Parkside Homes
200 Willow Rd, Hillsboro, KS 67063 · Non profit - Other · 50 certified beds · (620) 947-2301 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $56,941 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-08)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 34.5% | 17.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.1% | 4.9% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.8% | 1.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.7% | 2.9% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.5% | 6.5% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 10.9% | 4.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 27.7% | 16.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.5% | 23.2% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.1% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.0% | 4.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.8% | 22.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.5% | 18.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.0% | 1.9% | 1.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.38 | 1.80 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.61 | 2.13 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 55% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.6%CMS range 32.0–57.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.4%CMS range 6.8–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.6%CMS range 4.8–15.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.30 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 32.0 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.01 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.83 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.35 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 38 residents with two residents reviewed for risk of elopement (an incident in which a cognitively impaired resident with poor or impaired decision-making ability/safety awareness leaves the facility without knowledge of staff). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and a safe environment, as free of accident hazards as possible, to prevent the elopement of cognitively impaired and independently mobile Resident (R)1. On 03/31/24 at approximately 11:30 AM, R1 attempted to exit the front door of the house she resided in without success, and then exited the house into the gated courtyard, followed by staff. R1 was agitated and voiced she wanted to leave. After sitting outside for approximately 45 to 60 minutes with staff, the staff accompanied R1 inside the main building. On 03/31/24 at 03:00 PM, the staff attempted to take R1 back to the house without success. On 03/31/24 at 04:49 PM, R1 exited the front entrance of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 34 resident, with 12 sampled, including seven residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free from accident hazards for five residents. The facility failed to include fall prevention interventions on the care plan for Resident (R)238, who fell and sustained deep lacerations to his face, which required transfer to the ER and sutures/stitches and glue as treatment. The facility further failed to implement new care plan interventions to prevent further falls for R31 and failed to investigate the fall experienced by R24. The facility also failed to ensure staff did not leave R10 unattended in his bathroom, attached to the sit to stand mechanical lift (helps transfer patients from one seated surface to another) and staff also did not provide adequate supervision to R18 when staff left R18 unattended in his room and R18 attempted to self-transfer from his wheelchair. These deficient practices…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 38 with three residents included in the sample. Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to prevent a medication error when Licensed Nurse C did not follow the physician order and incorrectly administered five times the ordered amount of Ativan to Resident (R)1, who was on hospice. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) dated 10/24/24 indicated the diagnosis of dementia with agitation (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS noted R1 had behaviors symptoms of physical and verbal towards others. The 01/02/25 Significant Change (MDS) indicated R1's placement on hospice. The Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 10/24/24 revealed behaviors triggered due to the physical, verbal abuse towards staff. The contributing factors included unspecified dementia with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that meals were served at safe and appetizing temperature. Residents (R) 24 and 35 complained of cold food temperatures at meals. Findings included: - On 10/07/24 at 11:11 AM, Resident (R) 24 reported that the food was cold at times, when it should be hot. R24 revealed he was the President of the Resident Council and the concern for cold food had been discussed in the meetings over the past several months and it had improved a little. On 10/08/24 at 09:35 AM, R35 was assisted to the dining room for breakfast by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) J. Dietary Staff G prepared R35's food from warmer, then covered the dish as CNA J was not ready to assist R35 with his meal. At 09:40 AM, Dietary Staff G uncovered the breakfast plate full of food, opened refrigerator door looked inside of it and closed the door, he then entered the kitchen leaving the food uncovered. At 09:46 AM, Dietary Staff G exited the kitchen with a container of applesauce, he poured some…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner to prevent possible food-borne illness to the residents of the facility. Findings included: - Observation of the small dining room kitchen and food storage areas on 10/07/24 at 09:10 AM, revealed the following areas of concern: One sealed bag of French toast, approximately half used, without open date or label. One carton of opened ice cream, without an open date. One unsealed bag of English muffins, without an open date. One sealed bag of bagels, raisin toast, waffles, omelets, and pancakes, without an open date. One bottle of strawberry syrup dated 08/20/24, with no expiration date noted. Two open bottles of electrolyte drink for residents, without an open date. One twelve ounce plastic cup filled with a smoothie, unsealed and without a date or label. One opened container of half and half cream, without open date. Observation of facility main kitchen on 10/07/24 at 09:20 AM, revealed the following areas of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to the maintaining a sterile (free from germs or microorganisms) field with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC-a form of access directly into the bloodstream via a vein that can be used for a prolonged period of time) dressing change for Resident (R) 238 and Dietary Staff G lacked proper hand hygiene during dining room service. Additionally, staff improper hand hygiene with catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid) care. The facility failed to set up enhanced barrier precautions (a set of infection control measures that use gowns and gloves to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes) (EBP). The facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of care for R13, regarding the use and cleaning of the nebulizer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-08 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff adhered to the principles of antibiotic stewardship through monitoring for the appropriate use of antibiotics prescribed for residents to prevent antibiotic resistance and spread of multidrug resistant organisms within the facility. Findings included: - Interview, on 10/09/24 at 02:09 PM, with Administrative Nurse C, reported she is the Infection Preventionist (a trained healthcare professional who works to prevent the spread of infections in healthcare facilities) (IP) of the facility. Administrative Nurse C revealed she always tracked when an antibiotic started, she reported that the nurses on the units did not always complete an infection screening evaluation or follow McGeer's Criteria (a set of guidelines for identifying infections in long-term care facilities) and that made it difficult to receive all of the resident's information. Administrative Nurse C reported that a resident who received an order for an antibiotic would have finished the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-08 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 74. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to address and resolve recurring issues reported by the Resident Council. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being. Findings Included- - A review of the facility's Resident Council Minutes from 09/2023 through 09/2024 indicated the council had recurring concerns with the food temperatures. The 10/19/23 Resident Council Minutes documented concerns that corn dogs were being served cooked on the outside but remained icy in the inside. The 10/18/24 Resident Council Minutes documented concerns that foods that were shelf-stable at room temperature were being served cold. The 02/15/24 Resident Council Minutes documented concerns that foods that were shelf-stable at room temperature were being served cold. The minutes lacked actions taken or outcomes for the repeat concerns. The 08/15/24 Resident Council Minutes documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 34 residents with 12 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of the four medication carts observed were locked while unattended. This deficiency had the potential to affect 14 residents located on the main campus. Findings included: - Observation on 10/07/24 at 11:42 AM, revealed an unlocked medication cart observed unattended in the main common area the main campus. All the medication drawers were easily opened. No staff was seen for approximately two minutes. Certified Medication Aide (CMA) H walked out of an activity room entrance that was next to the location of the medication cart. CMA H reported she just stepped away to obtain ice for the medication cart and stated that she normally locks the medication cart. CMA H confirmed the medication cart should have been locked when unattended and not in her vision. During an interview on 10/07/24 at 11:45 AM, Administrative Staff B confirmed that an unlocked medication cart was a concern . She reported the medication cart should have been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 34 residents, with 12 residents sampled, including review for advanced directives (a written document, which indicates the medical decisions for health care professionals when the person could not make their own decisions). Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's advanced directives were thoroughly completed. Resident (R)16 had a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR- or no code, a legal document or order that means the person does not desire cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR is an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when the heart stops beating] in the event of cardiac arrest), which was only signed by a physician. Findings included: - Resident (R)16 's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and depression. The [DATE] Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score, which could not be determined as the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 34 residents with 12 residents sampled, including one resident reviewed for notification of change. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident/resident's representative for Resident (R) 35, the right to be informed when the resident had a new order for an anti-psychotic (class of medications used to treat major mental conditions which cause a break from reality) medication dosage change. Findings included: - Resident (R)35 's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and encephalopathy (broad term for any brain disease that alters brain function or structure). The 07/08/24 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented a total mood severity score of 00, indicating no depression and noted R35 had behaviors of yelling, cursing and making noises for 1 to 3 days of the look back period. R35 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-08 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed R10 had the following diagnoses: dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), west Nile virus (WNV - a virus that is spread by mosquitos that can cause critical illness that can include encephalitis [inflammatory condition of the brain]), cataract (clouding of the lens of the eye), contracture (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle) and motor neuron disease (a condition that causes weakness in the muscles, leading eventually to paralysis). Review of the 6/20/24,admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The resident required maximum assistance with toileting, personal hygiene, rolling side to side, changing positions, transferring, propelling in wheelchair for mobility along with upper body dressing. A Progress Note dated 07/20/23 at 11:08 AM revealed R10 transferred to a hospital via…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 22 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-08 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #3 Activities of Daily Living Resident (R) pertinent diagnoses from (date) physician's order EMR documented: PAIN, UNSPECIFIED(R52), UNSPECIFIED DISORDER OF EYE AND ADNEXA(H57.9), GASTRO-ESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE WITHOUT ESOPHAGITIS(K21.9), DRY EYE SYNDROME OF UNSPECIFIED LACRIMAL GLAND (H04.129), IRON DEFICIENCY(E61.1), MYALGIA, UNSPECIFIED SITE(M79.10), ANEMIA, UNSPECIFIED(D64.9), ATHEROSCLEROTIC HEART DISEASE OF NATIVE CORONARY ARTERY WITH UNSPECIFIED ANGINA PECTORIS (I25.119), HYPOKALEMIA(E87.6), RESTLESS LEGS SYNDROME(G25.81), VITAMIN DEFICIENCY, UNSPECIFIED(E56.9), PULMONARY HYPERTENSION, UNSPECIFIED(I27.20), MIXED HYPERLIPIDEMIA(E78.2), NONRHEUMATIC AORTIC VALVE DISORDER, UNSPECIFIED(I35.9), OVERACTIVE BLADDER(N32.81), LONG TERM (CURRENT) USE OF ANTICOAGULANTS(Z79.01), OTHER KYPHOSIS, SITE UNSPECIFIED(M40.299), OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA (ADULT) (PEDIATRIC)(G47.33), CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE, STAGE 4 (SEVERE)(N18.4), UNSPECIFIED ABNORMALITIES OF GAIT AND MOBILITY(R26.9), NEED FOR ASSISTANCE WITH…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-08 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 34 residents with 12 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, The facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set for three residents, Resident (R) 35 related to falls and injections, R31 related to the use of a Foley catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag) and oxygen, and R 24 related to falls. This placed the residents at risk for uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - Resident (R)35 's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of repeated falls, dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), muscle weakness and closed fracture (broken bone without a break in the skin) with routine healing of right femur (thigh bone) and diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The 07/08/24 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 34 residents with 12 residents sampled that included one resident reviewed for baseline care plan. Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered baseline care plan for one resident, Resident (R) 238. This deficient practice had the potential to lead to uncommunicated needs and accidents. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed Resident (R)238 had the following diagnoses: extradural and subdural abscess (cavity containing pus and surrounded by inflamed tissue that is inside your skull or near your spine), Methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus infection (MRSA - a type of bacteria resistant to many antibiotics), sepsis (a systemic reaction that develops when the chemicals in the immune system release into the blood stream to fight an infections which cause inflammation throughout the entire body instead. Severe cases of sepsis can lead to the medical emergency, septic shock), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 34 residents, the sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan with interventions to address the enhanced barrier precautions for Resident (R)12's wounds, to ensure infection control precautions, which placed other residents at risk. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of hypertension (HTN- elevated blood pressure), chronic kidney disease (CKD- a long term condition where the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter the blood properly), restless leg, history of venous thrombosis (clot that developed within a blood vessel) and embolism (an obstruction in a blood vessel due to a blood clot or other foreign matter that gets stuck while traveling through the blood stream), and presence of vascular implants. The 07/23/24 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. R12 used a walker and wheelchair and required supervision or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 34 residents with 12 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for two residents, Residents (R) 24 and R31 related to falls and accident hazards. These deficient practices had the potential to lead to uncommunicated needs that would negatively affect the physical and psychosocial well-being of the residents. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for Resident (R) 24 revealed diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2 - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin) and unspecified epilepsy (a brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures and glaucoma (abnormal condition of elevated pressure within an eye which can cause loss of vision). Review of the 05/02/24 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 34 residents with 12 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess and address skin issues including open areas to her bilateral legs and edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues) for Resident (R) 12. This deficient practice had the potential to place R12 at an increased risk for development of additional medical problems. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of hypertension (HTN- elevated blood pressure), chronic kidney disease (CKD- a long term condition where the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter the blood properly, restless leg, history of venous thrombosis (clot that developed within a blood vessel) and embolism (an obstruction in a blood vessel due to a blood clot or other foreign matter that gets stuck while traveling through the blood stream), and presence of vascular implants. The 07/23/24 admission Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of atherosclerotic heart disease (heart disease caused by narrowing of the vessels on the heart), pulmonary hypertension (high blood pressure of the great vessels in the chest), congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA - a disorder in which the upper airways of the throat become constricted during sleep and can cause periods of apnea [absence of breathing]), and atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The assessment documented that R3 utilized a wheelchair or walker and required maximum/moderate assistance for personal hygiene, toileting, and bathing and received oxygen. R3's Activities Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 08/15/24 documented R3 received oxygen. The Care Plan provided by the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 34 residents with 12 residents sampled. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the pneumococcal vaccine (vaccine designed to prevent pneumonia [inflammation of the lungs which can be debilitating or lethal in the elderly]) declination form to four of the five residents reviewed. (Resident (R) 3,11, 17 and 238). Additionally, the facility failed to provide R3 with the influenza vaccine (a vaccine designed to prevent influenza [highly contagious viral infection]) declination form for one of the five residents reviewed. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) of 2023-2024 for R3, R11, R17 and R238 lacked documentation of the pneumococcal vaccine declination form. Review of the EHR of 2023 - 2024 for R3 lacked documentation of the influenza vaccine declination form. On 10/09/24 at 02:09 PM, Administrative Nurse C reported that Administrative Nurse B would keep the residents' consents and declination forms as she could not located declination forms for the residents in EHR. On 10/09/24 at 03:03 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store paints and glue securely and failed to lock an unalarmed exit door during extremely cold weather which was accessible to two cognitively-impaired independently mobile residents. The facility further failed to investigate and identify causative factors and implement meaningful resident centered interventions to prevent falls for Resident (R)20, R25, and R29. This placed the affected residents at risk for falls and fall related injuries. Findings included: - On 12/15/22 at 08:58 AM, observation in the unlocked nourishment room revealed the following: Four (4-ounce) bottles of acrylic glue, which label read not intended for use with children without adult supervision. Numerous (eight oz.) different colored bottles of acrylic paint, which label read choking hazard small parts not for children. On 12/15/22 at 08:58 AM, Activity Z verified the above findings and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store drugs and biologicals under proper temperature controls in one of two medication rooms. This placed the affected residents at risk for ineffective medication regimen. Findings included: - On 012/15/22 at 09:00 AM, observation during initial tour of the medication room in the main building revealed the temperature log for the medication refrigerator lacked daily temperatures for 11 days in October 2022, six days in November 2022, and three days in December. On 12/15/22 at 09:00 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) E verified there were missing days on the medication refrigerator temperature log. LN E stated evening shift staff were responsible for checking the refrigerator temperatures. On 12/21/22 at 10:30 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated that she expected nursing staff to check the temperatures of the medication refrigerator in the medication room daily to ensure it was running at the appropriate temperature for medication storage. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 14 residents with three reviewed for pressure injuries. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to notify the physician when Resident (R) 29 had a wound on his left heel. This placed R29 at risk for delayed treatment and impaired wound healing. Findings included: - R29's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R29 had diagnoses of weakness, osteoarthritis (chronic arthritis without inflammation), pain and diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin) with diabetic neuropathy (medical term for a condition in which there are problems with nerves in the body; either they have been damaged or are affected by a disease). R29's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R29 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of five, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented the resident required extensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to review and revise Resident (R) 20, and R25's plans of care with resident centered interventions to prevent falls and failed to update R29's care plan for pressure injury to the heel. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk of uncommunicated care needs as related to falls and skin breakdown. Findings included: -The Medical Diagnosis section within R20's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), fracture (broken bone) of left femur (thigh bone), , nondisplaced fracture of greater trochanter ( top of the thighbone) or right femur, repeated falls, urgency of urination, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, abnormalities of gait and mobility, diabetes mellitus (when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 14 residents with five residents reviewed for pressure injuries. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents received necessary treatment and services to promote healing for Resident (R) 29's left heel pressure injury (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). This placed R29 at risk for further injury, delayed healing and wound related pain. Findings included: - R29's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R29 had diagnoses of weakness, osteoarthritis (chronic arthritis without inflammation), pain and diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin) with diabetic neuropathy (medical term for a condition in which there are problems with nerves in the body; either they have been damaged or are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 14 residents with three reviewed for bowel and bladder and urinary tract infection (UTI-infection of any part of the urinary system). Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent UTIs when staff failed to change gloves during perineal (genital areas) care for Resident (R) 29, who had a history of UTIs. This placed R29 at risk for recurring UTI and related complications. Findings included: - R29's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented he had a diagnose of UTIs. R29's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R29 required extensive staff to supervision assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS documented R29 was frequently incontinent of urine, and occasionally incontinent of bowel. R29's ADLs and Incontinence Care Plan, revised 10/26/22, documented his increased risk of incontinence could increase his risk of skin irritation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 14 residents, of which five were reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain a stop date for Resident (R) 17 for use of as needed (PRN) antianxiety (class of medications that calm and relax people with excessive anxiety, nervousness, or tension) medication, which placed R17 at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic (medication that affects a person's mental status) medication. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R17's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), weakness, repeated falls, pain due to trauma and anxiety disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R17 had intact cognition, required extensive assistance of one staff for activities of daily living, received scheduled and PRN pain medication, and had two or more non-injury falls. The MDS further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-29 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 46 residents with 10 residents that attended the Resident Council meeting. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility residents' right to receive mail by not delivering mail to the residents on Saturdays. Findings Included: - Interview on 07/27/21 at 02:15 PM, with 10 residents that attended Resident Council meeting revealed that the facility does not deliver mail on Saturdays to any of the residents. Interview on 07/28/21 at 10:01 AM, with Dietary staff BB revealed the task of Saturday mail delivery was previously performed by the Activity Director, a now vacant position. Interview on 07/28/21 at 12:32 PM, with Licensed Nurse G who worked every other weekend revealed no one has passed mail on Saturday in a couple months. Social Services staff passed mail during the week. Interview on 07/29/21 at 11:37 AM, with Social Services Staff X revealed the Administrator told her the facility did not receive mail on Saturdays. Interview on 07/29/21 at 11:44 AM, with Postal Worker GG revealed the post office was willing to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-29 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide Notice to Medicare Provider Non-coverage (NOMNC) to two of the three residents reviewed, of his or her right to an expedited review of a services termination for Resident (R)18 and R34. Findings included: - The SNF [skilled nursing facility] Beneficiary Protection Notification Review, revealed that Resident (R)34's last covered day of skilled services ended on 04/19/21 and the facility initiated the discharge from Medicare A services when benefit days were not exhausted. The facility failed to provide R34 a NOMNC prior to discharge from skilled services. The SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review, revealed that Resident (R)18's last covered day of skilled services ended on 04/29/21 and the facility initiated the discharge from Medicare A services when benefit days were not exhausted. The facility failed to provide R 18 a NOMNC prior to discharge from skilled services On 07/29/21 at 10:05 AM, Social Services staff X, stated that she only provided an Advanced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-29 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 46 residents with 21 selected for review, including Resident (R)195 reviewed for baseline care plan. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the resident and the resident representative with a baseline care plan summary following admission to the facility. Findings included: - The Notes, dated 07/20/21, for Resident (R)195, revealed he admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Nursing Home admission Orders, dated 07/20/21, included diagnoses of anemia (condition without enough healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues), weakness, gastro esophageal reflux disease (GERD- backflow of stomach contents to the esophagus), weight loss, diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), Vitamin B12 deficiency, Benign prostatic hyperplasia/hypertrophy(BPH, non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate which can lead to interference with urine flow, urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 46 residents with 21 selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise Resident (R)25's care plan following falls. Findings included: - The Physician Orders, dated 06/21/21, for Resident (R)25, included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain ) of the knee, weakness, pain in left hip, pain in left knee, muscle weakness, and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed R25 with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated cognition intact. R25 required limited assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use, walking in room, and locomotion on and off unit. She required supervision and setup for walking in the corridor,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 46 residents with 21 selected for review including two residents reviewed for falls. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement new interventions for one Resident (R)25 following falls. Findings included: - The Physician Orders, dated 06/21/21, for Resident (R)25, included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain ) of the knee, weakness, pain in left hip, pain in left knee, muscle weakness, and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed R25 with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated cognition intact. R25 required limited assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use, walking in room, and locomotion on and off unit. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 46 residents with 21 selected for review including one resident reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store oxygen tubing and suction machine tubing, failed to change out the oxygen concentrator humidifier bottle, and failed to change/clean the suction machine canister. These practices increased the risk of Resident (R)38 developing a respiratory infection. Findings included: - The Physician Orders, dated 07/06/21, for Resident (R)38, included diagnoses of obstructive sleep apnea (disorder of sleep characterized by periods without respirations), and hypoxia (inadequate supply of oxygen). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed R38 with a Brief Interview of Mental Status, (BIMS) score of nine, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment and used oxygen while and while not a resident. The Quarterly MDS, dated 07/09/21, assessed R38 with the same BIMS score and did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 46 residents. The sample included 21 residents with six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately administer medications when staff gave R21 medications intended for R4 in error. Findings included: - The undated Physician Order, revealed diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin) with neuropathy (disease of one or more nerves causing numbness or weakness), chronic kidney disease, and hypertensive (high blood pressure) heart disease with heart failure. R21's Care Plan, dated 03/21/21, directed staff to give medications as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. A Nurses' Note, dated 05/09/21 at 01:22 AM, documented on 05/08/21, at approximately 10:45 PM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R administered the following medications to R 21: 1. Ferrous sulfate (iron supplement) 325 milligrams (mg) by mouth. 2. Pravastatin (medication for high cholesterol) 40 mg by mouth. 3.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$56,941 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $43,544 — penalty dated 2024-10-08
- $13,397 — penalty dated 2024-04-09
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-10-31 for 8 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CITY OF HILLSBORO | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 51% | since 11/01/2007 |
| MAGNSON, NEIL ALVIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2023 |
| RATZLOFF, GAYLA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2018 |
| SASSI, ASHLEY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| SCHMIDT, ALISA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| SCHMIDT, GARVIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2014 |
| BRYANT, STEPHANIE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2022 |
| HEINRICHS, KRISTA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 08/08/2014 |
| LOHRENZ, TIMOTHY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| YODER, EVAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| PARKSIDE HOMES INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/1966 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175387. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.