Meade District Hosp Ltcu DBA Lone Tree Retirement
801 E Grant, Meade, KS 67864 · For profit - Corporation · 45 certified beds · (620) 873-2146 Medicaid only — no Medicare
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (18) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.3% | 17.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.5% | 4.9% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 2.9% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.8% | 6.5% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.3% | 4.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.8% | 16.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.2% | 23.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 13.2% | 4.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.5% | 22.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 0.9% | 18.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.33 | 1.80 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.73 | 2.13 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 31.0 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.91 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.01 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 32 residents, with three residents reviewed for risk of elopement (an incident in which a cognitively impaired resident with poor or impaired decision-making ability/safety awareness leaves the facility without the knowledge of staff). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and a safe environment as free of accident hazards as possible, to prevent the elopement of cognitively impaired and independently mobile Resident (R)2, who the facility identified as an elopement risk. On 05/25/24 R2 displayed an increase in his wandering/exit seeking behavior which included statements he was going to leave, and he attempted to push open the front. On 05/26/24 R2 pushed on the doors leading to the apartments, displayed agitation, and thought the facility was a jail. On 05/27/24 at 10:38 AM, R2 attempted to exit the front entrance without success. On 05/27/24 at 10:40 AM, visitors entered the building and held the door open for R2 and he exited the front entrance without staff knowledge. R2 remained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 33 residents, and one main kitchen. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria. This placed the residents at risk for food borne illnesses.Findings included:- Observation of the kitchen and food storage areas on 08/19/25 at 07:40 AM revealed the following areas of concern:Dry storage concerns:Four cases of soda cans and a 50-pound bag of sealed flour were stored on the floor.One unsealed bag of marshmallows.One bag of unsealed russet instant mashed potatoes.A large container of pinto beans that was not sealed with the lid all the way.Several bottles of spices with no date opened and no expiration date.Walk-In Cooler concerns:Several containers of caffeine and sunshine drink with straws in them, with initials TP and no date. Two bags of fresh broccoli unsealed,One bag of sliced onions unsealed.One box of Pizza [NAME] pizza, no date, no name.One unsealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-21 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain and/or dispose of kitchen garbage and refuse properly. This placed facility residents at risk for insect or rodent infestation.Findings included:- During a tour of the kitchen on 08/19/25 at 07:40 AM, observation revealed three garbage cans with no lids on them. During an observation on 08/20/25 at 10:20 AM, the same three garbage cans were found with no lids in the kitchen. Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) BB reported that the garbage cans did have lids and pulled a lid out from behind a garbage can and placed it on the can next to the steamer counter. CDM BB reported that the garbage cans should be covered. During an observation on 08/20/25 at 11:25 AM, the garbage can that was approximately three feet away from the stove had no lid. Dietary Staff CC had just finished cooking hamburgers and reported that the garbage cans in the kitchen rarely had a lid placed on them. During an interview on 08/20/25 at 01:00 PM, Administrative Staff A reported she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-21 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to designate a qualified Infection Preventionist (IP), who had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control, to be responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP). This failure has the potential to affect all 33 residents.Findings included:- During an interview on 08/19/25 at 07:50 AM, Administrative Staff A revealed she was the facility IP, and Administrative Nurse D assisted with the task. Administrative Staff A provided a certificate for completion of Nursing Home Infection Prevention Training Course dated 01/22/25.During an interview on 08/21/25 at 01:06 PM, Administrative Staff A reported she had a bachelor's degree in Aging Sociology but no health-related degrees. She confirmed she was the IP of the facility while Administrative Nurse D was taking the IP class to receive her certification. During an interview on 08/21/25 at 01:10 PM, Consultant Staff GG stated he thought any staff member could be the IP of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 33 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for five residents: Resident (R) 7, and R4 related to personal alarms; R5 related to pressure ulcers and medications; R2 related to dental; and R25 related to nutrition. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for impaired care due to unidentified care needs. Findings included:During an observation and interview on 08/19/25 at 01:23 PM, R7 reported she has had some falls and hit her head, which she needed staples sometime this past year. Observation revealed a bed and chair alarm in her room.R7's Care Plan in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) directed staff to provide a silent alarm on R7's bed and chair dated 09/11/24. R7's EHR recorded a Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], and an Annual MDS, dated [DATE], which both lacked documentation of R7's bed and chair alarm in Section P.During an observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 33 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on interviews, observation and record review, the facility failed to utilize Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) when providing direct care to a Resident (R) 5 with a Stage 3 (full-thickness pressure injury extending through the skin into the tissue below) pressure injury. The facility further failed to ensure adequate hand hygiene during personal care for R5 and R32 when staff failed to complete adequate hand hygiene. The facility failed to deliver food in a sanitary manner for several residents in the dining room. These deficient practices had the potential to spread infections to the residents in the facility.Findings included:- Observation on 08/20/25 at 05:49 PM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R delivered food to the resident's tables with thumbs touching the eating surface of the plate.Observation on 08/20/25 at 05:49 PM, Certified Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 33 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner when Resident (R)4 received care without privacy. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being and embarrassment. Findings included:- R4's Electronic Health Record (EHR) included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure) and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). R4's 07/17/25 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The assessment documented R4 was dependent on staff for transfers. The 07/17/25 Cognitive Loss / Dementia Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R4 had impaired cognitive function. The 07/17/25 ADL Functional / Rehabilitation Potential CAA documented R4 had a self-care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 33 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one resident reviewed for discharge. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a written discharge summary or recapitulation of the stay for Resident (R) 37. This placed the resident at risk for impaired rights related to continuity of care. Findings included:- R37's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented diagnoses that included chronic pain and hypothyroidism (a condition characterized by decreased activity of the thyroid gland).R37's Nursing Home Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R37's discharge from the facility to the community on 06/19/25.R37's EHR noted Physician Orders, which documented an order to discharge to independent apartments on Thursday, 06/19/25, dated 06/17/25.The EHR Progress Notes documented:On 06/11/25 at 11:09 AM, fax communication with the physician who requested orders to discharge the resident to home.On 06/12/25 at 10:25 AM, fax…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 27 residents with one central kitchen. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store foods safely and ensure proper sanitization and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illnesses for the residents of the facility. Findings included: - On 08/28/23 at 10:32 AM during the initial tour of the kitchen, revealed the facility's dish washer was not in working order. Dietary staff were washing all the dishes with the three-sink method. Dietary staff CC was in the dish room washing the dishes. He reported the dish machine was broke down and replacement parts were on back order. Until then, the dishes were being washed manually and sanitized. The dishes were sanitized with chlorine after washing. Dietary staff CC was not sure how to test the level of chlorine being used to sanitize the dishes. Dietary supervisor BB instructed/supervised dietary staff CC while he used testing strips to check the chlorine level. The sanitizing sink water tested at a concentration of 100 PPM and air dried. During the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-30 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 27 residents with all residents receiving meals from the one main kitchen. Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in good working condition by the failure to have a functioning dish machine since 08/08/23. This failure has made it necessary to manually wash all dishes used in the kitchen and for residents with questionable sanitization. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings included: - On 08/28/23 at 10:32 AM during the initial tour of the kitchen, revealed the facility's dish washer was not in working order. Dietary staff were washing all the dishes with the three-sink method. Dietary staff CC was in the dish room washing the dishes. He reported the dish machine was broke down and replacement parts were on back order. Until then, the dishes were being washed manually and sanitized. The dishes were sanitized with chlorine after washing. Dietary staff CC was not sure how to test the level of chlorine being used to sanitize the dishes.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility has a census of 27 with 12 residents included in the sample, two reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice regarding the use of nebulizer (a device that delivers medication as a mist to the lungs) for Resident (R) 26, and R27. Findings included: - The ''Physician Orders'' dated 07/04/23 for Resident (R)26 revealed the diagnosis included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive irreversible condition characterized diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). The admission Minimum Data Set dated 01/17/23, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status BIMS score of 15, that indicated intact cognition. The MDS further revealed R26 had shortness of breath and received oxygen therapy. The Care Plan dated 04/18/23, revealed R26 had shortness of breath and would require pulmonary rehabilitation at the local hospital. The resident had shortness of breath with ambulation, sitting in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 7 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 27 with 12 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment by the failure to clean the nebulizer equipment between uses for Resident (R)26, R27 and on R16 failed to provide proper hand hygiene during incontinent care. Findings included: - The ''Physician Orders'' dated 07/04/23 for Resident (R)26 revealed the diagnosis included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive irreversible condition characterized diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). The admission Minimum Data Set dated 01/17/23, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status BIMS score of 15, that indicated intact cognition. The MDS further revealed R26 had shortness of breath and received oxygen therapy. The Care Plan dated 04/18/23, revealed R26 had shortness of breath and would require pulmonary rehabilitation at the local hospital. The resident had shortness of breath with ambulation, sitting in a wheelchair, and while lying flat in bed. Staff offer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 33 residents, with 12 in the sample, and four reviewed for oxygen/respiratory care. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to change oxygen tubing and nebulizer tubing routinely and failed to ensure the nebulizer and oxygen tubing were stored sanitarily for Resident (R)9, R28, R17, and R25. Findings included: - The Physician's Orders dated 09/22/21 revealed R17 with a diagnosis of chronic pulmonary disease (progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. R17 required extensive assistance of two staff for most activities of daily living (ADL) and with no shortness of breath noted. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of nine, indicating moderate cognitive impairment, and no changes noted in ADL…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 33, with 12 residents in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 6 was treated with dignity when they did not provide a privacy bag for an indwelling catheter bag. Findings included: - The Physician's Orders dated 09/22/21 revealed a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease, stage 4 (persisting for a long period, often for the remainder of a person's lifetime). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. R6 required extensive assistance of two staff for most activities of daily living. The Care Plan dated 01/29/21 revealed R6 had an indwelling foley catheter due to obstructive uropathy and staff would change the indwelling foley catheter and drainage bag as ordered. Observation on 11/15/21 at 10:00 AM revealed the residents indwelling catheter bag hanging on the side of the bed with no privacy bag and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-16 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 33 residents, with 12 included in the sample. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 26 or the resident representative with a bed-hold policy upon transfer to a hospital. Findings included: - The signed Physician Orders dated 11/15/21 revealed diagnoses of colon cancer with metastasis (cancer that has spread to other organs of body). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed no significant changes from MDS dated [DATE]. Review of the Care Plan dated 10/12/21 revealed the resident last transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and returned 10/28/21. The Health Status Note dated 10/25/21 at 05:10 PM revealed R26 went to the hospital for further evaluation. The Health Status Note dated 10/25/21 at 07:05 PM revealed this nurse informed Administrative Nurse B the resident transferred to the hospital.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 33 residents, with 12 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to revise care plans for Resident (R) 9 and R28 in include care of the oxygen both residents were receiving. Findings included: - Review of R9's pertinent diagnosis from the 09/22/21 Physician Orders revealed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). The 05/17/21 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed R9 received oxygen. The 08/17/21 Annual MDS revealed the resident received O2. The 08/06/21 Comprehensive Care Plan revealed R9 used O2, the staff followed the cleaning instructions from the O2 supplier but lacked information on the frequency of O2 supplies. The 03/25/21 Physician Order revealed R9 received O2 at bedtime but lacked information on frequency of O2 supplies. Observation on 11/10/21 at 08:53 AM revealed R9 lying on her back with the head of the bed slightly elevated. She had her nasal cannula in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-08-21 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information to the Payroll-Based Journaling (PBJ) as required. Findings included:- Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 Quarter (Q) 3 (April 1 - June 30) and FY 2024 Q4 (July 1 - September 30) revealed the facility did not have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 hours a day on the following dates: 04/13/24, 04/28/24, 05/04/24, 05/05/24, 05/10/24, 05/11/24, 05/12/24, 05/25/24, 07/03/24, 07/07/24, 08/18/24, 09/22/24. Review of the facility's nursing schedule and payroll data for the above dates revealed the facility had 24-hour nursing coverage. During an interview on 08/20/25 at 04:00 PM, Consultant HH provided the nursing schedule and payroll data that revealed the time-keeping system had automatically removed a 30-minute lunch period for the above dates, even though the nurses remained in the building. The facility did not provide a policy related to PBJ reporting.
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-08-30 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 27 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information to the federal regulatory agency through Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ) when the facility failed to submit staffing hour data for all nursing personnel by the required deadline. Finding included: - The PBJ reported provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid services (CMS) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Quarter three documented the facility failed to have staff Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 hour/day on 04/09/22, 04/16/22, 06/05/22, and 06/19/22. The PBJ reported provided by the CMS for FY 2022 Quarter four documented the facility had a one-star staffing rating. The facility failed to have staff Registered Nurse hours on 07/02/22, 07/16/22, 08/27/22, and 09/10/22. The facility failed to have staff Licensed Nurse Coverage 24 hours/day on 07/02/22, 07/04/22, 07/09/22, 07/10/22, 07/16/22, 07/17/22 07/23/22, 07/30/22, 07/31/23, 08/06/22, 08/13/22, 08/14/22, 08/20/22, 08/27/22, 08/28/22, 09/03/22, 09/04/22, 09/10/22, 09/11/22,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in KS
CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 17E026. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.