No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Enterprise Estates Nuring Center

602 Crestview Drive, Enterprise, KS 67441 · Non profit - Other · 40 certified beds · (785) 263-8278 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (785) 263-8278 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0609) — most recent Nov 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
511 NE 10th St · (785) 263-4131 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
105 NW 3rd St · (785) 263-2229 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1900 N Buckeye Ave · (785) 263-2285 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.9%17.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.2%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder4.0%1.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%6.5%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%4.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.3%16.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication47.9%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.6%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.2%4.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.8%22.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table38.0%18.1%17.1%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.371.801.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days6.052.131.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.26hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 6.3–16.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.851.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.50
RN hours/ resident / day
0.91
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.93
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.34
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.33
RN hoursweekends
51.5%
Total nursing turnover
80.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 27.8 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.34 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.93 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.38 on weekdays — 3% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-17)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-17)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-11-17 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 27 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure the required annual performance reviews were completed for the three members reviewed. Findings included: - A review of the facility nurse and nurse aide performance evaluations revealed that Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R was hired on 03/21/24, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M was hired on 06/21/23, and CNA N was hired on 07/06/21. Randomly selected employees, who had been employed for over a year, lacked an annual review.On 09/23/25 at 11:06 AM, Administrative Staff B reported the facility had an annual review from 2023, but not for 2024. Administrative Staff B stated the facility had new administrative staff and had not performed an annual review.The facility's undated Employee Annual Performance Evaluation form included knowledge, skillset, judgement, quality of work, productivity and dependability, communication, initiative, and resident/family focus, which scored the employee for a percentage wage increase.Upon request, the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-11-17 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 27 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assurance Assessment and Assurance committee (QA&A) that met quarterly and had the required membership in attendance.Findings included:- The facility provided QA&A committee attendance rosters for 01/23/25, 02/07/25, 07/02/25, and 09/11/25. Upon review of the rosters, the Medical Director signed in attendance on 02/07/25 and 09/11/25. On 09/24/25 at 02:27 PM, Administrative Staff A reported she had begun employment with the facility in July 2025 and could find limited information from the previous administrator's QA&A process. Administrative Staff A stated she had not had training related to the QA&A process but had a meeting involving the Medical Director on 09/11/25.The facility's Quality Assurance policy, dated 07/20/16, documented that the Quality Assurance Team would meet on a monthly and quarterly basis to ensure quality care and compliance with regulations. The facility shall maintain a quality assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 27 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms, which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) for Resident (R) 4 and R21 urinary catheter care (tube placed in the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag). The facility also failed to have a structured Infection Control program. Finding included: - R4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms (BPH- non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate which can lead to interference with urine flow, urinary frequency, and urinary tract infections), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), overactive bladder, need for assistance with personal care, retention of urine, muscle weakness, acute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 27 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five residents sampled for unnecessary medication. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 8 obtain an approved diagnosis for the use of Risperidone (an antipsychotic-class of medications used to treat major mental conditions which cause a break from reality) for dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) or the physician's rationale for why this specific drug was necessary to treat the condition.Findings included:- R8's Electronic Medical Record documented diagnoses of Lewy body dementia (type of progressive brain disorder that leads to a decline in thinking, reasoning, and independent function), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), recurrent major depressive disorder, and impulse disorder (sudden, forceful, irresistible urges to do something).R8's Quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 27 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) of Resident (R) 30's facility-initiated discharge to the hospital. Findings included: - R30's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of atherosclerotic health disease (a buildup of fats, cholesterol/plaque in the walls of the arteries obstructing blood flow), cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), stage 3 renal failure (moderated damage to the kidneys and reduced kidney function), and hypocalcemia (abnormally low level of calcium in the blood).R30's scheduled 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R30 was cognitively intact. The MDS recorded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 27 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise and update the care plan with Enhanced Barrier Precautions for Resident (R) 4 and R21 urinary catheters (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag). The facility also failed to revise and update R3's falls care plan.Findings included: - R4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms (BPH- non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate which can lead to interference with urine flow, urinary frequency, and urinary tract infections), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), overactive bladder, need for assistance with personal care, retention of urine, muscle weakness, acute kidney failure, and generalized anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 27 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide physician-ordered interventions to treat or prevent pressure wounds for Resident (R) 8 when staff failed to apply a pressure relief air overlay device on R8's bed. Findings included:- R8's Electronic Medical Record documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), localized edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), and pressure-induced deep tissue damage of the left heel.R8's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 27 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one reviewed for side rails. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess the actual rail being used to assure safety for Resident (R) 7. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R7's of hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), transient ischemic attack (TIA- temporary episode of inadequate blood supply to the brain), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), and chronic pain.R7's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] recorded the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, indicating mild cognitive impairment. The MDS documented R7 required substantial assistance with mobility and rolling left to right. The MDS lacked documentation the resident had siderails. R7's medical record lacked a Side Rail Assessment and safe use for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 27 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility's nursing staff failed to follow physician orders to obtain adequate blood samples for Resident (R) 6 's laboratory testing and further failed to obtain physician involvement for direction related to continued Coumadin (anticoagulant-blood thinning drug) and Lovenox (anticoagulant-blood thinning drug) administration without the required monitoring. Findings included:- R6's Electronic Medical Record documented diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting right dominant side, aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), and atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular pulse). R6's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented R6 required staff assistance with activities of daily living, reported no pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 27 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five residents reviewed for unnecessary drugs. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the consult pharmacist notified the physician or the director of nursing of the need for further documentation regarding the continued use of Risperidone (antipsychotic medication- a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) for Resident (R) 8 related to the unapproved diagnosis.Findings included:- R8's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of Lewy body dementia (type of progressive brain disorder that leads to a decline in thinking, reasoning, and independent function), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), recurrent major depressive disorder, and impulse disorder (sudden, forceful, irresistible urges to do something).R8's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 27 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain adequate blood samples for Resident (R) 6 's laboratory testing and further failed to obtain physician involvement for direction related to continued Coumadin (anticoagulant-blood thinning drug) and Lovenox (anticoagulant-blood thinning drug) administration without the required monitoring. Findings included: - R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting right dominant side, aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), and atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular pulse). R6's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented R6 required staff assistance with activities of daily living, reported no pain, and received anticoagulant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a water management program for waterborne pathogens including the Legionella disease (Legionella is a bacterium spread through mist, such as from air-conditioning units for large buildings. Adults over the age of 50 and people with weak immune systems, chronic lung disease, or heavy tobacco use are most at risk of developing pneumonia caused by legionella). This placed the residents in the facility at risk for infectious disease. Findings included: - On 01/16/34 at 03:42 PM, Maintenance Staff U stated he took over the position a couple of months ago and did not know anything about the water management process. He stated it was not implemented. On 01/17/24 at 02:45 PM, Administrative Staff A stated Maintenance Staff U probably did not know the building was at risk for Legionella. The facility's Water Management policy dated 06/20/23, documented the director of environmental services was responsible for all relevant details regarding roles…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to properly store medication and biologicals in one of two medication rooms. This placed the residents at risk of ineffective medication. Findings included: - On 01/16/24 at 02:46 PM, observation revealed the north hall medication refrigerator lacked evidence staff assessed and recorded temperatures from 01/11/24 through 01/15/24 (five days). Licensed Nurse (LN) H stated it was the night shift nurses' responsibility to check and log the refrigerator temperature. On 01/17/23 at 01:47 PM Administrative Nurse D verified the medication refrigerator temperature should have been checked daily and recorded on the log. The facility's Monitoring of Refrigerators and Freezers policy, dated 10/09/23, documented that medicine or drug refrigerators will be kept solely for the purpose of storing medications that require refrigeration according to the manufacturer's instruction. Refrigerators containing vaccines will have temperature monitored…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 31 residents. The sample included 14 residents with five residents reviewed for immunizations to include pneumococcal (a disease that refers to a range of illnesses that affect various parts of the body and are caused by infection) vaccinations. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to follow the latest guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) when they failed to offer, obtain an informed declination, or a physician-documented contraindication for pneumococcal PCV20 vaccination. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk of acquiring, spreading, and experiencing complications from the pneumococcal disease. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R) 5, R7, R18, R19, and R24's clinical medical records lacked evidence of consent, informed declination, or physician-documented contraindication for the current pneumococcal vaccine PCV20. On 01/16/24 at 12:00 PM, Administrative Nurse E stated she had faxed the doctors about the PCV20 in November to talk about it when they came in for nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for two residents, Resident (R) 4, for her diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), supplemental oxygen use and R5's care related to a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin. This placed the residents at risk for impaired care due to uncommunicated care needs. - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R4 documented diagnoses of COPD and shortness of breath. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R4 had severely impaired cognition and was dependent upon staff for toileting and showers. R4 required substantial to maximum assistance for mobility and partial to moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 14 residents with seven reviewed for behaviors. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan with person-centered interventions for behavioral triggers for one resident, Resident (R) 14, who had a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD-psychiatric disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress, such as natural disaster, military combat, serious automobile accident, airplane crash or physical torture). This placed the resident at risk for decreased quality of life due to uncommunicated care needs, Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record for R14 documented diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and PTSD. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), 11/22/23, documented R14 had intact cognition and was dependent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with one reviewed for edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician as ordered for Resident (R)3's weight increase. This placed the resident at risk for complications related to edema. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R3 documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), edema, hypertension (high blood pressure), and dyspnea (difficulty breathing). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R3 had intact cognition and required limited to extensive assistance from two staff for activities of daily living (ADL). The assessment further documented R3 was short of breath upon exertion, when resting, and lying flat.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with two reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate respiratory care and services for Residents (R) 3 and R4 when staff failed to store their oxygen tubing and cannula in a sanitary manner when not in use. This placed the residents at increased risk for an infection. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R3 documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), edema, hypertension (high blood pressure), and dyspnea (difficulty breathing). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R3 had intact cognition and required limited to extensive assistance of two staff for activities of daily living (ADL). The assessment further documented R3 was short of breath upon exertion, when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with seven reviewed for behaviors. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a trauma informed care assessment for Resident (R)14, who had a diagnosis of post -traumatic stress disorder (PTSD-psychiatric disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress, such as natural disaster, military combat, serious automobile accident, airplane crash or physical torture). This placed the resident at risk for unmet behavioral and mental health needs. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record for R14 documented diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and PTSD. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), 11/22/23, documented R14 had intact cognition and was dependent on staff for transfers, toileting, showers, and required substantial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify Resident (R) 5's physician of elevated blood sugar per the physician ordered parameters and failed to initiate R19's prescribed bowel treatment which placed both resident at risk for impaired care and adverse medications effects. Findings included: - R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of chronic congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), diabetes melilites (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin)with kidney complications and neuropathy (weakness, numbness and pain from nerve damage, usually in the hands and feet), pain, hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings pf sadness), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication, or a documented physician rationale which included the multiple attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management and risk versus benefits to continue the use of an antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat major mental conditions which cause a break from reality) for Resident (R) 9 who had a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), R7 who had diagnoses of dementia and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and R19 with a diagnosis of depression. This placed the residents at risk for unnecessary psychotropic (alters mood or thoughts) medications and related complications. Findings included: - R9's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of dementia, anxiety (mental or emotional reaction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-06-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure principles of antibiotic stewardship were followed to ensure antibiotics were used in a safe and effective manner to prevent unnecessary side effects of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in an ongoing, proactive manner. Findings included: -Review of the Infection Control Tracking Log for tracking and trending infections from May 2021 through May 2022, revealed lack of Infection Control Logs for July 2021, September 2021, October 2021, November 2021, December 2021, January 2022, April 2022, and May 2022. The Infection Control logs reviewed lacked complete data for analysis of adherence with an evidenced-based surveillance criterion to define infections and effectiveness of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. The logs revealed incomplete documentation of culture results of organism identification for monitoring trends in infections. An interview on 06/06/22 at 08:37 AM with Administrative Nurse E identified herself as the facility Infection Preventionist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-06-07 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 34 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the staff person designated as the Infection Preventionist, who was responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program, completed the specialized training in infection prevention and control. This placed the residents at risk for lack of identification and treatment of infections. Findings included: - On 06/07/22 at 08:31 AM, Administrative Nurse E stated she was responsible for the Infection Prevention and Control Program and lacked certification as an Infection Preventionist. Administrative Nurse further stated she was going through the training but had not completed it yet. On 06/07/22 at 05:23 PM Administrative Staff A stated that the former Director of Nursing had an Infection Preventionist Certification and the previous Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator also had a certification. The facility had been without a certified Infection Preventionist for about a month. The Infection Control Policy approved 01/04/19 documented the infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Two residents were sampled for elopement. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for cognitively impaired Resident (R) 15 to prevent an elopement (when a cognitively impaired resident leaves the facility without staff supervision or knowledge). The facility failed to determine a root cause analysis for falls and failed to ensure preventive measures where in place to prevent further falls for resident (R)17, and R13. And the facility lacked a recent smoking assessment for R20. This placed R15 at risk for accidents and related injuries and put R17, R13, and R20 at risk for injury and or/harm. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R15 documented the following diagnoses: dementia with behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion and behaviors), and major depressive disorder, severe with psychotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The facility had seven residents in quarantine due to a positive COVID-19 (a highly contagious severe acute respiratory illness) virus status. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff properly donned (put on) the required personal protective equipment (PPE-gowns, gloves, mask, and eye protection) and disposed of PPE after use, failed to monitor resident's temperature and respiratory status daily during an outbreak of the COVID-19, and failed to ensure that staff appropriately sanitized, cleaned, and maintained designated resident COVID-19 quarantine areas. This placed facility residents at risk for possible COVID-19 transmission and severe respiratory complications. Findings included: - On 06/07/22 at 12:30 PM Licensed Nurse (LN) K wore an KN95 (a mask made of synthetic material used to protect from outside particles) mask as she pushed a cart with disposable meal containers and disposable cups with lids down the north hall to COVID here R15 and R24's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Resident (R)15 was sampled for reporting of an alleged violation. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that an incident of potential neglect was reported to the state agency in the required timeframe and failed to submit the incident investigation in the required timeframe. This placed R15 at risk for ongoing neglect and inadequate cares. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R15 documented the following diagnoses: dementia with behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion and behaviors), and major depressive disorder, severe with psychotic symptoms (a mental disorder in which a person has depression along with loss of touch with reality). The Significant Change Minimum Date Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R15 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of one which indicated severely impaired cognition.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents with 12 residents reviewed for development of comprehensive care plan. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop person-centered comprehensive care plans for Resident (R) 13 related to dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) care and services. This deficient practice placed them at risk for increased behaviors, confusion, and decline in ability to maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - R13's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness), and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to revise the person-centered care plan with appropriate interventions to prevent future falls for Resident (R) 13 and R17, which placed these residents at risk for future falls and related injuries. Findings included: - R13's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness), and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of three which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented that R13 required limited assistance of one staff member for activities of daily living (ADL's). The MDS for R13 documented no behaviors…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported irregularities for Resident (R) 23 for lack of appropriate diagnosis for medication administration. The facility failed to follow the CP recommendation for physician documentation of benefit and continued use it of an as needed (PRN) antipsychotic medication (class of medications used to treat psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment testing) and other mental emotional conditions) and antianxiety medication (class of medications that calm and relax people with excessive anxiety, (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) nervousness, or tension) for R23. This deficient practice placed R23 at risk for the potential of unnecessary medication administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure appropriate diagnosis for medication administration for Resident (R) 23, and failed to ensure consitent bowel monitoring was completed for R13, which placed R23 and R13 at risk for the potential of unnecessary medication administration thus leading to possible harmful side effects. Findings included: - R23's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented severely impaired cognition per staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician documentation of risk versus benefit for continued use it of an as needed (PRN) antipsychotic medication (class of medications used to treat psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment testing) and other mental emotional conditions) and antianxiety medication (class of medications that calm and relax people with excessive anxiety, (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) nervousness, or tension) for R23. This deficient practice placed R23 at risk for the potential of unnecessary medication administration thus leading to possible harmful side effects. Findings included: - R23's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-06-07 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 34 residents. Base on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the required 15 months of posted staffing for nursing coverage and failed to post the current nursing hours daily as required. Findings Included: - Review of the facility's posted nursing hours from 03/06/21 through 03/06/22 (12 months) revealed the facility lacked the required records for multiple occasions in 2021 (3/6, 3/7, 3/8, 3/9, 3/10, 3/11, 3/12, 3/15 thru 4/16, 4/17, 4/18 thru 5/5, 5/6, 5/7 thru 5/25, 5/27, 5/28 thru 8/1, 8/3 thru 8/24, and 8/26 thru 12/31) and multiple occasions for 2022 (1/1 thru 5/8, 5/9, and 5/11 thru 6/6). The facility provided three staff posting forms with no dates listed. On 06/02/22 at 07:58 AM the posted nursing staffing sheet was dated 05/09/22. On 06/06/22 at 08:53 AM the posted nursing staffing sheet was dated 05/09/22. On 06/07/22 at 04:46 PM in an interview, Administrative Nurse D stated she was not aware about the posted nursing staff sheet. Administrative Nurse D stated the posted nursing sheet had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-06 for 81 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
KARL, LARRYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/01/1975
ANDERSON, FRANCISIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/21/2007
BLACK, PAMELAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/10/2017
COCHRAN, LESLEYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/15/2022
FLIPPO, SCOTTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/15/2019
JONES, CHRISTOPHERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/01/1990
MOHR, HAROLDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/19/2010
SHEETS, AUDREYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 5%Other / private 19%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$260per resident / day
operating cost
$7,895per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$238per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175475. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next