No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Healthwin Health & Rehabilitation

20531 Darden Rd, South Bend, IN 46637 · For profit - Corporation · 145 certified beds · (574) 272-0100 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (574) 272-0100 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Feb 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (75%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
19567 Cleveland Road
Pharmacy
52482 Indiana State Route 933 · (574) 271-0357 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Meijer1.1 mi
3600 Portage Ave · (574) 273-3400 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Wheelock Park · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.5%11.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.8%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.3%1.1%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms37.3%25.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.9%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened29.9%11.9%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.7%23.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.0%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.9%3.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.4%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.7%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.8%79.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.8%22.2%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.7%10.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.101.611.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.571.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 234 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

63.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
61.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 61.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 57 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF63.5%CMS range 56.9–68.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.1%CMS range 6.6–12.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge61.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge57.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge59.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified89.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting79.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 4.3–10.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.731.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.88
RN hours/ resident / day
0.87
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.49
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.24
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.62
RN hoursweekends
74.6%
Total nursing turnover
67.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 145 beds and averages 89.4 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 56 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.24 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.88 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.52 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 75% is well above the national median of 45%. 4 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-22)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-19)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure, two of three residents, reviewed for falls were provided safe transfer assistance. This deficient practice resulted in significant injuries for both residents which required transfers to acute care centers for treatment. (Residents E and G) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed, on 9/21/2023 at 11:49 A.M. Resident E was admitted to the facility, on 10/16/2022, with diagnosis including, but not limited to: paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes mellitus, asthma, sleep apnea, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, depression, dizziness and giddiness, insomnia, hemiparesis dominant side following cerebral vascular accident and anxiety disorder. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed on 9/11/2023 indicated the resident was alert and oriented and required the extensive assist of two staff for bed mobility, transfers and toilet use. The resident was non…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food at a palatable temperature for 1 of 4 nursing units. (West unit) This potentially affected 20 of 86 residents who ate food prepared in the kitchen. During an observation and temperature check of supper trays from a covered food cart, on the [NAME] 2 unit, on 4/21/2026 at 6:02 P.M., food was not served at a palatable temperature and the following temperatures were obtained:-the pureed grilled cheese was served at 125 degrees Fahrenheit.-the mashed potatoes and gravy was served at 128 degrees Fahrenheit.During an interview on 4/21/2026 at 6:02 P.M., the Dietary Director indicated the food should have been 135 degrees (Fahrenheit) at the point of service.On 4/22/2026 at 3:00 P.M. an undated policy titled, Food Preparation and Service was provided by the DON. The policy indicated, .potentially hazardous food must be maintained below 41 degrees or above 135 degrees 410 IAC 16.2-3.1-21(a)(2)

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in a sanitary manner for 1 of 1 kitchens. This deficient practice potentially affected 82 out 86 residents who ate food prepared in the kitchen. During an initial tour and observation of the kitchen on 4/15/2026 at 9:42 A.M. with the Dietary Director (DD) the following was noted:-a bag of frozen chicken strips and french fries were in the reach-in freezer opened and unsealed.-a baking tray put away as clean had bottom part of the tray covered in a brown substance-a fan in the dry storage area had visible dusty and grime-a silverware caddy had a brown sticky substance on it-white metal shelves above the food prep area had chipped paint and rust on them During an interview on 4/15/2026 at 9:42 A.M., the DD indicated the bags of chicken and french fries in the freezer should have been sealed, the baking tray should have been clean, the fan in the dry storage should have been clean, the silverware caddy should have been clean, and the metal shelves should have been painted. During another…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-22 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure bugs were controlled in 1 of 1 kitchen. During an observation of the kitchen on 4/17/2026 at 9:53 A.M., multiple dead bugs were noted in a light fixture above the 3-compartment sink used to wash food preparation utensils. During an interview on 4/17/2026 at 9:53 A.M. the DD indicated bugs were a problem and had been reported to the maintenance department but it had not yet been addressed. On 4/20/2026 at 10:25 A.M. a list of maintenance requests for the past 6 months was provided and the only issue listed was the peeling paint on kitchen ceiling tiles. On 4/22/2026 at 2:00 P.M. a policy regarding pest control was requested but one was not provided before survey exit. 410 IAC 16.2-3.1-19(f)(4)

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain informed consent for psychotropic medication administration for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 3)Findings include:The clinical record of Resident 3 was reviewed on 4/17/2026 at 8:45 A.M. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: gastrostomy status, difficulty in walking, dysphagia, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, personal history of malignant neoplasm of prostate, obstructive sleep apnea, irritable bowel syndrome, tremor, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and polyneuropathy.A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/24/2026, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and was taking an anticoagulant and an antidepressant.Physician Orders included, but were not limited to:Escitalopram Oxalate (antidepressant) Oral Tablet 10 mg (milligrams), give two tablets one time a day, 10/14initiated /2025 and Bupropion Hydrochloride (antidepressant) Oral Tablet 100 mg, give one tablet three times a day, initiated 10/22/2025.A Care Plan, initiated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to update a resident's care plan for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident 16) Finding includes: During an interview on 4/15/2026 at 10:42 A.M. Resident 16 indicated he had fallen several times. During an observation on 4/15/2026 at 10:42 A.M. a fall mat was noted on the floor next to Resident 16's bed. A record review was completed on 4/17/2026 at 1:24 P.M. for Resident 16. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's and dementia. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/6/2026, indicated Resident 16 was moderate.y cognitively impaired, required substantial assistance for toileting and bathing; and partial to moderate assistance for transfers. The assessment indicated the resident had had no falls since admission to the facility. In addition, the resident was receiving physical and occupational therapy during the time of the assessment. An admission Fall Risk Assessment, completed on 3/30/2026, indicated Resident 16 was a fall risk and had incurred a fall on 4/4/2026. The care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident after a fall for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident 16)1. During an interview on 4/15/2026 at 10:42 A.M. Resident 16 indicated he had fallen several times and had gone to the emergency room twice as a result of the falls.During an observation on 4/15/2026 at 10:42 A.M. a fall mat was noted on the floor next to Resident 16's bed.A record review was completed on 4/27/2026 at 1:54 P.M. for Resident 16. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and Parkinson's.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/6/2026, indicated Resident 16 had a moderate cognitive deficit; required maximum assist for bathing and toileting and required moderate assist for bed mobility and transfers. The assessment indicated the resident had had no falls since admission to the facility and received physical and occupational therapies.An admission Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident 16 was at risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure preventative measures were implemented for a resident with a pressure ulcer for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers.(Resident 10)Finding includes: A record review was completed on 4/17/2026 at 8:56 A.M. for Resident 10. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and a protein calorie deficit. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/19/2026, indicated Resident 10 had a moderate cognitive deficit, a range of motion deficit on both sides of their lower extremities; required maximal assistance with bed mobility and transfers; was frequently incontinent of bladder, and was always incontinent of bowels and had no pressure ulcers. A care plan regarding the resident's risk for pressure ulcer development was initiated on 9/4/2025 with interventions encourage adequate hydration and nutrition, keep skin clean and dry, pressure reducing mattress, skin assessments as indicated, assess per risk of skin breakdown. There were no specific preventative interventions for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide gastrostomy tube (G-tube) care as ordered by the Physician for 1 of 1 resident who was observed for G-tube care. (Resident 17)Finding includes: During an observation on 4/16/2026 at 10:12 A.M., LPN 5 removed Resident 17's dressing from around his G-tube and cleaned the skin with sterile water only and no soap. LPN 5 then applied a clean dressing around the G-tube insertion site. The skin around the G-tube insertion site was noted to be reddened. During an interview with LPN 5 on 4/16/2026 at 10:17 A.M., LPN 5 indicated she had not used soap and she was not sure if soap was supposed to be used during Resident 17's G-tube dressing change. Resident 17's record review was completed on 4/18/2026 at 11:00 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limit to: dysphagia, aphasia, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis of the left side. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated , 3/12/2026, indicated the resident was nonverbal, was rarely or never understood by others and rarely or never understood others, had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure laboratory services were obtained timely for 1 of 5 residents whose labs had been reviewed. (Resident 84)Findings include: The clinical record of Resident 84 was reviewed on 4/17/2026 at 11:35 A.M. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, acidosis, acquired absence of right leg below knee, acquired absence of left leg below knee, and immunodeficiency due to conditions classified elsewhere.A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/16/2026, indicated the resident was cognitively intact but did not indicate the resident had a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line (a thin, flexible tube inserted into an upper arm vein and threaded to a large vein near the heart for long-term intravenous access).During an interview, on 4/16/2026 at 10:45 A.M., Resident 84 indicated he has had a PICC line and had completed intravenous (IV) antibiotics for a previous urinary tract infection, weeks ago. The resident indicated a urine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed regarding emptying a urinal for 1 of 1 residents observed for urinal care. (Resident 40)Finding include:During an observation, on 4/21/2026 at 2:30 P.M., Certified Nurses Aid (CNA) 15 was exiting Resident 40's room carrying a half full urinal down the hallway. She continued down the hallway to the unit bathroom to empty the urinal. She had wet wipes in her hand grasping the urinal handle. She emptied the urinal but was not noted to wash her hands after emptying the urinal.During an interview with CNA 15, on 4/21/2026 at 2:32 pm, she indicated the way she carried the urinal was proper technique. She indicated that gloves were not to be worn in the hallway. CNA 15 indicated she had not washed her hands after emptying the urinal. She indicated she had had training on personal protective equipment but could not recall when that training had occurred.During an interview on 4/22/2026 at 12:11 PM with RN 14, she indicated staff were not supposed to go outside of resident rooms with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive plan of care including a plan for type 2 diabetes, wound care and colostomy care was created for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident B) Finding includes: On 3/27/25 at 11:30 A.M., a clinical record review was completed for Resident B's. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, paraplegea, type 2 diabetes, osteomylitis of the left femur that required surgical intervention and the application of wound vac placement, colostomy status, and pressure ulcers. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment,dated 2/21/25, indicated Resident B was fully cognitively intact, required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transferring, bathing, dressing, and personal hygiene. The resident was assessed to have had two stage 2 pressure ulcers, one unstageable pressure ulcer, and a surgical wound. In addition, Resident B was receiving insulin for diabetes and had received 5 injections in the previous 7 days. Physician's orders included the following: -Lantus Subcutaneous Solution to inject 10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure physician orders were in place for the treatment of low blood glucose, and failed to ensure the documentation was completed for wound care treatment according to physician orders, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for diabetic management and wound treatment, (Resident B). Finding includes: On 3/27/25 at 11:30 A.M., a clinical record review was completed for Resident B's. Diagnoses included paraplegia, type 2 diabetes, osteomylitis of the left femur, seizure disorder, history of stroke, colostomy status, neurogenic bladder requiring a catheter, resistance to multiple antibiotics, tachycardia, and pressure ulcers. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident B was fully cognitively intact, required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transferring, bathing, dressing, and personal hygiene. The resident was assessed to have had two stage 2 pressure ulcers, one unstageable pressure ulcer, and a surgical wound. In…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a sufficient number of nursing staff to provide care to residents on all nursing units. This deficient practice had the potential to affect of residents. See F677 for additional information regarding Residents B, M, D, E, and 55 Findings include: During a Resident/surveyor group meeting, conducted on 2/13/2025 at 1:41 P.M., 22 of 22 residents attending complained about untimely response to call lights, not receiving at least two showers a week and not receiving medications timely and/or not receiving all of their medications. During a Family meeting with the new corporate representatives and the Director of Nursing, conducted on 2/12/2024 at 2 PM, several resident representatives complained about the lack of staffing to provide care, especially at night and residents not receiving timely showers or medications. The family representatives queried the new corporate staff and DON about reducing the number of staff and firing the QMAs (Qualified Medication Aides) and shower aides. The Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. Resident M's record review was completed on 2/18/2025 at 11:13 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: paraplegia, sacral osteomyelitis, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder and epilepsy. A current Physician's order dated, 2/11/2025, indicated Resident M was to receive one gram ertapeneum (antibiotic) intravenously one time a day for sacral osteomyelitis from 2/11/2025 to 2/17/2025. A February 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated Resident M had not received her dose of ertapeneum on 2/13 and 2/16/2025. Resident M's record lacked the documentation she had refused her medication or a Physician had been notified that she had missed two doses of her medication. During an interview on 2/18/2025 at 2:15 P.M., the Director of Nursing indicated she was not sure why Resident M had missed two doses of ertapeneum, but Resident M should have received a dose of ertapeneum on 2/13 and 2/16/2025. 3. Resident L's record review was completed on 2/18/2025 at 1:05 P.M. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: spinal stenosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received showers or complete bed baths as scheduled for 5 of 8 residents who were reviewed for showers or complete bed baths. (Residents B, M, D, E, and 55) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 2/11/2025 at 9:48 A.M., Resident B indicated she was scheduled to receive three showers a week, but had not received a shower for over two weeks. She indicated there was not enough staff to give her a shower, but she had had a couple of bed baths over the last two weeks. During an interview on 2/12/2025 at 9:55 A.M., Resident B's family member indicated the resident had not had a shower in over two weeks and she had called and left multiple messages for the Administrator, but had not received a call back. During an interview on 2/12/2025 at 10:05 A.M., Resident B's family member indicated the resident was alert and oriented and the resident had been upset about not receiving any showers for over two weeks. Resident B's record review was completed on 2/12/2025 at 11:13 A.M. Diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow Physician orders related to tubi grips, and to failed to assess and treat an area of impaired skin for 2 of 12 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Residents J & 67) 1. During an interview on 2/11/2025 at 10:41 A.M., Resident J indicated she wore Tubi-grips to help with the swelling in her lower legs and feet. She indicated she could not put the Tubi-grips on by herself and staff had not regularly placed the Tubi-grips on her legs. During observations of Resident J, the resident was not wearing Tubi-grips (compression socks) on either leg and her right lower leg and foot were swollen: -2/11/2025 10:41 A.M. -2/12/2025 at 9:05 A.M. -2/13/2025 at 3:37 P.M. -2/14/2025 at 12:05 P.M. -2/17/2025 09:06 A.M. -2/17/25 2:01 P.M. Resident J's record review was completed on 2/17/2025 at 9:34 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: post polio syndrome, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, Parkinson's disease and anxiety. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/24/2025, indicated Resident J had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from verbal abuse for 1 of 1 residents reviewed. (Resident 51) Finding includes: During an observation and interview, on 2/12/2025 at 11:17 A.M., Resident 51 indicated there was an agency nurse on the evening shift that had yelled at her during her shifts at the facility. The resident was unable to recall the staff member's name. Resident 51 indicated the last incident where this staff yelled at her happened approximately two to three weeks ago. Resident 51 indicated the last incident had occurred when she was lying in bed, felt unwell and did not want to attend meal service in the dining room. The resident indicated the nurse raised her voice and demanded the resident get out of her bed and go to the dining room for her meal. Resident 51 was tearful during the re-telling of this occurrence. Resident 51 said, I feel like I'm going to die here. Resident 51 indicated she had reported the incident to the Director of Nursing (DON) the day after the incident had occurred. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident from free from a physical restraint for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for restraints. (Resident 67) Finding includes: During an observation on 2/11/2025 at 10:52 A.M., Resident 67 was seated in the dining room in a wheelchair being fed his breakfast by the CNA 11. There was a fastened seat belt noted to be across the resident's lap. During an observation and interview on 2/11/2025 at 11:00 A.M., Resident 67 was had finished his breakfast and w the resident was asked to release his button seat belt. Resident 67 was unable to release the button clasp. During an observation on 2/12/2025 at 11:29 A.M., Resident 67 was seated in his wheelchair in the hallway with the seat belt fastened. During an observation on 2/17/2025 at 3:12 P.M., Resident 67 was seated in his wheelchair with the seat belt fastened. A record review was completed on 2/11/2025 at 2:00 P.M. for Resident 67. Diagnoses included but not limited to: osteoarthritis of right hand, localized swelling, mass and lump right upper limb,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's allegation of verbal abuse was reported timely after an allegation was made to the Indiana Department of Health for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse. (Resident 51) Finding included: During an observation and interview, on 2/12/2025 at 11:17 A.M., Resident 51 indicated there was an agency nurse on the evening shift that had yelled at her during her shifts at the facility. The resident was unable to recall the staff member's name. Resident 51 indicated the last incident where this staff yelled at her had occurred approximately two to three weeks ago. Resident 51 indicated this last incident occurred when she was lying in bed, felt unwell and did not want to attend meal service in the dining room. The resident indicated the nurse raised her voice and demanded the resident get out of her bed and go to the dining room for her meal. Resident 51 was tearful during the re-telling of this occurrence. Resident 51 said, I feel like I'm going to die here. Resident 51 indicated she reported the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive plan of care included a plan to address an osteomyelitis diagnosis and the use of an indwelling catheter for 1 of 24 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. (Resident Q) Findings include: A record review for Resident Q was completed on 2/18/2025 at 9:00 A.M. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to osteomyelitis right foot/ankle, diabetes mellitus type 2, anxiety, depression, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease stage 3. A Physician's order dated 2/7/2025 indicated, an order for the medication, ceftazidime 1.25 grams (gm) intravenously (IV) for osteomyelitis, A History and Physical evaluation, dated 1/3/2025 by the attending Physician, indicated an X-ray of Resident Q's foot had shown chronic osteomyelitis and the resident was started on IV antibiotics. A Nursing Progress note, dated 2/7/2025, indicated Resident Q was admitted from the hospital due to a diagnosis of osteomyelitis. Resident Q's record did not include a plan of care for osteomyelitis. In addition, there was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with activities designed to meet their interest and their physical, mental, psychosocial well-being for 2 of 2 resident reviewed for activities. (Resident 55 and 83) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 2/12/2025 at 2:37 P.M., Resident 55 was observed seated in her room while reclined in a Broda chair with a television playing. During an observation, on 2/13/2025 at 11:03 A.M., Resident 55 was observed in a Broda chair in her room with her eyes open and looking at the floor. The television was tuned to a game show. During an observation, on 2/14/2025 at 2:04 P.M., Resident 55 was observed lying in her bed on her right side with her eyes closed. The February activity calendar indicated Valentine Bingo was scheduled at this time. The clinical record of Resident 55 was reviewed on 2/17/2025 at 8:46 A.M. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Alzheimer's disease, dementia, peripheral vascular disease, depression, anxiety, unspecified convulsions and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there were clinical indications to support the continued use of an indwelling catheter for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for catheters. (Resident Q) Findings include: A record review for Resident Q was completed on 2/18/2025 at 9:00 A.M. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to osteomyelitis right foot/ankle, diabetes mellitus type 2, anxiety, depression, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease stage 3. A Physician's order, dated 2/7/2025, included the following: Foley (urinary) catheter, size 18 french, 10 milliliter balloon. A Physician's progress note,dated 2/8/2025, indicated Resident Q had a Foley (urinary) catheter. There was no documentation of why the resident required the use of an indwelling urinary catheter. A Nurse Practitioner (NP) note, dated 2/20/2025, indicated Resident Q had redness to her buttocks and a Foley urinary catheter was in place for wound healing. However, there was no documentation of any current open wounds for Resident Q that could have been contaminated by urine. During an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow Physician's orders related to enteral feedings for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a gastronomy tube (G-tube) (Resident 46). Finding includes: During an observation on 2/11/2025 at 2:53 P.M., a bottle of Osmolite 1.5 (enteral tube feeding) was disconnected from Resident 46 and hanging on an intravenous line (IV) pole. The bottle of Osmolite was not dated and had approximately 200 milliliters (mLs) left in the bottle. During an observation on 2/12/2025 at 10:40 A.M., a bottle of Osmolite 1.5 was disconnected from Resident 46 and hanging on an IV pole. The bottle of Osmolite was dated 2/11/2024 and had approximately 300 mLs remaining in the bottle. During an observations on 2/13/2025 at 1:36 P.M., a bottle of Osmolite 1.5 was disconnected from Resident 46 and was hanging on an IV pole with approximately 200 mLs still remaining in the bottle. The date on the bottle was 2/12/2024. Resident 46's record review was completed on 2/13/2025 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist a resident with a fractured arm apply her continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and clean the equipment after use for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 23) Finding includes: During an observation and interview on 2/11/2025 at 10:49 A.M., Resident 23's CPAP mask and tubing were lying uncovered on an opened SoClean machine on the right side of the resident's bed. Resident 23 had a splinted right arm propped up on a pillow. During an observation and interview on 2/11/2025 at 2:40 P.M., Resident 23 indicated no one ever cleaned her CPAP, and she did not always wear her CPAP because it was too hard for her to put on by herself with a broken arm. Resident 23 indicated no one had helped her the previous night. During an observation on 2/12/2025 at 2:22 P.M., Resident 23's CPAP mask and tubing was still lying uncovered on an opened SoClean machine. During an observation and interview on 2/13/2025 at 11:15 A.M., Resident 23 indicated she did not wear her CPAP the previous night…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to follow standards of practice for infection control for 3 of 4 residents who received supplemental oxygen or wore a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) machine at night. (Residents 27, 95 and 11) Findings include: 1. During the following observations, Resident 27's CPAP mask was in a SoClean (automated CPAP equipment cleaner and sanitizer) machine. The SoClean machine was not on, did not have a lid and the inside of the machine contained dust. -2/11/2025 at 10:25 A.M. -2/12/2025 at 11:56 A.M. -2/14/2025 at 2:10 P.M. -2/18/2025 at 1:54 P.M. Resident 27's record review was completed on 2/17/2025 at 3:30 P.M. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: Parkinson's disease, sleep apnea, anxiety and dysphagia. A current Physician's order dated, 4/9/2024, indicated Resident 27's CPAP mask was to be placed in the SoClean machine with the tubing intact after it was removed from the resident. A current Care Plan dated, 3/17/2023, indicated Resident 27 had altered respiratory status related to sleep apnea. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Hoyer Lift (a mechanical lift device) was used safely, by staff, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident D) Finding includes: On 9/20/24 at 11:04 A.M., a review of the clinical record for Resident D was conducted. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: non-traumatic brain injury, insulin dependent diabetic, seizure disorder and aphasia. A Fall Risk assessment, dated 7/9/24, indicated the resident was a high risk for falls. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 7/11/24, indicated the resident was non-verbal, dependent (helper does all of effort) with all transfers, had no falls and weighed 155 pounds. A Fall Care Plan, initiated on 6/7/23 and revised on 2/2/24, indicated the resident was at risk for an injury related to seizure activity, immobility and increased tone due to a brain injury. The interventions included, but were not limited to: obtain labs as ordered, keep physician informed of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was handled appropriately, foods were sealed appropriately, and foods were dated when opened. This had the potential to affect the 120 residents who receive meals from the kitchen. Findings include: 1. During a meal observation , on 3/11/2024 at 12:18 P.M., CNA 8 approached a resident and picked up the residents roll with a bare hand and buttered the roll. The CNA then approached another resident, and with bare hands, picked up the resident's roll and buttered it. CNA 8 approached a third resident and asked about needing a roll buttered. The third resident replied yes, and the CNA picked up the roll with a bare hand and buttered the roll. During an interview, on 3/11/2024 at 12:24 P.M., CNA 8 indicated she should not have touched the food with her bare hands. 2. During a walk-through observation of the main kitchen, on 3/11/2024 at 9:40 A.M., with dietary staff 7, the following was observed in the walk-in freezer: an open, unsealed bag of chicken tenders without a label or date, an open and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for 1 of 26 residents whose care plans were reviewed. (Resident 45) Finding includes: During an observation, on 3/12/2024 at 10:17 A.M., a black, scabbed, lesion was noted to the right side of Resident 45's jaw. The resident indicated it kept bleeding and the doctor had not looked at it. A record review was conducted on 3/13/2024 at 1:23 P.M. Diagnoses for Resident 45 included, but were not limited to, metabolic encephalopathy, collapsed vertebrae in thoracic region, and pain in thoracic spine. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/15/2024, indicated Resident 45's cognition was intact. She was at risk for pressure ulcers, but none were noted. No other skin problems were noted. The record lacked any physician orders or a care plan related to the skin lesion on her jaw. During an interview, on 3/14/2024 at 10:31 A.M., LPN 5 indicated the Nurse Practitioner (NP) looked at it last year and thought a referral was made to a dermatologist, but couldn't be sure.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update a fall care plan with new interventions after a fall, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident 111) Finding includes: During an interview, on 3/11/2024 at 2:47 P.M., Resident 111 indicated he had a recent fall, but was unsure when. A record review was completed on 3/13/2024 at 1:22 P.M. The resident had intact cognition, with diagnoses including, but not limited to: type two diabetes, concussion without loss of consciousness, history of transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/6/2024, indicated the resident required extensive assistance with the assist of one person for bed mobility, transferring and toileting and supervision with the assist of setup help for eating. An Interdisciplinary Team Note, dated 2/20/2024, indicated the resident had slid out of his wheelchair and the intervention included therapy assessment of cushion with anti-slip device placement. An Interdisciplinary Team Note, dated 3/6/2024, indicated the resident had fallen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to administer a PRN (as needed) diuretic medication per Physician's Orders, for 1 of 5 residents whose medication orders were reviewed. (Resident 174) Finding includes: During an interview, on 3/11/2024 at 2:37 P.M., Resident 174 was observed to have edema (swelling) to bilateral (both) feet. A record review was completed on 3/14/2024 at 10:41 A.M. Resident 174's diagnoses included, but were not limited to chronic congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, pacemaker, and a cardiac defibrillator. Current Physician Orders included: Daily Weights: See PRN (as needed) medication order for weight gain of 2 lbs. (pounds) or greater in 24 hour in the morning. Lasix (diuretic) 20 mg (milligram) give 1 tablet by mouth every 24 hours as needed for CHF (Congestive Heart Failure) for weight gain of 2 lbs. or greater in 24 hours. Resident 174's current weights were as follows: 3/7/2024--245 lbs. 3/8/2024--245 3/10/2024--238 3/11/2024---247 (gain of 9 lbs.) 3/12/2024--248 3/13/2024--250 3/14/2024--251 The March 2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was stored appropriately and cleaned, for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen use. (Residents 8 & 83) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 3/11/2024 at 2:33 P.M., Resident 8's CPAP mask was lying on top of the bedside dresser, not placed in the SloClean machine and without a storage bag. During an observation, on 3/12/2024 at 8:57 A.M. the resident's CPAP mask was lying on top of the bedside dresser, not placed in the SloClean machine and without a storage bag. During an observation, on 3/13/2024 at 9:50 A.M., the resident's CPAP mask was lying on top of bedside dresser, not placed in the SloClean machine and without a storage bag. During an observation, on 3/14/2024 at 1:34 P.M., Resident 8's CPAP mask was not bagged and was lying on top of the dresser, not in the SloClean machine and without a storage bag. During an interview, on 3/14/2024 at 1:30 P.M., the Director of Nursing indicated CPAP masks should be kept in the SloClean Machine for cleaning purposes while not in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received person centered dementia care for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dementia care. (Resident 6) Finding includes: A random observation was completed on 3/13/2024 at 9:53 A.M. Resident 6 was in the restroom yelling out she was going to sue the facility because she did not want the help from the two CNAs trying to help her. CNA 8 was heard telling the resident she was going to get the paperwork and a pen so the resident could sue the facility. An interview with CNA 8 was completed on 3/13/2024 at 9:55 A.M. CNA 8 indicated there were no excuses for what she said to Resident 6, and she should not have told Resident 6 that she was going to get paperwork and a pen to sue the facility. A record review was completed on 3/13/2024 at 2:15 P.M. Resident 6's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: dementia, pseudobulbar affect, traumatic brain injury, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 2/7/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Bases on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label medications with the patient identification and date the medication was opened, for 3 medications found in 2 of 6 medication carts. (Northwest Cart 1 & East cart 1). The facility also failed to maintain a clean and sanitaty environment for medication storage to preserve medication integrity, for 1 of 6 medication carts observed. (Riverlane Cart) Findings include: 1. During an observation of the Northwest Cart 1 with RN 4, on 3/14/2024 at 9:15 A.M., a bottle of Flonase was found open, but no open date was noted. During an interview, on 3/14/2024 at 9:15 A.M., RN 4 indicated the Flonase should have had an open date on the box. 2. During an observation of the East Cart 1 medication cart with LPN 13, on 3/14/2024 at 2:54 P.M., 2 sealed bottles of nitroglycerin tablets were in the drawer, with no label or patient identifier information. During an interview, on 3/14/2024 at 2:54 P.M., LPN 13 indicated she did not know to whom the nitroglycerin belonged, and they should be labeled. A current policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
POPULAR BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 01/08/2025
DELILAH 2626 HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
HEALTHWIN SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
HEALTHWIN SNF OPERATIONS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
HVH HEALTHWIN SNF OPCO MANAGER LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
JML 1836 HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
JNL 2024 FAM TROrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
LANSILH IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
LION 26 HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
MJL 2024 FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
SABRINA 1818 HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
SAESSY IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
TATIRIQ IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
YMB HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
BENNET-IDELS, HEATHERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/08/2025
BOTWINICK, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
CARVER, DILLIONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/08/2025
DUHAIME, KELLEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
IDELS, SHIMONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/08/2025
LIEBERMAN, ROCHELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/08/2025
MALOTT, GREGGIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
PRAGER, ELISHEVAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/08/2025
QUINN, CHRISTOPHERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
SCHMIDT, SARAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
SCHWARTZ, STEVENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/08/2025
GOTTESMAN, DANIELIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/18/2025
LUSTBADER, ANDREWIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/18/2025
LUSTBADER, JONATHANIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/18/2025
BENNETT, ADAMIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
HUTTON, CHARLESIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
KAUFFMAN, CLINTONIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
LEMAN, VALERIEIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
MCKAY, MICHAELIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
SMITH, JENNIFERIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
WHITE, TAYLORIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
20531 SARDEN RD SNF REAL ESTATE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
HEALTHWIN REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 55 rows in the source record cover these 37 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

16 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-29.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 9%Other / private 20%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$505per resident / day
operating cost
$15,351per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$390per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155153. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next