Providence Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 255 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 29.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 156 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 63.3 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.15 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.53 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.35 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.51 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.77 to 0.94 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff assessed a resident with a pressure ulcer and implemented treatments which resulted in harm due to the pressure ulcer worsening from a stage 1 (non-blanchable red intact skin) to a stage 3 (full thickness skin loss where fat tissue may be visible) before pressure ulcer assessments and treatments were started for 1of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident 16). Findings include: On 5/12/25 at 11:23 a.m., during an initial observation and interview Resident 16 indicated he had a sore area on his bottom. On 5/14/25 at 8:46 a.m., the medical record of Resident 16 was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnosis included but were not limited to myocardial infarction type 2 (occurs when there's an imbalance between the heart's oxygen supply and demand, leading to injury or death of heart muscle tissue), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (the lungs are unable to adequately transfer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcers (skin and tissue damage caused by prolonged pressure) were treated timely after admission for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Residents B, C, and D). Findings include:1. Resident B's record was reviewed on 1/15/26 at 11:16 a.m. Census information indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A pre-admission screening tool, dated 10/30/25, indicated the resident had a wound to the right buttock. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/10/25, indicated the resident had an unhealed pressure ulcer. Hospital discharge instructions, signed 11/3/25, indicated, .Wound care-Mepilex [soft foam dressing] on coccyx [tailbone] wound, barrier cream. An admission skin assessment, dated 11/3/25, indicated the resident had a red, scabbed area on the upper mid back. The assessment lacked documentation there was a wound to the buttocks or coccyx. A wound Nurse Practitioner (NP) note, dated 11/5/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was labeled properly and the facility failed to ensure expired medication was disposed of for 2 of 2 medication storage rooms reviewed for medication storage (Resident 49). Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 10:00 a.m., the north hall medication storage room refrigerator contained an opened and undated multi use vial of Aplisol (a clear, colorless solution for injection as an aid in the diagnosis of tuberculosis) solution. During an interview, on [DATE] at 10:02 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) 7 indicated she was not aware of how long the Aplisol was good for once opened, but she was aware it should be dated once opened. 2. On [DATE] at 10:11 a.m., the south hall medication storage room refrigerator contained an opened bottle of Mary's Magic Mouthwash (a compounded oral rinse used to treat mouth sores and pain, often associated with cancer treatment). The bottle contained a label that indicated it was for Resident 49 and was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a delay in treatment after a fall with fracture for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident 27). B. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a treatment order was stopped or clarified after 60 days for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 30). Findings include: A. During an interview, on 5/12/25 at 9:40 a.m., Resident 27's Health Care Representative indicated the resident fell in December 2024 and fractured her hip. They thought the resident was not injured, so she was not sent to the hospital right away. The Health Care Representative indicated she normally placed the resident's walker next to her bed before she left in the evening, but the day the resident fell she had not ensured the walker was next to the resident's bed before she left. The Health Care Representative indicated since the resident's fall she always made sure the resident's walker was next to her bed before…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a root cause analysis was completed and an intervention put in place after falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident 27). Findings include: During an interview, on 5/12/25 at 9:40 a.m., Resident 27's Health Care Representative indicated the resident fell in December 2024 and fractured her hip. They thought the resident was not injured, so she was not sent to the hospital right away. The Health Care Representative indicated she normally placed the resident's walker next to her bed before she left in the evening, but the day the resident fell she had not ensured the walker was next to the resident's bed before she left. The Health Care Representative indicated since the resident's fall she always made sure the resident's walker was next to her bed before leaving for the evening. Resident 27's record was reviewed on 5/15/25 at 9:11 a.m. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 3/14/25, indicated the resident had a severe cognitive impairment and had occasional urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's indwelling urinary catheter (a semi-flexible plastic tube with one end inserted into the bladder) which is attached to a urinary drainage bag (a bag that collects urine) did not touch the floor for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for catheter care (Resident 52). Findings include: On 5/9/25 at 11:18 a.m., during an initial observation and interview Resident 52 indicated he was not sure why he had a catheter, but he thought it may be due to prostate cancer. Observed the resident sitting in a wheelchair in the main dining area. The catheter bag was attached to the bar under the wheelchair and was touching the floor. On 5/9/25 at 12:11 p.m., observed Resident 52 propelling self in wheelchair. Observed catheter bag dragging on the floor under the wheelchair. On 5/13/25 at 9:52 a.m., during interview with Registered Nurse (RN) 5 she indicated the catheter bag should never touch the floor and when she was positioning a drainage bag…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper cleaning and storage of respiratory equipment for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Residents 50 and 270). Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 5/15/25 at 8:53 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) 8 administered a breathing treatment to Resident 50. The nurse removed the breathing treatment mask from the resident at 9:08 a.m., she opened the chamber (this holds the liquid medication) and dumbed out the remaining medication left in the chamber into the trash can and returned the respiratory mask and tubing to a clear plastic bag. Resident 50's record was reviewed on 5/15/25 at 11:07 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a lung disease characterized by airflow obstruction, making it difficult to breathe) with acute exacerbation (a period where COPD symptoms worsen significantly beyond the usual day-to-day experience)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure beard restraints were worn in the kitchen serving area (on the skilled unit) and in the main kitchen food prep area for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. Findings include: 1. During an observation in the kitchen serving area (located on the skilled unit), on 3/11/24 at 11:40 a.m., the Dietary Director was placing whip cream on top of the vanilla and chocolate shakes. The Dietary Director was not wearing a beard restraint and his facial hair was exposed. 2. During an observation in the kitchen serving area, on 3/11/24 at 11:43 a.m., the Dietary Director was placing cinnamon pita chips onto 16 dessert plates from a serving pan. The Dietary Director was not wearing a beard restraint and his facial hair was exposed. During an interview, on 3/11/24 at 11:50 a.m., Dietary Director indicated he should have worn a beard restraint while prepping food that was to be served to the residents. During an interview, on 3/11/24 at 11:54 a.m., Dietary aide 5 indicated when you have facial hair it was to be covered with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to accurately assess and document impairments in skin for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for skin impairments (Resident 15). Finding includes: During an observation, on 3/12/24 at 10:21 a.m., Resident 15 was sitting in her wheelchair in her room. The resident indicated she had a sore area behind her right ear, and it had been there for a long time. The resident indicated she thought it was caused by her glasses. A couple of scabbed areas were noted behind her right ear underneath where her glasses touched her skin. Excoriated skin tissue was noted as well. The resident also had a scabbed area on her cheek and nose and indicated she was told they were skin cancer spots. Resident 15's record was reviewed on 3/15/24 at 1:36 p.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgement), disorder of the skin and subcutaneous tissue (medical condition that occurs in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to address a significant weight discrepancy for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 57). Finding includes: Resident 57s record was reviewed on 3/15/24 at 9:08 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition (a disorder caused by a lack of proper nutrition or an inability to absorb nutrients from food) and cerebral infarction (occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it). An admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 2/21/24, indicated the resident required supervision or touching assist with eating, and had no swallowing or nutrition disorders noted. The assessment lacked documentation of weight gain or loss. A physician's order, dated 2/14/24, indicated weekly weights and to review weights and report significant changes to physician. A physician's order, dated 2/16/24, indicated the resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a nebulizer (a small machine that turns liquid medicine into a mist that can be easily inhaled) mask was stored properly when not in use and an self administration assessment was completed for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident 113), and failed to ensure oxygen orders were in place for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident 39). Findings include: 1. During the initial pool observation, on 3/11/24 at 11:24 a.m., Resident 113's nebulizer mask was observed un-bagged and sitting on his bedside table. At the same time, the resident indicated he had used the nebulizer earlier that morning and that it should have been placed into a bag, but the nurse had not been in since he had used the nebulizer. During a random observation, on 3/14/24 at 10:09 a.m., the resident's nebulizer mask was observed un-bagged and sitting on his bedside table. During a random observation, on 3/14/24 at 1:42 p.m., the resident's nebulizer was sitting, un-bagged on his bedside table. At the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-17 for 43 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN