Riverview Estates

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 36 beds and averages 29.8 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.35 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.99 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.57 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 23 residents. The sample size included 12 residents, with 12 residents reviewed for neglect. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent the neglect of Resident (R) 26, when staff failed to timely and competently assess and provide care for R26, who had a known history of sepsis (a life-threatening systemic reaction that developed due to infections which cause inflammation throughout the entire body). On 01/05/25 at 06:58 PM, R26 struggled to talk and drink liquids. Licensed Nurse (LN) H contacted the on-call physician and reported R26 acted similar to the last time R26 was septic. Based on this information, the physician ordered one gram of Rocephin (an antibiotic) every 24 hours for seven days and stated if R26 did not show any signs of improvement, or her condition worsened, then LN H was to send R26 to the Emergency Room. On 01/06/25 at 02:55 AM, R26 had oxygen on at two liters per minute, with shallow, labored respirations. R26's skin was pale and moist…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 27 residents, with three residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 2 and R1 remained free from verbal and mental abuse. This placed R2 and R1 at risk for continued abuse, embarrassment, humiliation, and decreased quality of life due to impaired psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - R2 ' s Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R2 had diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (MS- progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and pain. R2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, (MDS) dated [DATE], documented R2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R2 had an indwelling urinary catheter (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 23 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly date opened bags of food with the open date and the expiration date. This practice placed the 23 residents at risk for foodborne illness and poor-quality food. Findings included: - On 03/13/25 at 08:20 AM, an inspection of the facility kitchen cold storage revealed the #4 upright freezer had seven opened, undated bags of frozen vegetables and potato items. The #5 freezer contained an opened box of hamburger patties with the plastic bag open to the air and undated. On 03/13/25 at 08:20 AM, Dietary Staff BB verified the bags were undated or the date was not readable. She stated the marker staff used for frozen foods was not appropriate as the ink rubbed off. The facility's Food Receiving and Storage policy, dated October 2017, stated foods would be received and stored in a manner that complied with safe food handling practices. The policy stated all foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer would be covered, labeled, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 23 residents. The sample size included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to adhere to infection control for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - an infection control intervention designated to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove used during high contact resident care activities), for Resident (R) 13 who had Influenza A (a contagious viral infection of the nose, throat and lungs that is spread from person to person through respiratory droplets). This placed the residents at increased risk for infection. Findings included: - On 03/13/25 at 09:30 AM, observation revealed License Nurse (LN) I entered the room of R13, who was on Droplet Precautions EBP. Observation revealed a sign posted on the resident's door of the resident's room giving instruction on personal protection equipment (PPE - gown and gloves). The PPE equipment and supplies were located in an over-the-door hanging container in the resident's room. Continued observation revealed LN I entered the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 23 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform background checks as required for four employees. The employees were allowed access to residents without knowing if they had been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment by a court of law. This deficient practice placed the 23 residents of the facility at risk for potential abuse, neglect, or exploitation. Findings included: - On 03/18/25 a review of staffing for background checks for facility staff was completed. Upon request and review the facility was unable to provide evidence a criminal background check had been completed before four employees began working around and with residents. The facility records revealed the following staff started employment at the facility before the background checks returned: Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) N started on 07/09/22 and the background check was not verified until 02/04/24. CNA O started on 01/24/24 and the background check was not verified until 02/12/24.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 23 residents. The sample includes 12 residents, with seven residents reviewed for immunizations, Resident (R) 5, R10, R11, R13, R16, R21, and R22, to include pneumococcal (a disease that refers to a range of illnesses that affect various parts of the body and are caused by infection) vaccinations. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to offer, or obtain an informed declination or a physician-documented contraindication for the pneumococcal PCV20 vaccination per the latest guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). This placed the residents at risk for pneumococcal infection and related complications. Findings included: - Review of R10, R11, R13, R16, and R21 clinical medical records lacked evidence the facility or the resident representative received or signed a consent to receive or informed declination for the pneumococcal vaccine PCV20. Review of R5's electronic health record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 23 residents. The sample size included 12 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify Resident (R) 26's physician or family when staff noted an abnormal bulge in R26's right abdomen on 01/03/25. The facility nursing staff also failed to notify the physician on 01/06/25 when R26 had a further deterioration in condition with shallow, labored respirations. R26's skin was pale and moist to the touch, and she had coarse lung sounds throughout. R26 did not respond when staff called her name, nor did she communicate with staff. LN H failed to call the physician or send R26 to the ER at that time. This deficient practice placed R26 at risk for serious health consequences. Findings included: - R26's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of sepsis, ulcer of the esophagus (the tube that carries food and liquids from the mouth to the stomach) with bleeding, fracture (broken bone) of shaft of the right humerus (upper arm bone), and age-related…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 23 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the State Long term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) of Resident (R)13's facility-initiated discharge to the hospital. This placed R13 at risk for impaired rights. Findings included: - R13's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) with behavioral disturbance, arteriosclerotic heart disease (ASHD, is a condition where the arteries that supply blood to the heart become narrowed and hardened due to buildup of plaque, a sticky substance), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). R13's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R13 had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS recorded she required extensive staff assistance with transfers and activities of daily living (ADL). The MDS documented the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 23 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two residents reviewed for discharge. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 13 with written information regarding the facility's bed hold policy when she was transferred to the hospital. This placed the resident at risk of not being permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility. Findings included: - R13's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) with behavioral disturbance, arteriosclerotic heart disease (ASHD - is a condition where the arteries that supply blood to the heart become narrowed and hardened due to buildup of plaque, a sticky substance), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). R13's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R13 had severe cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0661 — isolated
  Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 23 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a discharge summary that included a complete recapitulation (a concise summary of the resident's stay and course of treatment in the facility) of the resident's stay and post-discharge plan for Resident (R) 27. This placed the resident at risk for receiving inadequate care. Findings included: - R27's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R27's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R27 required limited staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). The MDS documented there are active discharge plans in place for returning R27 to return to the community. The Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 12/26/24, documented the resident was recently hospitalized for treatment of pneumonia and would receive physical therapy and occupational therapy. The CAA documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 23 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one reviewed for urinary catheter (insertion of a catheter into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 11 a device to secure the catheter tubing to keep it from pulling and causing discomfort. This deficient practice placed R11 at risk for pain or injury related to the catheter use and R11 developed two open sores related to the catheter rubbing. Findings included: - R11's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of an open wound of the penis (male organ with urethra tube which carries urine to outside the body), pain, and Urinary Tract Infection (UTI - an infection in any part of the urinary system). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented R11 required maximum staff assistance for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 23 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one reviewed for hospice (a type of health care that focuses on the terminally ill patient's pain and symptoms and attending to their emotional and spiritual needs at the end of life) services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure coordinated care and services provided by the facility with the care and services provided by hospice for Resident (R) 13. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate end-of-life care. Findings included: - R13's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) with behavioral disturbance, arteriosclerotic heart disease (ASHD - is a condition where the arteries that supply blood to the heart become narrowed and hardened due to buildup of plaque, a sticky substance), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$35,839 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $9,149 — penalty dated 2025-06-02
• $26,690 — penalty dated 2025-03-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS