Minneola District Hospital Ltcu
207 Chestnut, Minneola, KS 67865 · Government - Hospital district · 20 certified beds · (620) 885-4238 Medicaid only — no Medicare
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (23) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.7% | 17.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.3% | 4.9% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.7% | 1.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 5.1% | 2.9% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 6.5% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.4% | 4.3% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.6% | 16.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.0% | 23.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.0% | 4.4% | 4.7% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.4% | 22.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.6% | 18.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.86 | 1.80 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.63 | 2.13 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 20 beds and averages 15.0 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 7.16 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 5.02 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 6.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 7.59 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.73 to 1.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-03-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 19 residents, with eleven residents sampled, including five residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure that dependent resident (R)2 remained free from accident hazards/harm related to staff feeding R2 pureed foods, without ensuring the pureed foods were at a safe temperature to eat. The staff attempted to give R2 bites of pureed food which included: hot pureed soup, which had been heated 196 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and placed in an insulated container on the steam table; and a pureed grilled sandwich, which had been heated to 150 degrees F, without obtaining the temperature prior to serving the dependent resident. This failure placed R2 in immediate jeopardy. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)2's Physician Orders, (POs) dated 12/20/24, documented diagnoses of cerebral palsy (a congenital disorder of movement, muscle tone or posture due to abnormal brain, development), epilepsy, (seizures- a sudden…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-03-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 19 residents, with 11 sampled, including one reviewed for hydration. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health for Resident (R)6. This deficient practice resulted the hospitalization admission of R6 for dehydration. Findings included: - Review of R6's diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) included dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and amnesia (loss of memory caused by brain damage or severe emotional trauma). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented R6 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of four, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The assessment documented R6 experienced delusions (a persistent belief or perception held by a person although evidence shows it was untrue) and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs - activities such as walking,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 19 residents and one medication carts. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff had secured storage of resident medications when observation onsite revealed an unlocked and unattended medication cart, not in the line of vision of the attending staff, and contained oral, topical and inhaled medications. This deficient practice placed nine cognitively impaired, independently mobile residents at risk. Findings included: - On 02/25/25 at 08:36 AM, observation revealed an unlocked and unattended medication cart which contained oral, topical, and inhaled medications in the hall between the dining area and the commons area. During an interview on 02/25/25 at 08:36 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) K confirmed the medication cart should be locked when not attended or not within her line of sight. During an interview on 02/25/25 at 08:59 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) O reported medication carts should be locked when out of the line of sight of whomever was responsible (for the medication cart). LN O further explained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported 19 residents with 11 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare and serve food in a sanitary manner. This placed all residents at risk for food bourne illness. Findings included: - An observation on 02/25/25 at 10:40 AM, revealed a trash can at the hand washing sink. The trash can failed to have a foot operated lid. The lid had a flip top and closed by swinging next to the food preparation area. An observation on 02/25/25 at 11:45 AM, Dietary Aide M pushed down trash into the trash can with a gloved hand then resumed preparation of food with the same gloved hand. The facilities Food Preparation and Service Policy revised 5/21/2024 under 5. Hygiene/sanitary practices- food preparation staff will adhere to proper hygiene and sanitary practices to prevent the spread of forborne illness. Under Food Service/Distribution number six revealed bare hand contact with food is prohibited. Gloves must be worn when handling foods directly. However, gloves can also become contaminated and/or soiled and must be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 19 residents with 11 residents reviewed. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a comprehensive infection control program related to laundry delivery. This failure had the potential to lead to contamination of clean linens during delivery which had the potential to negatively affect all the residents in the facility. Findings included: - On 02/25/25 at 03:30 PM, observation revealed laundry personnel transported clean resident laundry in the laundry cart through the facility halls with one of the side covers draped over the top of the cart exposing the clean laundry. During an interview on 02/25/25 at 03:30 PM, Laundry Staff Z confirmed that the laundry cart should have all sides covered when being transported down the hallway and when not attended in the hallway. During an interview on 02/26/25 at 12:57 PM, Laundry Supervisor W reported that delivery of laundry should be done with the front cover and side covers of the linen cart down and the clothes covered. During an interview on 02/26/25 at 12:57 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 19 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, and sanitary environment in the laundry service area. Findings included: - During the laundry tour on 03/04/25 at 09:06 AM, with Administrative Staff H and Laundry/Housekeeping Staff W, revealed the following environmental concerns: 1. Two uncovered soiled linen bins contained soiled linen and clothing which had a sock hanging off the side of the bin. 2. The walkway tiled floor extending from the soiled linen area to the clean area, was not sanitizable due to two broken and missing floor tiles. 3. The floor in the clean linen processing area was not sanitizable due to two missing floor tiles beside the washing machine. 4. The egress from the clean linen room to the hallway entrance/exit doorway with multiple abrasions across the width of the door exposing bare wood, which was not sanitizable. On 03/04/25 at 09:26 AM, Administrative Staff H and Laundry/Housekeeping Staff W confirmed the above findings. The facility lacked a policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 19 residents with 11 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the dignity of Resident (R) 10, when staff transferred the resident from her room to the shower room with her buttocks exposed. The facility failed to honor the dignity of residents in the dining room, when observation revealed a container in the dining room for soiled clothing protectors was labeled bibs only, no trash, and was visible to all residents and guests in the area. These deficient practices had the potential to negatively impact each residents dignity and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - During an observation on 02/25/25 at 02:57 PM, an unknown staff member transported R10 from her room to the shower room, with the resident seated in a shower chair. Observation revealed the resident was covered in a white sheet from her neck to her knees, but her buttocks was exposed during the transport, visible to anyone in the area. During an interview on 02/25/25 at 02:59 PM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 19 residents with 11 residents sampled, including four residents reviewed for advanced directives (a written document which indicated the medical decisions for health care professionals when the person could not speak). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure each resident's code status was accurate and easily identified for Resident (R)17, R3, R14, and R171. Findings included: - Review of the facility's admission Packet provided to the survey team on [DATE] documented a request for copies of DPOA, living will, and advanced directives/DNR paperwork and lacked prompts or blank forms to be filled out by residents or resident's representatives. R17's Electronic Health Record EHR lacked a physical Do Not Resuscitate (DNR or no code - a written legal order to withhold cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR], in respect of the wishes of a person in case their heart stopped or they stopped breathing) form and Physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 19 residents. Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility had an effective system in place for the accurate accounting and reconcilliation of controlled medicaiton. Findings included: - During an observation on 02/27/25 at 09:22 AM, a medication cart narcotics count was performed with Certified Medication Aide (CMA) K. During this count with CMA K, the bottle of Lyrica pills for R9 indicated a count discrepancy. The count sheet displayed 39 pills, the hard count was 38 pills and was performed twice. The last count performed was on 02/27/25 at 06:20 AM by CMA K and Licensed Nurse (LN) V, with a recorded count of 39, signed by CMA K. The previous count 02/26/25 in the morning was performed by CMA K with a recorded count of 40 Lyrica. Review of CMA K's sworn statement dated 02/27/25 included the medication was not caught during count. CMA K documented the night nurse stated she had not taken anything from cart. CMA K took the cart around 6:20 AM to start the morning medication pass. CMA K documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 19 residents with 15 residents sampled which included five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a timely response to the pharmacist's identify and reported irregularities to the facility for four of the five residents sampled, Resident (R)8, R15, R17, and R6. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)8's Physician Orders, dated 02/10/25, documentation included diagnoses of major depression disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in in activities), muscle weakness, dementia (a group of brain disorders that cause a progressive decline in cognitive function and memory), psychotic disturbances (a mental health disorder characterized by a disconnect from reality), mood disturbances a group of psychiatric conditions that can cause intense and persistent changes in mood, energy, and behaviors), and anxiety (a feeling of worry,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 19 residents with 15 residents sampled which included five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Residents who use psychotropic drugs (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. receive gradual dose reductions, and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs) related to a timely response to the pharmacist's identify and reported irregularities to the facility for four of the five residents sampled, Resident (R)8, R15, R17, and R6. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R) 8's Physician Orders, dated 02/10/25, documentation included diagnoses of major depression disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or losoterest in in activities), muscle weakness, dementia (a group of brain disorders that cause a progressive decline in cognitive function and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 29 residents with 12 residents included in the sample. Of the 29 residents five were reported to be Covid positive and were in isolation in their rooms on the 200 hallway. The facility failed to provide a safe sanitary living environment for the residents by the failure to doff personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to leaving the positive residents rooms and using large trash receptacles in the hallway for contaminated PPE, to prevent the spread of covid and infections. Findings included: - Observation, on 02/27/23 at 04:50 PM, revealed Administrative Nurse D standing in the hall after exiting a resident's room with COVID. She stood talking to another staff with no gloves on and still had on the protective blue gown. She pulled the gown by the front of the gown to remove it. She removed the gown and then walked to a hamper in the hall and placed the gown in the hamper. Another CNA was seen at the same time walking in the same hall with a PPE gown she removed and brought it to the same hamper used by the nurse for her contaminated gown. Interview, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 11 citations
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice to Resident (R)25 or their representative when the resident was sent and admitted to the hospital. This deficient practice placed R25 at risk to not be allowed to return to her former room at the facility. Findings include: - The 02/27/23 Electronic Health Records (EHR) documented that R25 had the following diagnoses: type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by persistent high blood glucose when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), atrial fibrillation (A-FIB, a rapid, irregular heartbeat with increased risk for blood clot development), adult failure to thrive (a syndrome characterized by weight loss, decreased appetite, poor nutrition, inactivity, dehydration, and depressive symptoms) and repeated falls. The 09/30/22 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a brief interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 29 residents with 12 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop comprehensive assessments by the failure to develop an admission Minimum data Set (MDS) within 14 calendar days after admission for Resident (R) 79 who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and failed to complete an annual comprehensive MDS for R 17 within 366 days of the previous comprehensive MDS. Findings included: - The facility admitted R79 on 01/24/23 with the diagnoses of cancer of lung and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) - progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing and received Hospice care. Review of the Electronic Medical Record on 02/28/23 at 11:00 AM revealed no admission MDS had been started for this resident. On 02/28/23 at 2:10 PM Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) M reported the resident was an assist of one staff with pretty much all his care. It depended…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 29 residents with 12 included in the sample. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within 92 days of the prior assessment for three of the sampled residents, including Resident (R) 20, R 5, R 14. Findings included: - Review of R 20's Electronic Medical Record revealed the resident's last MDS completed on 10/07/22. A Quarterly MDS then needed completion by 01/07/23. The facility failed to start another assessment as required for this date. - Review of R 5's EMR revealed the resident's last MDS completed on 10/14/22. A Quarterly MDS then needed completion by 01/14/23. The facility failed to start another assessment as required for this date. - Review of R 14's EMR revealed the resident's last MDS completed on 10/14/22. A Quarterly MDS then needed completion by 01/14/23. The facility failed to start another assessment as required for this date. On 02/28/23 at 12:00 PM, Administrative Nurse E and Administrative staff A revealed the MDS assessments were behind. The facility had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 29 residents with 12 selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the MDS for one sampled resident, Resident (R)13, with administration of an anticoagulant (a classification of medications used to decrease or prevent the clotting of blood). This placed the resident at risk for lack of needed cares. Findings include: - The 02/27/23 Electronic Health Records (EHR) documented that R13 had the following diagnoses: atrial fibrillation (A-FIB, a rapid, irregular heartbeat with increased risk for blood clot development), atherosclerotic heart disease (narrowing of the blood vessels supplying the heart), presence of coronary angioplasty implant (a procedure used to open clogged heart blood vessels with implantation of a small wire-mesh tube) and Parkinson's disease (a progressive disorder of the nervous system characterized by unintended/uncontrollable movements). The 08/19/22 Quarterly MDS documented a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - The 02/27/23 Electronic Health Records (EHR) documented that R22 had the following diagnoses: Parkinson's disease (a progressive disorder of the nervous system characterized by unintended/uncontrollable movements) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by persistent high blood glucose when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The 07/15/22 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident required extensive one person assist with all activities of daily living (ADLs) except eating, which required setup. Resident was at risk for development of pressure ulcers/injuries without pressure relieving devices on the bed or chair. The 10/14/22 Annual MDS documented a BIMS of 14, indicating intact cognition. Resident required extensive one person assist with all activities of daily living (ADLs) except eating and toileting, which required setup.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 29 residents with 12 sampled. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for one sampled Resident (R)25, regarding new interventions to prevent falls. This placed the R25 at risk for new injuries from repeated falls. Findings included: - The 02/27/23 Electronic Health Records (EHR) documented that R25 had the following diagnoses: type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by persistent high blood glucose when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), atrial fibrillation (A-FIB, a rapid, irregular heartbeat with increased risk for blood clot development), adult failure to thrive (a syndrome characterized by weight loss, decreased appetite, poor nutrition, inactivity, dehydration and depressive symptoms) and repeated falls. The 09/30/22 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of seven, indicating severely impaired cognition. The resident required limited 1 person assist with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 29 residents with 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the Consulting Pharmacist identified and reported blood sugar irregularities that were out of the parameters ordered by the physician for one of the six sampled residents, Resident (R) 19. Findings included: - Resident (R) 19's signed physician orders dated 02/02/23 revealed the following diagnoses: type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. No behaviors or mood issues. The Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], had no significant changes in cognition or needs noted. The Care Plan dated 05/31/22 revealed the care plan did include interventions for the resident receiving Insulin for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 29 residents with 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of the six sampled residents, Resident (R) 19, remained free of unnecessary medications by the failure to report blood sugars out of the parameters ordered by the physician. Findings included: - Resident (R) 19's signed physician orders dated 02/02/23 revealed the following diagnoses: type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. No behaviors or mood issues. The Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] had no significant changes in cognition or needs. The Care Plan dated 05/31/22 revealed the care plan did include interventions for the resident receiving Insulin for treatment of his diabetes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 29 residents. The facility had one central kitchen where food was stored and prepared for one dining room. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff distributed beverages to residents in a sanitary manner. Findings included: An observation on 07/12/21 at 11:50 AM revealed during the lunch observation, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) B touched the lip of a water glass as she moved the water glass closer towards a resident so he could take his medications. CMA B also touched the lip of the styrofoam drinking cup as she removed food and drink items from a tray to place these items on the table in front of the resident. An observation on 07/13/21 at 8:42 AM revealed CMA B carried a water glass by the rim when she brought R13 her morning pills while she ate her breakfast. CMA B touched the glass by the rim again after putting the glass down and handed the glass to R13. In response to an email on 07/15/21 at 02:02 PM, Administrative Nurse A stated it was her expectation for staff to carry beverages around the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 29 residents, with 12 residents included in the sample and five residents reviewed for immunizations. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)28 received her influenza vaccination and R10 received her pneumococcal vaccination. Findings included: Review of R28's medical records revealed she did not receive or was not offered an influenza vaccination upon admission to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R10's medical records revealed she did not receive or offered a pneumococcal vaccination. During an interview on 07/13/21 at 3:44 PM, Administrative Nurse A stated she expected that when a resident admits to the facility, the resident was either vaccinated, a history is gathered of previous vaccinations, or a refusal to be vaccinated was documented the resident's medical record. Review of the Nursing Procedure Manual dated January 18, 2014, revealed: Administer influenza vaccine yearly unless medically contraindicated, resident has already been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-03-04 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 19 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the posted daily nurse staffing sheets included accurate and identifiable information to include the facility name and daily licensed and unlicensed staff hours, as required. Findings included: - During an observation on 03/03/25 at 03:11 PM, the daily staffing sheet on the wall near the nurse's station. The daily nurse staffing lacked the total number and actual hours worked per shift for licensed and unlicensed staff providing resident care. Review of the daily staffing sheets from 11/28/24 revealed most of the sheets lacked the total number and actual hours worked per shift for licensed and unlicensed staff. During an interview on 03/03/25 03:20 PM, Administrative Staff C confirmed the information on the staffing sheet and stated she was unaware of the regulatory requirement for required elements. The facility policy Sufficient Staffing states that facility leadership will provide sufficient personnel on a 24-hour basis to provide care to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in KS
CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 17E470. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.