No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Easton Health Care Center

515 Dawson, Easton, KS 66020 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 45 certified beds · (913) 773-5517 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (913) 773-5517 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2024Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0568, F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$22,431 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2024
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568, F0569)
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $22,431 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-16)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
550 Pope Ave · (913) 684-6138 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
550 Pope Ave
Grocery
21350 Springdale Rd
Park
31451 231st St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased25.5%17.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.1%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection8.9%2.9%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms73.6%6.5%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%4.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened25.6%16.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.5%23.2%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.1%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.0%4.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.4%22.6%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table44.2%18.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.9%1.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.641.801.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.752.131.80better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.3–17.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.131.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.67
RN hours/ resident / day
0.14
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.83
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.63
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.73
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 36.4 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.63 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.75 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-13)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-28)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 37 residents with three residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 remained free from abuse and mistreatment. On 04/26/24 at approximately 04:10 AM, R1, who had a history of trauma and Huntington's disease (a rare abnormal hereditary condition characterized by progressive mental deterioration; a disabling central nervous system movement disorder), approached Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M and CNA O and asked for some chocolate milk saying chocky milk. R1 attempted to retrieve the milk from the refrigerator located in the residents' dining area but CNA M and CNA O instructed R1 he was not able to get the milk from the refrigerator himself and told him staff would get him the chocolate milk if he asked for it correctly. R1 continued to pull on the refrigerator door and the two CNA staff stepped in between the refrigerator and R1 and physically obstructed R1 from opening the door, which resulted in a struggle between the staff and R1. During this physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 39 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent the development of an avoidable stage three (full-thickness pressure injury extending through the skin into the tissue below) pressure ulcer on Resident (R) 25's left heel.Findings included:- R25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of embolism (an obstruction in a blood vessel due to a blood clot or other foreign matter that gets stuck while traveling through the bloodstream) and thrombosis (a clot that develops within a blood vessel) of the vein, polyneuropathy, and pressure ulcer of the left heel stage three.R25's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 34 residents with three residents reviewed for falls and accidents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1's safety during a transfer when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M and Licensed Nurse (LN) G used a Hoyer lift (total body mechanical lift) to transfer R1 from her bed to her wheelchair. During the transfer, the lift tipped, and R1 hit the back of her head on a dresser. As a result, R1 sustained a laceration to the back of her head that required staples and sutures to close. This deficient practice also placed R1 at risk for pain and other avoidable injuries. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of generalized muscle weakness, Alzheimer's Disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), dependence on wheelchair, unspecified lack of coordination,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organism which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) were used for Resident (R) 4, who had a suprapubic catheter (urinary bladder catheter inserted through the abdomen into the bladder), failed to handle and transport soiled linen in a safe and sanitary manner, failed to ensure R4's catheter bag did not drag on the floor while in his wheelchair and bed. The facility failed to ensure staff performed appropriate glove changing and hand hygiene while performing personal care for R4 and failed to disinfect a mattress after changing soiled linens.Findings included:- The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity and respect for one resident, Resident (R) 4, when staff did not close the door to his room before providing personal cares.Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R4 documented diagnoses of retention of urine (the inability to completely empty the bladder), urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in any part of the urinary system), and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH- non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate which can lead to interference with urine flow).R4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score (BIMS) of 15, which indicated intact cognition. R4 was dependent upon staff assistance for toileting hygiene, lower body dressing, and substantial assistance with personal hygiene. R4 further required partial staff assistance with mobility. The MDS documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 39 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure R4's care plan had been revised to include enhanced barrier precautions (EBP- infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms, which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact cares) that needed to be worn during staff cares of his supra pubic catheter (urinary bladder catheter inserted through the abdomen into the bladder).Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R4 documented diagnoses of retention of urine (the inability to completely empty the bladder), urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in any part of the urinary system), and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH -non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate which can lead to interference with urine flow).R4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score (BIMS) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent two superficial open areas on Resident (R) 4's scrotum (the sac of skin and muscle located outside the lower body that holds and protects the testicles).Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R4 documented diagnoses of chronic osteomyelitis (local or generalized infection of the bone and bone marrow), venous insufficiency (slow and progressive circulation disorder causing narrowing, blockage, or spasms in a blood vessel), and diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin was made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin) type two.R4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R4 had intact cognition. R4 was dependent upon staff assistance for toileting hygiene, lower body dressing, and substantial assistance with personal hygiene. R4 further required partial staff assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services consistent with the standard of care for one resident, Resident (R) 4, reviewed for urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) or urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in any part of the urinary system).Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R4 documented diagnoses of retention of urine (the inability to completely empty the bladder), UTI, and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH- non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate which can lead to interference with urine flow).R4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R4 had intact cognition. R4 was dependent upon staff assistance for toileting hygiene, lower body dressing, and substantial assistance with personal hygiene. R4 further required partial staff assistance with mobility. The MDS documented R4 had a urinary catheter and had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-16 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 33 residents and 23 active resident trust fund accounts. The sample included five residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to distribute quarterly statements to all residents that held trust fund accounts in the facility. This placed the residents at risk for uninformed decisions regarding their trust fund and misappropriation. Findings included: - Review of the Trial Balance as of 08/22/24 revealed 23 total accounts with a balance of $16,931.18. The Trial Balance documented Resident (R) 2 had a current trust fund balance of $681.35. On 08/23/24 at 03:17 PM, R2's representative and responsible financial party stated he had not received a quarterly stated regarding R2's trust account at all this year. He stated that he had called and attempted to talk with the new person in charge of the trust accounts but had not been able to get ahold of anyone. On 08/26/24 at 02:40 PM Administrative Staff B confirmed she has never sent out any quarterly statements for any of the trust accounts at the facility. She stated she had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 33 residents which included 23 residents with active trust accounts, held by the facility. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 1 with an accurate accounting of her personal funds, when the facility overcharged R1's personal funds account by $347.89 . This placed R1 at risk for impaired autonomy and misappropriation. Findings included: - Review of R1's trust transactions as listed on the Resident Statement Landscape dated 09/01/23 to 08/26/24 documented the following duplicate charges and one charge with no receipt for R1. The withdrawals on 01/04/24 for the following amounts had handwritten receipts with R1 and Administrative Staff B's signatures for the following amounts: $20.00, $30.00, $117.89, $25.00, $30.00, and $25.00. The withdrawal on 01/31/24 for $25.00 had no receipt documented for that withdrawal. The withdrawals on 08/06/24 for the following amounts have a handwritten receipt dated from 2023 stapled to withdrawal receipts for the following amounts with receipt numbers: W000101 $117.89,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 33 residents and 23 active resident trust fund accounts. The sample included five residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the conveyance of personal funds within 30 days of discharge and/or death for Resident (R) 3, R4, and R5. This placed the residents at risk for impaired rights and misappropriation. Findings included: - Review of the Trial Balance as of [DATE] revealed 23 total accounts with a balance of 16, 931.18. The Trial Balance documented R3 had a current trust fund balance of $233.39. R3's Electronic Medical record (EMR) recorded R3 discharged from the facility on [DATE]. The Trial Balance documented R4 had a current trust fund balance of $178.95. R4's EMR recorded R4 discharged from the facility on [DATE]. The Trial Balance documented R5 had a current trust fund balance of $20.56. R5's EMR recorded he died in the facility on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 02:40 PM Administrative Staff B stated that she was not entirely certain what she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-28 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents and three Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) reviewed for yearly performance evaluations. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure three CNA staff had the required yearly performance evaluations completed. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate care. Findings included: - A review of the facility's performance evaluation records revealed the following: CNA O, hired 06/18/21, no yearly performance evaluations were provided upon request. CNA P had a hire date of 09/05/22. The facility could not provide any evidence that a yearly evaluation had been performed in 2023. The facility provided an evaluation dated 02/26/24 ( two days after the start of the survey). CNA Q was hired on 08/04/20. The facility provided a performance evaluation dated 02/27/24. CNA Q had no prior performance evaluations. On 02/28/24 at 11:45 AM Administrative Nurse D stated she had learned a lot during the survey and was aware that staff performance evaluations had not been completed as they should have been.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information to the federal regulatory agency through Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ), when the facility failed to submit staffing hour data for all nursing personnel by the required deadline. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for impaired care due to unidentified and ongoing staffing issues. Findings included: - The PBJ report provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 Quarter 1 documented the facility triggered for one-star staffing and excessively low weekend staffing. Per the PBJ, the facility failed to have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours a day on 10/01/22, 10/02/22, 10/29/22, 11/24/22, and 12/26/22. The PBJ report provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 Quarter 2 the facility triggered for one-star staffing and excessively low weekend staffing. Per the PBJ, the facility failed to have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement the core elements of antibiotic stewardship to ensure an effective infection prevention and control program including antibiotic stewardship for the residents of the facility. Findings included: - Review of the Infection Control Log for tracking and trending infections from February 2023 through January 2024, lacked evidence of organism identifications, duration of antibiotic prescribed, and the infections treated. The facility was unable to provide evidence of tracking upon request. On 02/28/2 at 10:41 AM, Administrative Nurse E, the facility Infection Preventionist, stated she reviewed the results of any culture and sensitivities but did not track the results. Administrative Nurse E stated she or the charge nurse completed the Mcgeer's and Lobe's criteria after a urine analysis was obtained. The facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program last reviewed in November 2023 documented it was the policy of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-28 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents and three Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) reviewed for in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the four CNA staff reviewed had the required 12 hours of in-service education including the required topics per year. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate care. Findings included: - A review of the facility's in-service records revealed the following: CNA O hired on 06/18/21 had documentation that showed in-services in the past 12 months but lacked any recorded/documented hours of in-service. CNA P hired 09/05/22, had documentation that showed in-services in the past 12 months but lacked any recorded/documented hours of the in-service. CNA Q hired 08/04/20 had documentation that showed in-services the past 12 months but lacked recorded/documented hours. The facility provided the form Annual In-Service Calendar which listed the required in-services for each month and the duration of each training which totaled 42.5 hours annually. On 02/28/24 at 09:00 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-28 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for immunization status. Based on record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to obtain consent or declinations for influenza (highly contagious viral infection that attacks the lungs, nose, and throat and can be deadly in high-risk groups) vaccination for Resident (R) 22 and R35. The facility also failed to offer or obtain declinations for pneumococcal (type of bacterial infection) vaccination consents, declinations, or administration information for R22, R35, R17, and R32. This placed the residents at increased risk for influenza, pneumonia, and related complications. Findings included: - R22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R22's clinical record lacked documentation the influenza vaccine or pneumococcal vaccine was offered or declined and lacked documentation of a historical administration. Upon request for R22's declination or administration of influenza vaccine or pneumococcal vaccine, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide written notice of transfer with the required information to Resident (R) 139 and/or to their legal representative in a practicable amount of time. The facility also failed to send a notification to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of the facility's transfers and discharges. This deficient practice had the risk of miscommunication between the facility and the residents and possible missed opportunities for healthcare service for these residents. Findings included: - R139's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice when Resident (R) 139 was hospitalized . This deficient practice placed R139 at risk of uninformed choices. Findings included: - R139's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), and falls. A review of R139's EMR revealed she was admitted on [DATE]. R139's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 01/21/24 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 which indicated moderately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one resident reviewed for a baseline care plan. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop a person-centered baseline care plan to include pressure relieving measures to prevent pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) for Resident (R) 139. This deficient practice placed R139 at risk of impaired care related to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R139's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 30's comprehensive care plan was updated to reflect what services and/or equipment were provided by the hospice within the required seven days after completion og the comprehensive assessment. The facility also failed to update R22's Care Plan to address catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid) use and care. This placed these residents at risk of impaired care due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R30 documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion) with mood disturbance. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 01/16/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents. with two residents reviewed for treatment/services to prevent/heal pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure pressure reducing measures were in place for Resident (R) 139 who developed deep tissue injuries on her bilateral heels. This deficient practice placed R139 at risk of development of pressure ulcers, and of wound worsening. Findings included: - R139's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning), anxiety (mental or emotional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three residents reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM- the full movement potential of a joint, usually its range of flexion and extension). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide ROM to help maintain and prevent a potential decrease in ROM/mobility for Resident (R) 20. This deficient practice placed R20 at risk of loss of ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) and worsening or development of contractures (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle). Findings included: - R20's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of contracture of right and left knees, dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness) and anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two residents sampled for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 5's fall investigation included a root cause analysis of the fall and failed to ensure that an appropriate intervention was implemented to prevent further falls. These deficient practices placed this resident at risk for additional falls and or injuries. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R5 documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion), muscle weakness, and a history of repeated falls with fractures of the pelvis (the lower section of bones that connect to the trunk and the legs). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 08/15/23 documented R5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four which indicated severely impaired cognition. R5 required extensive assistance from one staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). R5 had impairment on both sides of her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one resident reviewed for trauma-informed care (treatment or care directed to prevent re-experiencing or reducing the effects of traumatic events). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to identify trauma-based triggers related to Resident (R) 20's posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a mental disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress) and failed to implement individualized interventions to prevent re-traumatization. These deficient practices placed R20 at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being and ineffective treatment. Findings included: - R20's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of PTSD, contracture (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle) of right and left knees, dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two residents sampled for hospice services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to establish a communication process, including how the communication will be documented between the facility and the hospice provider for Resident (R) 32. The facility failed to ensure that R32's written plan of care included both the most recent hospice plan of care and a description of the services furnished by both the facility and hospice. This placed R32 at risk of decline and/or from maintaining the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R30 documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion) with mood disturbance. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 37 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control standards were followed related to hand hygiene during peri-care and the disinfecting of shared equipment. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for complications related to infectious diseases. Findings included: - On 02/22/24 at 09:33 AM Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M and CNA N donned gloves and then transferred Resident (R) 9 into bed with the assistance of a Hoyer lift (total body mechanical lift). CNA M and CNA N removed the lift sling from under R9. CNA M removed R9's slacks, then untaped R9's incontinence brief. CNA M did not change her gloves but proceeded to provide peri-care to R9's peri area. CNA M rolled R9 onto her left side and removed the soiled brief from underneath R9. CNA M provided peri care to R9's rectal area, buttocks, and coccyx (area at the base of the spine) area. Wearing the same soiled gloves, CNA M opened the bedside drawer, removed skin protective cream from the drawer, and applied the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-11-29 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours, seven days a week and failed to designate a full time RN as Director of Nursing to oversee the care provided to the residents. This placed the resident at risk for decreased quality of care. Findings included: - Review of the daily nurse staffing from 11/02/23 through 11/29/23 provided by the facility revealed the following dates which lacked evidence of RN coverage for eight consecutive hours: 11/03/23 - Friday 11/04/23 - Saturday 11/14/23 - Tuesday 11/15/23 - Wednesday 11/18/23 - Saturday 11/21/23 - Tuesday 11/28/23 - Tuesday On 11/29/23 Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated she was aware of two full time nurses and perhaps one as needed (PRN) RN that worked at the building. LN G revealed that there was no Director of Nursing for the facility. On 11/29/23 at 03:16 PM Administrative Nurse E stated she only had two RNs that worked at the facility. There was a third RN, but that RN only worked one day and nothing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 33 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to evaluate causative factors in order to identify and implement interventions to prevent falls for Resident (R)1, who had multiple falls. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for continued falls and fall related injury. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), under the Diagnosis tab recorded diagnoses of fractured right wrist, muscle weakness, Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) disorder, and unspecified psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality perception). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven which indicated in moderately impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-09-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 38 residents. The facility had one kitchen. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store frozen foods under sanitary conditions in the facility kitchen. This deficient practice placed the 38 residents of the facility at risk to receive foods with contamination and/or an unpleasant taste related to freezer burn. Findings included: - On 08/31/22 at 08:00 AM, observation in the facility's kitchen revealed the Leftover freezer contained three unsealed bags of French fries and one unsealed bag of meat patties. On 09/01/22 at 12:10 PM, observation revealed two unsealed bags of French fries and one unsealed bag of burger patties. On 09/01/22 at 12:10 PM, Dietary Staff (DS) BB verified staff were to ensure frozen foods were re-sealed after using a portion of the food from the bags. The facility's Food Safety Requirements policy, dated 01/2022, documented the staff would store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The policy stated staff would store foods in tightly covered containers. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 38 residents and no Covid (highly contagious, potentially life threatening respiratory virus) residents. The sample included 13 residents with two residents on quarantine for Covid. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide a sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections when staff hung a used gown from a quarantined resident's room on an isolation cart in the hall and cleaned a quarantined resident's room without changing gloves between dirty and clean tasks. The facility further failed to maintain an ongoing infection surveillance program. This placed the 38 residents who resided in the facility at increased risk for infection. Findings included: - On 8/30/22 at 10:00 AM, observation revealed Licensed Nurse (LN) H hung a used isolation gown on an isolation cart outside a quarantine resident's room. LN H verified it was used and stated it should not be there. LN H applied gloves and discarded the gown in the trash can outside the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to maintain an ongoing infection surveillance program which included antibiotic stewardship. This placed the 38 residents who resided in the facility at increased risk for receiving an infection, and/or negative effects of antibiotic use. Findings included: - The Infection Tracking Binder lacked documentation regarding monitoring and tracking of residents' infections or antibiotic uses, appropriateness or organisms being treated for April, May, June, July and August 2022. On 09/07/22 at 10:40 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified she had not been monitoring or tracking infections. She stated she was new to the Infection Preventionist position, went to a workshop and would be using some ideas she picked up there to start monitoring and tracking. The facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program Policy, revised on 08/02/22, documented the program would include antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. The monitoring should include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-07 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 38 residents, with three reviewed for Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Beneficiary Liability notices. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN), CMS form 10055, which contained the estimated cost to continue services for skilled services, to the resident or their representative for the three reviewed residents, Resident (R) 27, 30, and 20. This placed the residents at risk for uninformed decisions regarding skilled services. Findings included: - The facility lacked documentation staff provided R27 (or their representative) the ABN form 10055 when the resident's skilled services ended 04/03/22. The facility provided a facility generated form which lacked a cost estimate for continued services. The facility lacked documentation staff provided R30 or their representative) the ABN form 10055 when the resident's skilled services ended 05/16/22. The facility provided a facility generated form which lacked a cost estimate for continued services. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 13 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to care plan Resident (R) 35's fluid restriction. This deficient practice placed R35 at risk for fluid overload (too much fluid in your body). Findings included: - R35's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 07/26/22, documented diagnoses of acute kidney failure (kidneys suddenly become unable to filter waste products from your blood), acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (condition that results in the inability to effectively exchange carbon dioxide and oxygen), anxiety disorder (mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities), hypertension (high blood pressure), lymphedema (swelling in an arm or leg caused by a lymphatic system blockage), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to invite two sampled residents', Resident (R) 5 and R34, (or their representative) to their quarterly care plan conferences and failed to update R8's care plan with a section regarding her facial skin condition. This placed R5 and R34 at risk for not having the right to participate in choosing treatment and options for their care and placed R8 at risk for unmet and/or uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented the R5 had diagnoses of anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), major depressive disorder (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness and hopelessness), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), and impulse disorder(condition in which a person has trouble controlling emotions or behaviors). R5's Quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-07 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 13 residents with one reviewed for foot care. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services for Resident (R) 14's feet and or toenails. This deficient practice placed R14 at risk for complication and pain related to his feet. Findings included: - R14's diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure), cerebrovascular disease (causes problems with reasoning, planning, judgment, memory and other thought processes), congestive heart failure (heart muscle does not pump blood as well as it should), and atrial fibrillation (irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented severely impaired cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six. The MDS documented R14 required supervision for eating and extensive assistance of one staff for all other activities of daily living (ADLs).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 13 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to monitor Resident (R) 35's fluid restriction. This deficient practice placed R35 at risk for fluid overload (too much fluid in your body) and hospitalization for treatment. Findings included: - R35's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 07/26/22, documented diagnoses of acute kidney failure (kidneys suddenly become unable to filter waste products from your blood), acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (condition that results in the inability to effectively exchange carbon dioxide and oxygen), anxiety disorder (mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities), hypertension (high blood pressure), lymphedema (swelling in an arm or leg caused by a lymphatic system blockage), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (irregular,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 38 residents. The sample included 13 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ackowledge and follow up on the Consultant Pharmacist's (CP) medication recommendations and failed to ensrue the CP idenitfied and reported missing behavior documentation for psychotropic (medications which alters mood and thought) medications. This placed R5 at risk for ineffective medication regimen and unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings included: - Resident (R) 5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented she had diagnoses of hypertension (elevated blood pressure), arthritis (inflammation of a joint characterized by pain, swelling, heat, redness and limitation of movement) of left hand, heart disease, hypokalemia (low level of potassium in the blood) and hypothyroidism (condition characterized by decreased activity of the thyroid gland). R5's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated 06/18/22, documented R5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 13 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to consistent behavior monitoring for Resident (R) 5 who received several psychotropic medications ( medications which alters mood or thought) including an antipsychotic (class of psychotropic medication primarily used to manage psychosis, principally in schizophrenia but also in a range of other psychotic disorders). This placed the resident at risk for unnecessary psychotropic medication use and related side effects. Findings included: - R5's Electronic Medical Record (ER) documented she had diagnoses of hypertension (elevated blood pressure), arthritis (inflammation of a joint characterized by pain, swelling, heat, redness and limitation of movement) of left hand, heart disease, hypothermia (low level of potassium in the blood) and hypothyroidism (condition characterized by decreased activity of the thyroid gland). R5's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated 06/18/22, documented R5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2026-01-13 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information through the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) as required.Findings included: - The PBJ report provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for Fiscal Year (YR) 2025 Quarter (Q) 1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 indicated excessively low weekend staffing.Review of the facility's Nursing Staff scheduled for the above quarters revealed adequate staffing on duty was provided.On 01/12/26 at 02:15 PM, Administrative Staff A stated the information for the PBJ was pulled in the corporate office from the time clock. Administrative Staff A stated they have not been short on the weekends and do not use agency. The Director of Nursing and herself do the schedule. They have gone through several different payroll programs so that may be what has caused this issue. The facility does weekend [NAME] staffing which means staff who work both Saturday…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-02-28 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to post the previous state inspection information in a location accessible to residents and visitors. Findings included: - On 02/27/24 at 12:50 PM review of the state agency results book that was available in the living room area lacked the Statement of Deficiencies which included citations from a complaint survey conducted on 11/29/23. On 02/27/24 at 03:03 PM Administrative Staff A stated it was his responsibility to ensure the survey result book was kept up to date with the most current survey results. The facility was unable to provide a policy related to past survey results availability. The facility failed to post state inspection results from a recent complaint survey on 11/29/23 for residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$22,431 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $9,214 — penalty dated 2024-07-16
  • $13,217 — penalty dated 2024-05-01
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-06 for 52 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$255K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 5%Medicare 8%Other / private 86%

This home reported $255K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$288per resident / day
operating cost
$8,745per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$260per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175411. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next