Salem Home
704 S Ash Street, Hillsboro, KS 67063 · Non profit - Other · 45 certified beds · (620) 947-1429 Medicare & Medicaid certified
On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.1% | 17.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.7% | 4.9% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.9% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 6.5% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.1% | 4.3% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.6% | 16.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.9% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.6% | 4.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.8% | 22.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.6% | 18.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.9% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.0% | 73.8% | 79.4% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.38 | 1.80 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.56 | 2.13 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 65.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 6.8–17.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 65.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 52.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 69.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.22 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 42.5 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.29 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.33 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.48 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2022-12-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident (R) 4 who was independent with ambulation and required staff supervision for safety due to a diagnosis of schizoaffective (mental health disorder that is marked by a combination of schizophrenia symptoms, such as hallucinations [perception of having seen, heard, touched, tasted, or smelled something that wasn't actually there] or delusions [altered reality that is persistently held despite evidence or agreement to the contrary], and mood disorder symptoms, such as depression [persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest] or mania [abnormally elevated, extreme changes in your mood or emotions, energy level or activity level]) disorder, intellectual disabilities, and a personal history of physical, sexual, and psychological trauma. The resident's care plan directed R4 should not be allowed to leave the facility without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare food in the main kitchen and kitchenette under sanitary conditions to prevent food borne illnesses. Findings included:- The initial tour of South Kitchen on 06/08/2026 at 08:13 AM with Dietary Staff BB identified the following concerns:The reach-in freezer had built-up frost on three shelves.Two deep freezers had food stuck to the top.The table holding coffee pots and a tea machine had dried-on fluids on the white plastic legs and a buildup of dust on the wooden board behind the table.The side by side two-door refrigerator had food on the bottom and front of the bottom door.There was no trash can by the hand-washing sink.Flour and sugar containers had flour and sugar on top of the lid.The kitchen floor drain had a build-up of an unknown substance. Additionally, the tour of the Kitchenette on 06/08/2026 at 10:04 AM with Dietary Staff BB identified the following concerns:The inside of the microwave had dried food throughout.The trash can had dried food and liquids on the top and sides. On 06/10/2026 at 09:13…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess and ensure cognitively impaired Resident (R) 4 ability to safely self-administer medications prior to leaving the medications with the resident to self-administer. Findings included:- R4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). R4's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. R4's MDS revealed he was administered an antidepressant (a class of medications used to treat mood disorders) and an opioid (a class of controlled drugs used to treat pain). R4's Cognitive Loss/Dementia, dated 05/27/2026, documented R4's cognition during this lookback period; R4 scored a 10 on his BIMs, indicating moderate impairment. R4's Care Plan, dated 06/03/2025, instructed staff to administer medications as ordered.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy for Residents (R)3 and R5, while staff performed cares in their rooms. Findings included:1. R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain). R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented that R3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, indicating moderately impaired cognition. He was always incontinent of bowel and bladder and dependent on staff for toileting hygiene. R3's Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 05/13/2026, documented that R3 required total staff assistance with toileting and transfers. R3's Care Plan instructed staff that he required total assistance with transfers and toileting hygiene. R3's EMR under the Task tab from 05/12/2026 through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate activity of daily living (ADL) assistance to Resident (R)3 when staff did not assist him to change his soiled clothing.- R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain). R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented that R3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, indicating moderately impaired cognition. He was dependent on staff for upper-body dressing. R3's Activities of Daily Living (ADL)/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 05/13/2026, documented that R3 had limitations in range of motion (ROM) on his left side and required staff assistance with dressing. R3's Care Plan, dated 05/08/2026, instructed staff that he required total staff assistance for dressing. R3's EMR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 17 with a bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP- a noninvasive ventilator that helps breathing) as per physician orders. Findings included:- R17's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of sleep apnea (a disorder of sleep characterized by periods without respirations) and Friedreich ataxia (a rare, inherited, progressive neuromuscular disease that damages the nervous system). R17's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14, indicating intact cognition. Total severity score of 0, indicating no depression. No behaviors noted. The resident required total staff dependence with bed mobility. R17's MDS documented that he had a non-invasive mechanical ventilator. R17's Functional Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 08/19/2025, documented: R17 was admitted following a hospitalization for ankle pain and lack of a caregiver at home. R17 does have a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services necessary to care for residents' needs related to provision of enteral tube feeding and medication administration via percutaneous enteral epigastric tube feeding (PEG tube-external device inserted in the abdomen to deliver nutrition, hydration, and/or medication directly to the stomach). Findings included: - Resident (R) 7's undated physician's order (POS) documented diagnoses which included cerebral vascular accident (CVA-stroke due to interrupted blood flow to the brain), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), dysphagia (impaired ability to swallow), and dementia (decline in mental abilities severe enough to interfere with daily life). R7's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of seven, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident was dependent on staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, observation and record review, the facility failed to implement adequate infection control practices related to respiratory equipment for Resident (R) 17 and hand hygiene during incontinence care for R7. Findings included:1. On 06/08/2026 at 09:49 AM, R17 was in his room in bed. His bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP- a noninvasive ventilator that helps breathing) mask lay directly on the floor on the left side of his bed. R17 reported that he has no place to put the BiPAP mask when he takes it off. On 06/09/2026 at 08:20 AM, R17's BIPAP mask was noted on the floor next to his bed. On 06/10/2026 at 07:55 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) L reported that she does not do anything with the BiPAP machines; the Certified Medication Aides and Licensed Nurses (LN) take care of them. CNA L reported the mask should not be on the floor, though. On 06/10/2026 at 07:59 AM, LN G reported that R17's BiPAP machine had been broken for about a month now. LN G reported that the mask should not be on the floor, that is should be placed in a bag, and reported that since he has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were stored, prepared, and distributed in a manner to prevent foodborne illness to the residents. Findings included: - Observation on 08/06/24 at 10:45 AM, revealed room trays for residents set with beverages. Two trays contained a glass of milk, and one contained a liquid nutritional supplement in a glass. Observation, on 08/06/24 at 11:15 AM, revealed Dietary Staff DD, obtained the temperature a glass of milk on the tray and revealed a temperature of 60 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Dietary Staff DD stated the milk should be served at 41 degrees F, and the supplier delivered the milk earlier and may not have cooled down to 41 degrees F. Dietary Staff DD obtained two new glasses of milk from newly delivered milk from the refrigerator and revealed a temperature of 48 degrees F. Dietary Staff DD obtained the temperature of the nutritional supplement and revealed a temperature of 57…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-07 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the Federal regulatory agency through Payroll-Based Journaling (PBJ) when the facility failed to accurately submit hourly staffing data for all nursing personnel. Findings included: - Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report for Fiscal Year (FY) for Quarter 3 - 2023 (April 1 - June 30), the data indicated the facility failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 hours/Day on the following dates: 04/01/23 Saturday (SA), 04/09/23 Sunday (SU), 04/16/23 (SU), 04/29/23 (SA) and 05/13/23 (SA). Review of the nursing schedule and payroll data sheets for the above dates revealed adequate hours to account for 24-hour nursing coverage. On 08/07/24 at 08:24 AM, Administrative Nurse D reported that payroll data and scheduling data reflected that 24- hour nursing coverage and that nursing staff were scheduled for either eight-hour or 12-hour shifts where no lunch was taken but the PBJ submission deducted a 30-minute period…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 44 residents on two halls with a commons area where residents gathered for meals and activities. The facility had two medication carts and a nurse treatment cart. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for nine residents by the failure to ensure a nurse treatment cart that contained insulin (a medication used to treat diabetes [a disease when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin]) remained locked when not in direct line of vision of the nurse. Findings included: - On 08/06/24 at 11:19 AM, a treatment cart on the 200 hall observed unlocked and unattended. On 08/06/24 at 11:20 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G confirmed the medication cart was left unattended and unlocked. LN G further confirmed that the cart serviced nine residents and contained insulin and general wound care supplies. LN G revealed that the medication cart should be always locked when unattended and stated that she failed to lock the medication cart before going the nurses'…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 44 residents. The facility identified two residents required pureed diets. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pureed foods were prepared to ensure nutritional and flavor compatibility with the menu to enhance the dining experience for these two residents. Findings included: - Observation, on 08/06/24 at 10:45 AM revealed Dietary Staff CC prepared pureed diet for two residents. The menu for the noon meal included beef soft taco with lettuce, cheese, tomato, sour cream, spanish rice, and fiesta corn. Dietary staff CC stated the facility form Mechanically Soft Level Two Diet indicated that staff should avoid corn or regular rice, so she substituted mashed beans (pork and beans) for the corn and mashed potatoes and gravy for the fiesta rice. Dietary staff CC stated she did not have a nutritionally equivalent substitute guide for the spanish rice or fiesta corn for pureed diets. Interview, on 08/07/24 at 09:00 AM, with Dietary Staff BB confirmed that the facility had a computerized program for dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 13 residents of which one reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)21 was treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner that promotes quality of life. This placed R21 at risk for impaired psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - R21's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded the resident had intact cognition and received daily insulin (a medication used for high blood sugar given by an injection). On 12/08/22 at 11:25AM, observation revealed R21 sat in his wheelchair at the dining table. Further observation revealed 23 other facility residents also sat in the dining room. R21 lifted up his shirt and exposed his abdomen and his right side and Licensed Nurse (LN) G administered a Novolog (insulin medication) injection at the table. On 12/08/22 at 11:35AM, LN G stated she always gave R21 his insulin in the dining room at the table. LN G then stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-06-10 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and/or dispose of garbage and refuge properly in a closed dumpster to prevent pests and odors, and related contamination. Findings included:- During the initial kitchen tour on 06/10/2026 at 09:13 AM, three dumpsters had piled, bagged trash which prevented the lids from closing and securing the garbage and refuge. On 06/10/2026 at 09:13 AM, Dietary Staff BB confirmed the dumpster lids were open and should be closed to contain trash and debris. The facility policy, titled Dumpster Policy, issued 05/2024, included dumpster lids must be closed after each use to help control pests, odors, and weather-related contamination.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ENSEY, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 09/30/2021 |
| HERBEL, DELAYNE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/29/2018 |
| JOST, JARED | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 08/29/2024 |
| KOSLOWSKY, THOMAS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 09/16/2018 |
| LANCASTER, MARY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 06/29/2023 |
| WIEBE, HENRY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/29/2018 |
| CROCKER, HEATHER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 04/10/2016 |
| MUNGAI, PETER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/10/2025 |
| DONAHUE, LISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/20/2024 |
| HAMM, JODIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/20/2024 |
| HAMM, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/20/2024 |
| REEH, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/13/2025 |
| WEBER, VIRGILENE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/20/2024 |
| WILLIAMS, ANGELA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/20/2024 |
| ZARAGOZA, ANGIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/20/2024 |
| SALEM HOSPITAL, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/15/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175484. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.