Westridge Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 30.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 42.6 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's change in condition after a fall was assessed and treated which resulted in harm of a resident who had delayed treatment for a fractured right femur (thigh bone) that required surgery for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident 8). Findings include:During an interview, on 3/15/26 at 1:33 p.m., Resident 8 indicated she had constant pain and recently had a fall and was hurt. Resident 8's record was reviewed on 3/17/26 at 11:56 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, moderate, with mood disorder (fixed, false beliefs strongly held despite clear evidence to the contrary, often stemming from mental health, neurological, or substance-related conditions), major depressive disorder (serious mental health condition characterized by persistent sadness, hopelessness, and a loss of interest in activities lasting at least two weeks), right femur fracture (severe…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and their representatives participated in care plan meetings (a documented meeting where a resident, their family, and a team of health professionals meet to discuss the resident's goals, preferences, and necessary care services), for 4 of 16 residents reviewed for care plan meetings (Residents 41, 40, 1, and 8). Findings include:1. During an interview, on 3/15/26 at 12:53 p.m., Resident 41's brother indicated he was the resident Power of Attorney (POA-a legal document that allows someone else to act on another individual's behalf) and responsible party. He indicated he attended a care plan meeting right after the resident was admitted but had not known about or attended a meeting since that time. At the same time, the resident indicated she could not remember having a meeting since that time as well. Resident 41's record was reviewed on 3/18/26 at 8:43 a.m. The census indicated that the resident had been admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medication consents were obtained for the initiation of or increase of psychotropic medications for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 1 and 30). Findings include: 1. Resident 1's record was reviewed on 3/16/26 at 10:18 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, depression, schizoaffective disorder (a chronic mental health condition combining symptoms of schizophrenia with a mood disorder such as depression or bipolar disorder), and fibromyalgia (a chronic multi system disorder characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain, profound fatigue, and cognitive difficulties). Facility census information indicated the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/19/26, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and received anti-psychotic and anti-depressant medications during the look back…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Registered Dietitian (RD) recommendations were addressed by the physician and ordered interventions were implemented to prevent weight loss for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for weight loss (Resident 11). Findings include:On 3/15/26 at 10:30 a.m., during an initial observation, observed Resident 11 sitting up in bed drinking water from a two handle cup. The resident was alert with slow verbal response. Noted while drinking she was coughing frequently. Liquid was noted to be thin consistency. On 3/15/26 at 1:44 p.m., the medical record of Resident 11 was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but not limited to, dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning thinking, remembering, and reasoning to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), hypertension (high blood pressure) and anorexia (a serious, potentially fatal eating disorder characterized by an intense…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for an assessment of a resident's dialysis access site ( surgically prepared area on the body that allows easy, high-volume access to the bloodstream for filtering blood during hemodialysis [a medical treatment that acts as an artificial kidney for people with kidney failure] was accurate, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis (resident 2). Findings include:Resident 2's record was reviewed on 3/16/26 at 11:17 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease (the final stage of kidney failure, where kidneys lose roughly 90% of their function, or are no longer able to work well enough to sustain life) and dependence on renal dialysis. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/22/26, indicated the resident had no cognitive deficit. A care plan, dated 2/11/25, indicated the resident had diagnoses of end stage renal disease and required hemodialysis. Interventions included, but were not limited to, monitor shunt for bruit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure insulins stored in the medication carts were labeled with the open date for 1 of 2 medication carts reviewed and 3 of 3 residents with insulins stored in the medication cart (Residents 37, 12, and 34). Findings include:On 3/17/26 at 1:25 p.m., observed the North hall medication cart with RN 6. The following insulin pens (a portable, easy-to-use medical device for injecting insulin to manage diabetes) were observed: Resident 37, Novolog - Insulin Pen. The medication label indicated the prescription had been filled on 2/13/26. No date opened was recorded on the label or the pen. Resident 37, Basaglar insulin pen. The medication label indicated the prescription had been filled on 7/2/25. No date opened was recorded on the label or the pen. Resident 37, Novolog insulin pen. The medication label indicated the prescription had been filled on 12/10/25. No date opened was recorded on the label or the pen. Resident 12, Glargine insulin pen. The medication label indicated the prescription had been filled on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure lab services were completed as ordered, for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 30 and 3). Findings include: 1. Resident 30's record was reviewed on 3/16/26 at 10:28 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, other seizures (seizure types beyond common convulsions, characterized by temporary, abnormal brain activity causing sudden changes in movement, sensation, behavior, or awareness). A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/10/26, indicated the resident had no cognitive deficit and received anticonvulsant medications (medications used to control seizures). A physician's order, dated 11/21/25, indicated to administer 1-500 milligram (mg) tablet of Keppra (anticonvulsant medication) two times a day. A Pharmacy recommendation, dated 2/3/26, indicated to consider checking the resident's Keppra level, if it had not been done lately. The physician agreed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-30 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient dietary support personnel was implemented per their facility assessment. This deficiency had the potential to affect 44 of 44 residents who receive food from the kitchen.Findings include:Review of a confidential statement, on 1/29/26 at 9:47 a.m., indicated the food was disgusting from the kitchen and the kitchen didn't have enough workers. During an observation during lunch meal service, on 1/29/26 at 12:07 p.m., there were two dietary staff members in the kitchen. There were a Dietary Manager (cook) and a Dietary Aide. The Dietary Manager was the only staff member plating the food for both the dining room and hall trays. The Dietary Manager was unable to provide an additional food item per a resident's request because she stated, I don't have time right now, I have to get all the hall trays ready to go. During an interview, on 1/29/26 at 12:25 p.m., Resident C indicated the food had really gone down hill lately and she refused to eat most of it. She indicated the facility served the same…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure staff provided safe and accurate administration of medication for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services (Residents D, E, F, and G). Findings include:1. During a random observation on 9/18/25 at 3:32 p.m., LPN 4 was observed seated at the 100 hall nurses' station. The desk had multiple cards of medications and plastic medication cups, with initials marked on the outer surface. LPN 4 was dispensing pills from the medication cards into her bare hands and placing the pills in the medication cups. She dropped a pill onto the desk surface, picked it up with her bare hands, and placed it into the medication cup. During the observation, LPN 4 indicated she was setting up her medications for administration later in her shift. There were nine filled medication cups, stacked one on top of the other, on the desk. She indicated these were for the east hall. The cups were labeled with initials in marker. The following was observed, with the Director of Nursing (DON), Nurse Consultant, and LPN 4…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to assure nursing staff were using proper hygiene and infection control when preparing to administer medications for 1 of 2 observations for medication pass. Findings include:During a random observation on 9/18/25 at 3:32 p.m., LPN 4 was observed seated at the 100 hall nurses' station. The desk had multiple cards of medications and plastic medication cups, with initials marked on the outer surface. LPN 4 was dispensing pills from the medication cards into her bare hands and placing the pills in the medication cups. She dropped a pill onto the desk surface, picked it up with her bare hands, and placed it into the medication cup. She indicated she had not realized it was an issue after washing her hands. During an interview on 9/19/25 at 3:48 p.m. the Nurse Consultant indicated at no time should medications be handled with bare hands. A current facility policy, revised 4/2017, titled, Medication Administration, provided by the DON on 9/18/25 at 3:35 p.m., included the following: Purpose: To safely administer medications as per…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided showers/bed baths as preferred for 2 of 3 reviewed for choices (Residents 41 and 40). Findings include: 1. During an interview, on 3/17/25 at 9:29 a.m., Resident 41 indicated he had requested to receive two complete bed baths twice a week, but it was a challenge to receive the bed baths because of the facility not having enough staff. He indicated the bed baths were scheduled to occur on Monday and Thursday evening, but they were not getting done twice a week as requested. Resident 41 would sometimes only receive a washcloth from staff to wash his face and armpits and that was all he would get washed because he was unable to complete the task himself. Resident 41's record was reviewed on 3/18/25 at 10:50 a.m. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/3/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and required 1 to 2 staff assistance with activities of daily living (basic tasks that individuals perform to maintain their health and well-being). Review of daily preference…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN