Restoracy Of Whitestown, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 176 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 68.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 122 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 68.3 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.13 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.75 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · E2026-02-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were afforded privacy during medical assessments and personal care for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for privacy (Residents 3, 8, 28, 65, and 25). Findings include:1. On 2/10/26 at 11:40 a.m., the Physician Assistant (PA) approached Resident 3 while she was asleep in a chair in a common area. Without ensuring the resident was awake, without requesting permission, and without providing privacy, the PA pulled the collar of the resident's shirt to the side to assess bruising on the resident's left shoulder. The assessment occurred in a common area where privacy was not provided. On 2/10/26 at 11:43 a.m., PA approached Resident 8 in the main activity room, where other residents were present, and asked the resident about her pain level. Resident 8 indicated, her pain was really bad. The PA then assessed the resident by checking her pulse and visually examining her physical condition while she remained in the main activity room, without offering or providing privacy. 2. On 2/11/26 at 10:57 a.m., the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with dementia (Resident 37) received person-centered care and services to honor Resident 37's expressed preference to leave the dining room table for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dementia care. Findings include: Throughout the survey period, Resident 37 was observed to be pleasantly confused, non-verbal, and independent in her activity pursuits which mostly consisted of independently ambulating in her wheelchair up and down the hallway outside of her room. She was also observed to prefer sitting away from the dining room table, and watching her peers, staff, and visitors instead of participating or engaging with them. During a continuous observation on 2/12/26, from 12:20 p.m., until 12:50 p.m., the following was observed: Resident 37 and ten of her peers were observed gathered in the dining room while they waited for lunch. Resident 37 was observed to exhibit behaviors consistent with attempting to leave the dining…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed appropriate hand hygiene and used infection control practices between resident contact and during resident assessments. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 3 of 3 residents randomly observed, (Residents 28, 3 and 65). Findings include: On 2/11/26 at 10:57 a.m., the Physician's Assistant (PA) was asked to assess Resident 28's leg for a suspected rash. The PA examined the resident's leg by pulling up the resident's pant leg and palpating the resident's skin without performing hand hygiene or wearing gloves.On 2/11/26 at 10:58 a.m., immediately after touching Resident 28, the PA approached Resident 3 and touched the resident's clothing and skin to assess bruising without performing hand hygiene between residents.On 2/11/26 at 10:59 a.m., immediately after contact with Resident 3, the PA approached Resident 65 and wiped the resident's nose and mouth with a tissue without performing hand hygiene between residents.On 2/11/26 at 11:03 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 7…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were available to answer and address the root cause needs/requests of residents without having to wait for long periods of time for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for call light response times (Residents 38, 18, 13 and 1). Findings include: 1. During a continuous observation on 10/30/23 from 4:00 p.m., until 4:55 p.m., the following was observed: At 4:00 p.m., Resident 38 was observed in bed. He indicated he wanted to get out of bed because he did not like to lay in bed for long periods of time. He was laid down after lunch around 1:30 p.m. and had put his call light on about ten till 4:00, the girl came and said she would be right back, but he was still waiting. His call light was observed off at that time, and with his permission it was placed on again. Resident 38 indicated he often waited a long time to get up, because he needed two people and the Hoyer lift, plus when they were finally able to come, he would need to be cleaned up before he could be gotten out of bed. At 4:13 p.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, (Resident 18) who required the use of a posture support harness/mobility device received routine and ongoing assessments and monitoring of the device to prevent the potential for accidents for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for positioning. Findings include: On 10/31/23 at 1:29 p.m., Resident 18 was observed. She was seated in an electric wheelchair with an adjustable harnessed strap buckled across her sternum. On 11/1/23 at 11:17 a.m., Resident 18's medical record was reviewed. She was aa long term care resident with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, multiple sclerosis, history of stroke and muscle spasms. An Occupation Therapy (OT) Discharge summary indicated Resident 18 had received treatment and services between 9/23/22 and 12/15/22. During that time, she received a new harness for her wheelchair. New harness equipment ordered and tilt chair modified by power mobility company with assistance from OT to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's enteral tube feeding formulas and water containers were labeled according to policy for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tube feeding (Resident 19). Findings include: On 10/30/23 at 10:03 a.m., Resident 19 was observed in bed, a tube feeding bag and water bag were observed hanging from an IV (intravenous) pole. Neither bag had labels and no hand writing was observed. The kangaroo pump indicated 40 milliliters (mL) per hour. On 10/30/23 at 2:26 p.m., Resident 19's tubing feeding formula and water bags had a information written on the bags in ink. It indicated 10/30/23, 12 a.m., with illegible initials. On 10/31/23 at 9:13 a.m., the enteral feeding formula bag was labeled as Jevity 1.5, 10/30, 2100. The water bag was not labeled. On 10/31/23 at 9:47 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) 8 indicated the enteral feeding formula and the water bag should always be labeled. On 11/1/23 at 9:27 a.m., Resident 19's record was reviewed. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, anxiety, severe…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not accidently given the wrong medication to prevent the potential for a significant medication error for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents, (Resident 8). Findings include: On 10/30/23 at 11:14 a.m., Resident 8 was observed in her home's activity room. She was working on a table puzzle and agreed to an interview at that time. Resident 8 indicated she had never had a concern or issue until last week when she was mistakenly given another resident's medication. There had been an agency nurse on the weekend who must not have known the residents very well. That morning she had come to give Resident 8 her morning medication and after she had swallowed the cup of pills, she noticed the incorrect room number written on the cup. Resident 8 had received Resident 18's medications. Resident 8 indicated she used to live in the room where Resident 18 was now, and perhaps that was how the mix-up occurred. She did not remember much of the rest of the day, she felt dizzy and very tired and thought…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to date medications and destroy expired medications for 3 residents in 2 of 5 resident houses (Residents 44, 54, and 22). Findings include: 1. During an observation on 10/31/23 at 10:06 a.m., Resident 44 had a bottle of lorazepam 2mg/ml in house 5's refrigerator. The bottle was opened with no date to identify when it was opened. The pharmacy sent the bottle on 8/28/23. 2. During an observation on 10/31/23 at 10:08 a.m., Resident 54 had a bottle of lorazepam 2mg/ml in house 5's refrigerator. The bottle was illegible. His name was written on the bottle. There was no date to indicate when it was opened. 3. During an observation on 10/31/23 at 10:10 a.m., Resident 22 had a bottle of lorazepam 2mg/ml in house 5's refrigerator. The bottle was opened with no date to indicate when it was opened. The pharmacy sent the bottle on 3/13/23. 4. During an observation on 10/31/23 at 10:15 a.m., a vial of tuberculin serum was lying in the refrigerator of house 6 with no date to indicate when it was opened. During an interview with the DON…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $24K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN