Maple Heights Nursing & Rehabilitative Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 33.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 53 beds and averages 52.1 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.554 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 50 residents. The sample included three residents with three residents reviewed for hot liquid safety. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an environment free from accident hazards when on 02/15/26 Dietary Staff CC provided cognitively impaired Resident (R) 1 with coffee in a lidded cup, without obtaining the temperature of the coffee prior to giving it to her, and R1 spilled the coffee on herself. After the spill, the staff obtained the temperature of the coffee, which was 151 degrees Fahrenheit. R1 sustained second degree burns from the hot liquid spill. Findings included:- R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of generalized muscle weakness, dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 44 residents. The facility had one kitchen. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prepare, store, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions for the 44 residents in the facility, who receive their meals from the kitchen. This deficient practice placed the residents of the facility at risk for food borne illness. Findings included: - On 03/24/25 at 8:20 AM, during initial kitchen tour, observation revealed the following: Two 24 inch by 24 inch, air vent located above the cooking stove area covered with brownish grease/sticky substance and gray fuzzy substance blowing directly on the food preparation and stove cooking area. Four overhead florescent light fixtures had the covers missing and located over the food preperation area. One 36 inch by 24 inch return air grill covered with brownish gray fuzzy substance that covered the metal grill. Six round light bulbs with wire cages around the bulbs, located in the exhaust hood above the stove top with brownish gray fuzzy substance affixed to the wire cages.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO), Resident (R)9's and R15's facility-initiated discharge to the hospital. This placed the residents at risk for impaired rights. Findings included: -R9's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of included healing fracture neck of the left femur (thigh bone,) dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) osteoporosis (abnormal loss of bone density and deterioration of bone tissue with an increased fracture risk,) and muscle weakness. R9's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented R9 required extensive assistance of two staff with bed mobility and transfers. The MDS further documented the resident had no falls since reentry on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 15 residents with one reviewed for pressure ulcers. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to initiate effective interventions to prevent the development of a left heel, facility acquired, unstageable pressure ulcer (depth of the wound is unknown due to the wound bed being covered by a thick layer of other tissue and pus,) for Resident (R) 9. Findings included: - R9 's diagnoses included healing fracture neck of the left femur (thigh bone,) dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) osteoporosis (abnormal loss of bone density and deterioration of bone tissue with an increased fracture risk,) and muscle weakness. R9's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented required extensive assistance of two staff with bed mobility and transfers. The MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 15 residents, of which five were reviewed for medication use. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identify and report Resident (R) 39's antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) medication had an approved indication for use. This placed the residents at risk for inappropriate use of medication. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R39 documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure) without behavioral disturbance, vitamin D deficiency, and hypothyroidism (a condition characterized by decreased activity of the thyroid gland). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented severely impaired cognition. R39 required set-up assistance from staff for eating, oral hygiene, and partial assistance with dressing.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 15 residents, of which five were reviewed for medication use. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identify and report Resident (R) 39's antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) medication had an approved indication for This placed the residents at risk for inappropriate use of medication. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R39 documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure) without behavioral disturbance, vitamin D deficiency, and hypothyroidism (a condition characterized by decreased activity of the thyroid gland). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented severely impaired cognition. R39 required set-up assistance from staff for eating, oral hygiene, and partial assistance with dressing. R39…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 31 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label Resident (R) 12 and R31s' insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) flex pens when started in use and when expired. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for ineffective medications. Findings included: - On 03/24/25 at 09:10 AM, observation of the facility's 100 and 200 hall treatment cart revealed the following: R12's Lantus (long-acting insulin) two flex pens were not labeled with an open or expired date. R31's Humalog (fast-acting insulin) flex pen was labeled with an open date of 02/26/25 and expired date of 03/19/25. (Date of observation 03/24/25 - 5 days past expiration) On 03/24/25 at 09:15 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the nurses should label and date the insulin flex pens with the date opened and the expiration date and should discard the expired insulin pens. Medlineplus.gov directs open, unrefrigerated Lantus and Humalog can be used within 28 days; after that time, they must be discarded. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 44 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary environment for Resident (R) 15 when staff failed to clean his carpet and recliner. Findings included: 03/24/25 at 10:00 AM, R15's room had a black stain in the carpet in front of a recliner, approximately 18 inches (in) long by eight in wide. The recliner had a red stain on the left arm , approximately six in. by three in wide. The left arm cover had a yellow stain , approximately two in by two in. The room and the recliner had a urine odor. 03/25/25 at 11:47 AM Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) V verified there was a urine odor in R15 room. HS V stated the urine smell was in the carpet and the recliner. HS v verified the stains in the carpet and on the recliner and stated she had cleaned the carpet several times and could not get the urine odor out, it was probably in the carpet pad also. 03/25/25 11:59 AM Administrative Staff A stated she was aware of the urine smell in the resident's room and recliner. The stain in front of the recliner is from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 36 residents with one kitchen. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain sanitary dietary standards related to storage of food. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk related to food borne illnesses and food safety concerns. Findings included: - On 06/13/23 at 07:15 AM in the kitchen's small refrigerator an observation revealed a bag of mozzarella cheese open with no date. On 06/13/23 at 07:16 AM in the kitchen's small refrigerator an observation revealed bacon, cut into small pieces, in a resealable bag that had no label or date. On 06/13/23 at 07:17 AM in the kitchen's small refrigerator an observation revealed three, unlabeled bottles of salad dressing that were open with no date. On 06/13/23 at 07:26 AM on a small storage shelf in the main kitchen area, an observation revealed a bag of raisin bran cereal that was opened with no date. On 06/13/23 at 07:34 AM in the kitchen's large refrigerator an observation revealed one resealable bag of various lunch meat. The bag did not have a label…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to secure chemicals in a safe, locked area, and out of reach of the nine cognitively impaired, independently mobile residents. The facility additionally failed to identify and implement resident centered fall intervention for Resident (R)20's repeated falls and failed to ensure implemented interventions identified during some investigations were added to the R20's plan of care. The facility further failed to prevent an avoidable accident when staff failed to ensure the floor was dry prior to a transfer, resulting in a fall for R18. This placed the affected residents at risk for preventable accidents and related injuries. Findings Included: - On 06/13/23 at 07:03AM an inspection of the facility's 100 and 200 hallway shower rooms revealed unsecured disinfectant cleaning products accessible inside both unlocked rooms. An inspection of the 100 hallway revealed an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 36 residents. Based of observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure safe storage and handling of the resident's medications. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for unnecessary medication and administration errors. Findings Included: - On 06/13/23 at 07:02AM a medication treatment cart outside Resident (R)10's room contained a Novolog Flexpen (injectable short-acting hormone which regulates blood sugar) left unsecured on top of the cart from 07:02AM to 07:10AM. The insulin belonged to R10. At 07:10AM Licensed Nurse (LN) G returned to the cart and secured the pen. On 06/15/23 at 12:34PM Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated medication should be secured when not being immediately administered or supervised. He stated staff should locked up medication in the cart when stepping away from the cart. On 06/15/23 at 01:02PM Administrative Nurse D stated staff were expected to lock up medication when not in use or keep constant supervision on medication being prepared for the residents. A review of the facility's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$12,735 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $12,735 — penalty dated 2026-03-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $60K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS