Sunporch Of Dodge City

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 37.9 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 40 residents with four residents included in the sample. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident, Resident (R) 1 was assessed for safety related to bed rail use. Additionally, the facility failed to obtain or provide evidence of informed consent from R1 or his representative prior to the use of bed rails. Findings included:R1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented diagnoses that included vascular dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), delirium (sudden severe confusion, disorientation, and restlessness) and major depressive disorder (MDD - a major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness). R1's 12/30/25 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented that a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) interview could not be completed because the R1 is never or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-27 · tag F0730 — widespread
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 32 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an annual performance review at least once every 12 months for two Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) reviewed, to ensure adequate appropriate cares and services provided to the residents of the facility. The facility identified 12 CNAs employed over 12 the month period. Findings included: - Review of employee files on 01/27/25 at 05:08 PM revealed a lack of performance evaluations or skills check-off for two Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs), CNA S and CNA T. CNA S had a date of hire of 09/09/23 and CNA T had a date of hire of 03/11/23. On 01/27/24 at 05:20 PM, Administrative Staff A revealed all CNA staff were required to complete a skills check-off in lieu of a performance evaluation annually. If the CNA was unable to perform the required tasks satisfactorily, then remediation was performed until the CNA could perform the required tasks. Administrative Staff A further reported CNA S and CNA T were absent during the most recent skills check-off and were supposed to have made…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — widespread
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 32 residents with 12 residents sampled and five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician responded in a timely manner to monthly medication regimen reviews (MRR) for Resident (R)15, 19 and R25 related to psychotropic (any class of medications that alters mood or thought) medications and for R3 when the physician failed to provide appropriate rational when they declined a pharmacy recommended gradual dose reduction (GDR) for psychotropic medications. These deficient practices had the potential to lead to the residents receiving medications unnecessarily. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for Resident (R)15 included diagnoses of generalized dependence on wheelchair, dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 32 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow sanitary dietary standards related to the storage of food. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk related to food-borne illnesses. Findings included: - Observation of the kitchen and food storage areas on 01/22/25 at 08:19 AM, revealed the following areas of concern: Two bread bags were opened without a date. The freezers had items that were not labeled with an open date, which included: bread, rolls, spinach, french fries, onion rings, beef tips, and chicken tenders. Items in walk in cooler were not labeled with an open date, which included: a gallon of milk, a container of half and half, one container of grape jelly, a bottle of ketchup, a half of an onion, and a tray of blueberry muffins. During an interview on 01/22/25 at 08:40 AM, Dietary Manager U, confirmed the food items in the refrigerator and the undated, opened, bread was unacceptable. She reported she was unaware the items in the freezer were required to be labeled and dated when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 32 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to the lack of hand hygiene when incontinent care was provided to R3 and improper removal of personal protective equipment (PPE- gowns, face shields and/or eyeglasses/goggles, and gloves) after care provided to R3. The facility staff failed to wear proper PPE when emptying a catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid) drainage bag and when changing the leg bag (a small bag that collects urine from a Foley catheter and is worn on the leg during the day) to the gravity drainage bag. The facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of care for R3 and R134, regarding the cleaning of the nebulizer (device which changes liquid medication into a mist easily inhaled into the lungs) equipment after each use when medication was administered. This deficient practice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility census totaled 32 residents on three halls with a commons area where residents gathered for meals and activities. The facility had two medication carts and one nurse treatment cart that services the facility. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment by the failure to ensure a medication cart that contained prescription medications, narcotic medications in a locked box within the medication cart and over-the-counter (OTC - medications that do not require a prescription) and a nurse treatment cart that contained insulin (a medication used to treat diabetes [a disease when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin]), topical ointments and creams, remained locked when not in direct line of vision of the nurse, in an area where residents could access it. Findings included: - During an observation on 01/23/25 at 07:38 AM a medication cart was observed in the residents' hallway unlocked with keys hanging from the locking mechanism. A nurse treatment cart was next…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 32 residents with 12 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately revise three residents care plans. The facility failed to revise the care plan after Resident (R)19 who had increased exiting behaviors, and actual elopements (when a cognitively impaired resident leaves the facility without the knowledge or supervision of staff) from facility on 10/12/23 and 02/14/24. AdditionallyThe facility failed to update and place appropriate fall interventions for R3 and R15 who had multiple falls. This failure placed the residents at risk for uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - The Electronic Health Records (EHR) documented R19 had the following diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). The 012/23/24 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, indicating severely impaired cognition. R19 had no behaviors or depression. R19 required set up for showers…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 32 residents with 12 residents in the sample and four residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that remained free from accident hazards for four residents. The facility failed to identify, implement, and reevaluate fall prevention interventions to prevent falls for two residents. Resident (R) 15 had multiple falls with a lack of appropriate fall interventions. Additionally, the facility failed to implement new interventions to prevent R19 after she had an elopement (when a cognitively impaired resident leaves the facility without the knowledge or supervision of staff) from facility. The facility failed to put an effective smoking plan in place for R9. These deficient practices could potentially result in an injury. Findings included: - The Electronic Health Records (EHR) documented R9 had the following diagnoses depression, repeated falls, and hypotension (low blood pressure). The 11/11/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 32 residents with 12 residents sampled, including two residents reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to properly clean the nebulizer (a device for administering inhaled medications) after each medication was administered for Resident (R)3 and R134 in accordance with the standards of care This deficient practice had the potential to spread possible lung infections to the residents. During an observation on 01/22/25 at 09:34 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G removed the nebulizer equipment off f R3 after breathing treatment was completed. LN G placed the nebulizer equipment into a bag. LN G washed her hands, and she reported she would not rinse the nebulizer equipment after she had administered a breathing treatment as the nebulizer equipment was cleaned once a day on the night shift. During an observation on 01/22/25 at 02:35 PM, R134's nebulizer was intact with a clear liquid residue noted in chamber, that was placed in a bag. During an interview on 01/27/25 at 04:23 AM, LN K reported that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 32 residents with 12 residents sampled and five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that four residents remained free of unnecessary psychotropic (any class of medications that alters mood or thought) medications when the facility failed to ensure the physician responded in a timely manner to monthly medication regimen reviews (MRR) for Resident (R)15, 19 and R25 related to psychotropic medications and for R3 when the physician failed to provide appropriate rational when they declined a pharmacy recommended gradual dose reduction (GDR) for psychotropic medications. These deficient practices had the potential to lead to the residents receiving medications unnecessarily. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for Resident (R)15 included diagnoses of generalized dependence on wheelchair, dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS