No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Linn Community Nursing Home

612 Third St, Linn, KS 66953 · Non profit - Corporation · 42 certified beds · (785) 348-5551 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Jul 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$10,036 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (20) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $10,036 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-05)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
609 Liberty St · (785) 632-2181 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
227 C St · (785) 325-3130 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
303 5th St · (785) 348-5411 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
210 Church St · (785) 348-5332

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.5%17.9%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.2%4.9%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.1%6.5%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.9%4.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.5%16.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.4%23.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.8%4.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control38.8%22.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.6%18.1%17.1%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.651.801.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.902.131.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.07U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.7%CMS range 7.4–18.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.251.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.67
RN hours/ resident / day
0.62
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.08
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.38
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.49
RN hoursweekends
51.1%
Total nursing turnover
0.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 42 beds and averages 38.8 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-25)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-05)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with four reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure an environment free from accident hazards for cognitively impaired Resident (R) 35. On 05/23/24 at approximately 10:07 AM, Dietary Staff (DS) BB let R35 out the exit door by the main dining room, which led to the patio. DS BB then returned to dietary tasks without ensuring additional supervision for R35. The patio area contained a gate that was unlocked and R35 exited the patio area through the unlocked gate. At approximately 10:39 AM, Maintenance Staff U saw R35 on a bench by the front door reading a newspaper and when he went out the door, R35 walked back inside the facility. At approximately 01:12 PM, another resident asked DS BB to go outside, and DS BB stated they would have to check with the charge nurse to see if the resident could go outside. When DS BB asked the charge nurse, DS BB mentioned letting R35 outside…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 41 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food by professional standards for food service safety in one kitchen and two kitchenettes. Findings included:- On 02/23/26 at 08:35 AM, observation in the kitchen revealed a freezer with the following undated food items:A plastic bag with 4 filet steak patties.A plastic bag, approximately 1/4 full, grilled shrimpA plastic bag, approximately 1/4 full, of French fries.A plastic bag, approximately 1/4 full, chicken stripsA plastic bag approximately 1/4 full of popcorn chicken.A plastic bag full of taco meat.A plastic bag, approximately 1/4 full of tater totsA plastic bag, approximately 1/4 full of chicken patties.A plastic bag, approximately 1/4 full of breaded mushrooms.An unsealed, undated plastic bag of choriquesco. On 02/23/26 at 08:40 AM, Dietary Staff (DS) CC verified the above findings and stated she was unaware that the freezer food items needed to be labeled and dated. On 02/23/26 at 09:15 AM, observation in the small…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-25 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 41 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a Facility Assessment to include the nursing resources necessary to care for the residents during the day-to-day operations, which has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings included:- Review of the Facility Assessment revealed the document lacked specific staffing levels and number of Registered Nurses (RN), Licensed Nurses (LPN/LVN), Certified Medication Aides (CMA), and Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) needed for each unit, resident needs, and census. The assessment lacked the staffing levels required for each shift. On 02/24/26 at 09:34 AM, Administrative Nurse D reported the facility's minimum staffing pattern was two staff who could pass medications, one of which would be a licensed nurse, for both neighborhoods. Each neighborhood scheduled two CNA's (a total of four) for day and evening shifts. The night shift for both neighborhoods was scheduled with one licensed nurse and two nurse aides. Administrative Nurse D verified she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one reviewed for hospice services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)9's care plan, who admitted to hospice on 02/10/26, included a plan of care and a description of the services provided, which included contact information, visit frequency, medications, and medical equipment. Findings included:- R9's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). R9's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R9 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS document R9 required supervision with most activities of daily living (ADL) and R9 received hospice care services. The Cognitive Loss/Dementia Care Area Assessment, (CAA), dated 02/10/26, documented R9 had dementia. R9's Care Plan, revised 02/22/26,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment, to help prevent the potential development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. when staff failed to change gloves when going from a dirty to clean area during incontinence care for Resident (R)15. Findings included:- On 02/24/26 at 10:00 AM, observation revealed R15 was in bed, with a urinal in place under his covers. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M and Licensed Nurse (LN) G entered R15's room. CNA M asked R15 if he was finished using the urinal, and he replied 'yes'. CNA M and LN G applied gloves, CNA M removed the urinal, and spilled urine on the bed pad and her gloves. CNA M then handed LN G the urinal. LN G poured the urine in the toilet and discarded her gloves and donned new gloves. CNA M provided perineal care to R15 and assisted LN G in positioning R15 on his left side, with the same soiled gloves. CNA M touched R15's bedding, oxygen tubing, and legs with the same soiled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included two residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to report Resident (R) 1's request to not be pushed by Maintenance Staff U as witnessed by staff to the State Agency (SA) as required. This placed R1 at risk for ongoing abuse and mistreatment. Findings included: - R1's electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure), pain, unspecified soft tissue disorder, generalized edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), low back pain, muscle weakness, retention of urine, and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness). R1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented that R1 had intact cognition, used a wheelchair or walker, required set up or clean up assistance with toileting hygiene, bathing, and upper body dressing. R1 also required set-up or clean-up assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 37 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to fully investigate an allegation of abuse for Resident (R) 1. This placed the resident at risk for ongoing abuse. Findings included: - R1's electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure), pain, unspecified soft tissue disorder, generalized edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), low back pain, muscle weakness, retention of urine, and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness). R1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented that R1 had intact cognition, used a wheelchair or walker, required set up or clean up assistance with toileting hygiene, bathing, and upper body dressing. R1 also required set-up or clean-up assistance with rolling in bed, sitting to lying, and lying to sitting. The MDS further documented R1 required supervision or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store foods and ensure proper dishwashing in a manner to prevent food-borne illness. This placed the residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - On 05/30/24 at 09:22 AM, during the initial kitchen tour, observation revealed the following: The stainless-steel double-door refrigerator with a freezer on the bottom lacked a thermometer in the refrigerator section. The freezer section had seven opened, unsealed, unlabeled bags of frozen foods. The thermometer on the door shelf was not working. The walk-in freezer had boxes of homestyle portion chicken, frozen pasta, white shrimp, diced strawberries, and peach pies stored on the freezer floor. The white refrigerator in the hallway entry with a freezer in the top portion that had seven containers of an expired frozen product with a label that read Must be used by 06/28/23. On 06/03/24 at 10:48 AM, observation in the facility kitchen revealed the walk-in freezer lacked an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 38 residents. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement a water management program for Legionella disease (Legionella is a bacterium spread through mist, such as from air-conditioning units for large buildings. Adults over the age of 50 and people with weak immune systems, chronic lung disease, or heavy tobacco use are most at risk of developing pneumonia caused by Legionella). This placed the residents in the facility at risk for infectious disease. Findings included: - The facility's Water Temperature Check Log documented checks of laundry, kitchen, common areas, and resident rooms weekly. The facility did not have documentation of Legionella preventative measures including identification of risk areas and actions taken to mitigate risk. During an interview on 06/04/24 at 03:10 PM, Maintenance Staff V verified the facility lacked a map of water distribution and dead-end or little-used faucets despite one whole resident hall was not used. Maintenance Staff V confirmed there was no documentation of disinfection of shower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported an unapproved indication for use, the lack of target behaviors and side effect monitoring, and lack of patient-specific rationale describing why a gradual dose reduction (GDR) was contraindicated for the use of psychotropic (alters mood or thoughts) medications for Resident (R) 6, R13, R22, and R21. This placed the residents at risk for unnecessary medication side effects. Findings included: - R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), documented diagnoses of altered mental status, slurred speech, kidney failure, anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 6, R13, R22, and R21 had approved indications and adequate monitoring for the use of psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medications. This placed the residents at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings included: - R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), documented diagnoses of altered mental status, slurred speech, kidney failure, anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). R6's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R6 had severe cognitive impairment with no signs or symptoms of delirium (sudden severe confusion,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 9 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 38 residents. Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to offer pneumococcal (type of bacterial infection) immunizations for four of the six residents sampled for immunizations: Residents (R) 13, R25, R12, and R24. This placed the residents at risk for complications related to pneumococcal pneumonia. Findings included: - R13's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documentation indicated R13 received one Pneumovax dose on 04/07/16. The facility lacked documentation R13 was offered or refused any further pneumococcal vaccinations. R13's Physician Order dated 03/26/21, directed staff to administer the pneumococcal vaccine per facility policy. R25's EHR documentation indicated R25 received one Pneumovax dose on 12/05/19. The facility lacked documentation R25 was offered or refused any further pneumococcal vaccinations. R25's EHR documented an admitting diagnosis of pneumonia and a Physician Order dated 02/23/22 that directed staff to administer the pneumococcal vaccine per facility policy. R12's EHR documentation indicated R12 received one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 17 or his representative with written information regarding the facility bed hold policy when R17 transferred to the hospital. This placed the resident at risk of not being permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility. Findings included: - R17's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R17 had diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid) and acute (condition characterized by a relatively sudden onset of symptoms that are usually severe) upper respiratory infection (infections of parts of the body involved in breathing, such as the sinuses, throat, airways or lungs). R17's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R17 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one reviewed for discharge. Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for Resident (R) 39, which included a recapitulation (a concise summary of the resident's stay and course of treatment in the facility) summary of the resident's stay in the facility. This placed the resident at risk of unidentified and unmet care needs. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR), documented R39 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and documented diagnoses of idiopathic peripheral neuropathy (no identifiable cause for weakness, numbness, and pain from nerve damage, usually in the hands and feet), enterocolitis (disease of the digestive tract) due to clostridium (C-diff: contagious bacteria characterized by foul-smelling frequent loose bowel movements), edema (swelling), vomiting, calculus (area of thickened and sometimes hardened skin that forms as a response to repeated friction,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to assess Resident (R) 22 for trauma-informed care needs to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident. This placed R22 at risk for impaired quality of life. Findings included: - R22's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of hypertension (elevated blood pressure), mild cognitive impairment, muscle weakness, chronic pain, and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion) with psychotic (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality perception) disturbance. R22's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R22 had intact cognition. R22 had no delirium (sudden severe confusion, disorientation, and restlessness), but did have delusions (untrue persistent belief or perception held by a person although evidence shows it was untrue) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the 37 residents who resided in the facility and received their food from the facility kitchen, when the facility failed to ensure clean and sanitary food prep and storage areas, and failed to wear hairnets in the two kitchenettes, while dishing up food for the residents meals. This placed the 37 residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - 01/24/23 at 9:00 AM observation revealed the following in the kitchen: The white refrigerator located next to the entrance door of the kitchen had dried red liquids stain approximately two inches (in) wide underneath the two bottom drawers at the bottom of the fridge and the door shelves had numerous different size brownish black dried liquid stains. The freezer above the white refrigerator had numerous specks of different size food particles on all shelves. The silver refrigerator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents with no COVID-19 ((an acute respiratory illness capable of producing severe respiratory complications including death) positive residents identified. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to identify high community transmission rates for COVID-19 and failed to ensure facility staff wore masks to protect COVID-19 transmission for the 37 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: - On 01/24/23 at 08:30AM, upon entrance into the facility observation revealed facility staff did not wear masks to prevent COVID-19 transmission in the resident care and resident common areas. On 01/24/23 at 08:35AM, Administrative Nurse D verified that facility staff were not wearing masks. On 01/24/23 at 09:45AM, Administrative Nurse D stated the facility checks every Thursday regarding the transmission rate for COVID-19 and then makes the decision if facial coverings/masks were required. The Centers for Disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to exercise safe needle (sharp) practice after Resident (R) 3 received an intramuscular injection (an injection in a muscle). This placed R3 and others in the affected area at risk for accidental needle sticks. Findings included: - On 01/25/23 at 01:10PM, observation revealed Licensed Nurse (LN) G entering R3's room with a syringe. Further observation revealed R3 laying on her bed on her left side. LN G pulled back the resident's blanket on the bed and exposed her right hip area. LN G put on clean gloves and used an alcohol wipe and cleansed a small are on R3's right hip area. LN G injected Rocephin (an antibiotic) into R3's hip. LN G then covered R3 with the blanket and moved his hands all around the bed. On 01/25/23 at 01:10PM, LN G stated he was looking for the cap for the syringe, and stated he lost the cap, but he guessed the staff could get the cap when they got the resident back out of bed. On 01/25/23 at 01:15PM, observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to treat Resident (R) 3 with respect and dignity by not providing privacy during an intramuscular (IM-an injection in a muscle) injection. This placed the resident at risk for an undignified life. Findings included: - On 01/24/23 at 12:15PM, observation revealed R3 seated in a wheelchair at the dining table. Further observation revealed Licensed Nurse (LN) H pulled up R3's clothing to expose her left hip area. LN H administered an IM injection into R3's left hip at the dining table. Further observation revealed eight other residents seated in the dining room. On 01/25/23 at 01:20PM, Administrative Nurse D stated the expectation of the facility was to provide dignity for all residents. Administrative Nurse D stated R3 should have been taken to a private area for the nurse to administer the injection into R3's hip. The Dignity policy, dated 01/04/23, stated the facility will promote care for elders of the facility in a manner and in an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to identify, assess and respond to alteration in Resident (R) 13's skin condition. This placed the resident at risk for delay in intervention to prevent further injury and unidentified care needs. Findings included: - R13's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented she had diagnoses of heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should) and dementia (a disorder affecting thinking and social systems that interferes with daily functioning). R13's Annual Minimal Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of six, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented the resident required extensive assistance with bed mobility and transfers. The MDS further documented no skin issues. The Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 12/06/22, documented R13 required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$10,036 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $10,036 — penalty dated 2024-06-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
HATESOHL, PAULETTEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2019
HOCH-ALTWEGG, AMYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/08/2020
VOELKER, LISAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/24/2014
DIECKMANN, JACKIEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/23/2007
SCHMALE, KARENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/28/2008
VOELKER, GERALDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/01/2007

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 57%Medicare 6%Other / private 37%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$257per resident / day
operating cost
$7,808per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$272per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175494. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next