Lakepoint El Dorado, LLC
1313 S High Street, El Dorado, KS 67042 · For profit - Partnership · 75 certified beds · (316) 320-4140 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0610) — most recent Jul 2024
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (25) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $24,852 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-24)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 29.4% | 17.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.4% | 4.9% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 1.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.0% | 2.9% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.9% | 6.5% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 4.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 32.5% | 16.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.4% | 23.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.9% | 4.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 30.8% | 22.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.2% | 18.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.9% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.8% | 73.8% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.7% | 22.4% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.6% | 11.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.60 | 1.80 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.94 | 2.13 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 88 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 44.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.1%CMS range 40.4–57.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 7.8–15.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 44.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 51.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 46.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 3.0–11.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.82 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 61.8 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.02 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.23 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
25 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 52 residents, with three residents sampled for abuse. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent the sexual abuse of cognitively impaired Resident (R) 3, who lacked the ability to consent. On 07/09/24 at approximately 03:30 PM to 04:00 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) N observed cognitively intact R2, who had a history of touching R3, with his hand inside R3's pant leg to her groin area. R3 had severe cognitive impairment and inability to consent, placing her in immediate jeopardy, based on a reasonable person concept, and at risk for trauma and a negative psychosocial impact. Finding included: - The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], assessed R2 with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. R2 had no behaviors or limits in his range of motion and used a wheelchair for mobility which he could move independently. The Care Plan initiated on 04/30/24 for R2 revealed he required a wheelchair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 52 residents, with three residents sampled for abuse. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to protect cognitively impaired Resident (R) 3, who lacked the ability to consent, from sexual abuse. On 07/09/24 at approximately 03:30 PM to 04:00 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) N observed cognitively intact R2, who had a history of touching R3, with his hand inside R3's pant leg to her groin area. R3 had severe cognitive impairment and inability to consent, placing her in immediate jeopardy, based on a reasonable person concept, and at risk for trauma and a negative psychosocial impact. Finding included: - The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], assessed R2 with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. R2 had no behaviors or limits in his range of motion and used a wheelchair for mobility which he could move independently. The Care Plan initiated on 04/30/24 for R2 revealed he required a wheelchair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2021-08-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 51 residents with 16 selected for review, which included four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate pressure relieving interventions were in place for one resident (R)13, who had a worsening pressure ulcer on her lateral (side) shin area. In addition, the facility failed to provide sanitary pressure ulcer dressing changes for three residents, R13, R49 and R3, also reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings Included: Review of R13's Physician Order Sheet, dated 08/12/21, revealed diagnoses of thoracic (mid spine) and lumbar vertebra (lower spine) fracture, and peripheral autonomic neuropathy (nerve pain in the arms and legs.) The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident had normal cognitive function, required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and transfer, no impairment in range of motion in her upper or lower extremities, was at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-18 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R11 documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin) type 2, dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), chronic respiratory failure (occurs when the lungs are unable to exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide in the blood properly) with hypoxia (inadequate supply of oxygen), hypertension (high blood pressure), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R11 had intact cognition and required substantial assistance for toileting,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-18 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R11 documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin) type 2, dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), chronic respiratory failure (occurs when the lungs are unable to exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide in the blood properly) with hypoxia (inadequate supply of oxygen), hypertension (high blood pressure), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R11 had intact cognition and required substantial assistance for toileting,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 55 residents. The sample included 15 residents with five reviewed for drug regimen. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported Resident (R)1 and R18's blood pressure medication was administered outside the physician-ordered parameters and R20 and R31s' use of antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) with an unapproved diagnosis. This placed the residents at risk for inappropriate use of medication and related complications. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), muscle weakness, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), history of falling, dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 55 residents. The sample included 15 residents and 25 medication administrations observed. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than 5 percent (%). This placed the residents in the facility who received medications at risk for physical decline and other related complications. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R18 documented diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), dementia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 55 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medications and biologicals were stored and monitored appropriately in one of two medication rooms. This placed the affected residents at risk of ineffective medication. Findings included: - On 12/18/24 at 08:29 AM, the East medication room had two refrigerators that lacked evidence the temperatures were assessed and recorded for nine out of 17 days in December 2024. Further observation revealed one of the refrigerators had 24 Activa yogurts with expiration dates of September 2024 through November 2024. On 12/18/24 at 08:29 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) J verified the lack of temperature documentation. LN J stated the refrigerator temperatures were taken by the medication aides, but any nursing staff could take the temperatures. LN J also verified the expiration date on the yogurts and disposed of them. On 12/18/24 at 11:37 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified that the medication room refrigerator temperature should be recorded…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 55 residents. The sample included 15 residents reviewed for care plans. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff developed and implemented a comprehensive care plan for Resident (R) 29 that included care and interventions for dialysis (a procedure where impurities or wastes are removed from the blood). The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for R36 to address diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin) and insulin use. This placed R29 and R36 at risk of impaired care due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R29's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of end-stage renal disease (ESRD - a terminal disease of the kidneys), dependence on renal dialysis, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure). R29's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 55 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow up with the physician for direction when one resident, Resident (R) 10 became ill with a productive cough and coarse lung sounds. This placed R10 at risk for physical decline and complications due to delayed physician involvement. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R10 documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), Sjogren's syndrome (an immune system illness that mainly causes dry eyes and dry mouth), and epilepsy (epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R10 had intact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 55 residents. The sample included 15 residents with two residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 42's low air loss mattress (a mattress designed to prevent and treat pressure wounds) was functioning which resulted in an avoidable fall. The facility failed to ensure R50 was assessed for the safe use of a recliner or the need for updated toileting interventions after sustaining falls to prevent further falls. This placed R42 and R50 at risk for preventable falls and possible injuries. Findings included: - R42's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 55 residents. The sample included 15 residents with Resident (R) 29 reviewed for dialysis (a procedure where impurities or wastes are removed from the blood), nutrition, and hydration. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure R29's physician-ordered fluid restriction was followed, monitored, and documented. This placed R29 at risk of fluid overload and related complications. Findings included: - R29's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of end-stage renal disease (ESRD - a terminal disease of the kidneys), dependence on renal dialysis, diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure). R29's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. R29 had impairment to both lower extremities and required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 55 residents. The sample included 15 residents with one resident reviewed for trauma-informed care (treatment or care directed to prevent re-experiencing or reducing the effects of traumatic events). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to identify trauma-based triggers related to Resident (R) 2's post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - mental disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress) and failed to implement individualized interventions to prevent re-traumatization. These deficient practices placed R2 at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being and ineffective treatment. Findings included: - R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnosis of cerebrovascular accident (CVA - stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), hemiplegia and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 12 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 55 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to hold blood pressure medications per the physician-ordered parameters for two residents, Resident (R) 18 and R1. This placed the resident at risk for physical decline and other related complications. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R18 documented diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - R31's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) with behavioral disturbances, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), bipolar disorder (a major mental illness that causes people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), and hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure) R31's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented she had both short and long-term memory problems. R31 had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision-making. R31 had continuous behaviors of inattention and disorganized thinking. R31 had delusions (untrue persistent beliefs or perceptions held by a person although evidence shows it was untrue). R31 had impairment on both sides of her lower extremities. R31 required partial to substantial assistance from staff for her functional abilities and activities of daily living (ADLs). R31 received antipsychotics (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - R42's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), spinal stenosis (degenerative condition of the spine that could cause weakness and loss of use of extremities), and repeated falls. R42's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented short- and long-term memory problems. R42 had severely impaired decision-making skills and showed signs and symptoms of delirium (sudden severe confusion, disorientation, and restlessness). R42 was dependent on staff for all daily functional abilities and activities of daily living (ADLs). R42 had a history of falls and had one fall without injury since the prior assessment. R42 was on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-16 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with six reviewed for side rails. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess Resident (R)14, R 17, R1, R12, R21 and R20s' side rails for safe use. This deficient practice placed the six residents at risk for entrapment or injury. Findings included: - R14's diagnoses included dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), cerebral vascular disease (sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body). R14's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R14 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The assessment revealed R14 required extensive staff assistance for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, and toilet use. The MDS lacked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 14 residents of which five were reviewed for immunization status. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to offer and provide the residents and/or their representative the current years Influenza Vaccine Information Statement (VIS-informed sheets produced by the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] that explained both the benefits and risk of vaccine to vaccine recipients for Resident (R)4, R12, R17, R20 and R25. This placed the affected residents at increased risk for illness and infection. Findings included: - R4's clinical record lacked evidence the current year Influenza Vaccine Information Statement form was provided to the resident and/or resident's representative, or an informed refusal was obtained. R12's clinical record lacked evidence the current year Influenza Vaccine Information Statement form was provided to the resident and/or resident's representative or an informed refusal was obtained. R17's clinical record lacked evidence the current year Influenza Vaccine Information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the failed to review and revise Resident (R) 10's plan of care with resident-centered interventions to prevent falls, which placed the R10 at risk of further falls and injury. Findings included: - R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of acute respiratory distress, agoraphobia (extreme fear of entering crowded places, leaving one's home, or being in places from which escape is difficult) with panic disorder, anemia (condition without enough healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues) , anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) disorder, cachexia (weakness and wasting of body due to severe chronic illness), chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 32 and the sample included 14 residents, with seven reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to identify and implement interventions to prevent falls for Resident (R)10 and failed to apply antiroll back devices to R20's wheelchair to prevent further falls, which placed the residents at risk for ongoing falls and injuries. Findings included: - R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of acute respiratory distress, agoraphobia (extreme fear of entering crowded places, leaving one's home, or being in places from which escape is difficult) with panic disorder, anemia (condition without enough healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues) , anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) disorder, cachexia (weakness and wasting of body due to severe chronic illness), chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - progressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist identified and reported to the Director of Nursing, facility medical director, and physician, the lack of a 14 day stop date for Resident (R)26's as needed (PRN) psychotropic (a medication that affects mood and/or thought) or rationale for use. This placed the resident at risk for inappropriate use of a psychotropic medication with side effects. Findings included: - R26's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of anxiety (mental, uncertainty and irrational fear), and depression (mood disorder characterized by persistent sadness). R26's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five, indicating severely impaired cognition. R26 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 17 residents, with six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a 14- day stop date for Resident (R) 26 and R10 who received as needed (PRN) psychotropic (medication that affects mood and/or thoughts) medication that lacked a rationale for continued use. This placed the affected residents at risk for unintended affects related to psychotropic drug medications. Findings included: - R26's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of anxiety (mental, uncertainty and irrational fear), and depression (mood disorder characterized by persistent sadness). R26's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five, indicating severely impaired cognition. R26 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use, and locomotion on and off the unit and hygiene. The MDS documented R26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-17 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 51 residents with 16 selected for review. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the development of a base line care plan for one selected resident (R)55, within 48 hours of admission and to include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident. Findings included: - Review of R55's Transfer Sheet, from acute care, dated [DATE], revealed diagnoses included congestive heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid) chronic kidney disease, profound bradycardia (low heart beat) and mitral regurgitation (backflow of blood into the heart chambers). The resident expired on [DATE] before completion of the Minimum Data Set (MDS). (due on [DATE]) The resident's medical record lacked a baseline care plan as required, within the first 48 hours following admission to the facility. A Physician's Order, dated [DATE], instructed staff to obtain hospice services for the resident. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 51 residents with 16 selected for review. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for one resident (R)13, who developed stage three pressure ulcer to her coccyx and stage four pressure ulcer to her left shin, after determining the heel lift device caused the pressure injury to her shins. Findings Included: Review of R13's Physician Order Sheet, dated 08/12/21, revealed diagnoses of thoracic (mid spine) and lumbar vertebra (lower spine) fracture, and peripheral autonomic neuropathy (nerve pain in the arms and legs.) The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident had normal cognitive function, required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and transfer, no impairment in range of motion in her upper or lower extremities, was at risk for pressure ulcer development and with no current pressure ulcers. This MDS lacked documentation of pressure relieving devices used for the bed or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - The signed Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 07/01/21, documented R21 had the following diagnoses: cerebral infarction (also known as a stroke) refers to damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area), subdural hematoma (collection of blood on the surface of the brain), and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) in other diseases. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R21's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. She required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. A Falls Care Area Assessment, dated 09/18/20, documented R21 had a change due to decline in cognitive functioning, communication, and a decline in her ability to perform activities of daily living. A fall in August resulted in a subdural hematoma and she required hospitalization. Her speech was unclear at times. She sometimes has difficulty making…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$24,852 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $13,456 — penalty dated 2024-07-24
- $11,396 — penalty dated 2024-01-30
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HARRISON, WARNER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 97% | since 03/15/2023 |
| MANHATTAN RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/15/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $261K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175124. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.