Medicalodges Goddard
501 Easy Street, Goddard, KS 67052 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 60 certified beds · (316) 794-8635 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.8% | 17.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.2% | 4.9% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.4% | 2.9% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.2% | 6.5% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 7.8% | 4.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.6% | 16.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.6% | 23.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.5% | 4.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.7% | 22.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 0.9% | 18.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.9% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 72.0% | 73.8% | 79.4% | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 48.1 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.77 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.05 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2022-05-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 49 residents, with three residents reviewed for elopement (an incident in which a cognitively impaired resident with poor or impaired decision-making ability/safety awareness leaves the facility without the knowledge of staff). Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe/secure environment for cognitively impaired, independently mobile Resident (R) 1, with a known history of exit seeking, to prevent him from leaving the facility on [DATE] at around 08:00 PM. The facility failed to ensure all staff working were trained in elopement procedures, failed to have an effective system in checking the wandering alarm system for functionality at the exit door, and did not provide adequate supervision for R1. The resident remained outside of the facility for 17 minutes and staff found R1 walking west on the southside a four-lane divided highway, with speeds of 60 miles per hour. These failures placed R1 and one other resident with a WanderGuard and at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and permanently maintain an in-service training program for Certified Nurse Aide (CNAs) with the required topics and no less than 12 hours per year. Two of the five nurse aides sampled lacked the required training topics. Two of five nurse aides sampled lacked the required 12 hours per year of in-service training. Findings included:- On 01/14/26 at 03:05 PM, review of training records for five CNAs employed by the facility for more than one year revealed two CNAs had less than 12 hours of documented in-service training for the previous 12 months. CNA HH had one hour of documented training, and CNA II had eight hours of documented training. On 01/14/26 at 03:05 PM, review of training records for five CNAs employed by the facility for more than one year revealed CNA HH and CNA II did not have the required topics for in-service training for the previous 12 months. On 01/14/26 3:05 PM, Administrative Nurse D confirmed the CNAs were required to have 12 hours of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Five staff were reviewed for background checks. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy when facility failed to ensure background checks were completed for one staff. Findings included:- On 01/14/26 at 3:05 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated she was unable to locate the background check for Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) HH. She said she was aware it was a requirement for all staff to have a background check. On 01/15/26 at 10:23 AM, Administrative Staff A stated it was the expectation that all staff have background checks, per the facility's policy. The facility's policy Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 10/02/22, documented all new employees will be investigated prior to employment for a previous history of abuse, neglect, or exploitation.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 45 residents; the sample included 13 residents. Twenty-nine medications administrations were observed with three errors identified resulting in a medication error rate of 10.34 %. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below five percent. Findings included:- Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for Resident (R) 46 revealed the following orders: 1. Citalopram (a medication used to treat depression) 10 milligrams (mg), give one tablet by mouth one time a day. 2. Folic acid (a supplemental vitamin) one mg, give one tablet by mouth once daily. 3. Senna (a medication used to treat constipation) 8.6 mg, give two tablets by mouth two times daily. R46's EHR lacked orders for medications to be crushed and mixed. Observed on 01/15/26 at 07:12 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R, crushed together citalopram 10 mg, folic acid one mg, and senna 8.6 mg, and then gave them to R46. During an interview on 01/15/26 at 07:15 AM, CMA R stated R46's medications were always crushed together and then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with four residents reviewed for accident. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to clean reusable shared equipment between residents and failed to use proper Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) for R1 who had an indwelling catheter (tube placed in the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag) and wounds. Findings included:- On 01/14/26 at 07:55 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) N and CNA O entered Resident(R)1's room to transfer him with a mechanical lift. There was no visible EBP notification on the door. R1 had an indwelling catheter visible, with the tubing visible. CNA P and CNA O did not wear gowns during the care. On 01/14/26 at 10:17 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S finished a glucose check for Resident (R) 26 using a glucometer (instrument used to assess blood glucose levels) and proceeded to the cart. CMA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 45 residents; the sample included 13 residents. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to protect the dignity of Resident (R) 33 when staff was argumentative and used foul language while speaking to R33. Findings included:- During an observation and interview on 01/13/26 at 12:10 PM, R33 sat in her wheelchair. R33 stated she had requested the staff to perform additional vaginal area cleaning due to itching and irritation, and one of the staff members started to argue with her and used foul language. R33 requested her to leave several times, and the staff member said R33 was not her mother and left. R33 said she has had issues with that Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) before. During an interview on 01/15/26 at 09:04 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G reported R33 had reported to her that an evening aide was not handling her gently during cares and was not speaking to her appropriately, and she had requested for the CNA to leave. LN G said the CNA did not leave, and R33 had to tell her several times to leave. LN G said the CNA told…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 45 residents; the sample included 13 residents. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to inform Resident (R) 18 and/or his representative regarding the risks related to psychotropic (alters mood or thoughts) medications. Findings included:- Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for R18 included diagnoses of depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), insomnia (inability to sleep), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and chronic pain (persistent pain lasting over three months). R18's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The assessment documented R18's pain frequency was almost constant. The Psychotropic Drug Use Care Area assessment (CAA), dated 01/02/26, documented R18 had been administered antidepressant (a class…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with two residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold and written notification of transfer for Resident (R) 49 and failed to provide written notification of transfer for R33. The facility additionally failed to notify the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO). Findings included:1. R49's Progress Notes dated 11/04/25 at 12:36 PM, documented another facility had arrived to pick up R49 to transport her to their facility for transfer. R49 would not wake up, and efforts to arouse R49 were ineffective. Staff notified Emergency Medical Service (EMS), and EMS transported R49 to the hospital. R49's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) lacked evidence the facility provided written notification of the transfer, and a bed hold notice to R49 and/or his representative. The facility was unable to provide evidence of notification to the LTCO for R49's transfer. 2. R33's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 45. The sample included 13 residents with one resident reviewed for mobility or range of motion (ROM - the full movement potential of a joint, usually its range of flexion and extension). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement an assistive program to help maintain ROM and prevent a potential decrease in ROM/mobility for Resident (R) 22. Findings included:- R22's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness) and a paralytic gait (a walking pattern characterized by stiffness, decreased coordination, and muscle weakness). R22's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, which indicated R22 was unable to complete the interview. Per staff interview, he had short-term and long-term…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 45 residents; the sample included three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow an intervention to prevent further falls after a fall for Resident (R) 6. This placed the residents at risk for further falls and related injuries. Findings included:- R6's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) documented diagnoses which included anxiety (a mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), dialysis (a procedure where impurities or wastes are removed from the blood), and hyperextension (movement at a joint to a position beyond the joint's normal maximum extension). R6's 03/25/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented R6 had no falls within the last six months or while admitted . R6's Falls Care Area Assessment documented R6 was at risk for falls. R6's Care Plan documented she was at risk for falls related to confusion; initiated on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with three sampled for nutrition. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote Resident (R) 3's highest practicable nutritional status when staff failed to weigh the resident upon admission and readmission after hospitals stays in order to establish a baseline and/or identify weight loss. Findings included:- R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of paraplegia (paralysis characterized by motor or sensory loss in the lower limbs and trunk), osteomyelitis (local or generalized infection of the bone and bone marrow), right leg above-the-knee amputation (surgical removal of a body part), and left leg below-the-knee amputation. R3's 12/05/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS recorded R3 had a weight loss of five percent (%) or more in the last month or 10% or more in the last six…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 22 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 44 residents with three residents included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accident hazards on 01/14/25 when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M did not follow the standard of care and utilize another staff member assistance during the transfer of Resident (R) 1 from his wheelchair to his bed, using a Hoyer Lift (a mechanical device that helps people with limited mobility be transferred safely with minimal physical effort). Findings included: - The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The Care Plan revision dated 12/31/24 revealed R1 required assistance from staff with all transfers. An observation on 01/14/25 at 12:35 PM revealed CNA M transferred R1 from his wheelchair to his bed using the Hoyer lift by herself. An interview on 01/14/25 at 12:35 PM with CNA M revealed if the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43 with 3 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control measurements by the failure to cleansing hands between glove changes during a wound dressing change on Resident (R) 2. Findings included: - The Physicians Order dated 08/29/24 revealed R2 had diagnosis that included chronic multifocal osteomyelitis of multiple sites (local or generalized infection of the bone and bone marrow), and pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence as results of pressure or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, that indicated intact cognition. R2 had one stage three pressure ulcer injury over bony prominence upon admission. R2 used a pressure reducing device for chair and bed and was on a turning repositioning program. The Care Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-02-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store Controlled Medications (medications which fall under US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) Schedules II-V), have a potential for abuse, ranging from low to high, and may also lead to physical or psychological dependence), permitting only authorized personnel to have access related to diversion of controlled medication for three residents. Resident (R)145 for unknown quantity of Lorazepam, 0.5 milligram(mg) tablets (anti-anxiety medication), R 146 for unknown quantity of Oxycodone 10/325 mg. tablets (a narcotic/pain medication), and R 147 for unknown quantity of Lorazepam. Additionally, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for all residents by the failure to ensure one of two medication carts, used to store resident's medications remained locked when not in direct line of vision of the licensed nurse passing medications from their carts. Findings included: - On [DATE] at 10:29…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-02-26 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, (CMS) complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS (i.e., Payroll Base Journal [PBJ]), related to weekend staffing data is excessively low. Findings included: - Review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report submitted revealed weekend staffing data excessively low as follows: 1. The first quarter of fiscal year (FY) 2023, (10/01/22 through 12/31/22). 2. The second quarter of FY 2023, (January 01,2023 through March 31/2023). 3. The third quarter of FY 2023, (04/01/2023 through 06/30/2023). 4. The fourth quarter of FY 2023 (July 01/2023 through September 30, 2023). Review of the nursing staff schedule, agency staff, and staff postings for direct care on the weekends identified above were inaccurate and did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 38 residents with 13 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program with the failure of staff to follow infection control standards when delivering laundry to resident rooms and failure to follow the standard of practice when performing a partial bed bath to Resident (R) 195's perineum (the area of skin between the anus and the genitals). This deficient practice has the potential to lead to cross contamination between residents, and to place the residents receiving bed baths at increased risk of developing infections. Findings include: - On 02/20/24 at 12:46 PM, Laundry Staff I observed with an uncovered linen cart with clean linen being transported down the hallway, and Laundry Staff I delivered linens to several resident rooms while wearing the same gloves, no hand hygiene or glove change performed between contacts with resident rooms. On 02/20/24 at 12:50 PM, Laundry Staff I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-02-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe sanitary environment for the residents and staff in the facility laundry. Findings included: - On 02/22/24 at 08:04 AM, the tour of the laundry with Maintenance Staff J and Laundry Staff I revealed the following concerns: 1. The linoleum floor with multiple raised, unsealed, and unsanitizable areas throughout the laundry area. 2. The ceiling with an approximate six-foot brown stain. 3. An approximate four-to-five-foot section of the sheetrock wall had missing and bubbling paint. The wall with the bubbling paint measured approximately a 4 by 5-foot section. 4. A unpainted, unsealed, irregular textured epoxy patch along the wall which was unsanitizable. 5. Approximately one to two feet of torn sheetrock behind the soiled linen barrels storage. 6. Multiple broken and missing floor tiles. On 02/22/24 at 08:24 AM, the tour of the laundry with Maintenance Staff J and Laundry Staff I confirmed and agreed with the above identified concerns . On 02/22/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 38 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment to the residents that resided in the facility. Findings included: - On 02/22/24 at 04:00 PM, initial walk through of the facility with Administrative Staff A, identified a broken fiberglass reinforced panel (FRP - a waterproof plasticized product that is often used on high-contact surfaces such as walls or doors to prevent damage to the structural integrity of the material underneath), with a jagged edge approximately 10-12 inches off the floor on the door to the shower room on 100 hall that was only utilized by the residents on the 100 hall. On 02/22/24 at 04:05 PM, Administrative Staff A stated that the shower room would be removed from service until the door had been repaired and notified the appropriate personnel to remove and replace the panel. On 02/26/24 at 07:30 AM, surveyor verified with Administrative Staff A that the door panel had been replaced and with visual inspection of the shower room door on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 38 residents with 13 residents sampled, that included five residents selected for review related to dignity. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to protect the privacy and dignity of Residents (R)40 and R95. This deficient practice led to R40's and R95's respective urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine and into a collection bag) bags to be visible to visitors and other residents. This practice had the potential to lead to negative psychosocial effects related to dignity. Findings included: - R40's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed a diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, a non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate which can lead to interference with urine flow, urinary frequency and urinary tract infections). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13, which indicated intact cognition. R40 had an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 38 residents with 13 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one sampled resident, Resident (R)195, related to the use of indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag). This placed the resident at risk for uncommunicated care needs. Findings include: - R195's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses that included the following: urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system), lack of coordination, overactive bladder, encounter following surgical amputation (surgical removal of a body part), osteomyelitis (local or generalized infection of the bone and bone marrow), need for assistance with personal care and generalized weakness. R195's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 38 residents, with 13 residents selected for review. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident (R)39, regarding the need for isolation. Findings included: - Resident (R)39's signed physician orders, dated 02/16/24 revealed the diagnosis included respiratory syncytial virus (RSV is a contagious virus that causes infections of the respiratory tract). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The resident required extensive assistance of two for daily care and was non-ambulatory. The resident received pain medication on an as needed basis for pain of 6/10 scale. The Quarterly MDS dated 12/22/23, revealed no significant changes in cognition or cares. R39's Care Plan dated 08/03/23 revealed the following: R39 required staff assistance with daily cares related to physical limitations. R39…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 38 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise one resident's care plans, related to adequate monitoring and care of Resident (R)26's multiple skin areas/wounds. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)26's undated Physician Orders, (POS) documentation included diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (MS- progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord) , anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction disorder characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) , chronic inflammation (a normal body's response to injury or infection) polyneuritis (inflammation of several peripheral nerves at the same time), and diabetes (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The Annual Minimum Data Set, (MDS) dated [DATE], documentation included a Brief Interview for Mental Status, score (BIMS) of 14, indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 38 residents. The sample included 13 residents with one resident sampled for skin condition, not related to pressure ulcer/injury. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring of one Resident (R)26's skin condition, to ensure resolution of multiple skin areas/wounds (20). Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)26's undated Physician Orders, (POS) documentation included diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (MS- progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord) , anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction disorder characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) , chronic inflammation (a normal body's response to injury or infection) polyneuritis (inflammation of several peripheral nerves at the same time), and diabetes (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The Annual Minimum Data Set, (MDS) dated [DATE], documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 38 residents with 13 residents sampled, that included two reviewed for urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag) care. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services of Resident (R)95 when resident was transported with the urinary collection bag above the level of his bladder. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect R95. Findings include: - Resident (R) 95's signed physician orders dated 02/09/24, revealed the diagnosis that included bladder neck obstruction (lack of ability to urinate and empty the bladder). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident required moderate assist with toileting and supervision with mobility. The resident had an indwelling urinary catheter (insertion of a catheter into the bladder to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-26 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct annual performance reviews for one of the two Certified Nurse Aides that the facility had employed over a year. Findings included: - During review of employment records for the two Certified Nurse Aides (CNA), employed by the facility for over a year, the facility failed to complete one of the two CNA's annual performance review for Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) K, hired 09/29/2015. The most recent unsigned performance evaluation for CNA K, dated 08/31/2022 (six months past due). On 02/22/24 at 10:30 AM, Administrative Nurse B verified CNA K lacked an annual performance evaluation, which should have been completed within 12 months. She reported the facility lacked a policy regarding completion of annual performance evaluations for employees, but she was aware it was a regulatory requirement. The facility lacked a policy to address the completion of annual performance evaluations. The facility failed to conduct annual performance reviews for one of the two Certified Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 38 residents with 13 residents sampled, that included two reviewed for urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag) care. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services of Resident (R)195 from lack of documented catheter care. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect R195. Findings included: - R195's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses that included the following: urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system), lack of coordination, overactive bladder, encounter following surgical amputation (surgical removal of a body part), osteomyelitis (local or generalized infection of the bone and bone marrow), need for assistance with personal care and generalized weakness. R195's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure no less than 12 hours per year required in-service training to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides for one of the two nurse aides employed for a year or more. Findings included: - During review of employment records for the two Certified Nurse Aides (CNA), employed by the facility for over a year, the facility failed to ensure no less than 12 hours per year required in-service training to ensure the continuing competence for Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) K, hired 09/29/2015. Review of her education profile revealed the CNA with 10.5 hours of continuing in-service training in the previous year. On 02/22/24 at 10:30 AM, Administrative Nurse B verified CNA K lacked the required 12 hours of continuing education to ensure competency. She reported the facility lacked a policy regarding the required 12 hours of in-service training annually for CNAs, but she was aware it was a regulatory requirement. The facility lacked a policy to address the required 12 hours of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 46 residents, with 12 sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive, accurate, standardized reproducible assessment within 14 calendar days after admission for Resident (R) 92. Findings include: - Review of Resident (R) 92's Electronic Health Record (EHR) dated 04/24/22 documented the following diagnosis: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA; a type of bacteria resistant to many antibiotics) of tracheostomy (opening though the neck into the trachea through which an indwelling tube may be inserted) stoma (surgically created opening of an internal organ on the surface of the body). The 04/29/22 admission Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) documented the assessment was in progress. R92 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The assessment should have been completed by 05/04/22 or 14 days after admission. The Care Area Assessment (CAA) due on 05/04/22 had not been completed for R92. The 04/25/22 Care Plan documented R92…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 46 residents with 12 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan when Resident (R)20 readmitted to the facility to include oxygen use. Findings included: - R20's signed physician orders dated 05/02/22 revealed the following diagnoses: dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness), and peripheral vascular disease (abnormal condition affecting the blood vessels). The 03/10/22 Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff for daily care. The resident had a urinary catheter. The resident readmitted with three venous and arterial ulcers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 46 residents with 12 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide bathing and grooming for three residents reviewed for bathing, as evidenced by lack of documentation on the bath record, long facial hair and dirty and long fingernails for Resident (R)25, R26, and R27. Findings include: - Resident (R) 25's signed physician orders dated 04/28/22 revealed the following diagnoses: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD; progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), bipolar disorder (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), schizophrenia (psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear). The 12/23/21 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 46 residents with 12 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure they had a system in place to change oxygen tubing, nebulizer tubing and cleaning of respiratory equipment in a timely manner for Residents (R) 20 and R92. Findings included: - R20's 05/02/22 Signed Physician Orders documented the following diagnoses: dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness), and peripheral vascular disease (abnormal condition affecting the blood vessels). The 03/10/22 Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. R20 required extensive assistance of two staff for daily care. R20 received oxygen therapy (O2). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe sanitary environment to prevent infection for Resident (R) 92, by not storing his oxygen mask, nebulizer (device which changes liquid medication into a mist easily inhaled into the lungs) mask, and urinary catheter (insertion of a catheter into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag) drainage bag in a sanitary manner. Findings Included: - An observation on 05/09/22 at 04:54 PM R92 laid in bed on his back with the head of the bed elevated. R92's oxygen (O2) mask laid on the floor and still had O2 flowing through it. R92's urinary catheter drainage bag also laid on the floor under the bed. On 05/10/22 at 01:09 PM R92's O2 mask laid on the mattress next to him with no barrier noted between the mask and the mattress. On 05/11/22 at 09:33 AM R92's O2 mask hung over the back of his wheelchair, with no barrier noted. R92's nebulizer mask sat on the bedside table with no barrier under it and not in a protective covering. On 05/10/22 at 1:30 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-01-15 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the posted daily nurse staffing sheets included accurate and identifiable information to include actual staff hours, as required. Findings included:- During an observation on 01/14/26 at 11:27 AM, the daily staffing sheet hung on the wall near the nurse's station. The daily nurse staffing form for 01/13/26 and 01/14/26 was posted and lacked the actual hours worked per shift for licensed and unlicensed staff providing resident care. Review of the daily staffing sheets from September 2025 through January 14, 2026, revealed some of September's staff sheets were filled out correctly. There were no staffing sheets for October 2025. November's staffing sheets lacked actual hours. December's staffing sheets lacked actual hours. January 1 through 6 staffing sheets lacked actual hours worked. January 7 through 12 had actual hours worked. On 01/14/26 at 11:27 AM, Administrative Nurse E stated she filled out the staff sheet and did not put actual hours on the posted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEDICALODGES EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/19/1976 |
| LUMENT REAL ESTATE CAPITAL LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | — | since 06/01/2025 |
| ALTENOR, JEAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/27/1993 |
| BUTLER, RICHARD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2003 |
| CHRISTMAS, KEVIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/27/2025 |
| COOVER, TERESA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/07/2016 |
| COX, GAREN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 02/26/1998 |
| DANIELS, JANA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/27/2025 |
| DILLON, WILLIAM | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/12/2022 |
| DOLL, GAYLE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 03/10/2005 |
| FISHER, KRISTYN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/28/2024 |
| GROVER, BRIDGET | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 06/01/2025 |
| HINES, SCOTT | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 03/19/2009 |
| KELLY, ELIZABETH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/27/2025 |
| LAGER, SHANNON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/22/2018 |
| LANTZ, KATHLEEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 10/22/2007 |
| LISTWAN, SAMANTHA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/05/2017 |
| MARSHALL, CAROL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/27/2006 |
| MCBRIDE, TRAVIS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/15/2012 |
| OTT, RON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 09/15/2006 |
| ROHLING MCCORD, CATHERINE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 06/09/2000 |
| SCHERTZ, AMBER | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 10/05/2023 |
| WAECHTER HARMON, LORI | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/03/2015 |
| MEDICALODGES INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2025 |
| BRYANT, RODNEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/07/2022 |
| NORTH, TIFFANY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/17/2022 |
| FUSION WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/15/2021 |
| ML-RE GODDARD LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 57 rows in the source record cover these 28 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $243K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175294. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.