No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Shepherd's Center

101 Cedar Ridge Drive, Cimarron, KS 67835 · Non profit - Corporation · 28 certified beds · (620) 855-3498 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0602, F0609, F0610) — most recent Jun 20243 immediate-jeopardy citations$13,627 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0602, F0609, F0610) — most recent Jun 2024
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (26) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $13,627 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-27)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
106 N Main St · (620) 855-4456 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
202 N Main St · (620) 855-2055 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
111 S Main St · (620) 855-4211 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(940) 659-8304 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-12 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased22.5%17.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.9%4.9%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.6%2.9%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.6%6.5%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.0%4.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.3%16.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication31.2%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine69.2%95.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.6%4.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.4%22.6%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.4%18.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.7%1.9%1.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.171.801.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.662.131.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.85U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.68hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.85 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.05
RN hours/ resident / day
0.24
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.82
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.11
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.74
RN hoursweekends
58.1%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 28 beds and averages 25.5 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.05 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.27 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.18 to 0.74 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-17)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · L2024-06-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — widespread
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 25 residents. The sample included six residents reviewed for misappropriation and exploitation. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the timely reporting of alleged exploitation to the State Agency (SA- a state governmental agency that provides oversight for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [CMS - the federal government agency that administers the nation's major healthcare programs]) or local law enforcement, as required, when the facility failed to report the allegation of exploitation of Resident (R) when Housekeeping Staff D coerced the resident to write her a check for $300.00. This deficient practice placed R1and other residents of the facility in immediate jeopardy with the risk for a negative psychosocial impact in safety and security. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses that included interstitial pulmonary disease (a disorder that causes progressive scarring of lung tissue), major…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · L2024-06-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — widespread
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 25 residents. The sample included six residents reviewed for misappropriation and exploitation. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate incidents of misappropriation of funds and failed to protect the residents from further misappropriation when Housekeeping Staff D coerced Resident (R)1 to write her a check for $300.00. This deficient practice placed R1and other residents of the facility in immediate jeopardy and placed the residents at risk for further misappropriation of funds. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses that included interstitial pulmonary disease (a disorder that causes progressive scarring of lung tissue), major depressive disorder (a major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness), and anxiety disorder (a mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-27 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 25 residents. The sample included six residents reviewed for misappropriation and exploitation. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)1 remained free from misappropriation of funds, when Housekeeping Staff D coerced the resident to write her a check for $300.00. This deficient practice placed R1and other residents of the facility in immediate jeopardy with the risk for a negative psychosocial impact in safety and security. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses that included interstitial pulmonary disease (a disorder that causes progressive scarring of lung tissue), major depressive disorder (a major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness), and anxiety disorder (a mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-11-17 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 20 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete the required annual evaluation for two of the five Certified Nursing Aide staff sampled. Findings included:-Review of the staff personnel files revealed the following:1.CNA N, hired on 08/02/23, had a performance evaluation dated 07/25/24 but nothing dated afterwards. 2. CNA O, hired 12/03/20, had a performance evaluation dated 05/06/24 but nothing dated afterwards.On 09/30/25 at 04:25 PM, Administrative Nurse D revealed she is planning on setting up the evaluations on a calendar and said they should be completed in a timely manner.The facility policy Staff Recruitment and Retention Policy, undated, revealed the facility recognizes staff members are the backbone of the organization. Their dedication, skills, and compassion directly impact the quality of care provided to our residents. The facility performs wage comparison and analysis on an annual basis to ensure the facility is offering competitive salaries and benefits to attract and retain qualified staff.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-11-17 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 20 resident. Based interviews. the facility failed to employ a full-time certified dietary manager for the residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the facility kitchen. Findings included: - Upon request, the facility was unable to provide evidence of adequate training credentials for the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM).On 09/29/25 at 10:35 AM, Dietary Manager BB stated she did not have a certificate or experience with food handling prior to taking the position. She revealed she was currently in classes for her CDM.On 10/1/25 at 03:35 PM, Administrative Staff A revealed she placed Dietary Manager BB in the position and was not aware she needed to have certification, specialized training, or experience. Administrative Staff A said Dietary Manager BB was currently in classes to obtain her CDM.The facility did not provide a policy regarding Certified Dietary Manager.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 20 resident with two satellite kitchens. Based on observation and interview the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary condition to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria. This place the residents at risk for food borne illnesses.Findings included:- On 09/29/25 at 09:40 AM, during the initial tour of the main pantry, observation revealed a dented can of refried beans, one bag of carrots with a lot of frost in the bag covering the carrots. And one sleeve of hash browns with no date.In the south satellite kitchen on the south hall, observation revealed one bag of hot dogs with a date of 07/27/25 with lots of frost, and one bag of carrots with frost covering the bag.In the north satellite kitchen, observation revealed one bag of hot dogs with no date, and one bag of carrots with a large amount of frost in the bag. The mini freezer did not have temperatures recorded from 09/23/25 to 09/29/25. A revisit of both satellite kitchens on 09/30/25 at 01:00 PM revealed the mini freezer temperatures log had not been updated. Neither of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-11-17 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 20 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observations, interview and record reviews, the facility failed to conduct a thorough facility wide assessment to determine the resources necessary to care for the residents competently during both day-day operations and emergencies. This failure affected all 20 residents residing in the facility.Findings included:- On 09/30/25, the Administrative Nurse D provided a Facility assessment dated [DATE]. A review of the assessment revealed the following. The assessment did not identify the specific staffing levels needed for each unit and the number of Registered Nurses (RN), Licensed Nurses (LPN), Certified Medication Aides (CMA), and Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) needed for each unit, patient acuity, and census. The assessment lacked staffing levels required for each shift to include evenings and weekends. The assessment further lacked information for the contingency staffing plans for events that did not require activation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 20 residents; the sample included 13 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program (PIP) based on identification, investigation, analysis, and prevention of adverse events in the facility within the past year. Findings included:- Upon request the facility was unable to provide evidence of a PIP completed within the last year.During an interview on 10/01/25 at 03:14 PM, Administrative Staff A stated that she expected Administrative Nurse D to complete all the PIPs for the facility. Administrative Staff A stated she believed the last time a PIP was completed was one and a half years ago.The facility's policy Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Policy, dated 05/16/25, documented the facility had developed, implemented, and maintained an effective, on-going, comprehensive, data driven QAPI program focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life by addressing the full range of care and services provided by the facility. The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 20 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a system of surveillance designed to identify possible communicable diseases or infections before they can spread to other persons in the facility. Additionally, the facility failed to complete a system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 20 residents.Findings included:- Upon request, the facility was unable to provide antibiotic and infection surveillance logs.During an interview on 09/30/25 at 04:04 PM, Administrative Nurse E (Infection Preventionist) stated she had no electronic or paper records to show the collection and analysis of data to track infection rates and identify trends. Administrative Nurse E reported she would read the Electronic Medical Record every day to see if there were any new orders for antibiotics. She reported that she completed a verbal report of the facilities infections, and antibiotic use at the Quality…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-11-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 20 residents; the sample included 13. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff adhered to the principles of antibiotic stewardship through monitoring for the appropriate use of antibiotics prescribed to prevent antibiotic resistance and spread of multidrug resistant organisms within the facility. Findings included:- Upon request, the facility was unable to provide antibiotic and infection surveillance logs.During an interview on 09/30/25 at 04:04 PM, Administrative Nurse E (Infection Preventionist) stated she had no electronic or paper records to show the collection and analysis of data to track/monitor antibiotics ordered, and laboratory reports received. Administrative Nurse E reported she would read the Electronic Medical Record every day to see if there were any new orders for antibiotics. She reported that she completed a verbal report of the facility's infections and antibiotic use at the Quality Assurance meetings.The facility's policy Antibiotic Stewardship Program, dated 04/01/25, documented the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-17 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 20 residents; the sample included 13 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in a timely manner for six residents; Resident (R)1, R2, R5, R14, R18, and R20. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded the Annual MDS, dated [DATE], which was completed on 03/18/25 and submitted on 04/01/25. (46 days later)R2's EMR recorded a comprehensive MDS dated [DATE]. R2's EMR recorded the Significant Change MDS was completed on 08/07/25 and submitted on 08/21/25. (13 days later).R5's EMR recorded a comprehensive MDS dated [DATE]. R5's EMR recorded the Significant Change MDS was completed on 07/29/25 and submitted on 08/21/25. (26 days later).R14's EMR recorded a comprehensive MDS dated [DATE]. R14's EMR recorded the Annual MDS was completed on 09/03/25 and submitted on 09/26/25. (9 days later).R18's EMR recorded a comprehensive MDS dated [DATE]. R18's EMR recorded the Annual MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 20 residents. The sample included 13 residents with one resident reviewed for discharge. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 28 a written notification of discharge to the resident and/or his representative as soon as practicable and failed to complete a recapitulation of R28's stay. Findings included:- R28's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of frequent falls, and cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain).R28's 08/04/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS recorded R28 required maximal assistance with bathing, and dressing. The MDS recorded R28 was independent with ambulation. The MDS recorded R28's goal was to discharge back into the community, and she had an active discharge plan.R28's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 20 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one resident. Resident (R) 10, related to psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medications. Findings included:- R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and insomnia (inability to sleep).R10's 04/09/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13, which indicated intact cognition.The MDS recorded R10 was administered antianxiety (a class of medications that calm and relax people), antidepressant (a class of medications used to treat mood disorders), and diuretic (a medication to promote the formation and excretion of urine) in the lookback period of seven days. The MDS lacked the documentation of antipsychotic (a class of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 13 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 20 residents; the sample included 13 residents. Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to develop a Baseline Care Plan for Resident (R) 14.Findings included:- R14's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of myocardial infarction (heart attack) and major depression (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness).R14's admission Minimum Data Set documented the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE].R14's EMR record lacked a Baseline Care Plan.On 09/30/25 at 05:20 PM, an interview with Administrative Staff D revealed she expected each resident to have a baseline care plan assessment completed upon admission. The facility policy for Baseline Care Plan, Neighbors Caring For Neighbors, undated, states the facility will develop an initial person-centered care plan within the first forty-eight hours of admission for every resident. The baseline plan will provide instruction for care of the resident. Completion and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 20 residents; the sample included 13 residents. Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care for Resident (R)14. Findings included:- R14's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of myocardial infarction (heart attack) and major depression (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness). R14's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS noted R14 had behaviors, including rejection of care during the look-back period; R14 was independent with all activities of daily living (ADL). R14's EMR lacked a comprehensive care plan. On 09/30/25 at 05:20 PM, Administrative Staff D said she expected the resident care plans to be completed in a timely manner. The facility's policy Person-Centered, Comprehensive Care Plan, revised 03/31/25, documented it is the policy of this facility to provide an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 20 residents, The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to revise the care plan for Resident (R) 6 regarding pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) . Findings included:- R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the care plan dated 08/17/23 lacked wound care interventions. The care plan did indicate R6 at risk for cardiac complications and congestive heart failure dated 01/29/2024 with the following interventions check lung sounds and monitor/document labored breathing, monitor labs and vital signs as ordered. Monitor/document report any signs or symptoms of dependent edema of legs and feet, shortness of breath upon exertion, weight gain crackles and wheezes upon auscultation of lungs.R6's Physician's Orders documented to cleanse both buttocks per facility protocol; Pat dry, apply a dressing and change every 72 hours and as needed every day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 22 residents with two separate units and two resident kitchens. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store foods safely and sanitary manner to prevent food borne illnesses, for the 22 residents of the facility, in two of two resident kitchens. Findings included: - On 02/05/24 at 10:30 AM, an initial tour of the kitchen with dietary staff BB, revealed the following items of concern in the refrigerator: Two cartons of mighty shake (protein supplement drink) documented a thaw date of 12/23/23 and a warning on the label for the staff to use it within 14 days of the thaw date (01/06/24). A plastic bowl of grated cheese and a package of flour tortillas, both without an open date or a use by date. Dietary Staff BB verified the expired and undated items above. A continued initial tour, on 02/05/24 of the kitchen in house two, with Dietary Staff CC, revealed the following concerns in the refrigerator: A carton of a thawed mighty shake, with a thaw date of 12/23/23 and a warning label to staff to use it within 14 days of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-08 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information to the federal regulatory agency through Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ) when the facility failed to submit staffing hourly data for all nursing personnel by the required deadline. Findings included: - Review of the Fiscal Year (FY), Quarter 1- 2023 (October 1 -December 31), the facility failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 Hours/Day for the following: On 10/01/23; Saturday (SA), 11/06/23, Sunday (SU); 11/19/23 (SA); 12/03/23, (SA); 12/10/23 (SA); and 12/11/23, (SU). Review of the FY Quarter 2-2023 (January 1- March 31), the facility failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 Hours/Day for the following: On 01/07, (SA); 01/08, (SU); 01/21, (SA); 02/18, (SA); 02/19, (SU); 03/11, (SA); 03/12, (SU); 03/19, (SU); 03/25, (SA); and 03/26 (SU). Review of FY Quarter 3- 2023 (April 1 -June 30), the facility failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 Hours/Day for the following: On 04/08 (SA); 04/09 (SU); 04/22 (SA); 04/23 (SU);…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 22 residents the sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance Program failed to provide good faith efforts to identify multiple issue of concern for 22 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: - The facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for all new admission with in 48 hours for the following Resident (R12), R22, R23 and R127 with direction to staff on providing cares. Refer to F655. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident R15. Refer to F656. The facility failed to provide activities for confused wandering residents. Refer to F679. The facility failed to provide accurate physicians orders regarding respiratory care for R23. Refer to F695. The facility failed to obtain physician's orders to hold insulin, documentation notification of the physician when holding the insulin of R22. Refer to 757. The facility failed to remove outdated food items that could possible be served to the 22 Residents. Refer to F812. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Based on interviews the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment by the failure to use appropriate disinfectant to sanitize the washing machines after washing clothes/linens during an outbreak of COVID-19 (highly contagious respiratory virus). Findings included: - On 02/07/24 at 08:17 AM, Laundry Aide U reported staff utilized the small washing machine for biohazard material. Staff use vinegar to run through the washing machine after staff finish the biohazard linens/laundry. Laundry Aide U verified bleach or no other disinfectant utilized for sanitization inside the washer. On 02/07/23 at 01:28 PM, Laundry staff V revealed staff no longer use bleach to disinfect. Staff use vinegar to disinfect. Laundry staff V verified there was no information in the facility to indicate vinegar was to be used as a disinfectant. The facility's undated policy for Laundry Protocols revealed the facility to prevent the spread of infection by appropriate separation, collection, laundry, and storage of laundry. At the end of each laundry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 22 with 12 residents in the sample. Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to complete a base line care plans on four of the new admits into the facility Resident (R) 12, R22, R23, and R127. Finding included: - The Physicians Orders revealed the following diagnoses for R 12 included primary hypertension (elevated blood pressure) and chronic bronchitis (inflammation of the bronchial tubes). The admission Minimum Data Set dated 01/11/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) a score of 15 indicating intact cognition. R12 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The record review indicated the base line care plan had not been completed with in 48 hours of admission. Interview on 02/06/24 at 10:10 AM with Administrative Nurse E verified the resident had no baseline care plan. She had been working on the admissions (MDS) today (02/06/24). Administrative Nurse E reported she does not complete a care plan when a new resident admitted until she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 22 residents with 12 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide scheduled activities to prevent boredom and impaired psychosocial well-being for the residents that were confused and wandered in the facility. Findings included: - Resident (R) 127's signed physician orders dated 01/29/24 revealed the following diagnoses: Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). The Entry tracking record Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R127 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission MDS dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 11, indicating moderately impaired cognition. R127 had other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others daily and wandered daily. It was very important for R127 to listen to music, be around…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 22 residents with 12 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident (R) 18 related to interventions on the care plan related to a fracture of the Left elbow and Left wrist. Findings included: - Resident (R)18's signed physician orders dated 01/19/24 included the diagnoses of fracture of the left wrist (broken bone), fracture of the left elbow (broken bone in elbow), peripheral vascular disease (PVD - abnormal condition affecting the blood vessels), anorexia (lack or loss of appetite), and polyosteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident was independent with her daily care. The resident received pain medication on schedule and as needed for frequent complaints of pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 22 with 12 residents included in the sample that included one resident sampled for respiratory services. Based on observation. Interviews, and record review, the facility failed to obtain written orders regarding the rate of oxygen flow for one Resident (R)23, to receive per nasal cannula (a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen),and lack dates the oxygen tubing had been changed). In addition, the facility failed to label/date R23's oxygen tubing, to prevent adverse reactions from oxygen tubing. Findings Included: - The Physician Orders revealed Resident (R)23 had the following diagnosis that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) revealed a score of 14, indicating intact cognition. R23 has shortness of breath or trouble breathing with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 22 with 12 residents included in the sample, that included five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician ordered parameters for insulin (hormone that the level of glucose in the blood) and lacked notification to the physician for one Resident (R) 22 when staff held the physician ordered insulin. Findings included: - The Physician's order revealed a diagnosis of type two diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, indicating R22 had intact cognition. During the look back period, R22 received two days of injection with two days of receiving insulin. The Medication Administration Record revealed Tresiba (injectable insulin), 30 units, subcutaneously (beneath the skin) in the morning, related to type…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility census totaled 22 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an in-service training program for nurses' aides that was appropriate and effective to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides. The facility identified five Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA's) had been employed over one year. One of the five CNAs lacked the required 12 hours of in-service training, and one other CNA lacked completed training in abuse, neglect, and exploitation (ANE) to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides and appropriate care and services to all the residents of the facility. Findings included: - Review of a list of Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) employment dates revealed only five CNAs had been employed for at least 12 months. Of the five employees, one lacked completed training in abuse, neglect, and exploitation (ANE) and one lacked the 12 hours required inservice. On 12/13/23 the training log for CNA R had a total of 8.25 hours total for the year. On 12/14/23 at 12:30 PM, CNA S had a total of 15.5 hours with no ANE training. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$13,627 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-06-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CALHOUN, DEBORAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/16/2016
COAST, JAMESIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 02/16/2024
SCHARTZ, STEVENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 02/16/2024
VOGEL, GERALDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 02/16/2024
RINCON, TABITHAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/24/2025
SCHOWENGERDT, ANDREWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175570. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next