Majestic Care Of Terre Haute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 56 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 39% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 77.3 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.58 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess, prevent, and treat skin conditions for 1of 7 residents reviewed for daily care needs (Resident L). Findings include:On 2/4/26 at 2:40 p.m., observed Resident L sitting in the activity lounge participating in Bingo. The residents hair was uncombed and very disheveled. Her clothing was stained with food. A splint brace was on the right wrist and the resident indicated it was not hurting her. She moved her left arm and wrist freely and indicated she was not having pain in the wrist or arm. She was alert and answered questions appropriately. When asked if she had received a shower today she indicated she had received a shower the previous evening. On 2/4/26 at 10:30 a.m., the medical record of Resident L was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Admitting diagnosis included but was not limited to psychotic disorder (a serious mental illness that causes a person to lose touch with reality, making it hard for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired foods were disposed of and failed to ensure food was labeled properly in the walk-in refrigerator for 1 of 2 kitchen observations, and failed to ensure facial hair was covered with hair restraints during 1 of 2 kitchen observations. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 68 out of 69 residents who consumed food out of the kitchen. Findings include:1. During the initial tour of the kitchen, on 9/7/25 at 9:48 a.m., [NAME] 6 identified the dry storage area. The following items were noted on the top shelf of the bread rack:a. A moldy unopened package of hamburger buns. b. An entire loaf of French bread that contained mold. c. A package of sliced raisin bread with a use by date of 8/29/25.d. A 1/2 package of sliced raisin bread with a use by date of 8/29/25.e. Two unopened loaves of sliced raisin bread with a use by date of 8/29/25.During an interview, on 9/7/25 at 10:00 a.m. [NAME] 6 indicated the bread should have been discarded because it was past the use by date and was moldy. In…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure fingernail care (Residents 4, 5, and 10) and shaving (Resident 52) was provided to residents who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) care for 4 of 24 residents reviewed for ADLs. Findings include:1. On 9/7/25 at 11:13 a.m., Resident 4 was observed with long, jagged fingernails on both hands. The resident's fingernails had chipped nail polish and dark debris underneath them. On 9/8/25 at 11:48 a.m., Resident 4 was observed with long, jagged fingernails on both hands. The resident's fingernails had chipped nail polish and dark debris underneath them. Resident 4's record was reviewed on 9/8/25 at 3:16 p.m. Diagnoses on the resident's profile included, but were not limited to, dementia a general term for a group of conditions that cause a progressive decline in cognitive functions, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and problem-solving) and type two diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition in which the body does…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer (a localized area of tissue damage that develops when prolonged pressure is applied to the skin, usually over a bony prominence) dressing changes were performed with appropriate hand hygiene (Residents 4 and 43), pressure ulcers were staged accurately, and treatments were adjusted when a wound changed (Resident 4) for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include:1. On 9/9/25 at 10:03 a.m., the Wound Nurse was observed completing Resident 4's pressure ulcer dressing change, assisted by Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) 11 and 13. The Wound Nurse put on a gown and gloves prior to entering Resident 4's room and was not observed to have washed her hands. The Wound Nurse knocked on the resident's door, opened the door, and carried the dressing supplies into the room with her gloved hands. The Wound Nurse placed the supplies directly on the resident's bedside table, with no barrier between the supplies and the table. The Wound Nurse was not observed to clean the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely documentation and reporting regarding change of resident condition for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for catheter (a thin, flexible catheter used especially to drain urine from the bladder). (Resident 65) Findings include:On 9/07/25 at 12:05 p.m., during interview and observation, Resident 65 had a suprapubic catheter (SPC, a tube that drains urine from the bladder by inserting it through a small incision in the lower abdomen and into the bladder). Resident 65 indicated he did not know why he had a catheter, it was not draining now, and it was leaking. No urine was observed in the tubing or the drainage bag (a collection bag used to drain and store urine).On 9/7/25 at 1:00 p.m., the medical record of Resident 65 was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. admission diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes (a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was cleaned and stored appropriately after use for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care (Resident 27). Findings include:On 9/07/2025 11:34 a.m., during an initial observation, observed Resident 27 lying in bed. Observed undated nebulizer equipment (a main nebulization unit, a reservoir for holding the liquid for nebulization, and a mouthpiece through which drug aerosol is inhaled), unbagged next to the bedside table. Observed an oxygen storage bag on the bedside table dated 8/25/25.On 9/08/2025 at 10:00 a.m., observed undated nebulizer equipment unbagged on the bedside table of Resident 27.On 9/09/2025 at 9:00 a.m., observed nebulizer mask and tubing unbagged lying in Resident 27 bed. On 9/9/25 at 9:30 a.m., reviewed the medical record of Resident 27. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. admission diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and medications were dated when opened for 2 of 2 observations. Findings include:On 9/7/25 at 9:50 a.m., observed unattended medications on the counter at the nurses' station. The prescription label indicated the medications were for Resident 47. The resident was discharged from the facility 9/7/25.On 9/7/25 at 9:55 a.m., during interview Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 5 indicated the medications should not be left unattended at the nurses' station. She indicated the resident had just passed away and the medications were removed and left there. She indicated they should have been in the pharmacy.On 9/7/25 at 2:19 p.m., during interview RN 8 the medication cart and computer screen must be locked when she was not at the medication cart.On 9/9/25 at 1:18 p.m., observed 200 hall pharmacy medication room with LPN 5. Observed an opened and undated vial of Aplisol Tuberculin testing solution in the refrigerator. The LPN indicated the vial should have been dated when opened.On 9/7/25 at 11:45 a.m., the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that medications were documented as administered, for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 1). Findings include:Resident 1's record was reviewed on 9/8/25 at 2:39 p.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition where the body does not use insulin effectively or does not produce enough insulin) and hypothyroidism (a condition where the thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid hormone). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/11/25, indicated the resident had no cognitive deficit and had no documented behavior of refusals of care. A review of the resident's care plan lacked documentation of the resident refusal of medications, treatments, or care. A physician's order, dated 6/4/25, indicated to administer 8 units of Insulin Glargine medication to treat diabetes 100 units per milliliter (ml) at bedtime for diabetes. The July 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) lacked documentation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect, when the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided adequate monitoring and care for 8 hours for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for neglect (Resident B). Findings include: During a confidential interview, on [DATE] at 6:33 p.m., the interviewee indicated Resident B was not provided monitoring or care from 7:14 p.m. the night of [DATE] until 4:06 a.m. the morning of [DATE]. Resident B was found deceased in her bed in her room by staff at 4:06 a.m. on [DATE]. The family was notified of the death at 4:12 a.m. The family arrived at the facility 21 minutes after they received the call, and Resident B was cold and hard to the touch. The family had installed motion sensor video cameras in the room that verified staff had not checked on the resident for 8 hours. The video was only activated on [DATE] at 7:13 p.m. and then again at [DATE] at 4:06 a.m. Those were the only 2 times staff were noted to be in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a sanitary manner for 1 of 2 kitchen observations. This had the potential to affect 35-38 residents who ate meals from the kitchen. Finding includes: During a continuous kitchen observation of the puree (a smooth, crushed, or blended food that has the consistency of a creamy paste or liquid) food preparation, on 8/27/24 at 10:31 a.m. to 10:50 a.m., [NAME] 11 washed her hands at the sink for less than 20 seconds and began to scoop vegetables into a plastic container to puree them. She proceeded to scoop chicken broth into the container as well. [NAME] 11 turned on the puree blender and then went over to the steam table to scoop roasted potatoes and chicken broth into another plastic container to puree that was drying on the counter, she grabbed a paper towel to dry it further. She turned on the potatoes and then went back to the vegetables to see if they were completed. The cook had to add thickener to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN