No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Derby Health & Rehabilitation, LLC

731 Klein Circle, Derby, KS 67037 · For profit - Corporation · 74 certified beds · (316) 719-2400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (316) 719-2400 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Apr 2024
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Apr 2024
  • nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1918 N Rock Rd · (316) 351-8735 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1101 N Rock Rd · (316) 788-6669 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1624 N Rock Rd · (316) 554-2120 · Call to confirm hours
Park
High Park0.5 mi
2801 E James St · (316) 788-0301 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.7%17.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.4%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%1.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.8%2.9%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.4%6.5%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.5%4.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.8%16.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.0%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.9%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.5%4.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.0%22.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.3%18.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.9%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.2%73.8%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.2%22.4%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.9%11.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.231.801.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.962.131.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 518 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

65.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
66.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.67U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.34hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.27hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 66.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 274 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.67 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF65.4%CMS range 61.4–68.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 8.2–11.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge66.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge62.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.2%CMS range 3.1–7.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.761.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
1.32
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.08
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.99
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
60.7%
Total nursing turnover
57.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 74 beds and averages 67.0 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.08 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.31 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-11)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-30)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 61 residents. The sample included 15 residents with three residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a written notification of transfer for facility-initiated transfers to Resident (R) 22, R77, and R78 and/or their representative for all applicable transfers/discharges. The facility further failed to notify the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) of transfers/discharges for R22, R77, and R78. Findings included:- R22 admitted to the facility on [DATE], the facility transferred him to the hospital on [DATE], and he re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R77 admitted to the facility on [DATE], and the facility transferred her to the hospital on [DATE]. R77 did not readmit to the facility. R78 admitted to the facility on [DATE], and the facility transferred her to the hospital on [DATE]. R78 did not readmit to the facility. Upon request, the facility was unable to provide a written notification of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 61 residents; the sample included five residents reviewed unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review revealed the facility failed to obtain physician-ordered orthostatic blood pressures as part of an evaluation following complaints of dizziness and lightheadedness. Findings included:- R45's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) and hypotension (low blood pressure). R45's 02/18/26 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14, indicating intact cognition. R45's Care Plan documented that R45 used an antihypotensive medication for hypotension; initiated on 03/08/26. The plan directed staff to monitor and document side effects and the effectiveness of the medication. R45's Care Plan instructed staff to verify blood pressure and pulse prior to giving this medication; initiated on 03/08/26. R45's Progress Note had an Encounter note dated 02/27/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 69 residents. The sample included seven residents with three residents reviewed for accident hazards. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment free from accident hazards for two residents, Resident (R)1 and R2 when staff failed to provide adequate hands-on stabilization of the resident from the second staff member during full body mechanical lift transfers. This deficient practice placed R1 and R2 at risk for accidents and injuries related to mechanical lift transfers. Findings included: - During an observation on 04/29/25 at 12:19 PM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) G and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) H performed a full body mechanical lift transfer for R1 from her recliner to a wheelchair. CMA G operated the controls of the lift with the legs positioned wide. CMA G raised R1 into the air using the lift. While R1 was in the raised position, CNA H released physical control and stabilization of R1, walked around the lift, R1 and CMA G and stood behind R1's wheelchair. CMA G then pushed the lift with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 61 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure hazardous chemicals were stored safely. This placed the five residents identified by the facility as cognitively impaired and independently mobile at risk for accidents and hazard-related injuries. Findings included: - On 04/24/24 at 08:13 AM, observation in the 300-household revealed an unlocked housekeeping closet with the following hazardous items with Keep out of reach of children instructions stored on a waist-high shelf: One small can of fiberglass resin. One quart bottle of tile sealer. One spray bottle of ant killer. One spray can of ant and roach killer. On 04/24/24 at 08:15 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M verified the findings. On 04/24/24 at 09:01 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified staff should ensure housekeeping closets were locked when not under supervision. The facility's Chemical Storage policy, dated 03/12/24, stated all chemicals that are deemed hazardous to residents would be stored in a locked area or used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 61 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner for residents in two of four kitchens and dining rooms. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings included: - On 04/24/24 at 09:07 AM, observation in the 100-household kitchen freezer revealed a bag of chicken tenders, undated, and a box of hamburger patties opened, and the plastic bag torn leaving the patties open to air. On 04/24/24 at 12:17 PM, observation in the 300-household dining room revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M served plated food to residents. CNA M touched a resident's shoulders and chair, rubbed his face, and did not wash or sanitize his hands before serving more residents' plates. CNA M wiped his hands on his clothing, scratched his hair rubbed his face numerous times, and continued serving all 12 residents in the dining room without washing or sanitizing his hands. On 04/24/24 at 02:15 PM, observation of the 100 and 300 household kitchens revealed both…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 61 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)8, R11, and R160, or their representative, the completed Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notices (ABN) Form 10055. This placed the resident at risk of uninformed decisions about their skilled services. Findings included: - The Medicare ABN form 10055 informed the beneficiary that Medicare may not pay for future skilled therapy services. The form included an option for the beneficiary to receive specific services listed, and bill Medicare for an official decision on payment. The form stated 1) I understand if Medicare does not pay, I will be responsible for payment but can make an appeal to Medicare, (2) receive therapy listed, but do not bill Medicare, I am responsible for payment for services, (3) I do not want the listed services. A review of the ABN provided to R8 revealed the resident received the wrong form. R8 received the CMS-R-131 instead of CMS Form 10055. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 61 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from abuse when multiple residents' medications were misappropriated. This deficient practice placed all residents who had controlled medications stored in the facility at risk for further misappropriation and impaired care related to missing or stolen medications. Findings included: - The facility's investigation report 6803 dated 04/03/24 documented on 03/25/24, Administrative Nurse E noted Resident (R)162's entire card of oxycodone (schedule II opioid pain medication with high use for misuse or addiction) five milligrams (mg) tablets were missing. The pharmacy delivered the card on 03/22/24 and it was received by Licensed Nurse (LN) H. Per the log, the card had 12 pills. The pharmacy was contacted and confirmed that on 03/22/23 at 07:00 PM, LN H received and signed for three narcotic cards including oxycodone 5 mg (12 pills), oxycodone-acetaminophen 5/325 mg (20 pills), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 61 residents. The sample included 15 residents of which two were reviewed for the gastrostomy tube (G-tube: surgical creation of an artificial opening into the stomach through the abdominal wall) feeding management. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide G-tube care per the physician's orders for Resident (R)41 when staff failed to administer the required amount of water prior to the nutritional feeding through the G-tube. This placed the resident at risk for G-tube related complications. Finding included: - R41's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnosis of dysphasia (swallowing difficulty), cerebrovascular accident (CVA-stroke- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), and diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 61 residents. The sample included 15 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary drugs. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist identified and reported Resident (R) 47's blood pressure medication administered outside the physician-ordered blood pressure parameters. This deficient practice placed R47 at risk for unnecessary medications and related complications. Findings included: - R47's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses including end-stage renal disease (ESRD-a terminal disease of the kidneys), atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), and hypocalcemia (abnormally low level of calcium in the blood). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented R47 required supervision for eating and was dependent on staff assistance for toileting, bathing, and dressing. R47 received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 61 residents. The sample included 15 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary drugs. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to hold Resident (R) 47's blood pressure medication per the physician-ordered blood pressure parameters. This deficient practice placed R47 at risk for unnecessary medications and related complications. Findings included: - R47's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses including end-stage renal disease (ESRD-a terminal disease of the kidneys), atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), and hypocalcemia (abnormally low level of calcium in the blood). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented R47 required supervision for eating and was dependent on staff assistance for toileting, bathing, and dressing. R47 received antianxiety (a class of medications that calm and relax people) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 69 residents with 20 residents sampled, including four residents reviewed for accidents. Based on interview, record review and observation, the facility failed to initiate the planned intervention for one of the four sampled, Resident (R)2, with the use of a motion alarm placed under the resident in bed/chair/wheelchair, to prevent further falls. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)2's electronic medical record (EMR), included a diagnosis of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, indicating severe cognitive impairment. She required extensive assistance of one staff for transfers and walking and had impairment on her bilateral upper extremities. She used a walker or a wheelchair for locomotion. She had one non-injury fall since admission. The Falls Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 10/16/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 69 resident with 20 selected for review which included three residents reviewed for urinary catheter/urinary tract infections. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary catheter care for two of the three sampled resident's (R)30 and R55, to prevent urinary tract infections. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)30's Physician Order Sheet, dated 10/16/22, revealed diagnoses included heart failure, cerebral vascular disorder (stroke) aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function) and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (dysfunction of the urinary bladder caused by a lesion of the nervous system). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with normal cognitive function, required extensive assistance of one staff for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. The resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. The Dehydration/Fluid Maintenance Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 69 residents with two residents reviewed for labeling of insulin pens. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure correct expiration dating/labeling of insulin (a medication used to lower blood sugar levels) for sampled residents (R) 29 and R17. Findings included: - Observation, on [DATE] at 09:02 AM, revealed resident (R)17's Novolog flex pen, (a device containing insulin for the administration of insulin), contained a label in which staff documented the open date of [DATE] and the expiration date written as [DATE]. The resident's Lantus Solostar insulin pen lacked a label from the pharmacy as required and staff wrote the dates on them. Observation, on [DATE] at 09:15 AM, revealed staff documented the open date of [DATE] on R29's Lantus Solostar insulin pen and documented the expiration date of [DATE]. The resident's Humalog insulin pen contained and open date of [DATE], with the expiration date written as [DATE]. Interview, on [DATE] at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-11-08 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 69 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the daily staff postings included the actual hours worked by the nursing staff as required. Findings included: - Review of the Daily Staffing for August, September and October 2022 columns for staff number and hours with daily total documented for RN, LPN and CNA. None of these sheets contained the actual hours worked. The one dated 09/16/22, revealed two RN (registered nurse) unit managers from 08:00AM to 05:00PM, day shift RN indicated one, with hours worked as 12, and one night shift RN with 12 hours. The daily total of RN's was four, and the total hours was 48. Review of the nursing schedule provided by the facility which did not include the two nurse managers, revealed no RN coverage for the day. Interview, on 11/02/22 at 02:13 PM, with Administrative Staff A, revealed she updated the daily staff posting as needed. Interview, on 11/09/22 at 02:59 PM, with Administrative Nurse D, revealed on 09/16/22 the daily staff posting, included the 24 hours…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AXIOM HEALTHCARE ALLIANCE, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 09/01/2020
AXIOM CONSULTING LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST9%since 07/07/2015
DENNIS L. ROSS POD TO TRUSTEE OF DENNIS L. ROSS LIVING TRUST U/A 4/4/1Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 09/01/2020
MATT LILLIE INVESTMENTS, INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 09/01/2020
ROGER EVANS REVOCABLE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 09/01/2020
WICHITA WELLNESS INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST11%since 09/01/2020
EVANS, ROGERIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 09/01/2020
HERMES, FREDERICKIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE9%since 09/01/2020
LAKIN, GREGORYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST11%since 09/01/2020
LILLIE, MATTHEWIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 09/01/2020
ROSS, ANNIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 09/01/2020
ROSS, DENNISIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 09/01/2020
BECNEL, CHANCEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/01/2020
KRUSE, BRENDAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/22/2014
AXIOM HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/23/2009

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 38%Medicare 25%Other / private 37%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$366per resident / day
operating cost
$11,138per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$358per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175514. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next