No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Kearny County Hospital Ltcu

607 Court Pl, Lakin, KS 67860 · Government - County · 40 certified beds · (620) 355-7836 Medicaid only — no Medicare

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$69,565 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $69,565 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-20)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
607 Court Pl · (620) 355-7836 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
500 Thorpe St · (620) 355-7712 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
710 Tampa St · (620) 355-7399 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1204 Kendall Ave · (620) 355-6252 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.0%17.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.6%4.9%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.3%1.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.8%2.9%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.8%6.5%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.1%4.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.1%16.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.1%23.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%4.4%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control38.4%22.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.6%18.1%17.1%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.401.801.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.522.131.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

1.22
RN hours/ resident / day
0.34
LPN hours/ resident / day
4.25
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.81
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.09
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 19.4 residents a day — about 48% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.22 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.25 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.11 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.27 to 1.09 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

33
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-10-24)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2022-12-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

43 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2021-05-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 28 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure safe water temperatures in areas accessible to residents which had the potential to cause serious burns from extremely hot water temperatures in excess of 140 degrees Fahrenheit (F) (acceptable water temperature 120 F or below with a 3 degree variance + or -). The facility failed to monitor and document water temperatures accessible to residents in their personal restroom sink or sinks accessible in public areas, which placed residents who lived on one of two halls in the facility at risk for burns and in immediate jeopardy. Findings included: - Observations during the screening process of the resurvey on 05/24/21 revealed water temperatures greater than 140 F in one sink located in one of two Whirlpool rooms with a temperature of 141.2 F as well as the following resident rooms: 10:45 AM (room [ROOM NUMBER]) 142.1 F 11:00 AM (room [ROOM NUMBER]) 140.3 F 11:28 AM (room [ROOM NUMBER]) 141.3 F…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 25 residents with 12 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify, implement, and reevaluate fall prevention interventions to prevent falls for six residents. Resident (R) 21 experienced a fall which resulted in multiple sinus fractures (broken bone) and R18's fall resulted in a hip fracture, which required hospitalization and surgery. Additionally, the facility failed to implement new interventions to prevent falls for R12, R17, R20 and R23, placing the residents at risk for falls with injury. Findings included: - The Electronic Health Records (EHR) documented R21 had the following diagnoses that included dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), degenerative arthritis (a chronic condition that causes cartilage in the joints to break down over time) of bilateral (both sides) knees and bipolar disorder (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-24 · tag F0636 — widespread
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 25 residents. The sample included 12 residents reviewed for person-centered care plan development. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for three residents, Resident (R) 74 related to psychotropic (any class of medications that alter mood or thought) medication use, opioid (a class of medications used to treat moderate to severe pain) medication use, diuretic (a class of medication to promote the formation and excretion of urine) medication use and nebulized (a device which changes liquid medication into a mist easily inhaled into the lungs) medication use. R124's Care plan lacked interventions related to the performance (or lack thereof) for activities of daily living (ADLs - activities such as walking, grooming, toileting, dressing and eating, etc.), psychotropic medication use, visual function, abnormal behaviors, nutritional status, and pain. R20's care plan lacked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-24 · tag F0641 — widespread
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - R74's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid) and Alzheimer's disease (a progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure) The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The assessment documented R74 utilized a walker and/or a wheelchair for locomotion. The assessment documented the resident received antianxiety (a class of medications that calm and relax people) medications, antidepressant (a class of medications used to treat mood disorders) medications, diuretic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-24 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 25 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage eight hours a day, seven days a week, placing all residents who reside at the facility at risk of lack of assessments and inappropriate care. Findings included: - Upon review of Payroll Based Journal (PBJ- a required detail information submitted by nursing homes of staffing information that is required by the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS]) the facility reported a lack of consecutive eight-hour RN coverage for 39 days from July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024. Review of the Fiscal Year FY Quarter 4 2023 (July 1 - September 30, 2023), the following days lacked an RN for consecutive eight-hour coverage: 08/16/23, 08/17/23, 08/22/23, 09/04/23, 09/09/23, 09/10/23, 09/23/23 and 09/24/23. Review of the FY Quarter 1 2024 (October 1 - December 31, 2023), the following days lacked an RN for consecutive eight-hour coverage: 10/07/23, 10/21/23,11/04/23, 11/18/23, 11/19/23, 11/23/23, 12/02/23, 12/03/23, 12/16/23, 12/26/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 25 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner to prevent possible food-borne illness to the residents of the facility. Findings included: On 10/21/24 at 02:37 PM during an initial tour of the main kitchen and refrigerator storage areas with Dietary Staff BB, the following areas of concern were observed: One unsealed/uncovered tray fruit-gelatin dessert located in the refrigerator. One uncovered, extra-large, metal steam container full of sandwich baggies, which contained unidentifiable food and lacked a date or label located in the freezer. One unsealed bag of hotdogs, without a date or label and located in the freezer. One unsealed bag of pepperoni, without a date or label and located in the freezer. One unsealed bag of frozen fish patties, without a date or label and located in the freezer. One sealed container of bulk breadcrumbs without a date or label. Seven sealed plastic containers of cereal with a use by date of 05/29/24, no opened date documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-24 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 25 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and/or dispose of garbage and refuse properly, and in a sanitary condition, ensuring the lids were down to cover the disposed waste and prevent the potential harboring/feeding of pests. Findings included: - Initial tour of the outside trash dumpsters on 10/21/24 at 02:37 PM with Dietary Manager BB, revealed two out of the seven dumpsters had the lids in the open position. On 10/21/24 at 02:37 PM, Dietary Manager BB, revealed she was not aware of the requirement to have trash covered. On 10/23/24 at 10:48 AM, Administrative Nurse D, stated she was unaware that dumpsters fell under dietary responsibility and believed the city was responsible for the conditions, repairs, and maintenance the dumpsters required. The facility's policy Waste Disposal dated 09/2019 revealed that all waste would be kept covered unless in production and any leaks, creaks or dents in the trash can or to the lid would be reported to the production manager. The facility failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-24 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 25 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide administrative services in a manner to effectively and efficiently use resources to attain/maintain each resident's highest physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, for all 25 residents that resided in the facility. Findings included: The facility failed to provide Resident (R) 17 care in a dignified manner when it referred to the table where the resident was placed as a feeder table in the electronic charting. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being. (See F550). The facility failed to ensure R124, R20, R21, R15, and R74 had accurate advanced directives completed. This deficient practice had the potential to lead to uncommunicated needs regarding the resident's choice in end-of-life care. (See F578). The facility failed to promote a clean homelike environment for five residents R2, R8, R23, R74 and R124. These deficient practices had the potential to spread possible infections to the residents in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-24 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 25 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a Payroll Based Journal (PBJ- a required detail information submitted by nursing homes of staffing information that is required by the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS]) reports for Registered Nurse (RN) coverage eight hours a day, seven days a week and failed to accurately complete a PBJ report for Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 hours/day. Which placed all residents who reside at the facility at risk of lack of assessments and inappropriate care. Findings included: - Review of the Fiscal Year FY Quarter 4 2023 (July 1 - September 30), the following days lacked an RN for consecutive eight-hour coverage: 08/16/23 (WE), 08/17/23 (TH), 08/22/23 (TU), 09/04/23 (MO), 09/09/23 (SA), 09/10/23 (SU), 09/23/23 (SA) and 09/24/23 (SU). Review of the FY Quarter 1 2024 (October 1 - December 31), the following days lacked an RN for consecutive eight-hour coverage: 10/07/23 (SA), 10/21/23 (SA),11/04/23 (SA), 11/18/23 (SA), 11/19/23 (SU), 11/23/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 25 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) program (a management process for long-term care (LTC) facilities that ensures care practices are consistently applied and quality standards are met) conducted at least one performance improvement project annually, that focused on high-risk or problem prone areas, identified by the facility, through data collection and analysis. This failure has the potential to affect all 25 residents. Findings included: - On 10/24/24 at 12:03 PM, Administrative Nurse D reported the required members do meet at least quarterly for the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. Administrative Nurse D reported that no annual performance improvement project had been conducted for the facility and she stated, It is a work in progress. The facility's policy Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement dated 08/2024, documented the facility strives, on continuous basis, to respond to identified needs of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 25 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed transport clean linens in a method to protect clean linens from dust or soiling when staff left the clean linen cart uncovered during transport. The facility further failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to the maintaining an annually reviewed Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) (a practical, evidence-based approach preventing patients and health workers from being harmed by avoidable infections). The facility staff failed to utilize enhanced barrier precautions (a set of infection control measures that use gowns and gloves to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes) (EBP) when providing catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid) care and wound care on Resident (R) 23. The facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of care for R8, R18…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-24 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 25 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff adhered to the principles of antibiotic stewardship through monitoring for the appropriate use of antibiotics prescribed for residents to prevent antibiotic resistance and spread of multidrug resistant organisms within the facility. Findings included: - Interview, on 10/24/24 at 10:20 AM, with Administrative Nurse D reported that a resident who received an order for an antibiotic would have finished the medication before she had time to evaluate the antibiotic, labs, and residents' Electronic Health Record (EHR). Administrative Nurse D reported that the hospitals EHR does not communicate with the facilities' EHR and that would make it difficult to assure appropriate use of antibiotics. She reported the provider would give and order for an antibiotic prior to receiving the culture and sensitivity report back and the resident would not be on the correct antibiotic when report was received as it was not a susceptible antibiotic. Additionally, the provider is not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-24 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 25 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to designate a qualified Infection Preventionist (IP), who had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control, to be responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP). This failure has the potential to affect all 25 residents. Findings included: - During an interview on 10/22/24 at 09:15 AM, Administrative Staff A revealed the facility did not employ a qualified IP. Administrative Staff A reported the IP in the hospital would answer questions for Administrative Nurse D and Administrative Nurse E when needed. Administrative Staff A reported that neither Administrative Nurse D nor Administrative Nurse E have completed an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP). During an interview on 10/24/24 at 10:20 AM, Administrative Nurse D confirmed she had not started a IPCP at this time. The facility's policy Infection Prevention Plan dated 05/2021, documented the designated IP would be responsible for the day-to-day functions of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-24 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 25 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of the five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) sampled lacked the required 12 hours per year in-service training. This placed the residents at risk for decreased quality of life and/or inadequate care. Findings included: - On 10/24/24 at 10:00 AM, review of training records for five CNAs employed by the facility for more than one year revealed four CNAs had less than 12 hours of documented in-service training for the previous 12 months as follows: CNA N had 10 hours and 38 minutes of documented training. CNA R had nine hours and 32 minutes of documented training. CNA Y had 10 hours and six minutes of documented training. Social Services Designee (SSD)/CNA X had nine hours and 24 minutes of documented training. On 10/24/24 at 10:00 AM, Administrative Staff A confirmed that CNAs were required to have 12 hours of training annually and stated there were no records of additional training for those CNAs. The facility did not provide a policy related to CNA continuing education…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 25 residents, with 12 residents sampled and reviewed for advanced directives (a written document, which indicates the medical decisions for health care professionals when the person could not make their own decisions). Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure five resident's advanced directives were thoroughly completed. Resident (R)124 had a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR- or no code, a legal document that means the person does not desire cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR is an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when the heart stops beating] in the event of cardiac arrest) form that was only located in the Code Status binder at nurse's station. However, the electronic health record (EHR) lacked a DNR order and lacked the uploaded DNR document for R124. Additionally, R15 had no order for a DNR in the EHR. R21 and R20 had a durable power of attorney (DPOA- legal document that named a person to make healthcare decisions when the resident was no longer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 25 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to promote a clean homelike environment for five residents. Resident (8) had a chair seat repaired with duct tape and R124 had a bureau drawer, which had lacked part of the veneer on the drawer facing and the remaining veneer was loose and brittle. Additionally, R2, R74, R23 and R124 had fall mats, which were cracked and had worn down surfaces all that were identified as non-cleanable surfaces and a non-home-like environment. These deficient practices had the potential to spread possible infections to the residents in the facility. Findings included: During an observation on 10/23/24 at 01:21 PM. R124 had a fall mat on her floor in her room, which had several cracks, tears and worn-down surfaces. During an interview on 10/24/24 at 08:38 AM, Housekeeping Staff II reported she would clean the fall mats with disinfectant cleaner and that it was not her job to report the fall mat that were worn down. Housekeeping Staff II reported she would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 25 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three reviewed for discharge. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide written notice to the resident or resident representative for facility-initiated transfers for Residents (R)18, R12, and R23 when they transferred to the hospital. The facility also failed to send a copy of the notice to the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO - a public official who works to resolve resident issues in nursing facilities) of R18, R12, or R23's discharge. This placed the residents at risk of uninformed care choices. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) census log for R18 revealed a discharge from the facility to a hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The EHR lacked documentation related to written notification of the resident or resident's representative or notification of the LTCO related to this discharge/transfer. Review of the EHR census log…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 25 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three reviewed for discharge. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a written bed hold policy notice to Residents (R)18, R12, and R23, or the resident's representatives, when they transferred to the hospital. This deficient practice had the risk of impaired ability to return to the facility and to the previous room for R18, R12 and R23. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) census log for R18 revealed a discharge from the facility to a hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The EHR lacked documentation related to written notification of the resident or resident's representative or notification of the LTCO related to this discharge/transfer. Review of the EHR census log for R12 revealed a discharge from the facility to a hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The EHR lacked documentation related to written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 25 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in a timely manner for eight residents, Resident (R) 8, R10, R12, R17, R18, R19, R20 and R21. This placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and inaccurate assessments. Findings included: - During the onsite annual survey, the surveyor identified a concern regarding the lack of quarterly MDS assessments completed in a timely manner for eight residents. Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) on 10/21/24 revealed the following quarterly MDS noted concerns for the following eight residents: R8's EHR recorded a quarterly MDS, dated [DATE]. R8's EMR recorded the quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], was completed on 09/26/24 and submitted on 09/26/24. (11 days later) R10's EHR recorded a quarterly MDS, dated [DATE]. R10's EMR recorded the quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], was completed on 09/26/24 and submitted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 25 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in a timely manner for ten residents. Resident (R)8, R10, R12, R15, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21 and R124. This placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and inaccurate assessments. Findings included: - During the onsite annual survey, the surveyor identified a concern regarding the lack of comprehensive MDS assessments completed in a timely manner for ten residents. Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) on 10/21/24 revealed the following comprehensive MDS noted concerns for the following 10 residents: R8's EHR recorded a comprehensive MDS, dated [DATE]. R8's EMR recorded an Annual MDS, dated [DATE], was completed on 08/13/24 and submitted on 08/14/24. (167 days later) R10's EHR recorded a comprehensive MDS, dated [DATE]. R10's EMR recorded an Annual MDS, dated [DATE], was completed on 05/10/24 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 25 residents, which included 12 residents sampled. Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plans with appropriate interventions for eight of the sampled residents; R23 related to treatment of an area of pressure ulcer/injury and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - a set of infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact cares) related to wound care and urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid) care; R19, R15, R20, R21, R17, R12 and R18 related to development and implementation of appropriate interventions to prevent multiple falls. These deficient practices had the potential to result in uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for Resident (R)18 included diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 25 residents with 12 residents selected for review which included five residents reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards for four residents. The facility failed to ensure staff properly cleaned and stored the nebulizer (a device for administering inhaled medications) for Resident (R)12, R8, and R74. The facility failed to ensure R18's room remained free of used nebulizer equipment (from a prior discharged resident) not required for R18's medical care. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the nasal cannula (a device to deliver low-concentration, low-pressure supplemental oxygen) were stored appropriately, sanitarily, when not in use for R12 and R8. These deficient practices had the potential to have a negative impact on the resident's physical well-being and at risk of respiratory infection. Findings included: - During an observation on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility census totaled 25 residents on two halls and had two medication carts. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff and secured storage of resident medications when observation onsite revealed an unlocked and unattended medication cart, not in the line of vision of the attending staff, containing oral, topical and inhaled medications. This deficient practice placed nine cognitively impaired, independently mobile residents at risk. Findings included: - On 10/22/24/24 at 07:38 AM, observation revealed an unlocked and unattended medication cart that contained oral, topical and inhaled medications in the hall between the dining area and commons area. During an interview on 10/22/24 at 07:38 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S identified the cart as her responsibility and stated the cart should be locked when not attended. CMA S stated the (medication cart) lock would not engage if the drawers were not fully closed, even if the lock appeared engaged. CMA S stated that maintenance had recently replaced the lock. CMA S stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 25 residents with 12 residents sampled. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the pneumococcal vaccine (vaccine designed to prevent pneumonia [inflammation of the lungs which can be debilitating or lethal in the elderly]) consent/declination form to five residents reviewed. (Resident (R) 8,12,18,19 and 124). Additionally, the facility failed to provide a second witness signature on R12 and 18's influenza vaccine (a vaccine designed to prevent influenza [highly contagious viral infection]) consent forms. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) of 2023-2024 for R8, R12 and R19 lacked documentation of the pneumococcal vaccine declination form. Additionally, their EHR lacked documentation of the historical pneumococcal vaccine immunization record. R18 and 124 lacked any documentation for consent/declination of pneumococcal vaccine. Review of the EHR of 2024 - 2025 for R8,12,18,19 and 124 lacked required documentation of influenza vaccine. During an interview on 10/24/24 at 10:15 AM, Administrative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 25 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner when it charted in the medical record that Resident (R)17 was placed at the feeder table. The facility did not honor resident's rights related to personal food preferences and food choices for Resident (R)124. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed Resident (R)17 had the following diagnoses: pulmonary fibrosis (a process that causes lung scarring, in which fibrotic tissue blocks the movement of oxygen into the bloodstream and low oxygen levels), psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality perception), spinal stenosis (degenerative condition of the spine that could cause weakness and loss of use of extremities), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 25 residents with 12 residents sampled that included two residents reviewed for baseline care plan. Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered baseline care plan for Resident (R) 74 and R124. This deficient practice had the potential to lead to uncommunicated needs. Findings included: - The Electronic Health Record (EHR) census for Resident (R) 74 revealed that R74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and the EHR lacked documentation that a baseline care plan was created. Further, R74's permanent person-centered comprehensive care plan was completed on 10/15/24 (15 days after the admission). The EHR census log for R124 revealed R124 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and the EHR lacked documentation that a baseline care plan was created. R124's permanent person-centered comprehensive care plan was created on 09/17/24 but lacked initial goals based on admission orders, physician's orders, therapy services, social…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 25 residents. The sample included 12 residents reviewed for person-centered care plan development. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for three residents, Resident (R) 74 related to psychotropic (any class of medications that alter mood or thought) medication use, opioid (a class of medications used to treat moderate to severe pain) medication use, diuretic (a class of medication to promote the formation and excretion of urine) medication use and nebulized (a device which changes liquid medication into a mist easily inhaled into the lungs) medication use. R124's Care plan lacked interventions related to the performance (or lack thereof) for activities of daily living (ADLs - activities such as walking, grooming, toileting, dressing and eating, etc.), psychotropic medication use, visual function, abnormal behaviors, nutritional status, and pain. R20's care plan lacked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 25 residents with 12 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess the nutritional status of cognitively impaired Resident (R)124 on admission, placing the resident at risk for nutritional deficits. Findings included: - Resident (R) 124's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses, which included dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and depression. The 09/29/24 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of ten, indicating moderately impaired cognition. R124 had a total mood severity score of one, indicating none to minimal depression and she had one behavior noted she yelled at staff. R124 required set up for eating, had broken or loose fitting dentures, and was dependent on a wheelchair for mobility. The 09/29/24 Nutritional Status Care Area Assessment (CAA) for R124 documented staff did not have an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 25 residents with 12 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician documented and conducted the in person admission visit as required for Resident (R)124. Findings included: - Resident (R)124's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses, which included dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and depression. The 09/29/24 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of ten, indicating moderately impaired cognition. R124 had a total mood severity score of one, indicating none to minimal depression and she had one behavior noted she yelled at staff. R124 required set up for eating and was dependent on a wheelchair mobility. R124 had impairment noted to one upper and lower side of her body. The 09/29/24 admission MDS for R124 had no date for completion of the MDS, the CAA or submission record as of 10/21/24.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 25 residents. The sample included 12 residents with the residents reviewed for dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) care services. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to support Residents (R)19 and R124 and implement care planned interventions to address dementia care needs. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for impaired ability to achieve and/or maintain their highest practicable level of functioning and wellbeing. The facility failed to implement individualized interventions, as well as revise the care plan accordingly, to address individualized interventions related to the residents symptomology and rate of progression as evidenced by observation, record review, and/or interview. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R) 19's Electronic Health Record (EHR) included diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), insomnia (inability to sleep), Alzheimer's disease, (progressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 25 residents. The sample included 12 residents with six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to act upon the pharmacist's monthly medication review (MRR) on 06/30/24 for Resident (R)18. The deficient practice had the potential to lead to the residents receiving unnecessary mediations. - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for Resident (R)18 included diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), epilepsy (a brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures), frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder (a brain disease that affects behavior, language and movement abilities), and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). The 04/22/24 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 08/16/24, documented that the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment could not be completed, and the staff assessed R18 to have severely impaired cognition. The assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 25 residents. The sample included 12 residents with six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)74's medication regimen remained free of as needed (PRN) psychotropic (any class of medications that alters mood or thought) medication that lacked the required 14 day stop date or clinical rationale for continued use beyond the initial 14 days. This deficient practice had the potential to lead to the resident receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings Included: - R74's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), and Alzheimer's disease (a progressive mental deterioration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 25 residents with 12 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate a resident's preferences related to dietary preferences for one Resident (R)124. Findings included: - Resident (R) 124's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses, which included dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and depression. The 09/29/24 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of ten, indicating moderately impaired cognition. R124 had a total mood severity score of one, indicating none to minimal depression and she had one behavior noted she yelled at staff. R124 required set up for eating and was dependent on a wheelchair mobility. R124 had impairment noted to one upper and lower side of her body. The 09/29/24 Nutritional Status Care Area Assessment (CAA) R124 did not have an issue with her nutrition. The 10/21/24 Care Plan lacked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 29 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective Quality Assessment and Assurance ([QAA] facility meetings to identify issues with care and services in the facility and develop action plans to correct the concerns) program to ensure the problems related to resident care identified and action plans developed through the QAA program to address those concerns. This had the potential to affect all residents. Findings included: - The facility failed to provide activity of daily living (ADL's) for Resident (R)15, related to lack of nail care on her long fingernails that dug into the palm of her left hand. The facility failed to provide hand splinting devices for contractures, for R2 and R15. The Consulting Pharmacist failed to report irregularities of inappropriate diagnosis for antipsychotic medication Seroquel, for R27. The facility failed to ensure antipsychotic medications had an appropriate diagnosis for R27. The facility failed to ensure facility staff hand hygiene and infection control practices…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-12-07 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 29 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee meetings with the required members present that included the Director of Nursing Services, the Medical Director, the Nursing home administrator, owner, board member, or other individual in a leadership role, the Infection Preventionist and two other staff members, when the facility did not have at least quarterly meetings. This had the potential to affect all residents. Findings included: - On 12/05/22 at 01:30 PM, Administrative Nurse D produced sign- in sheets for quarterly QA meetings from January 2021 through December 2022. The facility lacked documentation for the required meetings for the year 2022. On 12/07/22 at 03:35 PM Administrative Nurse D, confirmed the facility had not had QAA quarterly meetings. She stated she had been trying to get them scheduled, and things kept happening to prevent her from scheduling the meetings. The facility's LTC (long term care) Quality Assessment and Assurance Program policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 29 residents, with 12 residents sampled, including one resident sampled for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate nail care and assistance for Resident (R) 15. Findings included: - The 12/05/22 Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented R15 included the following diagnoses: osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain), Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). The 03/01/22 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of seven, indicating severely impaired cognition. R15 required extensive assistance of one staff for all activities of daily living (ADL). R15 had occasional pain at four that did not interfere with sleep or ADL's. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 29 residents, with 12 residents sampled, including two residents sampled for position/mobility. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility with the maximum practicable independence for Resident (R) 15 and R2 by the failure to provide the provider ordered finger separator (device used to stretch and separate the fingers) for R15 and the carrots (hand contracture orthosis) for R2. Findings included: - The 12/05/22 Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented R15 included the following diagnoses: osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain), Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). The 03/01/22 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 29 residents with 12 sampled including two residents sampled for indwelling urinary catheter (tube placed in the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag). Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent possible urinary tract infections for Resident (R) 2 and R7. Findings included: - The 12/05/22 Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented R2 had the following diagnosis: neurogenic bladder (dysfunction of the urinary bladder caused by a lesion of the nervous system). The 10/24/22 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, indicating severely impaired cognition. R2 had an indwelling catheter. The 10/24/22 Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. The 11/30/22 Care Plan documented staff assisted R2 with catheter care every shift and more often as needed. The Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented as of 12/21/21, R2 had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents, including five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported an inadequate indication for use for Resident (R) 27's anti-psychotic (a class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions) medication Seroquel. This failure had the potential of unnecessary antipsychotic medication use and related side effects for R27. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R27 documented diagnosis of dementia with behavioral disturbance (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion and behaviors including agitation, verbal, and physical aggression, wandering and hoarding), frontotemporal dementia (dementia with dramatic changes in personality, socially inappropriateness, and impulsiveness), and depression (a mood disorder that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents, including five residents sampled for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate diagnosis for an antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions) for Resident (R)27's anti-psychotic (a class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions) medication Seroquel. This failure had to potential of unnecessary antipsychotic medication use and related side effects for R27. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R27 documented diagnoses of dementia with behavioral disturbance (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion and behaviors including agitation, verbal, and physical aggression, wandering and hoarding), frontotemporal dementia (dementia with dramatic changes in personality, socially inappropriateness, and impulsiveness),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-05-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 28 residents. The facility had one main kitchen where food was stored and prepared for two dining rooms. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly store food items placed in a refrigerator and dry goods storage room by the failure to ensure food items in opened packages were dated and expired foods were discarded after the expiration date. The facility also failed to ensure staff followed sanitary methods of distributing food to residents. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings included: - During the initial environmental tour of the dietary department on 05/24/21 at 09:15 AM, the following concerns were identified: 1. 20 Hormel Thick & Easy thickened dairy beverages with a Best Used by date of 05/07/21 were found on a rack. 2. Two one-pint cartons of Hi-Land 2% Reduced Fat Milk were found in refrigerator number one with an expiration date of May 20, 2021. 3. Two opened packages of angel hair pasta were found in the dry goods storage room. One package was in an undated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 28 with two residents reviewed for skin conditions (non-pressure related). Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff identified, documented, and followed-up on bruising for Resident (R)9. Findings included: Review of R9's Physician Orders dated 04/01/21 revealed the following diagnoses: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing) and emphysema (long-term, progressive disease of the lungs characterized by shortness of breath). Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. R9 required limited assistance with bed mobility, transfers, walking, and locomotion. R9 required extensive assist with dressing and toilet use. There were no noted skin issues documented, and R9 did not receive an anticoagulant.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-10-24 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 25 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the posted daily nurse staffing sheets included the daily census and nursing hours, as required Findings included: - During observation on 10/23/24 at 03:40 PM, daily staffing sheets hung on the back wall of the nurse's station. The nurse staffing sheet form lacked the total number or actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed staff along with the daily resident census. Review of the Daily Schedule Nursing Hours sheets from 09/24/24 through 10/23/24, revealed the information sheets lacked the total number or actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed staff along with the daily resident census. On 10/24/24 at 11:41 AM, Administrative Staff A and Administrative Nurse D reported they were not aware of a federal requirement to have daily staffing sheets completed containing the required elements. The facility did not provide a policy for posting nurse staffing information. The facility failed to ensure the posted daily nurse staffing sheets included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$69,565 in federal fines across 8 penalties.

  • $4,893 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
  • $4,893 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
  • $14,679 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
  • $4,893 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2024-01-02
  • $13,635 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
  • $12,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
  • $9,440 — penalty dated 2023-09-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 17E531. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next