED) on 9-16-25 at 12:30 p.m., she indicated on the afternoon of 7-4-25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure unopened food in the freezer was stored properly. This had the potential to affect 24 of 114 residents that receive food from the kitchen. Findings include: The facility kitchen was observed with Dietary Supervisor (DS) 6 on 3/31/25 at 10:15 a.m. During the tour, the walk-in freezer was observed with the following items not closed/secured: One box of tater tots, Two boxes of mixed vegetables, and One box of pork patties, An interview was conducted with DS 6 on 3/31/25 at 10:30 a.m. She indicated the box of tater tots, the mixed vegetables, and the pork patties should have been stored preventing air from reaching the product. A storage guidelines policy was provided by DS 6 on 3/31/25 at 11:00 a.m. It indicated, . Frozen items that are not individually wrapped such as cookie dough, biscuits, vegetables, fruit and meat should be placed in a 2-gallon storage bag or wrapped tightly in plastic wrap prior to returning to original box. All open boxes in the freezer must be resealed to prevent damage from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control was maintained by utilizing hand hygiene during medication administration for 4 of 5 residents observed during medication administration. (Residents' 26, 38, 49, and 81) Findings include: 1. An observation was conducted of medication administration with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 5 for Resident 81 on 4/1/25 at 8:40 a.m. LPN 5 prepared the resident's medication at the medication cart. LPN 5 utilized hand sanitizer and donned gloves. After, she touched the medication cart, the computer mouse, the narcotic box, and the medication cards with her gloved hands. During that time, she pulled the medication cards from the medication cart popping the resident's pill medications in her gloved hands and dropping the pill medications in the medication cup. She then crushed the pill medications. At that time, LPN 5 indicated the resident was receiving her pill medications through a gastrostomy tube (g-tube; a tube inserted in stomach to receive liquid food and medications). After, LPN 5 doffed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for homelike environment. (Residents 17, 30, 111, and 115) Findings include: 1. An observation was conducted of Resident 111's room on 3/31/25 at 10:50 a.m. There was a box fan facing her bed that was observed dusty with the left side of the fan missing a cover and exposing the fan blade. The blinds in Resident 111's room were broken with missing pieces to where spaces were left when the blinds were closed. An observation was conducted of Resident 111's room on 4/1/25 at 12:06 p.m. The box fan still contained dust and had the missing cover that exposed the fan blade. The blinds remained broken with missing pieces. 2. An observation was conducted of Resident 30's room on 3/31/25 at 11:08 a.m. There were broken blinds with missing pieces to where spaces were left when the blinds were closed. An observation was conducted of Resident 30's room on 4/1/25 at 12:06 p.m. The blinds remained broken with missing pieces. 3. An observation was conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist a resident with getting out of bed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for choices and to ensure residents requiring assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) receive adequate assistance with oral care. (Resident 22, Resident 21 and Resident 85) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 22 was reviewed on 3/31/25 at 11:45 a.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral palsy, profound intellectual disabilities, epilepsy, organic brain syndrome, spastic quadriparesis, and wound infection. The 3/6/25 Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment indicated she was moderately, cognitively impaired. She had unclear speech but was usually understood with difficulty communicating some words or finishing thoughts, but was able, if prompted or given time. She sometimes understood others. Her hearing was adequate. She had upper and lower extremity impairment on both sides. She was dependent on staff for transfers from the bed to a chair. She used a wheelchair and was unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided activities for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for activities. (Resident 71) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 71 was reviewed on 3/31/25 at 2:00 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, traumatic brain injury and quadriplegia (partial or complete paralysis of both the arms and legs). An activities care plan, revision date of 1/23/25, indicated Resident 71 may benefit from activities for cognitive, social and sensory stimulation. Activities to include, but not limited to music, sensory stimulation, stories, tv, and massage. TV/Music will be on in room while awake as tolerated . An observation was conducted of Resident 71 in his room on 3/31/25 at 11:15 a.m. The resident was in bed with his eyes open. The resident's television was not turned on nor was any music playing. An interview was conducted with Resident 71's Representative on 3/31/25 at 2:36 p.m. She indicated she visited the resident on Sundays. The resident was observed on those days in bed. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's wheelchair had the necessary head support equipment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for positioning (Resident 20). Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 20 was reviewed on 4/2/25 at 11:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy (impaired movements characterized by paralysis of both arms and both legs, with muscle stiffness), neuromuscular scoliosis (irregular curving of the spine), and epilepsy (seizure disorder). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/23/24, indicated Resident 20 had impairments with his upper and lower extremities. A current care plan titled Adaptive Wheelchair, last reviewed on 3/20/25, noted Resident requires the use of an adaptive wheelchair 2° [secondary] to the inability to maintain proper body positioning and alignment. A current care plan titled Adaptive Wheelchair - Manual, last reviewed on 12/31/24, noted, The following adaptations may include any or all of the following .Standard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-23 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse containers were in good condition and waste was properly contained in dumpsters with lids or otherwise covered. This affected 116 of 116 residents in the facility. Findings include: An observation of the outside dumpster area of the facility was made on 2/21/24 at 3:17 p.m. There was a set of 2 gray dumpsters on one side of the dumpster area. The gray dumpster on the right had an open side door. There was a set of 2 green recycling bins on another side of the dumpster area. The top left lid of the recycling bin on the left was not covering the dumpster. The recycling bin on the right had a piece of cardboard sticking out of the front of the bin and one of the top lids was open. An environmental tour of the facility was conducted with the AED (Assistant Executive Director,) Environmental Manger, and Maintenance Director on 2/23/24 at 11:35 a.m. During the tour an observation of the outside dumpster area was made. The 2 gray dumpsters were both full of trash and both top lids on both…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 10 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure beard covers were worn in the kitchen and properly store food in the refrigerator. This had the potential to affect 21 of 116 residents in the facility. Findings include: A tour of the kitchen was conducted with the DM (Dietary Manager) on 2/20/24 at 11:10 a.m. During the tour, a preparation refrigerator was observed with an open container of prune juice with no lid on one of the shelves. The DM informed DA (Dietary Aide) 8 that the prune juice needed a lid. DA 8 proceeded to dump the remaining contents of the open container of prune juice into a pitcher. DA 8 then filled another pitcher with water. The DM stopped DA 8 to question what he was doing and informed him the prune juice was ready to serve, as it was not concentrated, and that he needed to read the label. DA 8 had a beard an was not wearing a beard cover. An interview was conducted with the DM after the above prune juice observation. She indicated the prune juice needed a lid while stored in the refrigerator to protect it from any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' heating/cooling unit in their room was properly affixed to the wall and that temperatures were set and maintained between 71 and 81 degrees Fahrenheit for 2 of 116 residents in the facility. (Residents E and CC) Findings include: An observation of Resident E's and CC's room was made on 2/20/24 at 2:58 p.m. The cover to the room's heating/cooling unit was resting on the floor not affixed to the wall. The small door to access the temperature controls on the cover had a lock on it. The unit was set to 65 degrees. An environmental tour of the facility was conducted with the AED (Assistant Executive Director,) Environmental Manager, and Maintenance Director on 2/23/24 at 11:35 a.m. During the tour an observation of Resident E's and CC's heating/cooling unit was made in their room. The unit cover remained on the floor, not affixed to the wall. The Maintenance Director picked up the cover and snapped it back into place. An interview was conducted with the Maintenance Director during the above…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical contact by staff member for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident 80) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 80 was reviewed on 2/23/24 at 3:44 p.m. Resident 80's diagnoses included, but not limited to, chronic respiratory failure, chronic lung disease, congenital malformations of the brain-cerebral ventriculomegaly (enlarged brain ventricles). A reportable incident to the Indiana Department of Health dated 1/27/24 indicated, a nursing school instructor, contacted the facility's DON (Director of Nursing) with a concern of a resident allegation of abuse. The immediate action taken was per facility protocol employee was suspended pending investigation. Nurse on the unit assessed resident for any signs/symptoms of redness, swelling, behavioral issues. The follow-up dated 1/30/24 indicated, 1/27/24 DON receives a text from [sic, name of Nursing School] RN [registered nurse] instructor that herself and three of her students witnessed the RT [sic, respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for restraints. (Resident 80) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 80 was reviewed on 2/20/22 at 3:00 p.m. The diagnosis for Resident 80 included, but was not limited to, respiratory failure. The matrix that includes resident assessments was provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 2/20/24 at 12:01 p.m. It indicated Resident 80 utilized restraints. Observations were made of Resident 80 on 2/20/24 at 3:21 p.m., and 2/22/24 at 11:59 a.m. The resident was observed in a wheelchair with a chest harness, lap belt and lap tray. The resident was able to move around in wheelchair. During interview with the DON on 2/22/24 at 2:06 p.m., she indicated Resident 80 was not in a restraint. The lap tray was not preventing the resident from moving around. If the lap tray was removed the resident's movement would be the same. The MDS was coded inaccurately. The facility does not have a policy regarding accuracy of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit an updated Level 1 PASRR (pre-admission screening resident review) assessment for a resident with a significant change in her mental health for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for PASRR. (Resident Y) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 25 was reviewed on 2/22/24 at 1:30 p.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizo-affective disorder. The 10/5/17 PASRR indicated there were no known mental health behaviors which affected interpersonal interactions, and there were no known recent or current mental health symptoms. It indicated she was on 1200 mg a day of Quetiapine (antipsychotic medication,) but a diagnosis was not indicated and her anxiety disorder was described in the medical record as 'very mild.' The 10/5/17 Notice of PASRR Level II Outcome Nursing Facility Approval notice read, If you experience a significant change in your physical or mental health, you may need a new Level II evaluation. The nursing facility must submit an updated Level I screening to Ascend to see if further PASRR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to clarify physician treatment orders for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for skin conditions. (Resident 36) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 36 was reviewed on 2/21/22 at 3:00 p.m. The diagnosis for Resident 36 included, but was not limited to, quadriplegic. A physician order dated 10/31/23 indicated staff to apply abdominal pad to the labia (inner skin folds to protect urethra and vagina). A physician order dated 11/17/22 indicated, do not use packaged wipes, use only warm water wash cloths to cleanse peri area. A physician order dated 2/22/23 indicated, Cleanse open area with vashe. Apply collagen powder and alginate rope with silver qs [every shift] and prn [as needed]. During an observation of a wound dressing change for Resident 36 with License Practical Nurse (LPN) 7 and Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) 6 on 2/23/24 at 1:37 p.m., the resident had stooled during that time. LPN 7 was observed utilizing disposable wipes to cleanse the resident. After the wound dressing was complete, LPN 7 was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received care to prevent a pressure ulcer and received the necessary services to promote the healing of a pressure ulcer by not dressing the wound as per physician's orders for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident 38) and failed to ensure a resident's foam boots were applied for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for limited range of motion (Resident 42). Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 38 was reviewed on 2/23/24 at 9:41 a.m. Resident 38's diagnoses included, but not limited to, spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy (a permanent neuromuscular disorder), dependence on a ventilator, epilepsy, and profound intellectual disabilities. A Wound Evaluation and Management Summary dated 1/17/24 indicated, Resident 38 had a right lower extremity wound present. The focused wound exam for site 2 (described as unstageable DTI, deep tissue injury, to the right anterior first toe) indicated, the etiology was pressure. At the time of the assessment, it had been present greater…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility to ensure adequate supervision for a resident with the ability to move by scooting from making contact with a mop water bucket for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accidents. (Resident 85) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 85 was reviewed on 2/21/24 at 10:10 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic respiratory failure, tracheostomy status, aphasia, intellectual disabilities, and global development delay. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/17/24, indicated resident was rarely/never understood regarding mental status. There were marked impairments on both lower extremities, utilization of a walker, partial/moderate assistance with sitting to standing, partial/moderate assistance with walking 10 feet, dependent for toileting, dependent for bathing, and dependent for personal hygiene. A care plan for activities of daily living (ADLs), updated 2/20/24, indicated the following, delayed milestones .Res [resident] able to move by scooting [noted 11/6/23 and 1/22/24]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed regarding tube feedings for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for feeding tubes. (Resident 85 and Resident 115) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 85 was reviewed on 2/21/24 at 10:10 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic respiratory failure, tracheostomy status, aphasia, intellectual disabilities, and global development delay. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/17/24, indicated resident was rarely/never understood regarding mental status and a feeding tube was utilized. A care plan for tube feeding, updated 1/22/24, indicated the following, The resident requires to be fed via enteral tube for nutrition/hydration .Interventions .Administer tube feeding as ordered A physician order, dated 11/2/23, was noted for tube feeding (Peptamen [NAME]); 180 milliliters per gastric tube with instructions to run via pump at 60 milliliters an hour twice a day at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for a resident with major depressive disorder with psychotic features and anxiety for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for behavioral/emotional health. (Resident 99) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 99 was reviewed on 2/22/24 at 1:43 p.m. Resident 99's diagnoses included, but not limited to, Duchenne muscular dystrophy (inherited disorder of progressive muscular weakness), congestive heart failure, dependence on a respirator, hypertension, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder with severe psychotic symptoms. Resident 99's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 12/1/23 indicated, he was cognitively intact. A Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) level II dated 12/9/21 indicated, Resident 99 was approved for Long Term Approval with Specialized Services. A related condition was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 15A011. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next