Sunset Home INC
620 Second Avenue, Concordia, KS 66901 · Non profit - Other · 45 certified beds · (785) 243-2720 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $34,085 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-16)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.7% | 17.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.6% | 4.9% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.7% | 1.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.6% | 2.9% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.9% | 6.5% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.7% | 4.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.2% | 16.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 29.4% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.2% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.3% | 4.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 31.6% | 22.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.2% | 18.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.9% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 40.0% | 73.8% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.2% | 22.4% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 46.1% | 11.5% | 12.0% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.34 | 1.80 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.92 | 2.13 | 1.80 | worse |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
38.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 38 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 53.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 38.4%CMS range 24.5–51.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 7.8–18.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 53.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 40.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.5%CMS range 3.1–14.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.39 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-07-11 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with one closed record for death, reviewed. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to Resident (R) 41, who desired resuscitative measures indicated by his full code status (code status determination for residents who wish to receive CPR). On [DATE] at 05:00 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G observed R41 with irregular respirations. At 05:10 PM, LN G checked on R41 again and identified R41 had no pulse or respirations. Without considering R41's code status or initiating CPR, LN G placed a call to R41's representative, who did not answer. LN G then called Administrative Nurse E who informed LN G that R41 was a full code and directed LN G to start CPR. At 05:22 PM, LN G activated 911 and then initiated CPR. The facility failed to ensure staff immediately initiated CPR upon identification of R41's cardiac arrest when staff delayed 12 minutes to place calls to resources…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 38 residents with three residents reviewed for resident's rights. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to promote Resident (R) 1's right to choose, failed to respect R1's wishes, and failed to treat R1 with dignity and respect. On 12/05/24 at approximately 09:30 PM, R1 sat in his room in his wheelchair. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O heard another CNA say R1 did not want to go to bed. CNA M and CNA N went into R1's room and made R1 go to bed despite his protest. R1 became resistant to the transfer from his wheelchair to the bed and started hitting and kicking out at CNA M and CNA N. R1 yelled, No, no, no, no, and Get out of here. CNA O entered R1's room and observed R1 lying on his bed with his arms and legs up in a defensive position. CNA O told CNA M and CNA N they could not force R1 to go to bed. This deficient practice created psychosocial impairment and placed him at risk for injury, impaired dignity, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 36 residents with three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 1 with care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure ulcer development. R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] without any skin issues to her buttock but had crevices to her bilateral heels from previous pressure ulcers. The facility failed to initiate a turning/repositioning program, cushion for wheelchair, or bilateral heel protectors/offloading to prevent R1 from developing pressure ulcers. On 03/27/23 R1 obtained suspected deep tissue injuries to her left sacrum and bilateral heels. R1's left sacrum wound later progressed into a Stage 4 pressure ulcer (a deep wound that reaches the muscles, ligaments, or even bone) and R1's right heel ulcers progressed to Stage 3 (full thickness pressure injury extending through the skin into the tissue below). This deficient practice also placed R1 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-26 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 39 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the services of a full-time certified dietary manager for 39 residents who resided in the facility and received their meals from the kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition. Findings included: - On 03/24/25 at 09:00 AM, observation in the facility kitchen revealed three staff working, including Dietary Staff BB who stated she was the dietary manager. She stated she started about three months ago, and was not certified. Dietary Staff BB stated she had just started taking the classes for Certified Dietary Manager. On 03/26/25 at 02:32 PM, Administrative Staff A verified the facility's Dietary Manager was not certified. The facility Failed to provide a policy for Qualified Dietary Managers. The facility failed to provide the services of a full-time certified dietary manager for 39 residents who resided in the facility and received their meals from the kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 39 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection monitoring surveillance plan and Enhanced Barrier Protection (EBP - infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) as staff wore gown and gloves (PPE - gowns, face shields and/or eyeglasses/goggles, and gloves) in the hallway. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for exposure to infectious processes. Findings included: - On 03/25/25 at 08:25 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M wore a yellow protective gown and gloves while pushing a resident in a wheelchair to the dining room. CNA M then went to a closet next to the dining room area and opened it with the PPE on. CNA M stated she wore the gown in the hallway so that the surveyor would know what she looked like in one. CNA M then proceeded to remove the gown and gloves in the service hall next to the dining room. On 03/26/25 at 11:30 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove expired medication from use and failed to date one insulin pen when opened. This deficient practice placed residents who may have received those medications at risk for ineffective medication. Findings included: - On 03/24/25 at 09:07 AM, observation of the one facility medication room revealed 14 bisacodyl (laxative) suppositories with an expiration date of November 2024 and a container of aspirin/diphenhydramine (pain relief/sleep aide) 500/25 milligrams (mg) tablets, expired December 2024. On 03/24/25 at 09:22 AM, the facility's nurse treatment cart contained an opened, undated glargine insulin pen. On 03/24/25 at 09:07 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G verified the medications in the medication room were expired and she disposed of them. On 03/24/25 at 09:22 AM, LN H verified staff should have dated the insulin pen when they opened it for use. On 03/26/25 at 07:50 AM, Administrative Staff D verified staff were to date insulin pens…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an environment that promoted the dignity of Resident (R) 34, who had blood sugar testing and insulin administration, and R9, who also had insulin administration in the facility's dining room with other residents, staff, and visitors.0 This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for an undignified experience and embarrassment. Findings included: - On 03/25/25 at 11:21 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) I performed a finger stick to obtain a drop of blood for testing R4's blood sugar level. R34, seated across the same table, stated, I'm glad that's not me, I don't like needles. LN I then retrieved an insulin pen and injected insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) subcutaneously (beneath the skin) into R4's right arm at the dining room table. On 03/25/25 at 11:29 AM, LN I administered R9's insulin subcutaneously while seated in the dining room. The table R9 sat at had two other residents and a visitor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to keep Resident (R) 35 free from verbal abuse during transport in the facility bus. This deficient practice placed R35 at risk for fear or mental anguish. Findings included: - R35's electronic medical record included diagnoses for cerebral infarction (stroke) causing hemiplegia (refers to complete paralysis on one side of the body) affecting the left side, cerebral edema (swelling of the brain tissue), and muscle weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented R35 was dependent on staff for mobility, dressing, and hygiene. He used a manual wheelchair, had one non-injury fall, and a history of falls before admission. R35's Care Plan, dated 11/04/24, directed staff to transfer R35 with two staff and a total mechanical lift, initiated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff reported an allegation of verbal abuse from Resident (R) 35 to the administrator immediately to investigate. This placed R35 at risk for ongoing abuse and or mistreatment. Findings included: - R35's electronic medical record included diagnoses for cerebral infarction (stroke) causing hemiplegia (refers to complete paralysis on one side of the body) affecting the left side, cerebral edema (swelling of the brain tissue), and muscle weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented R35 was dependent on staff for mobility, dressing, and hygiene. He used a manual wheelchair, had one non-injury fall, and had a history of falls before admission. R35's Care Plan, dated 11/04/24, directed staff to transfer R35 with two staff and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate the allegation of verbal abuse immediately. This placed Resident (R) 35 at risk for ongoing abuse and or mistreatment. Findings included: - R35's electronic medical record included diagnoses for cerebral infarction (stroke) causing hemiplegia (refers to complete paralysis on one side of the body) affecting the left side, cerebral edema (swelling of the brain tissue), and muscle weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented R35 was dependent on staff for mobility, dressing, and hygiene. He used a manual wheelchair, had one non-injury fall, and had a history of falls before admission. R35's Care Plan, dated 11/04/24, directed staff to transfer R35 with two staff and a total mechanical lift, initiated 11/04/24.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on the record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 126's transfer or discharge was documented in the resident's medical record and appropriate information was communicated to the receiving healthcare institution or provider. This placed R126 at risk for delayed treatment at the receiving institution. Findings included: - R126's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of dorsalgia (discomfort occurring anywhere on the spine or back, ranging from mild to disabling), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) disorder, chronic (persisting for a long period) kidney disease, diabetes mellites (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure), atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), multiple fractures (broken bone) of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 126 with an appropriate bed hold policy as required. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk of being unable to return to the facility in the same room or bed. Findings included: -R126's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of dorsalgia (discomfort occurring anywhere on the spine or back, ranging from mild to disabling), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) disorder, chronic (persisting for a long period) kidney disease, diabetes mellites (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure), atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), multiple fractures (broken bone) of ribs, low back pain and history of disease of the blood-forming organs. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an appropriate cover or dressing for Resident (R) 11's open pressure ulcer (PU) of her left heel. This deficient practice placed R11 at risk for pain or infection. Findings included: - R11's Electronic Medical Record documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion) and left hip fracture (broken bone). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, indicating severely impaired decision-making. The MDS documented R11 required moderate staff assistance for bathing and maximum staff assistance for dressing her lower body and shoes. The MDS documented R11 had PU and PU care was provided. R11's Care Plan, dated 01/10/25, directed staff to monitor and document wound size, depth, granulation, and progress in healing. Notify the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 10 had physician-ordered fluid intake, which placed R10 at risk of ongoing urinary tract infections. Findings included: - R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of heart failure, weakness, intellectual disabilities (a significantly below-average score on a test of mental ability or intelligence and limitations in the ability to function in areas of daily life), neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (the muscles that control the flow of urine out of the body do not relax and prevent the bladder from fully emptying), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and chronic (persisting for a long period) kidney disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented R10 had intact cognition, no signs or symptoms of delirium…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 10 had physician-ordered fluid intake, which placed R10 at risk of ongoing dehydration and urinary tract infections. Findings included: - R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of heart failure, weakness, intellectual disabilities (a significantly below-average score on a test of mental ability or intelligence and limitations in the ability to function in areas of daily life), neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (the muscles that control the flow of urine out of the body do not relax and prevent the bladder from fully emptying), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and chronic (persisting for a long period) kidney disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented R10 had intact cognition, no signs or symptoms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's consultant pharmacist failed to notify the director of nursing or R34's physician of the lack of monitoring R34's blood pressure as the physician ordered to monitor the effectiveness of her medication, placing R34 at risk of receiving unnecessary medication. Findings included: - R34's Electronic Medical Record documented diagnoses of hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure), transient cerebral ischemic attack (TIA - temporary episode of inadequate blood supply to the brain), and anemia (inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented R34 received antidepressant (class of medications used to treat mood disorders), diuretic (medication to promote the formation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor Resident (R)34's blood pressure as the physician ordered to monitor the effectiveness of her medication. This deficient practice placed R34 at risk of receiving unnecessary medication. Findings included: - R34's Electronic Medical Record documented diagnoses of hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure), transient cerebral ischemic attack (TIA - temporary episode of inadequate blood supply to the brain), and anemia (inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented R34 received antidepressant (class of medications used to treat mood disorders), diuretic (medication to promote the formation and excretion of urine), and opioid (narcotic) medications. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-07-11 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 36 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility administration failed to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for the 36 residents who reside in the facility which placed all residents at risk for decreased health and wellbeing. Findings included: - The facility failed to ensure staff provided cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to Resident (R) 41, who desired resuscitative measures indicated by his full code status (code status determination for residents who wish to receive CPR). On [DATE] at 05:00 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G observed R41 with irregular respirations. At 05:10 PM, LN G checked on R41 again and identified R41 had no pulse or respirations. Without considering R41's code status or initiating CPR, LN G placed a call to R41's representative, who did not answer. LN G then called Administrative Nurse E who informed LN G that R41 was a full code and directed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-07-11 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) program failed to provide good faith efforts to identify multiple issues of concern. This placed the residents at risk for decreased quality of care and life. Findings included: - The facility failed to provide mail service on Saturdays. Refer to F576. The facility failed to complete Care Area Assessment Summaries. Refer to F636. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for accidents. Refer to F656. The facility failed to review and revise care plan for safe transfers. Refer to F657. The facility failed to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in a timely manner, and failed to maintain a system to verify CPR certifications for licensed staff. Refer to F678. The facility failed to provide safe transfers and accident prevention. Refer to F689. The facility failed to ensure competent nursing staff. Refer to F726. The facility failed to act on recommendation from the Registered Pharmacist. Refer to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-07-11 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility lacked evidence the required committee members attended the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee quarterly meetings. This placed the residents who resided in the facility at risk for decreased quality of care. Findings included: - On 07/11/23 at 10:30AM, the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting attendance sheets lacked signatures of attendees/committee members on the sheets. The sheets had just a Yes or No placed by the typde name of members who allegedly attended the meetings. On 07/11/23 at 10:30AM, Administrative Staff A stated the facility used to sign in for meetings but they now documented Yes or No if member attended meeting on an electronic form. She confirmed the facility did not document proof or signatures. Upon request the facility did not provide a QAPI policy. The facility failed to retain evidence the required QAA and QAPI members attended meetings at least quarterly which placed residents at risk of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections when the facility failed to develop a water management plan to minimize the risk for development of Legionella (type of bacteria that can cause serious lung infections) or other waterborne pathogens (agents that cause disease or infection) from entering the facility water system. Findings included: - On 07/11/23 at 07:44 AM, when asked to see the facility's water management plan, Maintenance Staff (MS) U stated he had never heard of Legionella disease. On 07/11/23 at 10:11 AM, Administrative Staff A stated she was unaware of any facility system or plan in place for water management to minimize the risk for developing Legionella. Administrative Staff A stated the city tested the city water. Upon request the facility failed to provide a policy regarding Legionella. The facility failed to develop a water management plan for detecting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-07-11 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide an designated and certified Infection Preventionist (IP) to manage and monitor the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) for the 36 residents who resided in the facility. This placed the residents at risk for infections and health problems. Findings included: - On 07/05/23 at 12:30 PM, Administrative Staff A stated the facility had no certified IP to provide oversight and monitor the facility's IPCP in the facility. Administrative Staff A stated she was enrolled in the IP program but had not completed it. Upon request the facility failed to provide a policy regarding IP. The facility failed to provide an IP who held the required certification to manage and monitor the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program for the 36 residents who resided in the facility. This placed the residents at risk for infections and health problems.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-11 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to fully complete comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment Section V, Care Area Assessment Summary (CAA) for Resident (R) 7, R23, R3, R28, and R93 to include an analysis and rationale for care planning decisions. This placed these residents at risk for not accurately reflecting each resident's status and needs to develop an individualized comprehensive plan of care. Findings included: - R7's admission MDS with assessment reference date (ARD) of 01/27/23 Section V Care Area Assessment (CAA) was not completed. R23's Annual MDS with ARD of 11/02/22 Section V CAA was not completed. R3's Annual MDS with ARD of 10/27/22 Section V CAA was not completed. R28's admission MDS with ARD of 02/07/23Section V CAA was not completed. R93's admission MDS with ARD of 06/12/23 Section V CAA was not completed. The Resident Assessment Instrument Manual version 3.0 states, the CAA process provides a framework for guiding the review of triggered areas, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 15 residents with one closed record for death reviewed. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses possessed the knowledge and skills to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for Resident (R) 41, who desired resuscitative measures indicated by his full code status. This placed the full code status residents at risk for receiving inadequate resuscitative measures. Findings included: - R41's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R41 had diagnoses of depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness), polyneuropathy (nerve disease, that affects many nerves), and dependence on wheelchair for mobility. R41's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R41 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R41 required extensive staff assistance with activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess and record the refrigerator temperatures in the medication room and failed to discard an expired medication in the same refrigerator. This placed the residents who received medications from the refrigerators at risk for receiving less potent or unintended effects from the medications. Findings included: - On 07/06/23 at 02:54 PM, observation in the medication room refrigerator revealed a one-half full box of bisacodyl (laxative )suppositories that expired 03/2023. On 07/06/23 at 02:54 PM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S verified the above finding and stated she would discard the suppositories in the trash. CMA S stated night shift was responsible for checking outdates (expiration dates) in the medication room. Review of the medication room refrigerator temperature logs revealed the following: April 2023- lacked documentation on 13 days. May 2023- lacked documentation on 14 days. June 2023- lacked documentation on 14 days.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-11 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 36 resident. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to complete a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident (R)25 who had a change in activities of daily living (ADL). This placed the resident at risk for unidentified care needs. Findings included: - R25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented he had diagnoses of unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance (impaired cognition, anxiety, agitation), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), convulsions (muscles contract and relax quickly and cause uncontrolled shaking of the body), and Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often causing tremors). R25's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The MDS documented R25 transferred and ambulated independently and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 15 residents with two reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed failed to develop a plan of care with meaningful fall prevention interventions for Resident (R)29 who had two falls. This placed the resident at increased risk for falls and fall-related injury. Findings included: - R29's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R29 had diagnoses of intellectual disability, localized (one area) edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), and venous insufficiency (a condition in which the flow of blood through the veins is blocked, causing blood to pool in the legs). R29's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R29 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 10, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R29 required extensive staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) except supervision with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to revise Resident (R) 25's care plan for accidents. This placed the resident at risk for injury related to uncommunicated or unmet care needs. Findings included: - R25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented he had diagnoses of unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance (impaired cognition, anxiety, agitation), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), convulsions (muscles contract and relax quickly and cause uncontrolled shaking of the body), and Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often causing tremors). R25's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The MDS documented R25 transferred and ambulated independently and required minimal assistance with transfers.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide adequate assistance and safety with transfers for Resident (R) 25 and failed to identify and implement interventions to prevent falls for R29 who had two falls. This placed the residents at risk for future falls and related injury. Findings included: - R25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented he had diagnoses of unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance (impaired cognition, anxiety, agitation), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), convulsions (muscles contract and relax quickly and cause uncontrolled shaking of the body), and Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often causing tremors). R25's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a process to acknowledge and respond to the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) recommendation for an appropriate indication for the continued use of an antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing) for Resident (R) 25. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for unnecessary psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medications. Findings included: - R25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented he had diagnoses of unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance (impaired cognition, anxiety, agitation), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), convulsions (muscles contract and relax quickly and cause uncontrolled shaking of the body), and Parkinson's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication, or a documented physician rationale which included the multiple unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management and risk versus benefits for the continued use of an antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing) for Resident (R) 25's This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for unnecessary psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medications. Findings included: - R25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented he had diagnoses of unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance (impaired cognition, anxiety, agitation), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), convulsions (muscles contract and relax…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-01-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation and interview, the facility staff failed to store, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards in 1 of 1 facility kitchens when staff touched a trash can lid, touched other objects, and continued to serve residents with the same contaminated gloves, when staff placed three different types of meat in the same container to thaw, and failed to label ice cream with an expiration date. This placed the 29 residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the facility kitchen at risk for acquiring a food borne illness. Findings included: - 01/04/22 at 08:58 AM, observation revealed in the walk-in refrigerator, in the kitchen, a package of ham slices, a 12 ounce (oz) package of bologna, and a 32 oz package of sliced turkey breast thawing in the same pan. On 01/04/22 at 08:58 AM, observation revealed in the snack refrigerator four strawberry, two chocolate, two vanilla, and two orange containers of ice cream without an expiration date. On 01/05/22 at 11:20…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-01-10 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents with four reviewed for Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Beneficiary Liability notices. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide form CMS 10055, Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN), which included the estimated cost for continued services for skilled services to the resident or their representative for the four residents, Resident (R) 24, R82, R83, and R84. This deficient practice placed all four residents at risk for uninformed decisions and unanticipated costs related to skilled services. Findings included: - The Medicare ABN form informed the beneficiaries that Medicare may not pay for future skilled therapy and did not provide an estimated cost to continue their services. The form included an option for the beneficiary to (1) receive specified services listed, and bill Medicare for an official decision on payment. I understand if Medicare does not pay, I will be responsible for payment, but can appeal to Medicare. (2) receive therapy listed, but do not bill…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-01-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 29 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to prepare four residents' pureed diets by methods that conserve nutritive value when staff failed to measure ingredients and serving sizes for each residents' plate, placing the residents at risk for nonnutritive food items and inappropriate serving size of each food item. Findings included: - On 01/06/22 at 11:03 AM Dietary Staff (DS) CC stated the facility had four pureed diets of meat. Further observation revealed DS CC placed three 4 ounce (oz) servings of broccoli into a blender container, poured an unmeasured amount of hot water from the dispenser into the blender and blended the ingredients together, to make the consistency of pudding. Observation revealed DS CC poured the unmeasured ingredients onto three divided plates. DS CC placed four (4 oz) chicken fried steaks into a clean blender container, added unmeasured beef broth into the container and blended to consistency of pudding. Further observation revealed DS CC poured the unmeasured pureed chicken fried…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents with six reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 7 with the appropriate fitted shoes, placing him at risk for falling. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR), documented R7 had diagnoses of generalized muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain). R7's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had short and long term memory problems, independent with ADLs except supervision with eating. R7's MDS documented it was very important to him to choose what clothes to wear. R7's ADL Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R7 used a cane when ambulating. R7's ADL Care Plan, revised on 10/20/21, documented the resident independent with dressing but may require staff supervision to ensure the task is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-10 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the resident or resident representative with written information regarding the facility bed hold policy, when Resident (R) 8 was transferred to the hospital. This placed R8 at risk for not being permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility. Findings included: - R8's Electronic Medical Record (EMS) documented the resident had diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) with behavioral disturbance, hallucinations (sensing things while awake that appear to be real, but the mind created), and age related cognitive decline. R8's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of two, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. R8's MDS documented the resident required extensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to implement the Registered Dietician's (RD) recommendations for Resident (R) 13, who had a documented weight loss. On 11/19/21 the RD recommended to increase R13's Med Pass 2.0 (a high calorie nutritional supplement) from 60 milliliters (ml) three times daily to 120 ml three daily in response to a 4.11 percent (%) unintended weight loss in 43 days. The facility failed to implement the recommendation until 01/06/22 at which time R13 had a significant weight loss of 11.47 % in three months. Findings included: - R13's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) listed diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment, weakness, frontotemporal dementia (group of brain disorders that primarily affect the frontal and temporal lobes of the brain which are generally associated with personality, behavior and language), and functional dyspepsia (indigestion). R13's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility's Consultant Pharmacist failed to report to the Director of Nursing, physician, and medical director the failure to identify an inappropriate diagnosis and monitor behaviors for the use of an antipsychotic medication (class of medications used to treat any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing and other mental emotional conditions) for one of five sampled residents, Resident (R) 22. This placed R22 at risk for adverse side effects. Findings included: - R22's Physician Order Sheet, dated 12/01/21, recorded the diagnoses of dementia with behavioral disturbance (agitation, wandering, verbal and physical aggression). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R22 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to identify an inappropriate diagnosis and monitor behaviors for the use of an antipsychotic medication (class of medications used to treat any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing and other mental emotional conditions) for one of five sampled residents, Resident (R) 22. This placed R22 at risk for adverse side effects. Findings included: - R22's Physician Order Sheet, dated 12/01/21, recorded the diagnoses of dementia with behavioral disturbance, (agitation, wandering, verbal and physical aggression). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) , dated 12/10/21, recorded R22 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS recorded the resident required moderate assistance with bed mobility and transfers. The MDS further recorded R22 received antipsychotic medication on a daily basis. The Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-10 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one reviewed for hospice services. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to establish and document routine communication between the hospice provider and facility staff which included a plan of care available to facility staff directing what services, equipment, and medication were provided to Resident (R) 21, placing him at risk for delayed or inadequate cares due to lack of communication and/or collaberation between facility staff and hospice care providers. Findings included: - R21's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented the resident had diagnoses of acute kidney failure (condition when an abrupt reduction in kidneys' ability to filter waste products occurs within a few hours or a few days), occlusion and stenosis of carotid artery (narrowing of the blood vessels (carotid arteries) in the neck restricting the blood flow to brain and head), and bradycardia (slow heart rate). The Quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-07-11 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide mail delivery to resident's in the facility on Saturday's. Findings included: - On 07/06/23 at 10:15AM, during a confidential meeting with five of the resident council members, they verbalized mail was not being delivered on Saturdays. On 07/06/23 at 11:50AM, Social Service X verified mail was not delivered on Saturday to facility residents. Social Services X stated the mail was taken to the business office and then passed out to residents on Mondays. The facility undated, Resident Right's policy, stated the resident's in the facility have the right to send and receive mail. The facility failed to distribute resident mail on Saturdays.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$34,085 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $8,678 — penalty dated 2024-12-16
- $14,918 — penalty dated 2023-10-19
- $10,489 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| RYSER, CAITLAN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 12/01/2015 |
| SHORE, TERESA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/21/2016 |
| FREEBORN, JOANN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2022 |
| HAYDEN, JAROLD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 09/03/2003 |
| JOHNSON, ERIC | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/27/2015 |
| WORTHEN, GREGORY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175422. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.