No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Pioneer Lodge

300 W 3rd, Coldwater, KS 67029 · Non profit - Corporation · 25 certified beds · (620) 582-2123 Medicaid only — no Medicare

Call the home — (620) 582-2123 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (23) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
106 N Main St · (620) 862-5431 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
113 E Main St · (620) 582-2134 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
307 S Central Ave · (620) 582-2401 · Call to confirm hours
Park
302 W 1st St · (620) 582-2702 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
302 S Central Ave · (620) 582-2463

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.6%17.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.5%4.9%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.2%2.9%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.4%6.5%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.2%4.3%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.2%16.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.9%23.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.4%4.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.9%22.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table32.4%18.1%17.1%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.371.801.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.712.131.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

<0.01U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
<0.01hours / resident / day
Physical therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show <0.01 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 0% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.83
RN hours/ resident / day
0.56
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.65
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.04
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.56
RN hoursweekends
58.3%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 25 beds and averages 23.3 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.04 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.65 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.27 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-23)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-14)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-23 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 23 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for at least eight continuous hours daily. Finding includes:- The facility's Daily Census Report, dated 09/21/25, documented 23 residents resided in the facility.Review of nursing schedules for 04/01/24 through 12/31/24 revealed a lack of RN coverage for eight continuous hours on 04/28/24, 05/11/24, 05/25/24, 06/01/24, 06/22/24, 06/23/24, 07/06/24, 07/07/24, 07/20/24, 07/21/24, 08/03/24, 08/04/24, 08/17/24, 08/18/24, 08/31/24, 09/01/24, 09/14/24, 09/15/24, 10/26/24, 10/27/24, 11/23/24, 11/24/24, and 12/21/24.Review of RN payroll documents for 04/01/24 through 12/31/24 revealed a lack of RN coverage for eight continuous hours on 04/28/24, 05/11/24, 05/25/24, 06/01/24, 06/22/24, 06/23/24, 07/06/24, 07/07/24, 07/20/24, 07/21/24, 08/03/24, 08/04/24, 08/17/24, 08/18/24, 08/31/24, 09/01/24, 09/14/24, 09/15/24, 10/26/24, 10/27/24, 11/23/24, 11/24/24, and 12/21/24.On 09/21/25 at 10:30 AM, observation revealed 23 residents resided in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 23 residents, and one main kitchen. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria. This placed the residents at risk for food borne illnesses.Findings included:- Observation of the kitchen and food storage areas on 09/21/25 at 09:20 AM revealed the following areas of concern:Dry Storage Area:Several storage bins filled with a variety of pasta with no date or label.Free-standing freezer:One bag of French toast sticks with no date or label.Several bags of English muffins with no date.One bag of garlic bread with no date or label.One bag of chicken patties, no date or label.One bag of chicken legs with no date or label.Several bags of ground beef and pork sausage, no date.One bag of pepperoni, no date.One bag of unidentified meat, no date or label.Free-Standing refrigerator:Three opened gallons of milk, no date.One opened bottle of tartar sauce, no date.One opened container of Parmesan cheese, no date.Three-bay Refrigerator:Old…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-23 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 23 residents. Five Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) staff who worked in the facility for more than 12 months were reviewed for the required in-service training. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and permanently maintain an in-service training program for CNA staff with the required topics and no less than 12 hours per year. Findings included:- Review of CNA personnel files revealed the following:CNA M, who was hired for the facility on 02/26/1997, lacked the total hours calculated for the 12 hours required.CNA N, who was hired 10/24/23, lacked the total hours calculated for the 12 hours required.CNA O, who was hired 08/29/17, lacked Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation (ANE) and social media training. CNA O's total hours were not calculated for the 12 hours required.During an interview on 09/23/25 at 09:00 AM, Administrative Staff A reported he expected the staff to have the required education and the required 12 hours annually.The facility did not provide a policy for CNA staff required for in-service and annual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-23 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 23 residents; the sample included 14 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform Resident (R) 18, R6, R9, R5 and R15 and/or their representative regarding the risks related to psychotropic (alters mood or thoughts) medications. Findings included:- Review of both Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and paper records revealed the following:R18's July 2025 Medication Administration record (MAR) documented an order for escitalopram oxalate (antidepressant medication used to treat mood disorders) five milligrams (mg) daily, dated 07/29/25 (discontinued on 09/08/25). R18's clinical record lacked evidence of informed consent related to the medication.R6's September 2025 MAR documented orders for divalproex sodium (anticonvulsant used for psychotropic properties to address mood and behavior) 125 mg at bedtime for major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness) dated 02/20/25 and Seroquel (antipsychotic medication) 300 mg at bedtime for psychotic disorder (major mental disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 23 residents. Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that meals were served at safe and appetizing temperature. This was evident of a one of one meal observation.Findings included:- During an observation on 09/22/25 at 10:42 AM, Dietary Staff DD prepared three servings of pureed sausage, onions, and peppers that had a cooked temperature of 165 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Dietary Staff DD pureed the food, and the temperature after preparation was 127 degrees F. Dietary Staff DD placed the pureed sausage in three separate, divided dishes and covered the dishes with foil. Dietary Staff DD prepared the pureed potatoes that had a cooked temperature of 186 degrees F. Dietary Staff checked the potatoes' temperature after they were pureed at 135 degrees F. Dietary Staff DD uncovered the three divided dishes and placed the pureed potatoes into the dish, and covered the dishes with foil that remained on the counter in the kitchen until 11:00 AM, when Dietary Staff DD placed the three divided dishes of prepared pureed food in the steam…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 23 residents; the sample included 14 with two residents reviewed for positioning and mobility. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a footboard or footrests for Resident (R) 3 and R9. Findings included:- R3's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and pain.R3's 04/14/25 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of zero, which indicated severely impaired cognition. R3's MDS recorded impairment to one side of R3's lower extremity. The MDS recorded R3 required total dependence of all activities of daily living. The 04/17/25 Cognitive Loss/Dementia Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R3 did not answer any questions. R3 was sometimes able to communicate nonverbally.R3's Care Plan instructed staff to provide a high-back wheelchair with anti-tip bars and to propel the wheelchair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 23 residents; 14 residents were sampled for advanced directives (a written document, which indicates the medical decisions for health care professionals when the person could not make their own decisions). Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two resident's advanced directives were accurately reflected when Resident (R) 2 had a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR- or no code, a legal document or order that means the person does not desire resuscitative measures) form completed but had an order for a full code. Additionally, R3's DNR lacked a resident/responsible party and witness signature. R14 declined a DNR in 2016, and the facility had a DNR order.Findings included:- Review of R2's Physician Order in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded an order for Full Code dated [DATE]. R2's Care Plan staff instructed to provide CPR dated [DATE]. Review of R2's EMR revealed a DNR signed by R2 on [DATE] and by a physician on [DATE].R3's Physician Order in the EMR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 23 residents. The sample included 14 residents with one resident reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the representative of changes in weight for Resident (R) 1. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) listed diagnoses of schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication, and fragmentation of thought), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), and heart disease.R1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS noted R1 weighed 139 pounds, had a mechanically altered diet, and had no chewing or swallowing issues. The MDS noted the resident had a significant weight loss.R1's Care Plan documented R1 had potential nutritional problems related to a history of weight loss,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 23 residents. The sample included 14 residents with one resident reviewed for hospitalization. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 1 a written notification of transfer to the resident and/or his representative as soon as practicable. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), heart failure (a condition where the heart muscle is weakened and cannot pump blood effectively enough to meet the body's needs) schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication, and fragmentation of thought), and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion).R1's EMR documented a Health Status Note dated 08/24/25 at 07:00 AM that documented R1 was barely responsive with rapid breaths. The provider was notified and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 23 residents; the sample included three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent further falls after a fall for Resident (R) 7 and 14.Findings included:- R7's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) documented diagnoses that included anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), hallucination (sensing things while awake that appear to be real, but the mind created), history of falls, and cognitive decline. R7's 07/14/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented R7 had two or more falls within the last quarter.R7's Care Plan documented R7 was at high risk for falls related to confusion, incontinence, being unaware of safety needs, vision and hearing problems, and wandering; initiated on 02/02/24. Staff were to place R7's wheelchair by her bed, and anti-roll back brakes were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 13 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 23 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to use adequate hand hygiene when caring for residents. Additionally, staff failed to disinfect the mechanical lift after use. Findings included:- Observation on 09/22/25 at 12:46 PM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) P brought the mechanical lift to the room and transferred Resident(R) 9 to the bed. R9 had been incontinent of a large soft stool. CMA R washed R9's buttocks, removed her gloves, and washed her hands, then applied new gloves and gathered more wipes out of the packet. They rolled R9 onto her back, and CNA P performed front peri care; she took her gloves off and applied new gloves without hand hygiene, then applied barrier cream. CNA P then removed her gloves and applied clean gloves again without hand hygiene. CNA P then took a new outfit out of R9's closet, and they dressed R9. Staff removed the lift from R9's room and placed it into R3's room with no sanitation completed on the lift by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 23 residents; the sample included 14. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff adhered to the principles of antibiotic stewardship through monitoring for the appropriate use of antibiotics prescribed for Resident (R) 2 to prevent antibiotic resistance and spread of multidrug resistant organisms within the facility. Findings included:- R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest).R2's 09/08/25 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS recorded R2 required moderate assistance from staff to complete toileting hygiene. The MDS recorded R2 was occasionally incontinent of urine, and R2 had a urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system) in the past 30 days.R2's 09/16/25 Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 23 residents. The facility identified one central kitchen with one dining area. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide proper sanitary food storage to prevent the spread of food born illness to the residents of the facility. Findings included: - Initial tour of the kitchen on 12/12/23 at 08:10 AM with Dietary Staff G revealed the following concerns: In the upright freezer: 1. One bag of tator tots unsealed and opened to air. 2. One package of hash browns opened and stored in a plastic bag, which lacked an opened date. 3. Two packages of opened french fries, opened to air, with visible freezer burn to both packages of fries. 4. One package of breaded chicken patties stored in a plastic bag with no opened date. 5. One package of breaded shrimp was open and not dated. 6. One package of chicken strips opened to air with visible freezer burn on the meat. 7. One package of chicken cordon bleu opened and undated. 8. Two packages of hot dogs stored in a plastic bag with no opened date. On 12/12/23 at 08:30 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 23 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), complete and accurate staffing information to the federal regulatory agency through Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ), related to licensed nursing staff coverage 24 hours a day. Findings included: - Review of the Payroll Base Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for the fiscal year (FY)- Quarter 4, 2022 (July 1- September 30) revealed the lack of Licensed Nursing (LN) coverage 24 hours/ seven days a week 07/10/22, Sunday (SU), 08/02/22, Tuesday (TU), 08/07/22 (SU), 08/11/22, Thursday (TH), 09/03/22 (SA), 09/04/22 (SU), 09/16/22, Friday (FR), 09/24/22, (SA) and 09/25/22, (SU). Review of the PBJ's FY Quarter 1, 2023 (October 1- December 31) revealed the lack of LN coverage 24 hour/ seven days a week for 10/02/22 (SU), 10/08/22 (SA), 10/12/22, Wednesday (WE), 10/16/22 (SU), 10/22/22 (SA), 10/30/22 (SU), 11/06/22 (SU), 11/13/22 (SU), 11/19/22 (SA), 11/24/22 (TH), 11/27/22 (SU), 11/30/22 (WE),12/04/22 (SU),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 23 residents with 12 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program with the failure of staff to follow infection control standards when delivering laundry to resident rooms, failure to place distilled water jugs on a surface other than the floor and failure of staff to appropriately clean nebulizers (a device which changes liquid medication into a mist easily inhaled into the lungs) after use. This deficient practice has the potential to lead to cross contamination between residents, and to place the residents receiving oxygen and nebulized medications at increased for respiratory infections. Findings include: - On [DATE] at 07:76 AM, Laundry Staff L observed carrying clean resident bed linens against her body from the cart in the hallway to a linen closet and then into a resident room . On [DATE] at 07:50 AM, Laundry Staff L confirmed she carried clean resident bed linens against her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility census totaled 23 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an in-service training program for nurses' aides that was appropriate and effective to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides. The facility identified three Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA's) had been employed over one year. Three of three CNAs lacked the required 12 hours of in-service training to include dementia and abuse training, to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides and appropriate care and services to all the residents of the facility. Findings included: - Review of a list of Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) employment dates revealed only three CNAs had been employed for at least 12 months. Of the three employees, only one completed training in abuse, neglect, and exploitation (ANE). None of the three employees had training dealing with dementia residents. On 12/13/23 the training log for CNA J revealed in the last 12 months the employee had 14.25 hours of training including ANE-The Elder Act. However, CNA J lacked training for working with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 23 residents with 12 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident (R) 10 related to the use of oxygen (O2) therapy, R 4 related to nebulizer treatments, and for R 16, related to no diabetic interventions on the care plan. Findings included: - R10's signed Physician Orders revealed the following diagnosis of vascular dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and heart failure (heart not functioning properly). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident had delusions and verbal behaviors on one to three days of the look back period. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed no significant changes other than the addition of oxygen (O2) use. R10's Care Plan dated 06/10/22 revealed the resident required assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 23 residents with 12 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the person-centered care plan for three residents, Resident (R) 21 regarding ambulating (walking) independently without a gait belt (a belt used to help transfer a person from one place to another, also used as an ambulation safety aid) and R13 and R24 regarding interventions related to oxygen use and nebulized (a device which changes liquid medication into a mist that is easily inhaled into the lungs) breathing treatment use. This placed the residents at risk to not receive appropriate cares and treatments. Findings included: - The Electronic Health Records (EHR) documented Resident (R)21 had the following diagnoses that included osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling, pain and stiffness), fracture of right pubis (a portion of the pelvic bone [a large basin-shaped complex of bones that connects the trunk of the body to the legs]), fracture of unspecified thoracic (chest…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 23 residents with 12 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer R22's antidepressant medication as ordered by the physician. Findings included: - R22's Physician's Order dated 01/09/23 included the diagnosis of depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of two, indicating severely impaired cognition. The Psychotropic Drug Use Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 01/19/23 was triggered, however was incomplete. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of one, indicating severely impaired cognition. The mood interview score was zero. The Care Plan dated 01/09/23 revealed R22 had depression. The Physician Orders ordered 12/07/23 revealed the following: 1. Sertraline…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 23 residents with 12 sampled, including one for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to send a copy of the facility-initiated hospitalization transfer/discharge notice to the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for Resident (R) 5. Findings Include: - Review of R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) tracking form documented the resident discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R5's Medical Record lacked evidence of written notification of the facility-initiated hospitalization transfer/discharge and bed hold to R5's Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Observation on 01/25/22 at 08:20 AM revealed R5 sat in the dining room eating. On 01/27/22 at 10:05 AM Licensed Nurse (LN) C stated she did not send a bed-hold policy with the resident when they discharged to the hospital. On 01/27/22 at 11:30 AM Administrative Nurse A stated the facility notified the Office…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 23 residents with 12 sampled including one for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a copy of the facility bed hold policy to Residents (R) 5 or his representative for his facility-initiated hospitalization. Findings Include: - Review of R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) tracking form documented the resident discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R5's Medical Record lacked evidence of written notification of the facility-initiated hospitalization transfer and bed hold to R5 or his representative. Observation on 01/25/22 at 08:20 AM revealed R5 sat in the dining room eating. On 01/27/22 at 10:05 AM Licensed Nurse (LN) C stated she did not send a bed-hold policy with the resident when they discharged to the hospital. On 01/27/22 at 11:30 AM Administrative Nurse A stated the facility went over the bed-hold policy on admission, but she would not send a policy with a resident when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-09-23 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 23 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the daily staff posting included the actual hours worked by the nursing staff as required. Findings included:- During an observation on 09/21/25 at 11:00 AM, the daily staff posting document lacked documentation of actual hours worked. Furthermore, it was difficult to read the titles of the staff Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), and Registered Nurse (RN) above the columns for the shifts.Review of the daily staff posting documents from 09/21/25 to 09/23/25 revealed a lack of documentation of actual hours worked.During an interview on 09/22/25 at 03:50 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated she had never documented the actual hours worked for the posted staff sheet.The facility did not provide a policy for posted nursing staff.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2025-09-23 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 23 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit accurate staffing information through Payroll-Based Journaling (PBJ). Findings included:- The PBJ Staffing Data Report for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 Quarter 3 (April 1 - June 30) documented the facility had excessively low staffing. FY 2024 Quarter 4 (July 1 - September 30) documented facility failed to have licensed nursing (LN) coverage 24 hours on the following days: 07/05/24, 07/06/24, 07/07/24. 07/10/24/ 07/11/24, 07/19/24, 07/20/24, 08/04/24, 08/08/24, 09/01/24, 09/05/24, 09/27/24, 09/28/24, and 09/29/24. FY 2025 Quarter 2 (January 1 - March 31) documented facility failed to have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours on the following days: 01/01/25, 01/02/25, 01/03/25, 01/04/25, 01/05/25, 01/18/25, 02/22/25, 03/03/25, 03/17/25, and 03/22/25.Review of the Daily Nurse Staffing Form and Payroll Data Sheets indicated the days listed above were covered with the appropriate staff, with LN coverage 24 hours each day. Additionally, no concerns with low weekend…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 17E580. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next