Sandstone Heights

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 36 beds and averages 25.6 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.11 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.33 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.22 to 0.81 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-01-16 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 27 residents. The sample included 15 residents with facility held personal fund accounts, reviewed for misappropriation and exploitation. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a system in place for the accurate accounting and reconciliation of resident fund accounts to prevent staff misappropriation and exploitation. The facility kept 14 manilla envelopes, each labeled with a resident's name, for the personal funds of Resident (R) 1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, and R14. Observation of the 14 envelopes revealed no paper cash in any of the 14 envelopes. R15 elected the facility as the payee and responsible party for her finances. The facility kept R15's money in a bank account with a debit card available. A facility employee used R15's bank card to withdraw money from the resident's bank account and made numerous unauthorized purchases without the resident's consent. The facility failed to record and track money in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 22 residents, with 11 residents sampled, including six residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were implemented to prevent falls for three residents. Resident (R)14 had multiple falls with no fall prevention interventions placed and fell on [DATE] at approximately 07:20 AM, which resulted in a fractured (broken bone) right hip that required hospitalization and surgical repair. The facility also failed to investigate, develop, and implement fall prevention interventions to prevent multiple falls for R9 and R10. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for Resident (R)14 included diagnoses of altered mental status (state of awareness that was different from the normal awareness of a person) and age-related osteoporosis (abnormal loss of bone density and deterioration of bone tissue with an increased fracture risk). The 10/02/24 Quarterly Minimum Data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-13 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the Federal regulatory agency through Payroll-Based Journaling (PBJ) when the facility failed to accurately submit hourly staffing data for all nursing personnel. Findings included: - Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report for Fiscal Year (FY) for Quarter 1 - 2024 (October 1 - December 31), revealed the facility failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 hours/Day on the following dates: 10/14/24 Saturday (SA), 10/20/24 Friday (FR), 10/21/24 Saturday (SA), 10/22/24 Sunday (SU), 10/28/24 Saturday (SA), 11/19/24 Sunday (SU). Review of the Nursing Schedule and Payroll Data Sheets for the above dates revealed the facility had 24-hour nursing coverage. During an interview on 03/12/25 at 11:15 AM, Administrative Nurse B confirmed the facility had 24-hour nursing coverage, even though it was not reflected on the PBJ report. On 03/12/25 at 12:45 PM, Administrative Nurse B provided payroll staffing data for the dates…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 22 residents. The sample included 11 residents with three reviewed for discharge. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a written bed hold policy notice to Residents (R) 3, R14, and R 9, or the resident's representatives, when they transferred to the hospital. This deficient practice had the risk of impaired ability to return to the facility and to the previous room for R3, R14, and R19. Finding included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) census log for R3 revealed a discharge from the facility to a hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The EHR lacked documentation related to written notification of the resident or resident's representative related to this discharge/transfer. Review of the EHR census log for R14 revealed a discharge from the facility to a hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The EHR lacked documentation related to written notification of the resident or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 22 residents and included 11 residents sampled and reviewed for care plan revision. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the care plans were reviewed and revised to develop and implement appropriate interventions to prevent multiple falls for three residents, Resident (R) 9, R10 and R14. These deficient practices resulted in ongoing increased risk of falls and had the potential to lead to uncommunicated needs that would negatively affect the physical and psychosocial well-being of the residents. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for Resident (R)14 included diagnoses of altered mental status (state of awareness that was different from the normal awareness of a person) and age-related osteoporosis (abnormal loss of bone density and deterioration of bone tissue with an increased fracture risk). The 10/02/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of five, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions for the residents of the facility. Finings included: - On 03/11/25 at 01:34 PM, kitchen tour with Dietary Aide (DA) K, revealed the following areas of concern: 1. Thirteen cookie sheets/pans with brown, dried, caked on substance on the exterior and the interior corners and cooking surfaces of each pan. Pans were in a upside down position, one on top of other, which resulted in the outside of one pan in direct contact with the cooking surface of the next pan. The surfaces were unsanitizable. 2. Seven frying pans/skillets with brown dried caked substance on exterior and interior corners and cooking surfaces were in a upside down position, one on top of other, the outside of one skillet/frying pan in direct contact with the cooking surface of the next skillet/frying pan. The surfaces were unsanitizable. 3. A metal rack with four shelves with rust and greasy sticky grim build-up on the upper which rendered them…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-06-15 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for at least eight continuous hours on 07/31/22 as required. This placed the residents in the facility at risk for unsupervised nursing care and services. Findings included: - The facility provided Daily Census Report, dated 06/12/23 documented 26 residents resided in the facility. On 06/12/23 at 10:30 AM, observation revealed 26 residents resided in the facility. Review of the nursing schedules for 07/01/22 through 08/31/22 documented one day without the required consecutive eight hours of RN coverage (07/31/22). Review of RN payroll documents for 07/01/22 through 08/31/22 revealed a lack of RN coverage on 07/31/22. On 6/13/23 at 03:30 PM, Administrative Nurse B confirmed no RN coverage on 07/31/22 and stated that she understood the regulation to mean that an RN could be on call and available by telephone. The facility failed to ensure eight consecutive hours of RN nursing coverage to ensure adequate nursing cares provided to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program with the failure of staff to provide appropriate perineal (the area of the body between the anus and genitals) care and urinary catheter (a hollow flexible tube that collects urine and leads to a collection bag) care for Resident (R)3, failure of the staff to sanitize equipment between resident use, failure to contain soiled laundry in appropriate containers and failure to maintain cleanable surfaces in the laundry area. This deficient practice with potential to negatively affect infection control for all residents in the facility. Findings included: - The 06/12/23 Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented R3 had the following diagnoses: fracture of femur (a broken thigh bone), diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2 - a chronic disease when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-06-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary environment for residents and staff in the facility laundry. Findings included: - On 06/14/23 at 02:39 PM, the tour of the laundry with Laundry Supervisor D revealed the following concerns: 1. The soiled laundry area contained a trash can that held used/soiled Personal Protective Equipment, that lacked a cover. 2. A handwashing sink with an unsanitizable three door cabinet due to peeling laminate an unsealed/bare wood exposed. 3. The floor area exiting the laundry and entering into the hallway to the delivery area, contained 19 broken/missing floor tiles. On 06/14/23 at 02:39 PM, Laundry/Housekeeping Supervisor D confirmed the tour of the laundry and verified the above concern findings. She reported staff should cover trash cans when putting used PPE in the trash to prevent cross contamination and prevent infection. Additionally, she agreed that the areas of bare wood should be sealed to have a sanitizable surface. On 06/14/23 at 02:45…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 26 residents and identified seven that received stock medication of magnesium oxide and multivitamins. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to monitor and ensure administration of nonexpired medication to these seven residents who received expired stock medication of magnesium multivitamin 400 milligrams. The seven affected residents included (R)1, R3, R5, R18, R22, R26, and R27. Findings included: - On [DATE] at 08:40 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) J, prepared medications for resident (R)1, which included Magnesium 400 mg, and Multivitamin ordered daily by mouth. After LN J prepared the resident's medications for administration, observation of the pharmacy medication labels found the following concerns: 1. The bottle of Magnesium Oxide, 400 mg tablets, noted to initially contain 120 tablets contained nine tablets. The pharmacy label indicated the expiration date of [DATE]. Upon inquiry LN J reported she did not check the medication for an expiration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-15 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 26 residents with 12 selected for review. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to protect the dignity of R3 when the environment around the resident and in her room contained the foul urine odors. Findings included: - On 06/12/23 at 11:12 AM, a heavy odor of urine was present in the hallway beside R3's room and intensified in the doorway of R3's room. On 06/12/23 at 12:10 PM, observation revealed an unidentified housekeeping staff cleaning R3's room and at that time, the foul urine odor was not detected. On 06/12/23 at 02:39 PM, R3 observed resting in her room with a heavy odor of urine present in the hallway outside the resident's room. R3's urinary catheter drainage bag revealed it was inside of a dark blue plastic trash can that stood on the floor next to the bed. On 06/13/23 at 10:54 AM, R3's room observed to have a mild odor of urine with R3 being currently absent from her room. On 06/13/23 at 04:00 PM, R3 observed to be resting in her room with a heavy odor of urine present in the hallway approximately 15…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 26 residents with 12 selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the MDS for Resident (R)15 and R3, with administration of oxygen. This placed the resident at risk for uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - The 06/12/23 Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented R3 had the following diagnoses: fracture of femur (a broken thigh bone), diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2 - a chronic disease when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscular weakness on one half of the body) following cerebrovascular disease (unspecified diseases of the brain tissues due to impaired blood flow to the brain). The 12/27/22 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a brief interview for mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$67,763 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $41,262 — penalty dated 2025-03-13
• $26,501 — penalty dated 2024-01-16
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-04-11 for 40 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS