Tallgrass Healthcare Campus
1417 W Ash St, Junction City, KS 66441 · For profit - Partnership · 100 certified beds · (785) 762-2162 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (20) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $13,995 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-13)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.5% | 17.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.8% | 4.9% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 1.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.7% | 2.9% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.9% | 6.5% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.5% | 4.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.3% | 16.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.7% | 23.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.3% | 4.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.5% | 22.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.5% | 18.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.9% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.0% | 73.8% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 15.5% | 22.4% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.5% | 11.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.98 | 1.80 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.24 | 2.13 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 102 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 58.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.8%CMS range 42.9–60.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 7.5–16.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 58.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 56.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 46.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.3%CMS range 5.0–15.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.70 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 70.1 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2025-11-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 66 residents, with three residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to protect Resident (R) 2, a cognitively impaired female, from sexual abuse. On 11/12/25 at 01:40 PM, staff found R2, who had severe cognitive impairment, was unable to consent to sexual relations, and had a history of wandering, in R1's room on his bed. R1, who had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (cognitively intact) and a history of sexual behaviors, performed oral sex on R2. Staff separated the residents and placed R2 on one-to-one observation. This deficient practice placed R2 and other cognitively impaired female residents in Immediate Jeopardy.Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of lymphedema (swelling caused by accumulation of lymph), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to immediately implement effective measures to prevent further potential abuse or mistreatment of residents. After Resident (R) 1 made an allegation of abuse which named a facility staff member as the alleged perpetrator, the facility did not immediately suspend the staff member (AP), which allowed the AP to have further access to the alleged victim and/or other vulnerable residents. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (a major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness).R1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R1 required substantial/maximal staff assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs). R1's Care Plan, revised 04/22/2026, documented R1 reported feeling uncomfortable during personal care and expressed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The facility had two medication rooms and three medication carts. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff locked and secured medications while away from the medication cart on the Sunshine Hall. This placed residents at risk for accidental ingestion of medication and adverse reactions.Findings included:- On 08/04/25 at 09:04 AM, on Sunshine Hall, the nurse's medication cart located beside the nurse's desk was found unattended and unlocked. At 09:05 AM, Administrative Nurse E walked down the hall to the medication cart and noticed it was unlocked. Administrative Nurse E locked the cart and stood beside the cart until Licensed Nurse (LN) I returned to her cart.On 08/04/25 at 09:07 AM, Administrative Nurse E stated to LN I, upon her return to her medication cart, that her cart should remain locked any time she was away from the cart. On 08/06/25 at 09:34 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated that all medication carts and rooms should remain locked when not in use or when staff walked away from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 62 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with one reviewed for discharge. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO- a public official who works to resolve resident issues in nursing facilities) of Resident (R) 1 and R67's. The facility also failed to develop a discharge summary that included a recapitulation (a concise summary of the resident's stay and course of treatment in the facility) of the resident's stay for R67's unplanned discharge. This placed the residents at risk for uninformed care choices and impaired rights.Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of sepsis (a life-threatening systemic reaction that develops due to infections that cause inflammation throughout the entire body), Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The sample included 16 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 9's comprehensive care plan was revised with information about his dialysis (a procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood). This deficient practice placed R9 at risk for missed dialysis visits and complications related to dialysis.Findings included:- R9's EMR documented diagnoses of end-stage renal disease (ESRD- a terminal disease of the kidneys) and dependence on renal dialysis.R9's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 04/01/25 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. R9 had functional limitation in range of motion impairment on both lower extremities. R9 used a walker and a wheelchair to assist with his mobility. R9 required substantial staff assistance with toileting and was dependent on staff for bathing. R9 was on a dialysis program.R9's Functional Abilities Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 04/01/25 documented he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The sample included 16 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 2's physician ordered fluid restriction was followed by staff. This placed R2 at risk of fluid overload and possible complications.Findings included:- R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), respiratory failure (a condition where the lungs cannot adequately exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide between the blood and the air, leading to insufficient oxygen or excessive carbon dioxide in the bloodstream), and hypertension (HTN- elevated blood pressure).R2's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 01/31/25 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. R2 used a wheelchair to assist with mobility. R2 had a functional limitation in the range of motion with impairment on one side of her lower extremity. R2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The sample included 16 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 9's dialysis (a procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood) physician order was in his orders of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR). This deficient practice placed R9 at risk for missed dialysis visits and complications related to dialysis.Findings included:- R9's EMR documented diagnoses of end-stage renal disease (ESRD- a terminal disease of the kidneys), and dependence on renal dialysis.R9's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 04/01/25 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. R9 had a functional limitation in the range of motion impairment on both lower extremities. R9 used a walker and a wheelchair to assist with his mobility. R9 required substantial staff assistance with toileting and was dependent on staff for bathing. R9 was on a dialysis program.R9's Functional Abilities Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 62 residents. The sample included 16 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified Resident (R) 32's as-needed antianxiety (a class of medications that calm and relax people) without a stop date and R2's fluid restriction parameter monitoring with the use of a diuretic (a medication to promote the formation and excretion of urine). This placed the residents at risk for inappropriate and/or unnecessary medication.Finding included:- R32's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of severe protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), non-pressure chronic ulcer of the left lower leg, paralytic syndrome (loss of muscle function leading to weakness or inability to move), anemia (an inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues), disorder of arteries,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 62 residents. The sample included 16 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain a stop date for Resident (R) 32's as-needed (PRN) antianxiety (a class of medications that calm and relax people) lorazepam, which placed R32 at risk of receiving unnecessary medication.Findings included:- R32's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of severe protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), non-pressure chronic ulcer of the left lower leg, paralytic syndrome (loss of muscle function leading to weakness or inability to move), anemia (an inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues), disorder of arteries, peripheral vascular disease (PVD- slow and progressive circulation disorder causing narrowing, blockage, or spasms in a blood vessel), diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 62 residents. The sample included 16 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to include a hospice (a program that gives special care to people who are near the end of life) plan of care that outlined visit frequency, medications, medical equipment, and the resident representative's preference for Resident (R) 4 and R32. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk of not receiving resident-directed end-of-life care.Findings included:- R4’s Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body), cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), chronic kidney disease (a condition where the kidneys are damaged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 62 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when staff failed to provide enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) for Resident (R) 17. The facility staff failed to change gloves when providing incontinent care for R17. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for possible exposure to infection.Findings included:- On 08/04/25 at 03:30 PM, observation revealed no EBP signage or personal protective equipment (PPE) outside or inside R17's room.On 08/04/25 at 03:34 PM, R17 sat in a chair in the living room area between all halls. Licensed Nurse (LN) F and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M assisted R17 using a walker and a gait belt to R17's room. LN F asked the resident if she could provide wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 9 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 63 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement a water management program for Legionella disease (Legionella is a bacterium spread through mist, such as air-conditioning units in large buildings. Adults over the age of 50 and people with weak immune systems, chronic lung disease or heavy tobacco use are most at risk of developing a pneumonia caused by Legionella). This deficient practice placed the residents at increased risk of infectious disease. Findings included: - On 11/20/23 at 12:51 PM Maintenance Staff U stated he was not aware of the need for a water management system for the prevention of Legionella. Maintenance Staff U stated the facility drained the hot water tanks every couple of months to prevent the build of scale. On 11/20/23 at 01:26 PM, Administrative Staff A reported the facility did not have tanks with standing water and the city ran tests on a daily basis and would report to the facility if there were any issues. The facility's Water Management Policy dated 2023 documented the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 63 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food in one of two dining rooms in a sanitary manner. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for food borne illness. Findings included: - On 11/13/23 at 11:58 AM, observation in the facility's main dining room revealed Dietary Staff (DS) CC dropped the lid from a soda bottle, picked it up from the floor, and did not wash her hands before obtaining and placing an unwrapped straw in a resident's glass. Observation at 12:16 PM revealed DS CC touched a resident on the shoulder, cut up his food, then handled another resident's silverware, to cut up his food, without washing or sanitizing her hands. DS CC then went to another table and accepted a resident's silverware from her and cut up her food without handwashing or using sanitizer. On 11/20/23 at 10:32 AM, DS BB verified staff were to wash their hands after picking up items from the floor and before handling resident straws. She stated staff should wash their hands or use hand sanitizer between handling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 63 residents. The sample included 16 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)5 and R20, or their representative, the completed Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notices (ABN) form 10055 which included the cost to continue services. This placed the resident at risk of uninformed decisions about their skilled services. Findings included: - The Medicare ABN form 10055 informed the beneficiary that Medicare may not pay for future skilled therapy services. The form included an option for the beneficiary to receive specific services listed, and bill Medicare for an official decision on payment. The form stated 1) I understand if Medicare does not pay, I will be responsible for payment, but can make an appeal to Medicare, (2) receive therapy listed, but do not bill Medicare, I am responsible for payment for services, (3) I do not want the listed services. Review of the form 10055 the facility provided to R5 revealed the form lacked the cost of continued service. The resident's skilled services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 63 residents. The sample included 16 residents with one reviewed for dental care. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to facilitate the necessary dental care services for Resident (R) 26. This placed R26 at risk for pain, weight loss, and worsening dental issues. Findings included: - R26's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis one side of the body), hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), and gastroesophageal reflux (GERD-backflow of stomach contents to the esophagus). R26's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R26 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The assessment revealed R26 required staff to help with more than half the effort for oral hygiene. R26's Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 08/16/23, recorded R26 had a history of poor dental care. R26 denied having a dentist and denied pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 61 residents. The sample included 16 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the 61 residents who resided in the facility and received their food from the facility kitchen, when the facility failed to ensure clean and sanitary food prep areas, and failed to dispose of expired food items. This placed the 61 residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - On 04/28/22 at 09:02 AM, observation in the kitchen revealed the following: The kitchen ceiling had three areas of peeling paint, one approximately 12 inches (jn) x 12 in and two with approximately 8 in diameter, above the three-compartment sink. An area of bubbling paint, approximately 8 in x 12 in above the preparation table. Two of 28 fluorescent lights with gray fuzzy particles. Three box air/heat units on the ceiling with grease coated filters and lint on the pipes. The cord to the electrical box, on the ceiling, over the taller preparation table,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 61 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with five reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide consistent bathing services for three sampled residents, Resident (R) 38, R49, and R9 . This placed the residents at risk for complications related to poor hygiene. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R38 recorded diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), cognitive decline (memory loss), and chronic kidney disease (kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood the way they should). R38's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. The MDS documented R38 required extensive assistance of one staff for bathing. The ADL Care Plan, dated 03/14/22, documented R38 preferred a whirlpool for bathing and directed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-04 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 61 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor and provide the physician ordered interventions for bowel management for one sampled resident, Resident (R) 38. This placed the resident at risk for constipation and decline. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R38 recorded diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), cognitive decline (memory loss), chronic kidney disease (kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood the way they should) and constipation (difficulty passing stools). R38's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had severely impaired cognition, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene, and was always incontinent of bowel. The Pain Care Plan, dated 03/14/22, directed staff to monitor and document for side effects of pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 61 residents. The sample included 16 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure one of six residents reviewed during medication administration pass, remained free of medication error. This placed the resident at risk for adverse reaction from the medication. Findings included: - Resident (R) 39's Physician Order Sheet, dated 04/18/22, recorded diagnoses of dementia with behavioral disturbances (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion with agitation including verbal and physical aggression, wandering and hoarding), hallucinations (sensing things while awake that appear to be real, but the mind created), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), and epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures). R39's Physician Order, dated 04/12/22 instructed staff to administer, Pristique (antidepressant) ER (extended release), 25 milligrams (mg) 1 tablet a day, Potassium Chloride (potassium supplement) ER, 10 milliequivalents (mEq) 1 tablet a day, and Depakote…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 61 residents. The sample included 16 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label Resident (R) 36's insulin (hormone which allows cells throughout the body to uptake glucose) pen with the opened and expiration date, and discard expired stock medications on one of three medication carts. This placed the residents at risk for ineffective medications. Findings included: -On 05/02/22 at 01:30 PM, observation of the Sunshine medication cart, revealed the following: R36's Lantus (long acting insulin) flex pen lacked a date opened, and a date of expiration. One bottle of Thiamin (Vitamin B1), 100 milligrams (mg), 100 count tablets, expired 03/22. On 05/02/22 at 01:35 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G, verified the stock medication in the Sunshine cart had expired, the nurses are to look at the bottles before administering the medications to the residents, and discard expired medications. LN G stated the nurses dated the insulin pens/vials when opened and expired and discarded expired medications. The facility's Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$13,995 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $13,995 — penalty dated 2025-11-13
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BROOKS, PHILIP | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 40% | since 11/01/2007 |
| WARREN, BRIAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 60% | since 11/01/2007 |
| SHANDY, TIMOTHY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 11/01/2007 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $796K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175126. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.