No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

West Bend Nursing And Rehabilitation

4600 W Washington Ave, South Bend, IN 46619 · For profit - Corporation · 157 certified beds · (574) 282-1294 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (574) 282-1294 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Jun 2025
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (18) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1010 N Bendix Dr · (574) 245-4980 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4403 W Western Ave · (574) 234-3241 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4401 W Western Ave · (574) 288-4854 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Lasalle Park · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.2%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.4%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms13.8%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.9%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.7%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.4%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.0%3.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.5%23.3%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.3%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.8%79.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.6%22.2%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit0.0%10.8%12.0%check this — see note marked star below the table

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.011.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.66
RN hours/ resident / day
0.67
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.50
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.83
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
43.1%
Total nursing turnover
11.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 157 beds and averages 65.2 residents a day — about 42% occupied, or roughly 92 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.50 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.13 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-13)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-09)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to prepare food under sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 kitchens. This had the potential to affect 66 out of 67 residents who ate food prepared in the kitchen.Finding includes: During a tour of the kitchen on 3/9/2026 at 9: 38 A.M. with the Culinary Manager (CM) the following was noted:-the wall around the handwashing sink was dirty with brown and yellow spots and drips-3 stainless steel skillets were black and brown colored greasy skillet on both the inside and outside surfaces-and the top of 2 water heaters were covered with dust and debris. During an interview on 3/9/2026 at 9:48 A.M., the CM indicated the wall near the handwashing sink should have been cleaned, they probably should order new frying pans, and the top of the water heaters should have been free of dust and debris. On 3/13/2026 at 10:05 A.M. a current policy, dated 6/2025 and titled Kitchen Cleanliness, was provided by the ED. The policy indicated, .A clean, sanitary, and safe kitchen environment will be maintained at all times to ensure the health and well-being of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment on the 200 Unit for 1 of 3 Units whose environment was observed. (200 Unit)During a continuous observation of the 200 Unit's environment on 3/6/2025 from 9:30 A.M. until 3:30 P.M., and during an environment tour with the Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) on 3/13/2025 at 11:00 A.M., the following was observed:-Two ceiling air vents above the 200 Unit Medication Cart had a heavy build up of dust.-A heavy build up of dust on the blinds and window sills of rooms 208, 216 and 218.-room [ROOM NUMBER] had a dried brown substance on the wall in the corner of the room.-The toilet in room [ROOM NUMBER] had a brown stains inside the bowl 3/6/2026 and had hard water stains on 3/13/2025 inside the bowel.-Used towels and wash clothes were on the floors in the bathroom of rooms 208, 216, 212 and 220. During an interview with the HS on 3/13/2025 at 1:20 A.M., the HS indicated toilets should be cleaned daily, even for residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's responsible party was notified timely of new medication and the risks and benefits of the medication, prior to administration of the medication, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for notification, (Resident B). Finding includes: On 6/18/25 at 9:43 A.M., a telephone interview with the Social Service Director (SSD) at a local dialysis center indicated Resident B received dialysis at the dialysis center on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays and had received dialysis for several months. The SSD indicated the facility had notified the dialysis center, on 3/14/25, that Resident B had been prescribed Ativan (a central nervous system depressants which slows down the nervous system and is used to treat anxiety) before his dialysis appointments. The dialysis SSD indicated Resident B had been coming to dialysis treatments, lethargic and out of it over the past few weeks and, on 5/28/25, she had notified the Director of Nursing and requested a discontinuation of the Ativan medication. The dialysis SSD indicated there was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from chemical restraint related to medication administered for the purpose of calming the resident prior to off-site dialysis treatments, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for chemical restraints, (Resident B). Finding includes: During an observation, on 6/17/25 at 10:18 A.M., Resident B was in the common area of the Memory Care unit seated upright, alert and watching the activities of the other residents in the area. The resident was well-groomed and nicely dressed. The resident showed no signs of any negative behaviors. During an observation, on 6/18/27 at 9:48 A.M., Resident B was in the common area of the Memory Care unit, seated in a chair along with other residents in the area. Resident B was clean, well dressed, appeared alert and showed no signs of negative behaviors. During an interview, on 6/18/25 at 9:43 A.M., with the Social Service Director (SSD) from a local dialysis center, she indicated Resident B received dialysis at the dialysis center on Mondays, Wednesdays, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive plan of care was created timely related to anit-anxiety medication use for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for care plans, (Resident B). Finding includes: During an interview on 6/18/25 at 10:20 A.M., the Memory Care Director indicated on 3/10/25, she was directed by the Director of Nursing to call the facility's Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner to request an order for medication to calm the resident while he received dialysis. The Memory Care Director indicated she had called and made the request to the Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner, who then prescribed Ativan 0.5 mg to be taken by mouth every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday before leaving the facility for dialysis. Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 6/19/25 at 10:00 A.M. Diagnoses included but were not limited, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, chronic kidney disease and adjustment disorder with anxiety. A physician's order, dated from 3/11/25 to 5/28/25, indicated Ativan tablet 0.5 mg to be administered by mouth once a day on Monday,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store and serve food in a sanitary manner in the pantries, dining rooms, kitchen and kitchenettes. This had the potential to affect 57 of 57 residents who consumed food from the kitchen, pantries, dining rooms and kitchenettes. Findings include: 1. During the initial kitchen tour with the Culinary and Nutrition Manager (CNM) on 12/3/2024 at 9:45 A.M., 12/4/2024 at 8:30 A.M., 12/5/2024 at 11:20 A.M. and 12/6/2024 at 8:40 A.M. the following was observed: - the 6 burner gas range had a thick buildup of a black substance on all burner grates and below the grates. -there was a build up of grease on the stainless backsplash surrounding the gas range. -there was a build up of grease on the wall next to the gas burners. -A ceiling vent had a black substance that looked like mold above the stainless steel prep table behind the ovens. -The handwashing sink was dirty with a red colored dried substance on the wall by the soap dispenser. -Two ovens had a build up of a black substance on the inside, and both ovens had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a copy of the Notice of Transfer/Discharge form when residents were transferred and admitted to an acute care facility for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Residents 4 and 16) Findings include: 1. A record review was completed on 10/3/2024 at 2:10 P.M. for Resident 4. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, respiratory failure and heart failure. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/23/2024, indicated Resident 4's cognition was intact. On 10/5/2024 at 6:15 P.M., Nursing Progress notes indicated Resident 4 was found unresponsive. After an assessment and notification to the physician, Resident 4 was sent to the emergency room. Her husband was notified by phone of the transfer but the record lacked documentation that the Notification of Transfer/Discharge form was provided to the resident or her husband. During an interview on 12/05/24 at 2:16 P.M., the ED indicated there was no documentation of the transfer paperwork, including the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a copy of the Bed Hold Policy to residents when admitted to the hospital for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Residents 4 and 16) Findings include: 1. A record review was completed on 10/3/2024 at 2:10 P.M. for Resident 4. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, respiratory failure and heart failure. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/23/2024, indicated Resident 4's cognition was intact. On 10/5/2024 at 6:15 P.M., Nursing Progress Notes indicated Resident 4 was found unresponsive. After an assessment and notification to the physician, Resident 4 was sent to the emergency room. Her husband was notified by phone of the transfer but the record lacked documentation that the Bed Hold Policy was provided to the resident or her husband. During an interview on 12/05/24 at 2:16 P.M., the ED indicated there was no documentation of the transfer paperwork, including the Transfer/Discharge form for Resident 4. 2. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have Care Plan meetings with residents and/or their representatives timely for 2 of 3 residents whose Care Plan meetings were reviewed. (Residents 47 & 38) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 12/03/2024 at 2:13 P.M., Resident 47 indicated he had not been to a Care Plan meeting with the staff. Resident 47's record review was completed on 12/4/2024 at 1:23 P.M. Resident 46 had a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on the following dates: -11/19/2024 Quarterly MDS assessment -8/21/2024 Significant Change MDS assessment -5/31/2024 Quarterly MDS assessment -5/14/2024 Quarterly MDS assessment -3/19/2024 Annual MDS assessment -1/2/2024 Quarterly MDS assessment There was no documentation a Care Plan meeting with Resident 47 had been conducted following any of the MDS assessments, except after the 2/18/2024 Annual MDS assessment. During an interview on 12/5/2024 at 2:34 P.M., the Social Services Director indicated she had met with Resident 47 regularly, but had not had a Care Plan meeting with him following his MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1 of 1 staff (LPN 2) met professional standards regarding signing off dressing changes for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wounds. (Resident 42) Finding includes: During an observation and interview on 12/3/2024 at 9:41 A.M., Resident 42 indicated that she was supposed to get her dressing changed daily, and it had not been completed for two days. She had asked the evening shift to do it, but no one had completed her dressing change. The dressing covering the resident's left above the knee amputation revision wound was dated 11/30/2024. When Resident 42 pulled back the dressing, there was a large amount of reddish- brown thick drainage, an opening in the center of wound and erythema around the whole surgical site. During an observation and interview on 12/3/2024 at 10:12 A.M., LPN 2 indicated the dressing to the left leg was ordered to be changed daily, but the current dressing was dated 11/30, 4 days prior. LPN 2 indicated Resident 42 had went out of the building with a friend on 12/1/2024 and 12/2/2024 and had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 8 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility failed to ensure a resident received a treatment per the physician order for 1 of 3 resident's reviewed for skin condition. (Resident 42) Finding includes: During an observation and interview, on 12/3/2024 at 9:41 A.M., Resident 42 indiated she was supposed to have gotten her dressing changed daily, but it had not been done for the past two days. She indicated she had requested the evening shift staff to complete it, but no one had came to change the dressing. The dressing on her left above the knee amputation site was dated 11/30/2024. The dressing was loose and a large amount of reddish-brown thick drainage was noted when the resident pulled back the edge of the dressing, the center of the wound had an opened area and the tissue around the wound and incision was red. A record review was completed for Resident 42 on 12/4/2024 at 2:00 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: chronic hematogenous osteomyelitis, left femur-distal, infection following a procedure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from antibiotic medication used for an excessive duration for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 41) Finding includes: A record review was completed on 12/5/2024 at 10:00 A.M. for Resident 41. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: acute osteomyelitis of left ankle and foot and stage 2 pressure ulcer on left heel. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/7/2024, indicated Resident 41's cognition was intact and he received antibiotic medication. Current Physician Orders included, but were not limited to, cephalexin (an antibiotic) ordered on 11/28/2024, 500 milligrams by mouth every 8 hours for a urinary tract infection. The antibotic was to have been completed and discontinued on 12/4/2024. A lab report, dated 11/30/2024, indicated a urine specimen showed no bacterial growth as the final result. The facility did not notify the Nurse Practioner, on 11/30/2024 of the need to discontinue the antibiotic treatment. An Event note, dated 12/5/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received fresh ice water per his preference for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for hydration. (Resident 21) Finding includes: During an observation and interview, on 12/4/2024 at 12:05 P.M., Resident 21 indicated he had did not have fresh ice water delivered daily to his room. He indicated he desired to have fresh ice water in his room. He indicated the last date he had water delivered was on 11/13 and 11/29. During an observation and interview, on 12/4/2025 at 1:16 P.M., Resident 21 indicated staff did not pass water and he had to go to the nurse's station and to ask for it in order to have a drink of water. During an observation on 12/5/2025 at 9:42 A.M., there was no cup of water in Resident 21's room. A record review was completed on 12/4/2024 at 2:11 P.M., for Resident 21. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic intracerebral hemmorrhage affecting left dominant side, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure acceptable infection control standards were maintained during a surgical dressing change for 1 of 1 resident observed for a dressing change. (Resident 42) Finding includes: During an observation of a dressing change, on 12/3/2024 at 10:12 A.M., LPN 2 removed the soiled dressing from Resident 42's wound. LPN 2 then removed her gloves, pulled another pair of gloves out of her uniform pocket, donned them and proceeded to clean the resident's wound. Prior to starting the dressing change, LPN 2 had laid the supplies for the dressing change on the residents bed without placing a barrier between the resident's bed and the clean dressing supplies. A record review was completed for Resident 42 on 12/4/2024 at 2:00 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: chronic hematogenous osteomyelitis, left femur-distal, infection following a procedure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic diastolic heart failure, acquired absence of left leg above the knee and acquired absence of right leg above the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a Physician Order indicated a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) as indicated upon admission by the resident and legal representative for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Advance Directives (Resident 43). Finding includes: A record review was completed, on 12/07/2023 at 8:43 A.M., and indicated diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia, anxiety, and depression. A current Physician's Order, dated 3/28/2023, indicated Resident 43 had a Full Code status ordered. A signed POST (Physician's Orders for Scope of Treatment) form dated 9/7/2023 indicated Resident 43 had a Do Not Resuscitate status. A care plan, dated 9/29/2023, indicated Resident 43's legal representative had formulated a Do Not Resuscitate with POST orders. Resident and legal representative preferences regarding advanced directives would be honored. Assess for change in condition as indicated and ensure that the POST form would be completed fully and integrated in Physician's Orders and ensure that POST form is sent to the hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to create a person-centered care plan for 2 of 25 residents whose care plans were reviewed (Residents 1 and 55). Findings include: 1. A record review was completed on 12/7/2023 at 11:39 A.M. Resident 1's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: anxiety disorder, Non-Alzheimer's dementia, pseudobulbar affect, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed. Resident 1's current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Lexapro 20 mg (milligram) tablet oral once a day for depression, and Valium 2 mg tablet 3 times a day for anxiety disorder. A current care plan, dated 2/24/2017, and revised, on 8/22/2018, indicated Resident 1 was displaying signs and symptoms of depression, such as trouble sleeping, feeling tired and having little energy, crying, and tearfulness. Resident 1 indicated she felt bad about herself and had trouble concentrating. Interventions included, but were not limited to: Offer encouragement and support to the the way Resident 1 feels, encourage activities of interest, encourage family…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was provided as ordered, change oxygen equipment and ensure oxygen equipment was dated for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for oxygen use (Resident 52). Finding includes: During an observation, on 12/04/2023 at 11:45 A.M., Resident 52 had undated oxygen tubing and an undated humidification bottle in her room and the oxygen storage bag was dated 11/10/2023. During an observation, on 12/05/2023 at 9:11 A.M., Resident 52 had undated oxygen tubing and an undated humidification bottle in her room and the oxygen storage bag was dated 11/10/2023. During an observation, on 12/6/2023 at 5:55 A.M., no date was found on the oxygen tubing and the humidification bottle was undated and the oxygen tubing bag was dated 11/10/2023. During an observation, on 12/06/223 at 11:18 A.M., no date was on the oxygen tubing or humidification bottle and oxygen storage bag dated 11/10/2023 with staff observed in resident's room. During an interview, on 12/06/2023 at 3:06 P.M., LPN 5 indicated that Resident 52's oxygen tubing and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store refrigerated medications in 1 of 3 medication refrigerators that were observed for drug storage (Cottage Unit). Finding includes: An observation of the medication refrigerator on the Cottage Unit was completed on 12/7/2023 at 8:18 A.M. The medication refrigerator's freezer had a heavy built-up of ice that was melting and causing water to accumulate in a red bin containing resident's medications. During an interview, completed on 12/7/2023 at 8:23 A.M., the Director of Nursing indicated there was water dripping onto resident's medications in the refrigerator, and there should not be. On 12/7/2023 at 10:30 A.M., the Director of Nursing provided a policy, with a revision date of 7/21/2022, and titled, Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications and Biologicals,. The Director Nursing indicated it was the policy currently being used by the facility. The policy indicated, .This Policy sets forth the procedures relating to the storage and expiration dates of medications, biologicals, syringes and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$720K
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 81%Medicare 3%Other / private 16%

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $720K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$370per resident / day
operating cost
$11,252per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$333per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155355. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next