Indiana Veterans Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 212 beds and averages 103.6 residents a day — about 49% occupied, or roughly 108 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.20 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.87 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.95 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.29 to 0.98 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was kept safe during a transfer for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident B) This deficient practice resulted in Resident B sustaining a 3 cm laceration to his posterior scalp. The deficient practice was corrected on 6/13/25, prior to the start of the survey and was therefore past noncompliance. Findings include: A facility reported incident (FRI), dated 6/8/25, indicated Resident B had a change of plane from a Hoyer lift. Resident B received a 3 cm laceration to the posterior scalp, was sent to the emergency room (ER) for evaluation and returned with 3 staples to his posterior head. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 6/18/25 at 1:10 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, obsessive compulsive disorder, anemia, restlessness and agitation, and abnormal posture. A hospital report, dated 6/8/25, indicated the resident was seen for a scalp laceration and a closed head injury from a fall at a nursing home at 1:07 p.m. The wound was closed with 3 staples,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident in a wheelchair was assisted to get off the facility vehicle safely for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident O) Resident O sustained a subdural hematoma and was hospitalized for 2 days. The deficient practice was corrected on 8/27/23, prior to the start of the survey and was therefore past noncompliance. Findings include: A Facility Reported Incident (FRI), dated 8/25/23 at 8:33 a.m., indicated Facility Driver 7 reported an accident while he was transporting Resident O. The driver was getting Resident O off the van at the hospital when he lost control of the resident's wheelchair while moving it toward the back of the van. The lift was down, and the resident fell backwards off the van and hit his head. Driver 7 fell on top of the resident. The facility had maintenance assess the van and lift, reviewed their transportation policies, and provided education and skills checks to staff. The follow up included the resident had a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident B and 73)Findings include:1. A facility witness statement, dated 9/22/25, indicated LPN 4 told CNA 6 she needed to give Resident B a suppository and advised CNA 6 when she provided resident care, LPN 4 would give it to him. When CNA 6 provided care, LPN 4 came into the room. As the resident was facing the wall, LPN 4 put on her gloves, gave the suppository, and the resident immediately yelled out. Resident B said the nurse was supposed to ask him before she gave him the suppository and Resident B did not want the suppository. LPN 4 told the resident he had not had a bowel movement in days and he needed it. Resident B again told the nurse he did not want it. LPN 4 told him he could push it out, like if he had a bowel movement, and left the room. A facility incident report, dated 9/23/25, indicated LPN 4 administered Resident B a suppository and did not inform or get permission from the resident first. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order to hold a medication was followed according to the parameters for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 60 and 87)Findings Include:1. The clinical record for Resident 60 was reviewed on 12/4/25 at 2:08 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, combined systolic and diastolic heart failure, fistula of the intestine, and cellulitis of the left toe.A care plan, dated 9/11/25, indicated the resident had a diagnosis of congestive heart failure, nonrheumatic mitral valve insufficiency, nonrheumatic tricuspid valve insufficiency and A-Fib. Interventions included, but were not limited to, administer medications as ordered.A physician's order, dated 9/4/25, indicated administer metoprolol extended release (a blood pressure medication) 25 milligrams (mg) once a day with instructions to hold for a heart rate less than 60 or a systolic blood pressure less than 105.A medication administration record (MAR), dated 10/1/25 through 10/31/25, indicated metoprolol was administered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a diagnosis of dementia was free from a physical restraint used to inhibit freedom of movement for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for restraints. (Resident B) The deficient practice was corrected on 3/31/25, prior to the start of the survey, and therefore was past noncompliance. Findings include: A facility reported incident (FRI) indicated, on 3/29/25 at 9:25 a.m., Resident B was found to have the foot of his bed elevated to prevent him from getting out of his bed during the night. Resident B was on a locked memory care unit. It was discovered Resident B's bed was elevated and a pillow was placed under his mattress. The night shift indicated the resident was restless and had attempted to get out of his bed multiple times during the shift. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 4/11/25 at 10:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, dementia, major depressive disorder, and unsteadiness on feet. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when blood sugar readings were in the call parameter range and to hold medications per the physician ordered parameters for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 93, 35 and 108) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 93 was reviewed on 12/4/24 at 9:43 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus, atrophy of the kidney, and hypothyroidism. A current care plan, with a start date of 8/1/24, indicated the resident was at risk of complications related to diabetes and to notify the physician or Nurse Practitioner (NP) as needed. A physician's order, with a start date of 10/2/24, indicated to check blood sugars in the morning and at night and to call the physician if the blood sugar was below 60 or above 350. The electronic medical record indicated, on 10/7/24, the morning blood sugar was 57. A progress note, dated 10/7/24 at 6:08 a.m., indicated the blood sugar this morning was 57. The resident was given chocolate milk and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff did not leave a resident unsupervised in a multi-sensory room for longer than 30 minutes per the facility policy, to ensure the resident had a call light or a way to summon staff while in the multi-sensory room, and failed to ensure staff did not leave the resident lying on a fall mat on the floor for an extended period of time for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for supervision. (Resident J) Finding includes: The clinical record for Resident J was reviewed on 12/5/24 at 11:32 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, violent behavior, primary insomnia, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, malignant neoplasm of prostate, frequency of micturition, history of falling, pain, and dementia with psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, and agitation. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/21/24, indicated the resident required moderate assistance to move from lying to sitting on the side of his bed, to come to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the correct amount of oxygen was administered to 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 64) Finding includes: During an observation, on 12/2/24 at 12:35 p.m., Resident 64 was sitting at a table in the common area in his reclining wheelchair. He was wearing oxygen administered via a portable oxygen tank hanging on the back of his wheelchair at a rate of 3 liters per minute (L). During an observation, on 12/3/24 at 4:19 p.m., the resident was sitting in his wheelchair with the portable oxygen tank turned off and hanging on the back of his wheelchair. There was no oxygen tubing present. The resident was not receiving any supplemental oxygen. During an observation, on 12/4/24 at 11:53 a.m., the resident was coloring with the staff in the common area with the portable oxygen tank on the back of his wheelchair delivering oxygen at 1.5 liters per minute. At 12:05 p.m., CNA 8 pushed Resident 64 in his wheelchair to another table for lunch with the portable tank hanging on the back of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to wear PPE (personal protective equipment) into an enhanced barrier precaution (EBP) room for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for transmission-based precautions. (Resident 39) Finding includes: During an observation, on 12/4/24 at 2:04 p.m., Register Nurse (RN) 13 entered Resident 39's room to administer medication. The resident had a gastrostomy tube (a tube surgically inserted into the stomach to provide medication and nutrition) and was in isolation for enhanced barrier precautions. RN 13 did not put on an isolation gown to give the medication via gastrostomy tube. The clinical record for Resident 39 was reviewed on 12/4/24 at 11:28 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Huntington's disease (a disorder which damages brain cells), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and abnormal weight loss. A physician's order, dated 12/1/24, indicated the resident was in Enhanced Barrier Precautions. During an interview, on 12/4/24 at 2:39 p.m., RN 13 indicated the resident was not in isolation. The nurse then read…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a moderately impaired resident was free from restraints for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B) Finding includes: An incident report sent to the Indiana Department of Health indicated, on 1/26/24, Resident B was found during morning rounds to have the foot of his recliner elevated with a dining room chair to prevent him from lowering the legs of his recliner during the night. It was reported CNA 9 had elevated the resident's recliner legs during the night to prevent the resident from lowering his legs. Resident B was allowed out of his recliner after discovery and was monitored for any signs and symptoms of distress. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 2/12/24 at 12:15 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertensive heart disease, major depressive disorder, dementia, osteoporosis, and hyperlipidemia. The resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 10 which indicated the resident's cognition was moderately impaired. A nursing note, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a door to the bathroom in his room for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dignity. (Resident J) Finding includes: During an observation, on 10/19/23 at 2:54 p.m., Resident J did not have a door for the bathroom in his room. The sink and toilet were visible when entering the resident's room. The record for Resident J was reviewed on 10/23/23 at 2:08 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with mood disturbance, restlessness and agitation, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and history of a traumatic brain injury. During an interview, on 10/23/23 at 2:31 p.m., Social Services 9 indicated she did not know the reason the resident did not have a door to his bathroom. During an interview, on 10/23/23 at 2:52 p.m., CNA 8 indicated the resident was getting a sliding door for his bathroom. She thought the door might have been taken off since the resident would slam the door at times. During an observation and interview, on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a cognitively impaired resident who received hospice services was free from abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B) Finding includes: The record for Resident B was reviewed on 10/23/23 at 11:27 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, encounter for palliative care, pain of the left hip, dementia with anxiety, hearing loss, and cognitive communication deficit. A physician's order, dated 7/14/23, indicated to discontinue weights and labs due to hospice and end stage dementia. A care plan, dated 7/12/23, indicated the resident was receiving hospice services due to Alzheimer's disease. The goal was for the resident to be kept comfortable, to have her pain managed throughout the progression of the disease, and to have psychosocial support through the end-of-life care. A facility reported incident (FRI), dated 8/8/23, indicated an incident occurred at 7:34 a.m., when QMA 2 was observed to pull Resident B's face towards her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN