Stanton County Health Care Facility Ltcu
404 N Chestnut, Johnson, KS 67855 · Government - City/county · 25 certified beds · (620) 492-6250 Medicaid only — no Medicare
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (13% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (24) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.6% | 17.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.4% | 4.9% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.1% | 2.9% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 6.5% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.4% | 4.3% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.3% | 16.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 1.1% | 23.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.0% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.3% | 4.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.4% | 22.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 31.0% | 18.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.60 | 1.80 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.38 | 2.13 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 25 beds and averages 19.8 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.27 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.23 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.70 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.43 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.45 to 0.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 13% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-28 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 22 residents and one kitchen. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to employ a full-time Certified Dietary Manager for 22 residents who reside in the facility and received their meals from the kitchen. This placed the residents at risk of not receiving adequate nutrition.Findings included:- On 08/25/25 at 10:45 AM, Dietary staff preparing for the noon meal, Dietary Staff (DS) BB present in the kitchen. DS BB identified herself as the Dietary Manager, was enrolled in a Dietary Manager Certification course, but had not yet finished the course. DS BB reported that the Registered Dietitian came to the facility monthly.The facility's Dietitian policy, dated 01/2025, documented that a qualified dietitian would help oversee clinical nutritional dietary services in the facility. A dietitian's qualification shall be based upon: Registration by the Commission on Dietetic Registration of the American Dietetic Association, or demonstrated education, training, or experience in the identification of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 22 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms, which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) for Resident (R) 1, who had an indwelling urinary catheter (tube placed in the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag) and shared use of a full body lift sling. This deficient practice placed the residents who reside in the facility at risk of infectious disease processes.Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in any part of the urinary system), right thigh blister, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder(the muscles that control the flow of urine out of the body do not relax and prevent the bladder from fully emptying), edema(swelling resulting from an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-28 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 22 residents. The sample included 12 residents, of whom six sampled residents were reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 2, R3, R16, and R18, were free from antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) medication use without an appropriate indication for use, a gradual dose reduction (GDR - tapering of a medication dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the dose or medication can be discontinued), or ensure the physician provided the risk versus benefit for the continued use of antipsychotic medications. These deficient practices placed R2, R3, R16, and R18 at risk of unnecessary medication administration and related complications.Findings included:- R2’s Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 22 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported to the Director of Nursing and the Medical Director for Residents (R) 2, R3, R16, and R18 for the appropriate use of antipsychotics (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality). The facility furtherly failed to ensure the CP identified and reported to the Director of Nursing and the Medical Director the missed vital signs required for R10 and R11's heart medications. This placed the residents at risk for inappropriate use of medications and unnecessary medications.Findings included: - R2’s Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) with behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 22 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 8 and R20 and their representative were provided a written notification of transfer upon the residents' transfer to the hospital. This placed R8 and R20 at risk of miscommunication between the facility and the resident's representative, and the possible missed opportunity for healthcare services.Findings included: - R8’s Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), chronic kidney disease (the kidneys have mild to moderate damage and are less able to filter waste and fluid out of your blood), heart failure (when the heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the body’s needs), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 22 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 3, who had a mental disorder and adjustment difficulties, with treatment and services to attain the highest practical mental and psychosocial well-being.Findings included:- R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) with other behavioral disturbance, urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in any part of the urinary system), nausea with vomiting, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), dizziness, and giddiness.R3's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented that R3 had severe cognitive impairment, had no signs or symptoms of delirium (sudden severe confusion, disorientation, and restlessness), psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 22 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five residents reviewed for dementia care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided the necessary person-centered activities and interventions to address Resident (R) 11's dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) diagnosis. This deficient practice placed R11 at risk of ineffective treatment and decreased quality of care.Findings included:- R11's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of dementia with psychotic disturbance (a condition characterized by cognitive decline accompanied by psychotic symptoms such as hallucinations and delusions), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), delirium (sudden severe confusion, disorientation, and restlessness), congestive heart disease (CHF- a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), and atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heart beat).R11's Annual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 22 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to identify the missed vital signs required for R10 metoprolol succinate (an extended-release, beta-blocker used to treat high blood pressure) medication and R11's digoxin (a medication used to treat CHF and heart rhythm problems) medication. This placed the residents at risk for unnecessary medications.Findings included:- R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of pleural effusion (a condition where excess fluid accumulates in the thin cavity between the lungs and the chest wall), hypertension (HTN- elevated blood pressure), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where the lungs are unable to provide enough oxygen to the body over a prolonged period, leading to low oxygen levels in the blood), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing).R10's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 22 residents. The Sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store drugs and biologicals for Resident (R) 4 according to policy in the medication cart. This placed the resident at risk for an ineffective medication regimen.Findings included:- On 08/25/25 at 02:08 PM, during the medication room tour, the medication cart labeled with R4's name contained a Lantus insulin pen without a name or date the insulin pen was put into use. Licensed Nurse (LN) G verified that the insulin pen should have a label with R4's name and the date it was put into use.The facility's Medication Storage policy, dated 01/28/25, documented that no outdated or deteriorated medications are available for use in the facility. All such medications are destroyed. Drug containers having solid, illegible, worn, makeshift, incomplete, damaged, or missing labels will be returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling before storage.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-10 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 23 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage eight hours a day, seven days a week, that placed all the residents who reside at the facility at risk of lack of assessments and inappropriate care. Findings included: - Upon review of Payroll Based Journal (PBJ- a required detail information submitted by nursing homes of staffing information that is required by the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS]) the facility reported a lack of RN consecutive eight-hour coverage for 20 dates during the months of April 2022, May 2022, June 2022, July 2022, August 2022 and September 2022. Upon review of the facility's schedule for Licensed Nurses of the months of April 2022, May 2022, June 2022, July 2022, August 2022 September 2022, October 2022, November 2022, December 2022, January 2023, February 2023, March 2023 and May 2023 a total of four dates lacked RN consecutive eight-hour coverage. On 8/10/23 at 08:15 AM, Administrative Nurse B stated she was unaware that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 14 citations
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 23 residents. The facility identified one central kitchen with one dining area. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sanitary food preparation and storage of food to prevent the spread of food borne illness to the residents of the facility. Findings included: - Initial environmental walk through of the kitchen on 08/07/23 at 12:20 PM with Dietary Staff C identified the following concerns: 1. In the side-by-side refrigerator, a container of strawberry topping labeled with an open date of 07/30/23. 2. In the side-by side refrigerator, a container of cream cheese labeled with an open date of 07/23/23. 3. In the side-by side refrigerator, a container of pre-sliced potatoes, lacked open or expiration dates. 4. In the side-by side refrigerator, a container of yellow cheese cubes labeled with an open date of 07/15/23. 5. In the side-by side refrigerator, a container of Swiss cheese, opened and unsealed and lacked open or expiration dates. 6. In the side-by side refrigerator, a container of cabbage, opened and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-10 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 23 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information to the federal regulatory agency through Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ), when the facility failed to accurately report the 24 hour per day, seven days per week Registered Nurse/Licensed Nurse coverage. Findings included: - Upon review of Payroll Based Journal (PBJ- a required detail information submitted by nursing homes of staffing information that is required by the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS]) the facility reported a lack of RN consecutive eight-hour coverage for 20 dates during the months of April 2022, May 2022, June 2022, July 2022, August 2022 and September 2022. Additionally, the PBJ report documented that the facility reported a lack of Licensed Nurse coverage 24/7 a total of 42 dates during the months of July 2022, August 2022, September 2022, October 2022, November 2022, December 2022, January 2023, February 2023, March 2023, and May 2023. Upon review of the facility's schedule for Licensed Nurses of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 23 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two residents reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dignity for one Resident (R10), by having an uncovered urinary collection bag visible to guests and other residents, placing the resident at risk for embarrassment and an undignified living environment. Findings included: - R 10's signed physician orders dated 07/31/23 revealed the resident had diagnoses that included neuromuscular disorder of the bladder (dysfunction of the urinary bladder caused by a lesion of the nervous system) and Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the resident rarely/never understood. The resident was total dependent of staff for all cares. R10 had an indwelling urinary catheter (insertion of a catheter into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag). Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 23 residents with 12 included in the sample that included one resident for hospitalization. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to send a copy of the facility- initiated hospitalization transfer/discharge notice to the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Ombudsman for Resident (R) 22, who required hospitalization. Findings included: - Review of R22's admission Data Set (MDS) tracking form documented the resident discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R22's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) lacked evidence of written notification of the facility-initiated hospitalization transfer/discharge notice to the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. On 08/08/23 at 02:30 PM Licensed Nurse (LN) K RN reported the resident had a fall while being transferred in the bathroom and resulted in a hospitalization with a fractured shoulder. On 08/09/23 at 03:00 PM, Administrative Nurse B…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 23 residents with 12 residents included in the sample. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a copy of the facility bed hold policy to Resident (R) 22 and/or his representative, with a written notice specifying the duration and cost of the bed hold policy, at the time of the resident's transfer to the hospital. Findings included: - Review of R22 Minimum data Set (MDS) tracking form documented the resident discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R22's Electronic Medical Record lacked evidence of written notification of the facility-initiated hospitalization transfer and bed hold to R22 or his representative. On 08/08/23 at 02:30 PM Licensed Nurse (LN) K RN reported the resident had a fall while being transferred in the bathroom and resulted in a hospitalization with a fractured shoulder. On 08/09/23 at 03:00 PM, Administrative Nurse B reported Medical Records staff was responsible for the bed hold…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 23 residents with 12 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change comprehensive assessment for two residents, that experienced a consistent pattern of change. Resident (R) 12 following a fall, changes in medication and use of oxygen, and for R 22, following a return from the hospital following a fall with fracture and a pressure ulcer developed in the hospital. Findings included: - R12's signed physician orders dated 07/31/23 revealed dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), acute respiratory failure, and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07, indicating severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 23 residents with 12 selected for review. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident (R)7, regarding splint application/care. Findings include: - R7's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the resident had a diagnosis that included unspecified pain. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident was totally dependent on two or more staff for all cares, except eating which R7 performed independently. The resident no special treatments or therapies. The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Functional / Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 09/02/22, documented the resident had a cerebrovascular accident ([stroke-CVA] sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 23 residents with 12 residents sampled. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plans for two residents, Resident (R)9 and R18, regarding discontinued medications. Findings included: - R9's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD - a serious mood disorder involving one or more episodes of intense psychological depression or loss of interest or pleasure that lasts two or more weeks). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of four, indicating severely impaired cognition. The resident had verbal behaviors towards others that occurred one to three days during the seven-day look-back period. R9 received an antidepressant (a class of medication used to treat mood disorders and relieve symptoms of depression) daily during the seven-day look-back period. The Quarterly MDS dated 05/18/23 documents a BIMS of four. R9 received an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 23 residents with 12 residents selected for review, which included one resident sampled for accidents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment when staff operated a mechanical lift with only one staff member present for Resident (R)7. This placed R7 at increased risk for falls and potential for injury from falls. Findings include: - R7's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the resident had a diagnosis that included unspecified pain. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident was totally dependent on two or more staff for all cares, except eating, which R7 performed independently. The resident did not receive special treatments or therapies. The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Functional / Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 09/02/22, documented the resident cerebrovascular accident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 23 residents with 12 residents included in the sample, that included one resident reviewed for urinary catheter. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary services to decrease the risk of a urinary tract infection when the staff failed to ensure Resident (R) 10's urinary catheter drainage bag did not come in direct contact with the floor. In addition, the facility failed to provide necessary infection control techniques, related to R16's perineal care, when staff failed to change gloves during incontinence cares. Findings included: - R 10's signed physician orders dated 07/31/23 revealed the following diagnoses that included neuromuscular disorder of the bladder (dysfunction of the urinary bladder caused by a lesion of the nervous system) and Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed then resident rarely/never…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 24 residents with 12 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the dignity of four residents when facility staff stood over resident's while assisting the residents to eat during the breakfast meal. (Resident (R) 16, R18, R7, and R13). Findings included: - Observation on 09/21/21 at 08:00 AM revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C stood beside R18, and R13 while she provided eating assistance to R13 and R18, during the morning meal. Observation on 09/21/21 at 08:05 AM revealed Licensed Nurse (LN) B provided eating assistance in the dining room for two residents with their meal. The LN B stood to the side of R16 and provided the resident bites of food and then stood next to R7, without sitting beside or conversing with the residents. Interview on 09/21/21 at 08:10 AM CNA C reported she did not sit beside the residents in the dining room, when she provided eating assistance. Interview on 09/21/21 at 08:19 AM LN B reported she stood by the resident when she provided eating assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 24 residents with 12 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to revise Resident (R) 8's care plan with new fall interventions after each of four falls experienced by R8 in the last year. Findings included: - R8's signed Physician Orders dated 09/07/21 revealed the following diagnoses: Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), hallucinations (sensing things while awake that appear to be real, but the mind created), and anemia (condition without enough healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues). The Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment, required total assistance of two staff with daily cares, and no falls documented. The resident received scheduled and as needed pain medication and received antipsychotic and antidepressant medications daily in the seven day look back…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 24 residents with 12 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for Resident (R) 8 by the failure to determine causal factors and develop interventions to prevent further falls after each of four falls experienced by R8 in the last year. Findings included: - R8's signed Physician Orders dated 09/07/21 revealed the following diagnoses: Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), hallucinations (sensing things while awake that appear to be real, but the mind created), and anemia (condition without enough healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues). The Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment, required total assistance of two staff with daily cares, and no falls documented. The resident received scheduled and as needed pain medication and received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 24 residents, with 12 residents in the sample, and one resident reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's oxygen (O2) tubing and cannula remained sanitary when facility staff failed to store the O2 tubing and cannula in a pouch on the concentrator when not in use, change out Resident (R) 10's oxygen (O2) tubing per physician orders, and did not provide a humidifier bottle for her oxygen concentrator. Findings included: - R10's signed Physician Orders dated 07/05/21 revealed the following diagnoses: congestive heart failure (CHF, a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), and coronary artery disease (any abnormal condition characterized by dysfunction of the heart and blood vessels) The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R10 received O2 therapy. Review of the Care Plan dated 07/09/21 included R10 received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in KS
CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 17E445. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.