Westminster Village Health & Rehab
1120 E Davis Dr, Terre Haute, IN 47802 · Non profit - Corporation · 78 certified beds · (812) 232-7533 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.5% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 11.0% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.9% | 1.1% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.5% | 25.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.4% | 3.9% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 23.7% | 11.9% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.6% | 23.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.9% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.0% | 3.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.6% | 23.3% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.1% | 13.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 1.2% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.0% | 79.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.5% | 22.2% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.8% | 10.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.97 | 1.61 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.76 | 1.44 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
57.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 131 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 43.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 69 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 57.0%CMS range 50.2–64.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.8%CMS range 8.8–16.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 43.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 46.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 37.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.4% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.2%CMS range 6.0–14.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.88 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 70.2 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.77 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.02 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.99 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.98 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.21 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2026-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was mechanically transferred safely resulting in harm when a resident had a fall from the mechanical lift and had a left clavicle fracture and laceration to the back of the head for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls (Resident C). The deficient practice was corrected by 3/8/26 prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past Noncompliance. Findings include:A Facility Reported Incident (FRI), dated 3/9/26 at 4:14 p.m., indicated Resident C had a fall during a mechanical lift transfer. Staff administered first aid and pain management and transferred the resident to the emergency room for further evaluation and treatment for a left clavicle fracture and laceration to the back of her head. Resident C's clinical record was reviewed on 3/12/26 at 10:10 a.m. Diagnoses on Resident C's profile included metabolic encephalopathy, history of stroke, muscle weakness, and respiratory failure. A 5-day scheduled Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed on 1/18/26, assessed the resident as being severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a physician was notified of STAT (immediate) lab results and a resident's change in condition related to low platelet count and increased confusion for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident B). Findings include:During an interview on 6/25/26 at 9:22 a.m., Resident B indicated he had been sent out to the hospital a couple of times in the month of May 2026. During an interview on 6/29/26 at 3:53 p.m., Resident B indicated he could not recall how he was feeling the days prior to being sent out to the hospital, I was completely out of it. During a confidential phone interview on 6/29/26 at 4:18 p.m., Resident B's family member indicated they had visited the resident at the long-term care facility on the night of 5/9/26. They were concerned about the resident because he was seeing things that weren't there and talking out of his head. The family member indicated they had spoken to Resident B earlier in the week on the phone and the resident didn't sound right at that time. The resident was known to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to indicate the full code status of a resident upon admission to the facility according to a POST (physician's order for scope of treatment) form for 1 of 24 records reviewed. (Resident 271) Findings include: On 4/22/25 at 9:45 a.m., the medical record of Resident 271 was reviewed. The medical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, infection and inflammation and inflammatory reaction due to other internal joint prosthesis (a medical device, typically an artificial joint, designed to replace or improve the function of a damaged or diseased natural joint), methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus infection (a bacterial infection), and hypertension (high blood pressure). A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/24/25, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact. A physician order, dated 4/17/25, indicated that the resident chose to be a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation of a resident's transfer included a progress note with pertinent information that the resident was being transferred to the hospital and the facility failed to ensure report was called to the emergency room for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization (Resident 7). Findings include: During an interview, on 4/22/25 at 8:52 a.m., Resident 7 indicated she had been transferred to the hospital a couple of times in the last few months. Resident 7's record was reviewed on 4/23/25 at 8:59 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities causing significant impairment in daily life), heart failure (can occur if the heart cannot pump or fill adequately), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- term for lung and airway diseases that restrict your breathing). Resident 7's census information indicated she was transferred to the hospital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the timely transmission of a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 21 residents MDS assessments reviewed (Resident 56). Findings include: Resident 56's closed record was reviewed on 4/24/25 at 8:53 a.m. The record indicated the resident had been admitted to the facility, on 11/25/24, for diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a group of lung diseases that cause progressive airflow obstruction and breathing difficulties) and congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition where the heart muscle is weakened and cannot pump blood effectively enough to meet the body's needs). The resident had been discharged back to his home with Home Health Care (medical care provided to individuals in their own homes) on 1/4/25. An admission MDS assessment, dated 12/11/24, indicated the resident had no cognitive deficit, required extensive assistance with his activities of daily living (ADLs-fundamental self-care tasks necessary for daily living, such as eating, bathing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were coded accurately regarding the residents' dental status for 2 of 21 MDS Assessments reviewed (Residents 11 and 15). Findings include: 1. On 4/21/25 at 11:27 a.m., Resident 11 was observed with broken and missing teeth. Resident 11's record was reviewed on 4/22/25 at 2:43 p.m. A significant change MDS Assessment, dated 3/6/25, lacked documentation the resident had obvious likely cavities or broken natural teeth. A care plan, initiated on 1/25/24, indicated the resident had the potential for oral and dental problems related to missing teeth and needed assistance with oral care. During an interview, on 4/23/25 at 9:23 a.m., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 6 indicated the resident was missing the two front middle teeth on the bottom of her mouth, and there were a couple of other teeth on either side of those that were broken down. 2. During a lunch meal observation, on 4/21/25 at 12:19 p.m., Resident 15's upper dentures were observed to be very loose. The dentures fell…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan related to dementia care and resident specific interventions were implemented for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dementia care (Resident 20). Findings include: On 4/22/25 at 2:44 p.m., the medical record of Resident 20 was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Admitting diagnoses included but were not limited to, unspecified dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning thinking, remembering, and reasoning to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), psychotic disturbance (when someone experiences a significant disconnection from reality), mood disturbance (a mental health condition where a person's emotional state is significantly and negatively affected), and anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness). A care plan, dated 11/6/24, indicated that the resident had potential to demonstrate verbally abusive behaviors related to anxiety including false accusations,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure timely treatment for a urinary tract infection (UTI) (Resident 53) and to ensure Foley catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) tubing and drainage bag were not in contact with the floor (Resident 25) for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for catheters. Findings include: 1. Resident 53's record was reviewed on [DATE] at 11:54 a.m. Diagnoses on the resident's profile included, but were not limited to UTI and extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) (enzyme produced by some bacteria that makes them resistant to certain antibiotics). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], indicated the resident had a severe cognitive impairment and an indwelling catheter. A urinalysis (UA) culture and sensitivity (C&S) report indicated the urine specimen was collected on [DATE], and the results were reported to the facility on [DATE]. The UA and C&S indicated two types of bacteria were isolated. Progress Notes, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to address a significant weight discrepancy for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 25). Findings include: Resident 25's record was reviewed on 4/22/25 at 1:15 p.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure (the heart is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), unspecified fracture of the left femur (indicates a broken left thigh bone, but the specific fracture isn't detailed), and vascular parkinsonism (caused by vascular damage, specifically small strokes or cerebrovascular disease, in the brain regions controlling movement). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/8/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and required a one person assist with bed mobility and transfers. A physician order, dated 10/4/24, indicated daily weights every dayshift. Notify doctor of 3 lb (pound) weight gain or more overnight or 5 lb weight gain in one week. A physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of respiratory equipment for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident 2). Findings include: On 4/21/25 at 10:35 a.m., during an initial observation of Resident 2. Observed oxygen concentrator (a medical device that separates nitrogen from the surrounding air, providing a higher concentration of oxygen for breathing) in the resident's room. There was not a date on the oxygen tubing. The tubing was unbagged and draped over the oxygen concentrator. On 4/21/25 at 2:57 p.m., observed Resident 2 in her room sitting in recliner. Oxygen (O2) was being administered through an oxygen concentrator. Observed the equipment storage bag on the portable oxygen tank (a small, easily transportable container filled with compressed oxygen) dated 4/7/25. On 4/21/25 at 2:57 p.m., in Resident 2's room observed nebulizer (an electrically powered machine that turns liquid medication into a mist so that it can be breathed directly into the lungs through a face mask or mouthpiece) equipment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident or his responsible party was issued a 30-day notice of transfer or discharge when he was not permitted to return to the facility when the emergency room (ER) determined he did not meet criteria for hospital admission for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care (Resident B). Findings include: During an interview, on 3/20/25 at 11:19 a.m., Hospital Employee 8 indicated Resident B presented to the ER, on 2/20/25, and the facility reported the resident had aggressive behaviors. The resident did not have behaviors in the ER, and there was no medical reason to admit him to the hospital, so they attempted to send him back to the facility. The Administrator refused to allow him to return to the facility and indicated they would not accept him back until he had a psychiatric evaluation. The resident had recently had a medication change at the facility, and the hospital provider thought the behaviors might have been due to the change.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was allowed to return to the facility after an emergency room (ER) visit due to behaviors once the hospital determined the resident did not meet the criteria for hospital admission for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care (Resident B). Findings include: During an interview, on 3/20/25 at 11:19 a.m., Hospital Employee 8 indicated Resident B presented to the ER, on 2/20/25, and the facility reported the resident had aggressive behaviors. The resident did not have behaviors in the ER, and there was no medical reason to admit him to the hospital, so they attempted to send him back to the facility. The Administrator refused to allow him to return to the facility and indicated they would not accept him back until he had a psychiatric evaluation. The resident had recently had a medication change at the facility, and the hospital provider thought the behaviors might have been due to the change. Hospital Employee 8 notified the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident-centered behavior management care plan was developed and interventions were identified and attempted during behavioral episodes prior to the resident being transferred to the emergency room (ER) for behaviors for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care (Resident B). Findings include: During an interview, on 3/20/25 at 11:19 a.m., Hospital Employee 8 indicated Resident B presented to the ER, on 2/20/25, and the facility reported the resident had aggressive behaviors. The resident did not have behaviors in the ER, and there was no medical reason to admit him to the hospital, so they attempted to send him back to the facility. The Administrator refused to allow him to return to the facility and indicated they would not accept him back until he had a psychiatric evaluation. The resident had recently had a medication change, and the hospital provider thought the behaviors might have been due to the change. The Hospital Employee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in a sanitary manner on 3 of 3 kitchen observations. Findings include: On 3/20/24 at 9:43 a.m., during initial dietary observation. Observed the following. a. Employee 5 had a beard cover not covering all of his mustache b. Food on the steam table was uncovered c. Debris on the floor throughout food prep area d. Dark debris on the outside and inside of the food warmer. Dried dark debris on the inside and bottom of the convection oven e. Review of dishwasher temperature log indicated the documentation from 1/1/24 to 3/20/24 lacked entries of wash temperatures. The Dietary Director was unable to provide a dishwasher temperature log for 2/15/24 to 2/29/24. On 3/20/24 at 11:58 a.m., During routine dining observation in the 1st floor dining room, observed, Employee 6, wash his hands and turned the water off with his bare hand. On 3/20/24 at 12:10 p.m., observed Employee 3 wash her hands and turn off water with bare hands. On 3/20/24 at 12:14 p.m., observed Employee 6 serving food without gloves on while…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a supporting diagnosis for an indwelling Foley Catheter (a thin, flexible catheter used especially to drain urine from the bladder) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for catheters (Resident 52). Findings include: On 3/21/24 at 9:10 a.m., during observation and interview with Resident 52, the resident indicated the indwelling Foley catheter was placed when she was in the hospital, but she could not recall why she had a catheter and indicated she had not had a catheter prior to going to the hospital. On 3/27/24 at 2:00 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the facility did not obtain a supporting diagnosis when the resident returned from the hospital because they were waiting on the follow-up appointment with urology to obtain the diagnosis. She indicated the physician would not give them the diagnosis and referred them to urology. On 3/25/24 at 11:27 a.m., Resident 52's record was reviewed. Diagnosis included but were not limited to, displaced fracture of the lower end of right femur (a break in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to address a significant weight discrepancy for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 1). Finding includes: Resident 1's record was reviewed on 3/22/24 at 10:29 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified diastolic (congestive) heart failure (occurs if the left ventricle muscle becomes still or thickened), cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (a left-brain stroke happens when blood supply to left side of brain is stopped. The left side of brain is in charge of the right side of the body), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe). An annual minimum data set assessment (MDS- part of the federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes), dated 3/7/24, indicated the resident had impairment on one side. The assessment lacked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a post dialysis assessment was completed on 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident 23). Finding includes: Resident 23's record was reviewed on 3/25/24 at 1:26 p.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease (a condition in which the kidneys lose the ability to remove waste and balance fluids), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a long term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), and hemiplegia and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body that can affect the arms, legs, and facial muscles). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (MDS-part of the federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes), dated 1/11/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and was marked as being on dialysis. A physician order, dated 2/17/23, resident to receive dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, leaving at 6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure verbal physician's orders were counter signed per pharmacy recommendations for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 37 and 11). Findings include: 1. On 3/22/24 at 8:55 a.m., record reviewed for resident 37. Record indicated diagnosis included but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high), vascular dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning thinking, remembering, and reasoning to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), focal epilepsy (a disorder of the brain characterized by repeated seizures), hypertension (high blood pressure), hypothyroidism (a common condition where the thyroid doesn't create and release enough thyroid hormone into your bloodstream. This makes your metabolism slow down. Also called underactive thyroid). Physician Orders included but were not limited to, Cyanocobalamin Tablet 1000 mcg (micrograms) by mouth one time a day related to vitamin B…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure verbal physician's orders, for psychotropic medications (medications or other substances that affect how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behavior) had been signed by the physician for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 47 and 16). Findings include: 1. Resident 47's record was reviewed on 3/21/24 at 2:07 p.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease (a progressive disorder that affects the nervous system and the parts of the body controlled by the nerves), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), anxiety disorder (a condition in which a person has excessive worry and feelings of fear, dread, and uneasiness), and borderline personality disorder (a mental health condition in which a person has long-term patterns of unstable or explosive emotions). A quarterly minimum data set assessment (MDS-part of the federally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled properly and the facility failed to ensure expired medications were disposed for 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage (Residents 47 and 14). Findings include: 1. On 3/25/24 at 9:01 a.m., the 200 hall second medication cart contained an undated and opened Lispro (medication used to lower blood sugar) insulin pen. The insulin pen contained a label that indicated it was for Resident 47. The cart also contained a Lantus (insulin medication) insulin pen that had an open date of 2/22/24. The insulin pen contained a label that indicated it was for Resident 47. During an interview, on 3/25/24 at 9:04 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 7 indicated insulin pens should have an open date placed on them when they are used, and insulin medication was good for 28 days once it was opened. The insulin pen that was dated for 2/22/24 should have been discarded. Resident 47's record was reviewed on 3/25/24 at 10:48 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a separation between clean linen, from the soiled linen area for 1 of 1 observation of the laundry area. Finding include: On 3/26/24 at 9:36 a.m., during observation of the soiled laundry area, several barrels containing linens were uncovered, which had been placed against the wall in front of the washing machines. The washing machines were in use with soiled laundry at the time of the observation. On 3/26/24 at 9:45 a.m., during interview with Employee 12, the employee indicated the linens and clothing within the laundry barrels had been washed and were clean. She indicated she was waiting to put them into the dryer. The employee indicated she was aware the lids had not been placed on the barrel to protect the clean linen and acknowledged the barrels containing the washed clean linen, were within the soiled laundry area. On 3/26/2024 at 10:08 a.m., the Administrator provided a document, titled, Laundry and Bedding, Soiled, dated September 2022, and indicated it was the policy currently being used by the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided showers as preferred for 1 of 24 residents reviewed for choices (Resident 100). Finding includes: During an interview, on 1/5/23 at 2:01 p.m., Resident 100's wife indicated, her husband had not had a shower since Sunday, 1/1/23. The resident took showers daily and sometimes two showers a day, morning and evening, prior to his admission into the facility, when he was at home. Resident 100's record was reviewed on 1/13/23 at 10:31 a.m. The resident was admitted to the facility, on 12/30/22, with diagnoses included, but not limited to, heart failure, acute and chronic respiratory failure (difficulty breathing), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-chronic condition involving constriction of the airways and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/5/23, indicated the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment, it was very important for the resident to choose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-18 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure documented evidence of notification to the receiving hospital prior to the transfer of a resident for evaluation and treatment for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Residents 9). Finding includes: Resident 9's record was reviewed on 1/13/23 at 2:32 p.m. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/2/22, indicated the resident had a severe cognitive impairment. Diagnoses on the resident's profile included, but was not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic condition involving constriction of the airways and difficulty or discomfort in breathing) and respiratory failure. Census information indicated Resident 9 had been discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. A progress note, dated 11/22/22 at 5:45 a.m., indicated Resident 9 kept calling out for her mom. The nurse had witnessed the resident attempting to transfer self out of the bed and stated that she wanted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-18 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure transfer/discharge documents were developed and provided for hospital transfers for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident 48 and 9), and notification of the transfer/discharge was provided to the Ombudsman for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident 9). Findings include: 1. Resident 48's closed record was reviewed on 1/17/23 at 9:28 a.m. The profile indicated the resident had been admitted to the facility for diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic condition involving constriction of the airways and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), heart failure (a chronic, progressive condition in which the heart muscle is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's need for blood), and was positive for COVID-19. A discharge, return not anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/28/22, indicated the resident had an unplanned discharge to an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-18 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a bed hold policy was provided to a resident with a hospitalization for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Resident 9). Finding includes: Resident 9's record was reviewed on 1/13/23 at 2:32 p.m. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/2/22, indicated the resident had a severe cognitive impairment. Diagnoses on the resident's profile included, but was not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-chronic condition involving constriction of the airways and difficulty or discomfort in breathing) and respiratory failure (difficulty breathing). Census information indicated Resident 9 had been discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE] and the resident had been discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. A progress note, dated 11/15/22 at 11:38 a.m., indicated staff had reported to the physician Resident 9 had right and left upper lung lobe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided to a dependent resident for 1 of 24 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) (daily tasks related to resident care and hygiene) (Resident 2). Finding includes: On 1/4/23 at 12:25 p.m., Resident 2 was observed, with long, untrimmed fingernails with dark debris underneath the fingernails on bilateral (both) hands, while lying in bed, feeding himself lunch from a bedside table. On 1/5/23 at 11:50 a.m., Resident 2 was observed with long, untrimmed fingernails with dark debris underneath the fingernails on both hands, while lying in bed watching television. On 1/6/23 at 3:11 p.m., Resident 2 was observed in his room lying in bed with long, untrimmed fingernails with dark debris underneath the fingernails on both of his hands. Resident 2's clinical record was reviewed on 1/10/23 at 1:15 p.m. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/9/22, indicated the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance of two person for bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and treat a Resident's two pressure ulcers present upon admission into the facility for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident 100). Finding includes: During an interview, on 1/5/21 at 10:02 a.m., Resident 100 indicated he had been admitted to the facility from another facility, on 12/30/22, with two pressure ulcers on his bottom. The other facility had changed the dressings. Resident 100's record was reviewed on 1/13/23 at 10:31 a.m. The resident was admitted to the facility, on 12/30/22, with diagnoses included, but not limited to, heart failure, acute and chronic respiratory failure (difficulty breathing), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-chronic condition involving constriction of the airways and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). A Clinical admission Assessment, dated 12/30/22 at 4:32 p.m., indicated the resident did not have any pressure ulcers upon admission to the facility. A physician order, dated 12/30/22, indicated pressure reducing chair cushion and pressure reducing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Resident, who had experienced significant weight loss, received a physician and registered dietician ordered health shake supplement for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for weight loss (Resident 9). Finding includes: Resident 9's record was reviewed on 1/13/23 at 2:32 p.m. A quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the resident had a severe cognitive impairment; impaired hearing; required extensive assistance of one staff for eating, bed mobility, transfers, locomotion, dressing, person hygiene, toilet use, and bathing; weight loss, and had two hospitalizations. Diagnoses on the resident's profile included, but was not limited to, Non-Alzheimer's dementia (mental disorder in which a person loses the ability to think, remember, learn, make decisions, and solve problems), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-chronic condition involving constriction of the airways and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), respiratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed related to monitoring a resident's daily weight and the assessment of his fistula as ordered for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly), (Resident 29). Findings include: Resident 29's record was reviewed on 1/10/23 at 9:53 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease (a medical condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for a regular course of long-term dialysis or a kidney transplant to maintain life). An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/11/22, indicated the resident required dialysis services. A care plan, dated 5/19/22 and revised on 11/18/22, indicated the resident received hemodialysis (a treatment to filter wastes and water from your blood) through a fistula (a connection that's made between an artery and a vein for dialysis access) in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure documentation of the administration of medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 18). Findings include: Resident 18's record was reviewed on 1/6/23 at 3:03 p.m. The profile indicated the resident diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hyperlipidemia (known as high cholesterol, when there are too many lipids [fats] in the blood), gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD-when stomach acid repeatedly flows back into the tube connecting your mouth and stomach [esophagus]), and restless leg syndrome (causes unpleasant or uncomfortable sensations in the legs and an irresistible urge to move them). Review of the resident's December 2022 and January 2023 medication administration records (MARs) indicated the following: a. A physician's order, dated 3/29/22, indicated atorvastatin calcium tablet (a medication used to lower cholesterol) 40 milligrams (mg), by mouth at bedtime. The December 2022 MAR lacked documentation of the medication having been administered on the evening shifts…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure documented physician rationale for a declination of a gradual dose reduction (GDR) of a psychotropic medication (a drug or other substance that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behavior) and documentation of the administration of psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 18). Findings include: Resident 18's record was reviewed on 1/6/23 at 3:03 p.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, delusional disorders (a type of mental health condition in which a person can't tell what's real from what's imagined), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and abnormal weight loss. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/1/22, indicated the resident had a mood severity score (also known as PHQ-9. A questionnaire to assist in determination of depression severity) and received medications which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-01-18 · tag F0641 — widespreadEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 4 of 18 residents' MDS assessments reviewed (Residents 18, 5, 14, and 8). Findings include: 1. Resident 18's record was reviewed on 1/6/23 at 3:03 p.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, delusional disorder (a type of mental health condition in which a person can't tell what's real from what's imagined) and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). A physician's order, dated 8/25/22, indicated olanzapine (antipsychotic medication used to manage symptoms of mental health conditions such as: seeing, hearing, feeling, or believing things that others do not), 2.5 milligram (mg), by mouth at bedtime. A physician's order, dated 8/26/22, indicated olanzapine 5 mg by mouth one time daily. The December 2022 medication administration record (MAR) indicated the physician's orders for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/01/2017 |
| AULBACH, KENNY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| BACON, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 04/01/2017 |
| BURKETT, KIPLAND | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 04/01/2017 |
| BYRNE, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 04/01/2017 |
| MOHR, GERALD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| SPURLIN, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2021 |
| JARMAN, RONALD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| KINDER, ASHLEY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 05/01/2020 |
| SMITH, BRADLEY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/2017 |
| WESTMINSTER VILLAGE TERRE HAUTE INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2017 |
| MATTHEWS, COLLEEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/03/2022 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155221. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.