No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Majestic Care Of South Bend

52654 N Ironwood Rd, South Bend, IN 46635 · For profit - Individual · 103 certified beds · (574) 277-8710 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2023Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0569)2 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$116,322 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0569)
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $116,322 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-15)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
6301 University Commons · (574) 273-2000 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2081 S Bend Ave · (574) 272-6922 · Call to confirm hours
Park
53105 Ironwood Rd · (206) 920-4893 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.9%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.2%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms16.0%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.6%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.4%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.6%23.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.9%95.4%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.1%3.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.0%23.3%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.8%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication9.8%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine12.5%79.0%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.831.611.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.751.441.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 7.0–17.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.161.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.62
RN hours/ resident / day
0.65
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.04
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.32
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.45
RN hoursweekends
68.4%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 103 beds and averages 68.4 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.32 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-19)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-04)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-08-23 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required dialysis services continued to receive those services in accordance with physician orders when the facility-based dialysis center closed on 8/12/2024 for 6 of 7 residents reviewed for dialysis services. (Resident D, E, F, R, S and V) This deficient practice resulted in Resident D and Resident E missing two dialysis treatments and required transfer to an acute care hospital for treatment of critical laboratory results and emergency dialysis treatments. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 8/12/24, when the facility failed to ensure the provision of dialysis services were continued for the residents who previously had an order for Dialysis on Monday-Friday until the facility-based dialysis unit closed on Friday, 8/10/24, without residents having arrangements in place for when their next dialysis treatment would occur, on Monday 8/12/2024. The Interim Administrator, Interim Director of Nursing and the Regional Nurse Consultant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-15 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to immediately initiate Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) in accordance with the resident's advanced directives for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for facility discharge. (Resident D) This deficient practice resulted in CPR not being provided immediately when staff found the unresponsive resident and the resident died. The Immediate Jeopardy began, on 6/22/24 at 5:25 P.M., when staff identified Resident D was unresponsive and failed to immediately initiate CPR. The Administrator and the Interim Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 7/12/24 at 12:46 P.M. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed, on 7/13/24, but noncompliance remained at the lower scope and severity level of isolated, no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not Immediate Jeopardy. Finding includes: On 7/11/24 at 11:13 A.M., a review of the clinical record for Resident D was conducted. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-10-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to supervise a resident, with severe cognitive deficits and wandering behaviors, from exiting the facility resulting in the elopement of Resident J. The immediate jeopardy began on 10/3/23 when the facility failed to ensure supervision was provided to Resident J, who was deemed high risk for an elopement, had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and displayed exit seeking behaviors. As a result, the resident was able to exit the facility unattended. The Interim Administrator, Director of Nursing Services, and Regional Nurses were notified of the immediate jeopardy, at 12:21 P.M. on 10/11/23. The immediate jeopardy was removed, and the deficient practice corrected, on 10/4/23, prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past Noncompliance Finding includes: On 10/10/23 at 11:21 A.M., a review of the clinical record for Resident J was conducted. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Alzheimer's Disease, schizoaffective disorder,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's representative of a medication change for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident E)Finding includes:Resident E's clinical record was reviewed on 6/25/26 at 3:50 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, restless leg syndrome, chronic pain, anxiety and hemiplegia following a stroke.A Minimum Data Set Quarterly Assessment, dated 6/9/26, indicated Resident E had moderate cognitive impairment.A review of the resident's POST (Indiana Physician Orders for Scope and Treatment) form, dated 10/10/25, indicated Resident E's legal representative was Family Member A.Resident E's Durable Power of Attorney form, dated 10/10/25, indicated the resident's Power of Attorney was Family Member A.The resident's physician orders included but were not limited to:Ropinirole Hydrochloride to give one -1 MG tablet by mouth one time a day related to restless legs syndrome, with a start date of 10/9/25 and an end date of 6/4/26.Ropinirole Hydrochloride to give 1 MG tablet, to give 1.5 tablet at bedtime…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were served under safe and sanitary conditions related to monitoring food temperatures before serving. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 69 of 70 residents who were served meals from the facility kitchen. Finding includes:On 1/7/25 at 10:45 A.M., facility Grievances from 10/1/25 to 1/7/25 were reviewed. On 12/16/25 the Resident Council had submitted a grievance that indicated Residents did not want their food served cold. A grievance, dated 12/20/25, indicated the food was served cold every day. A review of Resident Council Minutes, dated 11/18/25, indicated the residents had expressed concerns that breakfast was often cold when served to them and they wanted food to be served to them on time so that the food was hot when served. On 1/14/25, the Service Line Checklist logs from 12/1/25 to 1/14/26 were reviewed and indicated the following:12/1/25: Breakfast temp recorded without items named. Lunch had no beverage items listed with the temps. Dinner had no beverage temps.12/2/25: Breakfast…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's physician and responsible party were notified of the resident's refusal to be weighed and of the resident's significant weight loss, for 1 of 3 resident's reviewed for weight loss, (Resident E).Finding includes:Resident E's clinical record was reviewed on 1/12/26 at 11:38 A.M. Resident E was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease, neurocognitive disorder with behavioral disturbance, delusional disorder, insomnia, and muscle weakness.The most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed for a quarterly review, dated 10/22/25, indicated Resident B had severe cognitive impairment, had demonstrated negative behaviors not directed toward others, wandered daily, and utilized antipsychotic and antianxiety medications. The resident's weight was 170 pounds at the time of the assessment.An MDS assessment, dated 11/26/25 for a Discharge Assessment, indicated the resident had inattention and disorganized thinking that was continuously…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the Physician for 9 of 9 residents reviewed for medications. (Residents 3, 8, 29, 51, 67, 69, 14, 1 and 4)Findings include:1. During an interview on 8/13/2025 at 10:00 A.M., Resident 3 indicated his medications were given late a lot and he was not receiving his insulin with his meals. Resident 3's record review was completed on 8/15/2025 at 12:00 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Resident 3's current Physicians' orders included, but were not limited to: -5 milligram (mg) tablet of amlodipine (treats hypertension) once daily -insulin Lispro - 12 units subcutaneously with meals, -insulin lispro - sliding scale based on blood glucose four times daily -insulin glargine - 45 units subcutaneously twice daily -multivitamin- 1 tablet daily -5 mg Eliquis (anticoagulant)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had the competencies to administer medications timely and/or administer medications as ordered by the Physician for 8 of 8 residents (Resident's 1, 3, 4, 8, 29, 51, 67 and 69.) See F684 for additional information regarding Resident's 1, 3, 4, 8, 29, 51, 67 and 69. Findings include: 1. A record review of Resident 1 was completed on 8/15/2025 at 11:00 A.M. Resident 1's record indicated Physician orders for administering insulin before meals. RN 3 administered the breakfast time insulin on 7/17/2025 at 1:30 P.M. and administered the lunch time insulin on 7/17/2025 at 1:30 P.M. On 7/19/2025, RN 3 administered the breakfast insulin at 11:30 A.M. On 7/23/2025, the breakfast insulin was administered at 11:38 A.M by QMA 22. On 7/29/2025 the lunch (12:00 P.M) insulin was administered by RN 3 at 3:05 P.M. On 8/14/2025 RN 3 administered the lunch meal insulin at 2:24 P.M. Between 7/15/2025 and 8/15/2025, Resident 1 received medications at least an hour and a half (90 minutes) late 24 out of the last 60 shifts. (2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise care plans to reflect the current status for 1 of 22 residents whose care plans were reviewed. (Residents 29)Findings include: During a record review on 8/14/20205 at 11:39 A.M., an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident 29's cognition was severely impaired, his mobility and locomotion required the use of a manual wheelchair and his activity preferences that were very important to him included listening to music and being around animals and pets. An Activity Care Plan problem, initiated on 7/27/2025, indicated Resident 29 preferred playing cards, watching reality shows, and enjoyed rock and roll music. An intervention indicated that the resident would be verbally reminded of the time and place of the activity. There was no intervention to ensure the resident was physically assisted and taken to the desired activities and there was no intervention to ensure the resident was invited to activities including any animals or pet visits. During an interview on 8/18/2025 at 12:10 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide personalized activity programs for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for activities. (Resident 29 and 10)Findings included: 1. On 8/13/2025 at 12:36 P.M., Resident 10 was observed seated in her room, watching television. During a continuous observation, on 8/15/2025 from 1:54 P.M. through 2:12 P.M., Resident 10 was observed seated in her room by herself, while bingo was being held by Activities staff in the dining hall. During an interview, on 8/15/2025 at 10:33 A.M., the Activities Director (AD) indicated the activity interventions for a resident depended on their likes and abilities. The AD indicated Resident 10 liked to be around people, listen to music and play bingo. During an interview, on 8/15/2025 at 2:19 P.M., Resident 10 indicated she liked to drink and go outside. During an interview, on 8/18/2025 at 10:23 A.M., the AD indicated outdoor time means the resident was taken outside by facility staff. The AD indicated the resident was recently taken outside by her sister. The Activity Director indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to serve food in a sanitary manner for 1 of 1 dining rooms observed during the lunch meal service. This had the potential to affect 70 of 70 residents in the facility.Finding includes: During a continuous observation on 8/12/2025, from 12:16 P.M. through 12:28 P.M., CNA 11 was observed to serve food with her thumb over the rim of the plate for 2 of 2 residents in the dining hall. During an interview, on 8/12/2025 at 12:29 P.M., CNA 11 indicated she always held plates from the bottom. On 8/13/2025 at 11:30 A.M., the Regional [NAME] President of Operations provided a policy titled, Meal Supervision, dated 12/12/2023 and indicated the policy was the one currently used by the facility. The policy indicated .The facility will utilize a systemic approach to ensure safety throughout the resident's environment .3.1-21(i)(3)

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Number of residents sampled:Number of residents cited:Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure aseptic technique and enhanced barrier precautions were maintained during PICC (peripherally-inserted central catheter) care for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for PICC line care. (Resident 7). In addition, the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was cleaned for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 4) Findings included:1.During an observation, on 8/12/2025 at 2:33 P.M., Resident 4's had a PICC (a peripherally inserted central catheter, or a long, thin, flexible tube inserted into a vein into the arm and threaded into a larger vein near the heart) line dressing on her right upper arm but the date on the dressing not legible because the ink was smudged. The clinical record of Resident 4 was reviewed on 8/14/2025 at 2:05 P.M. The residents' diagnoses included, but were not limited to: urinary tract infection, diabetes mellitus with neuropathy, giant cell arteritis, prosthetic heart valve, dissection of aorta, vascular dementia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plan conferences were completed every quarter for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for care plans. (Residents 13, 8, 59 & 26) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 9/30/2024 at 2:21 P.M., the family of Resident 13 indicated the resident had not had a care plan conference for the 2024 year. On 10/3/2024 at 9:05 A.M., a record review was completed for Resident 13. The record indicated the resident had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] and a care conference was completed on 4/14/2023. The record lacked documentation a care plan conference had been completed for the 2024 year. 2. During an interview on 10/1/2024 at 11:04 A.M., Resident 26 indicated she had not had a care plan meeting. A record review was completed on 10/1/2024 at 11:40 P.M., for Resident 26. Diagnoses included, but not limited to: end stage renal disease and peripheral vascular disease. During an interview on 10/3/2024 at 1:59 P.M., the Social Service Director indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed store and prepare food in a sanitary manner related to labeling and dating of opened food in the walk-in cooler and disposing of expired spices in 1 of 1 kitchens observed. This had the potential to effect 72 of 74 residents who received their meals from the kitchen. Finding includes: 1. During the initial kitchen tour with the DM (Dietary Manager) on 9/30/2024 at 9:44 A.M., the following food items were observed in the walk-in cooler: -Eight single serve cheese cups did not have a made on or use by date. -Half a bag of salad mix was open but did not have an opened on or use by date. -A bag of celery was open and did not have an opened on or use by date. -7 bowls of salad with clear cellophane wrap did not have a made on or use by date. 2. During the initial kitchen tour with the DM on 9/30/2024 at 9:52 A.M., the following food items were observed in the dry storage areas: - Whole celery seed was opened 7/7/23 and had an expiration date of 1/30/24. - Poultry seasoning was opened but had no opened on date and had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to provide a dependent resident an assistive device for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. (Resident 3) Finding includes: During a family interview on 9/30/2024 at 2:25 P.M., the responsible party for Resident 3 indicated he was concerned Resident 3 did not have a wheelchair to get out of bed. The family member indicated Resident 3 was always in bed when he visited and did not see a wheelchair in his room. Resident 3's family member indicated he would like him to get out of the bed. During an observation on 10/1/2024 at 9:53 A.M., 10/2/2024 at 9:45 A.M., 10/2/2024 at 2:24 P.M., 10/3/2024 at 9:09 A.M., 10/3/2024 at 11:57 A.M., and 10/4/2024 at 1:29 P.M. Resident 7 was in bed and no wheelchair was in the room. A record review was completed on 10/2/2024 at 1:37 P.M., for Resident 3. Diagnoses included, but not limited to: hemiplegia, unspecified affecting left dominant side, vascular dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a SNF-ABN (Skilled Nursing Facility-Advanced Beneficiary Notice) Form was provided following the end of Medicare skilled services for 1 of 1 resident who discharged from Medicare services and remained in the facility. (Resident 45) Finding includes: During a review of Beneficiary Notification forms, conducted on 10/4/2024 at 8:45 A.M., a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form had been provided to Resident 45 on 6/26/2024 and indicated the resident's Medicare coverage was ending on 6/28/2024. There was no SNF-ABN (a form that informs a beneficiary that medicare may not pay for a service or item they intend to receive) provided to Resident 45. During an interview on 1/4/2024 at 8:54 A.M., the SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review Forms were reviewed. The form was blank in response to whether Resident 45 received the SNF-ABN form. Resident 45 was provided a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) Form which indicated Resident 45's Medicare coverage would end on 6/28/2024. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident, or the resident's representative, with a notice of transfer form for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Residents 8 and 59) Findings include: 1. A record review was completed on 10/3/2024 at 2:47 A.M. for Resident 8. Diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus with neuropathy, bladder cancer, anxiety and depression. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/10/2024, indicated Resident 8's cognition was intact. During an interview on 9/30/2024 at 2:30 P.M., Resident 8 indicated he had been hospitalized a few months ago but did not remember the specific date. Resident 8 had been sent to the emergency room and was admitted to the hospital on the following dates: -2/21/2024. -3/11/2024. -8/12/2024. The record lacked documentation the facility had provided Resident 8 a Notice of Transfer/Discharge for any of the hospitalizations. During an interview on 10/3/2024 at 2:35 P.M., the Executive Director (ED) indicated there was no documentation the Notice of Transfer/Discharge form was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident, or the resident's representative, with a copy of the Bed Hold Policy when sent to the hospital for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Residents 8 and 59) Findings include: 1. A record review was completed on 10/3/2024 at 2:47 A.M. for Resident 8. Diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus with neuropathy, bladder cancer, anxiety and depression. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/10/2024, indicated Resident 8's cognition was intact. During an interview on 9/30/2024 at 2:30 P.M., Resident 8 indicated he had been hospitalized a few months ago but did not remember the specific date. Resident 8 was sent to the emergency room and admitted to the hospital on the following dates: -2/21/2024. -3/11/2024. -8/12/2024. The record lacked documentation the facility provided Resident 8 a copy of the Bed Hold Policy for any of the hospitalizations. During an interview on 10/3/2024 at 2:35 P.M., the Executive Director (ED) indicated there was no documentation a copy of the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan regarding fluid needs for 1 of 18 residents whose care plans were reviewed. (Resident 8) Finding includes: A record review was completed on 10/01/2024 at 2:25 P.M. for Resident 8. Diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus with neuropathy and congestive heart failure. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/10/2024, indicated Resident 8's cognition was intact. Physician's Orders for Resident 8 included, but were not limited to: -6/28/2024 2000 milliliter (ml) daily fluid restriction for edema and congestive heart failure. -4/3/2024 Furosemide 40 milligrams (mg) by mouth two times a day related to hypertensive heart disease and congestive heart failure. A current Care Plan, initiated on 9/12/2022, indicated Resident 8 was at risk for a fluid imbalance related to acute kidney failure and diuretic use. Interventions included, but were not limited to: staff was to educate the resident and family on the importance of the fluid restriction, as well as the risks and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident were assisted with personal hygiene and showers for 3 of 4 records reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). (Resident 3 & 24) Findings include: 1. During a family interview on 9/30/2024 at 3:08 P.M., the responsible party indicated he did not think Resident 3 had been getting up out of bed to be given a shower. During an observation on 10/1/2024 at 9:53 A.M., 10/3/2024 at 9:09 A.M. and on 10/4/2024 at 9:03 A.M., Resident 3 had long finger nails with a brown substance under them. A record review was completed on 10/2/2024 at 1:37 P.M., for Resident 3. Diagnoses were included, but not limited to: hemiplegia, unspecified affecting left dominant side, vascular dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance and acquired absence of right leg below knee. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/25/2024, indicated Resident 3 had severe cognitive impairment, had limited range of motion to one side of his body and bathing and personal hygiene needs were not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to follow the Physician's orders related to flushing a G-tube (gastrointestinal tube) and changing the tubing for 2 of 2 residents who were reviewed for a G-tube. (Resident 222 & 7) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 10/1/2024 at 9:57 A.M., Resident 222 indicated his G-tube was not being used for nutrition or medications but it was supposed to be flushed twice a day. He indicated his G-tube had only been flushed once since his admission on [DATE]. During an interview on 10/2/2024 at 10:40 A.M., Resident 222 indicated his G-tube had not been flushed the last two days. During an observation on 10/2/2024 at 10:41 A.M., no medical equipment for flushing a G-tube was located in the residents room, bathroom or trash can. Resident 222's record review was completed on 10/2/2024 at 11:45 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: paraplegia, fusion of lumbar spine, neurogenic bowel and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. A current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of greater than 5 percent for 2 of 4 residents (Resident 28 & 35) observed during medication pass. There were 25 opportunities observed with 2 medication errors, resulting in a medication error rate of 8 percent. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on 10/2/2024 at 9:15 A.M., RN 11 did not have Resident 28's fluticasone propionate available to administer and indicated she would call the pharmacy. A record review was completed on 10/2/2024 at 10:00 A.M., for Resident 28. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: chronic pain syndrome and allergies. A Physician's Order, dated 3/28/2024, indicated Fluticasone Propionate suspension 50 micrograms (MCG) one spray in each nostril one time a day for allergies. 2. During an observation and interview on 10/2/2024 at 10:11 A.M., for Resident 35, RN 11 indicated she did not know why there were two inhalers in the opened bag in the medication drawer. She indicated neither inhaler had an opened date on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were carried out appropriately for the storage of respiratory equipment, catheter care, blood sugar monitoring and cleaning of a glucometer for 3 of 3 residents observed for infection control. (Resident 13, 21 & 26) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 10/1/2024 at 11:14 A.M., QMA 14 cleaned Resident 26's finger with an alcohol wipe then fanned the area with her hand. When she returned to the medication cart, she placed the unsanitized glucometer in a basket on top of supplies used for blood sugar monitoring and walked away. During an interview on 10/1/2024 at 11:18 A.M., QMA 14 indicated she was not sure if she could wave her hand over the finger and cleaning of the glucometer with a bleach wipe should have occurred after returning to the cart. 2. On 10/3/2024 at 9:05 A.M., a record review was completed for Resident 13. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: urinary tract infection, human immunodeficiency virus, and obstructive reflux uropathy. A review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment related to monitoring personal refrigerator temperatures and disposing of expired food in personal refrigerators for 3 of 3 residents who used personal refrigerators. (Residents 21, 44 & 45) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 9/30/2024 at 10:13 A.M., Resident 21's personal refrigerator had a temperature log form with the month labeled as August and no temperatures were recorded for any of the dates. During an observation on 9/30/2024 at 2:00 P.M., Resident 44's personal refrigerator had a temperature log form with the month labeled as August and no temperatures were recorded for any of the dates. During an observation on 9/30/2024 at 2:19 P.M., Resident 45's personal refrigerator had a temperature log form with the month labeled as July and had temperatures recorded only on 7/5/2024, 7/6/2024, 7/8/2024, 7/9/2024 and 7/10/2024. 2. During an observation on 9/30/2024 at 2:19 P.M., Resident 45's personal refrigerator contained the following expired food: - A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Licensed Nurse followed standards of practice, during a medication administration, related to observation of mediation consumption for 1 of 1 residents observed during a random observation. (Resident Q) Finding includes: During a random observation and interview, on 8/20/2024 at 11:25 A.M., Resident Q had a breakfast tray and a small clear cup of containing multiple medications on his bedside table, approximately five feet from his bed. He indicated he did not know the medications were on the table and stated it was not unusual for them to be left in the room. Resident Q indicated his medications often ended up on the floor because it was not communicated to him that his medications had been left on the bedside table. On 8/20/24 at 11:39 A.M., LPN 11, an agency staffing nurse, summoned to Resident Q's room to verify the cup of medications observed were Resident Q's medications. LPN 11 indicated the medications were Resident Q's medications and asked had asked the resident if he was ready to take them,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 residents reviewed for facility initiated transfers to a local hospital for dialysis treatments, received documentation including a statement of notification of the transfer, appeal rights, a copy of the bed hold policy and the Ombudsman's information. (Resident E, D and F) Findings include: 1. During an interview, on 8/19/24 at 1:05 P.M., Resident E's sister indicated Resident E was unable to breath, on 8/14/24, and had been transferred to a local emergency room (ER) where she required an immediate dialysis treatment. On 8/20/24 at 2:50 P.M., a review of the clinical record for Resident E was conducted. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), dependence on renal dialysis, congestive heart failure and respiratory failure. Nursing Progress Notes were reviewed from 8/12/24 through 8/14/24 and there were no nursing assessments documented for Resident E, who had not received her regularly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there were a sufficient number of licensed nurses (RN/LPN) to provide care and services to 1 of 2 nursing units (Skilled/Rehabilitation Unit.) This directly affected 5 of 10 residents reviewed for care needs. (Resident D, B, H, L, and K) See F678 for additional information regarding Resident D. See F755 for additional information regarding Residents B, L, K and D Finding includes: On [DATE] at 11:13 A.M., a review of the clinical record for Resident D was conducted. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: necrotizing fasciitis (flesh eating disease) to a sacral wound, insulin dependent diabetic, End Stage Renal Disease with hemodialysis and history of a cardiac arrest. A Care Plan, dated [DATE], indicated the resident was at risk for complications, related to medical conditions, medications and treatments. The interventions included, but were not limited to, observe for signs/symptoms of complications and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 shower rooms were cleansed after use. This had the potential to affect all 55 residents residing on the South unit, Finding includes: On 7/9/24 at 10:52 A.M., the following was observed in shower room A, on the South Unit: -An opened package of wipes on the sink. -Brief packages lying on top of a dresser/drawer. -A moderate size smear of a brown substance in front of toilet. -A smear of white substance on left assist bar, for the toilet. -Used towels on a cart. -A large chair with a wet sheet on it. -Trash in bags on floor near the door. During an observation of the South shower room A on 7/9/24 at 2:21 P.M., with Unit Manger the following was observed: -An opened package of wipes on the sink. -Brief packages lying on top of a dresser/drawer. - A moderate size smear of a brown substance in front of toilet. -A smear of white substance on left assist bar, for the toilet. -Used towels on a cart. -A large chair with a wet sheet on it. -Trash in bags on floor near the door. During an interview on 7/9/24 at 2:26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received medications and treatments in accordance with physician orders and per facility policy for 4 of 6 residents reviewed for nursing services, (Residents B, L, K & D). Findings Include: 1. A record review was completed for Resident B on 7/11/24 at 12:28 P.M. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cellulitis of right lower limb, type 2 diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, stage 2 pressure ulcer. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/22/24, indicated Resident B was cognitively intact, was admitted with one stage 2 pressure area and one stage 4 pressure area.and received 7 days of insulin injections in the previous 7 days of the assessment period. The current Physician's Orders included: -Accu Check 3 times daily before meals and at bedtime related to diabetes, ordered 5/17/24 with no end date. -Insulin Aspart Injection solution 100 unit/ml per sliding scale 3 times daily, ordered 5/16/24 with no end date.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident to resident abuse to local law enforcement within 24 hours as directed by the facility's policy, when 2 residents were allegedly involved in a physical altercation, resulting in forehead bruising to both residents, (Resident B and Resident C). Findings include: On 2/19/24 at 11:35 A.M., Indiana State Department of Heath Survey Report System, Incident Number 346, indicated, on 1/27/24 at 10:40 A.M., it was reported that Resident B made contact with Resident C and hit him in the face in the hallway while waiting to smoke. The residents were immediately separated, head to toe assessments were completed to note reddened areas to the foreheads of both residents. The report indicated the physician, administrator, and family were notified, Resident B was placed on 15 minute safety checks, and the residents would be separated during activities. On 2/19/24 at 1:35 P.M., during an interview with the Administrator, she indicated the incident was not reported to local law enforcement because neither…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed thoroughly investigate an allegation of resident to resident abuse when 2 residents were allegedly involved in a physical altercation resulting in forehead bruising to both residents, (Resident B and Resident C). Findings include: On 2/19/24 at 11:35 A.M., Indiana State Department of Heath Survey Report System, Incident Number 346, indicated on 1/27/24 at 10:40 A.M., it was reported that Resident B made contact with Resident C and hit him in the face in the hallway while waiting to smoke. The residents were immediately separated, head to toe assessments were completed to note reddened areas to the foreheads of both residents. The report indicated the physician, administrator, and family were notified, Resident B was placed on 15 minute safety checks, and the residents would be separated during activities. 2/19/24 at 1:35 P.M., during an interview with the Administrator, she indicated she felt the facility's investigation was thorough. She indicated there were no staff statements taken because Registered Nurse (RN) 9…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's representative was notified timely, when there was an acute change in the resident's condition. (Resident F) Finding includes: On 1/8/24 at 11:10 A.M., a review of the clinical record for Resident F was conducted. The resident's diagnoses were dementia and non-traumatic brain dysfunction. A Care Plan, dated 9/15/23, indicated the resident had advance directives and wished to be a full code. The interventions included but were not limited to: support resident/family with ongoing decisions, notify physician and representative of changes in the resident's condition. A Change of Condition Assessment form, dated 1/3/24 at 7:30 A.M., indicated at the time of the evaluation the resident's vital signs were: blood pressure 72/51, pulse 90, respirations 24 and temperature was 98.0. The resident's pulse oximetry was 98% on room air. The resident was a full code, however the resident had not been able to swallow, had labored/rapid breathing, had abnormal vital signs and had been lethargic. The recommendations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents reviewed received appropriate interventions when there had been an acute change of condition. (Resident F) Finding includes: On 1/8/24 at 11:10 A.M., a review of the clinical record for Resident F was conducted. The resident's diagnoses were dementia and non-traumatic brain dysfunction. A Care Plan, dated 9/15/23, indicated the resident had advance directives and wished to be a full code. The interventions included but were not limited to: support resident/family with ongoing decisions, notify physician and representative of changes in the resident's condition. A Progress Note, dated 1/3/24 at 6:30 A.M., indicated .Resident calmly resting in bed, R 24; T 98.0; P 90; B/P 72/51; O2 Sat 98% on room air. Resident is responsive to touch, only moans when being turned and repositioned. House NP (Nurse Practitioner) and DON (Director of Nursing) updated on resident's current condition. Will continue to monitor This Progress Note had been documented by LPN 2 A Change of Condition Assessment form, completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and dated in 1 of 2 medication storage rooms and 1 of 2 medications carts. Findings include: 1. During an observation of the South Medication Room, on 8/23/2023 at 3:08 P.M., with the North Unit Manager, an opened bottle of Konvomep insulin for Resident 137 was located in the refrigerator. The North Unit Manager confirmed there was no open date and indicated there should have been. 2. During an observation of the North Medication Cart, on 8/24/2023 at 2:30 P.M., with QMA 11, the following medications were noted to be labeled and opened but had no date to indicate when they had been opened: A bottle of Lispro insulin for Resident 138. A tube of Mupiricon ointment for Resident 46. A Trilegy inhaler for Resident 46. A Flutiicasaline aerosol vial for Resident 46. An albuterol inhaler for Resident 41. A large container of Peg 3350 powder for Resident 12. A large container of Peg 3350 powder for Resident 34. A large bottle of Milk of Magnesia for Resident 12. A large bottle of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items and drinks were covered when transporting 15 trays to residents who resided on the North hallway who received a meal tray on 8/21/23. Finding includes: During an interview, on 8/21/23 at 11:59 A.M., Resident C indicated he eats in his room, receives a tray of food and the only thing covered is the main dish. The rest of the meal had no lids, to cover the food. Resident indicated this morning his oatmeal had no cover on it and he won't eat anything that doesn't have a lid on it. He indicated he doesn't know if someone coughed over it or what. On 8/21/23 at 12:14 P.M., the Resident C's meal tray arrived to the room and was observed to have no lid or covering over his coffee, water, fruit or vegetable. On 8/21/23 at 12:18 P.M., Resident 140's meal tray was observed being transported down the hallway to his room. The tray was observed to have coffee, fruit and water, uncovered, on the tray. The staff member carrying the tray down the hallway indicated she transports the meal trays from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the north shower room had shower drains without debris covering them, this had the potential to effect 20 of 20 residents who used the shower room. Finding includes: On 8/20/23 at 5:58 P.M., the north shower room was observed to have 3 shower heads and drains. The drain the farthest from the entry door had half the drain covered over with hair. The middle drain had a wet empty sugar packet covering 1/4 of the drain. On 8/25/23 at 2:22 P.M., the north shower room was observed and the drain furthest from the entry door had half the drain covered with hair. The middle drain had a piece of the sugar packet lying inside the drain. During a tour of the north shower room, on 8/25/23 at 3:05 P.M., with the Housekeeping Director and the Corporate Administrator from a sister facility, the entry door was observed to have a notice on the door indicating Floor Wet. The Housekeeping Director indicated the shower room had just been cleaned. The drain furthest from the door was observed with hair covering half the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-28 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 28 residents with resident trust accounts had access to more than $50.00 of their funds on a daily basis and had reasonable access after hours and on weekends. Finding includes: During an interview with alert and oriented, Resident 15, on 8/22/2023 at 11:34 A.M., she indicated she could not access her resident fund money after 5:00 P.M.on Fridays. During an interview with alert and oriented, Resident 41, on 8/21/2023 at 2:09 P.M., he indicated resident fund money was only available if the Business Office Manager was in the building. During a review of the resident trust accounts and interview with the Business Office Manager, on 8/25/2023 at 9:30 A.M., she indicated residents only had access to $50.00 of their resident funds per day during the front receptionist hours. The Business Office Manager indicated $50.00 was the daily limit per the company policy. She indicated there was no system to allow residents to access more than $50.00 per day. On the weekend, the facility had recently started…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-28 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was documentation 1 of 28 residents with a resident trust account exceeding the Medicaid allowable limit was notified of the regulation. (Resident 71) Finding includes: During a review of the facility Resident Trust Accounts, on 8/25/2023 at 9:30 A.M., with the Business Office Manager, she disclosed Resident 71, a Medicaid funded resident's Resident Trust Account exceeded the allowable Medicaid limit. Review of the account ledger for Resident 71's Resident Trust Account, the resident had $4, 614.73 on 5/30/2023. The resident's current account balance, on 8/16/2023, was $3, 404.95. During an interview with the Business Office Manager, on 8/25/2023 at 9:30 A.M., she indicated she had verbally spoken with Resident 71 regarding her account balance. There was no documentation regarding the conversation, the Business Office Manager was unable to give a date she had spoken with the resident and although the resident's trust fund account balance was lower, it still exceeded the Medicaid limitation. 3.1-6(h)

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 residents interviewed were free of verbal abuse. (Resident E) Finding includes: On 8/23/23 at 10:22 A.M., a review of the clinical record for Resident E was conducted. The resident's diagnoses included, but was not limited to: End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), heart failure, diabetic, dependent on dialysis, respiratory failure-dependent on supplemental oxygen and morbid obesity. A Progress Note, dated 8/5/23 at 2:46 P.M., written by RN 5 indicated the resident had a behavior that morning. The Note indicated the resident had waited awhile for CNA 6 and when she arrived, to the room, the resident had taken her own brief off and had thrown it on the floor. RN 5 talked to the resident concerning her behavior with CNA 6. A Progress Note, dated 8/9/2023 at 2:08 P.M., indicated the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) met with Resident E's sister regarding the incident on 8/5/23. The sister was informed the incident was reported to the Indiana Department of Health and CNA 6 was suspended pending an investigation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that notification of the Ombudsman was made in a timely manner of resident's discharge from the facility for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for notification of discharge. (Resident 86) Finding includes: A clinical record review was completed on, 8/23/2023 3:17 P.M., diagnoses for Resident 86 included, but were not limited to: systemic lupus erythematosus, Human Immunodeficiency Virus, bipolar disorder manic with psychotic features, anxiety disorder, schizoaffective disorder. An MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment was initiated on 6/16/2023 and not completed. Resident 86 was admitted [DATE] and sent to the hospital on 6/17/2023. Resident 86 returned to facility 6/20/2023 and sent to the hospital on 6/21/2023 with discharge not anticipated. A Progress Note, dated 6/17/2023 at 9:21 P.M., indicated .stated that she is hearing voices in her mind and was put on fifteen minutes checks A Progress Note, dated 6/17/2023 at 9:30 P.M., indicated .trying to put a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were developed for 1 of 28 residents reviewed. (Resident 11) Finding includes: A record review for Resident 11 was completed on 8/22/2023 at 3:22 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: type 2 diabetes, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, acquired total absence of pancreas, and chronic pain syndrome. During an interview, on 8/20/2023 at 4:37 P.M., Resident 11 was concerned with going blind in his left eye. He was seen by the facility eye doctor and he was told of a cataract in his left eye that needed to be removed. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/3/2022, indicated he had impaired vision. A Progress Note, dated 10/31/2022, from the (name of provider)indicated that the patient wants to proceed with surgery. Cataract surgery recommended, ophthalmology consult with follow up in 4-5 months. A Progress Note, dated 4/19/2023, from the (name of provider) indicated patient wanted to proceed with surgery, cataract surgery recommended and ophthalmology consult for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised and residents were invited to care plan meetings for 1 of 29 residents whose care plans were reviewed. (Resident 26 ). Finding includes: During an interview, on 8/21/23 9:59 A.M., Resident 26 indicated that he had not been invited routinely or included in care plan meetings. He indicated he was his own representative. During an interview, on 8/25/2023 at 10:01 A.M., with the MDS (Minimum Data Set) nurse, she indicated the Care Plan review pops up every quarter with the MDS assessment reminder and both the assessment and care plan were revised at the same time. She indicated the care plan invitations came from the social services department and the new social worker had just started that week. During an interview, on 8/25/2023 at 2:38 P.M., the Regional Nurse indicated there was no documentation the resident had been invited, notified or included in the care plan meetings. 3.1-35(c)(2)

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide shaving for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents 7 and 41) and nail care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident 41) who were unable to perform these tasks. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview, on 8/21/2023 at 2:21 P.M., Resident 41 had not been shaved and his fingernails were long with dark brown matter under them. The resident indicated that he would like to be shaved but it is not done, even when he asks. The same problem occurred with his fingernails. A record review, conducted on 8/23/2023 at 11:31 A.M., indicated Resident 41's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Parkinson's disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 7/28/2023, indicated Resident 41 had no cognitive deficits. He required extensive assist of 1 staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. He needed limited assist of 1 for dressing and eating. A Care Plan dated 11/21/2022, reviewed/revised 11/22/2022, included, but was not limited to:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-28 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to arrange an ophthalmology follow up appointment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for vision and hearing. (Resident 11) Finding includes: A record review for Resident 11 was completed on 8/22/2023 at 3:22 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: type 2 diabetes, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, acquired total absence of pancreas, and chronic pain syndrome. During an interview on 8/20/2023 at 4:37 P.M., Resident 11 was concerned with going blind in his left eye. He was seen by the facility eye doctor and he was told of a cataract in his left eye that needed to be removed. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/3/2022, indicated he had impaired vision. A Progress Note, dated 10/31/2022, from the [name of provider] indicated that the patient wanted to proceed with surgery. Cataract surgery was recommended, ophthalmology consult with follow up in 4-5 months. A Progress Note, dated 4/19/2023, from the [name of provider] indicated the patient wanted to proceed with surgery. Cataract surgery…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with significant weight loss received fortified pudding as ordered for 1 out of 4 reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 13) Finding includes: The record review for Resident 13 was completed on 8/23/2023 at 10:00 A.M. Diagnoses included, but not limited to: anorexia, dementia without behavioral disturbances and chronic kidney disease stage 2. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/27/2023, indicated a weight loss. A Nutrition/Dietary Note, dated 7/13/2023, indicated Resident 13 triggered at 180 days significant weight loss of 11 pounds which is 9.8 % on 7/3/2023. Weight taken on 7/11 indicated an additional 9 pound weight loss in one week. Changed appetite stimulant the previous week. The current diet was continued, ice cream was discontinued at lunch and dinner and fortified pudding for lunch and dinner were started. A Physician Order, dated 4/7/2023, indicated Regular diet Dys Adv texture, Regular (None/Thin) consistency, fortified pudding with lunch and dinner. A Care Plan,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen and respiratory equipment use was ordered and care planned for 2 of 28 residents reviewed for respiratory needs. (Resident 28 and 41) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 28 was reviewed on 8/23/2023 at 2:21 P.M. Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included, but not limited to: s/p cerebral vascular disease, hypertensive heart disease, atherosclerotic heart disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, osteoarthritis left knee and hip, chronic gout, hyperlipidemia, dysphagia following cerebral vascular accident and sleep disorder. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident 28, completed on 8/8/2023 indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired,, had not exhibited any behaviors, and required extensive staff assistance of one staff for bed mobility, wheelchair locomotion, dressing and personal hygiene and required the staff assistance of two staff for transfers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-28 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a plan was in place to provide trauma-informed care for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. (Resident 44) Finding includes: 1. The record for Resident 44 was reviewed on 8/22/2023 at 2:44 P.M. Resident 44 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis, including but not limited to: type 1 diabetes mellitus, proliferate diabetic retinopathy without macular edema, legal blindness, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)\, bipolar disorder and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. The following diagnosis were added on 7/7/2023: intermittent explosive disorder and mild cognitive impairment of uncertain or unknown etiology, other problems elated to housing an economic circumstances and problems related to other legal circumstances. The resident was sent for an in patient psychiatric stay on 7/3/2023 and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The initial MDS assessment, completed for the admission assessment, on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was available for administration in 2 of 3 residents reviewed who received anxiolytic (anti-anxiety) medication. (Resident C and G) Finding includes: During an interview, on 8/21/23 at 1:45 P.M., Resident C indicated he was supposed to take 3 medications in a certain time frame, like Valium but with a different name, to keep his leg from spasming. He doesn't believe there is a back up pharmacy and the back up medications in the facility isn't kept full and runs out often. On 8/26/23 at 10:12 A.M., a review of the clinical record for Resident C was conducted. The resident's diagnoses included, but was not limited to: nontraumatic compartment syndrome of left lower extremity, epilepsy, schizoaffective disorder-bipolar, cognitive communication deficit, anxiety and muscle weakness/spasms. A copy of the hand written prescription, dated 5/2/23, indicated .Diazepam 2.5 mg [milligrams] PO [by mouth] in the afternoon A copy of the handwritten prescription, dated 5/2/23, indicated .Diazepam 5 mg [milligrams] PO [by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a pharmacy recommendation for a PRN medication was re-evaluated and signed by a physician for 1 out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. (Resident 11) Finding includes: A record review for Resident 11 was completed on 8/22/2023 at 3:22 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: type 2 diabetes, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, acquired total absence of pancreas, and chronic pain syndrome. A Pharmacy Recommendation, created between 4/1/2023 and 4/5/2023, for Resident 11, indicated .This resident has a PRN order for Compazine. Compazine or prochlorperazine is considered an anti-psychotic though it can be used to treat nausea and vomiting. Therefore, according to federal requirement, a PRN order for Compazine is limited to 14 days. A new PRN order cannot be renewed unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner first evaluates the resident to determine if entering a new order for the PRN medication is appropriate. If Compazine is being used to treat nausea and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure insulin was administered at the correct time for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for insulin administration. (Resident 2) Finding includes: On 8/23/2023 at 10:15 A.M., LPN 5 was notified of the need to observe blood glucose assessments and insulin administration prior to the noon meal. LPN 5 indicated she had three residents on her cart for whom she checked blood sugar levels and administered insulin. LPN indicated she usually completed the assessment between 11:00 - 11: 30 A.M. On 8/23/2023 at 11:15 A.M., LPN 5 was not observed on her nursing unit. She returned to the nursing unit at 11:40 A.M. and indicated she had already assessed blood sugar levels and administered her insulin for the noon meal. Review of the medication administration record for Resident 2, on 8/23/2023 at 3:00 P.M., indicated LPN 5 had administered 3 units of Humalog insulin at 10:45 A.M. Resident 2 was observed lying in his bed awake on 8/23/2023 at 11:30 A.M. He did not have any food and/or drinks other than water on his overbed tray.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of greater than 5% for 3 of 9 residents observed during medication pass. Five medication errors were observed during 39 opportunities. This resulted in a medication error rate of 12.82 percent. (Resident 141, 140, and 83 ) Finding includes: 1. During an observation of a medication administration pass, conducted on 8/22/2023 at 11:01 A.M., QMA 13 removed two Lidocaine 4% patches from a box, dated and signed the patches and administered the patches to the right thigh and right buttocks of Resident 141. Review of the Physician's order for the Resident 141's Lidocaine 4% patches, indicated they were to be applied to the resident's right shoulder and right thigh. 2. During an observation of a medication administration pass, conducted on 8/23/23 at 9:25 A.M., QMA 14 prepared and administered the following medications to Resident 140: Aspirin 81 mg (milligram) one tablet. Daily vitamin, one tablet. Vitamin b1 100 mg. One tablet, Eliquis 5 mg tablet. Folic Acid 1 mg one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-28 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dental services had a dental examination completed (Resident 28) and 2 of 3 residents reviewed for dental needs had dental recommendations completed timely for outside referrals. (Resident 72 and 11) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 28 was reviewed on 8/23/2023 at 2:21 P.M. Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included, but not limited to: status post cerebral vascular disease, hypertensive heart disease, atherosclerotic heart disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, osteoarthritis left knee and hip and age related debility. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident 28, completed on 8/8/2023 indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired,required extensive staff assistance of one staff for personal hygiene and required the staff assistance of two staff for transfers and was totally dependent of one staff for bathing needs. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 nursing staff passing medications followed manufacturer's recommendations for the cleaning of a glucometer. Finding includes: During an observation of a medication pass, conducted on 8/24/2023 at 7:30 A.M., RN 10 washed her hands, took a basket with a glucometer, alcohol swabs, test strips and lancets into Resident 11's room. RN 10 utilized the glucometer to check Resident 11's blood sugar level. After obtaining the resident's blood sugar, the nurse placed the used glucometer back on top of alcohol pads and lancets and placed the basket on top of the medication cart and then placed the whole basket into the medication cart. RN 10 explained she was going to wait until the resident's breakfast tray was delivered before she gave the resident insulin. On 8/24/2023 at 8:00 A.M., RN 10 was observed to sanitize her hands, pull the plastic basket with the used glucometer, alcohol pads and lancets out of her medication cart drawer. She then drew up the dose of insulin for Resident 11. After administering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$116,322 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-07-15
  • $84,256 — penalty dated 2024-07-15
  • $15,265 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-09 for 34 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+15.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 5%Other / private 20%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$322per resident / day
operating cost
$9,797per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$383per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155219. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next