Catholic Care Center, INC
6700 E 45th Street North, Bel Aire, KS 67226 · Non profit - Corporation · 159 certified beds · (316) 744-2020 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $15,733 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-18)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.3% | 17.9% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.9% | 4.9% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 1.6% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 2.9% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.0% | 6.5% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.5% | 4.3% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.9% | 16.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 26.2% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.8% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.7% | 4.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.6% | 22.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.4% | 18.1% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.9% | 1.9% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.1% | 73.8% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.6% | 22.4% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.1% | 11.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.55 | 1.80 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.79 | 2.13 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
67.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 270 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 58.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 169 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 67.8%CMS range 61.2–72.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.2%CMS range 6.4–11.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 58.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 57.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 59.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 4.5–9.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.87 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 159 beds and averages 152.7 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.28 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.89 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.45 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2025-11-18 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 155 residents and 61 residents with full code status (decision to receive resuscitative measures). The sample included three residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR - an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when the heart stops beating) to Resident (R) 1, who had a documented desire for full resuscitative measures. On [DATE] at 04:30 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O observed R1 in his bed not breathing and CNA O immediately reported this to Licensed Nurse (LN) G. LN G assessed R1, then went to the nurse station to verify R1's code status in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and advised CNA O that R1's hospice providers would take care of the rest. At 04:42 AM LN G called R1's hospice provider to report the event. At 05:15 AM, R1's hospice providers arrived at the facility, assessed R1, and initiated CPR (approximately 45 minutes after staff found R1 unresponsive), per R1's physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify Resident (R) 1's responsible party of a medication error that may have affected R1's physical health and may have required medical intervention. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), asthma (a disorder of narrowed airways that causes wheezing and shortness of breath), chronic pain, and osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 03/31/26, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of nine, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R1 required moderate assistance from staff for toileting, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 remained free of significant medication errors when on 04/22/26, Licensed Nurse (LN) G prepared medications administered the wrong medications and five units of regular insulin (a vital hormone produced by the pancreas that regulates blood sugar levels by enabling cells to use glucose for energy) to R1. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), asthma (a disorder of narrowed airways that causes wheezing and shortness of breath), chronic pain, and osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 03/31/26, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of nine, which indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 147 residents with four residents in the sample for indwelling catheter care. Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 received appropriate catheter care when staff inserted the wrong-sized suprapubic catheter (a tube inserted through the abdomen into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag). This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for pain and catheter-related complications. Findings included: - R1's Physicians Orders dated 10/24/24 documented a diagnosis of neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (dysfunction of the urinary bladder caused by a lesion of the nervous system). R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS noted R1 was independent with activities of daily living (ADL). The MDS did not indicate R1 had an indwelling catheter. R1's Quarterly MDS dated 05/28/25 recorded a BIMS score of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 147 residents; four residents were sampled. Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) when providing indwelling suprapubic catheter care (a tube inserted through the abdomen into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag). Additionally, staff failed to disinfect the Hoyer lift (full-body mechanical lift) after use. This placed the residents at risk for infections. Findings included: - Observation on 06/16/25 12:35 PM Licensed Nurse (LN) G providing suprapubic catheter care for Resident (R)1. LN G donned gloves but no gown and proceeded with the catheter care. Observation on 06/16/25 at 11:20 AM revealed LN H assisted Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M with transferring R2 from her bed to the shower chair using the Hoyer lift. Upon leaving R2's room LN H took the Hoyer lift…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - R32's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of hypertension (HTN- an elevated blood pressure), and absence of the left and right leg above the knee. R32's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 09/14/24 documented R32 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 which indicated a moderately impaired cognition. R32 required partial assistance for rolling left and right, substantial to maximal assistance for sitting to lying, and was dependent on staff for transfers. R32 had not had any falls since the prior assessment. R32's Cognition Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 09/19/24 documented he had a BIMS score of 11 and had mild cognitive impairment. Staff would assist and anticipate the resident's needs. R32 needed assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), transfers, hygiene, dressing, and bathing. Staff would provide assistance every two hours and as needed. R32's Care Plan last revised on 11/05/24, directed staff that R32 was at risk for falls secondary to being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 147 residents. The facility identified 41 residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) and four residents on contact precautions (safeguards designed to reduce the risk of transmission of microorganisms by direct or indirect contact). Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)109's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP- ventilation device that blows a gentle stream of air into the nose to keep the airway open during sleep) mask and the nasal cannulas for R45, R27, and R57 were stored in a sanitary manner when not in use and further failed to implement adequate hand hygiene and ensure the shared blood pressure cuff was sanitized after resident use. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for infectious diseases. Findings included: - On 12/03/24 at 07:47 AM Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S obtained R93's blood pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0942 — patternEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 147 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure direct care staff had received the required resident rights. This placed the residents at risk for impaired care and decreased quality of life. Finding included: - On 12/04/24 a review of the provided training for agency Certified Nurses Aid (CNA) MM, CNA NN, and CNA OO revealed the following: CNA MM's facility-provided credentialling file lacked evidence training was completed for resident rights training. CNA NN's facility-provided credentialling file lacked evidence training was completed for resident rights training. CNA OO's facility-provided credentialling file lacked evidence training was completed for resident rights training. On 12/04/24 at 02:21 PM Administrative Nurse D stated she reviewed all the nursing staff information sent by the agency staffing company before a staff member worked. Administrative Nurse D stated upon the nursing staff reporting for the first shift she would go over dementia training, infection control, abuse, falls, and change in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents with two residents reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 75's right to be treated with respect, and dignity when her clothing protector was not removed after the meal was finished. The facility also failed to ensure a dignified dining experience for R13 when staff stood over him instead of sitting beside him. This deficient practice placed these residents at risk for negative psychosocial outcomes and decreased dignity. Findings included: - R75's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational ion (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents with one reviewed for notification of changes. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to notify Resident (R)13's guardian of changes related to the addition of psychotropic (alters mood or thoughts) medications. This deficient practice placed R13 at risk for uninformed care choices or inability to consent or decline treatment. Findings included: - The Diagnoses tab of R13's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication, and fragmentation of thought), epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), intellectual disabilities, anxiety (mental or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments and timing. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident (R) 16 was accurately coded as required by the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual. This placed R16 at risk for an inaccurate care plan and unmet care needs. Findings included: - R16 ' s Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of end-stage renal disease (ESRD-a terminal disease of the kidneys), and gastrostomy (the introduction of a nutrient solution through a surgically inserted tube into the stomach through the abdominal wall). R16 ' s Significant Change MDS dated 09/24/24 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight which indicated a moderately impaired cognition. R16 was on a physician-prescribed weight gain regimen. R16 ' s MDS section K0520 Nutritional Approaches lacked documentation of a feeding tube (administration of nutritionally balanced liquefied foods or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents with Resident (R) 93 reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided appropriate and safe assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) to R93 during a transfer which resulted in bruises to both R93's arms. This deficient practice placed R93 at risk of decreased ADL ability, pain, and psychosocial distress. Findings included: - R93's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of repeated falls, hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), blindness in one eye, and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). R93's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 06/28/24 documented she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 which indicated a moderately impaired cognition. R93 required substantial to maximal assistance of staff for bed-to-chair (or wheelchair) transfers. R93 had a history…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents with seven residents reviewed for treatment and services to prevent and/or heal pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 22's heels were offloaded either by boots or a pillow and further failed to ensure R13 was provided a pressure-reducing cushion for his wheelchair. This placed R22 and R13 at increased risk for pressure ulcer development and delayed healing. Findings Included: - R22's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of sepsis (a life-threatening systemic reaction that develops due to infections that cause inflammation throughout the entire body), Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA-a type of bacteria resistant to many antibiotics), diabetes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents with two residents reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 52's physician-ordered supplemental oxygen supply was turned on. The facility failed to ensure R109's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP- ventilation device that blows a gentle stream of air into the nose to keep the airway open during sleep) was stored appropriately when not in use. This placed R52 and R109 at risk of respiratory complications and possible infection. Findings included: - R52's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of respiratory failure (a condition where your blood does not have enough oxygen), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), aspiration pneumonia (an inflammatory condition of the lungs caused by inhaling foreign material or vomit), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents with three residents reviewed for hemodialysis (a procedure using a machine to remove excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to monitor Resident (R) 80's access site for complications at least daily and document the arteriovenous (AV-a surgically created connection between an artery and a vein used for hemodialysis) fistula for the thrill (palpable vibration) and bruit (an audible vascular sound associated with turbulent blood flow usually heard with a stethoscope that may occasionally also be palpated as a thrill) every day. This deficient practice placed R80 at risk of adverse outcomes and physical complications related to dialysis. Findings included: - R80's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of end-stage renal disease (ESRD-a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents with two residents reviewed for trauma-informed care (treatment or care directed to prevent re-experiencing or reducing the effects of traumatic events). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to identify trauma-based triggers related to Resident (R) 75's and R107 posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a mental disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress) and failed to implement individualized interventions to prevent re-traumatization. These deficient practices placed R75 and R107 at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being and ineffective treatment. Findings included: - R75's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational ion (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents with two reviewed for dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion) care. Based on interviews, record review, and observations, the facility failed to provide dementia-related behavioral services for Resident (R)30 to promote her highest practicable level of well-being. This deficient practice placed R30 at risk for decreased quality of life, isolation, and impaired dignity. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R30's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), history of seizures (violent involuntary series of contractions of a group of muscles), epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures), and insomnia (difficulty sleeping). R30's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 10/30/24 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS noted that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents with six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) recommendations were acknowledged and/or acted upon for Resident (R) 75. This deficient practice placed R75 at risk for unnecessary medication use and possible adverse side effects. Findings included: - R75's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational ion (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R75 received antianxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents with six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to follow instructions related to medication monitoring when staff administered Resident (R)303's anti-hypertensive (class of medication used to treat high blood pressure) medications outside the physician-ordered parameters. This deficient practice placed R303 at increased risk for unnecessary medication and side effects. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R303's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of acute respiratory failure, atherosclerotic heart disease (reduced blood flow due to blockages in the arteries within the heart), atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), hypertension (high blood pressure), and chronic kidney disease. R303's EMR revealed he was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 11/15/24 to an acute care facility for emergency treatment. R303 did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents with six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the as-needed (PRN) psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medication had a 14-day stop date or a specified duration with supporting physician documentation for Resident (R) 75's and R13's PRN psychotropic medications. This placed these residents at risk for unnecessary medication administration and possible adverse side effects. Findings included: - R75's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational ion (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents with Resident (R) 93 reviewed for hospice services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure collaboration of care between R93's hospice provider and the facility. This placed R93 at risk of inadequate end-of-life care. Findings included: - R93's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of repeated falls, hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), blindness in one eye, and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). R93's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 06/28/24 documented she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 which indicated a moderately impaired cognition. R93 required substantial to maximal assistance of staff for bed-to-chair (or wheelchair) transfers. R93 had a history of one fall without injury and one fall with injury since her prior assessment. R93 was on hospice services. R93's Quarterly MDS dated 06/28/24 documented she had a BIMS score of 13 which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 89 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to promote dignity during the dining experience for residents in two of three dining rooms when staff scraped off soiled plates next to residents who were still eating and nursing staff administered eye drops and nasal spray medications in the dining room in front of other residents. The facility further failed to ensure a dignity cover for R21's urinary drainage bag. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for impaired dignity and embarrassment. Findings included: - On 02/22/23 at 09:02 AM, while several residents were still eating, observation revealed Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R wheeled the garbage cart between dining tables, scraping off soiled plates within one foot of seated residents still dining. On 02/22/23 at 12:40 PM, observation revealed Dietary Staff (DS) CC cleaned off tables with residents still sitting there. Continued observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-27 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 89 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide three sampled residents, Resident (R)13, R38 and R189 (or their representative) the completed Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notices (ABN) form 10055, (CMS) Centers for Medicare and Medicare Services which placed them at risk to make uninformed decisions about their skilled care Findings included: - The Medicare ABN form 10055 informed the beneficiary that Medicare may not pay for future skilled therapy services. The form included an option for the beneficiary to receive specific services listed, and bill Medicare for an official decision on payment. The form stated 1) I understand if Medicare does not pay, I will be responsible for payment, but can make an appeal to Medicare, (2) receive therapy listed, but do not bill Medicare, I am responsible for payment for services, (3) I do not want the listed services. The facility failed to provide R13 the completed form 10055, which estimated the cost for the services to be able to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 89 residents. The sample included 18 residents with seven reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to review or revise the care plan to prevent further falls for Resident (R) 19 after three of her falls. This deficient practice placed R19 at risk for further falls and injury. Findings included: - R19's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of severe dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), unsteadiness on feet, muscle weakness, and chronic pain. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, and short- and long-term memory problems with severely impaired decision making. The MDS documented R19 required extensive assistance of one staff for eating, hygiene, extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, walking, locomotion, toileting, dressing and total assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 89 residents. The sample included 18 residents with six residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene, including bathing for one of the six reviewed for ADLs, Resident (R)33. This placed the resident at risk for poor personal hygiene and infection. Findings included: - R33's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), diabetes mellites (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and muscle weakness. R33's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R33 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 which indicated moderate cognition impairment. The MDS recorded R33 required extensive assistance of one staff for most activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 89 residents. The sample included 18 residents with seven reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify and implement meaningful, resident-centered interventions to prevent falls for Resident (R) 19 and failed to complete ongoing monitoring for fall related injuries after falls. This deficient practice placed R19 at risk for further falls or injury. Findings included: - R19's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of severe dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), unsteadiness on feet, muscle weakness, and chronic pain. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, and short- and long-term memory problems with severely impaired decision making. The MDS documented R19 required extensive assistance of one staff for eating, hygiene, extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 89 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one reviewed for pain. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent a medication error when pain medications were not administered as ordered by the physician for Resident (R) 19. This deficient practice place R19 at risk to potentially receive harmful amounts of her pain medication. Findings included: - R19's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of severe dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning) and chronic pain. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, and short- and long-term memory problems with severely impaired decision making. The MDS documented R19 required extensive assistance of one staff for eating, hygiene, extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, walking, locomotion, toileting, dressing and total assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 89 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the medication for Resident (R) 5 was labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards. This deficient practice placed R5 at risk for medication errors. Findings included: - On 02/22/23 at 08:51 AM, observation revealed Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S applied a Salon Pas (pain medication) patch, 3.1/6%, to each of R5's knees. The Physician Order, dated 04/02/21, directed staff to apply the Salon Pas patch to R5's mid and lower back for pain daily. On 02/22/23 at 01:06 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G verified the physician's order directed staff to administer R5's Salon Pas patches to his mid and lower back. On 02/22/23 at 01:14 PM, CMA S showed R5's Salon Pas medication box had a handwritten message to apply to both legs. The pharmacy label was still on the box with the instruction to apply to mid and lower back. On 02/22/23 at 01:15 PM, Administrative Nurse E verified the physician order directed staff to apply…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 89 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one reviewed for urinary catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) or urinary tract infection (UTI). Based on observation, record review and interview the facility staff failed to change gloves when providing Resident (R) 18 incontinent cares and continued to provide care with the same soiled gloves. This placed the resident at risk for infection. Findings included: - R18's Electronic Medical Record documented R18 had diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurological disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and muscle weakness. R18's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated 01/20/23, documented R18 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R18 required extensive staff assistance with transfers, locomotion off unit, bed mobility, toiler use and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-06-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 135 residents. The facility had one main kitchen with five satellite kitchens. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure sanitary use of gloves while preparing and serving food to residents in one of five satellite kitchens on the 200 Hall. Twenty-six residents resided on 200 Hall. Findings included: - Observation on 06/22/21 at 11:27 AM revealed Dietary Aide Q in the 200 Hall satellite kitchen served lunch, wore gloves, and used utensils to serve except when he unwrapped the baked potatoes and touched the potatoes with the same gloves he used to open cabinets, touch utensils, retrieve plates, papers, touch plates, and push up his glasses. Interview with Dietary Aide Q on 06/22/21 at 11:47 AM revealed he used utensils for handling food and indicated he wore gloves, so it was ok. Interview with Dietary Manager R on 06/22/21 at 02:42 PM verified Dietary Aide Q only worked on the 200 Hall and if staff used gloves, they should remove them if they have touched something other than the food, because we use utensils for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-28 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 135 residents with 27 residents included in the sample and two residents reviewed for hospitalizations. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 274 and his representative written notice of the reason for the transfer/discharge to the hospital. Findings included: - Review of the Physician's Orders in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) dated 06/11/21 revealed R274 had diagnoses of: cerebral infarction (damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area, also known as a stroke) and epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition with seizures noted. Review of the Quarterly MDS dated 04/07/21 revealed a BIMS of 11, indicating moderately impaired cognition with seizures noted. Review of the ADL Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 01/22/21 revealed R 274 was at another community for short…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-28 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 135 residents with 27 residents included in the sample and two residents reviewed for hospitalizations. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 274 and his representative with a bed-hold policy upon transfer to the hospital. Findings included: - Review of the Physician's Orders in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) dated 06/11/21 revealed R 274 had diagnoses of: cerebral infarction (damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area, also known as a stroke) and epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition with seizures noted. Review of the Quarterly MDS dated 04/07/21 revealed a BIMS of 11, indicating moderately impaired cognition with seizures noted. Review of the ADL Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 01/22/21 revealed R 274 was at another community for short term…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 135 residents with 27 residents in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to update Resident (R)98's care plan with care and maintenance of the Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP- machine that uses pressure to push air into the lungs, opening the lungs and improving the level of oxygen in the blood and decreasing the carbon dioxide) equipment and supplies. Findings included: - R98's pertinent diagnoses from the Physician's Orders Diagnosis in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) dated 05/05/21 revealed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). The 01/28/21 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition and use of a BIPAP. Review of the 01/28/21 Activities of Daily Living [ADLs] Care Area Assessment (CAA) revealed R98 was recently hospitalized for acute (quick onset) chronic (long-term) hypercapnia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 135 residents with 27 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of two residents reviewed for ADLs (Activities for Daily Living) received assistance from staff for grooming as evidenced by Resident (R) 103 was unshaven and had fingernails that needed to be trimmed. Findings included: - Review of the Physician Progress Note dated 06/02/21 for R103 revealed the following diagnosis: Dementia without behaviors (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). Review of the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score three which indicated severely impaired cognition. R103 required limited assistance with personal hygiene and dressing, and activity did not occur for bathing. Review of the Quarterly MDS dated 05/26/21 revealed a BIMS of three which indicated severely impaired cognition. R103 required extensive assistance with personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 135 residents with 27 residents in the sample with one resident reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R)98's Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP- machine that uses pressure to push air into the lungs, opening the lungs and improving the level of oxygen in the blood and decreasing the carbon dioxide) was maintained and stored in a sanitary manner. Findings included: - R98's pertinent diagnoses from the Physician's Orders Diagnosis in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) dated 05/05/21 revealed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). The 01/28/21 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition and use of a BIPAP. Review of the 01/28/21 Activities of Daily Living [ADLs] Care Area Assessment (CAA) revealed R98 was recently hospitalized for acute (quick onset)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 135 residents, with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete physician orders in response to the monthly Medication Regimen Reviews (MRR) from the consultant pharmacist for Resident (R) 60 for the addition of an end date for the resident's PRN psychotropic medication and correction to the antipsychotic medication diagnosis. Findings included: - Review of R60's pertinent diagnoses from the Physician's Orders in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) dated 05/03/21 documented Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) major mood disorder), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) and muscle spasms. Review of the 05/08/21 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of seven, indicating moderately impaired cognition with no behaviors. R60 received antipsychotic medications on a routine bases only with no as needed (PRN) doses received. R60's Psychotropic Drug Use Care Area…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 135 residents, with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to monitor Resident (R)60's effectiveness of Lasix (diuretic, medication used to promote the excretion of fluids) as ordered by the physician. Findings included: - Review of R60's pertinent diagnoses from the Physician's Orders in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) dated 05/03/21 documented hypertension (elevated blood pressure) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). Review of the 05/08/21 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of seven, indicating moderately impaired cognition. R60 weighed 193 pounds and received diuretics three of the seven day look back period. R60's Cognitive Loss/ Dementia Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 05/08/21 documented R60 scored seven on the BIMS, indicating severely impaired cognition. The 05/03/21 Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 135 residents, with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to initiate doctor's orders to limit the time frame of an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication and obtain an appropriate indication for use of an antipsychotic medication for Resident (R) 60. Findings included: - Review of R60's pertinent diagnoses from the Physician's Orders in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) dated 05/03/21 documented Major Depressive Disorder (MDD major mood disorder), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) and muscle spasms. Review of the 05/08/21 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of seven, indicating moderately impaired cognition with no behaviors. R60 received antipsychotic medications on a routine bases only with no PRN doses received. R60's Psychotropic Drug Use Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 05/08/21 documented R60 had the diagnosis of depression for which she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$15,733 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $15,733 — penalty dated 2025-11-18
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF WICHITA INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/01/2020 |
| BURRUS, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| CAMPBELL, BRIAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| ETHEREDGE, WESLEY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 04/09/2024 |
| HAMPEL, MELICIA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| HOFFMAN, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| LAFLEUR, CYNTHIA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2016 |
| LAZAR, JERALD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| MACIAS, JEAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| MEIER, CONNOR | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| OBLINGER, WARREN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| POOL, SUSAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| SCHUMER, MARY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2020 |
| STRECKER, KEVIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2020 |
| TRAN, DAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2022 |
| YORK, PATRICK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/02/2020 |
| BRETTON, ANGELICA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/04/2022 |
| DAVIS, BRENDA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 10/19/2020 |
| DEHASS, BRENDA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2015 |
| FUNK, JONATHAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/11/2024 |
| GUTHRIE, GEORGE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/29/2013 |
| HAJDUKOVICH, SUZANNE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| HIEBERT, DEVON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/23/2024 |
| MEIER-MCFERREN, SHAWN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/19/2019 |
| RAMIREZ, MONICA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/25/2025 |
| SANDERS, JENNIFER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/16/2008 |
| SHADDOX, ASHLEIGH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/21/2025 |
| FOREMAN, ASHLEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/08/2024 |
| SOLOMON, LEVETTE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/27/1998 |
| WILLIAMS, NECOL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/21/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 47 rows in the source record cover these 30 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175410. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.