Cheney Golden Age Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 37.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.15 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.37 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2024-11-18 · tag F0730 — widespread
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 36 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct annual performance reviews for five of the five sampled Certified Nurse Aides, employed with the facility over a year. Findings included: - During review of employment records for the five Certified Medication Aide (CMA)/Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) staff, employed by the facility for over a year, revealed the facility failed to complete annual performance review for the following direct care staff: 1. CNA/CMA C, hired 01/22/04 2. CNA D, hired 08/24/23 3. CNA E, hired 06/07/23 4. CNA F, hired 09/18/06 5. CNA G, hired 1/26/23 On 11/18/24 at 03:03 PM, Administrative Staff A confirmed the above findings and said she could not locate the most recent performance evaluations. Administrative Staff A stated that all staff should have a performance evaluation annually. Administrative Staff A confirmed that direct care staff worked with all residents throughout the facility. The facility did not provide a policy to address the completion of annual performance evaluations. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-11-18 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 36 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the Federal regulatory agency through Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) when the facility failed to accurately submit hourly staffing data for all nursing personnel. Findings included: - Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report for Fiscal Year (FY) for Quarter 3- 2024 (April 1 - June 30), the data indicated the facility failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 hours/Day on the following dates: 05/04/24 Saturday (SA), 05/12/24 Sunday (SU), 05/18/24 (SU), 06/02/24 (SA), 06/15/24 (SA), 06/16/24 (SU), 06/23/24 (SU) and 06/29/24 (SA). Review of the Nursing Schedule and Payroll Data Sheets for the above dates revealed the facility had adequate 24-hour nursing coverage. On 11/18/24 at 08:00 AM, Administrative Staff A reported payroll data and scheduling data reflected the facility had 24 hour nursing coverage. Administrative Staff A stated nursing staff were directed to not clock out for lunch if they did not leave the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for Resident (R)2 included a diagnosis of urinary retention (lack of ability to urinate and empty the bladder) and multiple sclerosis (progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord hypertension). The Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The assessment documented R2 required extensive assistance for all Activities of Daily Living (ADL) such as walking, grooming, toileting, dressing, and eating. The MDS did not identify R2 had an indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid). The Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documented R2 had a BIMS score of 12, which indicated intact cognition. The assessment documented R2 had an indwelling urinary catheter. The Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 05/25/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - The Electronic Health Record (EHR) for R2 included the diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory confusion), pain, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness),weakness, multiple sclerosis (progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord hypertension), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), urinary retention (lack of ability to urinate and empty the bladder), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented that R2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The assessment documented R2 required extensive assistance for all ADL (activities of daily living such as walking, grooming, toileting, dressing and eating) from staff and required mechanical full body lift. The Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documented R2 had a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-18 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide written notice for facility-initiated transfers for Residents (R) 11, R2, or R6 or their representative when they were transferred to the hospital. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) census log for R11 revealed a discharge from the facility to a hospital on [DATE] and noted the resident readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The census log also documented a discharge from the facility to a hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The EHR lacked documentation related to written notification of the resident or resident's representative related to this discharge/transfer. Review of the EHR census log for R6 revealed a discharge from the facility to a hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The EHR lacked documentation related to written notification…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 36 residents, which included 12 residents sampled. Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise care plans with appropriate interventions for two of the sampled residents; Resident (R) 6 related to development and implementation of appropriate interventions to prevent additional falls and R11 related to storage of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP - a device that provides continuous air pressure to keep the upper airway open during sleep) equipment when not in use. These deficient practices resulted in uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for Resident (R) 11 included the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA- a sleep related breathing disorder that cause people to stop and start breathing while asleep). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated moderately…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 36 residents, with 12 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify a fall, investigate causal factors, and implement fall prevention interventions for Resident (R)6 to prevent further falls. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for Resident (R)6 included the following diagnoses: lack of coordination, morbid (severe) obesity (excessive body fat), hemiplegia (muscular weakness of one half of the body), hemiparesis (paralysis of one side of the body), cerebrovascular disease (conditions that affect the blood vessels in the brain and spinal cord can), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), and lymphedema (swelling caused by accumulation of lymph). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented R6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The assessment documented R6 required substantial or maximum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-02-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sanitary food preparation, storage and serving to prevent the spread of food borne illness to the residents of the facility. Findings included: - Initial environmental tour of the kitchen, on 01/30/23 at 12:30 PM with Dietary Staff BB, revealed the following items/areas of concerns: 1. Five cutting boards identified, four cutting boards with deep cuts in the surface. One cutting board had flakes of the surface that came off during use. 2. A slotted dish cart next to the steam table was full of dishes all right-side-up, identified by Dietary Staff BB as clean and ready to use. The top dishes contained debris of unknown composition. Upon inspection and verification, dietary BB removed the dirty dishes. On 01/30/23 at 12:35 PM, a free-standing refrigerator inspection with Dietary Staff BB revealed the following concerns: 1. A large plastic bag of corned beef, unsealed. 2. A large…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-02-02 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 38 residents with 12 sampled, including three reviewed for Medicare Services. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the appropriate Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC- informs the beneficiaries of the right to an expedited review by a Quality Improvement Organization), form Center for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS)-10123, to all Medicare beneficiaries at least two days before the end of the Medicare covered Part A stay or when all of Part B therapies were ending for the three Residents (R)10, R139, and R140 reviewed. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)10's medical record, provided by the facility, revealed the resident's Medicare services were to end on 10/13/22. However, the facility failed to produce a signed NOMNC for R10. Review of R139's medical record, provided by the facility, revealed Medicare services were to end on 10/27/22. However, the facility failed to provide a signed NOMNC for R139. Review of R140's medical record, provided by the facility, revealed Medicare services were to end on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-02-02 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 38 residents, with 12 sampled. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an accurate comprehensive assessment for one of the resident's sampled that included Resident (R) 35 regarding wounds present on admission to the facility. Findings included: - Review of the admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R35 had zero venous and arterial ulcers (a condition in which wounds develop on the lower legs because of problems with blood circulation) present at admission to the facility. Review of 12/26/22 Pressure Ulcer/Injury Care Area Assessment (CAA), documented contributing physician diagnoses which included the resident's chronic leg venous stasis wounds. Review of the care plan dated 01/02/03 documented interventions for staff to perform wound care for chronic venous stasis wounds. The Physician's orders, dated 01/25/23, included instructions for the wound care for the resident's venous stasis ulcers. Review of Electronic Health Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS