Lincoln Park Manor INC
922 N 5th St, Lincoln, KS 67455 · Non profit - Corporation · 36 certified beds · (785) 524-4428 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2022
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 23.7% | 17.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.1% | 4.9% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.2% | 1.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.3% | 2.9% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.6% | 6.5% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.9% | 4.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.0% | 16.2% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 26.8% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 86.1% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.3% | 4.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 39.1% | 22.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 31.2% | 18.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.72 | 1.80 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.73 | 2.13 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 36 beds and averages 32.3 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.33 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.98 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.39 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The facility had one main kitchen and one main dining area. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the director of food and nutrition services had the required qualifications of a certified dietary manager (CDM). This placed residents at risk for unmet dietary and nutritional needs.Findings included:- On 08/19/25 at 08:20 AM, Dietary BB stated she did not have her CDM certification, but the administrator and she were currently enrolled in classes to get certified.On 08/19/25 at 10:15 AM, Administrative Staff A stated that the dietary manager and she were currently in classes to get certified as a dietary manager. Administrative Staff A stated the registered dietician came to the facility twice a month, but she was always available by phone.The facility's Dietician policy dated July 2025 documented if a dietician was not employed full-time, a director of food and nutrition services would be designated. This individual would be a certified dietary manager; or a certified food service manager;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed appropriate Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) and hand hygiene while providing wound care to Resident (R) 38 and R2. The facility failed to ensure R10's nasal cannula (NC- a hollow tube medical device that provides supplemental oxygen therapy to people who have lower oxygen levels) and nebulizer (a device that changes liquid medication into a mist easily inhaled into the lungs) mask was properly stored when not in use. This placed R38, R2, and R10 at risk of infection development and possible respiratory complications.Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R2 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility pharmacist consultant failed to provide the facility with a monthly Drug Regimen Review for February 2025, which placed all residents who received prescribed medications from the facility at risk for less supervision regarding their medication regimen. The facility pharmacist consultant failed to continue to request a gradual dose reduction (GDR) or a physician's rationale and the risks versus benefits for Resident (R) 6's sertraline (antidepressant- a class of medications used to treat mood disorders), for R17's Seroquel (antipsychotic- a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) use, and obtain a stop date for R10's as needed (PRN) Ativan (antianxiety- a class of medication that calm and relax people).Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record for R17 documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 34 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secure when a medication cart was left unlocked and unattended, failed to label and date insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) pens when opened, and failed to remove expired medication from use. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of receiving ineffective medication.Findings included:- On 08/18/25 at 09:32 AM, the facility's west medication cart contained:An insulin flex pen without a name or an opened date. A bottle of Aspirin (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug- NSAID), 81 milligram (mg) pills, expired 08/2024. Systane (eye lubricant) eye drops, expired 06/2025. Dulcolax (laxative) pills,100 mg, expired 04/2023. On 08/18/25 at 09:45 AM, the facility's east medication cart contained: Two unlabeled, undated insulin pens.A bottle of melatonin (sleep aide) 3 mg pills, expired April 30, 2024.Artificial tears, expired 03/2023.On 08/20/25 at 12:25 PM, the facility's medication room emergency medication kit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R)1 had a physician's order and was assessed for the ability to safely self-administer medications left at the bedside. This placed R1 at risk for improper use of medications and related side effects.Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R1 documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissue), chronic pain, anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension uncertainty, and irrational fear), hypertension (high blood pressure), and atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat).The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R1 had moderately impaired cognition.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff secured and protected the privacy and confidentiality of Resident (R) 24's medical record. This placed this resident at risk for impaired right to confidentiality.Findings included:- On 08/19/25 at 08:08 AM, an observation revealed that facility staff left R24's point of care (POC) information of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) open and visible on the east medication cart laptop. On 08/19/25 at 08:09 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R stated the screen should not be left unlocked with resident information open.On 08/20/25 at 09:02 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated that the medication cart and the laptop screen should always be locked when away from the cart.On 08/20/25 at 12:15 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated she would expect any nursing staff to lock any screen on the laptop, and the medication cart should always be locked as well when a staff member was not in direct sight of the cart.The facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain a stop date for Resident (R) 10's as needed (PRN) Ativan (an antianxiety medication class of medication that calms and relaxes people). The facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication for R17's Seroquel (an antipsychotic) and failed to document a physician's rationale and the risks versus benefits for the Seroquel use. The facility further failed to obtain a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for R6. This placed the residents at risk for unnecessary psychotropic (alters perception, mood, consciousness, cognition, or behavior) medications and related complications.Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record for R10 documented diagnoses of vascular dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion caused by a decreased blood flow to the brain), anxiety (mental or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 38's care plan was revised with interventions to reflect his current level of staff assistance her required after a recent hospital stay and on hospice care. The facility failed to update R2's care plan with interventions related to the need for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP- infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms, which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). This placed R38 and R2 at risk for delayed or missed care.Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R2 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with one reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate respiratory care and services for Resident (R) 10 when staff failed to store their oxygen tubing and cannula (a medical device used to deliver supplemental oxygen through the nostril) and nebulizer (a medical device that converts liquid medication into a fine mist, allowing it to be inhaled into the lungs) mask in a sanitary manner when not in use. This placed the resident at risk for an infection.Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record for R10 documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), vascular dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion caused by a decreased blood flow to the brain), anxiety (mental or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with two residents sampled for hospice care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was a collaboration of care between Resident (R) 2 and R38's hospice provider and the facility which included the information on what hospice would provide the residents. This placed R2 and R38 at risk of inadequate end-of-life care. Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R2 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). The “Significant Change Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to employ a full time certified dietary manager for the 32 residents who resided in the facility and received meals form the facility kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition. Findings included: - On 12/14/23, review of the noon meal consisted of enchiladas, refried beans, whole kernel corn, garlic bread, and apple pie. On 12/14/23 at 11:20AM, observation revealed Dietary Staff BB in the kitchen overseeing the preparation of the noon meal. On 12/13/23 at 08:1AM, Dietary Staff BB verified she was not a certified dietary manager. Dietary Staff BB stated she had not started the certified dietary manager classes. On 12/14/23 at 2:00PM, Administrative Staff A verified Dietary Staff BB had no dietary manager certification. Upon request the facility did not provide a policy regarding Certified Dietary management requirements. The facility failed to employ a full time certified dietary manager for 32 residents who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the 32 residents who received their meals from the facility's kitchens when staff stored uncovered hamburger in two freezers. Kitchen staff failed to defrost the chest freezer and clean the outside of a chest and upright freezer. Kitchen staff failed to ensure the dishwasher sanitizing test strips were still effective. This placed the 32 residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - On 12/13/23 at 08:15 AM, observation in the kitchen revealed the following: The inside of the white chest freezer, located in the dry storage room, had approximately one-quarter inch ice buildup, 13 uncovered quarter-pound hamburger patties, and seven slider hamburgers in an unsealed zip-lock bag. The outside of the white chest freezer and upright freezer, located in the dry storage room, had numerous different size areas of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-19 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 32 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information through Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ) as required. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for unidentified and ongoing inadequate nurse staffing. Findings included: - The PBJ report provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for Fiscal Year (YR) 2023 Quarter 2 and 3 indicated the facility did not have licensed nurse coverage 24 hours a day, seven days a week on multiple days, (Quarter 2: 5 dates, Quarter 3: 6 dates) Review of the facility licensed nurse payroll data for the dates listed on the PBJ revealed a licensed nurse on duty for 24 hours a day seven days a week. On 12/13/23 at 08:00 AM, observation revealed a licensed nurse on duty in the facility. On 12/14/23 at 12:30 PM, Administrative Staff B stated the facility's corporate office completed the PBJ report and would have access to the staff schedule from the computer. On 12/18/23 at 08:00 AM, Administrative Staff B stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-19 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to include two sampled residents, Resident (R) 1 and R14, in the development and planning of the residents' care plan. This placed the residents at risk of impaired care and decreased autonomy. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R1 documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), dementia with other behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), auditory hallucinations (sensing things while awake that appear to be real, but the mind created), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), migraines ( a recurrent, throbbing headache that typically affects one side of the head and is often accompanied by nausea and disturbed vision),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 had a physician's order and was assessed for the ability to safely self-administer medications left at the bed side. This placed R1 at risk for improper use of medication and related side effects. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R1 documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), dementia with other behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), auditory hallucinations (sensing things while awake that appear to be real, but the mind created) , anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), migraines (a recurrent, throbbing headache that typically affects one side of the head and is often accompanied by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had census of 32 residents. The sample included 14 residents with one reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a written notice for a facility-initiated transfer to Resident (R32) or her representative within a practicable time when R32 was transferred to the hospital. This placed the resident at risk for uninformed care choices. Findings included: - R32's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R32 had diagnoses of heart failure, hypoxemia (abnormal deficiency in the concentration of oxygen in arterial blood) and edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues). R32's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R32's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R32 required extensive staff assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs). R32's Care Area Assessment (CAA) did not trigger for hydration/fluid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-19 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)32 or his representative with written information regarding the facility bed hold policy when R32 was transferred to the hospital. This placed R32 at risk for not being permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility. Findings included: - R32's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R32 had diagnoses of heart failure, hypoxemia (abnormal deficiency in the concentration of oxygen in arterial blood) and edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues). R32's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R32's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R32 required extensive staff assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs). R32's Care Area Assessment (CAA) did not trigger for hydration/fluid maintenance. R32's Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan for Resident (R) 30 to include the Black Box Warning (BBW- highest safety-related warning that medications can have assigned by the Food and Drug Administration) for risperidone (antipsychotic medication) for staff direction to monitor for side effects from the antipsychotic medication. This placed the residents at risk due to uncommunicated care needs and adverse side effects. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R30 documented diagnoses of frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder (occurs when nerve cells in the frontal and temporal lobes of the brain are lost), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), expressive language disorder (caused by brain damage sustained from neurological conditions), and abnormalities of gait and mobility. The Significant Change-5 Day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with five reviewed for falls, Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to evaluate effectiveness of fall interventions and change or modify the interventions which were ineffective at preventing falls for Resident (R) 19. This placed the resident at risk for further falls and injury. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R19 documented diagnoses of weakness, epilepsy (a brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures), congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), transient ischemic attack (TIA- temporary episode of inadequate blood supply to the brain), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), and pain. The Quarterly- 5 Day Medicare Minimum Data Set (MD, dated 12/29/23, documented R19 had intact cognition and required supervision and one staff assistance for dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. R19 required supervision and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 14 residents with one reviewed for hydration. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility nursing staff failed to consistently monitor Resident (R) 32's fluid intake related to a physician-ordered fluid restriction. This placed R32 at risk for fluid overload. Findings included: - R32's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R32 had diagnoses of heart failure, hypoxemia (abnormal deficiency in the concentration of oxygen in arterial blood) and edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues). R32's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R32's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R32 required extensive staff assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs). R32's Care Plan, revised on 09/13/23, documented R32 received a 2000 cubic centimeter (cc) fluid restriction and instructed dietary to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist identified and reported that Resident (R) 26's as needed (PRN) Xanax (a sedative used for anxiety and panic disorder) lacked a 14-day stop date or specified duration which included a physician rationale. This placed the resident at risk for inappropriate use of medications. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R26 recorded diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), and restlessness and agitation. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R26 had severely impaired cognition and was independent with dressing, toileting, eating, and oral care. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to identify Resident (R) 30's allergy medication, Benadryl, with psychotropic (alters mood or thoughts) properties being used to treat anxiety and failed to apply the required 14-day stop date or obtain a specified duration for use with a physician rationale as required for as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications. The facility further failed to ensure an appropriate indication for R30's risperidone (an antipsychotic) or the required physician documentation and failed to ensure R30's PRN lorazepam (an antianxiety medication) had a physician's rationale for the extended use. The facility also failed to ensure R26's PRN Xanax (a sedative used for anxiety and panic disorder) had a 14-day stop date as required. This placed the residents at risk for unnecessary psychotropic medications and related complications. Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample had 14 residents, with six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed ensure a medications error rate of less than five percent (%) when staff incorrectly administered medications to Resident (R)1. This placed the resident at risk for improper use of medication and related side effects and resulted in a medication error rate of 27 %. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R1 documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), dementia with other behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), auditory hallucinations (sensing things while awake that appear to be real, but the mind created) , anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), migraines (a recurrent,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with one reviewed for hospice (a type of health care that focused on the terminally ill patient's pain and symptoms and attended to their emotional and spiritual needs at the end of life) services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a coordinated plan of care, which coordinated care and services provided by the facility with the care and services provided by hospice, was developed and available for Resident (R) 26. This placed R26 at risk for inappropriate and/or unmet end of life cares. Findings included: - R26's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), and restlessness and agitation. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R26 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 14 residents with one reviewed for bladder and bowel incontinence. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility staff failed exercise appropriate hand hygiene when providing Resident (R)31 incontinent and catheter (tube inserted directly into the bladder to drain urine) cares. This placed the resident at risk for infection. Findings included: - R31's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R31 had diagnoses reflux uropathy (condition when urine flows backwards into your kidneys (two bean-shaped organs found on the left and right sides of the body) and urine retention (lack of ability to urinate and empty the bladder). R31's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R31 had short term memory problems and modified independent cognitive skills for daily decision making. The MDS documented R31 required limited staff assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs), had an indwelling urinary catheter (tube placed in the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag), and was frequently…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 13 residents reviewed for care plan. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to revise and update Resident (R)29, R22, R30 and R31s' care plan with interventions aimed to prevent falls and fall related injuries. This placed the residents at risk for ineffective care and monitoring. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R29 documented diagnoses of restless leg syndrome (a condition that causes an uncontrollable urge to move the legs, usually because of an uncomfortable sensation), history of stress fracture (a crack in the bone due to repetitive pressure), osteoporosis (abnormal loss of bone density and deterioration of bone tissue with an increased fracture risk), and artificial left knee joint (a procedure that involves cutting away of damage cartilage and bone). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R29 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of six which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 13 residents with nine reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a root cause analysis to identify causative factors and failed to implement meaningful, resident centered interventions for five sampled residents, Resident (R) 22, R30, R31, and R29, who were at risk and had falls. This placed the residents at increased risk for falls and fall related injury. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R22 had diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), hypertension (high blood pressure), and depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 32 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control standard of practice. The facility failed to practice proper hand hygiene while serving residents their meals in the dining room. The facility failed to provide a clean barrier under the glucometer (instrument used to calculate blood glucose) while obtaining blood glucose reading. The facility failed to ensure staff sanitized the facility glucometer after each use. The facility failed to properly store the scoop for the ice chest in a sanitary manner. This placed the residents at risk for increased infection and transmission of communicable disease. Findings included: - On 05/23/22 at 11:10 AM Dietary Staff CC and Dietary Staff DD donned a hairnet and gloves as they came out of the kitchen area carrying trays with the plates and bowls of food on them to serve to residents. Gloves were not removed after serving food from the tray. On 05/23/22 at 11:14 AM Dietary Staff CC walked out of the kitchen with the same gloves on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with four reviewed for neglect. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)22 remained free from neglect when staff failed to provide the necessary care and services during a transfer as directed by R22's plan of care. This deficient practice placed R22 at risk for injury and impaired physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R22 had diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), hypertension (high blood pressure), and depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness. R22's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R22 had moderately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility staff failed to report an injury of unknown origin to administration staff for one sampled resident, Resident (R) 30, who had a bruise with swelling on top of her forehead. This placed the resident at risk for further injury and unidentified abuse or mistreatment. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R30 had diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R30 had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. The MDS further documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin for one sampled resident, Resident (R) 30, who had a bruise with swelling on top of her forehead. This placed the resident at risk for further injury and unidentified abuse or mistreatment. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R 30 had diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R30 had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. The MDS further documented R30 had unsteady…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-26 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 13 residents. One resident (R)9 was reviewed for transfer and discharge. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide written notice of discharge when R9 was discharged to an acute care facility. Findings included: - The electronic medical record for R9 documented diagnoses of pneumonia (inflammation of the lungs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side (muscular weakness of one half of the body and paralysis of one side of the body following a stroke), and congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R9 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight which indicated a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with one reviewed for change of condition. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow up with care in a timely period consistent with standards of nursing care after Resident (R) 31 developed increased weakness in her right arm. This placed R31, who had a history of a stroke at increased risk for physical decline and delay in treatment. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance (problems with reasoning, planning, judgement, memory and other thought processes caused by impaired blood supply to the brain), cerebrovascular disease (an area of the brain is temporarily or permanently affected by bleeding of one or more of the cerebral blood vessels) and cerebral infarction (CVA-occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it). R31's Annual Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident (R)9 and R4's oxygen (O2) tubing was dated and stored in a plastic bag when not in use. This deficient practice left R9 and R4 at risk for respiratory complication and increased risk for bacteria formation. Findings included: - The electronic medical record for R9 documented diagnoses of pneumonia (inflammation of the lungs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side (muscular weakness of one half of the body and paralysis of one side of the body following a stroke), and congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility's failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP)followed up with monthly with recommendations to change R31's inappropriate diagnosis for the Seroquel (antipsychotic medication) [medication used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions]). The facility further failed to ensure staff followed up on the CP recommendation from June 2021. This deficient practice placed R31 at risk for adverse side effects related to antipsychotic use. Finding included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance (problems with reasoning, planning, judgement, memory and other thought processes caused by impaired blood supply to the brain), anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease), cerebrovascular disease (an area of the brain is temporarily or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with five residents' reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide interventions for lack of bowel movements for one sampled resident, Resident (R) 31, who had a history of constipation (difficulty in emptying the bowels) This placed the resident at risk for complications related to constipation. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R31 had diagnoses of constipation, congestive heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), and hypertension (high blood pressure). R31's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. The MDS documented the resident was always continent of bowel. R31's EMR lacked documentation a Bladder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 32 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate diagnosis for Resident (R) 31's Seroquel (antipsychotic medication [medication used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions]). placing R31 at risk for adverse side effects. Finding included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R31 had diagnoses of vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance (problems with reasoning, planning, judgement, memory and other thought processes caused by impaired blood supply to the brain), anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease), cerebrovascular disease (an area of the brain is temporarily or permanently affected by bleeding of one or more of the cerebral blood vessels), altered mental status (changes in cognition, mood, or behavior), and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LINCOLN PARK MANOR INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/23/2017 |
| GRACE, RYAN | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2022 |
| HUEBERT, ERIC | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2022 |
| GRACE TEAM LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/17/2025 |
| CHENEY, JASON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2022 |
| WALTERS, DIANE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/02/2020 |
| GT SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $634K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175419. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.