Pleasant View Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 86 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 61 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 72.4 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.39 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.70 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-10-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 78 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with two reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent a facility-acquired deep tissue injury (DTI- purple or maroon localized area of discolored intact skin or blood-filled blister due to damage of underlying soft tissue from pressure and/or shear) for Resident (R) 15, who sustained a DTI to her left buttock (either of the two round fleshy parts that form the lower rear area of a human trunk) when staff placed a bed pan under R15 backward and left it under her for too long. The facility staff further failed to remove a mechanical lift sling (a material device used in conjunction with a hoist, to assist in safely transferring a person) from under R15 and she sustained a reddened area on her right buttocks.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 79 residents, with three residents reviewed for abuse. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff responded appropriately with adequate supervision to prevent potential abuse and/or mistreatment of Resident (R) 1, a cognitively impaired resident. This placed R1 at risk for potential abuse and/or mistreatment. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain), weakness, and hypertension (high blood pressure). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 06/19/24, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, which indicated moderately impaired cognitive function. The MDS documented R1 had no behaviors during the look back period. The MDS documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 79 residents with three residents reviewed for abuse. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for Resident (R) 1 immediately, but not more than two hours, to the required entities including Law Enforcement (LE) and the State Agency. This placed the resident at risk for unidentified and ongoing abuse or mistreatment. Findings included: - R1 ' s Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain), weakness, and hypertension (high blood pressure). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 06/19/24, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine which indicated moderately impaired cognitive function. The MDS documented R1 had no behaviors during the lookback…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 79 residents, with three residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to immediately investigate an allegation of abuse for Resident (R) 1 and initiate protective measures to prevent further potential abuse until an investigation was completed. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for ongoing abuse and/or mistreatment. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain), weakness, and hypertension (high blood pressure). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 06/19/24, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, which indicated moderately impaired cognitive function. The MDS documented R1 had no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 78 residents and one kitchen. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food by professional standards for food service safety. This placed the residents who received their meals from the facility's kitchen at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - On 10/08/24 a 10:15 AM, observation in the kitchen revealed the following concerns: 1. Four upper and six lower wooden cupboards located by the three sinks had numerous different-sized scrapes on the outer surface. 2. Three wooden bottom cupboards and nine cupboard drawers located by the ice machine had numerous different-sized scrapes on the outer surface. 3. Two white fans on the wall had grayish debris on the blades. 4. The right door frame, located by the entrance to three sink areas, approximately four feet high, was missing a piece of trim. 5. A black trash can located to the left of the entrance door to the three sink areas had numerous different-sized streaks of brownish substance around…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 78 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify and dispose of expired medications appropriately. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for ineffective medications. Findings included: - On 10/07/24 at 02:59 PM, observation revealed the Harvest Household medication cart contained the following expired medications: A bottle of calcium supplements with an expiration date of 11/2023. A bottle of senior multivitamins (MVI) with an expiration date of 10/2023. A bottle of MVI with an expiration date of 06/2024. A bottle of magnesium oxide (supplement) with an expiration date of 08/2024. A bottle of D3 (vitamin) with an expiration date of 08/2024. A Metamucil (fiber laxative) canister with an expiration date of 08/2024. A bottle of bisacodyl (laxative) pills with an expiration date of 09/2024. A bottle of Preservision (vision supplement) with an expiration date of 09/2024. On 10/07/24 at 02:59 PM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R verified the dates on the expired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 78 residents. The sample included 18 residents with three reviewed for Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Beneficiary Liability notices. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 25 and R277 complete information on the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) Form-10123 which informed the beneficiary of the right to an expedited review by a Quality Improvement Organization (QIO). This placed the residents at risk of uninformed decisions about their skilled services and the inability to appeal. Findings included: - A review of the CMS Form 10123 informed the beneficiary that Medicare may not pay for future skilled therapy services. The form included directions for the beneficiary (resident or resident representative) to contact the QIO for questions regarding appeals. R277's NOMNC revealed Medicare Part A skilled services ended on 05/23/24. The facility provided CMS Form-10123 lacked the QIO name and contact information for R277. R25's NOMNC revealed Medicare Part A skilled services ended on 05/09/24.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 78 residents. The sample included 18 residents with seven reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent accidents for Resident (R) 5 when staff transported her in a wheelchair without footrests and R5 fell forward onto the floor and hit her head. This placed R5 at risk for injuries and increased pain. The facility also failed to ensure an environment free from accident hazards when staff failed to secure hazardous chemicals placing all confused, independently mobile residents at risk for accidental ingestion. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R5 documented diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), macular degeneration (progressive deterioration of the retina), and pain. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R5 had severely impaired cognition. R5 was dependent on staff for toileting and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 78 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure a communication process between the hospice provider and the facility for one of two residents reviewed for hospice services, Resident (R) 29. This placed the resident at risk of not receiving adequate end-of-life care. Findings included: - R29's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented the resident had diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), heart failure, and cerebrovascular disease (conditions that affect blood flow to your brain). R29's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented R29 required partial to moderate staff assistance with toileting hygiene, showering, upper…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-04-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 81 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to adhere to infection control for transmission based precautions (TBP-an infection control intervention designated to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove used during high contact resident care activities), for Resident (R)7, who had vancomycin resistant enterococci (antibiotic resistant bacterial infections), which placed the residents who received care from the exposed staff at risk for possible exposure of infection. Findings included: - On 04/24/24 at 04:00 PM observation revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O and CNA P entering the room of R7 who was on TBP. A sign was posted on the door giving instructions on personal protection equipment (PPE-gown and gloves). The room had a plastic tote with PPE supplies placed outside of the doorway. CNA O and CNA P entered the room wearing a surgical mask and transferred the resident from her wheelchair to the bed per sit to stand lift. The staff then assisted the resident with perineal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 81 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify Resident, (R) 26's physician and the resident representative of a bruise of unknown origin on R26's inner thigh. This placed the resident at risk for emotional and physical decline. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record for R26 documented diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness or unease), and depression with psychotic features (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, and emptiness). R26's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R26 had severely impaired cognition and required limited assistance of one staff for toileting, dressing, and was independent with ambulation, transfers, and bed mobility. The MDS further documented R26 had physical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS